§ 瀏覽學位論文書目資料
  
系統識別號 U0002-1806201515135700
DOI 10.6846/TKU.2015.00509
論文名稱(中文) 碳管理系統、生態效益與企業價值之關聯性
論文名稱(英文) The relationship of carbon management systems,eco-efficiency and firm value
第三語言論文名稱
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中文) 會計學系碩士班
系所名稱(英文) Department of Accounting
外國學位學校名稱
外國學位學院名稱
外國學位研究所名稱
學年度 103
學期 2
出版年 104
研究生(中文) 許博茹
研究生(英文) Po-Lu Hsu
學號 602600099
學位類別 碩士
語言別 繁體中文
第二語言別
口試日期 2015-06-06
論文頁數 56頁
口試委員 指導教授 - 郭樂平(lopinkuo@mail.tku.edu.tw)
委員 - 張寶光(baog@mail.tku.edu.tw)
委員 - 李光廷(Kitty.kyty@gmail.com)
關鍵字(中) 碳管理系統
生態效益
企業價值
氣候變遷
中小企業
關鍵字(英) Carbon management systems
eco-efficiency
firm value
climate change
SMEs
第三語言關鍵字
學科別分類
中文摘要
本研究探討企業建立碳管理系統機制,能否為企業帶來更好的生態效益,並提升企業價值。以日經500及S&P Japan中小型指數成分股為研究樣本,採用縱橫資料模型(Panel data model)進行迴歸分析。實證結果發現,揭露更多的碳管理系統資訊,有助於正向調節生態效益與企業價值的關係,再者,中小企業相較於大型企業得到更多投資者關注,對企業價值的提升有正向顯著影響,此外,非敏感產業的碳管理系統資訊揭露越透明,顯著增加企業價值;敏感產業則否。基此,對日本投資者而言,或許環境保護是大企業及敏感產業應該承擔的責任,反之,中小企業和非敏感產業若揭露更多的碳管理訊息,將帶來降排的綠色聲譽及企業價值。
再結合規模與產業特性因素後,實證結果發現,中小規模非敏感企業揭露其碳管理訊息,有助於正向調節生態效益與企業價值的關係,或許是因為中小規模非敏感企業揭露資訊的程度超出投資者的預期,然而,大規模敏感企業所釋放之碳管理資訊,似乎無法讓投資者信任,故對其生態效益與價值間的關係沒有產生正向調節的效果,再者,大規模非敏感企業之碳管理資訊揭露,似乎已讓投資者信任,對其生態效益與價值間的關係有正向調節的效果,但未達統計上的顯著性,這項結果或許暗示大規模非敏感企業之碳管理資訊揭露對投資人而言,仍有期待與進步的空間。
本研究結果可供各企業思考,在氣候變遷對於經濟活動衝擊愈來愈大的背景之下,企業應盡其所能揭露其氣候變遷風險以及所因應之措施,以降低投資者對其投資標的所擔憂之未來風險;尤其,中小型企業之經理人更應該思考,因應氣候變遷或許是好的管理策略,藉由前瞻性的碳管理系統及揭露,能吸引資本市場的綠色投資人,有助於企業的聲譽及價值創造。
英文摘要
This study explores whether enterprises establish mechanism of carbon management system could have better eco-efficiency and enhance the firm value or not. The sample comprises Japanese firms from listed in the Nikkei 500 and S & P Japan SME’s companies using regression analysis of panel data model. Empirical results show that, more disclosure of carbon management system for firms will positively mediate the relation between eco-efficiency and firm value. Furthermore, SMEs compared to large enterprises get more attention from investors, there is a significant and positive impact on their firm value, and the companies on non-sensitive industries disclosing more information of carbon management system will significantly positive impact on their firm value, but the companies on sensitive industries won’t. Based on above statement, firms of large size and environmentally-sensitive industries imply to take responsibility for environmental protection. In contrast, the firms belong to SMEs and non-sensitive industries could bring the green reputation and value when firms are willing to disclose more information of carbon management. 
Combined size and characteristics of the industry factors, empirical results show that small and medium size companies of non-sensitive industry disclose more information about carbon management system for firms will positively mediate the relation between eco-efficiency and firm value. This result indicates that the degree of the companies to expose information perhaps beyond the expectations of investors. However, large size company of sensitive industry release the information of carbon management not seem to get the trust of investors, so won’t positively mediate the relation between eco-efficiency and firm value. Furthermore, large size company of non-sensitive industry release the information of carbon management seem to get the trust of investors, it might positively mediate the relation between eco-efficiency and firm value but not reached statistical significance. This result may imply for investors that large size company of non-sensitive industry release the information of carbon management are still have room for improvement.
The results of this study can provide the companies to think, under the impact of climate change on economic activity increasingly context, companies should do its utmost to disclose its climate change risks and the measures in response to reduce the risk of future which investors are worried about. Especially, SMEs’ managers should think that it is a good management strategy to attract green investors with proactive attitude to response climate change and control carbon management. It is also able to enhance firms’ reputation and value.
第三語言摘要
論文目次
目錄
目錄 IV
表目錄 VI
圖目錄 VII
第壹章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景 1
第二節 研究動機 3
第三節 研究目的 4
第四節 研究架構與流程 5
第貳章 文獻探討及建立研究假說 7
第一節 碳管理系統(CMS) 9
第二節 生態效益(ECO-EFFICIENCY) 14
第三節 生態效益與企業價值的關係 18
第四節 碳管理系統與企業價值的關係 20
第五節 碳管理系統與生態效益及企業價值的關係 22
第參章 研究方法 24
第一節 觀念性架構 24
第二節 變數衡量與實證模型 25
第三節 樣本及資料來源 31
第四節 資料分析方法 33
第肆章 實證結果分析 34
第一節 敘述性統計分析 34
第二節 相關性分析	 34
第三節 實證結果分析 37
第伍章 結論與建議 43
參考文獻 45

表目錄
表2-1 日本碳排放交易制度彙總表 9
表3-1 碳管理系統基本要素與評分標準之彙總 27
表3-2 各變數之定義 31
表4-1 敘述統計 35
表4-2 樣本之CMS揭露分數表 35
表4-3 各變數間之PEARSON相關係數矩陣與變異膨脹係數(VIF) 36
表4-4 碳管理系統、生態效益與企業價值之關係 38
表4-5 全部樣本之CO2排放量、生態效益(EE)分析表 39
表4-6 大規模與中小規模樣本之CO2排放量、生態效益(EE)分析表 39
表4-7 敏感產業與非敏感產業樣本之之CO2排放量、生態效益(EE)分析表40
表4-8 碳管理系統、生態效益與企業價值之關係-結合規模與產業特性 41
表4-9大規模敏感、大規模非敏感與中小規模非敏感樣本之CO2排放量、生態效益(EE)分析表 42

圖目錄
圖1-1 研究流程圖 6
圖2-1 全球溫室效應對策稅 8
圖2-2 碳管理系統構面的相互影響 11
圖3-1 觀念性架構圖 24
參考文獻
參考文獻

中文文獻
王翠萍與林忠,2013,低碳會計信息披露淺議,中國農墾,第1期:75-76。
吳易樺,2013,日本碳稅制度介紹,工業技術研究院,綠能與環境研究所。 
安侯建業聯合會計師事務所(KPMG),2014,透過國際評比,觀察永續風向並強化企業體質,Available from:
https://www.kpmg.com/TW/zh/Documents/ccs/ccs-enews-201404.html.
行政院環境保護署,2014,日本溫室氣體減量管理作法,國家溫室氣體減量法規資訊網,Available from:http://estc10.estc.tw/ghgrule/Foreign/foreign_2_2.asp. 
植田和弘,2014,日本的碳稅與可再生能源價格政策,中國低碳經濟發展報告,pp.205。

英文文獻
Beets, S. D., & Souther, C. C. 1999. Corporate environmental reports: The need for standards and an environmental assurance service. Accounting Horizons 13 (2): 129-145. 
Bradford, J., & Fraser, E. D. 2008. Local authorities, climate change and small and medium enterprises: identifying effective policy instruments to reduce energy use and carbon emissions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 15 (3): 156-172.
Brammer, S., & Pavelin, S. 2006. Voluntary environmental disclosures by large UK companies. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 33 (7,8): 1168-1188. 
Brinkman, M. W., Hoffman, N., & Oppenheim, J. M. 2008. How climate change could affect corporate valuations. McKinsey Quarterly 29: 1-7.
Brown, P. J., Fuller, D., & Harun, R. M. 2011. The association between greenhouse gas management and operating performance: Australian evidence. Paper presented at the UTS Business School Seminar. Vol. 21. 
Browne, P. J. 2012. Carbon accounting why and how? Accountancy Ireland 44 (2): 18-19. 
Burnett, R. D., & Hansen, D. R. 2008. Ecoefficiency: Defining a role for environmental cost management. Accounting, Organizations and Society 33 (6): 551-581. 
Busch, T., & Hoffmann, V. H. 2007. Emerging carbon constraints for corporate risk management. Ecological Economics 62 (3): 518-528. 
Busch, T., & Hoffmann, V. H. 2011. How hot is your bottom line? linking carbon and financial performance. Business & Society 50 (2): 233-265. 
Carroll, A. B. 1979. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review 4 (4): 497-505. 
Carroll, A. B. 1991. The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons 34 (4): 39-48. 
Chapple, L., Clarkson, P. M., & Gold, D. L. 2013. The cost of carbon: Capital market effects of the proposed emission trading scheme (ETS). Abacus 49 (1): 1-33. 
Cho, C. H., & Patten, D. M. 2007. The role of environmental disclosures as tools of legitimacy: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society 32 (7): 639-647. 
Chung, K. H., & Pruitt, S. W. 1994. A simple approximation of tobin's q. Financial Management: 70-74. 
Cohen, M. A., Fenn, S., & Naimon, J. S. 1995. Environmental and financial performance: are they related? Investor Responsibility Research Center, Environmental Information Service.
Cole, R. E. 1991. Strategies for learning: small-group activities in American, Japanese, and Swedish industry. Univ of California Press.
Cong, Y., & Freedman, M. 2011. Corporate governance and environmental performance and disclosures. Advances in Accounting 27 (2): 223-232. 
Cordeiro, J. J., & Sarkis, J. 1997. Environmental proactivism and firm performance: Evidence from security analyst earnings forecasts. Business Strategy and the Environment 6 (2): 104-114. 
Darnall, N., & Edwards, D. 2006. Predicting the cost of environmental management system adoption: The role of capabilities, resources and ownership structure. Strategic Management Journal 27 (4): 301-320. 
Deegan, C. 2002. Introduction: The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures–a theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 15 (3): 282-311. 
Derwall, J., Guenster, N., Bauer, R., & Koedijk, K. 2005. The eco-efficiency premium puzzle. Financial Analysts Journa l 61 (2): 51-63. 
Dess, G. G., & Beard, D. W. 1984. Dimensions of organizational task environments. Administrative Science Quarterly: 52-73. 
Elsayed, K., & Paton, D. 2005. The impact of environmental performance on firm performance: Static and dynamic panel data evidence. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 16 (3): 395-412. 
Epstein, M. J. and Leonard, H. B. 2014. Making sustainability work: Best practices in managing and measuring corporate social, environmental and economic impacts. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Etzion, D. 2007. Research on organizations and the natural environment, 1992-present: A review. Journal of Management 33 (4): 637-664. 
Fauzi, H. 2009. Corporate Social and Financial Performance : Empirical Evidence from American Companies. Globsyn Management Journal, Forthcoming.
Filbeck, G., & Gorman, R. F. 2004. The relationship between the environmental and financial performance of public utilities. Environmental and Resource Economics 29 (2): 137-157. 
Fombrun, C. J., Gardberg, N. A., & Barnett, M. L. 2000. Opportunity platforms and safety nets: Corporate citizenship and reputational risk. Business and Society Review 105 (1): 85-106. 
FRC. 2012. The UK corporate governance code. London: Financial Reporting Council.
Friedman, M. 2009. Capitalism and freedom. University of Chicago press.
García-Sánchez, I., & Prado-Lorenzo, J. 2012. Greenhouse gas emission practices and financial performance. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management 4 (3): 260-276. 
Gregg, D. 2009. Carbon footprints gain ground as governance issue. Puget Sound Business Journal. 
GS Sustain. 2009. Change is Coming: A Framework for Climate Change—A Defining Issue of the 21st Century. New York, NY: The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
Guenster, N., Bauer, R., Derwall, J., & Koedijk, K. 2011. The economic value of corporate Eco‐Efficiency. European Financial Management 17 (4): 679-704. 
Hart, S. L. 1995. A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review 20 (4): 986-1014. 
Hausman, J. A. 1978. Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society: 1251-1271. 
Henriques, I. and Sadorsky, P. 1996. The determinants of an environmentally responsive firm: an empirical approach. Journal of environmental economics and management, 30 (3), 381-395.
Hirsch, B. T. 1991. Union coverage and profitability among US firms. The Review of Economics and Statistics: 69-77. 
Hoffman, A. J. 2007. Carbon strategies: How leading companies are reducing their climate change footprint. University of Michigan Press. 
Holmes, S.L. 1977. Corporate social performances: Past and present areas of commitment. Academy of Management Journal 20 (3): 433-438.
IPCC, 2007, IPCC Fourth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2007, Retrieved from: http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg3/en/annex1-ensglossary-a-d.html. 
Jenkins, H. 2004. A critique of conventional CSR theory: an SME perspective. Journal of General Management 29: 37-57.
Jenkins, H. 2009. A business opportunity model of corporate social responsibility for small‐and medium‐sized enterprises. Business Ethics: A European Review 18 (1): 21-36.
Jingshan, C., & Ying, Q. 2007. Empirical Research on Drive Mechanism of Firms' Environmental Management. Ecological Economy 3 (1): 40-50. 
Klassen, R. D., & McLaughlin, C. P. 1996. The impact of environmental management on firm performance. Management Science 42 (8): 1199-1214. 
Klassen, R. D., & Whybark, D. C. 1999. The impact of environmental technologies on manufacturing performance. Academy of Management Journal 42 (6): 599-615. 
Kolk, A., Levy, D., & Pinkse, J. 2008. Corporate responses in an emerging climate regime: The institutionalization and commensuration of carbon disclosure. European Accounting Review 17 (4): 719-745. 
Konar, S., & Cohen, M. A. 2001. Does the market value environmental performance? Review of Economics and Statistics 83 (2): 281-289. 
Lash, J., & Wellington, F. 2007. Competitive advantage on a warming planet. Harvard business review 85 (3): 94-102.
Lawler, E. E. 1986. High Involvement Management. Participative Strategies for Improving Organizational Performance. San Francisco: Iossey—Bass.
Lee, S., Pollitt, H., & Ueta, K. 2012. An assessment of Japanese carbon tax reform using the E3MG econometric model. The Scientific World Journal, 2012. Available from: http://www.hindawi.com/journals/tswj/2012/835917/
Liao, L., Luo, L., & Tang, Q. 2014. Gender diversity, board independence, environmental committee and greenhouse gas disclosure. The British Accounting Review, In Press, 1-16.
Luo, L., Lan, Y., & Tang, Q. 2012. Corporate incentives to disclose carbon information: Evidence from the CDP global 500 report. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting 23 (2): 93-120. 
Luo, L., Tang, Q., & Lan, Y. 2013. Comparison of propensity for carbon disclosure between developing and developed countries: A resource constraint perspective. Accounting Research Journal 26 (1): 6-34. 
Matsumura, E. M., Prakash, R., & Vera-Muñoz, S. C. 2011. Voluntary disclosures and the firm-value effects of carbon emissions. University of Wisconsin-Madison, Georgetown University, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, Working Paper. 
Matsumura, E. M., Prakash, R., & Vera-Muñoz, S. C. 2014. Firm-value effects of carbon emissions and carbon disclosures. The Accounting Review 89 (2): 695-724. 
Melnyk, S. A., Sroufe, R. P., & Calantone, R. 2003. Assessing the impact of environmental management systems on corporate and environmental performance. Journal of Operations Management 21 (3): 329-351. 
Michals, G. 2009. The boardroom’s climate is changing: More companies are designating specific committees for environmental issues to help inform the board of potential problems. Directorship Boardroom Intelligence. 
Michelon, G., & Parbonetti, A. 2012. The effect of corporate governance on sustainability disclosure. Journal of Management & Governance 16 (3): 477-509. 
Michelsen, O., Fet, A. M., & Dahlsrud, A. 2006. Eco-efficiency in extended supply chains: A case study of furniture production. Journal of Environmental Management 79 (3): 290-297. 
Miles, M. P., Munilla, L. S., & Covin, J. G. 2002. The constant gardener revisited: The effect ofSocial blackmail on the marketing concept, innovation, and entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics 41 (3): 287-295. 
Mishra, S., and D. Suar. 2010. Does corporate social responsibility influence firm performance of Indian companies? Journal of Business Ethics 95 (4): 571-601.
Molina-Azorín, J. F., Claver-Cortés, E., López-Gamero, M. D., & Tarí, J. J. 2009. Green management and financial performance: A literature review. Management Decision 47 (7): 1080-1100. 
Murillo, D. and Lozano, J. M. 2009. Pushing forward SME CSR through a network: an account from the Catalan model, Business Ethics: A European Review 18 (1): 7-20.
Nakao, Y., Amano, A., Matsumura, K., Genba, K., & Nakano, M. 2007. Relationship between environmental performance and financial performance: An empirical analysis of japanese corporations. Business Strategy and the Environment 16 (2): 106-118. 
Nehrt, C. 1998. Maintainability of first mover advantages when environmental regulations differ between countries. Academy of Management Review 23 (1): 77-97. 
Neu, D., Warsame, H., & Pedwell, K. 1998. Managing public impressions: Environmental disclosures in annual reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society 23 (3): 265-282. 
Newell, R. G. 2010. The role of markets and policies in delivering innovation for climate change mitigation. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 26 (2): 253-269. 
Nishitani, K., & Kokubu, K. 2012. Why does the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions enhance firm value? the case of japanese manufacturing firms. Business Strategy and the Environment 21 (8): 517-529. 
O'Dwyer, B., Unerman, J., & Hession, E. 2005. User needs in sustainability reporting: Perspectives of stakeholders in ireland. European Accounting Review 14 (4): 759-787. 
Okereke, C. 2007. An exploration of motivations, drivers and barriers to carbon management: The UK FTSE 100. European Management Journal 25 (6): 475-486. 
Oliver, C. 1997. The influence of institutional and task environment relationships on organizational performance: The canadian construction industry. Journal of Management Studies 34 (1): 99-124. 
Orsato, R. J. 2006. When does it pay to be green? California Management Review 48 (2): 128. 
Pershing, J., & Tudela, F. 2003. A long-term target. Beyond Kyoto Advancing the International Effort Against Climate Change. 
Peters, G., & Romi, A. 2009. Carbon disclosure incentives in a global setting: An empirical investigation. University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, Working Paper. 
Peters, G., & Romi, A. 2011. The Effect of Corporate Governance on Voluntary Risk Disclosures: Evidence from Greenhouse Gas Emission Reporting. Working Paper, University of Arkansas.
Pinkse, J., & Kolk, A. 2009. International business and global climate change. Routledge. 
Pinkse, J., & Kolk, A. 2010. Challenges and trade‐offs in corporate innovation for climate change. Business Strategy and the Environment 19 (4): 261-272. 
Porter, M. E. 1980. Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York, NY: Free Press.
Porter, M. E., & Van der Linde, C. 1995a. Green and competitive: ending the stalemate. Harvard business review 73 (5): 120-134. 
Porter, M. E., & Van der Linde, C. 1995b. Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 9 (4): 97-118. 
PwC 2008, Carbon value: Robust carbon management – a framework to protect and enhance shareholder value in response to climate change, PricewaterhouseCoopers Australia, available at: http://download.pwc.com/ie/pubs/robust_carbon_management.pdf, accessed 14 March 2012.
Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. 1997. A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal 40 (3): 534-559. 
Shrivastava, P. 1995a. Environmental technologies and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal 16 (S1): 183-200. 
Shrivastava, P. 1995b. The role of corporations in achieving ecological sustainability. Academy of Management Review 20 (4): 936-960. 
SROUFE, R. 2003. Effects of environmental management systems on environmental management practices and operations. Production and Operations Management 12 (3): 416-431. 
Stanny, E. 2010. Voluntary disclosures by US firms to the carbon disclosure project. School of Business and Economics, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park, CA, Working Paper. 
Stanny, E., & Ely, K. 2008. Corporate environmental disclosures about the effects of climate change. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 15 (6): 338-348. 
Stern, N. 2008. The economics of climate change. The American Economic Review 98 (2): 1-37. 
Tang, Q., & Luo, L. 2011. Transparency of corporate carbon disclosure: International evidence. SSRN Working Paper Series. 
Tang, Q., & Luo, L. 2014. Carbon management systems and carbon mitigation. Australian Accounting Review 24 (1): 84-98. 
Vogel, D. 2006. The market for virtue: The potential and limits of corporate social responsibility, Brookings Institution Press. 
Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. 1997. The corporate social performance. Strategic Management Journal 8 (4): 303-319. 
Wagner, M. 2005. How to reconcile environmental and economic performance to improve corporate sustainability: Corporate environmental strategies in the european paper industry. Journal of Environmental Management 76 (2): 105-118.
論文全文使用權限
校內
校內紙本論文立即公開
同意電子論文全文授權校園內公開
校內電子論文於授權書繳交後5年公開
校外
同意授權
校外電子論文於授權書繳交後5年公開

如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信