§ 瀏覽學位論文書目資料
  
系統識別號 U0002-2006201815193200
DOI 10.6846/TKU.2018.00590
論文名稱(中文) 以生命週期觀點探討企業社會責任之資源配置
論文名稱(英文) How Business Life Cycle Affect Resource Allocation of Corporate Social Responsibility?
第三語言論文名稱
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中文) 會計學系碩士班
系所名稱(英文) Department of Accounting
外國學位學校名稱
外國學位學院名稱
外國學位研究所名稱
學年度 106
學期 2
出版年 107
研究生(中文) 王柏軒
研究生(英文) Bo-Xuan Wang
學號 605600229
學位類別 碩士
語言別 繁體中文
第二語言別
口試日期 2018-06-09
論文頁數 67頁
口試委員 指導教授 - 謝宜樺
委員 - 吳幸蓁
委員 - 汪美伶
關鍵字(中) 企業社會責任
企業社會責任報告書
企業生命週期
資源配置
關鍵字(英) Corporate social responsibility
Corporate social responsibility report
Business life cycle
Resource allocation
第三語言關鍵字
學科別分類
中文摘要
過去傳統的股東價值最大化的觀點已漸漸式微,現今企業社會責任(CSR)意識之抬頭,企業在其營運時皆須考量到利害關係人之權益,CSR報告書也隨此應運而生。CSR之最終目的係藉由關注利害關係人使其能達成永續經營之目標,而企業可以了解本身所處生命週期階段後並做出最佳決策使其達到永續發展,二者有異曲同工之妙。
本研究係以現金流量作為分類生命週期階段之方法,並以此為自變數,而應變數為使用內容分析法所評分之經濟面向、環境面向、社會面向後再採主成分萃取所得。研究結果顯示,成長期及停滯期之企業對於各類面向較無明顯之關注;成熟期企業特別關注經濟面向及環境面向,並且隨之資源增加而特別關注CSR整體面向;衰退期企業則僅會關注經濟面向。
英文摘要
During the past century, the view of maximizing shareholder value has gradually declined. In the present day, with the rise of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), companies must consider the right of their stakeholders when they are operating. The CSR report has also come into being. The essence of CSR is focus on stakeholders to achieve sustainable development. Companies also can recognize their life cycle stages and make the best decisions to achieve sustainable development. These two things have the same purpose.
The purpose of the study was assessing how business life cycle to affect resource allocation of corporate social responsibility. Therefore, cash flow is used as a method for the classification of life cycle stages which is an independent variable. Use content analysis and principal components analysis to get the score of economic, environment, and social which are dependent variable. The results revealed that (a) companies in the growth stage and stagnant stage don’t pay attention to any aspects. (b) Mature companies pay attention to the economic and the environment. With their resources increasing, they pay more attention to the overall of CSR. (c) Companies in the decline stage only pay attention to the economic.
第三語言摘要
論文目次
目錄
第壹章 緒論	1
第一節 研究背景及動機	1
第二節 研究目的	2
第三節 研究流程	3
第貳章 文獻探討與假說發展	5
第一節 企業社會責任	5
第二節 企業社會責任報告書	11
第三節 企業生命週期	22
第四節 假說發展	27
第參章 研究方法	30
第一節 研究架構	30
第二節 研究期間及研究樣本	32
第三節 實證模型	35
第四節 變數定義及衡量	36
第肆章 實證結果	42
第一節 敘述性統計	42
第二節 信度分析及KMO檢驗	51
第三節 迴歸分析	53
第伍章 結論與建議	57
第一節 研究結論	57
第二節 研究限制	58
第三節 研究建議	59
參考文獻	61
中文文獻	61
英文文獻	63

圖目錄
圖1-1 研究流程圖	4
圖2-1步驟流程圖	18
圖2-2 中宇環保2016重大性議題矩陣圖	21
圖3-1 研究架構圖	31
圖3-2 重大性議題九宮格圖範例	38
圖3-3 花仙子2016CSR重大性議題矩陣圖	39

表目錄
表2-1 企業社會責任歷程發展	6
表2-2 直接影響之相關學者整理	9
表2-3 間接影響之相關學者整理	10
表2-3 間接影響之相關學者整理	11
表2-4 編製企業社會責任報告書之相關規範事項	13
表2-5 與重大考量面相關的管理方針揭露和指標	19
表2-6 Dickinson生命週期階段劃分方式	24
表2-7 企業生命週期分類之經濟理論	25
表3-1 樣本分布表	33
表3-2 研究變數資料來源	34
表3-3 企業生命週期分類	37
表3-4 花仙子企業社會責任各面向之計分	40
表4-1 樣本公司四年間企業生命週期階段變化	42
表4-2 變數之敘述性統計	47
表4-2 變數之敘述性統計	48
表4-3 應變數之KMO檢驗	52
表4-4 CSR三各別面向之迴歸分析結果	54
表4-5 干擾效果之迴歸模型	56
表5-1 實證分析結果彙整表	57
參考文獻
中文文獻
任榮明與朱曉明,2009,企業社會責任多視角透視。
李秀玲,2010,鼓勵引導上市上櫃公司履行企業社會責任,行政院金融監督管理委員會證券期貨局專業報告。
李致翰,2014,執行企業社會責任的前因後果之研究–以綠色智慧資本為干擾變數,淡江大學會計學系碩士論文。
李秀英、劉俊儒與楊筱翎,2011,企業社會責任與公司績效之關聯性,東海管理評論, 13(1):77-111。
李昌翰,2012,員工道德意識、社會責任態度及倫理與社會責任認知之關聯性,淡江大學會計學系碩士論文。
沈中華與張元,2008,企業的社會責任為可以改善財務績效嗎?–以英國 FTSE 社會責任指數為例,經濟論文36(3):339-385。
林文玲與傅鍾仁,2011,企業社會責任之揭露對會計資訊價值攸關性–以台灣資訊電子業上市公司為例,商管科技季刊, 12(2):209-229。
金成隆、林修葳與邱煒恒,2005,研究發展支出與資本支出的價值攸關性: 以企業生命週期論析,中山管理評論 13(3):617-643。
邱垂昌與洪福讚,2008,在不同企業生命週期下智慧資本與企業價值關聯性之研究,當代會計期刊 9(2):201-236。
洪雪卿、陳薇如與傅雁鈴,2013,影響企業社會責任績效之重要因素為何?,商管科技季刊, 14(4):405-441。
徐維澤,2016,以企業生命週期分析企業社會責任對財務績效的影響,中原大學會計學系碩士論文。
凌思武,2009,企業社會責任影響下的客戶關係管理效應研究,上海交通大學碩士論文。
高端訓,2013,企業社會責任對消費者購買意願影響之研究-品牌依附及品牌形象之中介效果,臺北大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
莫光禮,2010,企業社會責任報告中利害關係人參與及其關切議題,成功大學土木工程學系碩士論文。
許妙如,2012,以現金流量模式做為企業生命週期之代理變數研究–以我國上市公司為例,臺灣大學會計學系碩士論文。
陳智惠,2011,企業履行企業社會責任對消費者購車意願之影響,中華大學企業管理學系未出版碩士論文。
陳繪琦,2007,從企業生命週期觀點探視員工分紅入股之研究,淡江大學會計學學系碩士論文。
郭瑞蘭,2014,企業社會責任、企業形象及客戶忠誠度之研究-以長榮海運、陽明海運及萬海航運三家業者為例,台中教育大學事業經營管理學系碩士論文。
黃營杉與齊德彰,2005,企業倫理、社會責任與慈善公益作為之研究-以台灣高科技電子產業為例,人文暨社會科學期刊1(2):65-82。
張育維,2017,企業社會責任揭露程度與財務績效之關聯性,淡江大學會計學系未出版碩士論文。
蔡毓軒,2017,企業生命週期與企業社會責任的關聯–以台灣企業為例,成功大學財務金融學系碩士論文。
鄭思晗、施放、張化堯、孫建平,2015,企業社會責任與企業績效的關係–考慮組織學習與客戶感知的中介效用,技術經濟期刊34(7):116-121。
鄭哲惠、王兼善與張嘉文,2015,現金流量資訊衡量電子業的企業生命週期之概況:兼論其對盈餘攸關性之影響,東吳經濟商學學報,(91):61-80。
劉俊儒、張育琳與劉均怡,2017,在不同企業生命週期下經營績效對高階經理團隊薪酬之影響,當代會計,18(1):79-120。

英文文獻
Adizes, I. 1989. Corporate Life Cycles: How and Why Corporations Grow and Die and What to Do About It. Englewood-Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Anthony, J. H., & Ramesh, K. 1992. Association between accounting performance measures and stock prices: A test of the life cycle hypothesis. Journal of Accounting and economics. 15(2-3): 203-227.
Barney, J.1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Manage. 17 (1): 99–120.
Bender, R., Ward, K. 1993. Corporate Financial Strategy. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.
Berger, A., Udell, G. 1998. The economics of small business finance: the roles of private equity and debt markets in the financial growth cycle. Journal of Banking and Finance 22 (6): 613–673.
Bowen, H. R. 1953. Social responsibilities of the businessman (No. 3). Harper.
Black, E. L. 1998. Life-cycle impacts on the incremental value-relevance of earnings and cash flow measures. Journal of Financial Statement Analysis 4: 40-57.
Buysse,K.and Verbeke,A.2003,Proactive environmental strategies:A stakeholder management perspective.Strategic Management Journal 24:453-470 
Calantone, R. J., Cavusgil, S. T., & Zhao, Y. 2002. Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance. Industrial marketing management 31(6): 515-524.
Campbell, J.L. 2007. Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management 32 (3): 948–967.
Carnegie, A. 1889. Wealth. The North American Review 148(391): 653-664.
Carroll, A. B. 1995. Stakeholder thinking in three models of management morality: a perspective with strategic implications. Understanding stakeholder thinking: 47-74.
DeAngelo, H., DeAngelo, L., & Stulz, R. M. 2006. Dividend policy and the earned/contributed capital mix: a test of the life-cycle theory. Journal of Financial economics, 81(2): 227-254.
Dickinson, V. 2011. Cash flow patterns as a proxy for firm life cycle. The Accounting Review 86(6): 1969-1994.
Faff, R., Kwok, W. C., Podolski, E. J., & Wong, G. 2016. Do corporate policies follow a life-cycle? Journal of Banking and Finance 69:95-107.
Fombrun, C., Shanley, M.,1990. What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academic of Manage Journal33 (2): 233–258.
Flammer, C. 2015. Does corporate social responsibility lead to superior financial performance? A regression discontinuity approach. Management Science, 61(11): 2549-2568.
Freeman,R.E.1984.Strategi mananement:A stakeholder approach:Boston:Pitman /Ballinger 
Grant, R.M. 1991. The resource-based theory of competitive advantage. Strategy: Critical Perspectives on Business and Management 135:114–135.
Griffin, J. J., & Mahon, J. F. 1997. The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: Twenty-five years of incomparable research. Business & Society 36(1): 5-31.
Hansen, U. 2004. Stakeholder theory between general and contextual approaches-A German view. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts-und Unternehmensethik 5(3): 242.
Hasan, M. M., & Habib, A. 2017. Corporate life cycle, organizational financial resources and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 13(1): 20-36.
Hay, R.D., Ginter, P. 1979. Strategies for maintaining a share of the market. In: Annual meeting of the Southern Academy of Management, Atlanta.
Helfat, C.E., Peteraf, M.A. 2003. The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles. Strategic Manage. J. 24 (10): 997–1010.
Henriques,I.and P.Sadorsky.1999.The Relationship Between Environmental Commitment and Managerial Perceptions of Stakeholder Importance.Academy of Management Journal 42(1):87-99.
Jensen, M.C., Meckling, W.H. 1976. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics. 3 (4): 305–360.
Jovanovic, B. 1982. Selection and the evolution of industry. Econometrica 50 (3), 649–670.
Kaiser, H. F., Rice, J. 1974. Little jiffy, mark IV. Educational and psychological measurement, 34(1), 111-117.
Kazanjian, R. K., & Drazin, R. 1989. An empirical test of a stage of growth progression model. Management science, 35(12): 1489-1503.
Kotler, P. 2003.A Framework for Marketing Management, 3rd edit. Prentice Hall.
Lambertini, L., Tampieri, A. 2015. Incentives, performance and desirability of socially responsible firms in a Cournot oligopoly. Econ. Model 50: 40–48.
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. 1977. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. biometrics, 159-174.
Lewis, V. L., & Churchill, N. C. 1983. The five stages of small business growth.
Maksimovic, V., & Phillips, G. 2008. The industry life cycle, acquisitions and investment: Does firm organization matter? The Journal of Finance 63(2):673-708.
Maslow, A. H. 1943. A theory of human motivation. Psychological review 50(4): 370.
Mason Haire.1959. Modem Organization Theory .New York: Wiley
McWilliams, A., and D. Siegel. 2000. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal 21: 603-609.
McWilliams, A., Van Fleet, D.D., Cory, K.D. 2002. Raising rivals’ costs through political strategy: an extension of resource-based theory. Journal of  Manage39.
(5), 707–724.
Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. 1984) A longitudinal study of the corporate life cycle. Management science, 30(10): 1161-1183.
Nielinger,O.2003.Wirtschaft und Nichtregierungsorganisationen: Eine Liaison mit Zukunft? Nord-Süd aktuell 17 (1) :126-136
Nollet, J., Filis, G., & Mitrokostas, E. 2016. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: A non-linear and disaggregated approach. Economic Modelling 52: 400-407.
Penrose, E.T.1959. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. New York: Wiley
Powell, G.N. 1984. Effects of job attributes and recruiting practices on applicant decisions: A comparison. Personnel Psychology37(4):721-732.
Porter, M. 1980. Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New York, NY: The Free Press.
Richardson, S. 2006. Over-investment of free cash flow.Review of Accounting Studies. 11 (2/3): 159–189.
Savage,G.T.,T.W.Nix,C.J.Whitehead,and J.D.Blair,1991,Strategies for Assessing and Managing Organizational Stakeholders.Academy of Management Executive 5(2) : 61-75.
Schaltegger, S., & Burritt, R. 2005. Corporate sustainability.Doctoral dissertation, Edward Elgar.
Selling, T. I., and C. P. Stickney .1989.The Effects of Business Environment and Strategy on a Firm's Rate of Return on Assets. Financial Analysts Journal 45(1): 43-52.
Smith, K.G., Mitchell, T.R., and C.E. Summer. 1985. Top Level Management Prioritiesin Different Stages of the Organizational Life Cycle. Academy of Management Journal 28: 799-820.
Spence, M. 1977. Entry, capacity, investment, and oligopolistic pricing. Bell Journal of Economics 8 (2):534–544.
Spence, M. 1979. Investment strategy and growth in a new market. Bell Journal of Economics 10 (1): 1–19.
Tang, Z., Hull, C. E., & Rothenberg, S. 2012. How corporate social responsibility engagement strategy moderates the CSR–financial performance relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 49(7): 1274-1303.
Tsoutsoura, M. 2004. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Center for responsible business.
Turban,D.B., and D. W. Greening. 1997. Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal 40(3):658-672.
Van de Ven, A. H., & Poole, M. S. 1995. Explaining development and change in organizations. Academy of management review 20(3): 510-540.
Wen Chin Wei.,and Yi Hsuan Chuage.2009. An Empirical Study of the Relationship among Corporate. International Journal of LISREL, 2(2): 1-21.
Wernerfelt, B., 1984. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Manage. J. 5 (2): 171–180.
Wernerfelt, B. 1985. The dynamics of prices and market shares over the product life cycle. Management Science 31 (8): 928–939.
World Business Council for Sustainable Development, & World Resources Institute. 2001. The greenhouse gas protocol: a corporate accounting and reporting standard. World Resources Inst.
Zairi, M., & Peters, J. 2002. The impact of social responsibility on business performance, Managerial Auditing Journal 17(4):174-178.
論文全文使用權限
校內
紙本論文於授權書繳交後5年公開
同意電子論文全文授權校園內公開
校內電子論文於授權書繳交後5年公開
校外
同意授權
校外電子論文於授權書繳交後5年公開

如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信