淡江大學覺生紀念圖書館 (TKU Library)
進階搜尋


下載電子全文限經由淡江IP使用) 
系統識別號 U0002-1706201222344400
中文論文名稱 工作特性、薪酬滿足知覺、薪酬設計原則對於系統開發專案成員工作態度與績效之影響
英文論文名稱 The impact of job characteristics, perceived salary satisfaction, salary design principles on work attitude and performance of project team members.
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中) 資訊管理學系碩士在職專班
系所名稱(英) On-the-Job Graduate Program in Advanced Information Management
學年度 100
學期 2
出版年 101
研究生中文姓名 彭及宣
研究生英文姓名 Chi-Hsuan Peng
學號 799630040
學位類別 碩士
語文別 中文
口試日期 2012-05-26
論文頁數 81頁
口試委員 指導教授-吳錦波
委員-鄭啟斌
委員-吳瑞堯
委員-連志誠
中文關鍵字 薪酬設計  公平認知  薪酬滿足  工作特性  工作滿足  結構方程模式 
英文關鍵字 Salary Design  Justice Perception  Salary Satisfaction  Job Characteristics  Job Satisfaction  Structural Equation Model 
學科別分類
中文摘要 人力資源管理為組織管理的要素之一,人力資源管理除了須重視如何取得良好人才的議題以外,要如何善用人資管理制度使組織有效提高績效,亦是組織管理人員關心的議題。回顧近年國內許多有關人力資源管理的研究,探討過薪資設計、薪資滿足、薪資公平及員工工作態度與工作績效之關係,但有關於資訊軟體開發專案中,少有研究其他因素影響組織成員其工作態度及工作績效,且也少有研究將薪資滿足和工作特性一起探討與工作績效、工作滿足、組織承諾的相關性。本研究係針對系統開發專案成員進行問卷發放,主要目的在於研究系統開發專案成員在專案中薪酬設計、公平認知、薪酬滿足、工作特性與工作滿足、績效之間的關係。本研究為實證型研究,以問卷調查法為研究方法,使用 SPSS 19版與AMOS 19版等套裝軟體進行基本統計分析與結構方程模式(SEM)分析結構方程模式以驗證其模型,總發放問卷為165份、回收有效問卷為152份。研究結果發現:薪酬設計、公平認知、薪酬滿足、工作滿足與績效有顯著相關,工作特性具有對薪酬滿足干擾效應。實務上,可解釋為薪酬滿足知覺與工作特性皆高的狀況下,專案成員會考量在專案中自身的工作特性,提升工作績效,進而達到工作滿足,以及取得組織認同。
英文摘要 Human resources management is one of the focus areas in organization. In addition to hiring talented people, how to make good use of human resources management system to function effectively and to improve organizational performance is of great concern by management. When reviewing recent studies on human resources management, such topics as the design of salary, salary satisfaction, pay equity and the relationships between employee’s attitudes and job performance are explored. However, regarding IT professionals in an information software development project team, there are few studies investigating the factors that impact on employee’s work attitudes and job performance, not to mention there are studies specifically on the relationships of salary satisfaction, job characteristics, and the relationships of job performance, job satisfaction and organizational commitment.This study employed survey research method. The questionnaires were administered to the members in the system development project team. The objective was to investigate how project team members perceived the payment structure and its related consequents, primarily the perceived justice, salary satisfaction, job characteristics and job satisfaction. The SPSS 19 and AMOS 19 statistical packages were used for basic data analysis and structural equation modeling. This study adopted convenient sampling, with 165 questionnaires administered to project members and 159 questionnaires returned. The results showed that all constructs, including design of salary, justice perception, salary satisfaction, job satisfaction, and performance, were significantly related. Job characteristics have moderating effect on salary satisfaction. In Practice, this implied that project team members, under higher perceived salary satisfaction and job characteristics, would increase work performance, in turn, enable job satisfaction and finally organizational commitment.
論文目次 目次 - V -
表目錄 - VII -
圖目錄 - IX -
壹、緒論 - 1 -
貳、理論與文獻 - 4 -
一、薪酬設計 - 4 -
二、公平理論 - 7 -
三、工作特性 - 10 -
四、工作滿足、組織承諾與工作績效 - 13 -
五、薪酬設計、公平分配、薪酬滿足、工作滿足、組織承諾與工作績效的關係 - 15 -
六、薪酬滿足、工作特性、工作滿足、組織承諾與工作績效的關係 - 17 -
参、研究方法 - 19 -
一、研究變項 - 20 -
二、問卷量表設計 - 23 -
三、資料蒐集 - 25 -
肆、資料分析與結果 - 27 -
一、資料分析方法 - 27 -
二、基本資料分析 - 28 -
三、信度分析 - 31 -
四、結構方程模式(SEM)分析 - 33 -
五、結構方程模式一階CFA分析 - 40 -
伍、結論與建議 - 58 -
一、研究結論 - 58 -
二、管理意涵 - 60 -
三、研究限制 - 61 -
四、後續研究建議 - 62 -
陸、參考文獻 - 64 -
中文部分 - 64 -
英文部分 - 66 -
附錄 本研究問卷 - 76 -
表目錄
表4-1 年齡統計 - 29 -
表4-2 性別統計 - 29 -
表4-3 職位統計 - 30 -
表4-4 年資統計 - 30 -
表4-5 學歷統計 - 31 -
表4-6 適配值摘要表 - 39 -
表4-7 薪酬設計原則標準迴歸權重SRW - 42 -
表4-8 薪酬滿足知覺標準迴歸權重SRW - 44 -
表4-9工作特性標準迴歸權重SRW - 45 -
表4-10 組成信度整理表CR / AVE - 48 -
表4-11 CFA調整前後之適配值整理表 - 49 -
表4-12 整體模型適配值整理表 - 51 -
表4-13 潛在變項相關路徑分析整理表 - 52 -
表4-14 修正後的SEM模型適配值 - 53 -
表4-15修正後潛在變項相關路徑分析整理表 - 53 -
表4-16 假設構面關係整理表 - 54 -
表4-17 共變路徑影響效果矩陣表 - 56 -
表4-18 直接效果矩陣表 - 57 -
圖目錄
圖3-1 研究流程 - 19 -
圖3-2 研究架構 - 20 -
圖4-1 SEM假設模型路徑檢驗圖 - 50 -
參考文獻 中文部分
[1] 任慶宗,《工作特性、工作滿足與組織承諾之相關性研究》,佛光大學管理學系碩士在職專班碩士論文,2009。
[2] 行政院主計處,〈消費者物價指數及其年增率〉。http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/public/Attachment/1112416351871.xls,2011。
[3] 行政院主計處,〈歷年各季國內生產毛額依行業分〉,http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/public/Attachment/1112416351871.xls,2011。
[4] 行政院主計處,〈歷年各業受僱員工每人每月平均薪資〉,http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/public/Attachment/1661875071.xls,2011。
[5] 吳明隆、張毓仁,《結構方程模式─實務應用秘笈》,2010。
[6] 洪清香,《工作特性對教育行政人員工作滿足之影響》,國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市,1979。
[7] 洪麗雯,〈總額預算、薪資公平與薪資滿足對醫師工作態度之相關性影響與探討〉,人力資源管理學報,第五卷,第一期,頁135-161,2005。
[8] 張瑋恩,《激勵與工作滿足關係之研究》,長榮管理學院經營管理研究所碩士論文,2000。
[9] 連淑君、余德成,〈薪資制度、責任感與工作績效之研究〉,人力資源管理學報,第四卷,第二期,頁047-059,2004。
[10] 陳春希、高瑞新,〈工作壓力與工作適應:探討不同工作特性基層警察人員組織承諾的調節效果〉,人力資源管理學報,第10卷,第4期,頁1-31,2010。
[11] 陳惠芳、陳怡菁,〈工作特性變動與心理賦權對組織承諾之影響研究-以民營化中之公營事業為例〉,人力資源管理學報,第6卷,第2期,頁49-69,2006。
[12] 湛瑄宇,《員工薪資滿足之前因後果之研究》,私立中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,2000。
[13] 黃麗如,《薪資設計要素、薪資制度、薪資管理程序對員工態度與行為之關聯性研究-以中國石油公司為例》,私立中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,1998。
[14] 黃英忠,《現代人力資源管理》,華泰書局,台北,1989。
[15] 楊雨亮、黃同圳,〈薪酬制度對組織績效影響之探討-以B公司為例〉,人力資源管理學報,第四卷,第二期,頁025-045,2004。
[16] 蔡玲玉,《薪資管理與勞資關係氣氛之研究》,國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,1989。
[17] 蔡蕙安,《工作特性、工作倦怠與職業承諾關係之研究-以台灣銀行產業為例》,大同大學事業經營研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市,2007。
[18] 諸承明,《薪資設計要素與組織效能關係之研究-以組織特性與任務特性為情境變項》,國立臺灣大學商學研究所博士論文,1995。
[19] 諸承明、戚樹誠、李長貴,〈薪資設計之文獻回顧與評論-建立『薪資設計四要素模式』〉,台北,人力資源學報,第六期,頁57~86,1996。
[20] 諸承明,《親愛的驢子,我把紅蘿蔔變大了-教你設計激勵性變動薪資》,中華人事主管協會講座,1111 人力銀行通訊社,黃秀惠紀錄,62期,頁11,2002。
[21] 諸承明、戚樹誠、李長貴,〈我國大型企業薪資設計現況及其成就之研究-以「薪資設計四要素模式」為分析架構〉,輔仁管理評論,第5卷,第1期,1998。
[22] 鍾振文,《薪酬滿足知覺、薪酬設計原則對於員工工作態度與績效之影響》,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,2003。
[23] 羅業勤,《績效管理-專業經理人手冊》,頁5-1~5-9頁,1998。
英文部分
[1] Adams,J.S. Inequality in Social Exchange. in Advances in Experimental Psychology, L. Berkowitz (ed.), Academic Press, New York, NY. pp. 267-299, 1965.
[2] Aranya,N.,Kushnir,T., and Valency, A. Organizational commitment in a maledo-minated profession. Human Relations, 39(5), pp. 433-448, 1986.
[3] Bergmann, T. J., & Scarpello, Vida Gulbinas. Compensation Decision Making. 4th ed 10, 2002.
[4] Bollen, K.A. and R. Hoyle. “Perceived Cohesion: A Conceptual and Empirical Examination.” Social Forces 69: pp.479-504, 1990.
[4] Bollen, K.A. “Political Democracy: Conceptual and Measurement Traps.” Studies in Comparative International Development 25:pp 7 24. Reprinted in On Measuring Democracy edited by Alex Inkeles, 1991.
[5] Bollen, K.A. and Robert Stine. 1990. “Direct and Indirect Effects: Classical and Bootstrap Estimates of Variability.” Sociological Methodology 20:pp.115-140,1990.
[6] Bollen, K.A. and Robert Jackman. “Regression Diagnostics: An Expository Treatment of Outliers and Influential Cases.” Pages 257-291 in J. Fox and J. Scott Long (eds.) Modern Methods of Data Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. (Revised 1985 SMR paper),1990.
[7] Bollen, K.A. “Overall Fit in Covariance Structure Models: Two Types of Sample Size Effects.” Psychological Bulletin, 107:256 259,1990.
[8] Bowey,A.,&Thorpe, R. Payment systems and performance improvement : parti-cipation in payment system design. Employee Relation, 11(1): pp.17-20, 1989.
[9] Brief,A.P. Attitudes in and around organizations.In D.Whetten(Ed.),Foundations for Organizational Science, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA,1998.
[10] Buitendach,J.H.and Witte,H.D. Job insecurity, extrinsic and intrinsic job satisfact-ion and affective organisational commitment of maintenance workers in a parastatal. South African Journal of Business Management, 36(2), pp.27-37,2005.
[11] Byrne, B. M. Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, application, and programming. New York: Routledge,2010.
[12] Carrell, M.R., and Dittrich, J.E. Equity Theory: The Recent Literature, Metho-dological Considerations, and New Directions. The Academy of Management Review. 3;2: pp.202-210,1978.
[13] Carmines, Edward G. and John P. McIver. Analyzing models with unobserved variables: Analysis of covariance structures . 65-115 in George W. Bohmstedt and Edward F. Borgatta, eds., Social Measurement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications,1981.
[14] Cranny,C.J.,Smith,P.C, and Stone, E. F. Job Satisfaction: How People Feel About Their Jobs and How It Affects Their Performance. New York, NY. MA:Lexin-gton Books,1992.
[15] Fan, X., Thompson, B., & Wang, L. Effects of sample size, estimation methods, and model specification on structural equation modeling fit indexes. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, pp.56-83,1999.
[16] Farrell,D.,&Rusbult,C.E. Exchange Variables as Predicators of Job Satisfaction, Job Commitment, and Turnover.The Impact of Rewards, Costs, Alternatives, and Invest-ments, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 27(1), pp.78-95,1981.
[17] Folger,R.,and M. A. Konovsky. Effects of proccdural and distributive just-ice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal 32(March):pp.115-130,1989.
[18] Fornell, C., and Larcker, D. F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error, Journal of Marketing Research. 18, pp.39-50,1981.
[19] Gill, D, and Stone, R. Fairness and desert in tournaments. Games and Econo-mic Behavior. 69: pp.346–364,2010.
[20] Guerrero, Andersen, and Afifi. Close Encounters: Communication in Relations-hips, 2nd edition. Sage Publications, Inc,2007.
[21] Hackman,J.R. and Lawler,E.E. Employee reaction to job characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 55, pp.165-183,1971.
[22] Hackman, J.R. and Oldham, G.R. Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(2), pp.159-170,1975.
[23] Hair, J. E. Jr., R. E. Anderson, R, J. Tatham and W. C. Black. Multivariate data analysis. 7th ed., Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall,2009.
[24] Heneman,R.L. Pay for performance: Exploring the merit system.N. Y. Pergamon Press,1984.
[25] Herzberg, F.,Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. B. The Motivation to Work(2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons,1959.
[26] Hirschfeld, R. R. Does revising the intrinsic and extrinsic subscales of the Minnesota satisfaction questionnaire short form make a difference. Educational Psychol-ogical Measurement, 60(2), pp.255-270,2000.
[27] Hogan, E.A.and Daniel A. Martell. A Confirmatory Structural Equations Analysis of the Job Characteristics Model. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Proce-sses, Vol 39, pp.242-263,1987
[28] Hrebiniak, L.G., & Alutto, J.A. Personal and Role-related Factors in the Develo-pment of Organizational Commitment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(4),pp.555-573,1972.
[29] Hulin, C. L. & Smith, P. C. Sex differences in job satisfaction. Journal of app-lied psychology. 48, pp.88-92,1964.
[30] Hunt, S. D., Chonko, Lawrence, B., & Wood, Van, R. Organizational commit-ment and marketing. Journal of marketing, 49, pp.112-126, 1985.
[31] Huseman, R.C., Hatfield, J.D. & Miles, E.W. A New Perspective on Equity Theory: The Equity Sensitivity Construct. The Academy of Management Review. 12;2: pp.222-234,1987.
[32] Joreskog, K.G., & Sorbom, D. LISREL 8:User’s reference guide. Chicago Scientific Software International,1996.
[33] Judge,T.A.,Locke,E.A., & Durham,C.C. The dispositional causes of job satisfac-tion: A core evaluations approach. Research in Organizational Behavior. 19.pp.151-188,1997.
[34] Kahn, Lawrence M. & Sherer, Peter D. Contingent pay and managerial perfor-mance. Industrial & Labor relations review. Vol. 43, special issue, pp.107-120,1990.
[35] Kuo, Y. F. and Chen, L. S. Individual demographic differences and job satisfac-tion among information technology personnel: an empirical study in Taiwan. Internati-onal Journal of Management, 21(2), pp.221-231,2004.
[36] Lawler, E. Pay and organization effectiveness: A psychological view. New York, McGraw-Hill, pp.215,1971.
[37] Lawler, E.E. and Porter , L . W .(1963) . Perception regarding management compe-nsation. Industrial relations.
[38] Locke E. A. The relative effectiveness of four methods of motivating employee performance. In K.D. Duncan, M. M. Gruneberg, & D. Wallis (Eds.), Changes in Working Life: pp.363-383,1980. London: John Wiley, Ltd.
[39] MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, pp.130-149,1996.
[40] MacCallum, R.C., and Hong, S. Power analysis in covariance structure modeling using GFI and AGFI , Multivariate Behavioral Research. 32, pp.193-210,1997.
[41] Mahoney, T. M. Multiple pay contingencies: Strategic design of compensation. Human Resource Management. Vol. 28, no.3, pp.337-347,1989.
[42] Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & Hau, K. T. An evaluation of incremental fit indexes: A clarification of mathematical and empirical properties. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling techniques . Mahwah , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.pp.315-353,1996.
[43] Maslow,A.H. Motivation and Personality(2nd ed.).New York: Harper and Row,1970.
[44] Mathieu, J. and Zajac, D. A review of meta-analysis of the antecedents, corre-lates and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin,108(2),pp.171-194,1990.
[45] Messick, D. & Cook, K. Equity theory: psychological and sociological perspe-ctives. Praeger,1983.
[46] Meyer, J.P., Allen N.J., and Smith, C. A. Commitment to organizations and occupations: extension and test of three-component conceptualization.Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, pp.538-551,1993.
[47] Milkovich, George T. & Newman, Jerry M. with the assistance of Milkovich, Carolyn. Compensation - seventh edition. 2-7, pp.217-219,2002.
[48] Morris , J.H., & Sherman , J.D. Generalizability of an Organizational Commitmant model. Academy of Management Journal,24(3),pp.512-526,1981.
[49] Mowday, R. T., and Porter, L.W., and Steers, R.M., Employee - Organization Linkage, New York, MA: Academic Press, 30,1982.
[50] Mulaik, S.A., James, L.R., Van Alstine, J., Bennet, N., Lind, S., and Stilwell, C.D., "Evaluation of Goodness-of-Fit Indices for Structural Equation Models," Psychological Bulletin, 105 (3), pp.430-450,1989.
[51] Price JL and Mueller CW. Handbook of organizational measurement. Marshfield, Mass.: Pitman,1986.
[52] Sankey, C.D., Assessing the employment exchanges of Business Educators in Arizona. Unpublished doctoral dissertation,Arizona State University,1999.
[53] Schumacker,Randall E. and Richard G.Lomax. A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling, 2th ed., Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,2004.
[54] Seashore,S. E. and Taber, T. D. Job satisfaction and their correlation. American Behavior & Scientist, 18, pp.346-368,1975.
[55] Sims,J.R., Keller,H.P.,& Szilagyi,A.D. Job characteristics relationship : Industrial and structural moderators. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 19.pp.159-212,1976.
[56] Spector, P.E. Industrial and Organizational Behavior(5th ed.). Wiley : Hoboken, NJ,2008.
[57] Steers, R. M. Antecedents and outcomes of organization commitment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, pp.46-56,1977.
[58] Stone, E. F., & Porter, L. W., Job characteristics and job attitudes: A multivariate study, Journal of Applied Psychology, 000(060), pp.0057-0064,1975.
[59] Traupmann, J. A longitudinal study of equity in intimate relationships. Unpubl-ished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin,1978.
[60] Ullman , J. B. Stuctural equation modeling. In Tabachnick, B.G., and Fidell, L.S. Using Multivariate Statistics (4th ed.):pp.653-771. Needham Heights, MA:Allyn and Bacon,2001.
[61] Wallace, Marc J. Jr. and Fay, Charles H. Compensation Theory and Practice. 13-87. pp.176-177,1983.
[62] Walster, E., Traupmann, J. & Walster, G.W. Equity and Extramarital Sexuality. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 7;2: pp.127-142,1978.
[63] Walster,E.,Walster G.W. & Bershcheid, E. Equity: Theory and Research. Allyn and Bacon, Inc,1978.
[64] Williams, L. J. and Hazer, J. T. Antecedents and consequences of satisfaction and commitment in turnover models: a reanalysis using latent variable structural power in organizations. Journal of Nursing Administration, 71(2), pp.219-231,1986.
[65] Williams,L.L. Impact of nurses job satisfaction on organizational trust. Health Care Management Review, 30(3), pp.203-211,2005.
論文使用權限
  • 同意紙本無償授權給館內讀者為學術之目的重製使用,於2012-07-17公開。
  • 同意授權瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2012-07-17起公開。


  • 若您有任何疑問,請與我們聯絡!
    圖書館: 請來電 (02)2621-5656 轉 2281 或 來信