淡江大學覺生紀念圖書館 (TKU Library)
進階搜尋


下載電子全文限經由淡江IP使用) 
系統識別號 U0002-1501201914061800
中文論文名稱 探討團隊的框架理論:團隊績效
英文論文名稱 A Theoretical Framework About Team: Team Performance
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中) 國際企業學系碩士班
系所名稱(英) Master's Program, Department Of International Business
學年度 107
學期 1
出版年 108
研究生中文姓名 陳姵君
研究生英文姓名 Pei-Chun Chen
學號 606550035
學位類別 碩士
語文別 英文
口試日期 2019-01-10
論文頁數 17頁
口試委員 指導教授-劉菊梅
指導教授-林介鵬
委員-簡玉惠
委員-何怡芳
委員-劉菊梅
中文關鍵字 團隊績效  集體效能  功能失調的行為  團隊政治  團隊情緒調節  團隊認同 
英文關鍵字 Team Performance  Collective Efficacy  Dysfunctional Behaviour  Team Politics  Team Emotional Regulation  Team Identification 
學科別分類
中文摘要 儘管多年來「團隊」在過去得到了廣泛的研究,惟其實務原理和操作面的探討卻相對較少。 為了補充研究,本研究基於團隊理論建立了團隊績效的理論框架,目的是理解哪些因素可能會影響團隊績效。 具體而言,在提議的框架中,團隊績效受到集體效能,功能失調行為,團隊政治,團隊情緒調節和團隊認同的間接影響。 最後,此研究亦提供了基於框架和結論之相關命題。
英文摘要 Although “Team” has been widely studied in previous research for years, how its performance works is relatively understudied. To complement the research, this study develops a theoretical framework of team performance based on team theory for the purpose of understanding through what elements are likely to influence team performance. Specifically, in the proposed framework, team performance is indirectly influenced by collective efficacy, dysfunctional behaviour, team politics, team emotional regulation, and team identification. Finally, the relevant propositions based on the framework and research conclusions are provided.
論文目次 Table of Contents

Acknowledgements ⅰ
Abstract (In Chinese) ⅱ
Abstract (In English) ⅲ
Table of Contents ⅳ
List of Figures ⅴ
1 Introduction 1
1.1 Background and Context 1
1.2 Scope and Objectives 1
1.3 Overview of Thesis 1
2 Research Concepts and Investigation 2
2.1 Team Performance 2
2.2 Collective Efficacy 2
2.3 Team Identification 3
2.4 Dysfunctional Behavior 3
2.5 Team Politics 4
2.6 Team Emotinal Regulation 5
3 Theory and Proposition About Team 6
3.1 Team Performance and Collective Efficacy 6
3.2 Team Performance and Team Identification 6
3.3 Team Performance and Dysfunctional Behavior 7
3.4 Team Performance and Team Politics 9
3.5 Team Performance and Team Emotinal Regulation 9
4 Conclusion 11
4.1 Theoratical Implications 11
4.2 Managerial Implications 11
4.3 Practical Implications 11
4.4 Research Limitations 11
4.5 Reseaarch Discussion 11
References 13

List of Figures

Figure 1. Five Components in Team Performance 10
參考文獻 References

[1] A Cross-sectional Study in Iranian Population, n.d.
[2] Ancona, D. G. and Caldwell, D. F., 1992a. Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams, Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(4), 634-665.
[3] Ancona, D. G. and Caldwell, D. F., 1992b. Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance, Organization Science, 3(3), 321-341.
[4] Ashforth, B. E. and Male, F., 1989. Social identity theory and the organization, Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20-39.
[5] Bandura, A., 2000. Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(3), 75-78.
[6] Bloomfire, 2013. CrunchBase.
[7] Bolander, J., 2011. How to Deal with Organizational Politics, The Daily MBA.
[8] Browning, C. R., 2002. The Span of Collective Efficacy: Extending Social Disorganiza-tion Theory to Partner Violence, Journal of Marriage and Family, 64(4), 833-850.
[9] Bukowitz, W. R. and Williams, R. L., 1999. The Knowledge Management Fieldbook, FT Press.
[10] Butcher, J., Mineka, S. and Hooley, J., 2007. Abnormal Psychology and Modern Life (13th Ed), Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
[11] Cabrera, A. and Cabrera, E. F., 2002. Knowledge-sharing Dilemmas, Organization Stud-ies, 23 (5), 687-710.
[12] Cheney, G. and Tompkins, P., 1987. Coming to Terms with Organizational Identification and Commitment, Central States Speech Journal, 38(1), 1-15.
[13] Ciborra, C.U. and Patriota, G., 1998. Groupware and teamwork in R&D: limits to learn-ing and innovation, R&D Management, 28 (1), 1-10.
[14] Classification and Assessment of Abnormal Behavior, 2014. csun.edu.
[15] Cole, E., 2008. How Does Dysfunctional Behavior Influence Team Performance – and What Can You Do about It? Neeley School of Business at TCU.
[16] Cole, M. S., Walter, F. and Bruch, H., 2008. Affective mechanisms linking dysfunctional behavior to performance in work teams: A moderated mediation study, Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(5), 945-958.
[17] Delia, E. B. and James, J. D., 2010. The meaning of team in team identification, Sport Management Review, 21(4), 416-429.
[18] Eisenberg, N. and Fabes, R. A., 1992. Emotion regulation and the development of social competence.
[19] Emotion Regulation Therapy, n.d. Retrieved from https://www.emotionregulationtherapy.com/
[20] Gibson, B. C., 1999. Do they do what they believe they can? Group efficacy and group effectiveness across tasks and cultures. Academy of Management Journal, 42(2), 138-152.
[21] Gully, S. M., Incalcaterra, K. A., Joshi, A. and Beaubien, J.M., 2002. A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as mod-erators of observed relationships, Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(5), 819-832.
[22] Hasmath, R. and Hsu, J. Y. J., 2016. Communities of Practice and the NGO Sector in China, International Society for Third Sector Research Conference (Stockholm, Sweden), 6/28-7/1(1), SSRN: 2612686.
[23] Hodge, L. and Carron, A. L., 1992. Collective-efficacy and group performance, Interna-tional Journal of Sport Psychology, 23(1), 48-59.
[24] James, O., 2013. Office Politics: How to Thrive in a World of Lying, Backstabbing and Dirty Tricks.
[25] Jex, S. M. and Gudanowski, D. M., 1992. Efficacy beliefs and work stress: An explora-tory study, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(5), 509-517.
[26] Larsen, J., 2012. Business Psychology - Latest Findings, Supervision Findings.
[27] Lebarre, P., 1999. The New Face of Office Politics, Fast Company.com, Mansueto Ven-tures, LLC.
[28] Lembke, S. and Wilson, M. G., 1998. Putting the ‘team’ into teamwork: Alternative theoretical contributions for contemporary management practice, Human Relations, 51(7), 927-944.
[29] Ludwig, J., Duncan, G. J. and Hirschfield, P., 2001. Urban Poverty and Juvenile Crime: Evidence from a Randomized Housing-Mobility Experiment, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(2), 655-679.
[30] Marilyn H., n.d. Office Politics, BigBadBoss.com
[31] Marty, M. A. and Segal, D. L., n.d. The Encyclopedia of Clinical Psychology, American Cancer Society, 1-6.
[32] McLeod, S., 2014. The Medical Model, Simply Psychology.
[33] Miller, D. and Shamsie, J., 1996. The resource-based view of the firm in two environ-ments: The Hollywood film studios from 1936 to 1965, Academy of Management Journal, 39 (5), 519-543.
[34] Morenoff, J. D., Robert, J. S., and Stephen W. R., 2001. Neighborhood Inequality, Collective Efficacy, and the Spatial Dynamics of Urban Violence, Criminology, 39(3), 517-558.
[35] Morgeson, F. P., DeRue, D. S. and Karam, E. P., 2010. Leadership in teams: A functional approach to understanding leadership structures and processes. Journal of Management, 36(1), 5-39.
[36] Musa, D. S, 2016. Tip Sheet for Leaders on Politics.
[37] Organizational Politics, 2012. WebFinance, Inc.
[38] Parker, L. E., 1994. Working together: Perceived self and collective efficacy at the workplace, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24(1), 43-59.
[39] Poole, P. P., Gray, B. and Gioia, D. A., 1990. Organizational script development through interactive accommodation, Group and Organization Studies, 15(2), 212-232.
[40] Pratt, M. G., 1998. To be or not to be, Central questions in organizational identification, in Whetten, D. and Godfrey, P. (eds.), Identity in Organizations, Developing Theory through Conversations, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA: 171-207.
[41] Psychology: Core Concepts, n.d.
[42] Rennison, D. J., Owens, G. L., Heckman, N., Schluter, D. and Veen, T., 2016. Rapid evo-lution of colour vision in the threespine stickleback adaptive radiation, Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 283:20160242.
[43] Rousseau, D. M., 1998. Why workers still identify with organizations, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19(3), 217-233.
[44] Sampson, R. J., Jeffrey D. M. and Thomas, G. R., 2002. Assessing Neighborhood Effects: Social Processes and New Directions in Research, Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 443-478.
[45] Sampson, R. J., Stephen, W. R. and Felton, E., 1997. Neighborhoods and Violent Crime: A Multilevel Study of Collective Efficacy, Science, 277(5328), 918-924.
[46] Sampson, R. J., Stephen, W. R., 1999. Systematic Social Observation of Public Spaces: A New Look at Disorder in Urban Neighborhoods, American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 603.
[47] Seijts, G. H., Latham, G. P. and Whyte, G., 2000. Effects of self- and group efficacy on group performance in a mixed-motive situation, Human Performance, 13(3), 279-298.
[48] Serban, A. M. and Luan, J., 2002. An Overview of Knowledge Management, University of Kentucky, New Directions for Institutional Research, 113(Spring), 5-16.
[49] Simon, H. A., 1947. Administrative Behavior, The Macmillan Co.: New York.
[50] Spink, K. S., 1990. Collective efficacy in the sport setting, International Journal of Sport Psychology, 21(4), 380-395.
[51] Stephanie, T. S., 2011. Team identification: a determining factor of performance, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 26(3), 247-258.
[52] Thorsten S., Norbert S. and Hendrik W., 2017. Team political skill and team performance, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 32(3), 239-253.
[53] Tompkins, P., 2005. Apollo, Challenger, Columbia: The Decline of the Space Program, A Study in Organizational Communication, Roxbury Publishing Company: Los Angeles, California.
[54] Tyler, T. R. and Blader, S., 2000. Cooperation in Groups: Procedural Justice, Social Identity, and Behavioral Engagement, Psychology Press, Philadelphia, PA.
[55] Van Dick, R. and Wagner, U., 2002. Social identification among schoolteachers: Dimen-sions, foci, and correlates. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 11, 129-49.
[56] Whitney, K., 1994. Improving group task performance: The role of group goals and group efficacy, Human Performance, 7(1), 55-78.
[57] Zaccaro, S. J., Blair, V., Peterson, C. and Zazanis, M., 1992. Collective efficacy, In J. E. Maddux (Ed.), Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment: Theory, research, and applica-tions, 305-328, NY: Plenum series in social/clinical psychology.
論文使用權限
  • 同意紙本無償授權給館內讀者為學術之目的重製使用,於2019-01-24公開。
  • 同意授權瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2019-01-24起公開。


  • 若您有任何疑問,請與我們聯絡!
    圖書館: 請來電 (02)2621-5656 轉 2281 或 來信