§ 瀏覽學位論文書目資料
系統識別號 U0002-1407201917342400
DOI 10.6846/TKU.2019.00349
論文名稱(中文) 核心代理問題對薪酬績效敏感性之影響-以薪酬委員會為調節效果
論文名稱(英文) The Impact of Core Agency Problem on Pay-performance Sensitivity :Moderating Effects of Compensation Committee
第三語言論文名稱
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中文) 會計學系碩士班
系所名稱(英文) Department of Accounting
外國學位學校名稱
外國學位學院名稱
外國學位研究所名稱
學年度 107
學期 2
出版年 108
研究生(中文) 柯文鎧
研究生(英文) Wen-Kai Ko
學號 606600483
學位類別 碩士
語言別 繁體中文
第二語言別
口試日期 2019-06-18
論文頁數 51頁
口試委員 指導教授 - 張雅淇
委員 - 徐志順
委員 - 林芳綺
關鍵字(中) 核心代理問題
薪酬績效敏感性
薪酬委員會
關鍵字(英) Core Agency Problem
Pay-performance Sensitivity
Compensation Committee
第三語言關鍵字
學科別分類
中文摘要
本研究之目的係探討核心代理問題對薪酬績效敏感性之影響,並進一步檢測兩者間的關係是否會受到薪酬委員會的調節。本研究以2012年至2016年為研究期間,研究對象為我國上市電子業公司。實證結果指出核心代理問題(股份控制權與盈餘分配權的偏離)愈高會使薪酬績效敏感性下降。另外,本研究五項薪酬委員會品質特性(薪酬委員會委員之董事年資、薪酬委員會規模、每年開會次數、委員出席率與獨立董事比例)愈高,無法使薪酬績效敏感性增強。最後,本研究亦發現,當薪酬委員會品質愈高,有助於降低核心代理問題對薪酬績效敏感性之影響。
英文摘要
The objective of this study is to discuss relationship between core agency problem and pay-performance sensitivities, and further examine whether the relationship is mediated by compensation committee. In this study we used public listed electronics industry in Taiwan as our study sample and our sample period is from 2012 to 2016. The results found that core agency problem more higher (the controlling shareholder with excess control rights) will reduce pay-performance sensitivities. In addition, The study of the five quality of compensation committee characteristics (directors’ seniority, size of compensation committee, frequency of meetings, members attendance rate and proportion of independent directors) with a high quality will not be stronger to pay-performance sensitivities. At last, the higher the quality of the compensation committee will reduce the impact of core agency problem on pay-performance sensitivities.
第三語言摘要
論文目次
目錄
第壹章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 5
第三節 研究流程 6
第四節 研究架構 7
第貳章 文獻探討與假說發展 8
第一節 核心代理問題 8
第二節 薪酬績效敏感性 11
第三節 薪酬委員會 14
第四節 假說發展 17
第參章 研究方法 21
第一節 觀念性架構 21
第二節 研究期間、樣本選取與資料收集 22
第三節 變數定義與衡量 24
第四節 實證模型 30
第肆章 實證結果與分析 32
第一節 敘述性統計 32
第二節 皮爾森相關分析 35
第三節 迴歸分析 37
第伍章 研究結論與建議 41
第一節 研究結論 41
第二節 研究建議與限制 42
第三節 研究貢獻 43
參考文獻 44

圖目錄
圖1-1研究流程圖 6
圖3-1觀念性架構 21

表目錄
表3-1樣本篩選過程 22
表3-2樣本分布 23
表3-3變數定義與衡量彙總表 29
表4-1薪酬委員會品質主成分分析結果 32
表4-2薪酬委員會品質五項變數(N=1,805) 33
表4-3各變數之敘述性統計(N=1,805) 34
表4-4Pearson相關係數表 36
表4-5公司績效分析結果 37
表4-6核心代理問題對薪酬績效敏感性之分析結果 38
表4-7薪酬委員會對薪酬績效敏感性之分析結果 39
表4-8薪酬委員會調節核心代理問題對薪酬績效敏感性之分析結果 40
參考文獻
中文文獻
王元章與張椿柏,2011,從核心代理問題的角度探討股權結構,董事會特性對公司價值之影響,證券市場發展季刊,第23卷第2期:131-174。
李怡瑩,2010,高階經理人薪酬與公司績效關係-薪酬委員會及專門委員會之調節效果,國立高雄應用科技大學商務經營研究所未出版碩士論文。
李春安、吳欽杉、葉麗玉,2003,盈餘分配權結構與公司非法行為關係之研究-以台灣股票上市公司為例,證券市場發展季刊,第14卷第4期:75-138。
李馨蘋與鄭誌偉,2008,從管理者薪酬與機構法人持股之觀點看企業創新投資之影響因素,東吳經濟商學學報,第62期:47-68。
林淑惠與胡星陽,2003,上市公司高階經理人之酬勞結構,經濟論文,第31卷第2期:171-206。
林嬋娟與張哲嘉,2009,董監事異常變動、家族企業與企業舞弊之關聯性,會計評論,第48期:1-33。
陳如慧,2005,淺論新修訂員工分紅配股規範,證券暨期貨月刊,第23卷第3期:4-9。
陳明園與石雅慧,2004,高階經理人薪酬-代理理論與競賽理論之實證研究,台大管理論叢,第15卷第1期:131-166。
陳金華,2011,薪酬委員會制度實施對我國公司治理之研究-以台灣被動元件產業“P”公司為例,國立交通大學高階主管管理碩士學程未出版碩士論文。
曾玉潔,2000,我國高階主管薪酬決定因素之實證研究,國立中正大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
辜秋屏,1997,高階主管酬勞與公司績效之實證研究,國立台灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
黃源福,2012,我國上市、上櫃公司設置薪酬委員會對對企業績效與董事酬勞之影響,政治大學經營管理研究所碩士論文。
葉銀華,1999,家族控股集團、核心企業與報酬互動之研究-台灣與香港證券市場之比較,管理評論,第18卷第2期:59-86。
劉韻僖與林玟廷,2010,CEO權力與薪酬關係之實證研究-代理和資源依賴觀點,中原企管評論,第8卷第1期:35-60。
潘虹華、廖懿屏與鍾旻純,2019,薪酬委員會之專業性與高階經理人薪酬相對績效評估,會計評論,第68期:119-159。
蔡柳卿,2006,相對績效評估與高階主管薪酬:論產業競爭程度之影響,管理評論,第25卷第1期:69-94。
蔡柳卿與楊朝旭,2004,會計盈餘之監督與評價角色關聯性之研究:台灣實證結果,風險管理學報,第8卷第2期:119-154。
戴怡蕙,2017,股份控制權和盈餘分配權的偏離程度會影響以績效為基準的考核制度誘因效果嗎,會計評論,第65期:1-43。
饒雲韶,2012,薪酬委員會特性與企業價值-中國之實證研究,中國文化大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。
英文文獻
Adams, R., and H. Mehran. 2003. Is corporate governance different for bank holding companies? Economic Policy Review 9 (1): 123-142.
Anderson, R. C., and J. M. Bizjak. 2003. An empirical examination of the role of the CEO and the compensation committee in structuring executive pay. Journal of Banking & Finance 27 (7): 1323-1348.
Antle, R., and A. Smith. 1986. An empirical investigation of the relative performance evaluation of corporate executives. Journal of Accounting Research 24(1): 1-39.
Baek, J., J. Kang, and S. P. Kyung. 2004. Corporate Governance and Firm value:Evidence from Korean Financial Crisis. Journal of Financial Economics 71(2): 265-313.
Banker, R. D., S. Y Lee, and G. Potter. 1996. A field ftudy of the impact of a performance-based incentive plan. Journal of Accounting and Economics 21 (2): 195-226.
Becker, B. 2006. Wealth and executive compensation. The Journal of Finance 61 (1): 379-397.
Beasley, M. S. 1996. An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud. The Accounting Review 71 (4): 443-465.
Berle, A. A., and G. C. Means. 1932. The Modern Corporation and Private Property. New York: Macmilian.
Bouwens, J., and L.V. Lent. 2006. Performance measure properties and the effect of incentive contracts. Journal of Management Accounting Research 18 (1): 55-75.
Bruce, A., R. Skovoroda, J. Fattorusso, and T. Buck. 2007. Executive bonus and firm performance in the UK. Long Range Planning 40 (3): 280-294.
Bushman, R., Q. Chen, E. Engel, and A. Smith. 2004. Financial accounting information organizational complexity and corporate governance systems. Journal of Accounting and Economics 37 (2): 167-201.
Byrd, J. W., and K. A. Hickman. 1992. Do outside directors monitor managers? Evidence from tender offer bids. Journal of Financial Economics 32 (2): 195-221.
Cheung, Y. L., A. Stouraitis, and A. W. S. Wong. 2005. Ownership concentration and executive compensation in closely held firms: Evidence from Hong Kong.  Journal of Empirical Finance 12 (4): 511-532.
Chung, K. H., and S. W. Pruitt. 1996. A Simple Approximation of Tobin’s Q. Financial Management 23: 70-74.
Claessens, S., S. Djankov, J. P. H. Fan, and L. H. P. Lang. 2000. The Separation of Ownership and Control in East Asian Corporation. Journal of Financial Economics 58(1-2): 81-112.
Claessens, S., S. Djankov, J. P. H. Fan and L. H. P. Lang. 2002. Disentangling the Incentive and Entrenchment Effects of Large Shareholdings. Journal of Finance 57(6): 2741-2771.
Comprix, J., and K. A. Mueller. 2006. Asymmetric treatment of reported pension expense and income amounts in CEO cash compensation. Journal of Accounting and Economics 42 (3): 385–416.
Coombs, J. E., and K. M. Gilley. 2005. Stakeholder management as a predictor of CEO compensation: Main effects and interactions with financial performance. Strategic Management Journal 26 (9): 827-840.
Core, J. E., R. W. Holthausen, and D. F. Larcker. 1999. Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics 51 (3): 371-406.
Craighead, J. A., M. L. Magnan, and L. Thorne. 2004. The impact of mandated disclosure on performance-based CEO compensation. Contemporary Accounting Research 21 (2): 369-398.
Dechow, P. M., M. R. Huson, and R. G. Sloan. 1994. The effect of restructuring charges on executives’ cash compensation. The Accounting Review 69 (1): 138–156.
Faccio, M., L. Lang, and L. Young. 2001. Dividends and Expropriation. American Economic Review 91: 54-78.
Fama, and M. C. Jensen. 1983. Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics 26 (2): 301-325.
Gaver, J. J., and K. M. Gaver. 1998. The relation between nonrecurring accounting transactions and CEO cash compensation. The Accounting Review 73 (2): 235-253.
Hermalin, B. E., and M. S. Weisbach. 1998. Endogenously chosen boards of directors and their monitoring of the CEO. The American Economic Review 88 (1): 96-118.
Holmstrom, B. 1979. Moral hazard and observability. The Bell Journal of Economics  10 (1): 74-91.
Hartzell, J. C., and L. T. Starks. 2003. Institutional investors and executive compensation. Journal of Finance 58 (6): 2351-2374.
Hausman, J. 1978. Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica 46 (6): 1251-1271.
Iyengar, R. J., and E. M. Zampelli. 2008. Auditor independence, executive pay and firm performance. Accounting and Finance 48 (2): 259-278.
Jensen, M. C. and R. S. Ruback. 1983. The Market for Corporate Control: The Scientific Evidence. Journal of Financial Economics 11: 5-50.
Jensen, M. C. and W. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3: 305-360.
Jensen, M. C., and K. J. Murphy. 1990. Performance pay and top-management incentives. Journal of Political Economy 98 (April): 225-264.
Jiraporn, P., Y. S. Kim, and W. N. Davidson. 2005. CEO compensation, shareholder rights, and corporate governance: An empirical investigation. Journal of Economics and Finance 29 (2): 242-258.
Joh, S. W. 2003. Corporate Governance and Firm Profitability: Evidence form Korea before the Economic Crisis. Journal of Financial Economics 68 (2): 287-322.
La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny. 1998. Law and Finance.  Journal of Political Economy 106: 1113-1155.
La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, and A. Shleifer. 1999. Corporate Ownership Around the World. Journal of Finance 54: 471-517.
La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny. 2000. Investor Protection and Corporate Governance. Journal of Financial Economics 58 (1): 3-27.
Landsberg, R. D. 2007. Understanding the role of a corporate compensation committee. Journal of Financial Service Professionals 61 (4): 22-23.
Lee, S. P., and H. J. Chen. 2011. Corporate governance and firm value as determinants of CEO compensation in Taiwan. Management Research Review 34 (3): 252-265.
Lemmon, M. L., and K. V. Lins. 2003. OwnershipStructure, Corporate Governance, and Firm Value:Evidence form the East Asian Financial Crisis. Journal of Finance 58 (4): 1445-1468.
Leonard, J. S. 1990. Executive pay and firm performance. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 43 (3): 13-29.
Lilling, M. S. 2006. The link between CEO compensation and firm performance: Does simultaneity matter? Atlantic Economic Journal 34 (1): 101-114.
Lipton, M., and J. W. Lorsch. 1992. A modest proposal for improved corporate governance. The Business Lawyer 48 (1): 59-77.
Mallette, P., and K. L. Fowler. 1992. Effects of board composition and stock ownership on the adoption of “poison pills”. Academy of Management Journal 35 (5): 1010-1035.
Matolcsy, Z., and A. Wright. 2011. CEO compensation structure and firm performance. Accounting and Finance 51 (3): 745-763.
McConnell, J., and H. Servaes. 1990. Additional Evidence on Equity Ownership and Corporate Value. Journal of Financial Economics 27: 595-612.
Mehran, H. 1995. Executive compensation structure, ownership, and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics 38 (2): 163-184.
Mishra, C., and J. Nielsen. 2000. Board independence and compensation policies in large bank holding companies. Financial Management 29 (Autumn): 51–69.
Morck, R., A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny. 1988. Management Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Financial Economics 20: 293-315.
Murphy, K. J. 1985. Corporate Performance and Managerial Remuneration: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Accounting and Economics 1 (1): 11-42.
Newman, H. A., and H. A. Mozes. 1999. Does the composition of the compensation committee influence CEO compensation practices? Financial Management 28 (3):  41-53.
Nikos, V. 1999. Board meeting frequency and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics 53 (1): 113-142.
Park, Y. W., T. Nelson, and M. R. Huson. 2001. Executive pay and the disclosure environment: Canadian evidence. The Journal of Financial Research 24 (3): 347-365.
Pozen, R. C. 2010. The case for professional boards. Harvard Business Review 88: 50-58.
Perry, T., and M. Zenner. 2001. Pay for performance? Government regulation and the structure of compensation contracts. Journal of Financial Economics 62 (3): 453-488.
Ryan, H. E. Jr., and R. A. Wiggins. 2002. The Interactions between R&D Investment decisions and compensation policy. Financial Management 31 (1): 5-29.
Salancik, G. R. 1977. Commitment is too easy. Organizational Dynamics 6 (1): 62-80.
Shaw, K. W., and M. H. Zhang. 2010. Is CEO cash compensation punished for poor firm performance? The Accounting Review 85 (3): 1065-1093.
Shleifer, A., and R. Vishny. 1986. Large Shareholders and Corporate Control. Journal of Political Economy 94: 461-488.
Shleifer, A., and R. Vishny. 1997. A Survey of Corporate Governance. Journal of Finance 52: 737-783.
Sloan, R. G. 1993. Accounting earnings and top executive compensation. Journal of Accounting and Economics 16 (1): 55-100.
Sun, J., and S. F. Cahan. 2009. The effect of compensation committee quality on the association between CEO cash compensation and accounting performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review 17 (2): 193-207.
Suwina, C., and F. Michael. 2005. Ownership, corporate governance and top management pay in Hong Kong. Corporate Governance: An International Review 13 (2): 291-302.
Tirole, J. 1986. Hierarchies and bureaucracies: On the role of collusion in organizations. Journal of Law, Economics & Organization 2 (2): 181-214.
Vafeas, N. 2000. Board structure and the informativeness of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 19 (2): 139-160.
Vafeas, N. 2003. Further evidence on compensation committee composition as a determinant of CEO compensation. Financial Management 32 (2): 53-70.
Vafeas, N., and Z. Afxentiou. 1998. The association between the SEC’s 1992 compensation disclosure rule and executive compensation policy changes. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 17 (1): 27-54.
Watts, R. L., and J. L. Zimmerman. 1986. Positive Accounting Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Williamson, O. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. New York: Free Press.
Yatim, P. 2010. Board structures and the establishment of a risk management committee by Malaysian listed firms. Journal of Management & Governance 14 (1): 17-36.
Zhu, Y., G. Tian, and S. Ma. 2009. Executive compensation, board characteristics and firm performance in China: The impact of compensation committee. Conference paper, The 22nd Australasian Finance and Banking Conference.
論文全文使用權限
校內
紙本論文於授權書繳交後5年公開
同意電子論文全文授權校園內公開
校內電子論文於授權書繳交後5年公開
校外
同意授權
校外電子論文於授權書繳交後5年公開

如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信