§ 瀏覽學位論文書目資料
  
系統識別號 U0002-1508201414022800
DOI 10.6846/TKU.2014.00523
論文名稱(中文) 改良式廣泛閱讀運用於以英語為外國語之科技大學學生—檢視其學習態度、閱讀習慣及閱讀能力表現
論文名稱(英文) Applying Modified Extensive Reading to College-Level EFL Students: A Study on Attitudes, Reading Habits, and Reading Performances
第三語言論文名稱
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中文) 英文學系博士班
系所名稱(英文) Department of English
外國學位學校名稱
外國學位學院名稱
外國學位研究所名稱
學年度 102
學期 2
出版年 103
研究生(中文) 黃玉萍
研究生(英文) Yu-Ping Huang
學號 894010239
學位類別 博士
語言別 英文
第二語言別
口試日期 2014-06-23
論文頁數 247頁
口試委員 指導教授 - 黃月貴(ykhuang@mail.tku.edu.tw)
委員 - 彭欽清(pcc@nccu.edu.tw)
委員 - 陳純音(chunyin@ntnu.edu.tw)
委員 - 范瑞玲(fahn@nuu.edu.tw)
委員 - 張雅慧(yechang@mail.tku.edu.tw)
關鍵字(中) 廣泛閱讀
閱讀能力
閱讀習慣
學習態度
以英語為外國語之中低程度大學學生
關鍵字(英) extensive reading
reading proficiency
reading habits
learning attitudes
low or pre-intermediate EFL college students
第三語言關鍵字
學科別分類
中文摘要
本研究採用課堂行動研究,輔以量化與質化研究法探討廣泛閱讀(extensive reading)教學對中低英文程度大學生在學習態度、閱讀習慣及閱讀能力表現的影響。研究將廣泛閱讀結合傳統精讀(intensive reading)教學課程,探索使用分級讀本及兒童英文繪本對學習態度與閱讀習慣的影響,事後並針對閱讀理解及閱讀流暢度進行施測,檢視廣泛閱讀的成效。
本研究共分三個階段:「預試一」、「預試二」及「主要研究」。「預試一」的目的在於了解研究者所服務之科技大學學生的閱讀習慣及態度,以及閱讀理解能力,以規劃適合的廣泛閱讀活動及挑選合適的教材;「預試二」的目的在於設計及選擇適當的測驗工具,以客觀檢測受試學生的閱讀理解表現。「主要研究」受試者為113位非應英系大二學生,共分四班,其中二班廣泛閱讀組(一班高級班、一班中級班)除了每週二節課使用學校指定的教科書並施以傳統精讀教學外,第三節課主要採用分級讀本及兒童英文繪本與持續安靜閱讀(sustained silent reading)活動之方式進行;另外二班傳統精讀組(一班高級班、一班中級班)除了每週二節課使用學校指定的教科書外,第三節課主要以練習本複習上過的課程內容之方式進行,研究為期一學期。資料收集包括前一學期(Fall 2012)的班級學期成績(即大二英文統一線上測驗期中考加期末考成績平均數)、英文詞彙量、英文閱讀理解及速讀測驗、英文閱讀習慣與學習態度前後測問卷、教師課堂日誌、學生讀書心得報告等。研究資料分析採二因子變異係數分析統計及成對樣本T檢定重複量數分析,比較高級班、中級班各兩組學生在閱讀能力測驗之得分差異與閱讀習慣、對廣泛閱讀活動及英文學習態度之差異。
主要發現如下,廣泛閱讀課程後:(1)廣泛閱讀組在提昇中低英文程度大學生閱讀理解能力上,透過一常模參照測驗(CSEPT)表現優於傳統精讀組,其中高級班廣泛閱讀組優於其他三組,(2)高級班和中級班廣泛閱讀組在教師自行設計之閱讀理解測驗表現皆優於傳統精讀組,且高級班和中級班表現無顯著差異,(3)中級班廣泛閱讀組在出版社設計之閱讀理解測驗表現優於傳統精讀組,且與高級班廣泛閱讀組之間無顯著差異,(4)在教師自行設計與出版社設計之二種閱讀理解測驗表現上,中級班廣泛閱讀組與高級班廣泛閱讀組之間無顯著差異,原因可能是因為中級班比高級班閱讀較多的分級讀本,(5)廣泛閱讀組在閱讀流暢度上與傳統精讀組無顯著差異,且高級班優於中級班,(6)在提升學生閱讀習慣、對廣泛閱讀活動態度及學習英文態度上相較閱讀活動前有顯著進步,(7)學生對於老師指定之簡易讀本表示太難,認為自選讀本較易懂且有趣,(8)比起免費網路故事書,紙本圖書在本研究廣泛閱讀活動實施上較為實際可行。最後,根據本研究發現建議屬性相同之科技大學或技術學院教師教授中低英文程度學生時,可採納廣泛閱讀活動以加強學生的學習態度、閱讀習慣與閱讀能力,亦可作為教學者及未來研究者之參考。
英文摘要
The study explores the effects of extensive reading (ER) on EFL college students of elementary or pre-intermediate level in learning attitudes, reading habits, and reading performances by undertaking a classroom action research in conjunction with both quantitative and qualitative methods. The ER practices were integrated in existing intensive reading (IR) curriculum, to investigate the influence on the students' learning attitudes and reading habits with the use of graded readers (GR) and books for native English speaking children (BNESC). The students' reading proficiency and reading fluency were also explored after the treatment.
The study was divided into three stages—Pilot Study One, Pilot Study Two, and the Main Study. Pilot study one aimed to recognize the college students' reading habits, learning attitudes, and reading proficiency, which helped the teachers tailor appropriate instructional approaches and class materials. Pilot study two aimed to design and select eligible test instruments in order to objectively assess the participants’ reading proficiency. A total of 113 non-English major sophomores from four intact classes participated in the main study which lasted for a semester. There were two ER classes (1 Level A class, and 1 Level B class) and two IR classes (1 Level A class, and 1 Level B class). The ER groups were exposed to GR and BNESC during sustained silent reading (SSR) session in the last hour of the weekly three-hour course following the two-hour skills-based or IR instruction, adopting a school-designated textbook. The comparison groups were taught with the school-designated textbook in the first two-hour, and were directed to review the reading texts in the textbook and complete a workbook exercise in the last hour of the weekly three-hour course session. Both quantitative and qualitative data were collected, including the class term grades of the first semester in Fall 2012 (i.e., mean scores combining the unified online midterm and final exam grades) before treatment, Vocabulary Size Test, several English reading comprehension tests, a speed reading test, pre- and post-treatment surveys, teacher’s logs, and students’ written reports. The study adopted a two-way ANOVA with repeated measure analysis to examine the effects of ER on reading proficiency, reading habits, and attitudes toward the ERP and toward English learning in general.
The overall results of the study displayed that, after the treatment, (1) the ERP had a positive influence on the college students of elementary or pre-intermediate level in reading comprehension based on a norm-referenced test result (i.e., CSEPT). In particular, the Level A ER group (or E1) made a significant gain in comparison with the other three groups. (2) Both of the ER groups outperformed the IR groups on the teacher-designed post-reading test while no significant difference was detected between the groups of different levels. (3) The Level B ER group (or E2) made a significant gain on the publisher’s custom-made reading test compared with their counterpart group (or C2) while no significant difference was found between the ER groups. (4) The reason for the non-significant difference between the ER groups on the teacher-designed post-reading test and publisher’s custom-made reading test could be attributed to the fact that E2 read much more GR than E1. (5) Neither ER nor IR groups demonstrated any significant differences in terms of their reading speed after receiving the instructions. However, groups of different levels showed significant difference. (6) There was significant improvement on both ER groups in reading habits, attitudes toward the ERP and English learning in general. (7) Students expressed that teacher-selected class readers were harder than and not as interesting as those selected by themselves. (8) Reading paper-back GR or BNESC was more suitable and viable than reading free online books for the students in the study. Pedagogical implications were proposed for teachers at technological universities or technical colleges in similar educational contexts alongside the research findings.
第三語言摘要
論文目次
ABSTRACT	i
DEDICATION	v
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS	vi
TABLE OF CONTENTS	vii
LIST OF TABLES	xiv
LIST OF FIGURES	xvii

CHAPTER 1 Introduction
1.1	Statement of the Problem	1
1.2	Background and Motivation	3
1.3	Purpose of the Study	9
1.4	Research Questions	9
1.5	Significance of the Study	10
1.6	Definition of Key Terms	11
1.7	Organization of the Study	15
 
CHAPTER 2 Literature Review
        2.1 An Overview of Reading	18
        	2.1.1 The models of reading	19
		The bottom-up reading model	20
		The top-down reading model	21
		The interactive model	22
		Anderson and Pearson’s schema-theoretic view	25
	2.1.2 First language reading and second (or foreign) language 
	reading	27
	2.1.3 Approaches to teaching reading (intensive versus extensive)	32
	2.1.4 Reading is developmental	34
		Readers make progress by reading more	34
		Skills required for proficient reading	35
	2.1.5 The current reading habits among students in Taiwan	40
	2.2 Extensive Reading (ER)	43
	2.2.1 Principles of ER	44
	2.2.2 Why ER?	50
	2.2.3 How to implement ER?	53
	2.2.4 Previous studies on ER	56
	2.2.5 Issues pertaining to ER	62
		Authentic materials and graded readers	62
		Attitude and the significance of ER	65
		The ER Bootstrap Hypothesis and Pleasure Hypothesis	66
		Performance evaluation	67
		Approaches to evaluate language learners’ performance	67
	2.3 Current English Teaching and Learning Circumstances in Taiwan	70
	       2.4 Modified Extensive Reading Program (Modified ERP)	72
	2.4.1 How much “extensive reading” is enough?	73
	2.4.2 Reading materials and students’ language proficiency	74
	2.4.3 Classroom action research (AR)	75
	2.5 Summary	79

CHAPTER 3 Pilot Studies
	3.1 Pilot Study One	82
	3.1.1 Participants	83
		3.1.2 Aims of pilot study one	84
	3.1.3 Research questions	84
	3.1.4 Methods	85
		Reading materials	85
		Modified ERP	86
	3.1.5 Data collection of pilot study one	88
		Pre- and post-reading tests	88
		Pre- and post-reading questionnaires	89
	3.1.6 Data analysis	90
		Quantitative	90
		Qualitative	90
	3.1.7 Results of the questionnaires	91
	3.1.8 Interviews	95
	3.1.9 Findings and implications for the main study	96
	3.2 Pilot Study Two	97
	3.2.1 Setting and participants	97
	3.2.2 Aims of pilot study two	98
	3.2.3 Test materials	99
	3.2.4 Procedures	100
	3.2.5 Results of pilot study two	100
	3.2.6 Implications for the main study	102

CHAPTER 4 The Main Study
	4.1 Rationale of the Study	106
	4.2 Aims of the Study	106
	4.3 Research Methodology	107
	4.3.1 Participants and research setting	107
	4.3.2 Research design	109
	4.3.3 Treatments	110
	ER groups	110
	Comparison (IR) groups	112
	4.3.4 Materials	112
	Teaching materials: College English 2	112
	Reading materials	113
	4.3.5 Instruments	115
		Pre-tests	115
		Post-tests	118
	Surveys	119
	Teacher’s logs	121
	Students’ written reports	121
	4.3.6 Procedures	122
	4.3.7 Data analysis	126

CHAPTER 5 Results
	5.1 Results of the Preliminary Analysis between ER and IR groups	128
	5.1.1 Term grades of GE 2 of fall 2012	128
	5.1.2 Homogeneity analysis for the Vocabulary Size Test 
	(5,000 words)	130
	5.1.3 Homogeneity test and current reading ability from CSEPT 
		R1	132
	5.2 Language Development	135
	5.2.1 Results of CSEPT R2	135
	5.2.2 Results of the teacher-designed post-reading test	138
	5.2.3 Results of the publisher’s reading comprehension test	140
	5.2.4 Results of the reading fluency test	142
	5.3 Attitude and Reading Habit Development	145
	5.3.1 Comparison between the pre- and post-treatment surveys	145
	5.3.2 Attitude toward the ERP	148
	5.3.3 Students’ feedback toward English learning and the ERP	150
	5.4 Teacher’s Logs	155
	5.5 Students’ Written Reports	159
	5.6 Summary	165


CHAPTER 6 Discussions and Conclusion
	6.1 Discussions	168
	6.1.1 Reading performances	169
	6.1.2 Reading habits and learning attitudes	174
	6.1.3 Teacher’s logs	178
	6.1.4 Book features, number of books read, and time spent on 
	reading	180
	6.2 Pedagogical Implications	182
	6.3 Limitations and Suggestions for Future Research	185
	6.4 Conclusion	187

REFERENCES	190
APPENDICES	221


LIST OF TABLES
Table 2-1  Drawbacks of bottom-up and top-down models	22
Table 2-2  Comparing Extensive Reading with Intensive Reading	34
Table 3-1  Frequency of leisure reading in any language	92
Table 3-2  Frequency of leisure reading in English	92
Table 3-3  Students’ perceptions on reading habit formation for improving 
general English ability	93
Table 3-4  Students’ attitudes toward GIR in forming a reading habit in English	94
Table 3-5  Students’ ability to choose appropriate reading materials	94
Table 3-6  Mean and SD of the Vocabulary Levels Test	101
Table 3-7  Mean and SD of the teacher-designed reading comprehension test	102
Table 4-1  Participants’ background information	108
Table 4-2  The GE 2 curriculum combined with ERP	125
Table 5-1  Descriptive statistics for GE 2 term grades of fall 2012	129
Table 5-2  Descriptive statistics for the Vocabulary Size Test	130
Table 5-3  Test of Homogeneity of Variances	131
Table 5-4  Result of two-way ANOVA for the Vocabulary Size Test	131
Table 5-5  Descriptive statistics for CSEPT R1	133
Table 5-6  Test of Homogeneity of Variances	133
Table 5-7  Result of two-way ANOVA for CSEPT R1	134
Table 5-8  Descriptive statistics for CSEPT R2	135
Table 5-9  Result of two-way ANOVA for CSEPT R2	136
Table 5-10 Pure main effect analysis for CSEPT R2	137
Table 5-11 Descriptive statistics for the teacher-designed post-reading test	138
Table 5-12 Result of two-way ANOVA for the teacher-designed reading test	139
Table 5-13 Descriptive statistics for the publisher-designed reading test	140
Table 5-14 Result of two-way ANOVA for the publisher-designed reading test	141
Table 5-15 Pure main effect analysis for the publisher-designed reading test	142
Table 5-16 Descriptive statistics for the reading fluency test	143
Table 5-17 Result of two-way ANOVA for the reading fluency test	144
Table 5-18 Paired samples statistics of pre- and post-treatment surveys	146
Table 5-19 Result of paired samples t-test of pre- and post-treatment surveys	146
Table 5-20 Paired samples statistics of pre- and post-treatment surveys	147
Table 5-21 Result of paired samples t-test of pre- and post-treatment surveys	148
Table 5-22 Attitude toward the ERP	150
Table 5-23 Frequency count of students’ positive comments	151
Table 5-24 Frequency count of students’ negative comments	153
Table 5-25 Students’ reports on type of books read and reasons for choosing them	160
Table 5-26 Time spent on each book (and number of books)	162
Table 5-27 Summary of main findings among the four groups	165
 
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 2-1  Collins and Quillian’s (1969) Semantic Network Model (SNM)	26
Figure 2-2  The Virtuous Circle of the Good Reader (Nuttall, 2005)	34
Figure 2-3  The Vicious Circle of the Weak Reader (Nuttall, 2005)	42
Figure 3-1  Frequency of leisure reading in English among the pilot students	91
Figure 5-1  Mean scores of E1 students’ reading habits and attitudes	146
Figure 5-2  Mean scores of E2 students’ reading habits and attitudes	147
Figure 5-3  Frequency count of students’ positive comments	152
Figure 5-4  Frequency count of students’ negative comments	154
參考文獻
Aebersold, J. A., & Field, M. L. (1997). From reader to reading teacher: Issues and strategies for second language classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Alderson, J. C. (1984). Reading in a foreign language: A reading problem or a language problem? In J. C. Alderson & A. H. Urquhart (Eds.), Reading in a foreign language (pp. 1-27). London: Longman.
Alderson, J. C. (2000). Assessing reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Alshamrani, H. M. (2003). The attitudes and beliefs of ESL students about extensive reading of authentic texts. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania. UMI AAT 3080428. Retrieved from http://sunzi.lib.hku.hk/ER/detail/hkul/2984315
Anderson, N. J. (1999). Exploring second language reading: Issues and strategies. Canada: Heinle & Heinle.
Anderson, N. J. (2005). L2 strategy research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 757-772). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Anderson, T., & Pearson, P. D. (1988). A schematic-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In P. Carrell, J. Devine, & D. Eskey (Eds.), Interactive approaches to second language reading (pp. 37-55). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Asraf, R. M., & Ahmad, I.S. (2003). Promoting English language development and the reading habit among students in rural schools through guided extensive reading program. Reading in a Foreign Language, 15 (2), 83-102. Retrieved from http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/rfl/October2003/mohdasraf/mohdasraf.html
Baker, J. R. (2013). Choosing materials for a writing center resource library in an ELL setting. 
(Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, 2013). UMI AAT 3558065. ProQuest LLC.
Bamford, J. (1984a). Review of “The importance of extensive reading in language learning”. A presentation by Damien Tunnacliffe given at JALT 83’. The Language Teacher, 8 (1), 4-5.
Bamford, J., & Day, R. R. (1997). Extensive reading: What is it? Why bother? The Language Teacher, 21 (5), 6-8.
Bamford, J., & Day, R. R. (1998). Teaching reading. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 18, 124-141.
Barnett, M. A. (1989). More than meets the eye: Foreign language reading. Language and Education: Theory and Practice 73. New Jersey, U.S.: Center for Applied Linguistics and Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Barney, A., Choi, S., Clarke, C., Davies, W., Davis, H., Fill, K., … & Williams, I. (2013). What is your paradigm? eResearch Methods. Retrieved from http://www.erm.ecs.soton.ac.uk/theme2/what_is_your_paradigm.html
Bassett, J. (2011). Bringing extensive reading into the classroom: A series editor's view (1). In R. Day, J. Bassett, B. Bowler, S. Parminter, N. Bullard, M. Furr, …T. Robb (Eds.), Bringing extensive reading into the classroom: A practical guide to introducing extensive reading and its benefits to the learner (pp.22-32). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bell, T. (1994). “Intensive” versus “extensive” reading: A study of the use of graded readers as supplementary input material to traditional “intensive” reading techniques. Unpublished master’s TEFL Dissertation, University of Reading, Berkshire.
Bell, T. (1998). Extensive reading: why? and How? The Internet TESL Journal, 4 (12). Retrieved from http://iteslj.org/Articles/Bell-Reading.html
Bell, T. (2001). Extensive Reading: Speed and comprehension. The Reading Matrix, 1 (1). Retrieved from http://www.readingmatrix.com/articles/bell/
Berardo, S. A. (2006). The use of authentic materials in the teaching of reading. The Reading Matrix, 6 (2), 60-69. Retrieved from http://www.readingmatrix.com/articles/berardo/article.pdf
Bernhardt, E. B. (1991b). Reading development in a second language: Theoretical, empirical, and classroom perspectives. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Brantmeier, C. (2002). Second language reading strategy research at the secondary and university levels: Variations, disparities, and generalizability. The Reading Matrix, 2 (3), 1-14. Retrieved from http://readingmatrix.com/articles/brantmeier/article.pdf
Brown, R., Waring, R., & Donkaewbua, S. (2008). Incidental vocabulary acquisition from reading, reading-while-listening, and listening to stories. Reading in a Foreign Language, 20 (2), 136-163. Retrieved from http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/rfl
Brumfit, C. J. (1979). Readers for foreign learners of English (ETIC Information Guide 7). London: The British Council.
Brumfit, C. J. (1984). Communicative methodology in language teaching: The roles of fluency and accuracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Camiciottoli, B. (2001). Extensive reading in English: Habits and attitudes of a group of Italian university EFL students. Journal of Research in Reading, 24 (2), 135-153.
Carrell, P. L. (1983b). Some issues in studying the role of schemata, or background knowledge in second language comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 1 (2), 81-92.
Carrell, P. L. (1987). Readability in ESL. Reading in a Foreign Language, 4, 21-40.
Carrell, P. L. (1988). Interactive text processing: Implications for ESL and second language classrooms. In P. Carrell, J. Devine, & D. Eskey (Eds.), Interactive approaches to second language reading (pp. 239-259). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carrell, P. L., Devine, J., & Eskey, D. E. (1988). Interactive approaches to second language reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carrell, P., L., & Eisterhold, J. C. (1983). Schema theory and ESL reading pedagogy. In P. Carrell, J. Devine, & D. Eskey (Eds.), Interactive approaches to second language reading (pp. 73-92). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. American Association of Higher Education Bulletin, 39 (7), 1-7.
Cho, K. S., & Krashen, S. D. (1994). Acquisition of vocabulary from the Sweet Valley Kids series: Adult ESL acquisition. Journal of Reading, 37, 662-667.
Cho, K. S., & Krashen, S. D. (2001). Sustained silent reading experiences among Korean teachers of English as a foreign Language: The effect of a single exposure to interesting, comprehensible reading. Reading Improvement, 38 (4), 170-175. Retrieved from http://www.questia.com
Cho, K. S., & Krashen, S. D. (2002). Sustained silent reading experiences among Korean teachers of English as a foreign language: The effect of a single exposure to interesting, comprehensible reading. Reading Improvement, 38 (4), 170-174.
Coady, J. (1993). Research on ESL/EFL vocabulary acquisition: Putting it in context. In T. Huckin, M. Haynes, & J. Coady (Eds), Second language reading and vocabulary learning (pp. 3-23). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
Coady, J. (1997). L2 vocabulary acquisition through extensive reading. In J. Coady & T. Huckin (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition (pp. 225-237). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Davidson, C., Ogle, D., Ross, D., Tuhaka, J., & Ng, S. M. (1997). Student-created reading materials for extensive reading. In G. M. Jacobs, C. Davis, & W. A. Renandya (Eds.), Successful strategies for extensive reading (pp. 144-160). Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.
Davis, C. (1995). Extensive reading: An expensive extravagance? ELT Journal, 49 (4), 329-336.
Day, R. R. (2001). CAPE alumni Internet connection: English teacher talk. The Center for Asia-Pacific Exchange, Teacher Talk 1. Retrieved from http://www.cape.edu/docs/ttalkday1.pdf
Day, R. R. (2011). Extensive reading – the background. In R. Day, J. Bassett, B. Bowler, S. Parminter, N. Bullard, M. Furr, …T. Robb (Eds.), Bringing extensive reading into the classroom: A practical guide to introducing extensive reading and its benefits to the learner. (pp.10-21). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Day, R. R., & Bamford, J. (1998). Extensive reading in the second language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Day, R. R., & Bamford, J. (2000). Reaching reluctant readers. English Teaching Forum, 38 (3), 12-17.
Day, R. R., & Bamford, J. (2002). Top ten principles for teaching extensive reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 14 (2), 136-141.
Devine, J. (1981). Developmental patterns in native and nonnative reading acquisition. In S. Hudelson (Ed.), Learning to read in different languages (pp. 103-114). Washington, D. C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.
Derewianka, B. (1997). Using the Internet for extensive reading. In G. M. Jacobs, C. Davis, & W. A. Renandya (Eds.), Successful strategies for extensive reading (pp. 128-143). Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.
Dupuy, B. (1997). Literature circles: An alternative framework for increasing intermediate FL students’ comprehension of texts in the target language. Mosaic, 5 (1), 13-16.
Dupuy, B., & McQuillan, J. (1997). Handcrafted books: Two for the price of one. In G. M. Jacobs, C. Davis, & W. A. Renandya (Eds.), Successful strategies for extensive reading (pp. 171-180). Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.
Ebrahimi, S. S. (2011). A comparison of different reading strategies while reading modern vs Shakespearian poems. 2011 International Conference on Humanities, Society and Culture IPEDR, 20, 324-327.
Edinburgh Project on Extensive Reading (EPER) Graded Reader Database and Booklists (1981-present). Edinburgh: Institute for Applied Language Studies, University of Edinburgh.
Elley, W. B. (1984). Exploring the reading difficulties of second-language learners in Fiji. In J. C. Alderson & A. H. Urquhart (Eds.), Reading in a foreign language (pp. 281-297). London: Longman.
Elley, W. B. (1991). Acquiring literacy in a second language: The effect of book-based programs. Language Learning, 41, 375-411.
Elley, W. B., & Mangubhai, F. (1981). The impact of a book flood in Fiji primary schools. Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
Elley, W. B., & Manghubai, F. (1983). The impact of reading on second language learning.  Reading Research Quarterly, 19 (1), 53-67.
Erten, I. H., & Razı, R. (2009). The effects of cultural familiarity on reading comprehension.  Turkey Reading in a Foreign Language, 21 (1), 60–77.
Eskey, D. E. (1973). A model program for teaching advanced reading to students of English as a foreign language. Language Learning, 23, 169-184. [Reprinted in R. Mackay, B. Barkman, & R. R. Jordan (Eds.), Reading in a second language: Hypotheses, organization, and practice (pp. 66-78). Rowley, MA: Newbury House,1979].
Eskey, D. E. (1986). Theoretical foundations. In F. Dublin, D. E. Eskey, W. Grabe (Eds.), Teaching second language reading for academic purposes (pp. 3–23). Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Eskey, D. E. (1988). Holding in the bottom: An interactive approach to the language problems of second language readers. In P. Carrell, J. Devine, & D. Eskey (Eds.), Interactive approaches to second language reading (pp. 93-100). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge.
Erten, İ. H., & Razı, S. (2009). The effects of cultural familiarity on reading comprehension. Turkey Reading in a Foreign Language, 21 (1), 60–77.
Ferguson, P. B. (2011). Action research for professional development: Concise advice for new and experienced action researchers. Dorset: September Books.
Freire, P. (1993). Pedagogy of the oppressed. London: The Continuum International Publishing Group Inc.
Fry, E. (1991). Ten best ideas for reading teachers. In E. Fry (Ed.), Ten best ideas for reading    teachers (pp. 6-16). Menlo Park, Calif.: Addison-Wesley.
Gascoigne, C. (2005). Toward an understanding of the relationship between L2 reading comprehension and grammatical competence. The Reading Matrix, 5 (2), 1-14.
Gentry, J. E. (2008). Reading models [Online]. Retrieved from http://www.learningwithjamesgentry.com/Reading%20Models.html
Goodman, K. (1967). Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game. Journal of the Reading Specialist, 6 (4), 126-135.
Gough, P. B. (1972). One second of reading. In J. F. Kavanagh & I. G. Mattingly (Eds.), Language by ear and by eye: The relationships between speech and reading (pp. 331–358). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Grabe, W. (1991). Current developments in second language reading research. TESOL Quarterly, 25, 375-406.
Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Grellet, F. (1981). Developing reading skills. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Guthrie, J. T., Schafer, W. D., & Huang, C. W. (2010). Benefits of opportunity to read and balanced instruction on NAEP. The Journal of Educational Research, 94 (3), 145-162.
Hafiz, F. M., & Tudor, I. (1989). Extensive reading and the development of language skills. ELT Journal,34 (1), 5-13.
Hafiz, F. M., & Tudor, I. (1990). Graded readers as an input medium in L2 learning. System, 18, 31-42.
Hayashi, K. (1999). Reading strategies and extensive reading in EFL classes. RELC Journal, 30, 114-132.
Helgesen, M. (1997a). Bringing those books back to the classroom: Tasks for extensive reading. The Language Teacher, 21 (5), 53-54.
Helgesen, M. (1997b). What one extensive reading program looks like. The Language Teacher, 21 (5), 31-33.
Hill, D. R. (1997). Setting up an extensive reading programme: Practical tips. The Language Teacher Online [Online]. Retrieved from http://www.jalt-publications.org/tlt/files/97/may/hill.html
Hill, D. R., & Thomas, R. H. (1988a). Guided readers (Part 1). ELT Journal, 42(1), 44-52.
Hill, D. R., & Thomas, R. H. (1988b). Guided readers (Part 2). ELT Journal, 42(1), 124-136.
Horst, M. (2005). Learning L2 vocabulary through extensive reading: A measurement study. Canadian Modern Language Review, 61, 355-382.
Horwitz, E. K. (1986). Some language acquisition principles and their implications for second language teaching. Hispania, 69 (3), 684–689.
Hsu, Y. Y., & Lee, S. Y. (2007). Extensive reading and EFL junior college in Taiwan. Studies of English Language and Literature, 20, 137-145. (NSC94-2411-H-305-004).
Hu, M., & Nation, I.S.P. (2000). Vocabulary density and reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 13 (1), 403-430.
Huang, Y. K. (2011). Extensive reading: Why and how? A colloquium speech presented at The 28th International Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the R.O.C., Taichung: National Taichung University of Education, Taiwan.
Huang, Y. P. (2012). Applying extensive reading as a supplementary program to beginning-level EFL learners in college general English classrooms. Paper presented at The 29th International Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the R.O.C., Taipei: Chinese Culture University, Taiwan.
Huang, Y. P., & Wu, Y. C. (2010). A working paper on the implementation of modified extensive reading in college General English classrooms. Proceedings of Yu Da University 2010 Conference on Language and Literature Education, 77-100.
Ismail, I. S. (2008). Tsl 591: Methodology of teaching reading [Online]. Retrieved from http://tsl591.blogspot.tw/
Iwahori, Y. (2008). Developing reading fluency: A study of extensive reading in EFL. Reading in a Foreign Language, 20(1). Retrieved from http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/rfl/April2008/iwahori/iwahori.html
Janopoulos, M. (1986). The relationship of pleasure reading and second language writing proficiency. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 763-768.
Johnson, D. M. (1991). Approaches to research in second language learning. New York: Longman.
Kamil, M. L. (2003). Adolescents and literacy: Reading for the 21st century. New York: Alliance for Excellent Education.
Kao, Y. M. (2004). A Study of Using Extensive Reading as a Supplement in a Senior High School English Curriculum. (Master’s thesis, National Tsing Hwa University, 2004). National Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations in Taiwan.
Kembo, J. (1993). Reading: Encouraging and maintaining individual extensive reading. English Teaching Forum, 31 (2), 36-38.
Kern, R. G. (1988). Foreign language reading: Linguistic, cognitive, and affective factors which influence comprehension. In Report of the Southern Conference on Language Teaching, Educational Resources Information Center.
Kim, H., & Cho, K.S. (2005). The influence of first language reading on second language reading and second language acquisition. The International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 1 (4), 13-16. Retrieved from http://www.tprstories.com/ijflt/IJFLTFall05
Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.
Krashen, S. D. (1989). We acquire vocabulary and spelling by reading: Additional evidence for the input hypothesis. Modern Language Journal, 73, 440-464.
Krashen, S. D. (1993). The power of reading: Insight from the research. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited Inc.
Krashen, S. D. (1993b). The effect of formal grammar study: Still peripheral. TESOL Quarterly, 27, 722-725.
Krashen, S. D. (1994). The input hypothesis and its rivals. In N. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 45-77). London: Academic Press.
Krashen, S. D. (1994b). The pleasure hypothesis. In J. Alatis (Ed.), Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics (pp. 299-322). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Krashen, S. D. (1997). The comprehension hypothesis: recent evidence. English Teachers’ Journal, 51, 17-29.
Krashen, S. D. (2001a). The testing movement and delayed gratification. Educators for Urban Minorities, 2 (1), 48-50.
Krashen, S. D. (2004). The power of reading. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann. 
Krashen, S. D. (2005). Free voluntary reading: New research, applications, and controversies. In G. Poedjosoedarmo (Ed.), Innovative approaches to reading & writing instruction (pp. 1-9). Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.
Krashen, S. D. (2005b). Is in-school free reading good for children? Why the national reading panel report is (still) wrong? Phi Delta Kappan, 86 (6), 444-447.
Krashen, S. D. (2007). Extensive reading in English as a foreign language by adolescents and young adults: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 3 (2), 23-29.
Krashen, S. D. (2009). Generalizations about free voluntary reading. IATEFL Young Learner and Teenager Special Interest Group Publication, 1, 1-6.
Krashen, S. D., Lee, S. Y., & McQuillan (2008). Do libraries contribute to gains in reading between grades 4 and 8? Poster session presented at the 27th Annual American Library Association. June 28-30, Anaheim, California. 
Krashen, S. D., Lee, S. Y., & McQuillan, J. (2010). An analysis of the PIRLS (2006) data: Can the school library reduce the effect of poverty on reading achievement? CSLA Journal, 34(1).
Krashen, S. D., & Terrell, T. (1983). The natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom. Hayward, CA: Alemany Press.
Kuo, N. H. (2005). Graded readers and young adult literature in an extensive reading classroom. (Master’s thesis, National Tsing Hua University, 2005). National Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations in Taiwan.
Lai, E. F. K. (1993a). Effect of extensive reading on English learning in Hong Kong. CUHK Education Journal, 21 (1), 23-36.
Lai, E. F. K. (1993b). The effect of a summer reading course on reading and writing skills. System, 21, 87-100.
Lao, C., & Krashen, S. D. (2008). Heritage language development: Exhortation or good stories? International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 4 (2), 17-18.
Laufer, B. (1989). What percentage of text-lexis is essential for comprehension? In C. Lauren & M. Nordman (Eds.), Special language: From humans thinking to thinking machines. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Laufer, B. (1997). The lexical plight in second language reading: Words you don't know, words you think you know, and words you can’t guess. In J. Coady & T. Huckin (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy (pp. 20–34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Laufer, B., & Goldstein, Z. (2004). Testing vocabulary knowledge: Size, strength, and computer adaptiveness. Language Learning, 54 (3), 399-436. DOI: 10.1111/j.0023-8333.2004.00260.x
Laufer, B., & Nation, I.S.P. (1990). Vocabulary Levels Test (Productive), adapted for WWW by Tom Cobb [Online]. Retrieved from http://www.lextutor.ca/tests/levels/productive/
Laufer, B., & Ravenhorst-Kalovski, G. C. (2010). Lexical threshold revisited: Lexical text coverage, learners’ vocabulary size and reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 22 (1), 15-30.
Lee, K. K. (2005). Ways of integrating ICT in extensive reading: A case study. Unpublished master’s thesis, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Lee, S. Y. (2005). Sustained silent reading using assigned reading: Is comprehensible input enough? The International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 1 (4), 10-12. Retrieved from http://www.tprstories.com/ijflt/IJFLTFall05
Lee, S. Y. (2006). A one-year study of SSR: University level EFL students in Taiwan. The International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 2 (1), 6-8. Retrieved from http://www.tprstories.com/ijflt/IJFLTWinter06.pdf
Lee, S. Y. (2007). Revelations from three consecutive studies on extensive reading. RELC Journal, 38, 150-170.
Lee, S. Y., & Hsu, Y. Y. (2009). Determining the crucial characteristics of extensive reading programs: The impact of extensive reading on EFL writing. The International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching (IJFLT), 12-20.
Li, Y. C. (2004). A study of technological university freshmen’s performances in decoding vocabulary and strategy selection. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Yunlin University of Science & Technology, Douliu, Taiwan.
Liu, N., & Nation, I. S. P. (1985). Factors affecting guessing vocabulary in context. RELC Journal, 16 (1), 33-42.
Lituanas, P. M., Jacobs, G. M., & Renandya, W. A. (1999). A study of extensive reading with remedial reading students. In Y. M. Cheah & S. M. Ng (Eds.), Language instructional issues in Asian classrooms (pp. 89-104). Newark, DE: International Development in Asia Committee, International Reading Association. Retrieved from http://extensivereading.net/er/bibdocs/lituanas_et_al.doc
Ma, Y. H (2014). Integrated reading instructional effects on EFL college freshmen’s reading attitudes/motivation (Doctoral dissertation, Tamkang University, 2014). National Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations in Taiwan.
Majid, S., & Tan, V. (2007). Understanding the reading habits of children in Singapore. Journal of Educational Media & Library Sciences, 45, 187-198. Retrieved from http://joemls.dils.tku.edu.tw/fulltext/45/45-2/187-198.pdf
Martin, W. E., & Bridgmon, K. D. (2012). Quantitative and statistical research methods: From hypothesis to results. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Mason, B., & Krashen, S. (1997a). Can extensive reading help unmotivated students of EFL improve? I.T.L. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 79-84.
Mason, B., & Krashen, S. (1997b). Extensive reading in English as a foreign language. System, 25, 91-102.
McQuillan, J. (1994). Reading versus grammar: What students think is pleasurable and beneficial for language acquisition. Applied Language Learning, 5, 95-100.
McQuillan, J. (1998b). The use of self-selected and free voluntary reading in heritage language programs: A review of research. In S. D. Krashen, L. Tse, & J. McQuillan (Eds.), Heritage language development (pp. 73-88). Culver City, CA: Language Education Associates.
Mejı'a, R., Lo'pez, A., & Molina, A. (2007). Experiences in developing collaborative engineering environments: An action research approach. Computers in Industry, 58(4), 329-346.
Mikulecky, B. S. (1990). A short course in teaching reading skills. New York: Addison-Wesley.
Mikulecky, B. S. (2008). Teaching reading in a second language. Pearson Education, Inc., 1-6.
Nagy, W., & Anderson, R. C. (1984). How many words are there in printed school English? 
Reading Research Quarterly, 	19, 304-330.
Nagy, W., & Herman, P. (1987). Breadth and depth of vocabulary knowledge: Implications for acquisition and instruction. In M. G. Mckeown & M. E. Curtis (Eds.), The nature of vocabulary acquisition (pp. 19-35). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Nation, I.S.P. (2012). Vocabulary Size Test instructions and description [Online]. Retrieved from http://www.victoria.ac.nz/lals/about/staff/publications/paul-nation/Vocabulary-Size-Test-information-and-specifications.pdf
Nation, I.S.P., & Beglar, D. (2007). A Vocabulary Size Test. The Language Teacher, 31(7), 9-13.
Nation, I. S. P., & Waring, R. (1997). Vocabulary size, text coverage, and word lists. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 6–19). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
National Reading Panel (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction [Online]. Retrieved from http://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/pubs/nrp/Pages/report.aspx
North, B. (2007). Reference level descriptions (RLD) for national and regional languages. The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages. Retrieved from www.coe.int/t/dg4/.../North-Forum-paper_EN.doc
Nunan, D. (1991). Language teaching methodology. Hertfordshire: Prentice Hall International.
Nunan, D. (1992). Research methods in language learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Nunan, D. (2006). Action research and professional growth. Paper presented at The 1st JALT Joint Tokyo Conference: Action Research – Influencing Classroom Practice.
Nuttall, C. (1996). Teaching reading skills in a foreign language (2nd Ed.). Oxford: Heinemann English Language Teaching.
Nuttall, C. (2005). Teaching reading skills in a foreign language (3rd Ed.). Oxford: Macmillan Education.
Pan, J. (2013, October, 24). Taiwan lagging behind in English proficiency. Taipei Times, p.3.
Pang, E. S., Muaka, A., Bernhardt, E. B., & Kamil, M. L. (2003). Teaching reading: Educational practices series-12. The International Academy of Education. Bellegarde, France: SADAG.
Paran, A. (1996). Reading in EFL: Facts and fictions. ELT Journal, 50 (1), 25-34. DOI: 10.1093/elt/50.1.25
Penner-Wilger, M. (2008). Reading fluency: A bridge from decoding to comprehension. Ottawa: AutoSkill International Inc.
Pilgreen, J., & Krashen, S. (1993). Sustained silent reading with English as a second language high school students: Impact on reading comprehension, reading frequency, and reading enjoyment. School Library Media Quarterly, 22, 21-23.
Pinnell, G. S., Pikulski, J. J., Wixson, K.K., Campbell, J. R., Gough, P. B., & Beatty, A. S. (1995). Listening to children read aloud. Washington, D. C.: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.
Pitts, M., White, H., & Krashen, S. (1989). Acquiring second language vocabulary through reading: A replication of the Clockwork Orange study using second language acquirers. Reading in a Foreign Language, 5, 271-275.
Polak, J., & Krashen, S. (1988). Do we need to teach spelling? The relationship between spelling and voluntary reading among community college ESL students. TESOL Quarterly, 22, 141-146.
Powell, S. (2005). Extensive reading and its role in Japanese high schools. The Reading Matrix, 5(2), 28-38.
Prentice, N. (2011). An extensive reading project in Jordan. In R. Day, J. Bassett, B. Bowler, S. Parminter, N. Bullard, M. Furr, …T. Robb (Eds.), Bringing extensive reading into the classroom: A practical guide to introducing extensive reading and its benefits to the learner (pp. 76-85). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Extensive Reading into the Classroom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Quinn, E., Nation, I. S. P., & Millett, S. (2007). Asian and pacific speed readings for ESL learners - Twenty passages written at the one thousand word level. English Language Institute Occasional Publication, 24, 1-53. 
Rao, D. B. (2009). Reading skills for college students. New Delhi, India: Discovery Publishing House PVT. Ltd.
Rasinski, T. V. (2004). Assessing reading fluency. Pacific Resources for Education and Learning. Retrieved from http://www.prel.org/products/re_/assessing-fluency.htm
Renandya, W. A., Rajan, B. R. S., & Jacobs, G. M. (1999). Extensive reading with adult learners of English as a second language. RELC Journal, 30, 39-61.
Robb, T. N., & Susser, B. (1989). Extensive reading vs. skills building in an EFL context.  Reading in a Foreign Language, 5, 239-249.
Rodrigo, V. (1997). Are students in intermediate Spanish courses aware of the benefits of reading? Hispania, 80, 255-264.
Ronan, B., Rob, W., & Sangrawee, D. (2008). Incidental vocabulary acquisition from reading, reading-while-listening, and listening to stories. Reading in a Foreign Language, 20, 136-163. Retrieved from http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/rfl
Rumelhart , D. E. (1977). Toward an interactive model of reading. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance IV (pp. 573-603). Hillsdale, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.
Russell, H. J. (1942). We learn to read by reading, providing the reading materials are scientifically graded. Hispania, 25 (1), 66-72.
Samuels, S. J., & Kamil, M. L. (1988). Models of the reading process. In P. Carrell, J. Devine, & D. Eskey (Eds.), Interactive Approaches to Second Language Reading (pp. 22-36). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Reprinted from Samuels, S. J., & Kamil, M. L. (1984). Models of the reading process. In P. D. Pearson, P. Mosenthal, M. Kamil, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research. New York: Longman, Inc.)
Sanden, S. (2014). Out of the shadow of SSR: Real teachers’ classroom independent reading practices. Language Arts, 91 (3), 161-175.
Schmitt, N. (2000). Key concepts in ELT: Lexical chunks. English Language Teaching Journal, 54 (4), 400-401.
Schmitt, N. (2008). Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 12(3), 329-363.
Schulz, R. A. (1981). Literature and readability: Bridging the gap in foreign language reading. The Modern Language Journal, 65(1), 43-53.
Segalowitz, N. (1991). Does advanced skill in a second language reduce automaticity in the first language? Language Learning, 41, 59-83.
Segalowitz, N., Poulsen, C., & Komoda, M. (1991). Lower level components of reading skill in higher level bilinguals: Implications for reading instruction. AILA Review, 8 (1), 15-30.
Sheu, P. H. (2003). Extensive reading as a breakthrough in a traditional EFL curriculum: Experimental research in junior high schools in Taiwan (Doctoral dissertation, University of Warwick, 2003). Retrieved from http://go.warwick.ac.uk/wrap/2500
Sheu, P. H. (2004a). Reading ability development. Journal of National Taipei Teachers College, 17(2), 213-228.
Sheu, P. H. (2004b). The effect of two different types of reading materials on reading development. Dong Hwa Journal of Humanities,6, 291-318.
Sheu, P. H. (2004c). Students' reflections on the physical features of EFL graded readers. TESL Reporter, 37(1), 18-33.
Shohamy, E., & Seliger, H. W. (1990). Second language research methods. U.K.: Oxford University Press.
Simonton, D. K. (1988). Scientific genius: A psychology of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sims, J. M. (1996). A comparative study of improvements in reading comprehension of skill-based instruction and extensive reading for pleasure with Taiwanese freshman university students. Unpublished dissertation. Department of Curriculum and Instruction, Florida State University, Florida. UMI AAT 9700193. Retrieved from http://www.extensivereading.net/er/biblioall.php?sortby=alph
Singhal, M. (1998). A comparison of L1 and L2 Reading: Cultural differences and schema. The Internet TESL Journal, 4 (10), 1-8.
Smith, F. (1971). Understanding reading. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Stanovich, K. (1980). Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency. Reading research quarterly, 16, 32-71.
Stoller, F. (1986). Reading lab: Developing low-level reading skills. In F. Dubin, D. E. Eskey, & W. Grabe (Eds.), Teaching second language reading for academic purposes (pp. 51-76). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Sun, Y. C. (2003). Extensive reading online: an overview and evaluation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19, 438-446.
Susser, B., & Robb, T. N. (1990). EFL extensive reading instruction: Research and procedure. JALT Journal, 12 (2), 163-183.
Taguchi, E., Gorsuch, G. J., & Sasamoto, E. (2006). Developing second and foreign language reading fluency and its effect on comprehension: A missing link. The Reading Matrix, 6 (2), 1-17.
Taguchi, E., Takayasu-Maass, M., & Gorsuch, G. J. (2004). Developing reading fluency in EFL: How assisted repeated reading and extensive reading affect fluency development. Reading in a Foreign Language, 16 (2), 70-96.
Tamrackitkun, K. (2010). Extensive reading: An empirical study of its effects on EFL Thai students’ reading comprehension, reading fluency and attitudes (Doctoral dissertation, University of Salford, Manchester, 2010).
The Flesch Reading Ease Readability Formula (2013). Free readability tools to check for reading levels, reading assessment, and reading grade levels [Online]. Retrieved from http://www.readabilityformulas.com/flesch-reading-ease-readability-formula.php
Thorndike, E. L. (1917). Reading as reasoning: A study of mistakes in paragraph reading. The Journal of Educational Psychology, 323-332.
Torki, S. A., Kasmani, M. B., & Valipour, V. (2014). The effect of using L1 reading comprehension task on Iranian EFL learners’ L2 reading comprehension test score. Asian Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 3 (2), 37-43.
Tsang, W. K. (1996). Comparing the effects of reading and writing on writing performance.  Applied Linguistics, 17, 210-223.
Tudor, I., & Hafiz, F. (1989). Extensive reading as a means of input to L2 learning. Journal of Research in Reading, 12, 164-78.
Urquhart, A. H. (1987). Comprehensions and interpretations. Reading in a Foreign Language, 3(2), 387-409.
Urquhart, A. H., & Weir, C. J. (1998). Reading in a second language: Process, product and practice. New York: Addison Wesley Longman Ltd.
Vaezi, S. (2006). Teaching English. British Council. Retrieved from http://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/article/theories-reading
Wallace, C. (1992). Reading. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Waring, R. (1997). Graded and extensive reading – questions and answers. The Language Teacher, 21 (5), 9-12.
Waring, R. (2009). The inescapable case for extensive reading. In A. Cirocki (ed.). Extensive reading in English language teaching (pp. 93-111). Munich: Lincom Europa.
Waring, R. (2012). Setting up an extensive reading program [Online]. Retrieved from http://www.robwaring.org/er/ER_info/ersetup.html
Waring, R., & Nation, P. (2004). Second language reading and incidental vocabulary learning. Angles on the English Speaking World, 4, 11-23. Retrieved from http://geolangs.org/archives/sla/waring120304.pdf
Webb, S. (2008). The effects of context on incidental vocabulary learning. Reading in a Foreign Language, 20, 232-245. Retrieved from http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/rfl/October2008/webb/webb.pdf
Weir, C. (1993). Understanding and developing language tests. London: Prentice Hall.
West, (1953). A general service list of English words. London: Longman.
Widdowson, H. G. (1979). Explorations in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Widdowson, H. G. (1983). Learning purpose and language use. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Williams, R. (1986). “Top ten” principles for teaching reading. ELT Journal, 40(1), 42-45.
Wodinsky, M., & Nation, I. S. P. (1988). Learning from graded readers. Reading in a Foreign Language, 5, 155-161.
Woods, A., Fletcher, P., & Hughes, A. (1986). Statistics in language studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Worthy, J., & McKool, S. S. (1996). Students who say they hate to read: The importance of opportunity, choice, and access. In D. J. Leu, C. K. Kinzer, & K. A. Hinchman (Eds.), Literacies for the 21th century: Research and practice (pp. 245-256). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
Yamashita, J. (2001). Transfer of L1 reading ability to L2 reading: An elaboration of the linguistic threshold. 言語文化論集, 23 (1), 189-200.
Yamazaki, A. (1996). Vocabulary acquisition through extensive reading. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Temple University, Philadelphia. UMI AAT 9623819.
Yu, V. W. S. (1993). Extensive reading programs—How can they best benefit the teaching and learning of English. TESL Reporter, 26(1), 1-9.
Yu, V. W. S. (1999). Promoting second language development and reading habits through an extensive reading scheme. In Y. M. Cheah & S. M., Ng (Eds.), Language instruction issues in Asian classrooms (pp.59-74). Newark: International Reading Association.
李振清(2007a)。提昇高中生英語文統整能力的教學策略(上)。英語充電站,89。2007年11月07日,取自 http://www.lihpao.com/?action-viewnews-itemid-26853
李振清(2007b)。 提昇高中生英語文統整能力的教學策略(下)。英語充電站,89。2007年11月13日,取自http://www.lihpao.com/?action-viewnews-itemid-26696
李振清(2007b)。藉廣泛閱讀以提昇英語文能力的教學策略。英語充電站。2007年11月27日,取自http://tw.myblog.yahoo.com/jw!7_2RtzqBABJSL9fmPB7lX0lKgg--/article?mid=365
洪蘭 (2006)。主動學習、廣泛閱讀 青春要留白。聯合報。2006年03月21日,取自www.jwes.tyc.edu.tw/ClassSystemV2/.../2845_青春要留白.doc
胡清暉 (2013)。多益成績 台灣輸對岸200分。中國時報。2013年10月20日,取自http://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/%E5%A4%9A%E7%9B%8A%E6%88%90%E7%B8%BE-%E5%8F%B0%E7%81%A3%E8%BC%B8%E5%B0%8D%E5%B2%B8200%E5%88%86-20131020000288-260114
台灣人不愛念書? 每年只閱讀2本大書韓10冊。(2013, March 22)。ETtoday 東森新聞雲,生活中心/綜合報導。取自 http://www.ettoday.net/news/20130322/179571.htm
陳志豪,王鈞鈴,劉小曼(2009)。廣泛閱讀在學生英文學習上之調查研究—以遠東科技大學為例,遠東學報,25(2),349-364。
教育部技職司(2013)。Number of universities, colleges and students between 1995-2007。臺北市:作者。2013年3月31日,取自http://tve.cyu.edu.tw/
彭森明(2006)。台灣高等教育資料庫之建置。國科會人文處教育學門之「台灣高等教育資料庫之建置及相關議題探討」整合型研究計畫。2006年3月08日,取自http://web1.nsc.gov.tw/ct.aspx?xItem=7539&ctNode=39&mp=1
論文全文使用權限
校內
校內紙本論文立即公開
同意電子論文全文授權校園內公開
校內電子論文立即公開
校外
同意授權
校外電子論文立即公開

如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信