淡江大學覺生紀念圖書館 (TKU Library)
進階搜尋


下載電子全文限經由淡江IP使用) 
系統識別號 U0002-1506200914032300
中文論文名稱 非典型品牌延伸方法對延伸產品知覺價值之研究
英文論文名稱 A Study of Atypical Brand Extension on Perceived Value
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中) 企業管理學系碩士班
系所名稱(英) Department of Business Administration
學年度 97
學期 2
出版年 98
研究生中文姓名 潘裕傑
研究生英文姓名 Yu-Chieh Pan
學號 696610731
學位類別 碩士
語文別 中文
口試日期 2009-05-26
論文頁數 104頁
口試委員 指導教授-李月華
委員-吳長生
委員-黃曼琴
中文關鍵字 品牌延伸  非典型品牌延伸  知覺品質  知覺價值 
英文關鍵字 Brand Extension  AtypicalBrand Extension  Perceived Quality  Perceived Value 
學科別分類 學科別社會科學管理學
中文摘要 品牌延伸發展至今在學術上已有許多的貢獻並且在實務上也一直不斷的被運用。在學術上最重要的結論為當原品牌與計劃延伸的相似性和配合度愈高,則延伸成功的可能性較高,此種常見的品牌延伸即為典型品牌延伸。但對於企業而言,建立品牌是相當困難以及高風險,當企業欲跨足相似性較低的產品類別時是否可運用以建立的品牌。因此當原品牌延伸至相似性低的產品類別時即為非典型品牌延伸。對於非典型品牌延伸而言,並非所有品牌皆能運用品牌延伸,若原品牌知覺品質太低則延伸的成效將不會太好;但對於高品質品牌而言,強烈的品牌核心價值使否影響非典型延伸的成效?因此誘發本研究動機。本研究將會利用直接延伸、序列性延伸、複合延伸,此三種不同的品牌延伸方式並納入原品牌的知覺品質,針對非典型品牌延伸進行探討。
本研究主要探討在非典型品牌延伸下,品牌延伸方式及原品牌知覺品質對延伸新產品知覺價值的影響。本研究應用實驗設計來檢定假說,為3 (品牌延伸方式) x 2 (原品牌知覺品質) 的實驗,有240位受測者參與本實驗。研究顯示消費者對於非典型延伸新產品的知覺價值,均受到品牌延伸方式與原品牌知覺品質的影響,且品牌延伸方式的效果大於原品牌知覺品質。研究結果可提供廠商做為非典型品牌延伸時的參考。
英文摘要 The brand extension in development so far was a lot of contributions to academy and application on the practice all the time. The most important of conclusion on academy is that core brand more similar and fitter with proposed extension which probability of successful extension was higher. So, common brand extension is typical brand extension. But for company, it is quite difficult and high risk to build a brand. When company want to dabble at product categories which dissimilar with core products if use built brand. So, it is atypical brand extension when core brand extend to dissimilar product categories. For typical brand extension, not all brands can use brand extension if perceived quality of core brand is too low to a bad extension; For high quality brand, the strong brand core values do affect the atypical extension result? So it is causing the research motive. The research will use three extension ways included direct brand extension, sequential brand extension, composite brand extension and join the perceived quality of core brand to confer atypical brand extension.
The research of atypical brand extension, focus on brand extension ways and perceived quality of core brand to affect perceived value of new extension product. An experimental research design was applied for testing the set of hypotheses put forth. It is a 3 (brand extension ways) x 2 (perceived quality of core brand, high vs. average) experiment, a total of 240 respondents participated in the study. The study indicates brand extension ways and perceived quality of core brand will affect perceived value new extension product to consumers, brand extension ways more effective than perceived quality of core brand. When company implement atypical brand extension in accordance with the study conclusion.
論文目次 目錄
目錄......................................................I
表目錄..................................................III
圖目錄....................................................V
第壹章 緒論...............................................1
第一節 研究背景與動機.....................................1
第二節 研究目的...........................................4
第三節 研究流程...........................................5
第貳章 文獻探討...........................................7
第一節 品牌延伸...........................................7
第二節 複合品牌延伸......................................14
第三節 品質與知覺品質....................................18
第四節 知覺價值..........................................23
第參章 研究方法..........................................27
第一節 研究架構與假設....................................27
第二節 變數定義與衡量....................................31
第三節 研究設計..........................................34
第四節 實驗流程與正式問卷設計............................39
第五節 資料分析方法......................................40
第肆章 資料分析..........................................42
第一節 敘述性統計分析....................................42
第二節 信度與效度分析....................................46
第三節 實驗相關檢定......................................48
第四節 實驗假說檢定......................................56
第伍章 結論與建議........................................67
第一節 研究結論..........................................67
第二節 管理意涵..........................................70
第三節 研究限制與後續研究建議............................72
參考文獻..................................................73
附件:前測與正式問卷.....................................78
附件A.....................................................78
附件B.....................................................79
附件C.....................................................81
附件D.....................................................84
附件E.....................................................87
附件F.....................................................88
正式問卷..................................................89

表目錄
表 3-1  知覺價值衡量問項.................................32
表 3-2  知覺品質衡量問項.................................33
表 4-1 人口變數樣本結構.................................42
表 4-2 變數敘述性統計量.................................43
表 4-3 瑞穗與福樂之控制變數敘述性統計量.................44
表 4-4 序列延伸與複合延伸之控制變數敘述性統計量.........45
表 4-5 正式問卷之信度檢驗...............................46
表 4-6 正式問卷之效度檢驗...............................47
表 4-7 鮮乳與高鈣麥片相似度同質性檢定...................48
表 4-8 瑞穗各控制變數同質性檢定.........................48
表 4-9 福樂各控制變數同質性檢定.........................49
表 4-10 序列延伸各控制變數同質性檢定.....................50
表 4-11 複合延伸各控制變數同質性檢定.....................50
表 4-12 非典型延伸程度操弄檢定...........................51
表 4-13 瑞穗各控制變數操弄檢定...........................51
表 4-14 福樂各控制變數操弄檢定...........................52
表 4-15 序列延伸各控制變數操弄檢定.......................53
表 4-16 複合延伸各控制變數操弄檢定.......................53
表 4-17 共變量與依變數及自變數知檢定...........;.........54
表 4-18 共變量相關性檢定.................................54
表 4-19 各組知覺價值K-S常態性檢定........................55
表 4-20 二因子ANCOVA分析.................................56
表 4-21 品牌延伸方式ANCOVA分析...........................57
表 4-22 品牌延伸方式之成對比較...........................57
表 4-23 品牌延伸方式對知覺價值影響之假說檢定表...........58
表 4-24 原品牌知覺品質ANCOVA分析.........................58
表 4-25 原品牌知覺品質之成對比較.........................58
表 4-26 原品牌知覺品質對知覺價值影響之假說檢定表.........59
表 4-27 品牌延伸方式ANCOVA分析 (瑞穗)....................60
表 4-28 各品牌延伸方式之成對比較 (瑞穗)..................60
表 4-29 品牌延伸方式ANCOVA分析 (福樂)....................61
表 4-30 各品牌延伸方式之成對比較 (福樂)..................61
表 4-31 原品牌知覺品質ANCOVA分析 (直接延伸)..............62
表 4-32 原品牌知覺品質之成對比較 (直接延伸)..............63
表 4-33 原品牌知覺品質ANCOVA分析 (序列延伸)..............63
表 4-34 原品牌知覺品質之成對比較 (序列延伸)..............63
表 4-35 原品牌知覺品質ANCOVA分析 (複合延伸)..............64
表 4-36 原品牌知覺品質之成對比較 (複合延伸)..............64
表 4-37 原品牌品質水準在不同延伸方式中干擾之假說檢定表...65

圖目錄
圖 1-1 研究流程圖.........................................6
圖 2-1 Kotler品牌策略.....................................8
圖 2-2 品牌聯盟形式之連續帶..............................16
圖 2-3 品牌聯盟的外溢效果................................17
圖 2-4 知覺品質組成圖....................................20
圖 2-5 交易效用理論概念圖................................23
圖 2-6 知覺價值之組成構面................................26
圖 3-1 研究架構圖........................................28
圖 4-1 原品牌知覺品質與品牌延伸方式之交互作用圖..........59
圖 4-2 二品質組別下各延伸方式的知覺價值比較圖............62
圖 4-3 各品牌延伸方式下二品牌的知覺價值比較圖............65
參考文獻 參考文獻
一、中文部分
1.徐榮國 (2005) ,品牌延伸策略影響消費者購買延伸產品知覺價值之研究,淡江大學企業管理學系研究所碩士論文。

2.大前研一 (2005)。全球舞台大未來。臺灣:台商圖書出版。

3.陳佩秀譯 (2001)。Mariotti J.著。品牌。臺灣:遠流圖書出版。

二、英文部分
1.Aaker, David A. (1990). Brand Extension: The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly. Sloan Management Review, 31(4), 47-56.

2.Aaker and Keller, K.L. (1990). Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extensions. Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 27-41.

3.Aaker, David A. (1996). Building Strong Brand, New York: The Free Press.

4.Aaker, David A. and Joachimsthaler, Erich (2000). The Brand Relationship Spectrum: The Key to The Brand Architecture Challenge. California Management Review, 42(4), 8-20.

5.Anderson, E. W. and Sullivan, M. W. (1993). The antecedents and consequences of customer satisfaction for firms. Marketing Science, 12(2), 125-143.
6.Boush, D.M., Shannon Shipp, Barbara Loken, Ezra Gencturk, Susan Crockett, Ellen Kennedy, Betty Minshall, Dennis Misurell, Linda Rochford, and Jon Strobel (1987, Fall). Affect Generalization to Similar and Dissimilar Brand Extensions. Psychology and Marketing, 4, 225-237.

7.Boush, David M. and Barbara Loken (1991, February). A Process Tracing Study of Brand Extension Evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 28, 16-28.

8.Burke, R.R.,Oliva, T.A. and Rangaswamy, A. (1993). Brand Equity and Brand Names. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 10, 61-75.

9.Broniarczyk, Susan M. and Joseph W. Alba (1994, May). The Importance of the Brand in Brand Extension. Journal of Marketing Research, 31, 214-28.

10.Barone, M.J., Miniard, P.W.,and Romeo,J.B. (2000). The Influence of Positive Mood on Brand Extension Evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 26 (4), 387-402.

11.Balachander Subramanian, Ghose Sanjoy (2003). Reciprocal spillover effects: a strategic benefit of brand extensions. Journal of Marketing, 67(1), 4-13.

12.Cooke, S. and P. Ryan (2000). Brand Alliances: From Reputation Endorsement to Collaboration on Core Competencies. Irish Marketing Review, 13(2), 36-41.

13.Cronin, J. J., Brady, M. K., & Hult, G. T. M. (2000). Assessing the Effects of Quality, Value, and Customer Satisfaction on Consumer Behavioral Intentions in Service Environments. Journal of Retailing, 76(2), 193-218.

14.Cortinas, M., Elorz, M. and Mugica, J.E. (2008). The use of loyalty cards databases: difference in regular price and discount sensitivity in the brand choice between card and non-card holders. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 15(1), 42-51.

15.Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Gerwal, D. (1991). Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers' Product Evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3). 307-319.

16.Dacin, Peter A. and Daniel C. Smith (1994). The Effect of Brand Portfolio Characteristics on Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extensions. Journal of Marketing Research, (31). 229-242.

17.Doney, P.M. & Cannon, J.P. (1997). An examination of the nature of trust in buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, (61). 35-51.

18.Erickson, Gary M., Johny K. Johansson, and Paul Chao (1984). Image Variables in Multi-Attribute Product Evaluations: Country-of-Origin Effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(2), 694-699.

19.Erdem, T. (1998). An Empirical Analysis of Umbrella Branding. Journal of Marketing Research, 35, 339-351.

20.Fornell, C., Johnson, M. D., Anderson, E. W., Cha, J., & Bryant, B. E. (1996). The American Customer Satisfaction Index: Nature, Purpose, and Findings. Journal of Marketing, 60. 7-18.

21.Gamble, T.R. (1967). Brand Extension in Plotting Marketing Strategy, Lee Adler, ed., New York:Simon and Schuster, 167-178.

22.Garvin, D.A. (1984). What does Product Quality Really Means. Sloan Management Review, 25-43.

23.Guiltinan J. P. (1987). The Price Bundling of Services: A Normative Framework. Journal of Marketing, 51(2), 74-85.

24.Grewal, D., Monroe, K. B., and Krishnan, R. (1998). The effects of price-comparisons advertising on buyers' perceptions of acquisition value, transaction value, andbehavioral intentions. Journal of Marketing, 62(2), 46-59.

25.Holbrook, M. B. and K. P. Corfman (1985). “Quality and Value in the Consumption Experience: Phaedrus Riders Again” in Perceived Quality: J. Jacoby and J. Olson, eds. Lexington, MA Lexington Books, pp.31-57.

26.Hellier, P. K., Geursen, G. M., Carr, R. A., & Rickard, J. A. (2003). Customer repurchase intention: A general structural equation model. European Journal of Marketing, 37(11/12), 1762-1800.

27.Keller, Kevin L. and D. A. Aaker (1992). The Effect of Sequential Introduction of Brand Extension. Journal of Marketing Research, 29(1), 35-50.

28.Keller, Kevin Lane (1993). Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity. Journal of Marketing, Chicago, 57(1), 1-23.

29.Keller, K.L. (1998). Strategic Brand Management: Building Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Practice Hall.

30.Kotler, Philip (1994). Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning Implementation,and Control 9th ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall International, Inc.

31.Kotler, P. (2003). Marketing Management, 11th ed. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

32.Laurent, G. & J. Kapferer. (1985). Measuring consumer involvement profiles. Journal of Marketing Research, 22, 41-53.

33.Lassar, W., Mittaal, B., and Sharma, A. (1995). Measuring customer-based brand equity. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 12(4), 11-19.

34.Leszinski, R. and Marn, M.V. (1997). “Setting Value, not Price,” The Mckinsey Quarterly, 1, pp. 99-115.

35.Lapierre, J. (2000). Customer-perceived value in industrial contexts. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 15(2/3), 122-140.

36.Low, G. S. and Lamb, C. W. (2000). The measurement and dimensionality of brand associations. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 9(6), 350-368.

37.Meyers-Levy, Joan, & Alice M. Tybout, (1989). Schema Congruity as a Basis for Product Evaluayion. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 39-54.

38.Muthukrishnan, A. V. and B. A. Weitz (1991). Role of Product Knowledge in Evaluationof Brand Extension. Advances in Consumer Research, 18(1), 407-413.

39.Milewicz, J. and Herbig, P. (1994). Evaluating the brand extension decision using a model of reputation building. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 3(1), 39-47.

40.Maoz, E., and Tybout, A. M. (2002). Similarity and the Moderating Role of Involvement in the Evaluation of Brand Extensions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(2), 119-132.

41.Milberg, S.J. and Sinn, F. (2007). Vulnerability of global brands to negative feedback effects. Journal of Business Research, 45(6), 6-39.

42.Olson, J. C., & Jacoby, J. (1974). Intrinsic versus extrinsic cues as determinants of perceived product quality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59-74.

43.Olshavsky, Richard N. and John A. Miller (1972). Consumer Expectations, Product Performance, and Perceived Product Quality. Journal of Marketing Research, 1(9), 19-21.

44.Park, C.W., Jaworski, B.J. and MacInnis, D.J. (1986). Strategic brand concept-image management. Journal of Marketing, 50(10), 135-45.

45.Park, C. W., S. Milberg and R. Lawson (1991). Evaluation of Brand Extension: The Role of Product Level Similarity and Brand Concept Consistency. Journal of Consumer Research, 18(9), 185-193.

46.Park, C.W., S.Y. Junk, and A.D. Shocker (1996). Composite Branding Alliance: An Investigation of Extension and Feedback Effect. Journal of Marketing Research, 33(11), 453-466.

47.Pethmann, B., & Benezra, K. (1994). Co-brand or be damned. Brandweek, 35(45), 20-25.

48.Parasuraman, A. and Grewal, D. (2000). The impact of technology on the quality-value-loyalty chain: A research agenda. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(1), 168-174.

49.Rao, Akshay R. and Ruekert, Robert W. (1994). Brand Alliances as Signals of Product Quality. Sloan Management Review, 87-97.

50.Reddy, Srinivas K., Susan L. Holak, & Bhat, S. (1994). To extend or not to extend: Success determinants of line extensions. Journal of Marketing Research, 31(May), 243-262.

51.Rodrigue C. S. and Biswas A. (2004). Brand Alliance Dependency and Exclusivity: an Empirical Investigation. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 13(7), 477-478.

52.Simonin, B. L, and J. A. Ruth. (1995). Bundling as a strategy for new product introduction: Effects on consumers' reservation prices for the bundle, the new product, and its tie-in. Journal of Business Research, 33(3), 219-230.

53.Simonin B. L. and J. A. Ruth (1998). Is a Company Known by the Company It Keeps? Assessing the Spillover Effects of Brand Alliances on Consumer Brand Attitudes. Journal of Marketing Research, 35(1), 30-42.

54.Sheth, J. N., Newman, B. I., & Gross, B. L. (1991). Why We Buy What We Buy: A Theory of Consumption Value. Journal of Business Research, 22, 159-170.

55.Smith, D. C. and C. W. Park (1992). The Effects of Brand Extensions on Market Share Advertising Efficiency. Journal of Marketing Research, 29(3), 296-313.

56.Sunde, Lorraine and Roderick, J.B. (1993). Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extensions:Further Empirical Results. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 10(March), 47-53.

57.Spethman, B. and Benezra, K. (1994). Co-brand or be damned. Brandweek, 1(45), 21-4.

58.Shocker, A.D., Srivastava, R.K. & Ruekert, R.W. (1994). Challenges and Opportunities Facing Brand Management: An Introduction to the Special Issue. Journal of Marketing Research, 149-158.

59.Supphellen, M., Eismann, Ø. and Hem, L. (2004). Can advertisements for brand extensions revitalize flagship products? An experiment. International Journal of Advertising, 23(2), 173-96.

60.Tauber E.M. (1981). Brand Franchise Extension: New Product Benefits From Existing Brand Names, Business Horizons, 24, 36-41.

61.Tauber, Edward M. (1988). Brand Leverage: Strategy for Growth in A Cost-Control World. Journal of Advertising Research, Aug/Sep, 26-37.

62.Thaler, Richard (1985). Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice. Marketing Science, 4, 199-244.

63.Taylor Valerie A, Bearden William O. (2003). Ad spending on brand extensions: does similarity matter? Journal of Brand Management, 11(1), 63–74.

64.Visser, E. (1998). Multibranding: Symptom of an Unclear Branding Policy. Design Management Journal, 60-64.

65.Woodruff, Robert B. and Gardial, S. (1996). Know Your Customer: New Approaches to Understanding Customer Value and Satisfaction, Blackwell, Oxford.

66.Wernerfelt B. (1988). Umbrella Branding as a Signal of New product Quality: A Example of Signaling by Posting a Bond. Rand Journal of Economics, 19, 48-466.

67.Washburn Judith H. et al. (2004). Brand alliance and customer-based brand equity effects. Psychology and Marketing, 21, 487-508.

68.Young, S. and B. Feigin (1975). Using the Benefit Chain for Improved Strategy Formulation. Journal of Marketing, 39(July), 72-74.

69.Zeithaml, Valarie A. (1988). Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52, 2-22.

70.Zeithaml, Valarie A. and Amna Kirmani (1993). Advertising, Perceived Quality, and Brand Image, Iowa City: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 143-161.
論文使用權限
  • 同意紙本無償授權給館內讀者為學術之目的重製使用,於2009-06-19公開。
  • 同意授權瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2009-06-19起公開。


  • 若您有任何疑問,請與我們聯絡!
    圖書館: 請來電 (02)2621-5656 轉 2281 或 來信