淡江大學覺生紀念圖書館 (TKU Library)
進階搜尋


下載電子全文限經由淡江IP使用) 
系統識別號 U0002-1706201413521500
中文論文名稱 政府援助與銀行資產風險: 加權障礙選擇權評價模式分析
英文論文名稱 A multiple-objective barrier option approach for government bailout and bank risk-taking
第三語言論文名稱
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中) 國際企業學系碩士班
系所名稱(英) Master's Program, Department Of International Business
學年度 102
學期 2
出版年 103
研究生中文姓名 林子豪
研究生英文姓名 Tzu-Hao Lin
學號 601550998
學位類別 碩士
語文別 英文
口試日期 2014-05-02
論文頁數 41頁
口試委員 指導教授-林志鴻
共同指導教授-蔡政言
委員-林志鴻
委員-蔡政言
委員-張慶暉
中文關鍵字 多目標障礙期權  政府救助  銀行追逐風險  違約風險  購買不良資產 
英文關鍵字 Barrier option  Government bailout  Bank risk-taking  Buy distressed assets  Default risk 
學科別分類
中文摘要 企業證券之障礙期權理論主要應用在不良貸款案例的緊急援助方案中,此銀行受損的效用其可能之請求權。特別的是,銀行的表現就像是單一效用函數,正向地喜歡報酬,而負向地厭惡破產。此框架直接的含意是以利潤所定義的期望效用將以向下出局之買權加以定價。本篇論文檢驗銀行最理想的利潤邊際,比方說在銀行參與緊急援助方案時,銀行貸款利率與存款利率之利差。我們從結果顯示當買下不良貸款的總量維持很高時,不良貸款案例總量的增加會使銀行本身持有的貸款以增加的邊際而遞減。這樣的緊急援助方案降低銀行所承受的貸款風險,更因此帶來銀行系統的穩定性。數據的運算顯示銀行報酬,在不考慮加權(標準之向下出局買權)或喜好因素(標準買權),此情況之期望效用的市場參數會導致顯著的高估情形。
英文摘要 The barrier options theory of corporate security valuation is applied to the contingent claims of a distressed bank’s utility under the bailout program of distressed loan purchases. In particular, the bank acts as if it has a single utility function that positively weights equity returns like, but negatively weights bankruptcy dislike. A direct implication of this framework is that the expected utility defined in terms of profits will be priced as a weighted down-and-out call option. This thesis examines the optimal bank interest margin, i.e., the spread between the loan rate and the deposit rate of the bank, when the bank participates in the bailout program. We show that an increase in the amount of distressed loan purchases decreases the loan amount held by the bank at an increased margin when buying distressed loan amount remains high. Bailout as such makes the bank less prone to loan risk taking, thereby contributing the stability of the banking system. A numerical exercise shows that the market-based estimates of the expected utility of bank equity returns which ignore the weights (a standard down-and-out call option) or the dislike (a standard call option) lead to significant overestimation.
論文目次 目錄
謝 辭 ................................................I
中文摘要................................................II
英文摘要................................................III
目錄 ................................................IV
圖表目錄................................................V
Chapter 1 Introduction.................................1
Chapter 2 Review of literature.........................6
Chapter 3 The model....................................10
Chapter 4 Equilibrium and comparative static results...18
Chapter 5 Numerical exercises..........................21
Chapter 6 Conclusions..................................34
References..............................................36
圖表目錄
Table 1 Equity components of bank expected value.......22
Table 2 Values of and when = 0.3*.................26
Table 3 Values of at various levels of in the valuation*..............................................29
Table 4 Values of at various levels of in the valuation*..............................................30
Table 5 Values of at various levels of in the valuation*..............................................32

Figure 1................................................23
Figure 2................................................23
Figure 3................................................24
Figure 4................................................24
Figure 5................................................27



參考文獻 References

Angbazo, L., 1997. Commercial bank net interest margins, default risk, interest rate risk, and off-balance sheet banking. Journal of Banking and Finance 21, 55-87.
Bebchuk, L.A., 2008. A plan for addressing the financial crisis. Working Paper, Harvard University.
Bhattacharya, S., Plank, M., Stobi, G., Zechner, J., 2002. Bank capital regulation with random audits. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 26, 1301-1321.
Black, F., Cox, J.C., 1976. The valuation of options for alternative stochastic processes. Journal of Financial Economics 3, 145-166.
Black, F., Scholes, M., 1973. The effects of dividend yield and dividend policy on common stock prices and returns. Journal of Financial Economics 1, 1-22.
Breitenfellner, B., Wagner, N., 2010. Government intervention in response to the subprime financial crisis: the good into the pot, the bad into the crop. International Review of Financial Analysis 19, 289-297.
Brockman, P., Turtle, H., 2003. A barrier option framework for corporate security valuation. Journal of Financial Economics 67, 511-529.
Chang, C.P., Lin, J.H., 2006. Bank as a liquidity provider and interest rate discovery: an option-based optimization. Expert Systems with Applications 31, 360-369.
Chou, H. C., Wang. D., 2007. Performance of default risk model with barrier option framework and maximum likelihood estimation: Evidence from Taiwan, Physica A, 385, 270-280.
Crouhy, M., Galai, D., 1991. A contingent claim analysis of a regulated depository institution. Journal of Banking and Finance 15, 73-90.
Davies, S.M., McManus, D.A., 1991. The effects of closure policies on bank risk-taking. Journal of Banking and Finance 15,917-38.
Elyasiami, E., Mester, L.J., Pagano, M.S., 2011. Large capital injections, investor reactions, and the return and risk performance of financial institutions over the business cycle and the recent financial crisis. Working Paper, Villanova University and Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.
Episcopos, A., 2004. The implied reserves of the bank insurance fund. Journal of Banking & Finance 28, 1617-1635.
Episcopos, A.,2008. Bank capital regulation in a barrier option framework. Journal of Banking and Finance 32, 1677-1686.
Farruggio, C., Michalak, T., Uhde, A., 2013. The light and dark side of TARP. Journal of Banking and Finance 37, 2586-2604.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, 2013. Failed bank list. http://www.fdic.gov/bank/individual/failed/banklist.html, Accessed May 31, 2013.
Finn, W.T. II, Frederick, J.B., 1992. Managing the margin. ABA Banking Journal 84, 50-53.
Gorton, G., Huang, L., 2004. Liquidity, efficiency, and bank bailouts. American Economic Review 94, 455-483.
Hawtrey, K., Liang, H., 2008. Bank interest margins in OECD countries, North American Journal of Economics and Finance 19, 249–260.
Hermalin, B.E., 2005. Trends in corporate governance. Journal of Finance 60, 2351-2384.
Hirtle, B.J., Stiroh, K.L., 2007. The return to retail and the performance of US banks. Journal of Banking and Finance 31, 1101-1133.
Ho, T., Saunders, A., 1981. The determinants of bank interest margins: theory and empirical evidence. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analyses 16, 581-600.
Hoshi, T., Kashyap, A.K., 2008. Zombie Lending and Depressed Restructuring in Japan. American Economic Review 98, 1943-77.
Hoshi, T., Kashyap, A.K., 2010. Will the U.S. bank recapitalization succeed? Eight lessons from Japan. Journal of Financial Economics 97, 398-417.
Hoshi, T., Kashyap, A.K., 2012. Defying Gravity: How Long Will Japanese Government Bond Prices Remain High. NBER Working Papers.
Kashyap, A.K., Rajan, R., Stein, J.C., 2002. Banks as liquidity providers: an explanation for the coexistence of lending and deposit-taking. Journal of Finance 57, 33-73.
Kim, D.H., Stock, D., 2012. The effects of TARP preferred stock issuance on existing preferred stocks. Journal of Corporate Finance 18, 1121-1142.
King, R.G., 2009. The great inflation drift. NBER Working Papers.
Klomp, J., 2013. Government interventions and default risk: does one size fit all?
Journal of Financial Stability 9, 641-653.
Maudos, J., de Guevara, F.J., 2004. Factors explaining the interest margin in the banking sectors of the European Union. Journal of Banking and Finance 28, 2259-2281.
Mazumdar, 1997. A dynamic model of firewalls and non-traditional banking. Journal of Banking and Finance 21, 393-416.
Merton, R.C., 1973. Theory of rational option pricing. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 4, 141-183.
Merton, R.C., 1974. On the pricing of corporate debt: the risk structure of interest rates. Journal of Finance 29, 449-470.
Odeh, O., Koduru, P., Featherstone, A., Das, S., Welch, S.M., 2011. A multi-objective approach for the prediction of loan default. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 8850-8857.
Propublica, 2013. Failed bailout investments. http://projects.propublica.org/bailout/list/losses, Accessed May 31, 2013
Ronn, E., Verma, A., 1986. Pricing risk-adjusted deposit insurance: an option-based model. Journal of Finance 41, 871-895.
Santomero, A.M., 1984. Modeling the banking firm. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 16, 576-712.
Saunders, A., Schumacher, L.,2000. The determinants of bank interest rate margins: an international study. Journal of International Money and Finance 19, 813-832.
Slovin, M., Slushka. M., 1983. A model of the commercial loan rate. Journal of
Finance 38, 1583-1596.
Tsai, J.Y., 2012. Risk and regret aversions on optimal bank interest margin under capital regulation. Economic Modelling 29, 2190-2197.
VanHoose, D., 2007. Theories of bank behavior under capital regulation. Journal of Banking and Finance 31, 3680-3697.
Vassalou, M., Xing, Y., 2004. Default risk in equity returns. Journal of Finance 59, 831-868.
Veronesi, P., Zingales, L., 2010. Paulson’s gift. Journal of Financial Economics 97, 339-368.
Williams, G., 2007. Drexel Burnham Lambert's bankruptcy and the subsequent decline in underwriter fees. Journal of Financial Economics 94, 472-501.
Wong, K.P., 1997. On the determinants of bank interest margins under credit and interest rate risks. Journal of Banking and Finance 21, 251-271.
Zarruk, E.R., Mdura, J., 1992. Optimal bank interest margin under capital regulation and deposit insurance. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 27, 143-149.
論文使用權限
  • 同意紙本無償授權給館內讀者為學術之目的重製使用,於2014-06-18公開。
  • 同意授權瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2014-06-18起公開。


  • 若您有任何疑問,請與我們聯絡!
    圖書館: 請來電 (02)2621-5656 轉 2281 或 來信