§ 瀏覽學位論文書目資料
  
系統識別號 U0002-1607200716303500
DOI 10.6846/TKU.2007.00453
論文名稱(中文) 台灣平衡型基金績效衡量指標及特徵因子之研究
論文名稱(英文) Balanced Fund Performance and Characteristics in Taiwan
第三語言論文名稱
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中文) 財務金融學系碩士在職專班
系所名稱(英文) Department of Banking and Finance
外國學位學校名稱
外國學位學院名稱
外國學位研究所名稱
學年度 95
學期 2
出版年 96
研究生(中文) 周靜芬
研究生(英文) Ching-fen,Chou
學號 794490440
學位類別 碩士
語言別 繁體中文
第二語言別
口試日期 2007-06-20
論文頁數 64頁
口試委員 指導教授 - 顧廣平(108144@mail.tku.edu.tw)
委員 - 葉立仁
委員 - 楊馥如
委員 - 謝文良
委員 - 顧廣平
關鍵字(中) 平衡型基金
基金特徵
關鍵字(英) balance fund
fund characteristics
第三語言關鍵字
學科別分類
中文摘要
隨著共同基金成為投資人重要投資工具之一,探討共同基金相關課題之學術研究也隨之大幅增加。本研究利用Black, Jensen and Scholes(1972)的市場單因子模式、Fama and French(1993)之市場、規模、淨值市價比三因子模式、Carhart(1997)之市場、規模、淨值市價比、動能四因子模式等三種國內外最常引用之因子模式,以及增加利率因子之市場、利率二因子模式;市場、規模、淨值市價比、利率四因子模式;市場、規模、淨值市價比、動能、利率五因子模式等三種增加利率因子之模式。判斷各因子對平衡型基金超額報酬變異是否具有解釋能力,以瞭解各基金特徵對基金績效之預測能力。另外,由基金特徵來探討對平衡型基金績效之預測能力,國內平衡型基金經理人藉由對市場的看法,藉由股、債間靈活調整,達到「進可攻、退可守」的資產配置能力。而本研究亦發現國內平衡型基金規模與基金績效間呈正向變動,故投資人在投資國內平衡型基金時,除了考量經理費及保管費外,應將平衡型基金資產規模納入考量,才能使投資更具有效率。
英文摘要
Since the mutual funds is influential to investors’ capital management, it becomes an important topical subject of research. The popular indices of personal performance evaluation, Goetzmann and Ibbotson (1994)、Brown, Goetzmann and Ross (1995)、Elton, Gruber, and Blake (1996), have a number of reported in the literature. This study tries to use a Black, Jensen and Scholes(1972)’s one factor model,Fama and French(1993)’s three factor model(market factor, size-related factor, book-to-market related factor) and Carhart(1997)’s four factor model (Fama-French three- factor model and momentum factor to assemble into four-factor model) and  proposes the five-factor model that includes the fifth factor, bond index to evaluate the characteristics of the mutual funds in Taiwan and further to examine the influential factors on efficiency. The research period of this study is three years from 2002 to 2006 and this study consists of 1570 samples .The research results reveal that the Carhart(1997)’s four factor model and five-factor model is due to more efficiently and then both the academician and the practitioner benefit from this research.Then we compare the domestic stocks and bond market to see how they management the. mutual fund Finally, we provide the investors with some ideas how to choose a better  fund by considering some factors: asset size, total fees ratio, and custodian fee.
第三語言摘要
論文目次
目             錄	Ⅰ
圖    表   目  次	Ⅲ
第一章  緒論	1
第一節  研究背景與動機	1
第二節  研究目的	5
第三節  研究架構	6
第二章  文獻探討	8
第一節 平衡型基金簡介	8
第二節 共同基金傳統整體績效評估模式	10
第三節  傳統模型所面臨之問題與影響	15
第四節 共同基金傳統報酬擇時能力評估模式	17
第三章  研究方法	22
第一節  研究對象及資料處理	22
第二節  衡量基金績效的因子模式	25
第三節  基金特徵與經理人屬性	29
第四節  分析基金績效與各特徵變數關係的模式	32
第四章   研究結果與分析	34
第一節 因子溢酬	34
第二節  因子模式	36
第三節  衡量平衡型基金之最適因子模式	45
第四節 基金績效與基金特徵之敘述統計	49
第五節 基金績效與基金特徵間的橫斷面關係	52
第五章   結論與建議	57
第一節 結論	57
第二節 建議	60
參考文獻	62
 
圖、表目次
表2.1:國內平衡型基金募集成立概況…………………………………9
表3.1:本研究選取樣本之分月與分類型統計表……………………23
表4.1:因子攸關溢酬(%)之敍述統計…………………………………35
表4.2:平衡型基金超額報酬之統計結果……………………………37
表4.3:市場單因子模式之估計與檢定結果…………………………38
表4.4:市場、利率二因子模式之估計與檢定結果…………………39
表4.5:市場、規模、淨值市價比三因子模式之估計與檢定結果..41
表4.6:市場、規模、淨值市價比及利率四因子模式之估計與檢定結果………………………………………………………………………42
表4.7:市場、規模、淨值市價比及動能四因子模式之估計與檢定結果………………………………………………………………………43
表4.8:市場、規模、淨值市價比、動能及利率五因子模式之估計與檢定結果………………………………………………………………45
表4.9 :各因子模式判定係數與推論結果彙整表…………………46
表4.10 :因子模式迴歸係數估計值敘述統計………………………48
表4.11 :平衡型基金績效估計值與特徵變數之敘述統計…………51
表4.12:12個基金特徵與基金績效間之橫斷面關係………………55
圖1.1:研究架構與流程圖………………………………………………7
圖3.1:平衡型基金與市場投資組合報酬指數化後的趨勢比較圖…25
參考文獻
參考文獻
【中文參考文獻】
林修葳和王佳真(2002),「臺灣共同基金績效持續性之研究」,《管理學報》,第20卷第4期,655-688。
許培基、陳軒基、杜明哲(2003),「共同基金持股之績效解構與資訊內容」,《證券市場發展季刊》,第15卷第3期,1-26。
陳安琳、洪嘉苓、李文智(2001),「共同基金經理團隊屬性與基金績效之研究」,《證券市場發展季刊》,第13卷第3期,1-27。
顧廣平(2002),「台灣上市(櫃)公司股票期望報酬橫斷面差異解釋因子之探討」,《亞太社會科技學報》,第2卷第1期,139-164。
顧廣平(2003),「台灣新上市股票短期與長期績效之再探討」,《證券市場發展季刊》,第15卷第1期,1-40。
顧廣平(2005),「單因子、三因子或四因子模式」,《證券市場發展季刊》,第17卷第2期,101-145。

【英文參考文獻】
Admati, A.R. and S.A. Ross, 1985, “Measuring investment performance in rational expectations equilibrium model,” Journal of Business , 58, 1-26.
Brown, S. J. and W.N. Goetzmann, 1995, “Performance persistence,”Journal of Finance, 50, 679-698.
Brown, D. J., W. N. Goetzmann, R. G. Ibbotson and S. A. Ross, 1992, “Survivorship bias in performance studies,” Review of Financial Studies , 5, 53-580.
Brown, S. J. and W.N. Goetzmann, and S.A. Ross, 1995, “Survival,”Journal  of Finance, 50, 853–873.
Blake, Christopher R., Edwin J. Elton and Martin J. Gruber, 1993, “The performance of bond mutual funds,” Journal of Business  , 66, 371-403.
Carhart, M. M., 1997, “On persistence in mutual fund performance,” Journal of Finance , 52, 57-82.
Chevalier, J. and G. Ellison, 1999, “ Are some mutual fund managers better than others Cross-sectional patterns in behavior and performance,” Journal of Finance , 54, 875-889.
Daniel, K. and S. Titman, 1997, “Evidence on the characteristics of cross sectional variation in stock returns,” Journal of Finance, 52, 1-33.
Daniel, K., M. Grinblatt, S. Titman and R. Wermers, 1997, “Measuring mutual fund performance with characteristic-based benchmarks,” Journal of Finance , 52, 1038-1058.
Davis, J. L., 2001, “Mutual fund performance and manager style,” Financial Analysis Journal  , 57, 19-27.
Dellva, W. L. and G. T. Olson, 1998, “The relationship between mutual fund fees and expenses and their effect on performance,” Financial Review , 36, 39-54.
Droms, W. G. and D. A. Walker, 1996, “Mutual find investment performance,” Quarterly Review of Economicsand  Finance, 36, 347-363.
Dybvig, P. and S. A. Ross, 1985,” Differential information and performance measurement using a security market line,” Journal of Finance , 40, 383-399.
Elton, E. J., M. J. Gruber, and C. R. Blake, 1996,”Survivorship bias and mutual fund performance, ”Review of Financial Studies , 9, 1097-1120.
Elton, E. J., M. J. Gruber, S. Das and C. R. Blake, 1996,”The persistence of risk-adjusted mutual fund performance,” Journal of Business , 69, 133-167.
Elton, E. J., M. J. Gruber, S. Das and M. Hlavka, 1993, “Efficiency with costly information: A re-interpretation of evidence from managed portfolios,” Review of Financial  Studies , 6, 1-21.
Fama, E. F. and K. R. French, 1992,“ The cross-section of expected returns,” Journal of Finance , 47,427-465.
Fama, E. F. and K. R. French, 1993 ,” Common risk factors in the returns on bonds and stocks,” Journal of Financial Economics , 33, 3-56.
Grinblatt, M. and S. Titman, 1989, “Mutual fund performance: An analysis of quarterly portfolio holdings,” Journal of Business, 62, 394-415.
Grinblatt, M. and S. Titman, 1992,“The persistence of mutual fund performance,” Journal of Finance, 47, 1977-1984.
Grinblatt, M. and S. Titman, 1994,” A study of monthly mutual fund returns and portfolio performance evaluation techniques,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , 29, 419-444.
Grinblatt, M. and S. Titman, 1993,” Performance measurement without benchmarks: An examination of mutual fund returns,” Journal of Business, 66, 47-68.
Grinblatt, M., S. Titman and R. Wermers, 1995, “Momentum investment strategies, portfolio performance, and Herding: A study of mutual fund behavior,”American Economic Review, 85, 1088-1105.
Gruber, M. J., 1996, “Another puzzle: The growth in actively managed mutual funds,” Journal of Finance, 51,783-810.
Goetzmann. W. N. and R. G. Ibbotson, 1994, “Do winners repeat Patterns in mutual fund performance,” Journal of Portfolio Management, 20, 9-18.
Golec, J. H.,1996, “The effects of mutual fund managers’characteristics on their portfolio performance, risk and fees,” Financial Services Review, 5, 133-148.
Hendricks, D, J. Patel and R. Zeckkauser, 1993, “Hot hands in mutual funds: Short-run persistence of relative performance,” 1974-88, Journal of Finance, 48, 93-130.
Ippolito, R. A., 1989, “Efficiency with costly information: A study of mutual fund performance,”1965-84, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104, 1-23.
Jagannathan, R. and Z. Wang , 1996 , “The Conditional CAPM and The Cross-Section of Expected Returns,”Journal of Finance, 51, 3-54.
Jensen, M. C., 1968, “The performance of mutual funds in the period of 1945-1964,”Journal of Finance , 23, 16-26.
Kothari, S. P. and J. B. Warner, 2001, “Evaluating Mutual Fund Performance,” The Journal of Finance  ,56, 1985-2010.
 Lehmann, B.N., and D.M. Modest, 1987, “Mutual Fund Performance Evaluation:A Comparison of Benchmarks and Benchmark Comparisons,” Journal of Finance ,42 , 233-265.
Liljeblom, E. and A. Loflund ,2000, “Determinants of International Portfolio Investment Flows to a Small Market: Empirical Evidence,” Working Paper.
Malkiel, B., 1995, “Returns from Investing in Equity Mutual Funds 1971 to 1991,”Journal of Finance, 50, 549-572.
Prather L , Bertin W J , Henker T., ,2004, “Mutual Fund Characteristics Managerial Attributes and Fund Performance,” Review of Financial Economics,13,305-326.
Sharpe,W. F., 1966,” Mutual fund performance”, Journal of Business, 39, 119-139.
Treyor, J. L., 1965, “How to rate management of investment funds”, Harvard Business Review , 43, 63-75.
Wermers, R., 1997, “Momentum investment strategies of mutual funds, performance, and survivorship bias,” Working paper, University of Colorado.
Wermers, R., 2000,” Mutual fund performance: An empirical decomposition into stock-picking talent, style, transactions costs, and expenses,”Journal of Finance, 55, 1655-1695.
論文全文使用權限
校內
紙本論文於授權書繳交後1年公開
同意電子論文全文授權校園內公開
校內電子論文於授權書繳交後1年公開
校外
同意授權
校外電子論文於授權書繳交後1年公開

如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信