本研究在探討國際企業採取不同互補資源的聯盟型態時，其創造價值活動受專業文化差異的影響情形，並且發展出相關研究命題，據之以建立彼此間的關係模式。本研究亦欲瞭解相關性互補資源的聯盟型態與國際聯盟創造價值活動效果的關係，並分析專業文化差異如何去影響國際聯盟的績效。
    本研究建構相關性互補資源的聯盟型態可區分為技術性聯盟與行銷聯盟兩大型態。國際聯盟創造價值活動的效果則有智慧財產的創造以及企業股價之變化、固定成本的降低等。
在本研究所建構之模式中，國際技術聯盟的專業文化差異可區分為技術性與科學性文化差異兩類，研究推導認為此種文化差異會造成國際技術聯盟的失敗(無效果)。而行銷聯盟之專業文化差異則可區分為企劃人員與銷售人員間的文化差異，且此類的文化差異亦會干擾行銷聯盟的創造價值活動效果。

This research proposes a model of the relationships between the related complementary resources and the effectiveness of international alliances’ value-creating activities. Further investigation is taken on the moderation of the professional culture relevant to alliance value creation. This study also considers two forms of international alliances, technological alliance and marketing alliance.
  The results of this research indicate that these international alliances do create value for shareholders that are consistent with the creation of intellectual capital. Attention to the two kind of alliances, technological alliances are potentially more beneficial than marketing alliances, and more likely to create intellectual capital. Marketing alliances are more likely to involve the change of stock price. This study also shows that the gains from alliances are not shared equally by all the partners.
 About the professional culture relevant to alliance value creation typically will be the most disruptive. This study also shows that the professional culture can be divided two types in international technological alliances---scientific culture and technological culture. The difference of professional culture will lead to the alliance broke. In the other aspect, another professional culture can be divided two types in international marketing alliances---the culture of project staff and the culture of sales staff. This difference of professional culture hardly to lead to the alliance broke.

目錄．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．IV
表目錄．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．V
圖目錄．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．VI
第一章	緒論．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．1
第一節	研究背景與動機．．．．．．．．．．．．．．1
第二節	研究目的．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．3
第三節	研究方法．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．4
第四節	研究流程．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．6
第二章	文獻探討．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．7
第一節	國際聯盟．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．7
第二節	資源基礎觀點．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．18
第三節	專業文化差異．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．21
第三章	命題發展．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．25
第一節	相關性互補資源對聯盟創造價值活動效果之
影響．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．25
第二節	相關性互補資源的聯盟類型對聯盟創造價值
活動效果之影響．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．27
第三節	相關性互補資源、專業文化與聯盟創造價值
活動效果之關係．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．33
第四節	技術聯盟、專業文化與聯盟創造價值活動效
果之關係．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．36
第五節	行銷聯盟、專業文化對聯盟創造價值活動的
效果之影響．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．41
第四章	模式建構．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．47
第五章	結論與建議．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．52
第一節	研究結論．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．52
第二節	研究限制．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．54
第三節	研究建議．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．55
參考文獻．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．57
表 目 錄
表2-1	聯盟定義彙整表．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．9
表2-2	聯盟的分類型態彙整表．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．12
表2-3  專業、組織及國家等三種次文化比較表．．．．．．．．．．．24
圖 目 錄
圖1-1	研究流程．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．6
圖2-1	一般價值活動．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． ．．．．．．．15
圖2-2	簡化後的價值鏈．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．16
圖3-1	相關性互補資源對聯盟創造價值活動的效果之觀念性
式．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．26
圖3-2	國際技術聯盟對聯盟創造價值活動的效果之觀念性模
式．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．32
圖3-3	國際行銷聯盟對聯盟創造價值活動的效果之觀念性模
式．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．32
圖3-4	相關性互補資源對聯盟創造價值活動的效果會受到專業
文化的影響之觀念性模式．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．35
圖3-5	國際技術聯盟合夥人員工受專業文化差異干擾之觀念性
模式．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．  40
圖3-6 	國際行銷聯盟合夥人員工受專業文化差異干擾之觀念性
模式．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．  ．．．．．46
圖4-1	本研究之結果模式．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．51

一中文部份
1.呂鴻德(1996)，企業策略聯盟-提昇競爭力的經營利器，台北：商周文化。
2.江學華(2003) ，「國籍飛航機師組織文化人格特質與飛航安全績效之研究」，國立成功大學工業管理研究所碩士論文。
3.李文瑞，曹為忠，陳弘林(2000)，「我國積體電路廠商策略聯盟與績效關係之研究」，企業管理學報，第46期，頁154-155。
4.吳青松(1990)，「本國產業策略聯盟結構與績效之評估」，產業科技研究發展管理研討會論文集，台北：中國生產力中心。
5.吳美珍(2000)，「策略聯盟夥伴選擇決定因素及其對聯盟績效影響之研究－我國資訊電子業之實證分析」，銘傳大學國際企業管理研究所碩士論文。
6.黃志明(1992)，「我國國際策略聯盟盟友選擇準則之研究」，國立政治大學企業管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。
7.劉盛光(2004)，「我國壽險業教育訓練與業務員績效關係之研究
－以南山人壽保險公司中部地區為例」，私立逢甲大學保險學系研究所碩士論文。
8.戴國良(2002)，企劃案管理實務，台北：商周文化。


 

二 英文部份
1.	Aaker, D.A. (1995), Strategic Market Management,4th ed.,NY:John Wiley & Sons.
2.	Adler, L. (1966), “Symbiotic marketing,” Harvard Business Review, Vol.44,November-December,pp.59-71.
3.	Adner, R. and Levinthal, D. (2001) ,“Demand heterogeneity and technology evolution: implications for product and process innovation,”Management Science , Vol.47,No.5,pp.611-628.
4.	Astley, W. G., & Fomburn, C. J. (1983) ,“Technological innovation andindustrial structure: The case of telecommunications,”  Advances in Strategic Management, Vol.1,No.4,pp.205-229.
5.	Brown, J.S. and Duguid, P. (1991) ,“Organizational learning and communities of practice: toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation,” Organization Science , Vol.2,No.1,pp.40-57.
6.	Bucklin, L.P. and Sengupta, S. (1993),“Organizing successful co-marketing alliances”, Journal of Marketing, Vol.57,No.2,pp.32-46.
7.	Burgelman, R., Madique, M. and Wheelwright, S. (1996) , Strategic Management of Technology, Innovation, 2nd ed., Chicago: Irwin.
8.	Caloghirou, Y., Hondroyiannis, G. and Vonortas, N.S. (2003) ,“The performance of research partnerships,” Managerial and Decision Economics,Vol.24,No.2,pp.85-99.
9.	Chan, S.H., Kensinger, J.W., Keown, AJ. and Martin, J.D. (1999), “When do strategic alliances create shareholder value?”Journal of Applied Corporate Finance,Vol.11,No.4, pp.82-7.
10.	David, G.S., Peter, J.L., (2004),“A model of cultural differences and international alliance performance,” Journal of International Business Studies,Vol.35,No.4,pp.306.
11.	Das, S., Sen, P.K. and Sengupta, S. (1998), “Impact of strategic alliances on firm valuation,”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol.41,No.1, pp.27-41.
12.	Das, S., Sen, P.K. and Sengupta, S.(2003), “Strategic alliances:A valuable way to manage intellectual capital? ”,Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol.4,No.1, pp.10-19.
13.	Das, T.K. and Teng, B.S. (2000) , “A resource-based theory of strategic alliances,”, Journal of Management,Vol.26,No.1,pp.31-61.
14.	Devilin, G. and Mark, B.(1988), “Strategic Alliances –Guidelines for Success , Long Range Planning,Vol.21,May,pp.18-23.
15.	Garud, R. and Rappa, M.A. (1994) , “A socio-cognitive model of technology evolution: the case of cochlear implants,“ Organization Science, Vol.5,No.3, pp.344-362.
16.	Gilbert, G.N. and Mulkay, M. (1984) ,Opening Pandora's Box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientists' Discourse, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17.	Glaister, K.W. and Buckley, P.J. (1996) , “Strategic motives for international alliances formation,” Journal of Management Studies , Vol.33,No.3,pp.301-332.
18.	Doz, Y.L. and Hamel, G. (1998), Alliance Advantage, MA: Harvard Business School Press,Addison-Wesley.
19.	Gupta, U. (1994),“Bio-tech firms seek novel antidotes to capital shortage,”Wall Street Journal,Vol.29,September,B2.
20.	Hagedoorn, J. (1993), “Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: interorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences,” Strategic Management Journal,Vol.14,No.5,pp.371-85. 
21.	Hagedoorn, J. (2002) , “Inter-firm R&D partnerships: an overview of major trends and patters since 1960,” Research Policy,Vol.31,No.4, pp.477-492.
22.	Hagstrom, W.O. (1982) ,“Gift Giving as an Organizing Principle in Science,”In: B. Barnes, D. Edge (eds.) Science in Context: Readings in the Sociology of Science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.  
23.	Harrigan, KR. (1988),“Joint ventures and competitive strategy,” Strategic Management Journal,Vol.9,No.2,pp.141-158
24.	Harrison, J.S., Hitt, M.A., Hoskisson, R.E. and Ireland, R.D. (2001) , “Resource complementary in business combinations: extending the logic to organizational alliances,” Journal of Management,Vol.27,No.6,pp. 679-690.
25.	Hart, 0. and Moore, J. (1990), “Property rights and the nature of the firm,” journal of Political Economy,Vol.98,No.6,pp.1119-58. 
26.	Hitt, M.A., Dacin, A.D., Levitas, M.T., Arregle, J.L. and Borza, A. (2000) , “Partner selection in emerging and developed market contexts: resource-based and organizational learning perspectives,” Academy of Management Journal,Vol.43,No.3,pp.449-467.
27.	Hofstede, G. (1980), Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
28.	Hofstede, G., Neuijen, B., Ohayv, D.D. and Sanders, G. (1990), “Measuring organizational cultures: a qualitative and quantitative study across twenty cases,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.35,No.2, pp.286-316.
29.	Inkpen, A.C. and Dinur, A. (1998) ,“Knowledge management processes and international joint ventures,”Organization Science,Vol.9,No.4,pp.454-468.
30.	James, B. (1985), “Alliances: The new strategic focus,” Long Range Planning,Vol.18,No.3,pp.76-81.
31.	Johnson, J.L., Cullen, J.B., Sakano, T. and Takenouchi, H. (1996), “Setting the stage for trust and strategic integration in Japanese-US cooperative alliances,” Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 27,No.5,pp.981-1004.
32.	Killing, P. (1983),“ How to make a Global Joint Venture Work,” Harvard Business Review ,Vol.60,No.3,pp.120-127.
33.	Klein, B., Crawford, R. and Alchian, A. (1978),“Vertical integration, appropriable rents, and the competitive contracting process,”Journal of Law and Economics,Vol.21,pp.297-326.
34.	Kogut, B. (1988),“Joint ventures: theoretical and empirical perspectives,”Strategic Management Journal,Vol.9,No.4,pp.319-32. 
35.	Kuhn, T.S. (1970),The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36.	Lane, H.W. and Beamish, P.W. (1990) ,“Cross-cultural cooperative behavior in joint ventures in LDC's,”Management International Review, Vol.30,special issue,pp.87-102.
37.	Lane, P.J. and Lubatkin, M. (1998) ,“Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol.19,No.5,pp.461-477.
38.	Lane, P.J., Salk, J.E. and Lyles, M.A. (2001) ,“Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures,” Strategic Management Journal,Vol.22,No12,pp.1139-1161.
39.	Lewis, J. D. (1990), “Making strategic alliance work, ” Research Technology Management,Vol.33,No.6,pp.12-15.
40.	Lubatkin, M., Florin, J. and Lane, P.J. (2001), “Learning together and apart: a model of reciprocal interfirm learning,” Human Relations, Vol.54,No.10,pp.1353-1378.
41.	Madhok, A. and Tallman, S.D. (1998), “Resources, transactions and risks: managing value through interfirm collaborative relationships,” Organization Science ,Vol.9,pp.326-339.
42.	Mikhailov, A.I., Chernyi, A.I. and Giliarevskii, R.S. (1984), Scientific Communication and Informatics, (translated by RH Burger), Arlington, VA: Information Resources Press.
43.	Michailova, S. and Husted, K. (2003),“Knowledge-sharing hostility in Russian firms,”California Management Review,Vol.45,No.3,pp.59-77.
44.	Mowery, D.C., Oxley, J.E. and Silverman, B.S. (1998),“Technological overlap and interfirm cooperation: implications for the resource-based view of the firm,” Research Policy,Vol.27,No.5,pp.507-523.
45.	Mulkay, M.J. (1977) ,“Sociology of the Scientific Research Community,” In I. Spiegel-Rosing, D. de Solla Price (eds.) Science, Technology, and Society: A Cross Disciplinary Perspective, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
46.	Murray, E. A., & Mahon, J. F. (1993) ,Strategic alliances: Gateway to the new Europe. Long Range Planning,Vol.26,No.4,pp.102-111.
47.	Narula, R. and Hagedoorn, J. (1999) ,“Innovating through strategic alliances: moving towards international partnerships and contractual agreements,” Technovation,Vol.19,No.5,pp.283-294.
48.	Nightingale, P. (1998),“A cognitive model of innovation,” Research Policy,Vol.27,No.7,pp.689-702.
49.	Nummela, N. (2003), “Looking through a prism: multiple perspectives to commitment to international R&D collaboration,” Journal of High Technology Management Research,Vol.14,No.1,pp.135-148.
50.	OECD ,(2000) ,OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook, Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
51.	Ohmae, K. (1989),“The global logic of strategic alliances,” Harvard Business Review,Vol.3,No.4,pp.143-154.
52.	Park, S.H. and Ungson, G.R. (1997),“The effect of national culture, organizational complementarity, and economic motivation on joint venture dissolution,” Academy of Management Journal,Vol.40,No.2,pp.279-307.
53.	Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G. (1978), The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective, NY:Harper & Row.
54.	Porter, M.E. (1985), Competitive Advantage, New York: Free Press.
55.	Porter, M. E., & Fuller, M. B. (1986), Coalitions and global strategy.Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
56.	Pothukuchi, V., Damanpour, F., Choi, J., Chen, C.C. and Park, S.H. (2002),“National and organizational culture differences and international joint venture performance,”Journal of International Business Studies,Vol.33,No.2,pp.243-265.
57.	Powell, W. (1987), “Hybrid organizational arrangements: new form or transitional development?”Calfornia Management Review,Vol.30,No.1, pp.67-88.
58.	Ray, G., Barney, J.B. and Muhanna, W.A. (2004) ,“Capabilities, business processes, and competitive advantage: choosing the dependent variable in empirical tests of the resource-based view,”Strategic Management Journal,Vol.25,No.1,pp.23-37.
59.	Rip, A. (1992), “Science and technology as dancing partners,” In P. Kroes and M. Bakker (eds.) Technological Development and Science in the Industrial Age, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
60.	Root, F. (1988), Some taxonomics of international cooperative arrangements. In F. J. Contractor & P. Lorange (Eds.), Cooperative Strategies in International Business , New York: Lexington Books.
61.	Sarkar, M.B., Echambadi, R., Cavusgil, S.T. and Aulakh, P.S. (2001) ,“The influence of complementarity, compatibility, and relationship capital on alliance performance,” Academy of Marketing Science Journal, Vol. 29,No.4,pp.358-373.
62.	Sierra, C. M.,(1995), Managing global alliance-key steps for success ful collaboration, New York: Wisley Publishing Company.
63.	Somnath Das,  Pradyot K Sen,  Sanjit Sengupta,(2003),“Strategic alliances: A valuable way to manage intellectual capital?”Journal of Intellectual Capital,Vol.4,No.1,pp.10.
64.	Starbuck, W.H. and Milliken, F.J. (1988), “Executives' Perceptual Filters: What They Notice and How They Make Sense,” In D.C. Hambrick (eds.) The Executive Effect: Concepts and Methods for Studying Top Managers, Greenwich,CT: JAI Press.
65.	Straton, R. A. (1982). Organizational characteristics of consortia in intensive technology industries. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, California :University of California.
66.	Terpstra, V. and David, K. (1991), The Cultural Environment of International Business, 3rd ed.,Cincinnati: South-Western Publishing Co.
67.	Thurow, L. (1993), Head to Head, London: NB Publishing.
68.	Trice, H.M. and Beyer, J.M. (1993), The Culture of Work Organizations, Englewood Cliffs,NJ: Prentice-Hall.
69.	Tushman, M.L. and Rosenkopf, L. (1992), “Organizational determinants of technological change: toward a sociology of technological evolution,”Research in Organizational Behavior,Vol.14,pp.311-347.
70.	Van Maanen, J. and Barley, S.R. (1984), “Occupational communities: culture and control in organizations,” Research in Organizational Behavior,Vol.6,pp.287-365.
71.	Vidal-Suarez, M.A. (2002) ,“Stock market response to the formation of global alliances: evidence from Spanish corporations,” European Business Review,Vol.14,No.6,pp.401-408.
72.	Weick, K.E. (1995) ,Sensemaking in Organizations, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
73.	Williamson, 0. and Ouchi, W.G. (1981), “The markets and hierarchies and the visible hand perspectives,” in Van de Ven, A. and Joyce, W. (Eds), Perspectives on Organization Design and Behavior,NY:John Wiley & Sons.