淡江大學覺生紀念圖書館 (TKU Library)
進階搜尋


下載電子全文限經由淡江IP使用) 
系統識別號 U0002-1602201111564500
中文論文名稱 歐系奢華品牌購買行為---從自我建構觀點探討
英文論文名稱 Applying the Theory of Self-Construct to Investigate the Purchase Intention towards European Luxury Goods
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中) 歐洲研究所碩士班
系所名稱(英) Graduate Institute of European Studies
學年度 99
學期 1
出版年 100
研究生中文姓名 黃昱棠
研究生英文姓名 Yu-Tang Huang
學號 696290088
學位類別 碩士
語文別 中文
口試日期 2011-01-17
論文頁數 90頁
口試委員 指導教授-李月華
委員-曾義明
委員-張巧真
中文關鍵字 物質傾向  品牌連結  知覺價值  社會影響  自我建構  計畫性行為 
英文關鍵字 Materialism  Brand Connection  Perception Value  Social Influence  Self-Construct  Planned Behavior 
學科別分類 學科別社會科學區域研究
中文摘要 近年來,亞洲地區消費者對於歐系奢華品牌趨之若鶩的現象背後,探討消費者的購買動機為何。架構的部份,以計畫性行為理論為參考基礎,主要的三種影響因素,分別為物質傾向與自我品牌連結以及消費者對於奢華品牌的知覺價值、消費者受到社會影響的程度,並進一步針探討消費者進行奢華品牌購買時中自我建構的影響(可細分為獨立我、互依我),而不同類型的消費者會因外在或內在因素產生不同的購買決策。

在研究方法的部份,主要是以Amos結構方程模型(SEM)進行資料分析,透過消費者對於不同因素是否有顯著的影響,並進行分群比較分析。樣本是以有固定收入的上班族為主要受測對象,共計有效樣本數322位。研究證實當消費者在進行選擇時,物質傾向與自我品牌連結以及品牌知覺價值、社會傾向或個人傾向會影響消費者的決策,同時驗證了之前學者的研究,依據研究結果顯示,可將自我建構分為三種類型;獨立我型、互依我型以及原始我型消費者,不同類型的消費者會受到不同的影響因素,因而產生不同的消費行為與意願。
英文摘要 According to these years, in Asia, more and more consumers are interested in European luxury goods, so we want to find out the motivation behind the consumers why they want to buy the luxury goods. In the construct, we use Theory of Planned Behavior as a reference base and separate the motivation into three parts, materialism and self-brand connection 、the perception value of luxury-brands and social influence. In this research, we discuss about how these factors affect the consumer choice and the relationship between these factors. Besides, we also investigate self-construal which could separate into two parts: independent-self、dependent-self. The results show that different types of consumers due to external or internal factors make different purchasing decision.

In the research method, we use the structure equation modeling (SEM) to research the effect of the variables and make multiple team comparison. In total, there are 322 samples in research. We choose samples are people who have salary.The results show that consumers are attracted by materialism and self-brand connection 、the perception value of luxury-brands and social influence. At the same time, we also verify the research from before scholars. According to the final reseach we could separate self-construal into three groups. Therefore, we get three kinds of consumer such as independent-self、dependent-self and original self. Different kinds of consumer would affect by multi-factors then make various decisions and have diversiform behaviors.
論文目次 目錄
目錄………………………………………………………………………1
表目錄……………………………………………………………………3
圖目錄……………………………………………………………………4
第一章 緒論……………………………………………………………5
第一節 研究背景與動機………………………………………………5
第二節 研究目的………………………………………………………9
第三節 研究流程………………………………………………………10

第二章 文獻探討………………………………………………………11
第一節 計畫性行為理論………………………………………………11
第二節 物質傾向………………………………………………………14
第三節 自我品牌連結…………………………………………………17
第四節 社會影響………………………………………………………19
第五節 自我建構………………………………………………………21
第六節 品牌知覺價值…………………………………………………23

第三章 研究方法………………………………………………………33
第一節 研究架構………………………………………………………33
第二節 研究假說………………………………………………………34
第三節 研究對象與方法………………………………………………39
第四節 前測……………………………………………………………42
第五節 正式問卷設計…………………………………………………47
第四章 資料分析………………………………………………………53
第一節 樣本基本資料分析……………………………………………53
第二節 探索性因素分析………………………………………………55
第三節 驗證性因素分析………………………………………………58
第四節 路徑分析………………………………………………………61

第五章 結果論與建議…………………………………………………71
第一節 研究結論與貢獻………………………………………………71
第二節 管理意涵與實務建議…………………………………………73
第三節 研究限制………………………………………………………75
第四節 後續研究………………………………………………………76

參考文獻…………………………………………………………………78

附錄 問卷………………………………………………………………83

表目錄
表2-1 追求威望性消費者之分類………………………………………………….27
表3-1 女性各品牌知名度、炫耀性、獨特性、享樂性以及自我延伸之平均數與標
準差…………………………………………………………………….…….42
表3-2 男性各品牌知名度、炫耀性、獨特性、享樂性以及自我延伸之平均數與標
準差………………………………………………………………….……….44
表3-3 自我品牌連結量表…………………………………………………………..47
表3-4 物質傾向量表………………………………………………………………48
表3-5 獨立我與互依我量表…………………………………………………...……49
表3-6 品牌知覺價值的量表…………………………………………………...……50
表3-7 社會影響量表…………………………………………………...……………51
表3-8 奢華品牌購買意願量表……………………………………………………...52
表4-1 樣本的描述性統計……………………………………………………….….54
表4-2 探索性因素分析…………………………………………………………...…55
表4-3 衡量模式模型適配度……………………………………………………...…58
表4-4 收斂效度………………………………………………….............................59
表4-5 結構模式模型適配度…………………………………….............................61
表4-6 路徑係數………………………………..........................................................63
表4-7 自我建構集群分析……………………………..............................................62
表4-8 自我建構集群分析之最後集群中心點與ANOVA 分析...............................64
表4-9 整體模式與各類型樣本路徑係數表..............................................................65
表4-10 假說檢驗........................................................................................................69

圖目錄
圖1-1 研究流程圖…………………………………………………………………..10
圖2-1 TRA 模式架構圖………………………………………………………….…..12
圖2-2 TPB 模式架構圖………………………………………………………….…..12
圖2-3 介於方案評估與方案決策間的各項步驟圖…………………………………22
圖2-4 對於奢華產品消費的社會影響圖……………………………………………31
圖2-5 對於奢華產品消費的個人影響圖……………………………………………31
圖3-1 研究架構……………………………………………………………...……….33
圖3-2 研究架構與假說……………………………………………………………..34
圖4-1 結構模式……………………………………………………………………..62
圖4-2 原始我型……………………………………………………………………..66
圖4-3 互依我型……………………………………………………………………..66
圖4-4 獨立我型……………………………………………………………………..67
圖 5-1 動態的自我概念圖…………………………………………………….……73
圖5-2 消費者情境與參考群體影響…………………………………………….…..74
參考文獻 參考文獻

一、 中文部份

1. 史密斯(Eliot R. Smith),麥基(Diane Mackie)著 ; 莊耀嘉, 王重鳴譯,社會心理學,台北:桂冠圖書公司,2001
2. 石慧靈 (2005)。品牌魔咒 打造奢華品牌的Branding工程。臺北市: 高談文化事業公司。
3. 吳明隆 (2009)。結構方程模式AMOS操作與運用。五南文化。
4. 吳萬益 (2002)。企業研究方法。華泰文化。
5. 長澤伸也著,劉錦秀、鄭雅云譯(2004)。LV 時尚王國:全球第一名牌的購併與行銷之秘。台北市:商周出版,城邦文化發行。
6. 禹靜(Elena Yu) (民94)。絕對奢華百年品牌:GUCCI。臺北市:維德文化。
7. 茱迪•黎凡(Judith Levine)著; 鍾清瑜譯,可不可以一年都不買?—365天零購物生活日記,台北:先覺出版社,2007
8. 張威龍(2001)。虛榮特性、物質傾向與強迫性購買關係之研究。國立台北大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
9. 張春興。現代心理學,民國80年4月,初版,東華書局。
10. 張偉雄與王暢 (2008)。組織與管理研究的實證方法。華泰文化。
11. 陳智凱 (2010),消費是一種翻譯。台北市:博雅書屋。
12. 陸洛 (2005),“個人取向與社會取向的自我觀:概念、測量、及其適應功能”行政院國家科學委員會補助專題研究計畫華人本土心理學研究追求卓越延續計畫─子計畫四,民國93年04月01日至94年03月31日。

二、 英文部分

1. American Psychiatric Association (1987), Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder, Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
2. Aric Rindfleisch, James E. Burroughs & Nancy Wong (2009), “The Safety of Objects: materialism, Existential Insecurity, and Brand Connection” , Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.36 (June)
3. Bloch, P. and M. Richins (1992),“You Look 'Mahvelous': The pursuit of Beauty and the Marketing Concept”, Psychology and Marketing, Vol.9 (January), pp3-15.
4. Blair Kidwell, David M. Hardesty & Terry L. Childers (2007), “Consumer Emotional Intelligence: Conceptualization, Measurement, and the Prediction of Consumer Decision Making” , Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.35(June)
5. David Glen Mick(1996),”Are Studies of Dark Side Variables Confounded by Socially Desirable Responding? The Case of Materialism”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.23 (September)
6. Dubois, Bernard and Gilles Laurent(1994),“Attitudes toward the concept of luxury: An Exploratory Analysis,” Asia-Pacific Advances in Consumer Research, Siew Meng Leong and Joseph A. Cote, Singapore,1(2), 273-278
7. Eagly, A. & Chaiken, S. (1993),“ The psychology of attitude.” New York:Harcourt Brace Jovanovich
8. Gudyjunst,W.B. & Lee, C.M. (2003),“Assessing the validity of self-construal scales.”Human Communication Research, 29.2, pp.253-274.
9. Hofstede,G.(1980),Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
10. Hirschman, Elizabeth and Morris Holbrook (1982), “Hedonic consumption:emerging concepts, methods, and prepositions,” Journal of Marketing, 46,Summer, pp.92-101.
11. Joel Huber, Morris B. Holbrook, & Barbara Kahn (1986), “Effects of Competitive Context and of Additional Information on Price Sensitivity”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.23 (August), pp.250-60
12. Jennifer Edson Escalas & James R. Bettman (2003), “You Are They Eat: The Influence of Reference Groups on Consumers’ Connections to Brands ” ,Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol.13, 339-348
13. Keith Wilcox, Hyeong Min Kim, & Sankar Sen (2009), “Why Do Consumers Buy Counterfeit Luxury Brands?”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.16 (April), pp.247-259
14. Kelly L. Haws and Cait Poynor (2008), “Seize the Day! Encouraging Indulgence for the Hyperopic Consumer” ,Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.35 (December)
15. Lu, L., & Gilmour, R. (2004). Culture, self and ways to achieve SWB: A cross-cultural analysis. Journal of Psychology in Chinese Societies, 5, 51-79.
16. Lu, L., Gilmour, R., Kao, S. F., Wong, T. H., Hu, C. H., Chern, J. G., Huang, S. W.,& Shih, J. B. (2001). Two ways to achieve happiness: When the East meets the West. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 1161-1174
17. Lester W. Johnson (2004), “Measuring Perceptions of Brand Luxury”, Brand Management, Vol.11 (July), pp484-506
18. Leilei Gao, S. Christian Wheeler & Baba Shiv (2009), “The “Shaken Self”: Product Choices as a Means of Restoring Self-View Confidence” ,Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.36 (June)
14. Marsha L. Richins (1994), “Special Possessions and the Expression of Material Values”, Journal of consumer Research, Vol.21 (December)
15. Margaret C. Campbell, Amna Kirmani (2000), “Consumers’Use of persuasion Knowledge: The Effects of Accessibility and Cognitive Capacity on perception of an Influence Agent”, Journal of consumer Research, Vol.27 (June)
16. Micheael J. Barone & Tirthankar Roy (2010), “Does Exclusivity Always Pay Off? Exclusive Price Promotions and Consumer Response”, Journal of Marketing, Vol.74 (March)
17. Naomi Mandel and Dirk Smeesters (2008), “The Sweet Escape: Effects of Mortality Salience on Consumption Quantities for High and Low Self-Esteem Consumers” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.35 (August)
18. Roux, Elyette(1994),“Le Luxe: Entre Prestige et Marche de Masse,” Decisions Marketing, 1 (January-April), 15-22.
19. Roux, Elyette(1995),“Consumer evaluation of luxury brand extensions,” EMAC Conference, May, ESSEC, Paris.
20. Roux, Elyette & Jean-Marie Floch (1996),“Gerer L’Ingerable: La contradictioninterne de toute maison de luxe,”Decisions Marketing, 9(September-December),15-23.
21. Russell W. Belk (1983), “Worldly Possessions: Issues and Criticisms”, in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 10, ed. Richard P. Bagozzi and Alice M. Tybout, Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, pp514-519.
22. Russell W. Belk (1984),“Three Scales to Measure Constructs Related to Materialism: Reliability, Validity, and Relationships to Measures of Happiness,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 11, ed. Thomas Kinnear, Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, pp291-297
23. Russell W. Belk (1985), “Materialism: Trait Aspects of Living in the Material World”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.12 (December), pp265-280
24. Russell W. Belk (1988), “Possessions and the extended self”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 15, pp139-168
25. Richard G. Netemeyer, Scot Burton & Donald R. Lichtenstein (1995), “Trait Aspects of Vanity: Measurement and Relevance to Consumer Behavior”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.21 (March)
26. Susan Fournier(1998), “Consumers and Their Brand: Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.24 (March)
27. Vigneron, F. & Johnson,L.W.(1999),“ A review and a conceptual framework ofprestige-seeking consumer behavior.” Journal of Marketing Science Review
28. Vigneron, F. & Johnson,L.W.(2004),“Measuring perceptions of brand luxury.”Journal of Brand Management; Jul 2004;11.6
29. Valentyna Melnyk, Stijn M.J. Van Osselaer, & Tammo H.A. Bijmolt (2009), “Are Women More Loyal Customers Than Men? Gender Differences in Loyalty to Firms and Individual Service Providers”, Journal of Marketing, Vol.73 (July), pp82-96
30. William B. Dodds, Kent B. Monroe, & Dhruv Grewal (1991), “Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers’ Product Evaluations”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.27 (August), pp307-19
論文使用權限
  • 同意紙本無償授權給館內讀者為學術之目的重製使用,於2012-02-21公開。
  • 同意授權瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2012-02-21起公開。


  • 若您有任何疑問,請與我們聯絡!
    圖書館: 請來電 (02)2621-5656 轉 2281 或 來信