§ 瀏覽學位論文書目資料
系統識別號 U0002-1806202113522000
DOI 10.6846/TKU.2021.00417
論文名稱(中文) 責任分攤查核意見是否影響集團企業揭露關鍵查核事項之價值攸關性
論文名稱(英文) The impact of shared audit opinions on the value relevance of affiliate business group disclosures of key audit matters
第三語言論文名稱
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中文) 會計學系碩士班
系所名稱(英文) Department of Accounting
外國學位學校名稱
外國學位學院名稱
外國學位研究所名稱
學年度 109
學期 2
出版年 110
研究生(中文) 林湘芩
研究生(英文) Hsiang-Chin Lin
學號 608600010
學位類別 碩士
語言別 繁體中文
第二語言別
口試日期 2021-06-11
論文頁數 51頁
口試委員 指導教授 - 張瑀珊
委員 - 薛明賢
委員 - 江家瑜
關鍵字(中) 關鍵查核事項
責任分攤查核意見
集團企業
價值攸關性
審計產業專家
關鍵字(英) Key audit matter
Shared audit opinion
Affiliated business groups
Value relevance
Auditor industry specialization
第三語言關鍵字
學科別分類
中文摘要
本研究旨在探討會計師為集團企業出具責任分攤查核意見是否會對關鍵查核事項之價值攸關性產生影響。本研究以Feltham and Ohlson (1995)之股權評價模型進行研究,並進一步將樣本區分為水平整合或垂直整合、是否存在財務風險,以及是否採用責任分攤查核意見等進行區分,結果發現若採用責任分攤查核意見,由產業專家查核之關鍵查核事項揭露存貨評價具有負向之價值攸關性,但在未採用之情況下則不具價值攸關性,顯示採用責任分攤查核意見會有降低審計品質之疑慮,而使股價下降。若進一步依照水平整合或垂直整合區分後,發現由產業專家查核之關鍵查核事項揭露存貨評價及收入評價之公司,僅在採用責任分攤式查核意見且集團企業為水平整合之情況下,會有顯著為負之價值攸關性,顯示水平整合較容易受到公司無法控制之風險影響,進而降低股價。此外,依是否存有財務風險區分,發現僅在未採用責任分攤且無財務風險之情況下,由產業專家查核之關鍵查核事項揭露減損具有正向之價值攸關性,代表在此情況下較能獲得投資人的信賴。再者,本研究進一步探討同時揭露多項關鍵查核事項與僅考慮一項關鍵查核事項之差異,發現兩者之結果一致,顯示股價不會受揭露一項或多項關鍵查核事項而改變。透過本文實證結果,可知集團企業之經營模式及其財務風險也是投資人考量之重要因素之一。
英文摘要
This study aims to explore whether shared audit opinions issued by audit partners to affiliated business groups affect the value relevance of key audit matters. This study is conducted according to the valuation model of Feltham and Ohlson (1995), and further divides the samples according to criteria such as horizontal integration or vertical integration, whether financial risk exists, and whether shared audit opinions are used. Results show that if shared audit opinions are used through auditor industry specialization key audit matter disclosure, then stock valuation has a negative value relevance, but if shared audit opinions are not used then there is no value relevance, showing that the use of shared audit opinions carries with it concerns about lowering audit quality, thereby lowering stock price. Furthermore, after distinguishing horizontal integration from vertical integration, auditor industry specialization key audit matters reveal that companies with inventory evaluation and income evaluation have significant negative value relevance merely by using shared audit opinions and horizontally integrated affiliated business groups--demonstrating that horizontal integration is more susceptible to risks beyond the company’s control, thereby lowering stock price. In addition, depending on whether a distinction between financial risks exists, findings show that by merely not using shared audit opinions and having no financial risk, auditor industry specialization key audit matter disclosure impairment has positive value relevance, meaning that investor trust will be easier to earn under such circumstances. Moreover, this study further explored the difference between exposing multiple key audit matters at the same time and considering only one key audit matters, and found that the results of the two are consistent, indicating that the stock price will not be changed by the disclosure of one or more key audit matters. Through the empirical results of this study, we can see that the business model and financial risks of affiliate business groups are also one of the important factors considered by investors.
第三語言摘要
論文目次
第壹章 緒論	1
第一節 研究背景與動機	1
第二節 研究目的	4
第三節 研究架構與流程	4
第貳章 文獻探討與假說發展	6
第一節 集團企業之定義及文獻	6
第二節 查核報告、關鍵查核事項及其價值攸關性	10
第三節 審計產業專家	16
第四節 責任分攤查核意見	18
第參章 研究方法	21
第一節 研究模型	21
第二節 研究變數定義	22
第三節 資料來源與樣本分佈	23
第肆章 實證結果與分析	25
第一節 敘述性統計與t檢定結果	25
第二節 迴歸分析	31
第三節 其他分析	35
第四節 敏感性分析	40
第伍章 結論與建議	44
參考文獻	46
 
圖目錄
圖 1 研究架構流程圖	5
 
表目錄
表 1 長榮集團之分子公司	9
表 2 樣本分布表	24
表 3 敘述性統計	26
表 4 T test 分析結果	29
表 5 相關係數分析	30
表 6 關鍵查核事項、審計產業專家之價值攸關性	32
表 7 責任分攤查核意見之關鍵查核事項、審計產業專家之價值攸關性	33
表 8 責任分攤查核意見之關鍵查核事項、審計產業專家之價值攸關性_集團區分為水平整合與垂直整合	35
表 9 責任分攤查核意見之關鍵查核事項、審計產業專家之價值攸關性_集團區分為是否存在財務風險	37
表 10 關鍵查核事項、審計產業專家之價值攸關性_揭露兩項以上關鍵查核事項	39
表 11 責任分攤查核意見之關鍵查核事項、審計產業專家之價值攸關性_減損區分為有形資產或無形資產	40
表 12 關鍵查核事項、審計產業專家之價值攸關性_以次年三月底之股票收盤價衡量	41
表 13 責任分攤查核意見之關鍵查核事項、審計產業專家之價值攸關性_以次年三月底之股票收盤價衡量	42
參考文獻
中文文獻:
中華徵信所,2018,台灣地區大型集團企業研究。
王光正與蔡思慧,2007,系統產品的整合與競爭,經濟論文叢刊,第35卷第2期:117-153。
李建然、陳信吉與黃皪瑩,2019,集團間責任分擔式查核報告與財務報表重編之關聯性,證券市場發行季刊,第31卷第3期:125-157。
李建然、陳信吉與蔡宗益,2020,責任分攤式查核意見與集團企業合併財務報表審計品質關聯性:以會計師調整數為衡量基礎,臺大管理論叢,第30卷第2期:37-70。
李建然與林秀鳳,2013,大型會計師事務所之審計品質真的比非大型會計師事務所好嗎?從抑制盈餘管理的角度探討—控制自我選擇偏誤的重要性,中華會計學刊,第9卷第1期:77-110。
李建然與陳信吉,2020,集團企業責任分攤式查核報告與債務資金成本,證券市場發展季刊,第32卷第4期:1-30。
李桓伊、陳淑萍、紀信義與張明皓,2021,採用新式查核報告對債務資金成本之影響,台灣管理學刊,第21卷第1期:51-70。
杜榮瑞、許文馨與鄧雨賢,2017,企業社會責任報告書之確信服務提供者、確信程度及產業專家與可信度之關聯:實證研究,中華會計學刊,第12卷特刊:503-536。
林文玲與傅鍾仁,2011,企業社會責任之揭露對會計資訊價值攸關性-以台灣資訊電子業上市公司為例,商管科技季刊,第12卷第2期:209-229。
姜家訓與楊雅雯,2005,會計師事務所之產業專精及查核年資與盈餘品質之關係,當代會計,第6卷第1期:23-60。
姜家訓與葉鴻銘,2008,公司多角化、分擔責任查核意見與應計數品質之關係,會計評論,第46期:67-105。
范宏書、陳慶隆與廖英任,2008,盈餘管理對會計資訊的相對價值攸關性之影響,管理與系統,第15卷第1期:93-136。
張瑞當、方俊儒與沈文華,2008,集團企業是否委託同一會計師事務所查核財務報表對其盈餘管理行為之影響,管理評論,第27卷第2期:29-52。
張瑞當、曾玉琦與廖浩雲,2011,集團企業資訊透明度與盈餘管理,商業現代化學刊,第6卷第2期:1-27。
陳建男與朱文儀,2012,大型集團企業之成員競爭優勢:資源、控制與內部市場,中山管理評論,第20卷第3期:775-809。
陳振遠、張智堯、王蘭芬與李文智,2004,應用Ohlson會計評價模型探究公司治理之價值攸關性-以台灣上市公司電子業為例,臺大管理論叢,第15卷第2期:123-141。
陳慶隆、翁佩瑜與范宏書,2016,機構投資者、盈餘平穩化與會計資訊價值攸關性,管理評論,第35卷第3期:1-27。
曾玉琦,2014,獨立董監、內部稽核與產業專家會計師對企業財務報導之影響,台灣管理學刊,第14卷第2期:21-49。
曾家璿、史雅男,2019,會計師產業專精與關鍵查核事項揭露之關聯,中華會計學刊,第15卷第1期:37-76。
黃仲豪,2016,推動我國採用新式會計師查核報告—由英國經驗論起,證券暨期貨月刊,第34卷第9期:5-15。
廖秀梅與陳依婷,2010,資訊揭露透明度、家族控制因素與盈餘價值攸關性,會計學報,第2卷第2期:1-23。
劉嘉雯、王泰昌與賴信蒼,2009,訴訟風險與大型會計師事務所之客戶財務風險可接受水準,台大管理論叢,第20卷第1期:1-40。
劉福運、林岳喬與陳信吉,2018,集團企業責任分攤式查核意見與債信評等,企業管理學報,第119期:103-132。
瞿宛文與洪嘉瑜,2002,自由化與企業集團化的趨勢,台灣社會研究季刊,第47期:33-83。
簡俱揚與陳玉梅,2009,產業審計專家與獨立董監事對新發行公司債資金成本的影響,當代會計,第10卷第1期:99-130。
羅芳怡與葉思辰,2015,開枝散葉或單兵作戰? 集團企業與非集團企業之比較,全球科技管理與教育期刊,第3卷第1期:13-27。
蘇裕惠、楊孟萍與洪湘閑,2021,會計師出具分攤責任式查核報告對審計公費之影響,會計審計論叢,第11卷第1期:33-68。
蘇裕惠與李冠儒,2020,關鍵查核事項的揭露數量對盈餘資訊內涵的影響,會計審計論叢,第10卷第1期:1-38。
英文文獻:
Alves Júnior, E. D., and F. C. Galdi. 2020. The informational relevance of key audit matters. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças 31 (82): 67-83.
Amir, E., and B. Lev. 1996. Value-relevance of nonfinancial information: The wireless communications industry. Journal of Accounting and Economics 22 (1-3): 3-30.
Bae, K. H., and S. W. Jeong. 2007. The value‐relevance of earnings and book value, ownership structure, and business group affiliation: Evidence from Korean business groups. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 34 (5-6): 740-766.
Ball, R., and P. Brown. 1968. An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers. Journal of Accounting Research 6 (2): 159-178.
Balsam, S., J. Krishnan, and J. S. Yang. 2003. Auditor industry specialization and earning quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 22 (2): 71-97.
Barth, M. E., W. H. Beaver, and W. R. Landsman. 2001. The relevance of the value relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting: Another view. Journal of Accounting and Economics 31 (1-30): 77-104.
Barth, M. E., W. R. Landsman, and M. H. Lang. 2008. International accounting standards and accounting quality. Journal of Accounting Research 46 (3): 467-498.
Bédard, J., N. Gonthier-Besacier, and A. Schatt. 2014. Costs and benefits of reporting key audit matters in the audit report: The French experience. Working Paper.
Blake, K., J. V. Carcello, N. J. Harrison, M. J. Head, B. E. Roper, A. Simpson, T. Sondhi, R. M. Tarola, L. E. Turner, M. Williams, and A. Yerger. 2011. Response of a subgroup of the PCAOB’s investor advisory group to the PCAOB’s concept release concerning reports on audited financial statements and related amendments to PCAOB standards. Current Issues in Auditing 5 (2): C21-C50.
Carson, E., R. Simnet, G. Trompeter, and A. Vanstraelen. 2014. The impact of other component auditors on the costs and quality of multinational group audits. Paper presented at the Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand (AFAANZ) Conference, Auckland, New Zealand.
Carver, B. T., and B. S. Trinkle. 2017. Nonprofessional investors’ reactions to the PCAOB’s proposed changes in the standard audit report. Working Paper.
Christensen, B. E., S. M. Glover, and C. J. Wolfe. 2014. Do critical audit matter paragraphs in the audit report change nonprofessional investors' decision to invest? Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 33 (4): 71-93.
Chung, C. N. 2001. Markets, culture and institutions: The emergence of large business groups in Taiwan, 1950s–1970s. Journal of management studies 38 (5): 719-745.
Church, B. K., S. M. Davis, S. A. McCracken. 2008. The auditor’s reporting model: A literature overview and research synthesis. Accounting Horizons 22 (1): 69-90.
Collins, D. W., E. L. Maydew, and I. S. Weiss. 1997. Changes in the value-relevance of earnings and book values over the past forty years. Journal of Accounting and Economics 24 (1): 39-67.
Craswell, A. T., J. R. Francis, and S. L. Taylor. 1995. Auditor brand name reputations and industries specializations. Journal of Accounting and Economics 20 (3): 297-322.
DeAngelo, L. E. 1981. Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics 3: 183-199.
Dee, C. C., A. Lulseged, and T. Zhang. 2012. Who did the audit? Investor perceptions and disclosures of other audit participants in PCAOB filings. Working Paper.
Dunn, K. A., and B. W. Mayhew. 2004. Audit firm industry specialization and client disclosure quality. Review of Accounting Studies 9 (1): 35-58.
Feltham, G. A., and J. A. Ohlson. 1995. Valuation and clean surplus accounting for operating and financial activities. Contemporary Accounting Research 11 (2): 689-731.
Ferreira, C., and A. I. Morais. 2020. Analysis of the relationship between company characteristics and key audit matters disclosed. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças 31 (83): 262-274.
Francis, J., and K. Schipper. 1999. Have financial statements lost their relevance? Journal of Accounting Research 37 (2): 319-352.
Gimbar, C., B. Hansen, and M. E. Ozlanski. 2016. Early evidence on the effects of critical audit matters on auditor liability. Current Issues In Auditing 10 (1): A24-A33.
Gold, A., M. Heilmann, C. Pott, and J. Rematzki. 2020. Do key audit matters impact financial reporting behavior? International Journal of Auditing 24 (2): 232-244.
Holthausen, R. W., and R. L. Watts. 2001. The relevance of the value-relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting. Journal of Accounting and Economics 31: 3-75.
Khanna, T., and W. J. Rivkin. 2001. Estimating the performance effects of business. Strategic Management Journal 22 (January): 45-74.
Kipp, P. C. 2017. The effect of expanded audit report disclosures on users’ confidence in the audit and the financial statements. University of South Florida. Retrieved from https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/6718.
Koehler, A., N. V. S. Ratzinger-Sakel, and J. Theis. 2016. The effects of key audit matters on the auditor’s report’s communicative value: experimental evidence from investment professionals and non-professional investors. Working Paper.
Leff, H. N. 1978. Industrial organizations and entrepreneurship in the developing countries: the economic groups. Economic Development and Cultural Change 26 (July): 661-675.
Lev, B., and P. Zarowin. 1999. The boundaries of financial reporting and how to extend them. Journal of Accounting Research 37 (2): 353-385.
O’Keefe, T. B., R. D. King, and K. M. Gaver. 1994. Audit fees, industry specialization, and compliance with GAAS reporting standards. Auditing 13 (2): 41-55.
Paglietti, P. 2009. Earnings management, timely loss recognition and value relevance in Europe following the IFRS mandatory adoption: evidence from Italian listed companies. Economia Aziendale Online 1 (4): 97-117.
Palmrose, Z. V. 1986. Audit fees and auditor size: Further evidence. Journal of Accounting Research 24 (3): 97-110.
Reid, L. C. 2015. Are auditor and audit committee report changes useful to investors? Evidence from the United Kingdom. Working Paper.
Romanus, R. N., J. J. Maher, and D. M. Fleming. 2008. Auditor industry specialization, auditor changes, and accounting restatements. Accounting Horizons 22 (4): 389-413.
Sirois, L. P., J. Bédard, and P. Bera. 2018. The informational value of key audit matters in the audit’s report: evidence from an eye-tracking study. Accounting Horizons 32 (2): 141-162.
Smith, K. W. 2019. Tell me more: A content analysis of expanded auditor reporting in the United Kingdom. Working Paper.
Trpeska, M., A. Atanasovski, and Z. B. Lazarevska. 2017. The relevance of financial information and contents of the new audit report for lending decisions of commercial banks. Accounting and Management Information Systems 16 (4): 455-471.
White, M. J. 2013. The path forward on disclosure. Retrieved from http://www.sec.gov/News/Speech/Detail/Speech/1370539878806#.Uzx2VPldV8E.
Yang, Y. J., and Q. L. Kweh. 2015. The effects of shared-opinion audit reports on perceptions of audit quality. Proceedings of the Fourth Asia-Pacific Conference on Global Business, Economics, Finance and Social Sciences (AP15 Malaysia Conference) 7-9 (August).
Zhi, X., and Z. Kang. 2021. Critical audit matters and stock price crash risk. Frontiers of Business Research in China 15 (1): 6.
論文全文使用權限
校內
校內紙本論文延後至2026-06-25公開
同意電子論文全文授權校園內公開
校內電子論文延後至2026-06-25公開
校內書目立即公開
校外
同意授權
校外電子論文延後至2026-06-25公開

如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信