應用軟體的開發提升了個人生產力及工作效率，更可以為生活及企業應用創造新價值，並協助企業強化競爭力。而現今應用軟體已成為完成工作任務最直接的利器，但一般任務執行時常伴隨不少外在影響因素，即是本研究主要想深入了解的兩個因子，分別為時間壓力及任務複雜度。因此本研究目的為探討使用者操作應用軟體時，不同時間壓力與不同任務複雜度對大腦腦波之影響。
本研究採實驗室實驗法，為2×2之二因子受試者間實驗設計，並利用腦波儀測量腦波變化。研究結果顯示，時間壓力與任務複雜度對大腦β波有顯著的交互作用；在高任務複雜度時，不同時間壓力下之大腦β波有顯著差異，其中有時間壓力時操作應用軟體之大腦β波明顯高於無時間壓力；此外，在有時間壓力時，不同任務複雜度下之大腦β波有顯著差異，其中高任務複雜度時操作應用軟體之大腦β波明顯高於低任務複雜度時；而在低任務複雜度或無時間壓力下，另一因子對大腦β波的影響皆無顯著差異。其研究結果，可作為日後時間壓力、任務複雜度及腦波相關研究之參考。

The development of application software enhances personal productivity and work efficiency. Furthermore, it creates new value for our life and for businesses; it helps enterprises to strengthen their competitiveness. Today's software applications have become the most effective tools to task completion, but in general the task execution is often accompanied by a lot of external factors. Thus this study aims to understand the two factors, namely, time pressure and task complexity; how they impact on brain wave when users operate the application software with different time pressure and task complexity. 
This study used laboratory experiment with a 2 × 2 factorial design, and used EEG device to detect brain wave changes. The results show that the time pressure and task complexity on the β brain waves have significant interaction; in high- complexity task, the brain β waves under different time pressures are significantly varied. When time pressure exists, the β brain waves are significantly higher than that when without time pressure. In addition, in high-degree time pressure, the β brain waves under different task complexity are significantly dissimilar. When high-degree of task complexity exists, the β brain waves are significantly higher than those of the low-degree of task complexity. However, when in low-complexity task and low degree of time pressure, the β brain waves do not show significant differences. These findings provide basic references for future research regarding the impacts of time pressure and task complexity on brain waves.

目錄
第一章	緒論.......................1
第一節	研究背景與動機.......................1
第二節	研究目的.......................3
第三節	論文架構.......................3
第四節	研究程序.......................4
第二章	文獻探討.......................6
第一節	時間壓力(Time Pressure).......................6
第二節	任務複雜度(Task Complexity).......................12
第三節	腦波(EEG).......................17
第三章	研究方法.......................27
第一節	研究假設.......................27
第二節	研究架構.......................29
第三節	研究工具.......................29
第四節	前測實驗.......................38
第五節	研究設計.......................40
第六節	資料收集與分析.......................46
第四章	資料分析與結果.......................53
第一節	基本資料分析.......................53
第二節	腦波數據分析.......................56
第三節	腦波圖像輸出結果.......................64
第五章	結論與建議.......................69
第一節	研究結果.......................69
第二節	研究貢獻.......................71
第三節	研究限制與建議.......................72
參考文獻.......................75
附錄一：正式問卷.......................80
附錄二：受測者須知及同意書.......................81
附錄三：Excel前測題目.......................82
附錄四：Excel正式受測題目.......................84

表目錄
表 2-1 任務複雜度定義.......................14
表 2-2 腦電波分類表.......................23
表 3-1 十二個操作鍵.......................32
表 3-2 時間壓力限制時間之分析結果.......................42
表 4-1 各實驗組別之性別分布表.......................53
表 4-2 各實驗組別之年級分布表.......................54
表 4-3 各實驗組別之接觸電腦時間分布表.......................55
表 4-4 各實驗組別之平均使用時間分布表.......................55
表 4-5 各實驗組別之Excel或其他試算表軟體熟悉度分布表.......................56
表 4-6 人數分配表.......................57
表 4-7 時間壓力與任務複雜度之常態性檢定分析.......................58
表 4-8 時間壓力與任務複雜度之Levene 檢定分析.......................58
表 4-9 大腦β波在不同實驗組合之敘述統計量.......................59
表 4-10 時間壓力與任務複雜度之二因子變異數分析.......................60
表 4-11 時間壓力單純主要效果檢定表.......................63
表 4-12 任務複雜度單純主要效果檢定表.......................64
表 5-1 研究假設結果表.......................71

圖目錄
圖 1-1 研究流程圖.......................5
圖 2-1 壓力的循環模式.......................8
圖 2-2 大腦基本結構.......................19
圖 2-3 腦電波波形圖.......................23
圖 3-1 研究架構.......................29
圖 3-2 實驗設備圖.......................31
圖 3-3 十二個操作鍵圖示.......................32
圖 3-4 四分割顯示.......................33
圖 3-5 六分割顯示.......................33
圖 3-6 平均分布圖示.......................33
圖 3-7 優勢波圖示.......................34
圖 3-8 水平頻譜圖示.......................34
圖 3-9 立體頻譜圖示.......................34
圖 3-10 腦波波型圖示.......................35
圖 3-11 相位圖圖示.......................35
圖 3-12 平均報告圖.......................36
圖 3-13 優勢波報告圖示.......................36
圖 3-14 頻譜報告圖示.......................36
圖 3-15 直條平均圖.......................37
圖 3-16 腦波研究電極貼片位置示意圖.......................37
圖 3-17 實驗流程.......................46
圖 3-18 傅立葉轉換步驟圖.......................48
圖 3-19 β波頻譜圖.......................48
圖 3-20 短時傅立葉轉換步驟圖.......................49
圖 3-21 β波時頻圖.......................49
圖 3-22 二因子變異數分析步驟.......................52
圖 4-1 相同任務複雜度下不同時間壓力對大腦β波之影響.......................61
圖 4-2 相同時間壓力下不同任務複雜度對大腦β波之影響.......................61
圖 4-3 有時間壓力及高任務複雜度時β波頻譜圖.......................65
圖 4-4 有時間壓力及低任務複雜度時β波頻譜圖.......................65
圖 4-5 無時間壓力及高任務複雜度時β波頻譜圖.......................66
圖 4-6 無時間壓力及低任務複雜度時β波頻譜圖.......................66
圖 4-7 有時間壓力及高任務複雜度時β波時頻圖.......................67
圖 4-8 有時間壓力及低任務複雜度時β波時頻圖.......................67
圖 4-9 無時間壓力及高任務複雜度時β波時頻圖.......................67
圖 4-10 無時間壓力及低任務複雜度時β波時頻圖.......................68

中文部分
[1]邱皓政，《量化研究法(二)統計原理與分析技術》，臺北市:雙葉，2005。
[2]邱晧政，《量化研究與統計分析-SPSS:中文視窗版貟料分析範例解析》，臺北市:五南，2008。
[3]吳明隆、涂金堂，《SPSS與統計應用分析》，臺北市:五南，2005。
[4]洪聰敏、石恒星(2009) ，〈腦波在運動心理學研究之應用〉，應用心理研究，第42期，頁123-161，2009年6月。
[5]連子惠(譯)，《桂冠科學百科全書6，人體的奧秘》(原作者：Brenda Walpole )，臺北市:桂冠，1995。
[6]張麗瓊(譯)，《小心電玩腦！》(原作者：森昭雄 )，臺北市:遠流，2005。
[7]張淑懿(譯)，《頭腦手冊》(原作者：久保田競)，臺北市:牛頓文庫，1986。
[8]劉儀(譯)，《潛能總開關》(原作者：Wise, Anna)，臺北市:方智，1998。
[9]劉金平、李紅鋒，〈期務服務缺失、時間壓力下的決策略和決策理論〉，河南大學學報，第48卷，第6期，頁73-78，2008。
英文部分
[10]Ahituv, N., Igbaria, M., & Sella, A., “The Effect of Time Pressure and Completeness of Information on Decision Making ,” Journal of Management Information System, vol. 15,pp.153-172, 1998.
[11]Albertson, L. M., & Kagan, D. M., “Occupational stress among teachers, ” Journal of Reseach and Development in Education, vol. 21 ,no. 1, pp.69-75,1987.
[12]Andreassi, J. L., Psychophysiology: Human Behavior and Physiological Response,3rd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum,1995.
[13]Asare, S., & McDaniel, L., “The effect of familiarity with the prepare and task complexity on the effectiveness of the audit review process, ” The Accounting Review, vol. 71,no. 2,pp. 139-159, 1996.
[14]Aston R., Principle of Biomedical Instrumentation and Measurement ,Columbus,OH: Merrill, 1990.
[15]Benson, L., & Beach, L., “The Effects of Time Constraints on the Pre-Choice Screening of Decision Options,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 67,no. 8,pp. 222-228, 1996.
[16]Ben-Zur, H., & Breznitz, S. I., “The Effect of Time Pressure on Risky Choice Behavior, ” Acta Psychologica, vol. 47,pp. 89-104, 1981.
[17]Berger, H., “Uber das elektrenkephalogramm des menschen,” European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, vol. 87,no. 1,pp. 527-570, 1929.
[18]Bonner, S., “ A model of the effects of task complexity. Accounting,” Organizations and Society, vol. 19,no. 3,pp. 213-234,1994.
[19]Burke, R. J., & Weir, T. N., Coping with the stress of managerial occupation, New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 1980.
[20]Bystrom, K., & Jarvelin, K., “Task complexity affects information seeking and use, ” Information Processing & Management, vol.  31,no. 2,pp. 191-213,1995.
[21]Campbell, D. J., “Task complexity: A review and analysis, ” Academy of Management Review, vol. 13,no. 1,pp. 40-52, 1988.
[22]Davidson, D., ‘A Coherence Theory of Truth and Knowledge,’ Truth and Interpretation: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Davidson, E. LePore, ed., Oxford: Blackwell,1986, pp. 307-319.
[23]Dhar, R., & Nowlis, S. M., “The Effect of Time Pressure On Consumer Choice Deferral, ” Journal of Consumer Research, vol. 25,no. 3,pp. 369-384, 1999.
[24]Dimoka, A., Pavlou, P., & Davis, F., “Neuro IS: The potential of cognitive neuroscience for information systems research,” Symposium conducted at the meeting of the International Conference on Information Systems, Montreal, Canada, Dec. 2007.
[25]Edland, A., & Svenson, O., ‘Judgment and Decision Making under Time Pressure,’ Time Pressure and Stress in Human Judgment and Decision Making. New York: Plenum, 1993, pp.27-40.
[26]Frost, P., & Mahoney, T., “Goal-Setting and the Task Process: An Interactive Influence on Individual Performance, ” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, vol. 17,pp. 328-350, 1976.
[27]Gallupe, R. B., The impact of task difficulty on the use of a group decision support system, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Minnesota, 1985.
[28]Gmelch, W. H., “Research Perspectives On Administrative Stress: Cause, Reactions Responses And Consequences, ” The Journal of Education Administration, vol.26 ,no. 2,pp. 222-231, 1988.
[29]Greenberg, J., & Baron, R.A., Behavior in organizations, 6th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1997.
[30]Hackman, J. R., “Effects of task characteristics on group products., ”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 4,pp.  162-187, 1968.
[31]Hall, D. T.,& Mansfield, R., “Organizational and individual response to external stress,” Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 16,pp. 533-547,1971.
[32]Ivancevich, J.M., & Matteson, M.T., Stress and Work a managerial Perspective, New York：Scott, Foresman, 1980.
[33]Iyer, E. S., “Unplanned Purchasing: Knowledge of Shopping Environment and Time Pressure, ” Journal of Retailing,vol. 65,no. 1,pp. 40-57, 1989.
[34]Janis, I. L., & Mann, L., A psychological analysis of conflict,choice, and commitment, New York: Free Press,1977.
[35]Keinan, G., Friedland, N., & Ben-Porath, Y., “Decision Making under Stress: Scanning of Alternatives under Physical Threat, ” Acta Psychologica, vol. 64,pp. 219-228, 1987.
[36]Latham, G. P., & Yukl, G. A., “A review of research on the application of goal setting in organizations, ” Academy of Management Journal, vol. 18,pp. 824-845,1975.
[37]Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S., Stress, appraisal, and coping, New York, NY: Springer, 1984.
[38]March, J. G., & Simon, H. A., Organizations, New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1958.
[39]Maule, A. J., & Hockey, G. R. J. , ‘State, stress and time pressure,’ In Svenson O. and Maule A. J. (Eds.), Time pressure and stress in human judgment and decision making,New York: Plenum, 1993,pp. 83-101. 
[40]Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A., “Employee Creativity: Personal and Contextual Factors at Work, ” Academy of Management Jounal, vol. 39,no. 3,pp. 607-635, 1996.
[41]Ordonez, L. & Benson L., “Decisions under Time Pressure: How Time 0. Constraint Affect Risky Decision Making, ” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 71,no. 8, pp. 121-140, 1997.
[42]Payne, J., “Task complexity and contingent in decision-making: An information search and protocol analysis,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 16, pp. 300-316, 1976.
[43]Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson E. J., “Adaptive Strategy Selection in Decision Making, ” Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol. 14,no. 7,pp. 534-552, 1988.
[44]Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R. & Luce, M. F., “When time is money: Decision behavior under opportunity-cost time pressure,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 66, pp. 131-152, 1996.
[45]Schroder, H., Driver, M., & Streufert, S., Human information processing, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1967.
[46]Selye, H., The stress of life, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1956.
[47]Shaw, M. E., “Some effects of problem complexity upon problem solution efficiency in different communication nets, ” Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol. 48,no. 3,pp. 211-217, 1954.
[48]Shaw, M. E., Scaling group tasks: A method for dimensional analysis (Tech.Rep.No.1). Gainesville:University of Florida, 1963.
[49]Smith, J. F., Mitchell,T. R., & Beach, L. R., “A Cost-Benefit Mechanism for Selecting Problem-Solving Strategies: Some Extension and Empirical Tests,” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, vol. 29,no. 6,pp. 370-396, 1982.
[50]Svenson, O., & Benson, L.U., ‘Framing and Time Pressure in Decision Making,’in Time Pressure and Stress in Human Judgment and Decision Making, ed. Ola Svenson and A. John Maule, New York: Plenum Press, 1993, pp. 133-144.
[51]Svenson, O., & Edland, A., “Change of Preferences under Time Pressure: Choices and Judgments,” Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, vol. 28,pp. 322-330, 1987.
[52]Svenson, O. & Maule A. J., Time pressure and stress in Human Judgment and Decision Making, New York: Plenum Press, 1993.
[53]Terborg, J. R., & Miller, H. E., “Motivation, behavior, and performance: A closer examination of goal setting and monetary incentives, ” Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 63, pp. 29-39, 1978.
[54]Wood, R. E., “Task complexity: Definition of the construct,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 37,no. 1,pp. 60-82, 1986.
[55]Wood, R. E., Mento, A. J., & Locke, E. A., “Task complexity as a moderator of goal effects: A metaanalysis, ” Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 72,pp. 416-425, 1987.
[56]Wright, P., “The Harassed Decision Maker: Time Pressures, Distractions, and the Use of Evidence,” Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 59,no. 10,pp. 555-561, 1974.
[57]Zakay, D., “Time estimation methods-do they influence prospective duration estimates? ” Perception, vol. 22,pp. 91-101, 1993.