§ 瀏覽學位論文書目資料
  
系統識別號 U0002-1907201816213200
DOI 10.6846/TKU.2018.00574
論文名稱(中文) 職業球團之危機與回應策略:情境危機溝通理論觀點
論文名稱(英文) Crisis and Responses of Baseball Organizations: A Situational Crisis Communication Theory Perspective
第三語言論文名稱
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中文) 企業管理學系碩士班
系所名稱(英文) Department of Business Administration
外國學位學校名稱
外國學位學院名稱
外國學位研究所名稱
學年度 106
學期 2
出版年 107
研究生(中文) 張家誠
研究生(英文) Chia-Cheng Chang
學號 605610392
學位類別 碩士
語言別 繁體中文
第二語言別
口試日期 2018-06-11
論文頁數 107頁
口試委員 指導教授 - 張瑋倫
委員 - 張巧真
委員 - 李月華
關鍵字(中) 危機回應策略
危機傳播理論
職業運動組織
關鍵字(英) Crisis responding strategy
Situational crisis communication theory
Professional sports organization
第三語言關鍵字
學科別分類
中文摘要
隨著近年體育風潮席捲全球,運動產業的價值不斷地升高,但高速發展也易導致危機的產生,使職業運動組織受到各種危機的考驗,本研究針對職業運動危機,探討球團與球迷在社群媒體上如何透過「危機回應策略」維護球團。本研究引用Coombs的情境式危機傳播理論(SCCT),探討中華職棒的四支球團如何對應聲譽危機事件,從電子布告欄系統內的棒球討論社群中收集球迷對於聲譽危機事件的評論,採用內容分析法分析出球迷使用何種策略來維護危機中的球團,以及球團使用何種策略較能激發球迷對球團的維護行為。
本研究發現,球團採用加強與球迷連結的策略,可以正向影響球迷維護球團的行為,並且會提升球迷使用攻擊指控者策略的比率;球團採用否認危機責任的策略會負向影響球迷維護球團的行為。透過比較團隊型危機或個人型危機,發現團隊型危機下使用提醒策略是最有效正向影響球迷的策略,此外,不論球團使用何種策略,球迷皆會有一定的比例使用合理化策略來維護球團。根據研究結果,本研究建議職業球團的危機管理者在危機初期選擇直接公布事件細節,會有比較大的機會得到球迷的支持;而危機管理所能影響的其實是對球團參與度不高的球迷,使用加強性策略用來強調與球迷間的情感連結能得到更好的支持程度。
英文摘要
The value of sports industry has been constantly rising as the trend of sports swept over the world in recent years. Yet, the rapid development of sports industry leads to the emergence of crisis and forces professional sports organizations to face the challenges. TThis research discusses how the professional sports and fans utilize the "crisis response strategy" on social platform to defend the organizations.  
In this study, Coombs's situational crisis communication theory (SCCT) was used to explore how the four organizations of the Chinese Professional Baseball League (CPBL) correspond to the reputational crisis. The fans’ comments on the crisis were collected from the baseball community on the electronic bulletin board system. We also used content analysis to analyze which adopted tactics by the fans may help them defend for the organizations and which deployed strategies by the organizations can stimulate the fans.  
The results showed that the strategy adopted by the organizations to strengthen the ties with its fans have positive influence on fans’ protecting behaviors and improve the ratio of attack the accuser strategy used by fans. Nevertheless, it has negative effect on the fans’ protecting behaviors if the organizations utilize the strategy to deny the responsibility of the crisis. Comparing team crisis with personal crisis, this study has also discovered the use of reminder strategy is the most effective and positive strategy to affect fans under the team crisis. In addition, there is always a proportion of fans   use justification strategies to defend for the organizations no matter which strategies the organizations used.
According to the key findings, this study suggests that the managers of the professional sports organization will obtain more support from the fans if they choose to notify the detail of the scandals directly on the early stage of the crisis. Crisis management can only influence the fans who have lower involvement and participation for the organizations. Moreover, the strengthening strategy can be used to reinforce the emotional link with fans to obtain more support from the fans.
第三語言摘要
論文目次
目錄
目錄................................................................................................................................I
圖目錄	II
表目錄	III
第一章 緒論	1
第一節、 研究背景	1
第二節、 研究動機	5
第三節、 研究問題	9
第四節、 研究目的	12
第二章 文獻探討	14
第一節、 組織危機處理	14
第二節、 情境式危機傳播理論	20
第三章 研究方法	28
第一節 內容分析法與研究流程	28
第二節 危機回應策略 (Crisis Response Strategy)	38
第四章 資料分析	43
第一節 資料分析	43
第二節 交叉分析與討論	74
第五章 結論	93
第一節 研究結論	93
第二節 管理與實務意涵	95
第三節 研究限制	97
參考文獻	98
附錄:部分內容檢測表(研究者)	105
附錄:部分內容檢測表(編碼員T)	106
附錄:部分內容檢測表(編碼員P)	107

 
圖目錄
圖 2-1 SCCT理論模型 ................................ ................................ .............................. 22
圖 3-1內容分析法觀念架構 ................................ ................................ ..................... 32
圖 3-2 Components of Content Analysis ................................ ................................ .... 32
圖 3-3 分析流程 ................................ ................................ ................................ ........ 34
圖 3-4 球團與迷危機回應策略影響 過程 ................................ ............................ 40
圖 4-1危機回應策略使用比例累積圖 ................................ ................................ ..... 46
圖 4-2 危機回應策略使用比例趨勢圖 ................................ ................................ .... 47
圖 4-3 Lamigo聲譽危機事件 聲譽危機事件 Google trend ................................ ........................... 48
圖 4-4 危機回應策略使用比例累積圖 ................................ ................................ .... 53
圖 4-5 危機回應策略使用比例趨勢圖 ................................ ................................ .... 54
圖 4-6 統一獅聲譽危機事件 Google trend ................................ .............................. 55
圖 4-7 危機回應策略使用比例累積圖 ................................ ................................ .... 62
圖 4-8 危機回應策略使用比例趨勢圖 ................................ ................................ .... 62
圖 4-9 富邦悍將聲譽危機事件 Google trend ................................ .......................... 63
圖 4-10 危機回應策略使用比例累積圖 ................................ ................................ ... 71
圖 4-11 危機回應策略使用比例累積圖 危機回應策略使用比例累積圖 ................................ ................................ ... 72
圖 4-12 中信兄弟聲譽危機事件 Google trend ................................ ......................... 73
圖 4-13危機回應策略使用比例累積較圖 ................................ ............................ 76
圖 4-14 中信兄弟與富邦悍將危機回應策略累積比例對照圖 ............................... 79
III
表目錄
表 2-1 組織危機處理 文獻整................................ ................................ ............. 19
表 2-2 Benoit 形象修復策略 與次形象修復策略 與次................................ ................................ . 21
表 2-3 情境式危機傳播理論文獻 ................................ ................................ ......... 27
表 3-1 內容分析的 目................................ ................................ ......................... 30
表 3-2 危機樣本事件分布狀況 ................................ ................................ ............. 36
表 3-3 危機回應策略 ................................ ................................ ............................. 38
表 4-1 危機回應策略次數與比例表 ................................ ................................ ..... 44
表 4-2 進場人數流失率 ................................ ................................ ......................... 49
表 4-3 危機回應策略次數與比例表 ................................ ................................ ..... 50
表 4-4 進場人數流失率 ................................ ................................ ......................... 56
表 4-5 危機回應策略次數與比例表 ................................ ................................ ..... 57
表 4-6 進場人數流失率 ................................ ................................ ......................... 64
表 4-7 危機回應策略次數與比例表 ................................ ................................ ..... 66
表 4-8 進場人數流失率 ................................ ................................ ......................... 74
表 4-9 危機類 型分................................ ................................ ............................. 74
表 4-10 統一與 Lamigo人數流失率比較 ................................ ............................ 75
表 4-11 球員醜聞事件與回應策略比較表 球員醜聞事件與回應策略比較表 ................................ ........................... 77
表 4-12 中信兄弟 &富邦悍將人數流失率比較 富邦悍將人數流失率比較 ................................ .................... 78
表 4-13 團隊事件與回應策略比較表 ................................ ................................ ... 80
表 4-14 球團使用「否認策略」影響迷各項之比例 ....................... 81
表 4-15 球團使用「否認策略」影響迷各項之比例差 ................... 81
表 4-16 球團使用「代罪羔羊策略」影響迷各項之比例 ............... 82
表 4-17 球 團使用「代罪羔羊策略」影響迷使用各項策略之比例差 ........... 82
IV
表 4-18 球團使用「藉口策略」影響迷各項之比例 ....................... 83
表 4-19 球團使用「藉口策略」影響迷各項之比例差 ................... 84
表 4-20 球團使用「合理化策略」影響迷各項之比例 ................... 85
表 4-21 球團使用「合理化策略」影響迷各項之比例差 ............... 85
表 4-22 球團使用「提醒策略」影響迷各項之比例 ....................... 86
表 4-23 球團使用「提醒策略」影響迷各項之比例差 ................... 87
表 4-24 球團使用「迎合策略」影響迷各項之比例 ....................... 87
表 4-25 球團使用「迎合策略」影響迷各項之比例差 ................... 87
表 4-26 球團使用「受害者姿態策略」影響迷 使用各項策略之比例 ........... 88
表 4-27 球團使用「受害者姿態策略」影響迷各項之比例差 ....... 88
表 4-28 球團使用「道歉策略」影響迷各項之比例 ....................... 89
表 4-29 球團使用「道歉策略」影響迷各項之比例差 ................... 89
表 4-30 球團使用「補救行動策略」影響迷各項之比例 ............... 90
表 4-31 球團使用「補救行動策略」影響迷各項之比例差 ........... 90
表 4-32 球團與迷危機回應策略選擇關聯表 ................................ ................... 92
參考文獻
1.	Avraham, E. (2015). Destination image repair during crisis: Attracting tourism during the Arab Spring uprisings. Tourism Management, 47, 224-232.
2.	Benoit, W. L. (1995). Accounts, excuses, and apologies: A theory of image restoration strategies. Marcombo.
3.	Benoit, W. L. (1997). Image repair discourse and crisis communication. Public relations review, 23(2), 177-186.
4.	Bernard, B. (1952). Content analysis in communication research. New York: Hafner.
5.	Brown, K. A., Dickhaus, J., & Long, M. C. (2012). LeBron James and" The Decision": An empirical examination of image repair in sports. Journal of Sports Media, 7(1), 149-175.
6.	Brown, N. A., & Billings, A. C. (2013). Sports fans as crisis communicators on social media websites. Public Relations Review, 39(1), 74-81.
7.	Bruce, T., & Tini, T. (2008). Unique crisis response strategies in sports public relations: Rugby league and the case for diversion. Public Relations Review, 34(2), 108-115.
8.	Caillouet, R. H., & Allen, M. W. (1996). Impression management strategies employees use when discussing their organization's public image. Journal of Public Relations Research, 8(4), 211-227.
9.	Claeys, A. S., Cauberghe, V., & Vyncke, P. (2010). Restoring reputations in times of crisis: An experimental study of the Situational Crisis Communication Theory and the moderating effects of locus of control. Public Relations Review, 36(3), 256-262.
10.	Cohen, J. R. (1998). Advising clients to apologize. S. Cal. l. Rev., 72, 1009.
11.	Coombs, W. T. (1999). Information and compassion in crisis responses: A test of their effects. Journal of public relations research, 11(2), 125-142.
12.	Coombs, W. T. (2004). Impact of past crises on current crisis communication: Insights from situational crisis communication theory. The Journal of Business Communication (1973), 41(3), 265-289.
13.	Coombs, W. T. (2006). The protective powers of crisis response strategies: Managing reputational assets during a crisis. Journal of promotion management, 12(3-4), 241-260.
14.	Coombs, W. T. (2007). Protecting organization reputations during a crisis: The development and application of situational crisis communication theory. Corporate reputation review, 10(3), 163-176.
15.	Coombs, W. T. (2014). Ongoing crisis communication: Planning, managing, and responding. Sage Publications.
16.	Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, J. S. (2012). The paracrisis: The challenges created by publicly managing crisis prevention. Public Relations Review, 38(3), 408-415.
17.	Crandall, W. R., Parnell, J. A. & Spillan, J. E. (2010). Crisis Management in the New Strategy Landscape. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.
18.	Crijns, H., Cauberghe, V., Hudders, L., & Claeys, A. S. (2017). How to deal with online consumer comments during a crisis? The impact of personalized organizational responses on organizational reputation. Computers in Human Behavior.
19.	Crijns, H., Claeys, A. S., Cauberghe, V., & Hudders, L. (2017). Who says what during crises? A study about the interplay between gender similarity with the spokesperson and crisis response strategy. Journal of Business Research, 79, 143-151.
20.	Derani, N. E. S., & Naidu, P. (2016). The impact of utilizing social media as a communication platform during a crisis within the oil industry. Procedia Economics and Finance, 35, 650-658.
21.	Dwyer, B., Slavich, M. A., & Gellock, J. L. (2017). A fan’s search for meaning: Testing the dimensionality of sport fan superstition. Sport Management Review.
22.	Feliciano, D., McMaster, O., & Isidore, E. P. (2010). U.S. Patent Application No. 12/852,926.
23.	Fombrun, C. (1996). Reputation. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
24.	Frankfort-Nachmias, C., & Nachmias, D. (2007). Study guide for research methods in the social sciences. Macmillan.
25.	Grundy, M., & Moxon, R. (2013). The effectiveness of airline crisis management on brand protection: A case study of British Airways. Journal of Air Transport Management, 28, 55-61.
26.	Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R. and Black, W. (1998) Multivariate data analysis. 5th Edition
27.	Hearit, K. M., & Brown, J. (2004). Merrill Lynch: Corporate apologia and business fraud. Public Relations Review, 30(4), 459-466.
28.	Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities.
29.	Hughes, S., & Shank, M. (2005). Defining Scandal in Sports: Media and Corporate Sponsor Perspectives. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 14(4).
30.	Humphreys, B. R., & Nowak, A. (2017). Professional Sports Facilities, Teams and Property Values: Evidence from NBA Team Departures. Regional Science and Urban Economics.
31.	Jackson, S. J., & Ponic, P. (2001). Pride and prejudice: Reflecting on sport heroes, national identity, and crisis in Canada. Sport in Society, 4(2), 43-62.
32.	Jeong, S. H. (2009). Public's Responses to an oil spill accident: A test of the attribution theory and situational crisis communication theory. Public Relations Review, 35(3), 307-309.
33.	Jin, Y., Liu, B. F., & Austin, L. L. (2014). Examining the role of social media in effective crisis management: The effects of crisis origin, information form, and source on publics’ crisis responses. Communication research, 41(1), 74-94.
34.	Kádárová, J., Mihalčová, B., Kádár, G., & Vida, M. (2015). Strategy Map for the Crisis Communication. Procedia Economics and Finance, 23, 1119-1124.
35.	Kerlinger, F. N., & Lee, H. (1986). Foundations of behavioural research: Educational, psychological and sociological enquiry. Holt, Reinhart and Winston, London.
36.	Ki, E. J., & Nekmat, E. (2014). Situational crisis communication and interactivity: Usage and effectiveness of Facebook for crisis management by Fortune 500 companies. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 140-147.
37.	Kitchin, P. J., & Purcell, P. A. (2017). Examining sport communications practitioners’ approaches to issues management and crisis response in Northern Ireland. Public Relations Review, 43(4), 661-670.
38.	Krippendorff, K. (1980). Validity in content analysis.
39.	Krippendorff, K. (2004). Reliability in content analysis. Human communication research, 30(3), 411-433.
40.	Lachlan, K. A., Spence, P. R., Lin, X., Najarian, K. M., & Greco, M. D. (2014). Twitter use during a weather event: comparing content associated with localized and nonlocalized hashtags. Communication Studies, 65(5), 519-534.
41.	Lastra, R., Bell, P., & Bond, C. (2017). Sports betting and the integrity of Australian sport: Athletes' and non-athletes’ perceptions of betting-motivated corruption in sport. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice.
42.	Lerbinger, O. (1997). The crisis manager: Facing risk and responsibility. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
43.	Liu, B. F., Austin, L., & Jin, Y. (2011). How publics respond to crisis communication strategies: The interplay of information form and source. Public Relations Review, 37(4), 345-353.
44.	Liu, B., Kim, H., & Pennington-Gray, L. (2015). Responding to the bed bug crisis in social media. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 47, 76-84.
45.	Liu, B., Pennington-Gray, L., & Krieger, J. (2016). Tourism crisis management: Can the Extended Parallel Process Model be used to understand crisis responses in the cruise industry?. Tourism Management, 55, 310-321.
46.	Jin Maresh-Fuehrer, M. M., & Smith, R. (2016). Social media mapping innovations for crisis prevention, response, and evaluation. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 620-629.
47.	McCroskey, J. C. (1966). Scales for the measurement of ethos.
48.	Müller, R., & Turner, R. (2007). The influence of project managers on project success criteria and project success by type of project. European management journal, 25(4), 298-309.
49.	Nerb, J., Spada, H., & Ernst, A. M. (1997). A cognitive model of agents in a commons dilemma. In Proceedings of the 19th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 560-565).
50.	Park, H. (2017). Exploring effective crisis response strategies. Public Relations Review, 43(1), 190-192.
51.	Patel, A., & Reinsch, L. (2003). Companies can apologize: Corporate apologies and legal liability. Business Communication Quarterly, 66(1), 9-25.
52.	Pearson, C. M., & Clair, J. A. (1998). Reframing crisis management. Academy of management review, 23(1), 59-76.
53.	Prasad, B. D. (2008). Content analysis. Research methods for social work, 5.
54.	Richards JR, O., Wilson, C., Boyle, K., & Mower, J. (2017). A knockout to the NFL’s reputation? A case study of the NFL’s crisis communications strategies in response to the Ray Rice scandal. Public Relations Review.
55.	Richard W. Budd, Robert K. Thorp, Lewis Donohew. Macmillan,(1967) Content analysis of Communication
56.	Roshan, M., Warren, M., & Carr, R. (2016). Understanding the use of social media by organisations for crisis communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 350-361.
57.	SHAMANSOURI, E., & HASHEMI-MINABAD, H. A. S. A. N. (2010). Causes of sport crises, ways of their elimination and a crisis-management strategic model. Studies in Physical Culture and Tourism, 17(1), 79-83.
58.	Sherwood, M., Osborne, A., Nicholson, M., & Sherry, E. (2016). Newswork, News Values, and Audience Considerations: Factors That Facilitate Media Coverage of Women’s Sports. Communication & Sport, 2167479516645535.
59.	Siomkos, G. J., & Kurzbard, G. (1994). The hidden crisis in product-harm crisis management. European journal of marketing, 28(2), 30-41.
60.	Sisco, H. F., Collins, E. L., & Zoch, L. M. (2010). Through the looking glass: A decade of Red Cross crisis response and situational crisis communication theory. Public Relations Review, 36(1), 21-27.
61.	Smaldino, P. E. (2017). Social identity and cooperation in cultural evolution. Behavioural processes.
62.	Šontaitė-Petkevičienė, M. (2014). Crisis management to avoid damage for corporate reputation: the case of retail chain crisis in the Baltic countries. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 156, 452-457.
63.	Stephens, K. K., & Malone, P. C. (2009). If the organizations won't give us information…: The use of multiple new media for crisis technical translation and dialogue. Journal of Public Relations Research, 21(2), 229-239.
64.	Stewart, M. C., & Wilson, B. G. (2016). The dynamic role of social media during Hurricane# Sandy: An introduction of the STREMII model to weather the storm of the crisis lifecycle. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 639-646.
65.	Stones, R. (1991). Strategic context analysis: a new research strategy for structuration theory. Sociology, 25(4), 673-695.
66.	Sutton, W. A., McDonald, M. A., Milne, G. R., & Cimperman, J. (1997). Creating and fostering fan identifi cation in professional sports. Sports Marketing Quarterly, 6(1), 15–22.
67.	Tajfel, H. (1970). Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific American, 223(5), 96-103.
68.	Varma, T. M. (2011). Crisis communication in higher education: The use of “negotiation” as a strategy to manage crisis. Public Relations Review, 37(4), 373-375.
69.	Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis (No. 49). Sage.
70.	Wilson, B., Stavros, C., & Westberg, K. (2009). A sport crisis typology: Establishing a pathway for future research. International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing, 7(1-2), 21-32.
71.	Zhao, D., Wang, F., Wei, J., & Liang, L. (2013). Public reaction to information release for crisis discourse by organization: Integration of online comments. International Journal of Information Management, 33(3), 485-495.
論文全文使用權限
校內
紙本論文於授權書繳交後5年公開
同意電子論文全文授權校園內公開
校內電子論文於授權書繳交後5年公開
校外
同意授權
校外電子論文於授權書繳交後5年公開

如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信