目前在各產業全球環保已成為一個重要議題，因此，企業在營運時不能只專注於獲利價值，應該同時將綠色概念導入新產品開發中，以製造出對環境友善之產品，才能達到永續經營的目標，回饋於社會。

    但由於組織結構的不同，導致新產品開發所帶給企業的獲利也有所不同，對於企業而言，如何將組織結構配置到最佳的狀態以達到最高的獲利就變得相當重要，而組織結構的不同將如何影響到企業的獲利，則成為本研究的動機與目的。

    本研究採取量化研究方式來探討「綠色創新」、「新產品開發績效」與「組織效益」之間的關係，並探討「組織結構」是否會對「新產品開發」與「組織效益」之關係具有干擾效果。抽取國內高科技產業從事專案之人員為研究樣本。針對回收的有效樣本250份資料，進行敘述性統計分析、信度分析、因素分析、層級迴歸分析。經證實分析之後，獲得結論如下：

（１）綠色創新對於新產品開發績效有顯著正向影響
（２）新產品開發績效發對組織效益有顯著正向影響
（３）新產品開發績效對於綠色創新與組織效益之間具有中介效果
（４）組織結構對於新產品開發績效與組織效益之間具有干擾效果

    最後，依據研究結果，對高科技產業之專案團隊及未來研究提出具體建議，以供參考。

Global environmental protect has become a major concern in the industry. Thus, enterprise should not focus only on the benefits but also integrate green concept into the development of new products. They can produce friendly products ,and run their business for long-term having a positive feedback towards population.
    The Organization structure will have a positive repercussion in the creation of new product development , having benefits for the same , establishing and allocating the organization structure will be a key point in having a higher profitability for the company , this research has as a purpose and motivation to investigate how the difference in organizational structures will affect its profits  
    The primary of this research was to examine the relationships among green innovation, new product development (NPD) performance, and organization benefit. This study also investigated the moderating effects of organizational structure on the relationships between NPD performance and organization benefit. A total of 250 survey responses were used for descriptive analysis, reliability analysis, construct validity and regression analysis. The empirical results are as following:
1.Green innovation is positively associated with new product development performance.
2.New product development is positively associated with organization benefit.
3.New product development has mediating effect on the relationship between green innovation and organization benefit.
4.Organizational structure has moderating effect on the relationship between new product development and organization benefit.
Finally, several suggestions are proposed for the high-tech firms and future research.

目錄............................................Ⅰ
表目錄..........................................Ⅲ
圖目錄..........................................Ⅴ
第一章 緒論......................................1
第一節 研究背景與動機............................3
第二節 研究目的..................................3
第三節 研究流程..................................3
第二章 文獻回顧..................................5
第一節 綠色創新..................................5
第二節 新產品開發績效...........................10
第三節 組織效益.................................14
第四節 組織結構.................................15
第五節 研究假設發展.............................18
第三章 研究方法.................................21
第一節 研究架構.................................21
第二節 研究假設.................................22
第三節 研究變數之操作性定義與衡量...............22
第四節 研究對象.................................26
第五節 資料分析方法.............................26
第四章 資料分析與討論...........................28
第一節 敘述性統計分析...........................28
第二節 因素分析與信度分析.......................33
第三節 組織效益之影響分析.......................40
第四節 中介效果之層級迴歸分析...................43
第五節 組織結構之干擾效果分析...................45
第六節 研究假設之驗證結果.......................47
第五章 結論與建議...............................49
第一節 研究結論.................................49
第二節 管理意涵.................................51
第三節 研究限制與建議...........................52
參考文獻........................................54
中文文獻........................................54
英文文獻........................................55
附錄 問卷.......................................64

表目錄
表2-1 創新類型之彙整表............................................................................................6
表2-2 綠色創新定義之彙整表....................................................................................8
表2-3 綠色創新分類之彙整表....................................................................................9
表2-4 綠色創新績效評估指標表..............................................................................15
表3-1 綠色創新衡量問項表......................................................................................23
表3-2 新產品開發績效衡量問項表..........................................................................24
表3-3 組織效益衡量問項表......................................................................................24
表3-4 組織結構衡量問項表......................................................................................25
表4-1 新產品之產業類別次數分配表......................................................................28
表4-2 行銷投入佔營業額比重之次數分配表..........................................................29
表4-3研發投入佔營業額比重之次數分配表..........................................................29
表4-4產品種類之次數分配表..................................................................................30
表4-5新產品開發時間之次數分配表......................................................................30
表4-6新產品開發時間之次數分配表(寬裕程度)..................................................31
表4-7新產品價格與其他類似產品之次數分配表..................................................31
表4-8產品開發專案團隊人數之次數分配表..........................................................31
表4-9產品開發專案所擔任角色之次數分配表......................................................32
表4-10 年齡統計之次數分配表................................................................................32
表4-11 教育程度統計之次數分配表........................................................................33
表4-12 職位統計之次數分配表................................................................................33
表4-13 綠色創新之KMO與Bartlett檢定表.........................................................34
表4-14 綠色創新構面之因素分析表........................................................................34
表4-15 新產品開發績效之KMO與Bartlett檢定表.................................................36
表4-16 新產品開發績效構面之因素分析表............................................................36
表4-17 組織效益之KMO與Bartlett檢定表...........................................................37
表4-18 組織結構之KMO與Bartlett檢定表...........................................................38
表4-19 組織結構構面之因素分析表........................................................................38
表4-20 問卷信度分析表............................................................................................39
表4-21 綠色創新對新產品開發績效之迴歸分析表................................................40
表4-22 新產品開發績效對組織效益之迴歸分析表................................................41
表4-23 綠色創新之次構面對產品優勢績效之迴歸分析表....................................41
表4-24 綠色創新之次構面對專案績效之迴歸分析表............................................42
表4-25新產品開發績效之次構面對組織效益之迴歸分析表..................................43
表4-26 新產品開發績效對綠色創新與組織效益之層級迴歸分析表....................45
表4-27 產品優勢績效、專案績效對組織效益之層級迴歸分析表（正式化為干擾變數）............................................................................................................................46
表4-28 產品優勢績效、專案績效對組織效益之層級迴歸分析表（集權與複雜化為干擾變數）................................................................................................................47
表4-29 本研究假說驗證之結果表............................................................................48

圖目錄
圖1-1 研究流程圖........................................................................................................4
圖3-1 研究架構圖......................................................................................................21
圖4-1修改後研究架構圖...........................................................................................39

中文文獻：
1.司徒達賢(2004)，《策略管理》，台北：遠流出版社。
2.呂星金(2005)，策略構形與組織特性的適配對經營績效之影響--以台灣地區電子產業為例。國立台北大學企業管理系研究所博士論文。
3.杜悦元(2008)，台灣電力公司二氧化碳減量策略與成效分析。永續產業發展雙月刊，41，68-77。
4.林彥儒(2011)，探討綠色作業模式與組織環境績效之影響關係-以綠色創新為中介變數。龍華科技大學商學與管理研究所碩士學位論文。
5.洪德芳(1993)，「高科技產業技術策略與行銷策略配合對新產品發展績效關係影響之研究」，中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
6.高明瑞、黃義俊(2000)，「綠色創新的採行與利害相關人關係之實證研究—以臺灣製造業為例」，科技管理學刊，第五卷，第二期，第193-220 頁。
7.高明瑞、黃義俊、張乃仁（2008），「綠色創新能力對組織環境績效之影響」，遠東學報，第二十五卷，第二期，第191-202 頁。
8.張雅菁(2006)，事業策略類型、行銷組織結構、策略性行為與組織績效之研究－以台灣製造產業為例。東海大學企業管理學系碩士班碩士論文。
9.張漢宜（2008），「綠色經濟趨勢論壇企業綠色創新刻不容緩」，天下雜誌，第412 期。
10.許廷睿(2012)，顧客知識管理對專案績效與組織效益之影響-以精密儀器設備銷售專案之觀點。淡江大學企業管理學系碩士在職專班碩士論文。
11.陳宥杉、賴士葆、溫肇東（2005），「環保壓力對企業競爭優勢影響之研究-綠色創新之中介效果」，企業管理學報，第六十四期，第79-102 頁。
12.黃敏萍(2000)，跨功能任務團隊之結構與效能－任務特殊性與社會系落之影響。
13.葉雅青(2005)，組織結構、領導風格、組織策略 及創造力機制與創新績效之關聯性研究。國立成功大學企業管理學系碩博士班碩士論文。
14.蔡啟通、黃國隆、高泉豐(2001)，組織因素、組織成員整體創造性與組織創新之關係。管理學報，18(4)，527－566。
15.賴士葆(1990)，「影響企業產品創新績效內部關鍵因素」，管理新思潮，台北： 管拓文化事業公司，頁83-108。
16.賴士葆(1990)，「研究發展/行銷/製造三部門互動與新產品發展績效相關之研究」，華泰書局，台北。

英文文獻：
1.Abernathy, W. J. and Kim, C. B. (1985). “Innovation：Mapping the winds of creative destruction,” Research Policy, 14, 3-22. 
2.Atuahene-Gima, K. (1995). “An exploratory analysis of the impact of market orientation on new product performance-a contingency approach,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12( 4) , 275-293.
3.Baron, R. M. and Kenny, D. A. (1986).“The Moderator-Mediator variable distinction in social psychological research：conceptual, strategy, and statistical considerations”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182
4.Berry, M. A. and Rondinelli, D. A. (1998). “Proactive corporate environmental management：A new industrial revolution,” Academy of Management Executive, 12(2), 38-50.
5.Birkinshaw, J., Hamel, G. and Mol, M. J. (2008). “Management innovation,” Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 825-845.
6.Blau, J. R. and McKinley, W. (1979) “Idea, complexity, and innovation,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 200-219. 
7.Blum-Kusterer, M. and Hussain, S. S. (2001). “Innovation and Corporate Sustainability: An investigation into the process of change in the pharmaceuticals industry,” Business Strategy and the Environment, 10(5), 300-316. 
8.Booz, Allen and Hamilton, (1982). “New Product Management for 1980s”, Booz Allen & Hamilton Inc., New York, N.Y, 
9.Burgess, D. F. (1989). “The social opportunity cost of capital in the presence of labor market distortions,” Canadian Journal of Economics, 22(2), 245-62.
10.Burns,T and Stalker, G.M.(1961). The Management of Innovatio,Tavistock, London
11.Carrillo-Hermosilla, J., Rio, P. and Konnola, T. (2009). Eco-innovation: When sustainability and competitiveness shake hands, London: Palgrave.
12.Chandler, A.D. (1962). Strategy and structure. Mass: The M. I. T.
13.Chen, Y. S., Lai, S. B. and Wen, C. T. (2006). “The influence of green innovation performance on corporate advantage in Taiwan,” Journal of Business Ethics, 67(4), 331-339.
14.Child, J. (1972). Organizational Structure, Environment And Performance: The Role Of Strategic Choice. Sociology, Vol.6, Pp.1-20.
15.Claude, F. and Peter, J. (1996). Driving eco-innovation: A Breakthrough Discipline for Innovation and Sustainability, London: Pitman Publishing.
16.Cooper, R.G. and Kleinschmidt E.J. (1987). “ New Product: What Separates Winners from Loserss.”, Journal of Product Innovation Management;4(3), 69-184.
17.Crawford, C.M. (1994). New Products Management, 4th Editions, Irwin.
18.Damanpour, F. (1991). “Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators,” Academy of Management Journal, 34 (3), 555-590.
19.Damanpour, F. and Gopalakrishnan, S. (2001). “The dynamics of the adoption of product and process innovations in organizations,” Journal of Management Science, 38(1), 45-65.
20.Davila, H., Pawar, K. S. and Menon, U. (2000). “Measuring Product Development Performance in Manufacturing Organizations,” International Journal of Production Economics,Vol.63, pp.147.
21.Dosi, G. (1998). The Nature of the Innovation Process, London: Elsevier Science, 221238.
22.Dougherty, D. and Bowman, E. H. (1995). “The effects of organizational downsizing on product innovation,” California Management Review, 37( 4), 38-44.
23.Frederic, M. (1995). “Comment on Systemic Risk. In Research in Financial Services: Banking, Financial Markets, and Systemic Risk,” Conn: George Kaufman, 7, 31-45.
24.Garcia, N., Sanzo, M. J. and Trespalacios, J. A. (2008). “Effect of the inter-functional climate on internal and external new product performance. The moderator role of innovation type,” in Proc. International Congress "Marketing Trends" Venice, Italy.
25.Greenberg, J. and Baron, R. A. (2000) Behavior in Organizations: Understanding and managing the human side of work. 7th edition. Englewood Cliffs,
26.Griffin, A. (1997). Modeling and Measuring Product Development Cycle Time across Industries, Journal of Engineering and Technology
27.Gupta, A.K. and Wilemon, D.C. (1990). “ Accelerating the Development of Technology-Based New Products.”, California Management Review,32(2), 24-44.
28.Hodgetts, R. H. (1975). Management: Theory, process, and practice. Philadelphia: Saunders.
29.Huang, X., Geoffrey, N. S. and Brown, A. (2004). “Measuring New Product Success: an Empirical Investigation of Australian SMEs,” Industrial Marketing Management, 33(2),17-123.
30.Hurley, R. F. and Hult, G. T. M. (1998). “Innovation, Market Orientation, and Organizational Learning: An Integration and Empirical Examination,”Journal of Marketing, Vol.62, July, pp.42-54.
31.Johannessen, J. A. and Dolva, J. O. (1994). “Competence and Innovation: Identifying critical innovation factors,” Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Change, 3(3), 209-222.
32.Kaiser, H. F. and Rice, J. (1974). “Little Jiffy Mark IV,”Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34, pp. 111-117.
33.Kammerer, D. (2009). “The effects of customer benefit and regulation on environmental product innovation. Empirical evidence from appliance manufacturers in Germany,” Ecological Economics, 68(8), 2285-2295.
34.Kelm, K. M., Narayanan, V. K. and Pinches, G. E. (1995). “Shareholder value creation during R&D innovation and commercialization stages,” Academy of Management Journal, 38, 770-786.
35.Kemp, R. and Arundel, A. (1998). Survey Indicators for Environmental Innovation, Oslo: STEP Group.
36.Kimberly, J. R. (1986). “The Organizational Context of Technological Innovation,” In D. D.Davis（Ed.）, Managing Technological Innovation, Dan Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 24-43.
37.Knight, K. E. (1967). “A descriptive model of intra-firm innovation process,” Journal of Management, 41, 478-496.
38.Kochhar, R. and David, P. (1996). “Institutional investors and firm innovation: A test of competing hypotheses,” Strategic Management Journal, 17, 73-84.
39.Kotler, P. and Keller, K. L. (2006). Marketing Management（12th ed.）, NJ：Prentice-Hall
40.Kwaku, A. G. (1995). “An Exploratory Analysis of the Impact of Market Orientation on New Product Performance A Contingency Approach,”J PROD INNOV MANAG, pp. 275-293, December 1995.
41.Lai, S. B., Wen, C. T. and Chen, Y. S. (2003). “The exploration of the relationship between the environmental pressure & the corporate competitive advantage,” 2003 CSMOT Academic Conference, Hsin-chu, 69-87.
42.Lin, R. J., Chen, R. H. and Chiu, K. S. (2010). “Customer relationship management and innovation capability: An empirical study,” Industrial Management & Data Systems, 110(1), 111-133.
43.Lumpkin, G. T. and Dess, G. G. (1996). “Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance,” Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135-172.
44.March, J. G. and Simon, H.A. (1958). Organization. New York, Wiley.
45.Miller, D. C. (1986). Psychological And Traditional Dimensions Of Structure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 539-560.
46.Mole, V.and Elliot, D. (1987). Enterprising innovation: An alternative approach, London: Frances Pinter Publishers.
47.Mooney, J. D. (1947). The principles of organisation. New York: Harper.
48.Murphy, J. and Gouldson, A. (2000). “Environmental policy and industrial innovation: Integrating environment and economy through ecological modernization,” Geoforum, 31(3), 33-44. 
49.Nevens, T. M., Summe, G. L. and Uttal, B. (1990). “Commercializing technology: What the best companies do,” Harvard Business Review, 154-63.
50.OECD(2005). The Oslo Manual-Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data （3th Ed.).
51.Olson, E. M., Walker, O.C. and Ruekert, R.C. (1995). “Organizing for New Product Development: The Moderating Role of Product Innovativeness,” Journal of Marketing, 59, 48-62.
52.Oltra, V. and Saint Jean, M. (2009). “Sectoral systems of environmental innovation: An application to the French automotive industry”, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 76, 567-583.
53.Paton, R.A.and McLaughlin, S. (2008). “Services Innovation: Knowledge Transfer and the Supply Chain. European Management Journal,” 30(1), 77-83. 
54.Porter, M. E. (1991). “America’s Green Strategy,” Scientific American, 264(4) 1-68
55.Porter, M. E.and van der Linde, C. (1995). “Green and competitive: Ending the stalemate,”Harvard Business Review, 73(5), 120-134.
56.Pujari, D. (2006). “Eco-innovation and new product development: Understanding the influences on market performance,” Technovation, 26(1), 76-85. 
57.Ramus, C. A. (2001). “Organizational support for employees: Encouraging creative ideas for environmental sustainability,” California Management Review, 43(3), 85-86.
58.Rehfeld, K. M., Rennings, K. and Ziegler, A. (2007). A. “Integrated product policy and environmental product innovations: An empirical analysis,” Ecological Economics, 61(1), 91-100.
59.Rennings, K. (2000). “Redefining innovation: Environmental innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics,” Ecological Economics, 32, 319-332.
60.Rennings, K. and Zwick , T. (2003). Employment Impacts of Cleaner Production, Economic Studies, ZEW: Heidelberg.
61.Robbins, S. P. (1994) Management. (4th ed.). Prentice Hill. 
62.Robbins, S. P. (1994). Organizational Behavior, 976-982.
63.Robbins, S. P. (2001). Organizational behavior.(9th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.
64.Rochford, L. (1991). “Generating and Screening New Product Ideas”, Industrial Marketing Management, pp.287-296.
65.Russo, M. and Fouts, P. (1997). “A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability,” Academy of Management Journal, 40, 534-559.
66.Sachs, J. D. (2008). Sustainable developments: Keys to climate protection Scientific American, April 2008, 27.
67.Sbragia, R. (1984). “Clarity of Manager Roles and Performance of R&D Multidisciplinary Projects in Matrix Structures,” R&D Management, 14, pp.113-126.
68.Schumpeter, J. A. (1939). “Business cycles. Economiste autrichien classique,” professeur a l'Universite de Harvard, 1883-1950.
69.Scott, S. G. and Bruce, R. A. (1994). “Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace,” Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607.
70.Sherman, D. J., Souder, W. E. and Jenssen, S. A. (2000). "Differential Effects of the Primary Forms of Cross Functional Integration on Product Development Cycle Time", Journal of Product Innovation Management;17,57-267
71.Shrivastava, P. (1995). “The role of corporations in achieving ecological sustainability,” Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 936-960
72.Song, X. M. and Montoya-Weiss, M. M. (1998). “Critical development activities for really new versus incremental products.”, Journal of Product Innovation management, 15 (2), 124–135”
73.Song, X. M. and Parry, M.E. (1997). “A cross-National Comparative Study of New Product Development Processes: Japan and the United States”, Journal of Marketing, pp.1–18.
74.Souder, W. E. and Moenaert, R. K. (1992). "Intergrating Marketing And R&D Project Personnel Within Innovation Projects: An Information Uncertainty Model", Journal of Management Studies.
75.Susman, G.I.and Ray.J.M. (1999). Test of a model of organization contributiors to product development team effectiveness. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 16(3-4), 223-245
76.Takeuchi, H. and Nonaka, I. (1986). “The Product Development Game”, Harvard Business Review, 64(1), 137-146.
77.Thomas, R. J. (1993). New Product Development, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
78.Tiwana, A. (2001). “The Essential Guide to Knowledge Management,” Prentice Hall, PTR, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
79.Tuman G. J. (1983). “Development and Implementation of Effective Project management Information and Control System,” New York : Van Nostrand Reinhold Co.
80.Tushman, M. L. and Nadler, D. (1986). “Organizing for innovation,” California Management Review, 3, 73-92.
81.US-AEP. (1999). “Supply Chain Environmental Management-Lessons for Leader in the Electronic Industry,” Clean Technology Environment Management Program, 21-22
82.Utterback, J. M. (1971). “The process of technological innovation within the firm,” Academy of Management Journal, 14, 75-88.
83.Vorhies, D. W.and Morgan, N. A. (2003). A Configuration Theory Assessment Of Marketing Organization Fit With Business Strategy And Its Relationship With Marketing Performance. Journal Of Marketing, 63(1), 100-115.