§ 瀏覽學位論文書目資料
  
系統識別號 U0002-2007201017310400
DOI 10.6846/TKU.2010.00595
論文名稱(中文) 自我調節及正負訊息對線上閱讀者之態度及口碑傳遞影響之研究
論文名稱(英文) A Effect Study of the Self regulation and information valence on the Message Attitude and Word-of-mouth
第三語言論文名稱
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中文) 企業管理學系碩士在職專班
系所名稱(英文) Department of Business Administration
外國學位學校名稱
外國學位學院名稱
外國學位研究所名稱
學年度 98
學期 2
出版年 99
研究生(中文) 莊浩偉
研究生(英文) Haw-Wei Chuang
學號 797610333
學位類別 碩士
語言別 繁體中文
第二語言別
口試日期 2010-06-05
論文頁數 100頁
口試委員 指導教授 - 李月華
委員 - 徐世同
委員 - 黃曼琴
關鍵字(中) 自我調節
口碑傳遞
訊息可信度
品牌態度
產品知識
關鍵字(英) Self regulation
Word-of-mouth
Message credibility
Brand attitude
Product knowledge
第三語言關鍵字
學科別分類
中文摘要
近年國內外的網路世界越來越多樣化,由於網路本身就具備克服地域性及時間性限制的優勢,再加上它的型式己經相當多樣化,包括網路論壇、部落格或是臉書等多種型態,都擁有其個別的廣大使用族群,也因此網路上的訊息不但傳遞速度快,而且影響的層面也愈來愈廣泛。
  本研究以網路族群為研究標的,探討不同的自我調節類型在接收到網路上的正負訊息時,對於訊息可信度與口碑傳遞(word-of-mouth)有何影響? 
  透過描敍性分析、信度分析、共變異數分析等統計方法,本研究結果如下所述:
  1.不同的自我調節類型、接收到訊息的正負性、品牌態度與測試前口碑行銷對於訊息可信度並沒有影響。
  2.不同的自我調節類型、接收到訊息的正負性、品牌態度與測試前口碑行銷對於測試後的口碑行銷有不同的影響。
  3.接收到訊息的可信度會影響到測試後口碑行銷。
英文摘要
Recently, the network is more and more diverse. Not only the network itself has the superiority which can overcome regional and the timely limit, but also its pattern is the diversification. There are many kinds of states, including the network forum, the Blog and the face book and so on, all have the individual general use tribal grouping tribal group. This makes the network messages not only spread fast but influence widely.
  This research is based on the user of network. Discuss the different type of self regulation to receive the information valence , how did it effects the source credibility and word-of-mouth?
  Here is through descriptive statistics, reliability analysis and ancova statistic methods and the results are as following:
  1. Different type of Self regulation, Information valence on the Message, Brand attitude and origin Word-of-mouth will not influence the Message credibility.
  2. Different type of Self regulation, Information valence on the Message, Brand attitude and origin Word-of-mouth will influence the Word-of-mouth.
  3. Message credibility will influence the Word-of-mouth.
第三語言摘要
論文目次
目錄
目錄........................................................................................................ iv
表目錄.................................................................................................. vii
圖目錄................................................................................................... ix
第一章 緒論........................................................................................1
第一節 研究背景與動機..............................................................1
第二節 研究目的...........................................................................5
第三節 研究流程...........................................................................6
第二章 文獻探討..............................................................................8
第一節 自我調節...........................................................................8
第二節 正負訊息.........................................................................10
第三節 訊息可信度.....................................................................11
第四節 產品知識.........................................................................13
第五節 品牌態度.........................................................................15
第六節 口碑行銷.........................................................................17
第三章 研究方法............................................................................19
第一節 研究架構.........................................................................19
第二節 研究假說.........................................................................21
第三節 研究設計.........................................................................28

第四節 變數定義與衡量............................................................34
第五節 資料分析方法................................................................43
第四章 研究結果分析.................................................................45
第一節 樣本結構描述及分析..................................................45
第二節 自我調節分組................................................................51
第三節 操弄檢定.........................................................................52
第四節 各構面之相關係數.......................................................53
第五節 實驗假說檢定................................................................55
第六節 其他研究發現................................................................58
第五章 研究結論與建議............................................................60
第一節 研究結論.........................................................................60
第二節 研究貢獻.........................................................................61
第三節 研究限制.........................................................................63
參考文獻..............................................................................................64
一、中文部份................................................................................64
二、英文部份................................................................................66
附件一...................................................................................................75
附件二...................................................................................................76
一、正面訊息................................................................................76
v i
二、負面訊息................................................................................80
附件三...................................................................................................91
一、 問卷一:正面訊息問卷................................................91
二、 問卷二:負面訊息問卷................................................94
三、 問卷三:控制組問卷.....................................................97

表目錄
表3-1 自我調節衡量問項......................................................................35
表3-2 產品知識衡量問項......................................................................37
表3-3 口碑行銷衡量問項......................................................................39
表3-4 品牌態度衡量問項......................................................................40
表3-5 訊息可信度衡量問項..................................................................41
表3-6 訊息正反性衡量問項..................................................................42
表4-1 樣本資料分析..............................................................................46
表4-2 各組變數之平均分數及標準差..................................................47
表4-3 各構面量表信度分析..................................................................47
表4-4 各構面量表之因素分析與信度分析..........................................51
表4-5 自我調節構面統計量...................................................................52
表4-6 促進型焦點操弄檢定..................................................................52
表4-7 預防型焦點操弄檢定..................................................................53
表4-8 訊息正反性操弄檢定..................................................................53
表4-9 各構面之相關係數表..................................................................55
表4-10 共變量變數表............................................................................55
表4-11 依變數為訊息可信度之正負訊息與自我調節類型二因子變異
數分析...............................................................................................56
vi ii
表4-12 依變數為測試後口碑行銷之正負訊息與自我調節類型二因子
變異數分析.......................................................................................57
表4-13 正負訊息對口碑行銷程度之成對比較....................................57
表4-14 自我調節類型對口碑行銷程度之成對比較............................57
圖目錄
圖1-1 研究流程圖.....................................................................................7
圖3-1 實驗流程圖..................................................................................32
參考文獻
一、中文部分
1.林清州(1992)。廣告訊息正反性、廣告主可信度、訊息涉入與廣告效果之關係。政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
2.葉亮吟,1999,《訊息正反性和廣告主可信度對兒童廣告效果之研究》。國立台灣科技大學管理研究所企業管理學程碩士論文。
3.梁文傑(1992)。訊息正反性、訊息來源可信度與訊息涉入對廣告效果關係之研究。台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
4.林君珍(2004)。產品置入之廣告研究-以觀光景點置入於台灣偶像劇為例。銘傳大學科觀光研究所碩士論文。
5..翁育萱(2003),訊息數量、訊息結構與認知需求對消費者態度之影響-以網路留言版為例,國立台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文
6.高婉珍,2007。影響網路迅息傳遞意願之研究,中原大學資訊管理學系碩士論文。
7.黃若妤,2009。部落格訊息結構對資訊閱讀者態度及口碑傳遞效果影響之研究,企業管理學系碩士在職專班論文。
8.蔡元勛,2008。網路口碑可信度影響因素之研究,企業管理研究所碩士論文。
9.羅俊拔(1993)。訊息來源可信度與訊息極端性對消費者態度改變之影響。台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。

二、英文部份
1.Aaker, D.A. Managing Brand Equity, New York, NY: The Free Press, 1991.
2.Alba, and Hutchinson. (1987), “Dimensions of Consumer Ex-Pertise,” Journal of Consumer Research 13:pp. 411-454.
3.Anderson, R. D. & Engledow, J.L. & Becker (1979). Evaluating the relationships among attitude toward business, product satisfaction, experience, and search effort. Journal of Marketing Research, 16, 394-400.
4.Ba, S., and Pavlou, P.A. “Evidence of the Effect of Trust Building Technology in Electronic Markets: Price Premiums and Buyer Behavior,” MIS Quarterly (26:3), 2002, pp.243-268.
5.Baker, S., Petty, M.C., Roberts, G.G., and Twigg, M.V., “The Preparation and Properties of Stable Metal-Free Phthalocyanine Langmuir-Blodgett Films”, Thin Solid Films 99, 53, 1983.
6.Banaji, M. R., C. Hardin, and A. J. Rothman (1993). Implicit stereotyping in person judgment. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 65, 272-281.
7.Beatty, S. E. & Smith, S. M. (1987). External search effort: An investigation across several product categories. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(1), 83-95.
8.Bem, D. J. (1970). Beliefs, attudes, and human affairs, Belmont, Calif: Brooks / Cole.Coleman, E. (1982). Developmental stages of the coming out process. Journal of Homosexuality, 7 (2/3), 31-43.
9.Bickart, B. and R. M. Schindler (2001), “Internet Forums As Influential Sources of Consumer Information,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 15(3), 31-40.
10.Blackwell,Miniard, & Engel(2001). Consumer Behavior,(9th ed),FL:Harcourt, P.71.
11.Bone, Paula Fitzgerald(1995), “Word-of-Mouth Effects on Short-Term and Long-Term Product Judgments,” Journal of Business Research, 32, 213-23.
12.Brown, J. J. and Reingen, P. H. (1987) ,"Social Ties and Word-of Mouth Referral Behavior."Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.14, No.4, 350-362.
13.Brucks, M.(1985). The effects of product class knowledge on information search behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(1), 1-16.
14.Bunduchi, R.(2005). Business relationships in internet-based electronic markets: the role of goodwill trust and transaction costs. Information Systems Journal 15(4), 321-341.
15.Camacho C. J., Higgins E. T., & Luger L., 2003. Moral value transfer from regulatoryfit: What feels right isright and what feels wrong is wrong. Journal of Personality andSocial Psychology, 84, 498-510.
16.Cordell, V. Victor (1997), “Consumer Knowledge Measure as Predictors in Product Evaluation,” Psychology & Marketing, 14(3), pp.241~ 260.
17.Cowley, Elizabeth and Andrew A. Mitchell (2003), “The Moderating Effects of Product Knowledge on The Learning and Organization of Product Information ,” Journal of Consumer Research , 30(3), pp.1~ 13.
18.Cunningham, William A., Carol L. Raye and Marcia K. Johnson (2005), “Neural Correlates of Evaluation Associated with Promotion and Prevention Regulatory Focus,” Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 5(2), 202-211.
19.Fishbein M., Ajzen I. (1972), “Attitudes and Opinions”, Annual Review of Psychology” vol 23, pp. 487-544.
20.Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. 1975. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introductionto Theory and Research Reading. MA: Addison—Wesley: 6.
21.Gelb, B.D., Sundaram,S. (2002), Adapting to word of mouth, Business Horizon, Vol.145,No.4, pp.21-25.
22.Goldberg, M. E. & Hartwick, J. (1990). The effects of advertiser reputation and extremity of advertising claim on advertising effectiveness. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 172-179.
23.Goldsmith, R. E., Lafferty, B. A. & Newell, S. J. (2000). The impact of corporate credibility and celebrity credibility on consumer reaction to advertisements.ournal of Advertising, 29(3), 43-54.
24.Grewal, Dhruv, Gotlieb, Jerry and Marmorstein, Howard (1994), “The Moderating Effects of Message Framing and Source Credibility on the Price-perceived Risk Relationship,” Journal of Consumer Research, 21(June), 145-153.
25.Haugtvedt, Curtis P. and Duane Wegener (1994), “Message Order Effects in Persuasion︰An Attitude Strength Perspective, ”Journal of Consumer Research, 21 (June), pp.205-218.
26.Herr, P. M., F.R. Kardes and J. Kim, Effect of Word-of-Mouth and Product- Attributes Information on Persuasion: An Accessibility-Diagnosticity Perspective, Journal of Consumer Research, 1991, Vol.17, No.4, pp.454-462.
27.Higgins E. T., 1997. Beyond Pleasure and Pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280-1300.
28.Higgins, E. Tory (1998), “Promotion and Prevention: Regulatory Focus as a Motivational Principle,” in Advances in Experimental Psychology, Vol. 30, Mark P. Zanna, ed. San Diego: Academic Press, 1–46.
29.Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H.(1953). Communication and persuasion. New Haven,Connecticut: Yale University Press.
30.Howard, D. R. and S. V. Lankford (1994), “Developing A Tourism Impact Attitude Scale.” Annuals of Tourism Research, 21, No.3, pp.121-139.
31.Insko, C. A. & Schopler, J. (1972). Experimental Social Psychology, New York: Academic Press.
32.Kahneman, Daniel and Amos Tversky, Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk, Econometrica, March 1979, pp.263-291.
33.Kardes, F. R. and Herr, P. M. (1990). Order effects in consumer judgment, choice, and memory: The role of initial processing goals. Advances in Consumer Research, Vol.17,No.1, pp.541-546.
34.Katz, D. & Stotland, E. (1959). A preliminary seatement of a theory of attitude structure & change. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of a science (Vol. 3). New York: McGrawHill.
35.Knauer, V. (1992), Increasing Customer Satisfaction, United States Office of Consumer Affairs., Pueblo, CO.
36.Levin, Irwin and Gary J. Gaeth (1988), “How Consumers Are Affected by the Framing of Attribute Information Before and After Consuming the Product,” Journal of Consumer Research, 15(3), 374-378.
37.Levine J.M., Higgins, E. T., & Choi, H. S. (2000). Development of strategic norms in groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 82, 88-101.
38.Liberman, N., Idson, L. C., Camacho, C. J., & Higgins, E.T. (1999). Promotion and prevention choices between stability and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1135-1145.
39.Lockwood P., Chasten A. L., and Wong C., 2005. Age and regulatory focus determine preferences for healthrelated role models. Psychology and Aging, 20, 376-389.
40.Lord, C.G., L. Ross and M.R. Lepper (1979), ”Biased assimilation and attitude polarization:The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098-2109.
41.Lutz, R. J., S. B. Mackenie, and G. E. Belch (1991), “Attitude toward the Ad. As a Mediator of Advertising Effectiveness: Determinants and Consequences.” Advance in Consumer Research, 10, pp.532-539.
42.MacKenzie, Scott B. and Richard A. Spreng (1992), “How Does Motivation Moderate the Impact of Central Processing on Brand Attitudes and Intentions?”Journal of Consumer Research, 18(1), 519-529.
43.Maddux, E. & Rogers,W. E. (1980). Effects of source expertness, physicalattractiveness and supporting arguments on persuasion: A case of brains overbeauty. Journal of personality and social psychology, 39, 235-244.
44.Maheswaran, D. and Meyers-Levy, J. (1990), “The Influence of Message Framing and Issue Involvement” Journal of Marketing Research, 27(August), 361-367.
45.Mangold, W. G., F. Miller, and G. R. Brockway, (1999), "Word-of-Mouth Communication in the Service Marketplace, "The Journal of Services Marketing Vol.13, pp.73-88.
46.Markman, A. B., & Brendl, M. C. (2000). The influence of goals on value choice. In D. L. Medin (Ed.). The psychology of learning and motivation Vol. 39 (pp97-129). CA: Academic Press.
47.Mattila, A.S. & Wirtz, J. (2002). The impact of knowledge types on the consumer search process: An investigation in the context of credence services. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 13(3), 214-230.
48.Meyerowitz, Beth E. and Shelly Chaiken (1987), “The Effect of Message Framing on Breast Self-Examination Attitudes, Intentions, and Behavior,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52 (March), 500-510.
49.Moore, W. L. & Lehman, D. R. (1980).  Individual differences in search behavior for a nondurable.  Journal of Consumer Research, 7, pp296-307.
50.Morgan, Robert M. and Shelby D. Hunt. “The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing.” Journal of Marketing 58 ,July 1994, pp.20-38.
51.Newman, J. W. and Staelin, R. (1972). Prepurchase Information Seeking for New Cars and Major Household Appliances. Journal of Marketing Research, 9, 249-257.
52.Ohanian, R. (1990), “Construction And Validation Of A Scale To Measure CelebrityEndorsers’ Perceived Expertise, Trustworthiness, and Attractiveness,” Journal ofAdvertising, 19(3), pp.39-52.
53.Park, C. W., Mothersbaugh, D. L., & Feick, L. (1994). Consumer knowledge assessment. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 71-82.
54.Petty, R. E., and Cacioppo, J. T., and Schumann, D., 1983, “Central and PeripheralRoutes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement”, Journal ofConsumer Research, 10, September, pp. 135-146.
55.Petty, Richard E. and Cacioppo, John T.(1981). Attitude and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches, Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown Company.
56.Petty, Richard E. and Cacioppo, John T.(1986). The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123-205.
57.Raju, P. S., Lonial, S. C., & Mangold, W. G. (1995). Differential effects of subjective knowledge, objective knowledge, and usage experience on decision making: An exploratory investigation. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 4(2), 153-180.
58.Richins Marsha L, Root-Schaffer Teri (1988), “The Role of Involvement and Opinion Leadership in Consumer Word-of-Mouth: An Implicit Model Made Explicit,” Advances in Consumer Research; 15; 32 – 6.
59.Richins, Marsha L., Negative Word-of-Mouth by Dissatisfied Consumers: A Pilot Study, Journal of Marketing, winter 1983, Vol.47, pp.68-78.
60.Rosnow, R. L. (1991). Inside rumor: A personal journey. American Psychologist, 46, 484-496.
61.Rosnow, R. L. (1998).Rumor as communication: A contextual approach. Journal of Communi-cation, 38, 1-17
62.Schiffman, L. G., and Kanuk, L. L. (1991). Communication and consumer behavior. Consumer Behavior (4th ed. pp.268-306). NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.
63.Shah, J. Y., Brazy, P. C., & Higgins, E.T. (2004). Promoting us or preventing them: Regulatory focus and manifestations of intergroup bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 433-446.
64.Shah, J., & Higgins, E. T. (2001). Regulatory concerns and appraisal efficiency: The general impact of promotion and prevention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 693-705.
65.Singh, Jagdip and Shefali Pandya (1991), "Exploring the Effects of Consumers’ Dissatisfaction Level on Complaint Behaviors, "European Journal of Marketing, Vol.25, No.9, pp.7-21.
66.Strauman T. J., Veith A. Z., Merril K. A., Kolden G. G., Woods T. E., Klein M. H., et al., 2006. Self-system therapy as an intervention for self-regulatory dysfunction in depression: A randomized comparison with cognitive therapy. Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, 74, 367-376.
67.Swan, J. E. (1969). Experimental analysis of predecision information seeking. Journal of Marketing Research, 6, 192-197.
68.Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A.Department of Psychology, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas 75275.
69.West, D. (1994). Validating a scale for the measurement of credibility: A covariance structure modeling approach. Journalism Quarterly, 71(1), 159-168.
70.Wright, Peter, The Harassed Decision Maker: Time Pressures, Distractions, and the Use of Evidence, Journal of Applied Psychology, 1974, Vol.59, May, pp.555-561.
71.Yalch, R. F. and Elmore Yalch, R. (1984) “The Effect of Numbers on the Route to Persuasion,” Journal of Consumer Research, 11 (June), 522-527
72.Yeo J., and Park J., 2006. Effects of parent-extension similarity and self-regulatory focus on evaluations of brand extensions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16, 272-282.
73.Zhang, Yong and Richard Buda (1999), “Moderating Effects of Need for Cognition on Responses to Positively Versus Negatively Framed Advertising Messages,” Journal of Advertising, 28(2), 1-15.
論文全文使用權限
校內
紙本論文於授權書繳交後1年公開
同意電子論文全文授權校園內公開
校內電子論文於授權書繳交後1年公開
校外
同意授權
校外電子論文於授權書繳交後1年公開

如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信