§ 瀏覽學位論文書目資料
  
系統識別號 U0002-1707201801425900
DOI 10.6846/TKU.2018.00473
論文名稱(中文) 新任合夥人與審計品質之關聯性
論文名稱(英文) A Study of Association between New CPA Partner and Auditor’s Quality
第三語言論文名稱
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中文) 會計學系碩士班
系所名稱(英文) Department of Accounting
外國學位學校名稱
外國學位學院名稱
外國學位研究所名稱
學年度 106
學期 2
出版年 107
研究生(中文) 高榆岷
研究生(英文) Yu-Min Kao
學號 605600252
學位類別 碩士
語言別 繁體中文
第二語言別
口試日期 2018-07-01
論文頁數 35頁
口試委員 指導教授 - 徐志順
指導教授 - 孔繁華
委員 - 林芳綺
委員 - 張雅淇
關鍵字(中) 新任合夥人
審計品質
新受任客戶
關鍵字(英) New partner
New client
Audit quality
第三語言關鍵字
學科別分類
中文摘要
本文目的為驗證新任合夥人與受查公司之審計品質是否具備關聯性。本文之研究結果顯示,當新任合夥人擔任公司主查會計師時,新任合夥人與審計品質有顯著之正向關係,代表新任合夥人為了維護事務所及自身之利益,避免不必要之訴訟風險,會抑制公司進行裁決性應計數之盈餘管理,進而提升審計品質。本研究亦發現當新任合夥人擔任副查會計師時,若客戶為事務所新受任客戶,審計品質會顯著下降,本文認為原因在於新任合夥人在事務所合夥人會議中權力較低,易分配到財報品質較差之公司,且擔任副查時並無法規劃整體案件之查核,而導致與審計品質呈現反向關係之結果。
英文摘要
This study uses information from listed companies audited by the big four accounting firms for a total of eight years, 2009 to 2016 to investigate whether new partnership is relevant to audit quality.
  The results of this study show that under the condition that a new partner hold a post of the chief account, this new partnership will be positively and significantly related to the audit quality. This suggests that a new partner will protect his own rights and avoid lawsuits whenever he takes the initial appointment, hence the downward of DA also known as better audit quality. Furthermore, we find that if a new partner served as the deputy accountant and the customers are new at the same time, the audit quality of the auditors will be relatively low. We consider that a new partner may have lower rights between partners which result in assignment of customers with poor finance. In addition, being a deputy accountant means lack of overall programming which may lead to a negative relation between new partnership and audit quality.
第三語言摘要
論文目次
目錄
第壹章	緒論	1
第貳章	文獻探討與假說發展	4
 第一節 會計師審計品質	4
 第二節 審計品質之衡量	8
 第三節 新任合夥人	9
 第四節 新任合夥人與審計品質	13
第參章	研究方法	15
 第一節 研究流程圖	15
 第二節 實證模型	15
 第三節 變數定義	17
 第四節 資料來源	19
第肆章	實證結果與分析	21
 第一節 敘述性統計	21
 第二節 相關係數分析	22
 第三節 迴歸結果分析	24
 第四節 額外測試	26
第伍章	研究結論與建議	31
參考文獻	33
 
 
圖目錄
圖 1 1研究流程圖	3
圖 3 1研究結構圖	15

 
表目錄
表 3 1樣本篩選過程表	20
表 3 2產業分布表	20
表 4 1敘述性統計表	22
表 4 2相關係數分析表	23
表 4 3新任合夥人擔任主查及副查之審計品質	25
表 4 4新任合夥人擔任主查及副查並查核新客戶之審計品質	26
表 4 5新任合夥人擔任主查及副查並查核新客戶之審計品質	27
表 4 6新任合夥人擔任主查及副查並查核新客戶之審計品質	28
表 4 7新任合夥人擔任主查及副查並查核較重要客戶之審計品質	30
參考文獻
參考文獻
中文文獻
江景清,1999,審計品質與合夥人輪調制度之探討,私立東吳大學會計研究所碩士論文。
李建然與高惠松,2007,會計師事務所人力資本與審計品質之關連性研究。人力資源管理學報,第 7 卷第 3 期:45-64
林谷峻,1992,「我國會計師事務所合夥人盈餘分配報導」,會計研究月刊,第78期,62-65。 
李建然與陳政芳,2004,審計客戶重要性與盈餘管理: 以五大事務所組別為觀察標的。會計評論,第38期:59-80。
姜家訓與楊雅雯,2005,會計師事務所之產業專精及查核年資與盈餘品質之關係。當代會計,第6卷第1期,23-60
楊炎杰與官月緞,2006,客戶重要性與非審計服務是否影響審計品質? Enron後的觀察。會計評論,第43期:27-61。
劉嘉雯與王泰昌,2008,會計師任期與審計品質之關連性研究。管理評論,第 27卷第4期:1-28。
蕭百利,2017,新任合夥人之風險偏好,淡江大學未發表論文
賴春田,2000,會計師的業務、責任及會計師事務所組織的演變,台灣大學未發表論文
蘇裕惠,2005,會計師任期與審計品質,當代會計,第6卷,第2期:187-220。
英文文獻
A. A. Ketchand, R. E. Morris, and W. E. SHAFER. 1999. “An Analysis of The Role	of Moral Intensity in Auditing Judgments”, Research on Accounting Ethics Volume 5: 249-269.
Allen K. Hunt and Ayalew Lulseged, Client importance and non-Big 5 auditors’ reporting decisions, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 2007, vol. 26, issue 2, 212-248
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). SEC Practice Section. 	1992. Statement of Position Regarding Mandatory Rotation of Audit Firms of Publicly Held Companies. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
Beard, V. 1994. Popular culture and professional identity: Accountants in the movies. 	Accounting, Organizations and Society 19: 303-318.
Becker, C. L., DeFond, M. L., Jiambalvo, J., & Subramanyam, K. R. 1998. The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research 15(1): 1-24.
Carcello, J. V., and Nagy, A. L. 2004. Audit firm tenure and fraudulent financial reporting. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 23 (2): 55-69. 
Chang, C. J., and Hwang 1, N. C. R. 2003. Accounting education, firm training and 	information technology: a research note. Accounting Education 12 (4): 441-450.
Chen, C. Y., Lin, C. J., & Lin, Y. C. 2008. Audit partner tenure, audit firm tenure, and discretionary accruals: Does long auditor tenure impair earnings quality?  Contemporary Accounting Research 25(2): 415-445.
Da Simunic, Auditing, consulting, and auditor independence, Journal of Accounting 	Research, 1984, vol. 22, issue 2, 679-702
Davis, L. R., Soo, B. S. and Trompeter, G. M. 2009, Auditor Tenure and the Ability 	to Meet or Beat Earnings Foreca Contemporary Accounting Research, 26: 517–548. doi:10.1506/car.26.2.8
DeAngelo, L. E. 1981. Auditor independence,‘low balling’, and disclosure regulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics 3(2): 113-127
Dechow, P. M., & Sloan, R. G. 1991. Executive incentives and the horizon problem: An empirical investigation. Journal of Accounting and Economics 14(1): 51-89.
Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., & Sweeney, A. P. 1995. Detecting earnings management. Accounting Review 193-225.
Dirsmith, M. W., Heian, J. B., and Covaleski, M. A. 1997. Structure and agency in an institutionalized setting: the application and social transformation of control in the Big Six. Accounting, Organizations and Society 22 (1): 1-27.
Francis, J. R., & Yu, M. D. 2009. Big 4 office size and audit quality. The Accounting Review 84(5): 1521-1552.
Geiger, M. A., and K. Raghunandan. 2002. Auditor tenure and audit reporting failures.	Auditing: A Journal Of Practice & Theory 21 (1): 67-78
Gill, M. 2009. Accountant’s truth. Knowledge and ethics in the financial world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
J. Kenneth Reynolds and Jere R, 2000. Francis, Does size matter? The influence of large clients on office-level auditor reporting decisions, Journal of Accounting and Economics, vol. 30, issue 3, 375-400
Jones, J. J. 1991. Earnings management during import relief investigations. Journal of Accounting Research 193-228.
Kahneman, Daniel and Amos Tversky. 1979. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk. Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society 263-	291. 
Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., and Anderson, C. 2003. Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review 110 (2): 265-284
Kim, J.-B. and Yi, C. H. 2006, Ownership Structure, Business Group Affiliation, Listing Status, and Earnings Management: evidence from Korea, Contemporary accounting research, 2006, v. 23, no. 2, p. 427-464
Kothari, S. P., Leone, A. J., & Wasley, C. E. 2005. Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics 39(1): 163-197.
Krishnan, G. V. 2003. Audit quality and the pricing of discretionary accruals. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 22(1): 109-126.
Magee, R. P., & Tseng, M. C. (1990). Audit Pricing and Independence. The	 Accounting Review, 315-336
Myers, J., L. Myers, and T. Omer. 2003. Exploring the term of the auditor-client relationship and the quality of earnings: A case for mandatory auditor rotation? The Accounting Review 78 (3): 779-798. 
O’Flaherty, B. 1992. On the job screening, up or out rules and firm growth. Canadian Journal of Economics 25 (2): 346-368.
Palmrose, Z. V. 1988. 1987 Competitive Manuscript Co-Winner: An analysis of auditor litigation and audit service quality. Accounting Review 55-73.
Penn, Schoen and Berland Associates Inc. (PSB) 2000. Findings From National Investor Poll About Auditing and Financial Reporting. Washington D. C.
Peter Carey and Roger Simnett, 2006, Audit Partner Tenure and Audit Quality. The Accounting Review, Vol. 81, No. 3, pp. 653-676.
Pfeffer, J. 1992. Managing with power: Politics and influence in organizations. Harvard Business Press.
PricewaterhouseCoopers, L.L.P. 2002. Mandatory rotation of audit firms: Will itimprove audit quality? New York: Pricewaterhouse Coopers.
Richard M,1962, Power-Dependence Relations. Emerson American Sociological 	Review Vol. 27, No. 1 (Feb., 1962), pp. 31-41
Roychowdhury, S. 2006. Earnings management through real activities manipulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics 42(3): 335-370.
Sattar A. Mansi, William F. Maxwell and Darius P. Miller, 2004, Does Auditor Quality and Tenure Matter to Investors? Evidence from the Bond Market , Journal of Accounting Research, 2004, vol. 42, issue 4, 755-793
Shockley, R, A, 1981. Perceptions of auditor independence: An empirical analysis, 	The Accounting Review 56 : 785-800 
Spurr, S. J. (1990). Sex discrimination in the legal profession: a study of promotion.Industrial and Labor Relations Review 43 (4): 406-417.
Srinidhi, B., & Gul, F. A. 2007. The differential effects of auditors' non-audit and 	audit fees on accrual quality.
W.Robert Knechel and Ann Vanstraelen,2007, The Relationship between Auditor 	Tenure and Audit Quality Implied by Going Concern Opinions. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory: May 2007, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 113-131.
Wallman, S. 1996. The future of accounting , part iii: reliability and auditor independence. Accounting Horizons 10: 76-97.
Wang, S., and J. D' Souza. 2006. Earnings management: The effect of accounting flexibility on R&D investment choices. Working paper, Cornell University, New 	York.
Wines, G. (1994), Auditor Independence, Audit Qualifications And The Provision Of Non-Audit Services: Accounting and Finance, Vol. 34, pp. 75-86.
論文全文使用權限
校內
紙本論文於授權書繳交後5年公開
同意電子論文全文授權校園內公開
校內電子論文於授權書繳交後5年公開
校外
同意授權
校外電子論文於授權書繳交後5年公開

如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信