§ 瀏覽學位論文書目資料
  
系統識別號 U0002-1607201810142000
DOI 10.6846/TKU.2018.00438
論文名稱(中文) 運用權力依賴理論探討關係結構對關係轉介之影響—以競合為干擾變數
論文名稱(英文) Using power-dependence theory to explore the impact of relationship structures on relational referrals: The moderating effect of coopetition
第三語言論文名稱
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中文) 企業管理學系碩士班
系所名稱(英文) Department of Business Administration
外國學位學校名稱
外國學位學院名稱
外國學位研究所名稱
學年度 106
學期 2
出版年 107
研究生(中文) 林東君
研究生(英文) Tung-Chun Lin
學號 605610111
學位類別 碩士
語言別 繁體中文
第二語言別
口試日期 2018-05-31
論文頁數 71頁
口試委員 指導教授 - 張雍昇(ebawu@yahoo.com.tw)
委員 - 楊立人
委員 - 張敬珣
關鍵字(中) 權力依賴理論
競合
不對稱關係
對稱關係
關係轉介
關鍵字(英) Power-dependence theory
coopetition
asymmetric relationships
symmetric relationships
relational referrals
第三語言關鍵字
學科別分類
中文摘要
在全球化和溫室效應議題的發酵下,組織選擇適當的合作夥伴成為組織的重要課題。因此,現今市場多處於一個競合的氛圍。根據研究指出,透過關係轉介選擇合作夥伴有效降低風險和不確定性,且為雙方帶來強大的約束規範。但在長期的合作下,雙方之間的關係結構會開始產生不對稱/對稱關係,由過往文獻得知,權力依賴理論當中所提及,權力和相互依賴是影響雙方關係的主因,因此要適當管理與合作夥伴的關係,才能使關係更持續,且擴展關係網絡。
  本研究主要是以權力依賴觀點,瞭解廠商與合作夥伴之間的依賴關係,並探討競爭與合作如何干擾不對稱關係、對稱關係與關係轉介之關係,進而釐清有關廠商和合作夥伴關係發展以及權力依賴在雙方之間的影響和重要性。本研究採取紙本問卷發放以及電子郵件方式發放網路問卷,調查天下雜誌2017年所統計之1,000大製造業,選取上市、上櫃公司作為研究對象。一共回收246份完整問卷,有效回收率約達24.6%(246/1,000)。研究結果發現,競合關係有助於強化對稱關係與關係轉介間的關係;競合關係在不對稱關係與關係轉介間則無顯著干擾效果。再者,不對稱關係負向且顯著影響關係轉介;對稱關係正向且顯著影響關係轉介。整體而言,本研究貢獻有助於增進權力依賴理論、關係轉介以及競合等相關文獻的了解。最後,除了提出理論與管理意涵外,本研究亦提出研究限制以及未來研究方向。
英文摘要
In the context of the globalization and greenhouse effect issues, the organization’s selection of appropriate partners for cooperation has become an important issue for the organization. Therefore, today's market is mostly in the competitive-cooperated atmosphere. According to the study, the selection of partners through relational referrals can effectively reduce risks and uncertainties, and brings strong constraints to both parties. However, under long-term cooperation, the relationship structure between the two parties will begin to generate asymmetry/symmetry. It is known from past literature that the theory of power dependence has mentioned that power and interdependence are the main factors affecting the relationship between the two parties. Therefore, it is necessary to properly manage the relationship with the cooperation partners in order to make the relationship more sustainable and expand the network of relationships.
The purpose of this study is to understand the dependence between manufacturers and partners in terms of power dependence, and to explore how competition and cooperation interfere with the relationship between asymmetric relationships, symmetrical relationships and relational referrals, so as to clarify the development of related manufacturers and partnerships, as well as the influence and importance of the power dependence between the two parties. In this study, the approach of paper questionnaires and e-mail have been used to distribute online questionnaires to investigate the top 1,000 manufacturing industries in the World Magazine of 2017, and the listed companies and OTC companies have been chosen as research objects. A total of 246 complete questionnaires are recovered with an effective recovery rate of approximately 24.6% (246/1,000). The results of the study show that the coopetition can help to strengthen the relationship between symmetric relationships and relational referrals; it has no significant interference effect between the asymmetry relationship and relational referral. Furthermore, the asymmetry relationship negatively and significantly influences the referral; the symmetric relationship positively and significantly influences the relational referral. Overall, this study contributes to the promotion of the understanding of the theory of power-dependence, relational referrals, and coopetition. Finally, in addition to propose the theoretical and managerial implications, this study also proposes research limitations and future research directions.
第三語言摘要
論文目次
目錄
目錄	i
表目錄	iii
圖目錄	iv
第一章	緒論	1
第一節	研究背景與動機	1
第二節	研究目的	6
第三節	研究流程	7
第二章	文獻探討	8
第一節	關係轉介	8
第二節	不對稱關係與對稱關係	11
第三節	競合	14
第三章	研究方法	18
第一節	研究架構	18
第二節	假說推論	19
第三節	研究變數與操作化定義	24
第四節	研究樣本來源	28
第五節	資料分析方法	29
第四章	資料分析與研究結果	32 
第一節	研究環境與資料收集	32
第二節	測量題項與信效度檢定	39
第三節	研究結果	43
第五章	結論與意涵	46
第一節	研究結論	46
第二節	理論意涵	48
第三節	管理意涵	51
第四節	研究限制與未來研究建議	53
參考文獻	55
附錄:研究問卷	68
 
表目錄
表2-1關係轉介文獻整理	10
表2-2不對稱關係和對稱關係文獻整理	13
表2-3競合文獻整理	17
表3-1各研究假說	23
表3-2關係轉介之變數與衡量題項	24
表3-3不對稱關係與對稱關係之變數與衡量題項	25
表3-3不對稱關係與對稱關係之變數與衡量題項(續)	26
表3-4競合之變數與衡量題項	27
表4-1全球產業2020年平均成長趨勢(單位:十億美元)	33
表4-2台灣企業累積對外投資四大產業之金額與件數比重(%)	34
表4-3基本資料分析	37
表4-3基本資料分析(續)	38
表4-4驗證性因素分析	40
表4-5測量模型之結果	40
表4-6敘述性統計量、相關係數與AVE值平方根	42
表4-7層級迴歸之結果	45
表5-1研究假說之結果	47
 
圖目錄
圖1-1研究流程圖	7
圖3-1本研究架構	18
參考文獻
中文文獻
行政院經濟建設委員會,民國100年,未來產業及人力結構調整之研究。
段錦雲、王國軒、田曉明,「恐懼管理理論視角下死亡凸顯和權力感對助人行為的影響」,應用心理學,第二十四卷第二期,民國107年,153-163頁。
張雍昇、方世榮,「探討出口市場導向之前因與後果:互依不對稱為調節變數之影響」,管理與系統,第二十三卷第四期,民國105年,563-591頁。
郭英富、彭朱如、喬友慶,「國際合資事業不穩定性之探討」,台大管理論叢,第十八卷第一期,民國96年,183-210頁。
楊翔莉、張書豪、樊晉源,「臺灣科技產業結構的變遷與未來展望」,Research Portal,民國103年。
英文文獻
Anderson, E., and Jap, S. D. 2005. The dark side of close relationships. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(3): 75-82.
Anderson, E., and Weitz, B. 1989. Determinants of continuity in conventional industrial channel dyads. Marketing Science, 8(4): 310-323.
Anderson, E., and Weitz, B. 1992. The use of pledges to build and sustain commitment in distribution channels. Journal of Marketing Research, 29(1): 18-35.
Anderson, J. C. 1995. Relationships in business narkets: exchange episodes, value creation, and their empirical assessment. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23(4): 346-350.
Anderson, J. C., and Narus, J. A. 1990. A model of distributor firm and manufacturer firm working partnership. Journal of Marketing, 54(1): 42-58.
Anderson, J. C., and Narus, J. A.1999. Business market management: understanding, creating, and delivering value(1st ed.), Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall PTR.
Antia, K., and Frazier, G. L. 2001. The severity of contract enforcement in interfirm channel relationships. Journal of Marketing, 65(4): 67-81.
Auh, S., and Merlo, O. 2012. The power of marketing within the firm: its contribution to business performance and the effect of power asymmetry. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(5): 861-873.
BarNir, A., and Smith, K. A. 2002. Interfirm alliances in the small business: the role of social networks. Journal of Small Business Management, 40(3): 219-232.
Baum, J. A., Rowley, T. J., Shipilov, A. V., and Chuang, Y. T. 2005. Dancing with strangers: aspiration performance and the search for underwriting syndicate partners. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(4): 536-575.
Belaya, V., Gagalyuk, T., and Hanf, J. 2009. Measuring asymmetrical power distribution in supply chain networks: what is the appropriate method? Journal of Relationship Marketing, 8(2): 165-193.
Bengtsson, M., and Kock, S. 2000. Coopetition in business networks—to cooperate and compete simultaneously. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(5): 411-426.
Bouncken, R. B., and Kraus, S. 2013. Innovation in knowledge-intensive industries: the double-edged sword of coopetition. Journal of Business Research, 66(10): 2060-2070.
Brandenburger, A. M., and Nalebuff, B. J. 1995. The right game–use game-theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4): 57-71.
Brandenburger, A., and Nalebuff, B. 1996. Co-opetition. New York: Currency Doubleday.
Buchanan, L. 1992. Vertical trade relationships: the role of dependence and symmetry in attaining organizational goals. Journal of Marketing Research, 29(1): 65-75.
Burt, R. S. 2000. The network structure of social capital. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22: 345-423.
Burt, R. S., and Knez, M. 1995. Kinds of third-party effects on trust. Rationality and Society, 7(3): 255-292.
Carayannis, E., and Alexander, J. 1999. Winning by co-opeting in strategic government–university–industry randd partnerships: the power of complex, dynamic knowledge networks. Journal of Technology Transfer, 24(2): 197-210.
Chen, M. J. 1996. Competitor analysis and interfirm rivalry: toward a theoretical integration. Academy of Management Review, 21(1): 100-134.
Chen, M. J. 2008. Reconceptualizing the competition–cooperation relationship: a transparadox perspective. Journal of Management Inquiry, 17(4): 288-304.
Choi, T. Y., and Hartley, J. L. 1996. An exploration of supplier selection practices across the supply chain. Journal of Operations Management, 14(4): 333-343.
Chung, S. A., Singh, H., and Lee, K. 2000. Complementarity, status similarity and social capital as drivers of alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 21(1): 1-22.
Cohen, W. M., and Levinthal, D. A. 1990. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1): 128-152.
Coleman, J. S. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(1): 95-120.
Coy, P. 2006. Sleeping with the enemy. Business Week, 21(28): 96-97.
Cullen, J. B., Johnson, J. L., and Sakano, T. 1995. Japanese and local partner commitment to IJVs: Psychological consequences of outcomes and investment in the IJV relationship. Journal of International Business Studies, 26(1): 91-115.
Das, T. K., and Teng, B. S. 1999. Managing risks in strategic alliances. The Academy of Management Executive, 13(4): 50-62.
Das, T. K., and Teng, B. S. 2000. Instabilities of strategic alliances:an internal tensions perspective. Organization Science, 11(1): 77-101.
Doney, P. M., and Cannon, J. P. 1997. Trust in buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 61(2): 35-51.
Dyer, J. H., and Chu, W. 2000. The determinants of trust in supplier-automaker relationships in the U.S., Japan, and Korea. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(1): 259-285.
El-Ansary, A. I., and Stern, L. W. 1972. Power measurement in the distribution channel. Journal of Marketing Research, 9(1): 47-52.
Elg, U. 2008. Inter-firm market orientation and the influence of network and relational factors. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 24(1): 55-68.
Emerson, R. M. 1962. Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27(1): 31-40.
Fang, S. R., Chang, Y. S., and Peng, Y. C. 2011. Dark side of relationships: a tensions-based view. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(5): 774-784.
Fornell, C., and Larcker, D. F. 1981. Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3): 382-388.
Frankwick, G., Ward, J., Hult, M., and Reingen, P. 1994. Evolving patterns of organizational beliefs in the formation of strategy. Journal of Marketing, 58(2): 96-110.
Frazier, G. L., and Rody, R. C. 1991. The use of influence strategies in interfirm relationships in industrial product channels. Journal of Marketing, 55(1): 52-69.
Ganesan, S. 1994. Determinants of long-term orientation in buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 58(2): 1-19.
Ganguli, S. 2007. Coopetition models in the context of modern business. Journal of Marketing Management, 6(4): 6-16.
Gaski, J. F., and Ray, N. M. 2001. Measurement and modeling of alienation in the distribution channel: implications for supplier-reseller relations. Industrial Marketing Management, 30(2): 207-225.
Geyskens, I., Steenkamp, J. B. E., Scheer, L. K., and Kumar, N. 1996. The effects of trust and interdependence on relationship commitment: a trans-atlantic study. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13(4): 303-317.
Ghoshal, S., Korine, H., and Szulanski, G. 1994, Interunit communication in multinational corporations. Management Science, 40(1): 96-110.
Glick, W. H., Huber, G. P., Miller, C. C., Doty, D. H., and Sutcliffe, K. M. 1990. Studying changes in organizational design and effectiveness: Retrospective event histories and periodic assessment. Organization Science, 1(3): 293-312.
Gnyawali, D. R., and Madhavan, R. 2001. Cooperative networks and competitive dynamics: a structural embeddedness perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(3): 431-445.
Gnyawali, D. R., and Park, B. J. 2009. Co-opetition and technological innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises: a multilevel conceptual model. Journal of Small Business Management, 47(3): 308-330.
Gnyawali, D. R., He, J., and Madhavan, R. 2006. Impact of co-opetition on firm competitive behavior: an empirical examination. Journal of Management, 32(4): 507-530.
Gnyawali, D. R., He, J., and Madhavan, R. 2008. Co-opetition: promises and challenges. in 21st Century Management, Ed. C. Wankel. Thousand Oaks, CA, 386-398.
Gomes-Casseres, B. 1994. Group versus group: howalliance networks compete. Harvard Business Review, 72(4): 62-74.
Gomes-Casseres, B. 1997. Alliance strategies of small firms. Small Business Economics, 9(1): 33-44.
Granovetter, M. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6): 1360-1380.
Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic actions and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3): 481-510.
Gray, P. H., and Darren, B. M. 2004. Knowledge sourcing effectiveness. Management Science, 50(6): 821-834.
Grayson, K., and Ambler, T. 1999. The dark side of long-term relationships in marketing. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(1): 132-141.
Griffin, A., and Hauser, J. R. 1992. Patterns of communication among marketing, engineering, and manufacturing: a comparison between two new product teams. Management Science, 38(3): 360-373.
Gulati, R. 1995. Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1): 85-112.
Gulati, R., and Gargiulo, M. 1999. Where do interorganizational networks come from? American Journal of Sociology, 104(5): 1439-1493.
Gummesson, E. 1994. Making relationship marketing operational. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 5(5): 5-20.
Gummesson, E. 1996. Relationship marketing and imaginary organizations: a synthesis. European Journal of Marketing, 30(2): 31-44.
Gummesson, E. 1999. Total relationship marketing: rethinking marketing management from 4Ps to 30Rs, Oxford, London: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Gundlach, G. T., Achrol, R. S., and Mentzer, J. T. 1995. The structure of commitment in exchange. Journal of Marketing, 59(1): 78-92.
Gupta, A. K., and Govindarajan, V. 2000. Knowledge flows within multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 21(4): 473-495.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. 2006. Multivariate data analysis 6th ed. Uppersaddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Heide, J. B., and Weiss, A. M. 1995. Vendor consideration and switching behavior for buyers in high-technology markets. Journal of Marketing, 59(4): 30-43.
Homburg, C., Workman, Jr. J. P., and Krohmer, H. 1999. Marketing’s influence within the firm. Journal of Marketing, 63(2): 1-17.
Houston, M. B., Walker, B. A., Hutt, M. D., and Reingen, P. H. 2001. Cross-unit competition for a market charter: the enduring influence of structure. Journal of Marketing, 65(2): 19-34.
Huber, G. P. 1991. Organizational learning: the contributing processes and the literature. Organization Science, 2(1): 88-115.
Iyer, D. N., and Miller, K. D. 2008. Performance feedback, slack, and the timing of acquisitions. Academy of Management Journal, 51(4): 808-822.
Johnsen, R. E., and Ford, D. 2001. Asymmetrical and symmetrical customer-supplier relationships: contrasts, evolution and strategy. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual IMP Conference.
Johnsen, R. E., and Lacoste, S. 2016. An exploration of the ‘dark side’ associations of conflict, power and dependence in customer–supplier relationships. Industrial Marketing Management, 59: 76-95.
Keaveney, S. M. 1995. Customer switching behavior in service industries: an exploratory study. Journal of Marketing, 59(2): 71-82.
Ketchen, D. J., Snow, C. C., and Hoover, V. L. 2004. Research on competitive dynamics: recent accomplishments and future challenges. Journal of Management, 30(6): 779-804.
Kogut, B. 1988. Joint ventures: theoretical and empirical perspectives. Strategic Management Journal, 9(4): 319-332.
Kogut, B., and Zander, U. 1992. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3): 383-397
Kohli, A. K., and Jaworski, B. J. 1990. Market orientation: the construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 54(2): 1-18.
Kumar, N., Scheer, L., and Steenkamp, J. B. E. M. 1995. The effects of perceived interdependence on dealer attitudes. Journal of Marketing Research, 32(3): 248-256.
Lado, A. A., Boyd, N. G., and Hanlon, S. C. 1997. Competition, cooperation, and the search for economic rents: a syncretic model. Academy of Management Review, 22(1): 110-141.
Lane, P. J., Salk, J. E., and Lyles, M. A. 2001. Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures. Strategic management journal, 22(12): 1139-1161.
LeRoy, P., and Yami, S. 2009. Managing strategic innovation through coopetition. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 8(1): 61-73.
Levinthal, D. A. 1992. Surviving schumpeterian environments: an evolutionary perspective. Industrial and Corporate Change, 1(3): 427-443.
Levitt, T. 1969. The marketing mode. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Levy, M., Loebbecke, C., and Powell, P. 2003. SMEs, co-opetition and knowledge sharing: the role of information systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 12(1): 3-17.
Li, D., Eden, L., Hitt, M. A., and Ireland, R. D. 2008. Friends, acquaintances, or strangers? partner selection in R&D alliances. Academy of Management Journal, 51(2): 315-334.
Li, S. X., and Rowley, T. J. 2002. Inertia and evaluation mechanisms in interorganizational partner selection: syndicate formation among US investment banks. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6): 1104-1119.
Luo, X., Slotegraaf, R. J., and Pan, X. 2006. Cross-functional “coopetition”: the simultaneous role of cooperation and competition within firms. Journal of Marketing, 70(2): 67-80.
Luo, Y. 2007. A coopetition perspective of global competition. Journal of World Business, 42(2): 129-144.
Lusch, R. F., and Brown, J. R. 1996. Interdependency, contracting, and relational behavior in marketing channels. Journal of Marketing, 60(4): 19-38.
Ma, H. 1999. Anatomy of competitive advantage: a select framework. Management Decision, 37(9): 709-718.
Maltz, E., and Kohli, A. K. 1996. Market intelligence dissemination across functional boundaries. Journal of Marketing Research, 33(1): 47-61.
Matanda, M. J., and Freeman, S. 2009. Effect of perceived environmental uncertainty on exporter-importer inter-organisational relationships and export performance improvement. International Business Review, 18(1): 89-107.
Menon, A., and Varadarajan, P. R. 1992. A model of marketing knowledge use within firms. Journal of Marketing, 56(4): 53-71.
Meuleman, M., Lockett, A., Manigart, S., and Wright, M. 2010. Partner selection decisions in interfirm collaborations: the paradox of relational embeddedness. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6): 995-1019.
Meyer, H. 1998. My enemy, my friend. Journal of Business Strategy, 19(5): 10-16.
Miotti, L., and Sachwald, F. 2003. Co-operative R&D: why and with whom? an integrated framework of analysis. Research Policy, 32(8): 1481-1499.
Mitręga, M., and Zolkiewski, J. 2012. Negative consequences of deep relationships with suppliers: an exploratory study in poland. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(5): 886-894.
Moorman, C., and Rust, R. T. 1999. The role of marketing. Journal of Marketing, 63(special issue): 180-197.
Morris, M. H., Kocak, A., and Özer, A. 2007. Coopetition as a small business strategy: implications for performance. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 18(1): 35-55.
Mummalaneni, V., Dubas, K. M., and Chao, C. N. 1996. Chinese purchasingmanagers’ preferences and trade-offs in supplier selection and performance evaluation. Industrial Marketing Management, 25(2): 115-124.
Narver, J. C., and Slater, S. F. 1990. The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing, 54(4): 20-35.
Noordhoff, C. S., Kyriakopoulos, K., Moorman, C., Pauwels, P., and Dellaert, B. G. C. 2011. The bright side and dark side of embedded ties in business-to-business innovation. Journal of Marketing, 75(5): 34-52.
OŃeal, C. R. 1989. JIT procurement and relationship marketing. Industrial Marketing Management, 18(1): 55-63.
Palmatier, R. W. 2008. Interfirm relational drivers of customer value. Journal of Marketing, 72(4): 76-89.
Palmer, A. J. 2000. Co-operation and competition: a darwinian synthesis of relationship marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 34(5/6): 687-704.
Poppo, L., Zhou, K. Z., and Zenger, T. R. 2008. Examining the conditional limits of relational governance: specialized assets, performance ambiguity, and long-standing ties. Journal of Management Studies, 45(7): 1195-1216.
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., and Smith-Doerr, L. 1996. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 198(2): 116-145.
Provan, K., and Gassenheimer, J. 1994. Supplier commitment in relational contract exchanges with buyers: a study of interorganizational dependence and exercised power. Journal of Management Studies, 31(1): 55-68.
Reagans, R., and McEvily, B. 2003. Network structure and knowledge transfer: the effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2): 240-267.
Rindfleisch, A., and Moorman, C. 2001. The acquisition and utilization of information in new product alliances: a strength-of-ties perspective. Journal of Marketing, 65(2): 1-18.
Rindfleisch, A., and Moorman, C. 2003. Interfirm cooperation and customer orientation. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(4): 421-436.
Rogan, M., and Sorenson, O. 2014. Picking a (poor) partner: a relational perspective on acquisitions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59(2): 301-329.
Ruekert, R., and Walker, O. 1987. Marketing’s interaction with other functional units: a conceptual framework and empirical evidence. Journal of Marketing, 51(1): 1-19.
Szulanski, G. 1996. Exploring internal stickiness: impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2): 17-43
Tippmann, E., Scott, P. S., Reilly, M., and O’Brien, D. 2018. Subsidiary coopetition competence: Navigating subsidiary evolution in the multinational corporation. Journal of World Business, 53(4): 540-554.
Tsai, W. 2002. Social structure of ‘coopetition’ within a multiunit organization: coordination, competition, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing. Organization Science, 13(2): 179-190.
Uzzi, B. 1997. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1): 35-67.
Uzzi, B. 1999. Embeddedness in the making of financial capital: how social relations and networks benefit firms seeking financing. American Sociological Review, 64(4): 481-505.
Von Hippel, E. 1987. Cooperation between rivals: informal know-how trading. Research Policy, 16(6): 291-302.
Wathne, K. H., and Heide, J. B. 2000. Opportunism in interfirm relationships: forms, outcomes, and solutions. Journal of Marketing, 64(4): 36-51.
Wathne, K. H., Biong, H., and Heide, J. B. 2001. Choice of supplier in embedded markets: relationship and marketing program effects. Journal of Marketing, 65(2): 54-66.
Wuyts, S., and Geyskens, I. 2005. The formation of buyer–supplier relationships: detailed contract drafting and close partner selection. Journal of Marketing, 69(4): 103-117.
Xie, E., Peng, M. W., and Zhao, W. 2013. Uncertainties, resources, and supplier selection in an emerging economy. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30: 1219-1242.
Yang, Z., Zheng, H., and Xie, E. 2017. Performance feedback and supplier selection: a perspective from the behavioral theory of the firm. Industrial Marketing Management, 63: 105-115.
Yilmaz, C., Sezenb, B., and Ozdemir, O. 2005. Joint and interactive effects of trust and (inter) dependence on relational behaviors in long-term channel dyads. Industrial Marketing Management, 34(3): 235-248.
Zahra, S., and George, G. 2002. Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2): 185-203.
Zerbini, F., and Castaldo, S. 2007. Stay in or get out of the janus? the maintenance of multiplex relationships between buyers and sellers. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(7): 941-954.
Zhou, X., Li, Q., Zhao, W., and Cai, H. 2003. Embeddedness and contractual relationships in china's transitional economy. American Sociological Review, 68(1): 75-102.
Zhuang, G., and Zhou, N. 2004. The relationship between power and dependence in marketing channels: a chinese perspective. European Journal of Marketing, 38(5/6): 675-693.
論文全文使用權限
校內
紙本論文於授權書繳交後5年公開
同意電子論文全文授權校園內公開
校內電子論文於授權書繳交後5年公開
校外
同意授權
校外電子論文於授權書繳交後5年公開

如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信