淡江大學覺生紀念圖書館 (TKU Library)
進階搜尋


下載電子全文限經由淡江IP使用) 
系統識別號 U0002-1606201521324700
中文論文名稱 兩岸產險公司使用再保險行為之比較
英文論文名稱 The Different Determinants of Reinsurance Usage Across Property-Liability Insurers in China and Taiwan
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中) 保險學系保險經營碩士班
系所名稱(英) Department of Insurance
學年度 103
學期 2
出版年 104
研究生中文姓名 黃梓銨
研究生英文姓名 Tzu-An Huang
電子信箱 andyhuang0818@hotmail.com
學號 602560319
學位類別 碩士
語文別 英文
口試日期 2015-05-25
論文頁數 50頁
口試委員 指導教授-田峻吉
委員-楊曉文
委員-黃漢青
中文關鍵字 再保險  保險財務  兩岸保險市場 
英文關鍵字 reinsurance  insurance finance  insurance market 
學科別分類
中文摘要 再保險為移轉保險風險與調節資本風險的工具,對於產險業經營非常重要。過去文獻探討影響再保險因素的時候,多局限在單一保險市場,很少對於兩個以上的保險市場做分析。本研究主要目的為比較兩岸產險公司使用再保險行為,樣本期間為 2008年至 2012 年,利用最小平方回歸模型分別探討再保險比例和資產規模、現金比率、財務槓桿、資產報酬率、成本比率、公司成立時間、公司國籍與是否為金控成員等八個自變數之間的關係。實證結果發現,對兩岸產險公司再保險比例皆有顯著影響的變數為現金比率、財務槓桿、資產報酬率及是否為金控成員等四個變數。對兩岸產險公司再保險使用不同的影響因素為非財務因素,影響台灣產險公司再保險使用為資產規模及公司成立時間;而中國產險公司成本比率及公司國籍對再保險比例有影響。造成兩岸再保險使用差異的原因,可能來自兩岸不同的保險經營環境與法律規範。
英文摘要 Most previous studies investigated the determinants of reinsurance for property-liability insurers only in one country, rather than compared the distinct determinants of reinsurance usage across insurers in two different countries. The main purpose of this paper was to investigate the different determinants of reinsurance across property-liability insurers in two developing countries. We use empirical data of two important developing insurance markets, Taiwan and China, to address this question.
To consistent with previous findings, our empirical results support that some financial ratios including cash, leverage, ROA and group membership have same impact on reinsurance usage for property-liability insurers in Taiwan and China. However, some non-financial factors such as size and age influence the determinants of reinsurance usage property-liability insurers in Taiwan, but not in China. Some factors such as cost and belonging to local insurers influence the determinants of reinsurance usage property-liability insurers in China, but not in Taiwan. To compare behavior of purchasing reinsurance in two countries, we find that property-liability insurers in Taiwan tend to purchase more reinsurance than China. The reasons could be attributed to the different insurance market environment and regulation between Taiwan and China.
To sum up, the variables relating financial ratios have same impact on reinsurance for property-liability insurers in Taiwan and China. However, we observed that non-financial factors have different impact on reinsurance usage for property-liability insurers in these two countries.
論文目次 Content
1. INTRODUCTION 1
2. INSURANCE ENVIRONMENT AND LITERATURE REVIEW 5
3. DATA RESOURCE, VARIABLE DEFINITIONS AND EMPIRICAL MODEL 15
3.1 DATA RESOURCE 15
3.2 VARIABLE DEFINITIONS 15
3.3 EMPIRICAL MODEL 22
4. EMPIRICAL RESULTS 24
4.1 SUMMARY STATISTICS 24
4.2 EMPIRICAL RESULTS 28
5. CONCLUSION 39
REFERENCE 42
APPENDIX 46


Figures of Content
FIGURE 1 THE PER CAPITA GDP IN TAIWAN AND CHINA 6

FIGURE 2 TOTAL ASSET OF THE PROPERTY-LIABILITY INSURANCE INDUSTRY IN TAIWAN AND CHINA 7

FIGURE 3 PREMIUM INCOME OF THE PROPERTY-LIABILITY INSURANCE INDUSTRY IN TAIWAN AND CHINA 7

FIGURE 4 INSURANCE DENSITY FOR PROPERTY-LIABILITY INSURERS IN TAIWAN AND CHINA 10

FIGURE 5 INSURANCE PENETRATION OF PROPERTY-LIABILITY INSURERS IN TAIWAN AND CHINA 10

FIGURE 6 ROA OF PROPERTY-LIABILITY INSURERS IN TAIWAN AND CHINA 11


Tables of Content
TABLE 1 VARIABLES AND DEFINITIONS 21

TABLE 2 SUMMARY STATISTICS IN TAIWAN 26

TABLE 3 SUMMARY STATISTICS IN CHINA 27

TABLE 4 REGRESSION EMPIRICAL RESULTS IN TAIWAN 33

TABLE 5 REGRESSION EMPIRICAL RESULTS IN CHINA 34

TABLE6 REGRESSION EMPIRICAL RESULTS IN TAIWAN AND CHINA 35

TABLE 7 COMPARE REGRESSION EMPIRICAL RESULTS WITH TAIWAN AND CHINA 36

TABLE 8 STEPWISE REGRESSION RESULTS IN TAIWAN 37

TABLE 9 STEPWISE REGRESSION RESULTS IN CHINA 38
參考文獻 1.Adams, M. (1996), “The Reinsurance Decision in Life Insurance Firms: An Empirical Test of the Risk-Bearing Hypothesis,” Accounting and Finance, 36(1): 15-30.
2.Adiel, R. (1996), “Reinsurance and the Management of Regulatory Ratios and Taxes in the Property-Casualty Insurance Industry,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 22(1-3): 207-240.
3.Carson, James M.; Hoyt, Robert E. (1995), “Life Insurer Financial Distress: Classification Models and Empirical Evidence,” Journal of Risk and Insurance, 62: 764-775.
4.Chen Renbao and Wong Kie Ann (2004), “The Determinants of Financial Health of Asian Insurance Companies,” Journal of Risk and Insurance, 71(3): 469-499.
5.Chen, Y., Hamwi, I.S. and Hudson, T. (2001), “The effect of ceded reinsurance on the solvency of primary insurers,” International Advances in Economic Research, 7 (1): 66-67.
6.Cole, C. R. and K. A. McCullough (2006), “A Reexamination of the Corporate Demand for Reinsurance,” The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 73(1): 169-192.
7.Cummins, J.D., Georges Dionne, Robert Gagne and Abdelhakim Nouira (2008), “The Costs and Benefits of Reinsurance,” New Forms of Risk Sharing and Financial Engineering, Working paper 08-01, Canada Research Chair in Risk Management, HEC Montréal.
8.Frank, M. Z., and Goyal, V. K. (2009), “Capital Structure Decisions: Which Factors Are Reliably Important?” Financial Management, 38(1): 1-37.
9.Garneiro, L.A. and Sherris, M. (2009), “Demand for reinsurance: Evidence from Australian insurers,” China–USA Business Review, 8(10): 1–21.
10.Garven, J. R. and Lamm-Tennant, J. (2003), “The Demand for Reinsurance: Theory and Empirical Tests,” Assurance, 71(3): 217-238.
11.Hoerger, T. J., Sloan, F. A. and Hassan, M. (1990), “Loss Volatility, Bankruptcy, and the Demand for Reinsurance,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 3(3): 221-245.
12.Jensen, M. C. (1986), “Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers,” American Economic Review, 79(2): 323-329.
13.Lee, Hsu-Hua and Lee, Chen-Ying (2012), “An Analysis of Reinsurance and Firm Performance: Evidence from the Taiwan Property-Liability Insurance Industry,” The Geneva Paper, 37: 467-484.
14.Lewis, C. M. and Murdock, K. C. (1996), “The Role of Government Contract in Discretionary Reinsurance Markets for natural Disasters,” Journal of Risk and insurance, 63(4): 567-597.
15.Mayers,D. and Smith, C.W. (1990), “On the Corporate Demand for Insurance: Evidence from Reinsurance Market,” Journal of Business,63(1): 19-40.
16.Opler, T., Pinkowitz, L., Stulz, R. and Williamson, R. (1999), “The determinants and implications of corporate cash holdings,” Journal of Financial Economics, 52: 3-46.
17.Plantin, G. (2006), “Does Reinsurance Need Reinsurers?” Journal of Risk and Insurance, 73(1): 153-168.
18.Powell, L. S. and Sommer, D.W. (2007), “Internal Versus External Capital Markets in the Insurance Industry: The Role of Reinsurance,” Journal of Financial Service Research, 31(2-3): 173-188.
19.Shortridge, R.T. and Avila, S.M. (2004), “The Impact of Institutional Ownership on the Reinsurance Decision,” Risk Management and Insurance Review, 7(2): 93-106.
20.Shiu Yung-Ming (2011),“ Reinsurance and Capital Structure: Evidence from the United Kingdom Non-Life Insurance Industry,” Journal of Risk and Insurance,78(2): 475-494.
21.Tien, J. and Yang, S. (2012), “The Determinants of Life Insurer’s Growth for a Developing Insurance Market: Domestic vs Foreign Insurance Firms,” The Geneva Paper, 39: 1-24.
22.Wang, J. L., Chang, V. Y., Lai, G. C. and Tzeng, L.Y. (2008), “Demutualization and Demand for Reinsurance,” Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance-Issues and Practice, 33: 566-584.
論文使用權限
  • 同意紙本無償授權給館內讀者為學術之目的重製使用,於2018-06-18公開。
  • 同意授權瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2018-06-18起公開。


  • 若您有任何疑問,請與我們聯絡!
    圖書館: 請來電 (02)2621-5656 轉 2486 或 來信