§ 瀏覽學位論文書目資料
系統識別號 U0002-1607201923041700
DOI 10.6846/TKU.2019.00453
論文名稱(中文) 水電及碳管理與企業價值之關聯性-以台灣上市櫃製造業為例
論文名稱(英文) The relationship between management of water, electric and carbon with firm value ─ Evidence from Taiwan’s manufacturing industry
第三語言論文名稱
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中文) 會計學系碩士班
系所名稱(英文) Department of Accounting
外國學位學校名稱
外國學位學院名稱
外國學位研究所名稱
學年度 107
學期 2
出版年 108
研究生(中文) 劉俊孝
研究生(英文) Chun-Hsiao Liu
學號 606600400
學位類別 碩士
語言別 繁體中文
第二語言別
口試日期 2019-06-18
論文頁數 59頁
口試委員 指導教授 - 黃振豊
共同指導教授 - 孔繁華
委員 - 蔡瑤昇
委員 - 謝宜樺
關鍵字(中) 水電及碳管理
企業價值
企業社會責任
關鍵字(英) water
electric and carbon management
firm value
Corporate social responsibility
第三語言關鍵字
學科別分類
中文摘要
本研究旨在探討水電及碳管理與企業價值之關聯性,以2013年至2017年上市櫃有出具企業社會責任報告書製造業為研究對象。水電管理及碳排放方面之環境資訊從企業社會責任報告書獲得,企業價值之績效取自台灣經濟新報,並觀察產業耗能性之干擾效果。研究結果顯示,水管理方面,水量不會顯著影響企業價值,但高耗能產業有較高用水量的企業會有較高企業價值,高耗能產業用水密度減少也能使企業價值提升。電管理方面,電量不會顯著影響企業價值,但高耗能產業減少用電密集度可使企業價值增加。碳管理方面,碳排放量與碳排放密集度愈低的公司會有較高的企業價值,而高耗能產業更加強化的反映此關係。
英文摘要
The purpose of this study is to explore the relationship between water, electric,  and carbon management and firm value. The sample comprised of publicly listed manufacturing companies providing corporate social responsibility report from 2013 to 2017. The measure of firm value is based on both accounting performance and market performance, and energy intensive industry is used to examine the moderating effect. The results showed that water used not significantly affect the enterprise value, but has higher value in energy intensive industries. In addition, water density decrease also can significantly promote enterprise value in energy intensive industries. As to power management, power consumption not significantly affect the enterprise value, but reducing electricity intensity can increase enterprise value in energy intensive industries.  On carbon management, those companies having more carbon emissions and lower carbon emission intensity have higher corporate value, especially in energy intensive industries.
第三語言摘要
論文目次
目錄

第壹章	緒論	1
第一節	研究背景與動機	1
第二節	研究目的	4
第三節	研究流程	5
第四節	論文架構	6
第貳章	文獻探討	7
第一節	水電及碳管理	7
第二節	企業價值	9
第三節	水電及碳管理與企業價值關聯性理論基礎	10
第四節	水電及碳管理與企業價值	12
第參章	研究設計	16
第一節	觀念性架構與研究假說	16
第二節	資料來源與樣本選取	17
第三節	變數衡量與實證模型	19
第四節   因素分析	23
第肆章	資料分析	24
第一節	敘述性統計量分析	24
第二節   Pearson統計量分析	27
第三節   迴歸分析	28
第四節   額外分析	36
第伍章	結論與建議	48
第一節   研究結論	48
第二節   管理意涵	50
第三節   研究限制與建議	51
參考文獻	52
中文文獻	52
英文文獻	54

圖目錄

圖 1- 1 研究流程圖	5
圖 3- 1 觀念性架構圖	16
圖 4- 1 用水量、高耗能產業別與企業價值之比較圖	33
圖 4- 2 碳排放量、高耗能產業別與企業價值之比較圖	33
圖 4- 3 碳排密集度、高耗能產業別企業價值之比較圖	34
圖 4- 4 用電密集度增加、高耗能產業別與企業價值之比較圖	34
圖 4- 5 用水密集度增加、高耗能產業別與企業價值之比較圖	35

表目錄

表 3- 1 出具企業社會責任報告書之上市櫃製造業(2013至2017年)	18
表 3- 2 資料適合度檢定	23
表 3- 3 原變數與共同因素之共同性	23
表 3- 4 共同因素可解釋變量	23
表 4- 1 敘述性統計與T檢定	25
表 4- 1 敘述性統計與T檢定(接續上表)	26
表 4- 2 Pearson相關係數表	27
表 4- 3 迴歸實證結果-企業價值對電、水、碳	29
表 4- 4 迴歸實證結果-高耗能產業對企業價值與電、水、碳關係之影響	32
表 4- 5 用水量、高耗能產業別與企業價值之比較表	33
表 4- 6 碳排放量、高耗能產業別與企業價值之比較表	33
表 4- 7 碳排放密集度、高耗能產業別與企業價值之比較表	34
表 4- 8 用電密集度增加、高耗能產業別與企業價值之比較表	34
表 4- 9 用水密集度增加、高耗能產業別與企業價值之比較表	35
表 4- 10 遞延迴歸實證結果-企業價值對電、水、碳	37
表 4- 11 遞延迴歸實證結果-高耗能產業對企業價值與電、水、碳關係之影響	38
表 4- 12 資料適合度檢定	39
表 4- 13 原變數與共同因素之共同性	40
表 4- 14 共同因素可解釋變量	40
表 4- 15 會計績效對電、水、碳	41
表 4- 16 高耗能產業對公司績效與電、水、碳關係之影響	42
表 4- 17 市場績效對電、水、碳	44
表 4- 18 高耗能產業對市場績效與電、水、碳關係之影響	45
表 4- 19 遞延迴歸實證結果-電子業對企業價值與電、水、碳關係之影響  47
參考文獻
宋宜音,2009,環境揭露、環境績效與經濟績效關聯性之研究,淡江大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
宋國娟,2005,公司治理、環保績效與企業績效關聯性之研究,國立中正大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
林有志、邱炳雲與高茂峰,2008,更換經理人對公司經營績效之影響,會計與公司治理,第五卷第2期:1-28。
胡友貞,2002,企業環境績效與經營績效關聯性之研究,東吳大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。
祝道松、盧正宗、洪晨桓與楊秀萍,2008,環境績效對環境揭露與經濟績效的影響,當代會計,第9卷第2期;237-270。
高明瑞、劉常勇、黃義俊與張乃仁,2010,企業綠色管理、環境績效與競爭優勢關聯性之研究,管理與系統期刊,第17卷第2期:255-278。
張育琳與劉俊儒,2018,低水電有助於公司績效嗎,管理學報,第35卷第1期:103-136。
張鼎聲、黃俊榮與陳奕翔,2018,如何評估公司價值-常見的估值方法,勤業眾信通訊2018年11月號。
陳沛旬,2014,公司治理與企業價值和財務績效之關聯性,東吳大學國際經營與貿易學系未出版碩士論文。
黃劭彥、吳東憲與紀怡如,2009,企業網站環境會計資訊揭露影響因素之研究,會計與企業治理,第6卷第1期:1-30。
黃義俊與高明瑞,2013,以利害關係人為前因之綠色創新的採行與環境績效關係之實證研究,管理評論,第二十二卷第三期:91-121。
黃德舜,1998,企業財務分析:企業價值的創造及評估,初版,台北市:華泰。
溫肇東與陳泰明,1997,臺灣的綠色創新組織初探,台大管理論叢,第8卷第2期:99-124。
劉翠溶,2011,國立政治大學舉行之「中華民國發展史論文研討會:經濟發展組」,會後無註腳之通俗版收入《中華民國發展史經濟發展》。
簡金成,1994,污染防治設備投資與企業經營績效之實證研究,國科會NSC – 83-0301-H006-030 研究報告。
Andrew A. K. and J. L. Michael. 2001. An Empirical Study of Firm Environmental and Financial Performance. Journal of Industrial Ecology 5 (1): 105-116. 
Barret, J., and K. Segerson. 1997. Prevention and Treatment in Environmental Policy Design. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 33 (2): 196-213.
Berry, M. A., and D. A. Rondinelli. 1998. Proactive Corporate Environmental Management: A New Industrial Revolution. Academy of Management Executive 12 (2): 38-50.
Bragdon, J., and J. Marlin. 1972, Is Pollution Profitable? Risk Management 19 (4): 9–18. 
Callan, S. J., and J. M. Thomas. 1996. Environmental Economics and Management: Theory, Policy, and Applications. Irwin, Chicago.
Charter, M. 1992. Green Marketing: A Responsible Approach to Business. Greenleaf.
Clarkson, M. B. E. 1995. A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance. The Academy of Management Review 20 (1): 92-117. 
Dowell, G., S. Hart, and B. Yeung. 2000. Do Corporate Global Environmental Standards Create or Destroy Value?. Management Science. 46 (8): 1059-1074.
Elijido-Ten, E. 2004. Determinants of Environmental Disclosures in A Developing Country : An Application of The Stakeholder Theory. Accepted for Presentation at the Fourth Asia Pacific Interdisciplinary Research in Accounting Conference.
Evangelinos, K. I., and M. Oku. 2006. Corporate Environmental Management and Regulation of Mining Operations in the Cyclades, Greece. Journal of Cleaner Production 14 (3-4): 262-270.
Fogler, H. R., and F. Nutt. 1975. A note on social responsibility and stock valuation. Academy of Management Journal 18 (1): 155-160.
Fombrun, C., and M. Shanley. 1990. What’s in a Name? Reputation Building and Corporate Strategy. Academy of Management Journal 33 (2): 233– 258.
Freeman, R. E. 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman: Boston.
Fryxell, G., and J. Wang. 1994. The Fortune Corporate “Reputation” Index: Reputation for What?. Journal of Management 20 (1): 1–14.
Gale, B. T. 1972. Market Share and Rate of Return. The Review of Economics & Statistics 54 (4): 412–423.
Garvin, T., T. K. McGee, K. E. Smoyer-Tomic, and E. A. Aubynn. 2009. Community-company Relations in Gold Mining in Ghana. Journal of Environmental Management. 90 (1): 571-586.
Goodman, P. S., and J. M. Pennings. 1997. New Perspectives on Organizational Effectiveness. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.
Greeno, J. L., and S. N. Robinson. 1992. Rethinking Corporate Environmental Management. Columbia Journal of World Business 27 (3): 222–232.
Haines, R. W. 1993. Environmental Performance Indicators: Balancing Compliance with Business Economics. Total Quality Environmental Management 2: 367–372.
Hart, S. L. 1995. A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm, Academy of Management Review 20 (4): 986-1014.
Hill, C. W. L., and G. Jones. 1998. Strategic Management Theory. Houghton Mifflin: Boston.
Hillman, A. J., and G. D. Keim. 2001. Shareholder Value, Stakeholder Management, and Social Issues: What's The Bottom Line?. Strategic Management Journal 22 (2): 125-139
Huang C. L., and F. H. Kung. 2010. Drivers of Environmental Disclosure and Stakeholder Expectation: Evidence From Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics 96 (3): 435–451.
Hughes, S. B., A. Anderson, and Golden S. 2001. Corporate Environmental Disclosures: Are They Useful in Determining Environmental Performance?. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 20 (3): 217-240.
Ilinitch, A. Y., N. S. Soderstrom, and T. E. Thomas. 1998. Measuring Corporate Environmental Performance. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 17 (4/5): 383-408.
Jaggi, B. and M. Freedman. 1992. A Examination of The Impact of Pollution Performance on Economic and Market Performance: Pulp and Paper Firms. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 19 (5): 697-713.
James, P. 1994. Business Environmental Performance Measurement. Business Strategy and the Environment 3 (2): 59–67.
Jennings, Devereaux, and A. Zandbergen Paul . 1995. Ecologically sustainable organizations: An institutional approach. Academy of Management Review 20 (4): 1015-1052.
Jensen. M. C. 1991. Corporate Control and the Politics of Finance. Journal of Applied corporate Finance 4 (2): 13-33.
Judge, Jr. W. Q., and T. D. Douglas. 1998. Performance Implications of Incorporating Natural Environmental Issues into Strategic Planning Process: An Empirical Assessment. Journal of Management Studies 35 (2): 241-262.
King, A. A., and M. J. Lenox. 2001. Does It Really Pay to Be Green: An Empirical Study of Firm Environmental and Financial Performance. Journal of Industrial Ecology 5 (1): 105-116.
Konar, S. and M. A. Cohen. 2001. Does The Market Value Environmental Performance? . The Review of Economics and Statistics 83 (2): 281-289.
Liu, X., and V. Anbumozhi. 2009. Determinant Factors of Corporate Environmental Information Disclosure: An Empirical Study of Chinese Listed Companies. Journal of Cleaner Production 17 (6): 593–600.
McGuire, J., A. Sundgren, and T. Schneeweiss. 1988. Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance. Academy of Management Journal 31: 854–872.
Miller, R. L., and W. F. Lewis. 1991. A Stakeholder Approach to Marketing Management Using The Value Exchange Models. European Journal of Marketing 25 (8): 55-68.
Morck, R., A. Shleifer, and R.W. Vishny. 1988. Management Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Financial Economics 20 (1- 2): 293-315.
Morris, S. 1997. Environmental Pollution and Competitive Advantage: An Exploratory Study of US Industrial-Goods Manufacturers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Boston (Mass.).
Nehrt, C. 1998. Maintainability of First Mover Advantages When Environmental Regulations Differ Between Countries. Academy of Management Review 23 (1): 77-97.
Neu, D., H. Warsame, and K. Pedwell. 1998. Managing Public Impressions: Environmental Disclosures in Annual Reports. Accounting. Organizations and Society 23 (3): 265-282.
Ou, J. A., and S. H. Penman. 1989. Financial Statement Analysis and The Prediction of Stock Returns. Journal of Accounting and Economics 11 (4): 295-329.
Penrose, E. T. 1959. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. New York.
Porter, M. E., and van der Linde. 1995. Green and Competitive. Harvard Business Review 73 (5): 120-134.
Rockness, J., P. Schlachter, and H. O. Rockness. 1986. Hazardous Waste Disposal, Corporate Disclosure and Financial Performance in The Chemical Industry. Advances in Public Interest Accounting 1: 167-191.
Russo, M. V., and P. A. Fouts. 1997. A Resource-Based Perspective on Corporate Environmental Performance and Profitability. Academy of Management Journal 40 (3): 534-559.
Shrivastava, P. 1994. Castrated Environment: Greening Organizational Studies. Organization Studies 15 (5): 705-726.
Spicer, B. 1978. Investors, Corporate Social Performance and Information Disclosure: An Empirical Study. The Accounting Review 53 (1): 94–111.
Sulaiman A. Al-Tuwaijri, Theodore E. Christensen, and K. E. Hughes II. 2004. The Relations among Environmental Disclosure, Environmental Performance, and Economic Performance: A Simultaneous Equations Approach Accounting. Organizations and Society 29 (5-6): 447-471
Thomas, A., and R. Simerly. 1994. The Chief Executive Officer and Corporate Social Performance: An Interdisciplinary Examination. Journal of Business Ethics 13 (12): 959–968.
Wernerfelt, B. 1984. A Resource-Based View of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal 5 (2): 171-180.
Wood, D. 1991a. Corporate Social Performance Revisited. Academy of Management Review 16 (4): 691–718. 
Wood, D. 1991b. Social Issues in Management: Theory and Research in Corporate Social Performance. Journal of Management 17 (2): 383–406.
論文全文使用權限
校內
紙本論文於授權書繳交後5年公開
同意電子論文全文授權校園內公開
校內電子論文於授權書繳交後5年公開
校外
同意授權
校外電子論文於授權書繳交後5年公開

如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信