§ 瀏覽學位論文書目資料
  
系統識別號 U0002-1506201721580900
DOI 10.6846/TKU.2017.00498
論文名稱(中文) 影響企業自願性碳揭露的因素-以美國為例
論文名稱(英文) Factors Influencing Corporate Voluntary Carbon Disclosure-Evidence from USA
第三語言論文名稱
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中文) 會計學系碩士班
系所名稱(英文) Department of Accounting
外國學位學校名稱
外國學位學院名稱
外國學位研究所名稱
學年度 105
學期 2
出版年 106
研究生(中文) 林玉芬
研究生(英文) Yu-fen Lin
學號 604600105
學位類別 碩士
語言別 繁體中文
第二語言別
口試日期 2017-06-03
論文頁數 38頁
口試委員 指導教授 - 郭樂平
委員 - 黃仕斌
委員 - 楊志豪
關鍵字(中) 利害關係人理論
資源寬裕理論
自願性碳揭露
CDP
Tobit迴歸
關鍵字(英) Stakeholder theory
Slack resources theory
Voluntary carbon disclosure
CDP
Tobit regression
第三語言關鍵字
學科別分類
中文摘要
雖然利害關係人理論以及資源寬裕理論在環境資訊揭露的研究中被廣泛探討與支持,但利害關係人如何影響企業自願性碳揭露的實證文獻尚顯不足,以及資源寬裕對於環境資訊揭露的效果不一致,因此本研究聚焦探討企業自願性參與碳揭露計畫(Carbon Disclosure Project,以下簡稱CDP)的影響因素。研究樣本是以參與CDP調查報告的S&P 500企業,樣本期間為2008至2015年,共2,483個年觀測值,使用縱橫資料(Panel Data)Tobit迴歸來探討主要利害關係人(機構投資人及債權人)、綠色行動策略(環境支出及生態效益)及企業特性(環境產業敏感與否、獲利能力)對碳揭露分數影響程度,結果顯示掌握企業資金來源的機構投資人、債權人及較佳的企業生態效益訊號會正向顯著影響企業的碳揭露分數,此外分別觀察在金融危機及復甦期(2008至2010年)以及經濟穩定期(2011至2015年)不同期間,發現機構投資人力量在不同期間的效果不一致,在金融危機及復甦期為負向顯著,而整體期間及經濟穩定期間是正向顯著。在有獲利的前提下,企業規模越大時,會正向顯著影響碳揭露分數。機構投資人與債權人對環境的態度行為發揮力量也不一樣,在金融危機及復甦期以及經濟穩定期,債權人對碳揭露分數皆為正向顯著,而機構投資人在經濟穩定期為正向顯著,在金融危機及復甦期為負向顯著,這項研究結果可增加利害關係人理論及資源寬裕理論對企業自願性碳揭露的實證文獻補充。
英文摘要
Although stakeholder theory and slack resources theory are widely explored and supported in environmental disclosure research, empirical evidence about the role of stakeholders in firms’ voluntary carbon disclosure is still scarce, and slack resources theory are inconsistent with the effect of the environmental disclosure . Therefore, the present research focuses on influential factors that affect companies’ participation in voluntary Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP). The sample comprises firms listed in the CDP S&P 500 reports with the data of 2,483 firm-year observations (from 2008 to 2015). Panel data Tobit regressions are utilized to analyze the relationships between major stakeholders (i.e., institutional investors and creditors), green strategy (i.e., environmental expenditures and eco-efficiency), industry characteristics (i.e., environmental sensitivity and profit), and carbon disclosure scores. The results show that major stakeholders and eco-efficiency are significantly positively related to carbon disclosure scores. In addition, we observe different influences between  period of financial crisis(2008 to 2010) and economic stability(2011 to 2015). We found there was inconsistency among the institutional investors in relation to carbon disclosure score influence; in the period of financial crisis it was significantly negative, and in both periods of economic stability it was significantly positive. Under the conditions of profit, when the company size is bigger, there is a more significantly positive relation to the carbon disclosure score, and the current study can complement previous empirical studies discussing how stakeholder theory and slack resource theory are applied in the examination of firms’ voluntary carbon disclosure.
第三語言摘要
論文目次
謝誌	I
中文摘要	II
英文摘要	III
目錄	IV
圖表目錄	VI
第壹章、緒論	1
一、研究背景與動機	1
二、研究目的	3
三、研究架構流程	4
第貳章、文獻探討	4
一、碳揭露計畫	4
二、主要利害關係人與碳揭露	8
1. 機構投資人的股東行為主義	8
2. 債權人的綠色信貸力量	9
三、綠色行動策略與碳揭露	10
1.	環境支出	10
2. 生態效益	11
四、企業特性與碳揭露	12
1.	敏感產業	12
2.	獲利能力	13
第參章、研究方法	14
一、觀念性架構	14
二、變數衡量及實證模型	14
1.	依變數:碳揭露分數(D_S)	14
2.	實證模型	15
3.	自變數及控制變數	15
三、研究期間及樣本選取	15
四、研究方法	16
1.	敘述性統計	16
2.	縱橫資料模型(Panel data model)	16
第肆章、實證結果分析	17
一、敘述性統計分析	17
二、相關性分析	18
三、實證結果分析	20
四、額外分析	24
第伍章、結論與建議	32
一、研究結論	32
二、管理意涵	32
三、研究貢獻	33
四、研究限制及建議	33
參考文獻	34
英文文獻	34
網站資料	38

圖 1 1 :CDP S&P 500 歷年問卷回覆趨勢	1
表 2-1:CDP碳揭露計畫的相關文獻表	7
圖 3-1:觀念性架構	14
表 3-1:變數定義及衡量	15
表 3-2:樣本產業分布表	16
表 4-1:各變數之敘述性統計	17
表 4-2:各年度碳揭露分數平均分數	18
表 4-3:以產業別區分的碳揭露分數	18
表 4-4:各變數之間一般相關係數矩陣	19
表 4-5:2008至2015年碳揭露分數之Tobit截斷迴歸	23
表 4-6:2008至2010年碳揭露分數之Tobit截斷迴歸	25
表 4-7:2011至2015年碳揭露分數之Tobit截斷迴歸	27
表 4-8:假說結果彙整表	29
表 4-9:整體樣本不同期間影響碳揭露分數的效果彙總	30
表 4-10:子樣本不同期間影響碳揭露分數的效果彙總	31
參考文獻
英文文獻
Andrikopoulos, A. & Kriklani, N. (2013). Environmental disclosure and financial characteristics of the firm: the case of Denmark. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20(1), pp. 55–64.
Branco, M.C. & Rodrigues, L.L. (2008). Factors influencing social responsibility disclosure by Portuguese companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(4), pp. 685–701.
Busch, T. & Hoffmann, V.H. (2011). How hot is your bottom line? Linking carbon and financial performance. Business & Society, 50(2), pp. 233–265. 
Bushee, B.J. & Noe, C.F. (2000). Corporate disclosure practices, institutional investors, and stock return volatility. Journal of accounting research, 38, pp.171–202.
Calza, F., Profumo, G., & Tutore, I. (2014). Corporate ownership and environmental proactivity. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(6), pp. 369–389.
Cho, C.H. & Patten, D.M. (2007). The role of environmental disclosures as tools of legitimacy: A research note. Accounting, organizations and society, 32(7), pp. 639–647.
Choi, J.C. (1999). An investigation of the initial voluntary environmental disclosures made in Korean semi-annual financial reports. Pacific Accounting Review, 11(1), pp.73–102.
Clarkson, M.E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), pp. 92–117. 
Clarkson, P.M., Li, Y. & Richardson, G.D. (2004). The market valuation of environmental capital expenditures by pulp and paper companies. The Accounting Review, 79(2), pp. 329–353.
Clarkson, P.M., Li, Y., Richardson, G.D. & Vasvari, F.P. (2008). Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4-5), pp. 303–327.
Cotter, J. & Najah, M.M. (2012). Institutional investor influence on global climate change disclosure practices. Australian Journal of Management, 37(2), pp. 169–187. 
Davies, A. & Lahiri, K. (1995). A New Framework for Testing Rationality and Measuring Aggregate Shocks Using Panel Data. Journal of Econometrics, 68 (1): pp. 205–227.
Deegan, C. & Blomquist, C. (2006) .Stakeholder influence on corporate reporting: An exploration of the interaction between WWF-Australia and the Australian minerals industry. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(4-5), pp. 343–372.
Deegan, C. & Gordon, B. (1996). A study of the environmental disclosure practices of Australian corporations. Accounting and business research, 26(3), pp. 187–199. 
Eleftheriadis, I. M. & Anagnostopoulou, E. G. (2015). Relationship between corporate climate change disclosures and firm factors. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(8), pp. 780–789.
Guan, R., Zheng, H., Hu, J., Fang, Q., & Ren, R. (2017). The Higher Carbon Intensity of Loans, the Higher Non-Performing Loan Ratio: The Case of China. Sustainability, 9(4), pp. 667–683.
Guenster, N., Bauer, R., Derwall, J. & Koedijk, K. (2010) .The economic value of corporate Eco-Efficiency. European Financial Management, 17(4), pp. 679–704.
Guenther, E., Guenther, T., Schiemann, F. & Weber, G. (2016). Stakeholder Relevance for Reporting Explanatory Factors of Carbon Disclosure. Business & Society, 55(3), pp. 361–397.
Gonzalez-Gonzalez, J. M., & Zamora Ramírez, C. (2016). Voluntary carbon disclosure by Spanish companies: an empirical analysis. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 8(1), pp. 57–79.
Harmes, A. (2011). The limits of carbon disclosure: Theorizing the business case for investor environmentalism. Global Environmental Politics, 11(2), pp. 98–119.
Healy, P.M. & Palepu, K.G. (2001). Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1-3), pp. 405–440.
Herold, D. M., & Lee, K. H. (2017). The Influence of the Sustainability Logic on Carbon Disclosure in the Global Logistics Industry: The Case of DHL, FDX and UPS. Sustainability, 9(4), pp. 601–621.
Huang, C.L. & Kung, F.H. (2010). Drivers of environmental disclosure and Stakeholder expectation: Evidence from Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(3), pp. 435–451.
Johnston, D. (2005). An investigation of regulatory and voluntary environmental capital expenditures. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24(3), pp. 175–206. 
Kalu, J. U., Aliagha, G. U., & Buang, A. (2016). A Review of Economic Factors Influencing Voluntary Carbon Disclosure in the Property Sector of Developing Economies. Earth and Environmental Science, 30(1). 
Kalu, J. U., Buang, A., & Aliagha, G. U. (2016) .Determinants of voluntary carbon disclosure in the corporate real estate sector of Malaysia. Journal of Environmental Management, 182, pp. 519–524.
Kent, P. & Zunker, T. (2015). A stakeholder analysis of employee disclosures in annual reports. Accounting & Finance. doi: 10.1111/acfi.12153
Khanna, M. & Damon, L. A. (1999). EPA's voluntary 33/50 program: Impact on toxic releases and economic performance of firms. Journal of environmental economics and management, 37(1), pp. 1–25.
Kolk, A. & Pinkse, J. (2008). A perspective on multinational enterprises and climate change: Learning from “an inconvenient truth?. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(8), pp. 1359–1378.
Leftwich, R.W., Watts, R.L. & Zimmerman, J.L. (1981). Voluntary corporate disclosure: The case of interim reporting. Journal of Accounting Research, 19, pp. 50–77.
Li, L., He, X., & Liu, D. (2017). Influencing Factors for Carbon Information Disclosure of Chinese Listed Companies Based on Network Media Data. In Information Technology and Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2, pp. 23–30. 
Luo, L. (2017). The influence of institutional contexts on the relationship between voluntary carbon disclosure and carbon emission performance. Accounting & Finance. doi: 10.1111/acfi.12267
Luo, L., Lan, Y. C., & Tang, Q. (2012). Corporate incentives to disclose carbon information: Evidence from the CDP Global 500 report. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 23(2), pp. 93–120.
Luo, L., Lan, Y. C., & Tang, Q. (2013). Comparison of propensity for carbon disclosure between developing and developed countries. Accounting Research Journal 26(1), pp. 6–34.
Mellahi, K., Frynas, J.G., Sun, P. & Siegel, D. (2015). A review of the Nonmarket strategy literature: Toward a multi-theoretical integration. Journal of Management, 42(1) pp. 143–173. 
Nilsson, M., Varnäs, A., Kehler Siebert, C., Nilsson, L. J., Nykvist, B., & Ericsson, K. (2009). A European eco-efficient economy: governing climate, energy and competitiveness: report for the 2009 Swedish Presidency of the Council of the European. Retrieved from http://www.sei.se/mediamanager/documents/Publications/Policy-institutions/europeanecoefficienteconomyfinal.pdf.
O’Donovan, G. (2002). Environmental disclosures in the annual report: Extending the applicability and predictive power of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 344-371.
Passetti, E., & Tenucci, A. (2016). Eco-efficiency measurement and the influence of organisational factors: evidence from large Italian companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 122, pp.228-239.
Patten, D. M. (1991). Exposure, Legitimacy, and Social Disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 10(4), pp. 297–308.
Reid, E.M. & Toffel, M.W. (2009). Responding to public and private politics: Corporate disclosure of climate change strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 30(11), pp. 1157–1178.
Roberts, R.W. (1992). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: An application of stakeholder theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(6), pp. 595–612.
SustainAbility. (2012) Rate the raters, Phase Five: Polling the experts. Retrieved from
http://www.sustainability.com/library/rate-the-raters-phase-fivepolling-the-experts-2012#.UIK1QYbmGVE.
Thurner, T. W., & Roud, V. (2016). Greening strategies in Russia's manufacturing–from compliance to opportunity. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, pp. 2851-2860.
Ullmann, A. A. (1985). Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance of US firms. Academy of management review, 10(3), pp. 540–557.
Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic management journal, 18(4), pp. 303-319.
Wang, L., & Zhu, Y. (2017). Green Credit Policy and the Maturity of Corporate Debt. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management, pp. 1709–1717.
Wang, W. K., Lu, W. M. & Wang, S. W. (2014). The impact of environmental expenditures on performance in the U.S. Chemical industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 64, pp. 447–456.
Weber, M. (2009). The theory of social and economic organization. US: Simon and Schuster. 
Wegener, M., Elayan, F.A., Felton, S. & Li, J. (2013). Factors influencing corporate environmental disclosures. Accounting Perspectives, 12(1), pp. 53–73.
Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), pp. 171–180.
Yook, K. H., Song, H., Patten, D. M., & Kim, I. W. (2017). The Disclosure of Environmental Conservation Costs and Its Relation to Eco-efficiency: Evidence from Japan. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 8(1), pp. 20–42.
網站資料
CDP, (2015) S&P 500 Climate Change Report. Available from:https://www.cdp.net/en-US/Pages/HomePage.aspx
KPMG, (2017) 2017年 KPMG CEO 前瞻大調查. Available from:https://home.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/tw/pdf/2017/06/2017-global-ceo-outlook-tw-zh.pdf
論文全文使用權限
校內
紙本論文於授權書繳交後5年公開
同意電子論文全文授權校園內公開
校內電子論文於授權書繳交後5年公開
校外
同意授權
校外電子論文於授權書繳交後5年公開

如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信