淡江大學覺生紀念圖書館 (TKU Library)
進階搜尋


下載電子全文限經由淡江IP使用) 
系統識別號 U0002-1606200516030300
中文論文名稱 影響品牌全球化、當地文化象徵因素之研究
英文論文名稱 The Study of the Influences on Brand Globalization and Brand Local Icon Value
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中) 國際貿易學系國際企業學碩士班
系所名稱(英) Department of International Trade
學年度 93
學期 2
出版年 94
研究生中文姓名 林良如
研究生英文姓名 Liang-Ru Lin
學號 692480063
學位類別 碩士
語文別 中文
口試日期 2005-05-19
論文頁數 71頁
口試委員 指導教授-曾義明
委員-林隆儀
委員-白滌清
中文關鍵字 全球化品牌  文化  民族優越感 
英文關鍵字 Brand Globalization  Culture  Ethnocentrism 
學科別分類 學科別社會科學商學
中文摘要 在今日擁擠的市場中,許多企業都希望透過品牌建立,來拉開和競爭者的距離。「品牌」,是顧客對產品或公司經驗的總和,每一次企業和顧客的互動,都在傳遞某項訊息,然而對顧客來說,並不是每個環節都同樣重要,企業需找出顧客最重視的接觸點,集中資源投資,才能達到建立品牌的強大效益。

只有創建了自己的品牌,才能讓企業的競爭力加強,只有保有自己的品牌,才能讓企業長久地佔有市場。創建品牌國際化,甚或是全球化,是一個全球經濟發展的必須趨勢,在新的經濟競爭中,全球化品牌英雄應該要把握住變化趨勢,用自己的力量贏得主動性,從而讓品牌在國際上佔有一席之地,長久為消費者提供優質產品或服務。

本文主要探討知覺品牌全球化與品牌做為當地象徵價值的要素。將要素分為國家印象要素、公司品牌建立要素與使用者/地方文化要素三構面,分別對知覺品牌作探討,同時加入民族優越感作為干擾變數進行分析,以瞭解知覺品牌與各要素間的關係。並將樣本分為全部品牌、本國品牌、國外品牌三種情況加以探討。研究結果顯示,在樣本不分群時,(1)來源國產品品質、來源國產品創新性、品牌形象、品牌熟悉度、品牌代言人、品牌知名度、 廣告標準化程度、使用者分佈、對知覺品牌全球化皆有正面影響。(2)來源國產品品質、品牌形象、品牌熟悉度、品牌代言人、使用者分佈、地方文化色彩對知覺品牌做為當地象徵價值皆有正面影響。(3)民族優越感對知覺品牌的影響只存在於部分要素中。

若以本國品牌與國外品牌作比較,研究結果顯示,對於兩樣本群而言(1)來源國產品品質、來源國產品創新性、品牌形象、使用者分佈,對知覺品牌全球化皆有正面影響。(2)來源國產品品質、品牌形象、品牌代言人、地方文化色彩對知覺品牌做為當地象徵價值皆有正面影響。(3)民族優越感對知覺品牌的影響只存在於部分要素中。
英文摘要 In the crowded market of today, many enterprises hope to increase the distance between competitors through the set up of brand. “Brand” is the summary of products or a company’s experiences that comsumers’ perceived. The interactive between enterprises and customer every time, has transmitted a kind of information, but for customers, not every link is equally important. Enterprises need to find out the contact that customers paid attention to most to click, concentrate resources on investment, that could reach the strong benefit of setting up a brand.

Only establish one's own brand could let the competitiveness of enterprises be strengthened. Only protect one's own brand could let enterprises occupy the market for a long time. To establish the internationalization of brands, even globalization, is a global trend in a global economic development. Among new economic competition, the globalization brand hero should get hold of the variation tendency, gain the initiative with one's own strength, thus let the brand occupy a significant position in the world and offer the quality product or the service to consumer for a long time.

This study probes into the key elements that perceived brand globalization and the brand local icon value. Those elements are the national impression, the set up of company's brand and the user / the local cultural. To discuss the brand percept separately, and join ethnocentrism as interfering parameters to analyze at the same time to find out the relation among perceived brand and every key element. We divide the sample into three groups: all brands, national brand and foreign brand. The results of the study show, when the sample does not hive off, we can find (1) Country-of-origin’s products quality, the innovation of products, brand image, brand familiarity, brand spokesman, advertising standardization, users’ distribution, all has positive influence on perceived brand globalization. (2) Country-of-origin’s products quality, brand image, brand familiarity, brand spokesman, users’ distribution, local culture all has positive influence on brand local icon values. (3) The consumer
ethnocentrism only exists in some key elements.

While comparing with foreign brand and the national brand, for two groups the result of study shows, (1) Country-of-origin’s products quality, the innovation of products, brand image, users’ distribution all has positive influence on perceived brand globalization. (2) Country-of-origin’s products quality, brand image, brand spokesman, local culture all have positive influence on brand local icon values.(3) The consumer ethnocentrism only exists in some key elements.
論文目次 目錄
目錄………………………………………………………………………Ι
表目錄……………………………………………………………………Π
第一章 緒論 …………………………………………………………1
第一節 研究背景與研究動機 …………………………………………1
第二節 研究目的 ………………………………………………………3
第三節 研究流程 ………………………………………………………4
第二章 文獻探討………………………………………………………6
第一節 文獻整理 ………………………………………………………6
第二節 研究架構 ………………………………………………………15
第三節 研究假說 ………………………………………………………16
第三章 研究設計………………………………………………………21
第一節 操作性定義 ……………………………………………………21
第二節 抽樣設計與樣本結構 …………………………………………28
第三節 資料分析方法 …………………………………………………30
第四章 資料分析 ………………………………………………………33
第一節 知覺品牌之影響 ………………………………………………34
第二節 民族優越感作為干擾變數對知覺品牌之影響 ………………40
第三節 分析結果彙整表 ………………………………………………48
第五章 結論與建議…………………………………………………… 51
第一節 研究結論 ………………………………………………………51
第二節 研究限制 ………………………………………………………54
第三節 研究建議 ………………………………………………………55
參考文獻 ………………………………………………………………57
附錄一 問卷 ……………………………………………………………61
附錄二 樣本平均數與標準差 …………………………………………71
圖表目錄
圖1-1 本文之研究流程圖 ………………………………………………5
圖2-1-1 暈輪效果模式…………………………………………………14
圖2-1-2 彙總效果模式…………………………………………………14
圖2-2 本研究觀念………………………………………………………15
表3-1 操作變數相關定義彙整表………………………………………25
表3-1(續)操作變數相關定義彙整表 ………………………………26
表3-1(續)操作變數相關定義彙整表 ………………………………27
表3-2 問卷樣本結構表…………………………………………………29
表3-3 信度分析表………………………………………………………30
表4-1 知覺品牌全球化之迴歸分析(全部)…………………………34
表4-2 品牌做為當地象徵價值之迴歸分析(全部)…………………36
表4-3 知覺品牌全球化之迴歸分析(台灣)…………………………36
表4-4 品牌做為當地象徵價值之迴歸分析(台灣)…………………37
表4-5 知覺品牌全球化之迴歸分析(國外)…………………………38
表4-6 品牌做為當地象徵價值之迴歸分析(國外)…………………38
表4-7 在考慮民族優越感下對知覺品牌全球化之迴歸分析(全部)41
表4-8 在考慮民族優越感下對品牌做為當地象徵價值之迴歸分析(全部) ……………………………………………………………………………42
表4-9 在考慮民族優越感下對知覺品牌全球化之迴歸分析(台灣)43
表4-10 在考慮民族優越感下對品牌做為當地象徵價值之迴歸分析(台灣)…………………………………………………………………44
表4-11 民族優越感下對知覺品牌全球化之迴歸分析(國外) ……46
表4-12 在考慮民族優越感下對品牌做為當地象徵價值之迴歸分析(國外)…………………………………………………………………47
表 4-13 全部樣本假說分析結果彙整表………………………………48
表 4-14 國內樣本假說分析結果彙整表………………………………49
表 4-15 國外樣本假說分析結果彙整表………………………………50
參考文獻 一、中文部份
于卓民、巫立宇、吳習文、周莉萍、龐旭斌(2001),國際行銷學,智勝出版社。
于卓民編譯 (2002),國際企業管理導向,智勝出版社。
艾克等;高登等譯;洪順慶導讀(2001),品牌管理,天下遠見出版公司。
周文賢( 2003),多變量統計分析SAS/STAT使用方法,智勝出版社 。
薛可(1999),文化:名牌之根,武漢大學出版社。
黃俊英(2000),行銷管理-策略性的觀點,華泰文化事業出版。

二、英文部份︰
Aaker, D. A. (1991), “Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name,” The Free Press, N.Y.
Aaker, D. A. and K. L. Keller (1990), “Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extensions,” Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 27-41.
Alden, D. L., J-B EM Steenkamp, and R. Batra (1999), “Brand Positioning Through Advertising in Asia, North America, and Europe: the role of global consumer culture,” Journal of Marketing, 63(1), 75-87.
Batra, R., V. Ramaswamy, D.L. Alden, J-B EM Steenkamp, and S. Ramachander (2000), “Effects of Brand Local/Nonlocal Origin on Consumer Attitudes in Developing Countries,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 9, 83-95.
Baughn, C.C. and A.Yaprak (1996), “Economic Nationalism: Conceptual and Empirical Development,” Political Psychology, 17(4), 759-778.
Bower, Amanda B. and S. Landreth, (2001), “ Is Beauty Best? Highs Versus Normally Attractive Models in Advertising,” Journal of Advertising, 1-12.
Chao, P. (1993), “Partitioning Country of Origin Effects: Consumer Evaluations of a Hybrid Product,” Journal of International Business Studies, Second Quarter, 291-306.
De Mooij, M. (1994), Advertising Worldwide, 2nd edition, Prentice Hall, N.Y.
De Mooij, M. (1998), Global Marketing and Advertising, Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA.
Dewar D. R. and E. Dutton Jane (1988), “The Adoption of Radical and Incremental Innovations: An Empirical Analysis,” Management Science, 32, (11), 1422.
Doyle, P. (1990), “Building Successful Brands,” The Journal of Consumer Marketing, 7(2), 5.
Durgee, Jeffrey F., Robert W. Stuart (1987), “Advertising Symbols and Brand Names That Best Represent Key Product Meanings,” The Journal of Consumer Marketing, 4(3), 15-25.
Duncan, T., and J. Ramaprasad (1995), “Standardized Multinational Advertising: The Influencing factors,” Journal of Advertising, 24(3), 55.
Ger, G. (1997), “Localizing in The Global Village: Local Firms Competing in Global Markets,” California Management Review, 41, 64-83.
Goldsmith, Ronald E., Barbara A. Laffery, and Stephen J. Newell (2000), “The Impact of Corporate Credibility and Celebrity Credibility on Consumer Reaction to Advertisements and Brands,” Journal of Advertising, 29(3), 43-54.
Han, C. M. and V. Tepstra (1988), “Country of Origin Effects for Uni-national and Bi-national Products,” Journal of International Business Studies, 135-156.
Hassan, S.S. and L. P. Katsanis (1994), “Global Market Segmentation Strategies and Trends,” In S.S. Hassan, and E. Kaynak (eds.) Globalization of Consumer Markets: Structures and Strategies, International Business Press: N. Y., 47-62.
Heslop L.A., Wall, Marjorie, J. Liefeld (1993), “Impact of Country-of-Origin on Consumer Judgments in Multi-Cus Situations : A Covariance Analysis,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,Vol.19(2),105-133.
Hofstede, G. (1993), “Cultural Constrains in Management Theories,” Academy of Management Executive, 7(1), 14-95.
Jain, Subhash C. (1989), “Standardization of International Marketing Strategy: Some R,” Journal of Marketing, 53(1), 70.
John Clerk. and K.Guy (1998), “Innovation and Competitiveness: A Review,” Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 10(3), 363.
Kamins, M. A. and L. J. Marks, (1991), “The Perception of Kosher as a Third Party Certification Claim in Advertising for Familiar and Unfamiliar Brands,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 19(3), 177-185.
Kapferer, J-N. (1997), Strategic Brand Management, 2nd edn, Kogan Page.
Keller, K. L. (1993), “Conceptualizing, Measuring and Managing Customer -Based Brand Equity,” Journal of Marketing, 51(1), 1-22.
Keller, K.L. (1998), “Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity, Prentice-Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Kotler, P. (2000), Marketing Management: Analysis Planning and Control, Prentice Hall, London.
Laroche, M, C. Kim, and L. Zhou (1996), “Brand Familiarity and Confidence as Determinants of Purchase Intention: An Empirical Test in a multiple Brand Context,” Journal of Business Research, 37(2), 115-120.
Levitt, T. (1983), “The Globalization of Markets”, Harvard Business Review, May-June, 92-102.
Li, Zhan G. and Rajiv P. Dant (1997), “Dimension of Prodict Quality and Country-of-Origin Effects Research,” Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 10.
Mathur, Lynette K., I. Mathur, and N. Rangan (1997), “The Wealth Effects Associated with a Celebrity Endorses: the Michael Jordan Phenomenon,” Journal of Advertising Research, May-Jane, 67-73.
Nebenzahl, I., E. D. Jeffe, and S.I. Lampert (1997), “Toward a Theory of Country Image Effect on Product Evaluation,” Management International Review, 37, 27-49.
Neff, J. (1999), “P&G and Unilever’s Giant Headaches,” Advertising Age 70 : 22-28.
Ohanian, R. (1991), “The Imapct of Celebrity Spokespersons’ Perceived Image on Consumers’ Intention to Purchase,” Journal of Advertising Research, 3(1), 46.
Oliver, R. L. and W. O. Bearden (1985), “Crossover Effects in the Theory of Reasoned Action: a Moderating Influence Attempt,” Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 324-340.
Peterson, Robert A. and J. P. Jolibert Alain (1995), “A Meta-Analysis of Country-of-Origin Effects,” Journal of International Business Studied, 26(4), 883-900.
Phau, I. and G. Prendegast (2000), “Conceptualizing the Country of Origin of Brand,” Journal of Marketing Communication, 159-170.
Pitcher, G. (1999), “Consumaer brands cull makes room to grow,” Marketing Week, 22 (40), 23.
Rochford and Linda (1991), “Generating and Screening New Product Ideas”, Industrial Marketing Management, 20(4), 287-297.
Rogers, B. (1992), Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Samli, C. A. (1995), International Consumer Behavior: Its Impact on Marketing Strategy Development, Quorum Books: Westport, CT.
Samiee, S. (1994), “Customer Evaluation of Products in a Global Market,” Journal of International Business Studies, 25(3), 579-604.
Samiee, S., I. Jeing, J. H. Pae and S. Tai (2003), “Advertising Standardization in Multinational Corporations: The Subsidiary Perspective,” Journal of Business Research, N.Y., 56(8), 613.
Shimp, T. A. and S. Sharma (1987), “Consumer Ethnocentrism: Construction and Validation of the CETSCALE,” Journal of Marketing Research, 24(3), 280-289.
Shocker, A. D., R.K. Srivastava, and R.W. Ruekert (1994), “Challenges and Opportunities Facing Brand Management: An Introduction to The Special Issue,” Journal of Marketing Research, 31(2), 149-158.
Steenkamp, J-B EM, R. Batra and D.L Alden, (2003), “How Perceived Brand Globalness Creates Brand Value,” Journal of International Business Studies, 34(1), 53-65.
Thakor, M.V. and L. P. Katsanis (1997), “ A Model of Brand Country Effects on Quality Dimensions: Issues and Implications,” Journal of Comsumer Markrting, 9 (3), 79-100.
Usunier J-C. (1993), “ International Marketing: A Cultural Approach. Hemel Hempstead,” UK: Prentice Hall.
Verlegh, Peeter W.J. and J-B E.M. Steenkamp (1999), “A Review and Meta-Analysis of Country-of-Origin Research,” Journal of Economic Psychology, 20(5), 521-546.
W. Fred van Raaij(1997), “ Globalisation of Marketing Communucation?,” Journal of Economic Psychology ,18 , 259-270.
Walker, C. (1996), “Can TV Save The Planet? American Demographics, 18 (May), 42-49.
Yoo, B., N. Donthu & S. Lee (2000), “An Examination of Selected Marketing Mix Elements and Brand Equity,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2), 195-211.
Yip, G. S. (1995), Total Global Strategy: Managing for Worldwide Competitive Advantage, Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Zaltman, G., R. Duncan & J. Holbek (1973), Innovations and Organizations, John Wiley & Sons, N.Y.
Zambuni, R. (1993), “Developing brands across borders”, Journal of Brand Management, 1 (1): 22-29.

論文使用權限
  • 同意紙本無償授權給館內讀者為學術之目的重製使用,於2010-06-23公開。
  • 同意授權瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2010-06-23起公開。


  • 若您有任何疑問,請與我們聯絡!
    圖書館: 請來電 (02)2621-5656 轉 2281 或 來信