淡江大學覺生紀念圖書館 (TKU Library)
進階搜尋


下載電子全文限經由淡江IP使用) 
系統識別號 U0002-1606201114442100
中文論文名稱 衍生性金融商品資訊內涵之檢測--兼論第34號財務會計準則公報之效果
英文論文名稱 Earnings Persistence and Valuation Implication for Listed Firms with Financial Derivatives Usage under SFAS No.34
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中) 會計學系碩士班
系所名稱(英) Department of Accounting
學年度 99
學期 2
出版年 100
研究生中文姓名 龔文彬
研究生英文姓名 Wen-Pin Kung
電子信箱 nix8686@hotmail.com
學號 697600202
學位類別 碩士
語文別 中文
口試日期 2011-05-27
論文頁數 41頁
口試委員 指導教授-張寶光
指導教授-陳慶隆
委員-黃台心
委員-陳心田
委員-傅鍾仁
中文關鍵字 衍生性金融商品  盈餘反應係數  Mishkin 
英文關鍵字 Financial Derivatives  Earnings Response Coefficients  Mishkin 
學科別分類 學科別社會科學商學
中文摘要 本研究檢視衍生性金融商品的使用程度,是否因第34號公報的實施,而顯著影響公司的盈餘與股價報酬之間的關係。其次,分析在第34號公報實施之後,資本市場投資者是否更理性反應公司應用衍生性金融商品的使用程度。本文以我國2004至2008年上市公司之一般產業為研究對象,剔除金融保險業及資料不齊全之公司後進行實證。首先,採用複迴歸檢測第34號公報適用前後盈餘與股價報酬關聯性,進而採取Mishkin (1983) 理性預期模型,探討34號公報後,市場對公司應用衍生性金融商品是否有過度反應或反應不足之現象。實證結果發現,採用第34公報後將顯著提高公司財務報表的透明度,進一步提高衍生性金融商品的使用程度對提高盈餘與股價報酬關聯性;市場理性預期的測試部份,實證發現,雖然第34號公報的公佈實施有助於提高財務報表的透明度,投資者解讀公司衍生性金融商品之使用與盈餘持續性的關係時,皆能理性反應,並未受到第34號公報實施的影響。
英文摘要 This research examines the possible impact on firms’ earnings and stock return after implementing SFAS No.34 which directly imposes effect on financial derivatives usage. Furthermore, this research also analyzes post SFAS No.34’s effect on market investors’ rational response of financial derivatives usage. This research adopts empirical analyzing method and studis Taiwan listed firms for year 2004 to 2008, and meanwhile, excludes financial firms and firms with missing data. In order to analyze the alteration in relationship between earnings and stock returns, this study examines both pre adoption and post adoption period of SFAS No.34 using multiple regressions. Moreover, by using the Mishkin’s rational expectation model (1983), this study discusses if market has overreacted or underreacted to firms’ application of financial derivatives. Empirical results indicate that implementing SFAS No.34 will significantly enhance corporate financial statement transparency as well as improve financial derivatives usage to enhance the relationship between firms’ earnings and stock returns. On the other hand, the test of market rational expectations suggests that although SFAS No.34 helps to enhance corporate financial statement transparency, however, market investors’ rational on interpreting corporate financial derivatives usage and earnings persistency relationship remains. Therefore, interpretation ability has not been affected by adopting SFAS No.34.
論文目次 目錄
第壹章 緒論1
第一節 研究背景與動機1
第二節 研究目的4
第三節 論文架構4
第四節 研究流程6
第貳章 文獻探討與研究假說7
第一節 我國對金融商品會計處理準則之介紹7
第二節 國內外與金融商品相關之文獻13
第三節 公司使用衍生性金融商品之目的19
第四節 研究假說20
第參章 研究方法22
第一節 實證模型與變數定義22
第二節 研究期間、樣本選取與資料來源25
第肆章 實證結果與分析26
第一節 敘述性統計及相關分析26
第二節 假說一迴歸分析27
第三節 假說二MISHKIN檢定結果28
第四節 敏感性測試 32
第伍章 研究結論與限制35
第一節 結論35
第二節 限制35
參考文獻36
中文文獻36
英文文獻38

圖目錄
圖1 研究流程圖6
圖2 34號公報內容之規範架構 11

表目錄
表2-1 金融商品續後評價一覽表7
表2-2 34號公報實施前後處理方法之差異比較12
表2-3 衍生性金融商品之歸類彙總12
表2-4 34號公報所規定之三種避險型態彙整13
表4-1 敘述性統計26
表4-2 相關係數分析27
表4-3 假說一-迴歸分析結果28
表4-4 假說二-NONLINEAR GLS ESTIMATION OF EARNINGS31
表4-5 敏感性測試-NONLINEAR GLS ESTIMATION OF EARNINGS34

參考文獻 中文文獻
王萬成、高祥恒,2005,裁決性應計項目、衍生性金融商品與損益平穩化,中華會計學刊,第5卷第2期:143-168。
王蘭芬、薛敏正、顏莉萍,2009,銀行業衍生性金融商品與裁決性壞帳之關聯性研究,當代會計,第10卷第1期:1-28。
林有志、曾乾豪,2007,財務透明度對盈餘資訊性之影響,當代會計,第8卷第2期:155-180。
林美花、黃祥宇,2006,衍生性金融商品數量性資訊揭露與外匯風險暴露之關聯性研究,會計評論,第43期:63-93。
林維珩、盧鎮瑋,2005,股價對強制性財務預測反應之效率性研究,會計評論,第41期:53-75。
邱正仁、高蘭芬、盧素貞,2003,從財務報表揭露探討我國金融機構衍生性金融商品之操作,中華管理評論,第6卷第2期:94-117。
金佑儒,2008,適用34號公報金融商品的使用與盈餘管理決策之關係,私立輔仁大學會計系未出版碩士論文。
柯瓊鳳,2003,信用衍生性金融商品暨其主要會計準則之探討,台灣金融財務季刊,第4卷第3期:41-55。
張紹基、黃薏萍,2001,衍生性金融商品在公司風險管理上的使用情形:台灣與其他國家之比較,中山管理評論,第9卷第3期:471-496。
戚務君、蔡彥卿、曾郁芬 ,2002,我國銀行業金融商品公平價值與風險資訊附註揭露之價值攸關性研究,證券市場發展季刊,第14卷第3期: 74-112。
陳欣怡,2005年3月,金融商品會計處理準則及未來修訂方向,會計研究月刊,232期:62-67。
陳雅雯,2006,台灣電子業操作衍生性商品避險與公司特質之關連性及公佈34號公報之影響,國立交通大學經營管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
楊聲勇、董澍琦、郭憲章、徐偉軒 ,2009,外匯衍生性商品使用與企業匯率風險暴露:以台灣企業爲例,臺大管理論叢,第20卷第1期:157-188。
劉志諒、賴淑妙,2009,衍生性金融商品之使用對盈餘屬性及盈餘資訊性之影響,管理評論,第28卷第2期:77-100。
謝淑旦、何孟芳,2010,第34號公報與金融危機對企業使用衍生性金融商品之實證研究,商業現代化學刊,第5卷第3期:97-115。

英文文獻
Adam, T. R., and C. S. Fernando. 2006. Hedging, speculation, and shareholder value. Journal of Financial Economics 81: 283-309.
Ahemd A.S., E. Kilic, and G.J. Lobo.2006. Does recognition versus disclosure matter? Evidence from value-relevance of banks’ recognized and disclosed derivative financial instruments. The Accounting Review 81: 567-588.
Barnea, A., J. Ronen, and S. Sadan. 1975. The implementation of accounting objectives: An application to extraordinary items. The Accounting Review 50 (January): 58-68.
Barton, S. 2001. Infant feeding practices of low-income rural mothers. MCN-The American Journal of Mutml Child Nursing 26: 93-97.
Barth, M.E., W.H. Beaver, and W.R, Landsman. 1998. Relative valuation roles of equity book value and net income as a function of financial health. Journal of Accounting& Economic 25: 1-34.
Brown, G. W., P. R. Crabb, and D. Haushalter. 2006. Are firms successful at selective hedging? The Journal of Business 79 (6): 2925-2949.
Brown, S. J., and J. B. Warner. 1980. Measuring security price performance. Journal of Financial Economics 8 (3): 205-258.
Brown, S. J., and J. B. Warner. 1985. Using daily stock returns: the case of event study. Journal of Financial Economics 14 (1): 3-31.
Duangploy and Helmi, 2003. SFAS No. 133: Effect on 25 Large Banks. Bank Accounting & Finance16: 7–13.
Easley, D., and M. O’Hara. 2004 . Information and the cost of capital. Journal of Finance 59 (4): 1553-1583.
Elgers, P., M. Lo and R. Pfeiffer. 2001. Delayed security price adjustments to financial analysts’ forecast of annual earnings. The Accounting Review 76(October): 613-632.
Faulkender, M. W. 2005. Hedging or market timing? Selecting the interest rate exposure of corporate debt. Journal of Finance 60: 931-962.
Finnerty, J., and D Grant . 2000. Alternative approaches to testing hedge effectiveness under SFAS No. 133. Accounting Horizons 16 (2): 95-108.
Fok, R., C. Carroll, and M. Chiou. 1997. Determinants of corporate hedging and derivatives:A revisit. Journal of Economics and Business 49 (6): 569-585.
Froot, K., D. Scharfstein, and J. Stein, 1993. Risk management: Coordinating corporate investment and financing policies. The Journal of Finance 48 (5): 1629-1658.
Gay, G. D. and Nam, J. 1998 .The underinvestment problem and corporate derivativesuse. Financial Management 27 (4): 53-69.
Geczy, C., B. A. Minton, and C. Schrand. 1997. Why firms use currency derivatives? Journal of Finance 52 (September): 1324-1354.
Geczy, C., B. A. Minton, and C. M. Schrand. 2007. Taking a view: Corporate speculation, governance, and compensation. Journal of Finance 62: 2405 -2443.
Guay, W. R. 1999. The impact of derivatives on firm risk: An empirical examination of new derivatives users. Journal of Accounting & Economics 26: 319-351.
Guay, W., and S.P. Kothari. 2003. How much do firms hedge with derivatives. Journal of Financial Economics 70: 423-461.
Graham, J. R., and D. A. Rogers. 2002. Do firms hedge in response to tax incentives? The Journal of Finance 57 (2): 815-839.
Hodder, L. D., P. E. Hopkins, and J. M. Wahlen. 2006. Risk-relevance of fair value income measures for commercial banks. The Accounting Review 81 (2): 337-375.
Hughes, P. J. 1986. Signaling by Direct Disclosure Under Asymmetric Information. Journal of Accounting and Economics.
Imhoff, E. 1989. Accounting quality: Economic content. Working Paper, University of Michigan.
Kamin, J. Y., and J. Ronen. 1978. The Smoothing of Income Numbers: Some Empirical Evidence on Systematic Differences among Management-Controlled and Owner-Controlled Firms. Accounting, Organizations and Society 3 (2): 141-157.
Kanagaretnam K., R. Mathieu and M. Shehata. July 2009 . Usefulness of Comprehensive Income Reporting in Canada:Evidence From Adoption of SFAS 130. J.Account. Public Policy 28 (4): 349-365. .
Melumad, N. D., G. Weyns, and A. Ziv. 1999.Comparing alternative hedge accounting standards: Shareholder’s perspective. Review of Accounting Studies 4: 265-292.
Mishkin, F. 1983. A rational expectations approach to macroeconometrics: Testing policy effectiveness and efficient market models .Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press for the National Bureau of Economics Research.
Nance, D. R., C. W. Smith, JR., and C. W. Smithson. 1993. On the determinants of corporate hedging. Journal of Finance 48 (September): 267-284.
Pincus, M., and S. Rajgopal. 2002. The Interaction between accrual management and hedging: Evidence from oil and gas Firms. The Accounting Review 77: 127-160.
Sapra, H. 2002. Do mandatory hedge disclosures discourage or encourage excessive speculation? Journal of Accounting Research 40: 933-964.
Sloan, R. 1996. Do stock prices fully reflect information in accruals and cash flows about future earnings? The Accounting Review 71 (July): 289-315.
Smith, C., and R. Stulz. 1985. The determinants of firms' hedging policies. Journal of Financial Quantitative Analysis 20: 391-405.
Stulz, R., 1996. Rethinking risk management. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 9: 8-24.
Thomas, J. K., and P. H. Zhang. 2002. Inventory changes and future returns. Review of Accounting Studies 7 (June): 163-187.
Tufano, P. 1996. Who manages risk? An empirical examination of risk management practices in the gold mining industry. Journal of Finance 51: 1097-1137.
Vafeas, N. 2000. Board structure and the informativeness of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 19 (2): 139-160.
Xie, H. 2001. The mispricing of abnormal accruals. The Accounting Review 76 (July): 357-373.
論文使用權限
  • 同意紙本無償授權給館內讀者為學術之目的重製使用,於2014-06-24公開。
  • 同意授權瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2014-06-24起公開。


  • 若您有任何疑問,請與我們聯絡!
    圖書館: 請來電 (02)2621-5656 轉 2281 或 來信