系統識別號 | U0002-1502200615372700 |
---|---|
DOI | 10.6846/TKU.2006.00384 |
論文名稱(中文) | 股價與匯率之非線性關係研究─台灣、日本和韓國實證 |
論文名稱(英文) | Nonlinearities in the Stock Price and Exchange Rate: Evidence from the Taiwan, Japan and South Korea |
第三語言論文名稱 | |
校院名稱 | 淡江大學 |
系所名稱(中文) | 財務金融學系碩士在職專班 |
系所名稱(英文) | Department of Banking and Finance |
外國學位學校名稱 | |
外國學位學院名稱 | |
外國學位研究所名稱 | |
學年度 | 94 |
學期 | 1 |
出版年 | 95 |
研究生(中文) | 朱明偉 |
研究生(英文) | Ming-Wei Chu |
學號 | 792490335 |
學位類別 | 碩士 |
語言別 | 繁體中文 |
第二語言別 | |
口試日期 | 2005-12-23 |
論文頁數 | 73頁 |
口試委員 |
指導教授
-
聶建中(niehcc@mail.tku.edu.tw)
共同指導教授 - 莊孟翰(017438@mail.tku.edu.tw) 委員 - 沈中華(chshen@nccu.edu.tw) 委員 - 謝劍平(joseph@megaholdings.com.tw) 委員 - 韋伯韜(duanwei@mail.tku.edu.tw) |
關鍵字(中) |
門檻自我迴歸模型 門檻誤差修正模型 多變量非對稱GARCH |
關鍵字(英) |
Threshold Autoregressive Model Threshold Error-Correction Model Multivariate Asymmetric GARCH Model |
第三語言關鍵字 | |
學科別分類 | |
中文摘要 |
隨著而近年來國際資金佔亞洲資本市場比重日益攀升,亞洲各國股市及匯市彼此間的連動性勢必日趨緊密。本文以1996/1/1至2005/8/31期間,台灣日本韓國三國間的股市與匯市報酬進行實證。利用Enders and Granger(1998)門檻自我回歸模型(TAR)及動差門檻自我回歸模型(MTAR)檢定不對稱均衡關係是否存在。並利用Enders and Siklos (2001)門檻自我回歸共整檢定找出不對稱共整關係,透過不對稱共整合模型來捕捉報酬長短期互動關係。考慮條件變異數異質性、波動叢聚及波動非對稱性下,本文利用Kroner and Ng (1998)多變量非對稱GARCH模型以捕捉波動性外溢關係,探討跨國跨市場間的波動互動關係。實證結果發現,股匯市關係上,報酬呈現雙向外溢關係,股市報酬同向領先匯市,股匯市波動外溢存在且具有不對稱性。在跨國股市關係上,本文發現南韓對台灣及日本報酬外溢及波動外溢最為顯著,且波動存在不對稱效果。在跨國匯市關係上,日本及韓國均對台灣具有報酬外溢,台灣、日本與南韓匯市波動彼此連動性相當顯著。 |
英文摘要 |
As foreign direct investment expanding steadily in Asian equity market, the relationships between stock market and exchange market are more and more closely. This paper empirically tests the relationships between stock index and exchange rate in Taiwan, South Korea and Japan during 1996 to 2005. We use Threshold Autoregressive Model, Momentum-Threshold Autoregressive Model, Threshold Error-Correction Model and Multivariate Asymmetric GARCH Model as methodology in this paper. Empirical analysis shows that feedback causality relationships between stock index and exchange rate exist in Taiwan and Japan. Indeed, in Taiwan, Japan and South Korea, stock index returns are positively Granger-cause to the exchange rate appreciation and volatility spillovers have asymmetric effect. The results highlight return spillovers and asymmetric volatility spillovers in stock market form South Korea to Taiwan and Japan. The results also support that Japan Yen dominates Asian exchange market and the linkage among Taiwan, Japan and South Korea is significantly strong. |
第三語言摘要 | |
論文目次 |
目錄 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究目的及動機 1 第二節 研究架構 4 第二章 文獻回顧 5 第一節 單一國家股匯市間外溢效果 5 第二節 跨國股市間外溢效果 8 第三節 跨國匯市間外溢效果 11 第三章 研究方法 15 第一節 單根檢定 15 一、 Augmented Dickey-Fuller單根檢定 16 二、 Phillips-Perron單根檢定 16 三、 Kwiatkowski, Phillips, Schmidt and Shin單根檢定 17 四、 Kapetanios, Shin and Snell單根檢定 18 第二節 共整合檢定 19 一、 Engle and Granger二階段共整合分析法 19 二、 Johansen共整合分析法 19 第三節 門檻自我迴歸模型 20 第四節 向量自我迴歸模型 21 第五節 向量門檻誤差修正模型 22 第六節 門檻共整合非對稱GARCH模型 23 一、 ARCH模型 23 二、 ARCH模型檢定 24 三、 GARCH模型 25 四、 多變量GARCH模型 25 五、 條件變異數不對性檢定 27 六、 多變量非對稱GARCH模型 28 七、 門檻共整合非對稱GARCH模型 29 第四章 實證結果分析 32 第一節 資料來源與資料處理 32 第二節 資料基本特性 32 第三節 單根檢定 34 第四節 門檻共整合檢定 35 一、 單一國家股匯市模型門檻共整合檢定 35 二、 跨國股市模型門檻共整合檢定 36 三、 跨國匯市模型門檻共整合檢定 37 第五節 ARCH模型檢定及條件變異非對稱性診斷檢定 38 一、 單一國家股匯市模型檢定 38 二、 跨國股市模型檢定 39 三、 跨國匯市模型檢定 40 第六節 門檻共整合非對稱GARCH模型估計及檢定 41 一、 單一國家股匯市模型 41 二、 跨國股市模型 45 三、 跨國匯市模型 49 第七節 門檻共整合非對稱GARCH模型檢定 53 一、 單一國家股匯市模型檢定 53 二、 跨國股市模型檢定 54 三、 跨國匯市模型檢定 55 第五章 結論與建議 57 第一節 實證結果歸納 57 第二節 結論 59 第三節 建議 61 第六章 附圖 62 第七章 參考文獻 64 第一節 中文部分 64 第二節 英文部分 66 表目錄 表1. 台灣、日本及南韓三國股市與匯市報酬敘述統計資料彙總 33 表2. 台灣、日本及南韓三國股價指數與即期匯率單根檢定 35 表3. 台灣、日本及南韓三國股匯市門檻共整合檢定 36 表4. 台灣、日本及南韓三國跨國股市門檻共整合檢定 37 表5. 台灣、日本及南韓三國跨國匯市門檻共整合檢定 37 表6. 台灣、日本及南韓三國股匯市VTECM模型檢定 39 表7. 台灣、日本及南韓三國跨國股市VTECM模型檢定 40 表8. 台灣、日本及南韓三國跨國匯市VTECM模型檢定 41 表9. 台灣、日本及南韓三國股匯市VTECM-AGARCH模型參數估計 44 表10. 台灣、日本及南韓三國股匯市VTECM-AGARCH模型假設檢定 45 表11. 台灣、日本及南韓跨國股市VTECM-AGARCH模型參數估計 48 表12. 台灣、日本及南韓跨國股市VTECM-AGARCH模型假設檢定 49 表13. 台灣、日本及南韓跨國匯市VTECM-AGARCH模型參數估計 52 表14. 台灣、日本及南韓跨國匯市VTECM-AGARCH模型假設檢定 53 表15. 台灣、日本及南韓三國股匯市VTECM-AGARCH模型檢定 54 表16. 台灣、日本及南韓跨國股市VTECM-AGARCH模型檢定 55 表17. 台灣、日本及南韓跨國匯市VTECM-AGARCH模型檢定 56 圖目錄 圖表 1 研究架構流程圖 4 圖表 2 台灣、日本及韓國股價指數與匯率走勢圖 62 圖表 3 台灣、日本及韓國股價指數報酬與匯率報酬走勢圖 62 圖表 4 台灣、日本及韓國股價指數報酬與匯率報酬門檻值 63 |
參考文獻 |
中文部分 1. 王甡(1995),「報酬衝擊對條件波動所造成之非對稱效果─台灣股票市場之實證分析」,證券市場發展季刊,第七卷第一期,125-160。 2. 王毓敏(1998),「台灣地區股票市場與外匯市場間報酬與波動性外溢效果之研究」,台北銀行月刊,第二十八卷第十二期,159-171。 3. 王麗惠、王麗梅與金寶玲(2001),「台灣與東南亞四小虎及其外匯市場波動性與外溢效果之研究」,致理學報,14 期,27~48。 4. 方文碩(2001),「匯率貶值對股票市場的衝擊─雙變量GARCH模型」,台灣金融財務季刊,第二輯,第三期,99-117。 5. 江智德(1998),「國際資本市場互動關係之研究:GARCH模型之應用」,國立台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文。 6. 李碧純(1997),「亞洲各國股匯市波動之傳遞效果─金融風暴前後之探討」,國立中央大學財務管理研究所碩士論文。 7. 沈中華與陳建福(2004),「B股開放政策對中國大陸股票市場效率性有影響嗎?不對稱門檻共整合模型的應用」,財務金融學刊,11,89-119。 8. 吳宗隆與徐清俊(2003),「台股市場與外匯市場報酬與波動關聯性研究-雙變量GJR-GARCH(1,1)-M模型之應用」,遠東學報,第二十卷,第四期,799-816。 9. 邱建良、吳佩珊與邱哲修 (2004),「亞洲外匯市場行為之探討–不對稱門檻GARCH模型之應用」,台灣管理學刊,第4卷,第2期,187-202。 10. 邱哲修、邱建良與蘇英谷(2001),「台灣匯率波動對股價報酬之影響」,企銀季刊,第24輯,第4期,131-147。 11. 胥愛琦、吳清豐(2003),「台灣股價報酬與匯率變動之波動性外溢效果-雙變量EGARCH模型的應用」,台灣金融財務季刊,第四輯,第三期,87-103。 12. 康信鴻、溫晉慶(2000),「東亞各訴外資股價指數與匯率相關性」,台灣經濟金融月刊,第三十六卷第八期,34-48。 13. 陳君達(2000),「價格變動與國際股市波動相關性之研究」,私立淡江大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。 14. 陳榮昌(2002),「匯率與股價報酬間外溢效果之多國分析」,國立雲林科技大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。 15. 黃姿榮(1996),「臺灣地區匯率與股價關係之實證研究」,私立淡江大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。 16. 葉輔錩(1997),「台灣與主要貿易國即期匯率間之研究-多變數共整合模型分析」,淡江大學財務金融學系碩士論文。 17. 詹家仁(2003),「台北外匯市場美元/新台幣匯率波動行為之研究-以EGARCH模型為實證」,國立雲林科技大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。 18. 鄭如芳(2000),「股市、匯市報酬及波動性之外溢效果分析」,私立淡江大學國際貿易學研究所碩士論文。 19. 劉邦彥 (2004),「股價與匯價非線性關係之探討:以台灣及南韓為例」,逢甲大學經濟學系碩士論文。 20. 劉祥熹與李崇主(2000),「台灣地區外資、匯率與股價關聯性之研究-VAR 與VECM 之應用」,證券市場發展季刊,第47 期,1-39。 英文部分 1. Ajayi, R. A. and M. Mougoue (1996), “On the Dynamic Relation Between Stock Price and Exchange Rates,” The Journal of Financial Research, 2, 193-207. 2. Balke, N. S. and Fomby, T. (1997), “Threshold cointegration,” International Economic Review, 38, 624-643. 3. Berndt, E. K., B. H. Hall, R. E. Hall and J. A. Hausman (1974), “Estimation and Inference in Nonlinear Structural Models,” Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, 4, 653-665. 4. Bollerslev, T. (1986), “Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity,” Journal of Econometrics, 31, 307-327. 5. Baillie, R. T. and T. Bollerslev (1989), “Common Stochastic Trends in a System of Exchange Rates,” Journal of Finance, 167-181. 6. Bollerslev, T. (1990), “Modeling the coherence in short-run nominal exchange rates: A multivariate generalized ARCH approach,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 72, 498-505. 7. Bollerslev, T., R. P. Chou and K. F. Kroner (1992), “ARCH Modeling in Finance: A Review of the Theory and Empirical Evidence,” Journal of Econometrics, 52, 5-59. 8. Campbell, J.Y. and P. Perron (1991), “Pitfalls and opportunities: what macroeconomists should know about unit roots,” NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 141-201. 9. Chan, K.S. (1993), “Consistency and Limiting Distribution of the Least Squares Estimator of a Threshold Autoregressive Model,” The Annals of Statistics, 21, 520-533. 10. Chang, Tsangyao and Chien-Chung Nieh (2001), “International Transmission of Stock Price Movements among Taiwan and Its Trading Partners: Hong Kong, Japan and the United States,” Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies, 4(4), 379-401 11. Dejong, K. N., Nankervis, J. C. Savin, N.E. and Whiteman, C. H. (1992), “Intergration Versus Stationarity in the Time Series,” Econometrica, 60(2), 423-433. 12. Dickey, D. A. and Fuller, W. A. (1979), “Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregression Time Series with a Unit Root,“ Journal of American Statistical Association, 74, 427-432. 13. Dickey, D. A. and Fuller, W. A. (1981), “Likelihood Ratio Statistics for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root” Econometrica, Vol.49, No.4, 1057-1072. 14. Doldado, J., T. Jenkinson, and S. Sosvilla-Rivero (1990), “Co-integration and Unit Roots,” Journal of Economic Surveys, 4, 249-273. 15. Enders, W. and C. W. J. Granger (1998) “Unit-root tests and asymmertric adjustment with an example using the term structure of interest rates,” Journal of Business Economics & Statistics, 16, 304-311. 16. Enders, W. and P. L. Siklos (2001) “Cointegration and Threshold Adjustment,” Journal of Business Economics & Statistics, 19, 166-167. 17. Engle, Robert and C. W. J. Granger (1987) “Cointegration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing,” Econometrica, 55, 251-276. 18. Engle, R. F. (1982), “Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of UK Inflation,” Econometrica, 55, 987-1008. 19. Engle, R. F. and B. S. Yoo (1987), “Forecasting and Testing in Cointegrated Systems”, Journal of Econometrics .35, 143-159. 20. Engle, R. F. and C. W. J. Granger (1987), “Cointegration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation and Testing,“ Econometrica, 55, 251-76. 21. Engle, R. F. and K. Kroner (1995), “Multivariate Simultaneous Generalized ARCH ” Econometric Theory, .11, .2, 122-150. 22. Engle, R. F. and V. M. Ng (1993), “Measuring and Testing the Impact of News on Volatility,“ Journal of Finance, 48, 1749-1778. 23. Glosten, L., R. Jagannathan, and D. Runkle (1993), “On the Relation Between the Expected Value and the Volatility on the Nominal Excess Returns on Stocks,” Journal of Finance, 19, 3-29. 24. Granger, C. W. J. , Huang, Bwo-Nung and Yang, Chin-Wei (2000), “A Bivariate causality between stock prices and exchange rates: evidence from recent Asian flu”, Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Vol.40(3), 337-354. 25. Granger, C. W. J. and Terasvirta, T. (1993), “Modelling Nonlinear Economic Relationships,” Oxford. U.K.: Oxford University Press. 26. Granger, C. and P. Newbold (1974), “Spurious Regression in Econometrics,” Journal of Econometrics, 2, 111-120. 27. Hamao Y., Masulis, R. W. and Ng, V. (1990), “Correlations in price changes and volatility across international stock markets”, Review of Financial Studies, 3, 281-307. 28. Hong, Yongmiao (2001) “A Test for Volatility Spillover with Application to Exchange Rates,” Journal of Econometrics, 103, 2001, 183-224. 29. Hung, B.W.S., and C.S.P. Tong (1994), “Capital Flows and Stock Price Volatility: Evidence from Hong Kong,” Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 11, 225-235. 30. Johansen, S. (1988), “Statistical Analysis of Cointegration Vectors,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12, 231-254. 31. Johansen, S. (1991), “Estimation and Hypotheses in Testing of Cointegration Vector in Gaussian Vector Autoregressive Model,” Econometrica, 59, 1551-1580. 32. Johansen, S. and K. Juselius (1990), “Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference on Cointegration-with Application to the Demand for Money,” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and statistics, 52, 169-210. 33. Kanas, A. (1998), “Volatility Spillovers Across Equity Market: European Evidence,“ Applied Financial Economics, 8, 245-256. 34. Kanas, A. (2000), ”Volatility Spillovers Between Stock Returns and Exchange Rate Changes: International Evidence,” Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 27, 447-467. 35. Kanas, A. (2002), “Is Exchange Rate Volatility Influence by Stock Return Volatility? Evidence from the US, the UK and Japan,” Applied Economics Letters, 1-3, preview article. 36. Kapetanios, G., Shin Yongcheol., and Snell, A. (2003), “Testing for a unit root in the nonlinear STAR framework,” Journal of Econometrics, 112, 359-379. 37. Karolyi, G. A., 1995, “A Multivariate GARCH Model of International Transmissions of Stock Returns and Volatility: The Case of the United States and Canada,” Journal of Business and Economics Statistics, Vol. 13, No. 1, 11-25. 38. Koutmos, G. (1998), “Asymmetries in the Conditional Mean and the Conditional Variance: Evidence from Nine Stock Markets,” Journal of Economics and Business, 50, 277–290. 39. Koutmos, G. and G. Booth, “Asymmetric volatility transmission in international stock markets” Journal of International Money and Finance, 14, 1995, 747-762. 40. Kroner, F., and V. Ng, (1998), “Modelling asymmetric comovements of asset returns,” The Review of Financial Studies, 11,817-844. 41. Kwiatkowski, D., P. C. B. Phillips, P. Schmidt and Y. Shin (1992), “Testing the Null Hypothesis of Stationary Against the Alternative of a Unit Root,” Journal of Econometrics, 54, 159-178. 42. Kwon, Chung S., Tai S. Shin, and Frank W. Bacon (1997), “The Effect of Macroeconomic Variables on Stock Market Returns in Developing Markets,” Multinational Business Review, 2, 63-70. 43. Li, W. K. and K. Lam (1995), “Modelling Asymmetry in Stock Returns by a Threshold Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedastic Model,” The Statistician, 44, 333–341. 44. Liu, Y. Angela and Pan, Ming Shiun (1997), “Mean and Volatility Spillovers Effects in the U.S. and Pacific-Basin Stock Markets,” Multinational Finance Journal, Vol.1, 47-62. 45. Ljung, G. M. and G. E. P. Box (1978), “On a Measure of Lack of Fit in Time Models,” Biometrika, 65, 297-303. 46. Luukkonen, R., Saikkonen, P., Terasvirta, T. (1988), “Testing Linearity against smooth transition autoregressive models,” Biometrika, 75, 491-499. 47. Michael, Panos, A. R. Nobay, and David Peel (1997), “Transaction costs and non-linear adjustments in real exchange rates: An empirical investigation,” Journal of Political Economy, 105, 862-879. 48. Mok, H. M.K. (1993), “Causality of Interest Rate, Exchange Rate and Stock Prices at Stock Market Open and Close in Hong Kong,” Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21, 603-612. 49. Nelson, C. R. and C. I. Plosser (1982), “Trends and Random Walks in Macroeconomic Time Series: Some Evidence and Implications,” Journal of Monetary Economics, 10, 139-162. 50. Nelson, D. B. (1990), “ARCH Models as Diffusion Approximations,” Journal of Econometrics, 45, 7-38. 51. Nelson, D. B. (1991), “Conditional Heteroskedasticity in Asset Returns : a New Approach,” Econometrica, 59, 347-370. 52. Newey, W. and K. West (1987), “A simple positive semi-definite, heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix,” Econometrica, 55, 703-708. 53. Nieh, C. C., and C. F. Lee (2001), “Dynamic Relationship between Stock Prices and Exchange Rate for G-7 Countries,” Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 41(4), 477-491. 54. Ng, Serena and P. Perron (2001), “Lag Length Selection and the Construction of Unit Root Tests with Good Size and Power,” Econometrica, 69, 1519-1554. 55. Osterwald-Lenum, M. (1992), “A Note with Quantiles of the Asymptotic Distribution of the Maximum Likelihood Cointegration Rank Test Statistics,” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 54, 461-472. 56. Phillips, P. C. B. and P. Perron (1988), “Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series Regression,” Biometrika, 75, 335-346. 57. Pippenger, M. K. and Goering, G. E. (1993), “A note on the empirical power of unit root tests under threshold processes,” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 55, 473-481. 58. Said, S. E. and D. A. Dickey (1984), “Testing for Unit Roots in Autoregressive-Moving Average Models of Unknown Order,” Economics Letters, 60, 131-137. 59. Schwert, G. W. (1990), “Stock Volatility and the Crash of 87,” Review of Financial Studies, 3, 461-464. 60. Su, Yong-Chern and Tsai, J. S.(1996), “Volatility and Return Spillovers among Asia Emerging Market”, Review of Securities and Futures Markets, Vol. 8, No. 1, 67-87. 61. Theodossiou, P. and U. Lee (1993),“Mean and Volatility Spillovers across Major National Stock Markets:Future Empirical Evidence” Journal of Financial Research, Vol.16, No.4, 337-350. 62. Theodossiou, P. and Lee, U. (1995), “Relationship between volatility and expected returns across international stock markets,” Journal of Bussiness Finance & Accounting, Vol.22, pp.289-300. 63. Tse, Y.K. amd L.K. Ng (1997), ”The cointegration of Asian currencies revisited,” Japan and the World Economy, 9: 109-114 64. Wang, P. and P. Wang (2001), “Equilibrium Adjustment, Basis Risk and Risk Transmission in Spot and Forward Foreign Exchange Markets,” Applied Financial Economics, 11, 127-136. 65. Yang, S. R. and B. W. Brorsen (1993), “Nonlinear dynamics of daily futures prices: Conditonal heteroskedasticity or chaos,” Journal of Futures Markets, 13, 2, 175-191. 66. Zapatero, F. (1995), “Equilibrium Asset Prices and Exchange Rates,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and control, 19, 787. |
論文全文使用權限 |
如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信