§ 瀏覽學位論文書目資料
  
系統識別號 U0002-1807201423292700
DOI 10.6846/TKU.2014.00684
論文名稱(中文) 超越身體質量指數:體型對就業的影響
論文名稱(英文) Beyond BMI: The impact of body size on employment
第三語言論文名稱
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中文) 產業經濟學系碩士班
系所名稱(英文) Department of Industrial Economics
外國學位學校名稱
外國學位學院名稱
外國學位研究所名稱
學年度 102
學期 2
出版年 103
研究生(中文) 吳婉鈺
研究生(英文) Wan-Yu Wu
學號 601540023
學位類別 碩士
語言別 繁體中文
第二語言別
口試日期 2014-06-19
論文頁數 96頁
口試委員 指導教授 - 胡登淵
委員 - 鄒孟文
委員 - 陳世能
委員 - 胡登淵
關鍵字(中) 就業
BMI
體脂肪百分比
腰圍
半無母數模型
二元選擇的半無母數模型
關鍵字(英) Employment
BMI
Percent body fat
Waist circumference
Seminonparametric model
Seminonparametric estimation of bivariate binary-choice model
第三語言關鍵字
學科別分類
中文摘要
近年來,肥胖在許多已開發國家中,成為一個普遍盛行的健康問題。然而,肥胖除了會影響健康外,還可能進而影響生產力與勞動市場的表現。現有許多肥胖和勞動市場的研究大多是以BMI作為肥胖的衡量指標,但在醫學文獻中,BMI並非總是被認為是一個有效的肥胖衡量,因為它沒有區分脂肪與無脂肪質量(肌肉、骨骼等)。
   有鑑於此,本文使用三種肥胖衡量指標,分別為BMI、體脂肪百分比與腰圍來研究體型對就業的影響,資料取自1999~2004年共三波的美國國民健康與營養調查(National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, NHANES),因為此三波調查資料涵蓋這三種肥胖衡量指標。本文採用假設分佈較具彈性的半無母數(Seminonparametric)與二元選擇的半無母數(Seminonparametric estimation of bivariate binary-choice)模型進行估計,並採用肥胖盛行率作為工具變數,以Control function approach來控制肥胖與就業間的內生性問題。
   研究結果顯示:在半無母數模型中, BMI、PBF與腰圍對於男性就業機率之影響呈現倒U型,其中又以腰圍最為顯著,而女性BMI、PBF與腰圍對就業機率的影響呈負向線型;在二元選擇的半無母數模型中,不論男性和女性,BMI≧30的人,其就業機率都會顯著較低。然而,體脂肪肥胖和腰圍肥胖僅對女性就業有顯著的負向影響,即女性體脂肪百分比>32%者、腰圍>88公分者,會有相對較低的就業機率,在三種指標中,腰圍肥胖對女性就業的負向影響是最大的。
   本文進而嘗試控制肥胖相關疾病-高血壓與糖尿病─作為控制變數,並採用高血壓盛行率與糖尿病盛行率作為工具變數,以Control function approach處理兩種疾病的內生性問題。所有模型在控制此二項健康條件後,大多會稍微弱化肥胖對就業的影響。
   倘若僅以BMI作為肥胖的衡量指標,那麼男、女性肥胖對其勞動市場結果皆會有負向的影響,但若進一步考量PBF和腰圍指標,不僅能捕捉到腰圍對男性就業之倒U型影響,亦能看出肥胖對女性就業的負向影響較明顯。
英文摘要
In recent years, obesity has become a widespread prevalence of health problems in many developed countries. However, obesity will not only affect health but also labor market outcomes. Many existing studies of obesity almost universally use BMI as a measure of obesity. In the medical literature, the belief that BMI is an accurate measure of obesity is not always well-founded, because it does not distinguish fat from muscle, bone, and other lean body mass.
  This study, hence, uses three measures of obesity--BMI, percent body fat and waist circumference--to examine the impact of body size on employment. The data come from three waves of National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), including the 1999-2000, 2001-2002 and 2003-2004 surveys, since these three waves of data have those three measures of obesity. By making flexible distribution assumption, it uses the seminonparametric model and seminonparametric estimation of bivariate binary-choice model. To take the potential endogeneity of BMI, percent body fat and waist circumference into account, it uses regional prevalence rate of obesity as our instrumental variable and uses Control function approach to tackle this problem.
  The results of seminonparametric model indicate an inverted U-shaped curve for the effects of BMI, percent body fat or waist circumference on employment for men, especially significant in the waist circumference model. On the other hand, the results show a negative linear effect for the impact of BMI, percent body fat or waist circumference on employment for women, and they are all significant. The results of seminonparametric estimation of bivariate binary-choice model indicate that both men and women whose BMI is greater than or equal to 30 have significantly lower probability of employment. However, we only find significantly negative impact of percent body fat obesity and central obesity on employment among women. In the three measures of obesity, central obesity has the greatest impact on employment for woman.
  This study, furthermore, attempts to use obesity-related diseases--hypertension and diabetes--as control variables. To take the potential endogeneity of hypertension and diabetes into account, it uses regional prevalence rate of hypertension and diabetes as instrumental variables, and it, again, uses Control function approach to tackle this problem. After controlling for those two health conditions, it finds that the impact of obesity on employment is slightly weakened, in general.
  If we only use BMI as a measure of obesity, obesity will have the negative impact on labor market outcomes for both men and women. However, if we further consider the impact of percent body fat or waist circumference on employment, we not only capture an inverted U-shaped curve for the effects of waist circumference on employment for men, but also find that obesity will negatively affect women relatively more than men.
第三語言摘要
論文目次
目錄

第一章 緒論1
第二章 文獻回顧6
第三章 資料來源和變數定義12
第一節 資料來源12
第二節 樣本篩選14
第三節 變數定義與敘述統計18
第四章 實證模型設定28
第五章 實證結果與分析33
第一節 BMI、PBF和腰圍對就業的影響33
第二節 肥胖對就業的影響47
第三節 討論53
第六章 結論59
第一節 結論59
第二節 研究限制與未來研究方向62
參考文獻63
附錄68


圖表目錄

表 1 體型與勞動市場結果文獻比較表10
表 2 變數概述表24
表 3 男性敘述統計表(已調整權重)26
表 4 女性敘述統計表(已調整權重)27
表 5 男性SNP模型估計結果(不控制疾病下)36
表 6 男性SNP模型估計結果2 (不控制疾病下)38
表 7 女性SNP模型估計結果(不控制疾病下)40
表 8 女性SNP模型估計結果2 (不控制疾病下)42
表 9 男性SNP2模型估計結果(不控制疾病下)49
表 10 女性SNP2模型估計結果(不控制疾病下)51
表 11 男女肥胖(PBF2)的SNP2模型估計結果(不控制疾病下)55
表 12 男女肥胖(腰圍2)的SNP2模型估計結果(不控制疾病下)57

圖 1  1999~2012年美國15歲以上就業率4
圖 2  1999~2012年美國15歲以上男性就業率4
圖 3  1999~2012年美國15歲以上女性就業率5
圖 4  18~49歲,BMI密度分佈圖15
圖 5  18~49歲,體脂肪百分比密度分佈圖15
圖 6  18~49歲,腰圍密度分佈圖16
圖 7  18~49歲,男女BMI密度分佈圖16
圖 8  18~49歲,男女體脂肪百分比密度分佈圖17
圖 9  18~49歲,男女腰圍密度分佈圖17
圖 10 男性BMI與就業的邊際效果圖形(不控制疾病下)44
圖 11 男性PBF與就業的邊際效果圖形(不控制疾病下)44
圖 12 男性腰圍與就業的邊際效果圖形(不控制疾病下)45
圖 13 女性BMI與就業的邊際效果圖形(不控制疾病下)45
圖 14 女性PBF與就業的邊際效果圖形(不控制疾病下)46
圖 15 女性腰圍與就業的邊際效果圖形(不控制疾病下)46

附表 1 男性敘述統計表(未調整權重)68
附表 2 女性敘述統計表(未調整權重)69
附表 3 男性SNP模型估計結果(控制疾病下)70
附表 4 男性SNP模型估計結果2 (控制疾病下)72
附表 5 女性SNP模型估計結果(控制疾病下)74
附表 6 女性SNP模型估計結果2 (控制疾病下)76
附表 7 男性IV Probit模型估計結果(不控制疾病下)81
附表 8 女性IV Probit模型估計結果(不控制疾病下)82
附表 9 男性IV Probit模型估計結果(控制疾病下)83
附表 10 女性IV Probit模型估計結果(控制疾病下)84
附表 11 男性SNP2模型估計結果(控制疾病下)85
附表 12 女性SNP2估計結果(控制疾病下)87
附表 13 男女肥胖(PBF2)的SNP2模型估計結果(控制疾病下)89
附表 14 男女肥胖(腰圍2)的SNP2模型估計結果(控制疾病下)91
附表 15 男性Bivariate Probit模型估計結果(不控制疾病下)93
附表 16 女性Bivariate Probit模型估計結果(不控制疾病下)94
附表 17 男性Bivariate Probit模型估計結果(控制疾病下)95
附表 18 女性Bivariate Probit模型估計結果(控制疾病下)96

附圖 1 男性BMI與就業的邊際效果圖形(控制疾病下)78
附圖 2 男性PBF與就業的邊際效果圖形(控制疾病下)78
附圖 3 男性腰圍與就業的邊際效果圖形(控制疾病下)79
附圖 4 女性BMI與就業的邊際效果圖形(控制疾病下)79
附圖 5 女性PBF與就業的邊際效果圖形(控制疾病下)80
附圖 6 女性腰圍與就業的邊際效果圖形(控制疾病下)80
參考文獻
李冠威. (2013). 體型對職業的影響─ 以半無母數模型分析. 淡江大學產業經濟學系碩士班學位論文.
侯季志. (2012). 體型對失業的影響-以半無母數分析. 淡江大學產業經濟學系碩士班學位論文, , 1-125.
許雅棠、胡登淵、林東瓏 (2011). 相對體型對薪資的影響: 台灣老少群體的半母數分析. 台灣經濟學年會.
成人肥胖率38% 首次下降。中時電子報。2014年2月27日,取自 http://life.chinatimes.com/LifeContent/1413/20140227003461.html
Asgeirsdottir, T. L. Obesity and employment: The case of Iceland. Working Paper, University of Miami.
Asgeirsdottir, T. L. (2011). Do body weight and gender shape the work force? The case of Iceland. Economics & Human Biology, 9(2), 148-156. 
Baum, C. L., & Ford, W. F. (2004). The wage effects of obesity: A longitudinal study. Health Economics, 13(9), 885-899. 
Berghofer, A., Pischon, T., Reinhold, T., Apovian, C. M., Sharma, A. M., & Willich, S. N. (2008). Obesity prevalence from a European perspective: A systematic review. BMC Public Health, 8(1), 200. 
Bozoyan, C., & Wolbring, T. (2011). Fat, muscles, and wages. Economics & Human Biology, 9(4), 356-363. 
Burkhauser, R. V., & Cawley, J. (2008). Beyond BMI: The value of more accurate measures of fatness and obesity in social science research. Journal of Health Economics, 27(2), 519-529. 
Caliendo, M., & Lee, W. (2013). Fat chance! Obesity and the transition from unemployment to employment. Economics & Human Biology, 11(2), 121-133. 
Cawley, J., & Danziger, S. (2005). Morbid obesity and the transition from welfare to work. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24(4), 727-743. 
Deurenberg, P., Deurenberg‐Yap, M., & Guricci, S. (2002). Asians are different from caucasians and from each other in their body mass index/body fat per cent relationship. Obesity Reviews, 3(3), 141-146. 
Deurenberg, P., Weststrate, J. A., & Seidell, J. C. (1991). Body mass index as a measure of body fatness: Age-and sex-specific prediction formulas. British Journal of Nutrition, 65(02), 105-114. 
Gabler, S., Laisney, F., & Lechner, M. (1993). Seminonparametric estimation of binary-choice models with an application to labor-force participation. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 11(1), 61-80. 
Garcia, J., & Quintana-Domeque, C. (2007). Obesity, employment and wages in Europe. Advances in Health Economics and Health Services Research, 17, 187-217. 
Greve, J. (2008). Obesity and labor market outcomes in Denmark. Economics & Human Biology, 6(3), 350-362. 
Johansson, E., Bockerman, P., Kiiskinen, U., & Heliovaara, M. (2009). Obesity and labour market success in Finland: The difference between having a high BMI and being fat. Economics & Human Biology, 7(1), 36-45. 
Johansson, E., Bockerman, P., Kiiskinen, U., & Heliovaara, M. (2009). Obesity and labour market success in Finland: The difference between having a high BMI and being fat. Economics & Human Biology, 7(1), 36-45. 
Johar, M., & Katayama, H. (2012). Quantile regression analysis of body mass and wages. Health Economics, 21(5), 597-611. 
Jonsdottir, S., & Asgeirsdottir, T. L. (2013). The effect of job loss on body weight during an economic collapse. The European Journal of Health Economics,1-10. 
Komlos, J., Smith, P. K., & Bogin, B. (2004). Obesity and the rate of time preference: Is there a connection? Journal of Biosocial Science, 36(2), 209-219. 
Mora, T. (2010). BMI and Spanish labour status: Evidence by gender from the city of Barcelona. The European Journal of Health Economics, 11(3), 239-253. 
Morris, S. (2006). Body mass index and occupational attainment. Journal of Health Economics, 25(2), 347-364. 
Morris, S. (2007). The impact of obesity on employment. Labour Economics, 14(3), 413-433. 
Mosca, I. (2013). Body mass index, waist circumference and employment: Evidence from older Irish adults. Economics & Human Biology, 11(4), 522-533. 
Offer, A. (2001). Body weight and self-control in the United States and Britain since the 1950s. Social History of Medicine, 14(1), 79-106. 
Ogden, C. L., Carroll, M. D., Kit, B. K., & Flegal, K. M. (2014). Prevalence of childhood and adult obesity in the United States, 2011-2012. Jama, 311(8), 806-814. 
Pagan, J. A., & Davila, A. (1997). Obesity, occupational attainment, and earnings: Consequences of obesity. Social Science Quarterly, 78(3), 756-770. 
Paraponaris, A., Saliba, B., & Ventelou, B. (2005). Obesity, weight status and employability: Empirical evidence from a French national survey. Economics & Human Biology, 3(2), 241-258. 
Pi‐Sunyer, F. X. (2002). The obesity epidemic: Pathophysiology and consequences of obesity. Obesity Research, 10(S12), 97S-104S. 
Prentice, A. M., & Jebb, S. A. (2001). Beyond body mass index. Obesity Reviews, 2(3), 141-147. 
Renna, F., & Thakur, N. (2010). Direct and indirect effects of obesity on US labor market outcomes of older working age adults. Social Science & Medicine, 71(2), 405-413. 
Tunceli, K., Li, K., & Williams, L. K. (2006). Long-term effects of obesity on employment and work limitations among U.S. adults, 1986 to 1999. Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.), 14(9), 1637-1646. Doi: 14/9/1637 [pii] 
Wada, R., & Tekin, E. (2010). Body composition and wages. Economics & Human Biology, 8(2), 242-254. 
Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT press.
論文全文使用權限
校內
校內紙本論文立即公開
同意電子論文全文授權校園內公開
校內電子論文立即公開
校外
同意授權
校外電子論文立即公開

如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信