系統識別號 | U0002-1806201509381400 |
---|---|
DOI | 10.6846/TKU.2015.00504 |
論文名稱(中文) | 負債融資成本的影響因素─董事會成員背景及環境資訊透明度的觀點 |
論文名稱(英文) | Affected factors of the cost of debt─from the perspective of board members’ background and transparency of environmental information |
第三語言論文名稱 | |
校院名稱 | 淡江大學 |
系所名稱(中文) | 會計學系碩士班 |
系所名稱(英文) | Department of Accounting |
外國學位學校名稱 | |
外國學位學院名稱 | |
外國學位研究所名稱 | |
學年度 | 103 |
學期 | 2 |
出版年 | 104 |
研究生(中文) | 陳泳年 |
研究生(英文) | Yung-Nien Chen |
學號 | 602600057 |
學位類別 | 碩士 |
語言別 | 繁體中文 |
第二語言別 | |
口試日期 | 2015-06-06 |
論文頁數 | 83頁 |
口試委員 |
指導教授
-
郭樂平
委員 - 張寶光 委員 - 李光廷 |
關鍵字(中) |
董事會成員背景 環境資訊透明度 負債資金成本 兩階段最小平方法 政商關係 |
關鍵字(英) |
Board members’ Background Transparency of environmental information Debt of financing costs Two-stage least squares method Government-business relations |
第三語言關鍵字 | |
學科別分類 | |
中文摘要 |
本研究探討私有企業在中國,除財務資訊外,非財務資訊(例如:董事會成員背景及企業環境資訊透明度)是否會影響其負債融資成本。研究期間為2008至2011年,以中國深圳及上海證券交易所中有發布企業社會責任(CSR)報告書的上市A股私有企業為樣本,採行兩階段最小平方法進行迴歸分析。研究結果顯示,在中國,規模較大的公司、環境衝擊較高的公司以及政府持股較高的企業,會揭露較多的環境資訊;然而,企業獨立董事的比例越高、董事教育專業度越高、環境資訊揭露水準越高其負債資金成本率不會降低,但是,董事成員若具備良好的政商關係時,會降低企業負債資金成本率但未達顯著,再者,企業前期的營收成長、還款能力佳與規模較大時,顯著降低其負債融資成本。中國的十一五、十二五政策積極鼓勵企業朝向低污染經濟發展,而銀行是否落實綠色信貸給予差別化融資?以往研究較少探討企業決策群的背景及獨立性,甚至環境資訊透明度等非財務訊息對企業融資負債的影響,本研究實證結果的貢獻-中國已發布CSR報告書的私有企業提供增額非財務資訊時,並無法有效為企業取得較低的負債融資成本。中國的私有企業提供非財務資訊為何對其負債融資不具決策有用性值得後續關注探討。 |
英文摘要 |
This study investigated the private sectors in China, in addition to financial information and the non-financial information (for example: a board member and corporate environmental information transparency background), which will affect the debt financing costs. During the study period of year 2008 to 2011, Shenzhen and Shanghai Stock Exchange in China have issued corporate social responsibility (CSR) report listed A shares of private companies as a sample, which are adopted bytwo-stage least squares regression analysis method. The results show that in China, the larger the company, the higher the environmental impact of the company, as well as higher government ownership of business. These would reveal more environmental information. However, the higher the proportion of independent directors of the enterprise and the director with professional education degree, the higher the level of environmental information, which will expose the higher debt ratio. This will not reduce the cost of capital. If the board members have good political and business relations, it will reduce the cost of capital rate debt, but it is not significant. Moreover, revenue growth and good ability of solvency will significantly reduce the company’s debt financing costs. The policy of China's “11th five” encourages enterprises towards economic development, and the bank executes the implementation of “green credit”. The past few studies investigated the background of corporate decision-making group and independence, even they affect the environment, transparency of information, and other non-financial information on corporate debt financing. The contribution of this study is published in the China CSR Report---the amount of private non-financial enterprises information cannot effectively lower the cost of debt financing for businesses, with non-financial information. It’s worthy to follow up and discuss the usefulness of decision for corporate debt financing decision. |
第三語言摘要 | |
論文目次 |
目錄 第壹章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 5 第三節 研究架構及流程 7 第貳章 文獻探討 9 第一節 文獻觀念性架構介紹 9 第二節 銀行借款利率與負債資金成本 12 第三節 企業在中國的融資情形 14 第四節 中國的環境管理制度與中國的政策 16 第五節 董事會成員的背景、環境資訊揭露與融資 18 第六節 中國的綠色信貸 29 第參章 研究方法 33 第一節 觀念性架構及研究假說 33 第二節 實證模型與變數衡量 36 第三節 研究樣本與資料蒐集 46 第四節 研究方法 48 第肆章 實證結果 49 第一節 敘述性統計 49 第二節 相關分析 51 第三節 迴歸分析結果 53 第伍章 結論與建議 61 第一節 研究結論 61 第二節 管理意涵及研究貢獻 64 第三節 研究限制與建議 66 參考文獻 圖目錄 圖 1 1研究流程圖 8 圖 2 1文獻探討觀念性架構 11 圖 2 2企業資金來源架構圖 12 圖 2 3治理機制與負債資金成本之關係架構圖 13 圖 3 1實證變數觀念性架構 35 表目錄 表 3 1模型中變數之定義 37 表 3 2中國企業社會責任榜專家評價體系評比表 43 表 3 3研究樣本之選擇 47 表4-1 敘述性統計 50 表4-2 Pearson相關性分析 52 表4-3 影響EID總體的迴歸結果- MODEL 1 53 表4-4 總體EID影響融資的迴歸結果- MODEL 2 54 表4-5 影響實質性EID的迴歸結果- MODEL 3 57 表4-6 實質性EID影響融資的迴歸結果- MODEL 4 57 表4-7 影響象徵性EID的迴歸結果- MODEL 5 59 表4-8 象徵性EID影響融資的迴歸結果- MODEL 6 59 |
參考文獻 |
參考文獻 中文文獻 于小剛主編,2010,中國銀行業環境記錄,雲南科技出版社,頁1。 王玉榮,2005,我國上市公司融資結構決定因素的實證分析,工業技術經濟。 王帥,2011,國內商業銀行綠色信貸分析,中國市場,第二十六期:64-66。 伍宇文,2007,財務管理─理論與應用,台北市。 吳文鋒、吳沖鋒與劉曉薇,2008,中國民營上市公司高管政府背景與公司價值,經濟研究:130一141。 吴文峰、吴冲锋與芮萌,2009,中國上市公司高管的政府背景與税收優惠。 李東衛,2011,銀行業推行綠色信貸的困境與對策,環境經濟,第五期:48-51。 李維安、武力東,2002,公司治理教程,上海人民出版社。 杜興強、周澤將, 2009,政治聯繫層級與中國民營上市公司真實業績政治聯繫層級與中國民營上市公司真實業績,經濟與管理研究,37-49。 肖作平、廖理,2008,公司治理影響債務期限水平嗎—來自中國上市公司的經驗證據,管理世界。 姜躍龍,2008,具有政府背景的高管繼任影響公司價值嗎?─托賓Q值視角下的解讀,中山大學研究生學刊:82-89。 胡乃武、曹大偉,2011,綠色信貸與商業銀行環境風險管理,經濟問題,第三期:203-107。 胡蘇,2011,制度環境、獨立董事與長期借款融資─來自中國上市公司的經驗證據,山西財經大學學報。 夏少敏,2008,論綠色信貸政策的法律化,法學雜誌,頁56。 秦穎,2006,企業環境管理的驅動力研究,大連:大連理工大學博士學位論文。 國際能源機構(IEA),2013,各國碳排放數據集。 婁志捷,2010,鞏固推進綠色信貸-基於商業銀行長期發展角度的思考,經濟論談,第七期:120。 崔士鑫,2007,黨委書記權力究竟有多大?引用自人民網http://politics.people.com.cn/GB/30178/5316277.html/。 張曾蓮,2010,公司治理對銀行借款成本影響的實證分析,中國現代管理,53-61。 郭敏華,1996,資訊不對稱對負債資金成本之影響─以銀行借款為實證,國立政治大學企業管理研究所博士論文。 陳浩,2006,環境管制與企業競爭力的演化經濟學解釋—對傳統觀點和修正學派的批判,生態經歷,38-41。 陳俊佑,2008,台灣上市公司借款之資金成本,貨幣觀測與信用評等,第74期:45-54。 陳柳欽,2010,國內外綠色信貸的實踐路徑,環境經濟,第十二期:26-28。 黃彩婷,2011,公司治理機制與負債資金成本之關係,靜宜大學會計學系碩士論文。 黃德舜,1993,負債契約與代理問題之研究,政治大學企業管理研究所博士論文。 劉志雲等著,2011,商業銀行社會責任的法律問題研究,廈門大學出版社,頁357。 劉威廷,2005,獨立董事及監察人之設置與債務資金成本關聯性之研究,國立政治大學會計學系碩士班碩士論文。 潘克勤,2010,獨立董事比例、產權性質與長期債務融資契約,經濟經緯。 潘紅波、余明桂,2008,政治關聯、投資者法律保護與控股股東掠奪,成都:中國第七屆實證會計國際研討會,交通大學,西南。 蔣殿春,2003,中國上市公司資本結構與融資傾向,世界經濟,46-48。 羅黨論、黃向與聶超穎,2010,產權、政治關係與房地企業融資,財貿研究,113-119。 胡憲倫,2011,企業永續報告之發展趨勢簡報,台灣永續報告,台灣永續能源研究基金會,台北。 英文文獻 Adams, C. A. and Larrinaga-Gonza’lez, C. 2007. Engaging with organizations in pursuit of improved sustainability accounting and performance, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 20(3), 333-355. Adams, C. A. and McNicholas, P. 2007. Making a difference: sustainability reporting, accountability and organizational change, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 20(3), 382–402. Adams, C. A., 2002. Internal organizational factors influencing corporate social and ethical reporting: Beyond current theorising. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 15(2), 223–250. Aerts, W., Cormier, D. and Magnan, M. 2008. Corporate environmental disclosure, financial markets and the media: An international perspective. Ecological Economics, 64(3), 643–659. Al-Tuwaijri, S., Christensen, T. E., Hughes II, K. E., 2004. The Relations among Environmental Disclosure, Environmental Performance, and Economic Performance: A Simultaneous Equations Approach. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29, 447-471. Amalric,F. 2005. The Equator Principles: a step towards sustainability? Working Paper Series, Center for Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability (CCRS),University of Zurich, Zurich,1-23. Anderson, R. C., Mansi S. A., and Reeb D. M. 2004. Board characteristics accounting report integrity and the cost of debt, Journal of Accounting and Economics ,37, 315-342. Anup, A. and Knoeber, C.R. 2001. Do Some Outside Directors Play a Political Role? Journal of Law and Economics , 44 (1) , 179-198. Barnea, A., Haugen, R. and Senbet, L. 1985.Agency Problems and Financial Contracting. In Foundations of Finance Series, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, Prentice Hall. Barney, J.B. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. Beckman, C. M. and Haunschild P. R.. 2002. Network Learning: The Effects of Partners’ Heterogeneity of Experience on Corporate Acquisitions, Administrative Science Quarterly , 47, 92–124. Beekes, W., Pope, P., and Young, S. 2004. The link between earnings timeliness, earnings conservatism and board composition: Evidence from the UK. Corporate Governance: An International Review,12(1), 47–59. Berman, S. L., Wicks, A. C., Kotha, S. and Jones, T. M. 1999. Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 488-506. Berthelot, S., Cormier D., and Magnan M. 2003. Environmental disclosure research: Review and synthesis. Journal of Accounting Literature, 22, 1-44. Bewley, K. and Li, Y. 2000. Disclosure of environmental information by Canadian manufacturing companies: a voluntary disclosure perspective, Advances in Environmental Accounting and Management, 1, 206-226. Bilimoria, D. 2000. Building the business case for women corporate directors. In: R.J. Burke and M.C. Mattis, eds. Women on corporate boards of directors: international challenges and opportunities. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 25-40. Boddewyn, J. J. 2003. Understanding and advancing the concept of nonmarket usiness and society, 42, 297-327. Boeker W. 1989. Strategic change: the effects of founding and history. Academy of Management Journal, 32(3), 489–515. Boesso, G. and Kumar, K. 2007. Drivers of corporate voluntary disclosure: a framework and empirical evidence from Italy and the United States, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 20 (2), 269-296. Boubakri, N., Cosset, J. and Saffar, W. 2008. Political connections of newly privatized firms. Journal of Corporate Finance,14(5), 654-673. Bowman, E. H. and Haire, M. 1975. A strategic posture towards corporate social responsibility. California Management Review, 18(2), 49–58. Brammer, S. and Millington, A. 2005. Corporate reputation and philanthropy: An empirical analysis, Journal of Business Ethics,61, 29-44. Brammer, S. and Pavelin, S. 2008. Factors influencing the quality of corporate environmental disclosure, Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(2), 120–136. Brown, S. and Hillegeist, S. A. 2006. How disclosure quality affects the long-run level of information asymmetry. INSEAD Working Paper. Retrieved from SSRN http://ssrn.com/abstract=297371. Campbell, D. 2000. Legitimacy theory or managerial reality construction? corporate social disclosure in Marks and Spencer Plc corporate reports, 1969–1997, 24(1), 80–100. Cannella, A.A. and Holcomb, T.R. 2005. A multi-level analysis of the upper-echelons model. In Research in Multilevel Issues: The Many Faces of Multi-level Issues . Chan, V. P.K. 1999. Cross-Country Sweep to Clean up Judiciary. South China Morning Post. Chaney, P., Paccio, M., Parsley, D. 2010. The Quality of Accounting Information in Politically Connected Firms, Journal of Accounting and Economics, forthcoming. Chiang, H. T. and He, L. J., 2010. Board Supervision Capability and Information Transparency, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(1), 18–31. Chih, H. L., Shen, C.H., Kang, F.C. 2008. Corporate social responsibility, investor protection, and earnings management: some international evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, 79, 179-198. Child, J. and Tse, D. K. 2001. China’s transition and its implications for international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(1), 5-22. Chutathong, C., Raja, K. and Yupana, W. 2006. Crony Lending Thailand before the Financial Crisis, Journal of Business, 79, 181-218. Claessens, S., Feijen, E. and Laeven, L. 2008. Political Connections and Preferential Access to Finance:the Role of Campaign Contributions, Journal of Financial Economics88, 554-580. Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D. and Vasvari, F. P. 2008. Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4–5), 303–327. Coffey, B. and Fryxell, G. E. 1991. Institutional Ownership of Stock and Dimensions of Corporate Social Performance: An Empirical Examination, Journal of Business Ethics, 10, 437-444. Coleman, J. S. 1993. The Relational Reconstruction of Society. American Sociological Review, 58, 1–15. Cooper, M., Gulen H. and Ovtchinnikov A. 2010. Corporate Political Contributions and Stock Returns, Journal of Finance. Cormier, D. and Gordon, I. M., 2001. An examination of social and environmental reporting strategies, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 14(5), 587-616. Cowen, S. S., Ferreri, L. B. and Parker, L. D. 1987. The impact of corporate characteristics on social responsibility disclosure: A typology and frequency based analysis. Journal of Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(2), 111-122. Criado, Jimenez. I., Fernandez-C. M., Larrinage-G. C. and Husillos-C. F. J. 2008. Compliance with mandatory environmental reporting in financial statements: The case of Spain, Journal of Business Ethics, 79(3), 245–262. Dechow, P. M., Sloan R.G. and Sweeney A. P. 1996. Cause and consequence of earnings manipulation: an analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC, Contemporary Accounting Research, 13(1), 1-36. Deegan, C. and Gordon, B. 1996. A study of the environment disclosure practices of Australian corporations. Journal of accounting and business research, 26(3), 187-199. Deng, X., Tan, Z. and Abrar, M. 2010. The corporate political strategy and its integration with market strategy in transitional China. Journal of Public Affairs, 10, 373–382. Diamond, D. 1991. Monitoring and Reputation: the choice between bank loans and directly place debt, Journal of Political Economy, 99, 689-721. Dine, S. 2005. Politicians and banks: Political influences on government-owned banks in emerging countries. Journal of Financial Economics, 77, 453-479. Evans, M. F., Gilpatric, S. M. and Liu, L. R., 2009. Regulation with direct benefits of information disclosure and imperfect monitoring, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 57(3), 284–292. Faccio, M. and McCorInel, C. 2006. Political connections and corporate bailouts , Journal of Finance, 2597-2635. Fallan, E. and Fallan, L. 2009. Voluntarism versus regulation lessons from public disclosure of environmental performance information in Norwegian companies, Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change, 5(4), 472–489. Fama, E. F. and Jensen, M. C. 1983. Separation of ownership and control, Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 301-25. Fan, P.H., Wong, T.J. and Zhang, T. 2007. Politically-connected CEOs, Corporate Governance and Post-IPO Performance of China's Newly Partially Privatized Firms, Journal of Financial Economics, 84, 330-357. Fauzi, H.. 2010. “Corporate social and financial performance: Empirical evidence from American companies”, Working paper, Sebelas Maret University. Francis, J., Khurana, I. and Pereira, R. 2005. Disclosure Incentives and Effects on Cost of Capital around the World. The Accounting Review ,80(4), 1125-1162. Freedman, M. and Jaggi, B. 1982. Pollution disclosures, pollution performance and economic performance, Omega, 10(2), 167–176. Goldman, E., Rocholl J. and So J. 2009. Do politically connected boards affect firm value, Review of Financial Studies , 22, 2331-2360. Gottesman, A. A. and Morey, M. R. 2005. Does a better education make for better managers? An empirical examination of CEO educational quality and firm performance. Graham, J. R. 1995. Corporate Giving: Is It Good For Business? U.S.A. Today Magazine 123, 60–61. Granovetter, M.S. 1985. Economic action and social structure:the problem of social embeddedness, American Journal of Sociology, 91. Gray, R., Javad, M., Power, D. M., and Singlair, C. D. 2001. Social and environmental disclosure andcorporate characteristics: A research note and extension. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 28(3), 327–356. Gray, R., Kouhy, R. and Lavers, S. 1995. Corporate social and environmental reporting: a review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 8(2), 47-77. Guo, P. Y. 2005. Corporate Environmental Reporting and Disclosure in China, http://www.csr-asia.com/upload/environmental reporting.pdf. Hafsi, T. et, Turgut, G., 2012. Boardroom Diversity and its Effect on Social Performance: Conceptualization and Empirical Evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, online first 24 avril. Hambrick, D. C., Werder, A., and Zajac, E. J. 2008. New directions in corporate governance research, Organization Science, 19(3), 381–385. Hermalin, B. E. and Weisbach M. S. 2001. Boards of Directors as an Endogenously Determined Institution : A survey of the Economic Literature, NBER Working Paper , 8161. Hillman, A. J. and Hitt M. A. 1999. Corporate Political Strategy Formulation: A Model of Approach, Participation, and Strategy Decisions. The Academy of Management Review, 24(4), PP.825-842. Hillman, A.J. and Dalziel, T. 2003. Boards of Directors and Firm Performance: Integrating Agency and Resource Dependence Perspectives, Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 383-397. Houston, J. and James, C. 1996. Bank Information Monopolies and the Mix of Private and Public Debt Claims, Journal of Finance, 51, 1863-1889. Huson, M.R., Parrino, R. and Starks, L.T. 2001. Internal Monitoring Mechanisms and CEO Turnover: A Long-Term Perspective, Journal of Finance, (56), 2265-2297. Jayachandran, S. 2006. The Jeffords effect, Journal of Law and Economics ,49, 397-425. Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B. and Neale, M. A. 1999. Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups, Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 741-763. Jensen, M. and Meckling, W. H., 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure, Journal of financial economics, 3(4), 305-360. Karim, K. E., Lacina, M. J. and Rutledge, R. W. 2006. The association between firm characteristics and the level of environmental disclosure in financial statement footnotes, Advances in Environmental Accounting and Management, 3(3), 77–109. Khwaja, A., Mian, A. 2005. Do Lenders Favor Politically Connected Firms?, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120, 1371-1411. King, A. A., Lenox, M. J., and Terlaak, A. 2005, The strategic use of decentralized institutions: Exploring certification with ISO 14001 management standard, Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 1091-1106. Klein, A. 2002. Economic determinants behind variations in audit committee independence. The Accounting Review, 77, 435–452. Kleindorfer, P. R. and Orts, E. W. 1998. Information regulation of environmental risks, Risk Analysis, 18(2), 155–170. Kolk, A. and Pinkse, J., 2010. The Integration of Corporate Governance in Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosures, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17, 15-26. Konar, S. and Cohen, R. A. 2001. Does the market value environmental performance? Review of Economics and Statistics, 83, 281-289. Kor, Y.Y. 2003. Experience-based top management team competence and sustained growth. Organization Science ,14(6), 707–719. Kosnik, R.D. 1987. Greenmail:a study of board performance in corporate governance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 163-185. La, P. et al., Rafael, L. D. S., Florencios S. and Andrei, S. 2000. Govemment ownership of banks, Journal of Finance, 57, 265—301. Laidroo, L. 2009. Association between ownership structure and public announcements disclosures. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(1), 13–34. Lin, N. 2001. Social capital-theory of social structure and action, Cambridge University Press. Lovett, S., Simmons, L. C. and Kali, R. 1999. Guanxi versus the Market: Ethics and efficiency. Journal of International Business Studies ,30(2), 231–248. Lucena, J. and Schneider, J. 2008. Engineers, development, and engineering education: From national to sustainable community development. European Journal of Engineering Education ,33, 247–257. Magness, V. 2006. Strategic posture, financial performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical test of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 19(4), 540–563. Manner M. 2010. The impact of CEO characteristics on corporate social performance, Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 53–72. McGregor, R. 2010. The Party: the secret world of China's communist rulers. Penguin UK. Meyer, J. and Rowan, B., 1977. Institutional organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony, American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340-363. Morhardt, J. E., Baird, S. and Freeman, K., 2002. Scoring corporate environmental and sustainability reports using GRI 2000, ISO 14031 and other criteria, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 9, 215-233. Murrillo-Luna, J. L., Garces-Ayerbe, C., and Rivera-Torres, P., 2008. Why do patterns of environmental response differ? A stakeholder pressure approach, Strategic Management Journal, 29, 1225-1240. Nahapiet, J. and Ghoshal, S. 1998. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266. Navarro, P. 2008. The MBA core curricula of top-ranked U.S. business schools: A study in failure? Academy of Management Learning and Education,7, 108–123. Neu, D., Warsame, H. and Pedwell, K. 1998. Managing public impressions: Environmental disclosures in annual reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23(3), 265–282. North, D. C. 1990. Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Oxford, UK: Cambridge University. Ozen, S. and Kusku, F. 2009. Corporate environmental citizenship variation in developing countries: An institutional framework, Journal of Business Ethics, 89(2), 297–313. Patten, D. 1991. Exposure, legitimacy, and social disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 10(4), 297-308. Patten, D. M. 2002. The relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: a research note, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27(8), 763–773. Porter, M. E. and Kramer, M. R. 2002. The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy, havard business review, 80(12), 57-68. Prencipe, A., 2004. Proprietary costs and determinants of voluntary segment disclosure: Evidence from Italian listed companies, European Accounting Review, 13(2), 319–340. Preston, L. E., 1978. Analyzing corporate social performance: Methods and results, Journal of Contemporary Business, 7(1), 135–149. Ramirez, S. A. 2003. A flaw in the Sarbanes-Oxley reform: Can diversity in the boardroom quell corporate corruption? St. John’s Law Review, 77, 837-866. Reeb, D. M. and Zhao, W. 2010. Director Capital and Corporate Disclosure Quality, Working Paper, http://papers. ssrn.com/sol3/papers. cfm ?abstract_id= 1535577. Robinson, G. and Dechant, K. 1997. Building a business case for diversity, Academy of Management Executive, 11, 21-30. Schuler, D. 1996. Corporate political strategy and foreign competition: The case of the steel industry. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 720-737. Sengupta, P. 1998. Corporate Disclosure Quality and the Cost of the Debt. The Accounting Review, 73, 459-474. Solomon, J. F. and Solomon, A. 2006. Private social, ethical and environmental disclosure. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 19(4), 564–591. Stanwick, S. D., and Stanwick, P. A., 2000. The relationship between environmental disclosures and financial performance: An empirical study of US firms, Eco-Management and Auditing, 7(4), 155–164. Su, C., Sirgy, M. J., and Littlefield, J. E. 2003. Is guanxi orientation bad, ethically speaking? A study of Chinese enterprises. Journal of Business Ethics, 44, 303-312. Suchman, M. C., 1995. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches, Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610. Thomas, D. A. and Ely, R. J. 1996. Making differences matter, Harvard business review, 74(5), 79–90. Tian, Z., Hafsi, T. and Wu, W. 2009. Institutional determinism and political strategies: an empirical investigation. Business and Society, 48, 284–325. Tsang, E. 1998. Can Guanxi Be a Source of Sustained Competitive Advantage for Doing Business in China? Academy of Management Executive, 12(2), 64–73. Ullmann, A. A. 1985. Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance of US firms, Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 540–557. Unerman, J., 2000. Methodological issues. Reflections on quantification in corporate social reporting content analysis, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 13(5), 667-680. Wang, G. W. 2004. The Uses of Dynasty Ideology: Confucianism in Contemporary Business, Asia’s New Crisis –Renewal Through Total Ethical Management. John Wiley and Sons (Asia) Pte Ltd, Singapore. Watchman, P. 2006. Banks, business and human rights, available at: www.equatorprinciples.com/documents/IB_02.2006_Paul%20Watchman.pdf. Weisbach, M. S. 1988. Outside Directors and CEO Turnover, Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 431-460. Weitzner, D. and Darroch, J. 2009. Why moral failures precede financial crises, Critical Perspectives on International Business, 5(1/2), 6-13. Westphal, J. D. and Fredrickson, J. W. 2001. Who directs strategic change? Director experience, the selection of new CEOs, and change in corporate strategy, Strategic Management Journal, 22, 1113-1137. Wiseman, J. 1982. An Evaluation of Environmental Disclosures Made in Corporate Annual Reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 7 (4), 53-64. Woodruff, P. 2006. Educating engineers to create a sustainable future. Journal of Environmental Engineering ,132, 434–444. Wright, C. and Rwabizambuga, A. 2006,Institutional Pressures, Corporate Reputation, and Voluntary Codes of Conduct: An Examination of Equator Principles. Business and Society Review, 111(1),89-117. Wu, Y., Huang, S., Kuo, L., Wu, W. 2010. Management education for sustainability: A web-based content analysis. Academy of Management Learning and Education ,9, 520–531. Xiao, H. 2006. Corporate environmental accounting and reporting in china: current status and the future. In: Schaltegger, S., Bennett, M. and Burritt, R., Eds., Sustainability Accounting and Reporting, 457–471. Yammarino, F.J., Dansereau, F., eds. JAIElsevier Science, Oxford, U.K., 197–238. Yau, O. H., Lee, J. S., Chow, R. P., Sin, L. Y. and Tse, A. C. 2000. Relationship marketing the Chinese way. Business Horizons, 43(1), 16-24. Zahra, S. A. and Pearce, J. A., 1989. Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: A review and integrative model, Journal of Management, 15(2), 291-334. Zeng, S. X., Liu, H. C., Tam, C. M., and Shao, Y. K. 2008. Cluster analysis for studying industrial sustainability: an empirical study in Shanghai, Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(10), 1090–1097. Zeng, S. X., Xu, X. D., Yin, H. T., and Tam, C. M. 2011. Factors that drive Chinese listed companies in voluntary disclosure of environmental information. Journal of Business Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s10551-011-1129-x. Zhou X.G., Zhao W., Li Q. and Cai H. 2003. Embeddedness and contrctual relationships in China, American Sociological Review, 75-102. |
論文全文使用權限 |
如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信