系統識別號 | U0002-1807200609293000 |
---|---|
DOI | 10.6846/TKU.2006.00518 |
論文名稱(中文) | 戲劇表演對臺灣以英語為外語學習者的學習動機的影響與成效: 以大一學生為例 |
論文名稱(英文) | THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ROLE-PLAYING ON TAIWAN EFL LEARNER’S MOTIVATION: A CASE STUDY OF UNIVERSITY FRESHMEN |
第三語言論文名稱 | |
校院名稱 | 淡江大學 |
系所名稱(中文) | 英文學系碩士班 |
系所名稱(英文) | Department of English |
外國學位學校名稱 | |
外國學位學院名稱 | |
外國學位研究所名稱 | |
學年度 | 94 |
學期 | 2 |
出版年 | 95 |
研究生(中文) | 余佳紋 |
研究生(英文) | Chia-Wen Yu |
學號 | 692010167 |
學位類別 | 碩士 |
語言別 | 英文 |
第二語言別 | |
口試日期 | 2006-05-29 |
論文頁數 | 119頁 |
口試委員 |
指導教授
-
范瑞玲(fahn@mail.tku.edu.tw)
委員 - 陳純音(chunyin@ntnu.edu.tw) 委員 - 王藹玲(wanga@mail.tku.edu.tw) |
關鍵字(中) |
溝通式教學法 戲劇表演 學習動機 |
關鍵字(英) |
communicative language teaching role-playing motivation |
第三語言關鍵字 | |
學科別分類 | |
中文摘要 |
第二次世界大戰之後,隨著科技的發達,語言實驗室逐漸普及於各大學,而大一語練課目前已成為大學必修課程之一。姚崇昆教授於1996年調查大一學生對於目前「英聽課程」之教學目標、教材教法及學習活動的看法。結果顯示,大部分學生希望英聽課能多增加一些開口練習的機會,以提升他們的學習動機和口語能力。根據姚崇昆教授的研究結果,本研究調查英聽課程在加入以戲劇表演為主的溝通式活動後,是否有助於提升學生的學習動機。 本研究的對象為130位淡江大學三個大一英聽班級的學生,根據學生托福聽力成績,選出程度在前27%和後27%者為對象,共70位,其中有效問卷60份。研究方法包含為期一學期的戲劇表演會話活動、問卷調查和訪談。目的在比較兩組學生在教學後的學習動機和聽講能力是否有進步,並探討學生對於戲劇表演會話活動的感想。 實驗結果顯示,雖然兩組學生在問卷方面量化的分析上並無顯著性差異,但大多數受試者於訪談時,均表示在接受以戲劇表演為主的會話活動後,口語能力有明顯的提升。根據研究結果,本研究提供相關建議給採用戲劇表演為主的會話活動教師,幫助教師解決可能遇到的困難。此外,希望藉此研究喚起課程設計者應以學習者的需求為第一考量,以提升學生的學習動機。 關鍵字:溝通式教學法、戲劇表演、學習動機 |
英文摘要 |
The language drill course was incorporated into the college curriculum at the end of World WarⅡ (Eichholz, 1953) and has not undergone substantive modifications ever since. To explore whether the current Language Drill Course still served as an effective course to conform to learners’ needs, Yao (1996) conducted a survey. The results showed that students anticipated more communicative tasks and interaction in the classroom. Based on Yao’s study, the current study tried to investigate whether adopting Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) with a focus on role-playing in the Drill Course can enhance learner’s motivation. Sixty freshmen in Tamkang University were recruited as subjects and were divided into the high-proficiency and low-proficiency groups. All of the subjects received CLT instruction with weekly role-playing activities. The questionnaires and follow-up interviews were administered to investigate students’ motivational change and attitudes and perceptions toward role-playing. Although the quantitative data did not yield significant differences mostly, the qualitative results were more encouraging. The findings indicated that students held positive attitude toward role-playing, and reported that they were more willing to speak the target language and benefited in oral proficiency after one-semester instruction. Therefore, it is hoped that through this study, the curriculum of the Freshman Language Drill Course can receive more attention, to be designed based on learners’ needs. |
第三語言摘要 | |
論文目次 |
TABLE OF CONTESTS Page CHINESE ABSTRACT----------------------------------------------------------------------i ENGLISH ABSTRACT----------------------------------------------------------------------ii AKNOWLEDGEMENTS-------------------------------------------------------------------iii TABLE OF CONTENTS--------------------------------------------------------------------iv LIST OF TABLES----------------------------------------------------------------------------vii LIST OF FIGURES---------------------------------------------------------------------------viii CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background--------------------------------------------------------------------------------1 1.2 Research Problem------------------------------------------------------------------------3 1.3 Purpose of the Study---------------------------------------------------------------------7 1.4 Research Questions---------------------------------------------------------------------- 8 1.5 Significance of the Study--------------------------------------------------------------- 8 1.6 Definition of Terms-------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 1.7 Organization of the Study -------------------------------------------------------------11 2. REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE 2.1 Theoretical Background of Communicative Language Teaching----------------12 2.2 Pedagogical Applications of Communicative Language Teaching---------------17 2.2.1 Characteristics of Communicative Language Teaching---------------------18 2.2.2 Teacher Role----------------------------------------------------------------------21 2.2.3 Learner Role----------------------------------------------------------------------22 2.2.4 Syllabus----------------------------------------------------------------------------24 2.2.5 Comparison between Traditional and Communicative Approaches-------25 2.3 Communicative Activities-------------------------------------------------------------27 2.3.1 Role-Playing----------------------------------------------------------------------28 2.3.2 Advantages of Adopting Role-Playing in Language Classroom-----------29 2.3.3 Administering Role-Playing----------------------------------------------------30 2.3.4 Promoting Listening and Speaking in the Drill Course---------------------33 2.4 Motivation--------------------------------------------------------------------------------36 2.4.1 Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation---------------------------------------------37 2.4.2 Integrative and Instrumental Motivation--------------------------------------38 2.4.3 Measurement of Motivation----------------------------------------------------39 2.5 Summary of Chapter Two--------------------------------------------------------------40 3. METHODOLOGY 3.1 Subjects-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------42 3.2 Instruments-------------------------------------------------------------------------------43 3.3 Treatment---------------------------------------------------------------------------------45 3.4 Procedures--------------------------------------------------------------------------------47 3.5 Data Collection and Analysis----------------------------------------------------------50 4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 4.1 Results of the Questionnaires----------------------------------------------------------51 4.2.1 Instrumental Motivation---------------------------------------------------------52 4.2.2 Integrative Motivation-----------------------------------------------------------53 4.2.3 Self-Evaluation of Speaking and Listening Proficiency--------------------54 4.2 Interviews with the Participants-------------------------------------------------------57 4.3 Discussions of the Findings------------------------------------------------------------60 4.3.1 Role-Playing and Motivation---------------------------------------------------61 4.3.2 Self-Evaluation of Speaking and Listening Proficiency --------------------63 4.3.3 The Transitional Process---------------------------------------------------------65 4.3.4 Attitudes and Perceptions toward Role-Playing------------------------------66 4.4 Summary of Chapter Four-------------------------------------------------------------67 5. SUMMARY, SUGGESTIONS, AND CONCLUSIONS 5.1 Summary of the Study------------------------------------------------------------------69 5.2 Pedagogical Implications--------------------------------------------------------------71 5.3 Limitations and Suggestions for Future Study--------------------------------------73 5.4 Conclusion-------------------------------------------------------------------------------75 REFERENCES----------------------------------------------------------------------------------77 APPENDIX A: English Version of Questionnaire-----------------------------------------88 APPENDIX B: Chinese Version of Questionnaire-----------------------------------------91 APPENDIX C: Questions for Interview (English Version) ------------------------------93 APPENDIX D: Questions for Interview (Chinese Version) ------------------------------94 APPENDIX E: Syllabus-----------------------------------------------------------------------95 APPENDIX F: Self-Introduction-------------------------------------------------------------96 APPENDIX G: Air Travel---------------------------------------------------------------------97 APPENDIX H: City Transportation----------------------------------------------------------99 APPENDIX I: Renting a Car----------------------------------------------------------------101 APPENDIX J: Restaurants ------------------------------------------------------------------104 APPENDX K: Go Shopping-----------------------------------------------------------------107 APPENDX L: Health Problems-------------------------------------------------------------113 APPENDX M: Job Interview----------------------------------------------------------------117 LIST OF TABLES Page Table 1. Independent Samples T Test of Instrumental Motivation ----------------------52 Table 2. Instrumental Motivation ------------------------------------------------------------53 Table 3. Independent Samples T Test of Integrative Motivation ------------------------53 Table 4. Integrative Motivation --------------------------------------------------------------54 Table 5. Self-Evaluation of Speaking and Listening Proficiency------------------------55 LIST OF FIGURES Page Figure 1. Self-Evaluation of Speaking-------------------------------------------------------56 Figure 2. Self-Evaluation of Listening-------------------------------------------------------57 |
參考文獻 |
References ACRO. (2003). Mastering the TOEFL CBT. U.S.A: Thomson Learning. Asher, J. (1972). Children’s first language as model of second language learning. Modern Language Journal, 56, 133-139. Au, S. Y. (1998). A critical appraisal of Gardner’s social psychological theory of second-language (L2) learning. Language learning, 38, 75-100. Bassano, S. K. & Christison, M. A. (1987). Developing successful conversation groups. In M. H. Long & J. C. Richards (Ed.), Methodology in TESOL. (pp. 201-207). Boston: Heinle & Heinel. Belmechri, F. & Hummel, K. (1998). Orientations and motivation in the acquisition of English as a second language among high school students in Quebec city. Language Learning, 48(2), 219-244. Bern, M. (1990). Contexts of competence: English language teaching in non-native contexts. New York: Plenum. Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. New York: Holt. Breen, M. P. & Candlin, C. N. (1980). The essentials of a communicative curriculum in language teaching. Applied Linguistics, 1, 89-112. Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents. Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents. Brumfit, C. (1984). Communicative methodology in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Bruner, J. S. (1962). On knowing: Essays for the left hand. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Bygate, M. (1987). Speaking. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Bygate, M. (2001). Speaking. In R. Carter & D. Nunan (Ed.), Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages. (pp.14-20). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Canale, M & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1, 1-47. Chang, L. Y. (2001). Communicative language teaching: Taiwan senior high school English teachers’ beliefs and classroom practices. Taipei: Tamkang University Press. Chang, S. T. (1988). Audiolingual education and teaching media. Taipei: Wunan. Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspect of the theory of syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press. Chomsky, N. (1966). Linguistic theory. Reprinted in J.P.B. Allen & P. Van Buren (eds.), Chomsky: Selected readings. (pp. 152-159). London: Oxford University Press. Chou, M. C. & Kai, I. H. (1996). The difficulties and problems of applying language learning simulations in the large EFL conversation class. In C. L. Chern & S. Y. Huang (Ed.), Papers from the 12th conference on English teaching and learning in the Republic of China. (pp. 177-201). Taipei: Crane. Christopher, E. M. & Smith, L. E. (1990). Shaping the content of simulation/ games. In D. Crookall & R. L. Oxford (Eds.), Simulation, gaming, and language learning. (pp.151-158). New York: Newbury House. Cioffari, V. (1961). What can we expect from the language laboratory? The Modern Language Journal, 45(1), 3-9. Crookall, P. & Oxford, R.L. (1990). Linking language learning and simulation/ game. In D. Crookall & R. L. Oxford (Eds.), Simulation, gaming, and language learning. (pp.151-158). New York: Newbury House. Deci, E. L. & Ray, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum. Diller, E & Newmark, G. (1964). Emphasizing the audio in the audio-lingual approach. The Modern Language Journal, 48(1), 18-20. Dougill, J. (1987). Drama activities for language learning. London: Macmillan. Dörnyei, Z. (1994). Motivation and motivating in the foreign language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 78(3), 273-284. Dörnyei, Z. and Otto, I. (1998). Motivation in action: A process model of L2 motivation. Working Papers in Applied Linguistics, 4, 43-69. Dubin, F. & Olshtain, E. (1986). Course design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Dunkel, P. A. (1986). Developing listening fluency in L2: Theoretical principles and pedagogical considerations. The Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 99-106. Eichholz, E. (1953). Function and equipment of a language laboratory. The Modern Language Journal, 37(4), 181-184. Ehrmann, E. L. (1963). Listening comprehension: in the teaching of a foreign language. The Modern Language Journal, 47(1), 18-20. Fulton, R. J. (1959). Language laboratories develop in listening ear. The Modern Language Journal, 43(5), 224-225. Furness, E. L. (1952). Techniques for the teaching of listening. The Modern Language Journal, 36(3), 124-128. Gardner, R. (1960). Motivational variables in second-language acquisition. Montreal: McGill University. Gardner, R. (1985). The attitude/motivation test batter: Technical report [On-line]. http://publish.uwo.ca/~gardner/ Gardner, R. (2005). The Socio-educational Model of Second Language Acquisition: A Research Paradigm [On-line]. http://publish.uwo.ca/~gardner/ Gardner, R.& Lalonde, R. (1990). Social psychological considerations. In D. Crookall & R. L. Oxford (Eds.), Simulation, gaming, and language learning. (pp.151-158). New York: Newbury House. Gardner, R. & Lambert, W. (1972). Attitudes and motivation in second language learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House. Gardner, R. & MacIntyre, P. (1991). An instrumental motivation in language study: Who says it isn’t effective? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 57-72. Gardner, R.C., Smythe, P.C. and R. Clement. (1979). Intensive second language study in a bilingual milieu-an investigation of attitudes, motivation and language proficiency. Language Learning, 29, 305-20. Gordon, B. R. (1953). Integration of laboratory and classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 37(2), 72-75. Halliday, M. A. K. (1975). Learning how to mean: Explorations in the development of language. London: Edward Arnold. Hocking, E. (1969). The laboratory in perspective: teachers, strategies, outcomes. The Modern Language Journal, 53(6), 404-410. Horner, D. & McGinley, K. (1990).Running simulation/games: A step-by-step guide. In D. Crookall & R. L. Oxford (Eds.), Simulation, gaming, and language learning. (pp.151-158). New York: Newbury House. Hsu, W. H. (2005). Group work, class participation, and oral English development in a college EFL classroom. NSC 92-2411-H-002-070. Huang, S. C. (2004). The effect of a reading & writing approach to EFL instruction on students’ motivation. Taipei: National Taiwan Normal University. Hymes, D. H. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Ed.), Sociolinguistics: Selected reading. (pp. 269-293). Harmondsworth, England: Penguin. Kalivoda, T. B. (1972). An individual study course for facilitating advanced oral skills. The Modern Language Journal, 56(8), 492-495. Kaplan, J. E. (1980). Video in the classroom: A guide to creative television. New York: Knowledge Industry. Kohonen, V. (1992). Experimental learning: second language learning as language cooperative learner education. In D. Nunan (Ed.), Collaborative language learning and teaching. (pp. 14-39). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, N J: Prentice Hall Regents. Ladousse, G. P. (1987). Role play. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Larsen-Freeman, D. (1986). Techniques and principles in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press Littlewood, W. (1981). Communicative language teaching: An introduction. New York: Cambridge University Press. Locke, W. N. (1965). The future of language laboratories. The Modern Language Journal, 49(5), 294-304. Long, D. R. (1989). Second language listening comprehension: A schema-theoretic perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 73(1), 32-40. LTTC (2003). A statistic report of the GEPT high-intermediate level. Taipei: LTTC. Madsen, H.S. (1983). Techniques in testing. New York: Oxford University Press. Maley, A. & Duff, A. (1982). Drama techniques in language learning: A resource book of communication activities for language teacher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Maslow, A. H. (1970). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper & Row. Mayo, H. N. (1963). Class, laboratory, and credit hours in beginning modern Language. The Modern Language Journal, 47(1), 23-25. Mc Kay, S. L. (1980). On notional syllabuses. The Modern Language Journal, 62(2), 179-186. Melrose, R. (1991). The communicative syllabus. London: Pinter. Mezeske, B. (2004). Shifting paradigms? Don’t forget to tell your students. The Teaching Professor, 18(7), 1. Mustard, H. & Tudisco, A. (1959). The foreign language laboratory in colleges and universities: A partial survey of its instructional use. The Modern Language Journal, 43(7), 332-340. Nunan, D. (1991a). Communicative tasks and the language curriculum. TESOL Quarterly, 25, 279-295. Nunan, D. (1999). Second language teaching and learning. Boston: Heinle & Heinle. Olsen, T. & Christian, G. (1966). The grindstone experiment: Thirty one hours. Toronto: Canadian Friends Service Committee. Peng, I. N. (2002). EFL motivation and strategy use among Taiwanese senior high school learners. Taipei: National Taiwan Normal University. Pimsleur, P. (1959). The functions of the language laboratory. The Modern Language Journal, 43(1), 11-15. Postovsky, V. A. (1981). The priority of aural comprehension in the language acquisition process. In H. Winitz (Ed.), Approach to foreign language instruction. Rowley, MA: Newbury House. Quinn, T. (1984). Functional approaches in language pedagogy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 5, 60-80. Richard-Amato, P. (1996). Making it happen: Interaction in the second language classroom: From theory to practice. White Plains, NY: Addison-Wesley. Richards, J. C. (1999). The language teaching matrix. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Richards, J. C. & Rogers, T. S. (1986). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Richards, J. C. (2003). Tactics for listening. New York: Oxford University Press. Rivers, W. M. (1966). Listening comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 50(4), 196-204. Rivers, W. M. (1968). Teaching foreign-language skills. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Rost, M. (2002). Teaching and researching listening. Great Britain: Pearson Education. Savigon, S. J. (1983). Communicative competence: Theory and classroom practice. Ready, MA: Addison-Wesley. Savignon, S. J. (2001). Communicative language teaching. Theory into Practice, 87(26), 235-242. Savignon, S. J. (2003). Teaching English as communication: a global perspective. World Englishes, 22(1), 55-66. Savignon, S. J. (2003). Communicative language teaching in EFL contexts: Learner attitudes and perceptions. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 41(3), 223-249. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. Spaulding, C. L. (1992). Motivation in the classroom. U.S.A: McGraw-Hill. Stack, E. M. (1964). Laboratories: The effectiveness controversy. The Modern Language Journal, 48(4), 189-194. Stack, E. M. (1971). The language laboratory and modern language teaching. New York: Oxford University Press. Tompkins, P. K. (1998). Role playing/simulation [On-line]. The Internet TESL Journal, 4(8), August. http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Tompkins-RolePlaying.html Widdowson, H. G. (1978). Teaching language as communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Widdowson, H. G. (1994). The teaching of English as a communication. In C. J Brumfit & K. Johnson (Ed.), The communicative approaches to language teaching. (pp. 117-121). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Wilkins, D. A. (1976). Notional syllabuses. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Willis, J. (1996). A Framework for task-based learning. London: Longman. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge: Harvard University. Yao , C. K. (1996). A case study on language lab curriculum need at National Chunghsing University. In C. L. Chern & S. Y. Huang (Ed.), Papers from the 12th conference on English teaching and learning in the Republic of China. (pp. 80-96). Taipei: Crane. Yardley-Matwiejczuk, K. M. (1997). Role play. London: Sage. |
論文全文使用權限 |
如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信