為因應全球化的挑戰以及資訊產業環境快速變化及激烈競爭，近年來企業逐漸捨棄傳統的組織型態，轉而以專案為導向的工作型態來回應環境變遷與客戶需求，進而達成企業目標。
    專案團隊以專案經理人為中心，扮演領導、溝通、協調、整合的角色，透過與專案團隊成員的互動，進而對專案績效產生影響。因此，面對專案團隊成員的多元性與相互依存關係，專案經理人應透過何種領導模式來影響團隊成員的互動，並藉由團隊互動來提昇專案績效，為本論文主要研究目的。
    本研究從相關的文獻探討開始著手，再根據其理論基礎建立本研究之架構與假設，並選用適當的量表為研究工具，採用便利抽樣法進行抽樣，經抽取國內目前從事伺服器產品研發之本土與外資企業的專案團隊成員300人為對象實施問卷調查。針對回收的有效樣本196份資料，進行信度分析、敘述性統計、因素分析、相關分析及階層迴歸分析。經實證分析和討論後，獲致結論如下：
1.轉換型領導對團隊互動具有較高且顯著的影響效果。
2.團隊互動對專案績效具有顯著影響效果。
3.團隊互動對領導模式與專案績效之關係具有中介作用。
    最後，依據研究結論，對研發伺服器產品之企業及未來研究提出具體建議，以供參考。

To face on the globalize challenge, fast change and keen competition of information technology industry environment, the enterprises give up the traditional organization type gradually in recent years, and turn the work type to be project as direction to responds to the environmental changes and customer's demand, and then reach the enterprise goals.
  The project team regards the project manager as the centre, act the role as leaded, communicated, coordinated, combined, and through the interaction with project team members, and exert an influence on the project performance. 
  Therefore, to against the pluralism and interdependence relation of the project team members, what styles of leadership that project manager should take to influence the interaction of the team members, and through the interaction from the team to raise the project performance? Those issues will be the main study purpose for this research.
  This research adopts convenience sampling to take the samples. After collected questionnaires from 300 subjects who engaged in research and development of products of the server at local and foreign enterprises in Taiwan, there are total 196 valid questionnaires were returned. Aimed at those valid samples to proceed with validity analysis, descriptive statistics, factor analysis, correlation analysis and hierarchical regression analysis, the empirical research findings as below:
1.Comparing to transactional leadership, transformational leadership has more significant influence on team interaction.
2.Team interaction has significant effect on the performance of project.
3.The relationship between transformational leadership and project performance is mediated by team interaction. 
  Finally, the research limit, future research direction, and the meaning of the theoretical and practical of this study were also discussed.

目錄	I
表目錄	III
圖目錄	V
第一章 緒論	1
第一節 研究背景與動機	1
第二節 研究目的	2
第三節 研究範圍與對象	2
第四節 研究流程與論文架構	2
第二章 文獻探討	5
第一節 國內伺服器產業概況	5
第二節 領導模式	11
第三節 團隊互動	18
第四節 專案管理	23
第五節 領導模式、團隊互動、專案績效的關聯	26
第三章 研究方法	28
第一節 研究架構	28
第二節 變數操作性定義與衡量	28
第三節 研究假說	30
第四節 研究範圍及對象	30
第五節 抽樣設計	31
第六節 資料分析方法	31
第四章 資料分析	33
第一節 基本資料分析	33
第二節 因素分析及問卷信度與效度	39
第三節 研究變數之間的相關性	46
第四節 專案經理領導模式對中介變數（團隊互動）之影響	47
第五節 團隊互動對專案績效之影響	50
第六節 團隊溝通、團隊合作中介效果之探討	51
第五章 結論與建議	56
第一節 研究結論	56
第二節 研究建議	58
參考文獻	61
一、中文部分	61
二、英文部分	62
三、網站部份	67
 
表目錄
表2-1 伺服器的分類	6
表2-2 國內伺服器廠商2005年至2006年第三季出貨量排名順序  8
表4-1 研究樣本性別分佈	34
表4-2 研究樣本婚姻狀況統計	34
表4-3 研究樣本年齡統計	35
表4-4 研究樣本的教育程度統計	35
表4-5 研究樣本的角色功能統計	36
表4-6 研究樣本的職稱統計	37
表4-7 研究樣本的服務年資統計	37
表4-8 研究樣本的公司資本額統計	38
表4-9 研究樣本的團隊人數分佈	39
表4-10 研究樣本的專案完成時間統計	39
表4-11 研究變數之Barlett及KMO表	41
表4-12 專案經理領導模式構面之因素分析	42
表4-13 團隊互動構面之因素分析	43
表4-14 專案績效構面之因素分析	43
表4-15 信度分析	44
表4-16 專案經理領導模式與中介變數、依變數相關係數表	47
表4-17 團隊互動與專案經理領導模式及專案績效之相關性	47
表4-18 專案經理領導模式對團隊互動之迴歸分析彙整表	48
表4-19 專案經理領導模式之構面對團隊溝通之複迴歸分析彙整表49
表4-20 專案經理領導模式之構面對團隊合作之複迴歸分析彙整表49
表4-21 團隊互動對專案績效之迴歸分析彙整表	50
表4-22 團隊互動之構面對專案績效之複迴歸分析彙整表	51
表4-23 團隊溝通與專案經理領導模式構面對專案績效之層級迴歸分彙整表	53
表4-24 團隊合作與專案經理領導模式構面對專案績效之層級迴歸分析彙整表	54
表4-25 假設驗證結果一覽表	55
 
圖目錄
圖1-1 研究流程	3
圖2-1 2000年-2007年台灣伺服器產業產量	9
圖2-2 2000年-2007年全球伺服器產業產量	9
圖2-3 2000年-2007年台灣伺服器產業產值	10
圖2-4 2004年-2006年第三季台灣伺服器出貨可支援之CPU數量  11
圖3-1 研究架構圖	28
圖3-2 中介模式示意圖	32
圖4-1 因素分析後之研究架構圖	45
圖5-1 轉換型領導─團隊互動─專案績效中介模式圖	58

參考文獻
一、	中文部份
1.	王建忠（2001）。團隊領導與團隊效能：團隊內互動的中介效果。國立臺灣大學心理學研究所碩士論文。
2.	王美玲（2002）。醫療產業團隊管理之實證研究。靜宜大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
3.	王溥（2002）。影響專案工程團隊績效之團隊管理研究。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
4.	王慶富（1996）。專案管理。台北: 聯經出版社。
5.	宋鎮照（2000）。團體動力學。台北: 五南圖書。
6.	李青芬、李雅婷、趙慕芬（譯） （2001）。組織行為學。台北: 華泰書局。(Robbins, S. P., 2001)
7.	周庭銳、陳淑青譯（2001）。專案管理。台北: 華泰書局。(Lock, D., 2000)
8.	俞文釗、王居卿（1986）。管理心理學。台北: 五南圖書。
9.	孫本初、呂育誠（1996）。從分析單元論團隊的意義及其對公共管理之影響。國立政治大學學報，73，145-177。
10.	張書文、戴華亭譯（2002）。產品設計與開發。台北: 麥格羅希爾。(Ulrich, K. T., & Eppinger, S. D., 2000)
11.	許光華、何文榮（1998）。專案管理-理論與實務。台北: 華泰書局。
12.	郭建中譯（2000）。管理學。台北:揚智。(Lussier, R. N., 2000)
13.	陳書瑜 （2002）。影響專案團隊運作績效因素之探討。實踐大學企管所碩士論文。
14.	陳海鳴（1998）。管理概論－理論與台灣實證。台北: 華泰書局。
15.	黃美玉（2004）。組織政治知覺對工作績效之影響－以工作滿足、工作壓力、組織承諾為中介變項。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士在職專班碩士論文。
16.	楊蓉昌（1984）。企業組織與管理。台北: 五南圖書。
17.	葛中俊譯（1996） 。團隊工作的原理 。台北:業強出版社。(Spiegel, J., & Torres, C., 1994)
18.	鄭伯壎（1988）。賞罰行為與部屬性能：操作性條件化學習論的驗證。中華心理學刊，30(2)，95-103。 
19.	鄭毅萍（1998）。以資訊處理觀點探討研究發展專案的協調活動對績效之影響。國立交通大學經營管理研究所博士論文。
20.	羅玉惠（1996）。領導型態與情境因素對專案績效之影響。國立交通大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。

二、	英文部份
1.	Baron, R. M. and Kenny, D. A. (1986). The Moderator-Mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategy, and statistical considerations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
2.	Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., Neubert, M. J., & Mount, M. K. (1998). Relating 
member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(3), 377-391.
3.	Bass, B. M. (1990). Bass & Stogdill's Handbook of Leadership: Theory, Research and Managerial Applications. New York: Free Press.
4.	Bennis, W. (1984). The 4 competencies of leadership. Training and Development Journal, 38(8), 14-19.
5.	Blake, R. R., & Mouton, J. S. (1964). The Managerial Grid: Key Orientations for Achieving Production Through People. Houston: Gulf Publishing.
6.	Campion, M. A., Medsker, G. J., & Higgs, A.C. (1993). Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personal Psychology, 46, 823-825.
7.	Choi, T.Y., & Hartley, J.L. (1996). An exploration of supplier selection practices across the supply chain. Journal of Operation Management, 14, 333-343.
8.	Cleland, D. I., & King. W. R. (1983). Systems Analysis and Project Management (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
9.	Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23, 239-290.
10.	Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1998). Charismatic Leadership in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA：Sage.
11.	Cooper, R. G. (1984). The strategy-performance link in product innovation. R&D Management, 14(4), 247-259.
12.	Dougherty, D. J. (1992). Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organization Science, 3(2), 179-202.
13.	Fiedler F. E., Chemers, M. M., & Mahar, L. (1977). Improving Leadership Effectiveness: The leader Match Concept. New York: John.
14.	Fried, B. J., & Rundall, T. G. (2000). Healthcare Management: Design and Behavior. NY: Delmar Publishers.
15.	Gardiner, P. D., & Stewart, K. (2000). Revisiting the golden triangle of cost, time and quality: the role of NPV in project control, success and failure. International Journal of Project Management, 18(4), 251-256.
16.	Gladstein, D. L. (1984). Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness.   Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 499-517.
17.	Hackman, J. R. (1987). The design of work teams. In J. W. Lorsh (Ed.) Handbook of Organizational Behavior, pp.315-342. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
18.	Hater, J. J., & Bass, B. M. (1988). Supervisors' evaluations and subordinates’ perceptions of transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 695-702.
19.	Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. H.（1984）. The Management of Organizational Behavior (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
20.	House, R. J. (1971). A path-goal theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16, 321-339.
21.	Hyva¨ri, I. (2006). Project management effectiveness in project-oriented business organizations. International Journal of Project Management, 24, 216-225.
22.	Jassawalla, A. R., & Sashittal, H. C. (1999). Building collaborative cross-functional new product teams. Academy of Management Executive, 13(3), 50-61.
23.	Jessup, H. R. (1990). New roles in team leadership. Training and Development Journal, 44(11), 79-83.
24.	Kahai, S. S., Sosik, J. J., & Avolio, B. J. (1997). Effects of leadership style and problem structure on work group process and outcomes in an electronic meeting system environment. Personnel Psychology, 50(1), 121-146.
25.	Kahn, K. B., & McDonough, E. F., III (1997). An empirical study of the relationships among co-location, integration performance, and satisfaction. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 14, 161-178.
26.	Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (1993). The Wisdom of Teams: Creating the High-Performance Organization. New York: Happer Collins.
27.	Kerzner, H. (2001). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling and Controlling (6th ed.). NY: John Wiley & Sons.
28.	Kotlarsky, J., & Oshri, I. (2005). Social ties, knowledge sharing and successful collaboration in globally distributed system development projects. European Journal of Information Systems, 14(1), 37-48.
29.	Lawler, E. E. III, Mohrman, S. A., & Ledfored, G. E. Jr. (1995). Creating High Performance Organizations: Practices and Results of Employee Involvement and Total Quality Management in Fortune 1000 companies. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
30.	Lewis, J. P. (1993). How to Build and Manage a Winning Project Team. NY: American Management Association.
31.	Lock, D. (2000). Project Management (7th ed.). Brookfield. Vt.: Gower.
32.	Lussier, R. N. (2003). Management fundamentals: Concepts, Applications, Skill Development (2nd ed.). Mason: Thomson South-Western.
33.	Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of management Review, 26(3), 356-376.
34.	Martin, G. L., & Dakin, S. R. (1984). Management and magic. California Management Review, 27(1), 125-136.
35.	Mathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., et al (2000). The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 273-283.
36.	McDonough III, E. F. (2000). Investigation of factors contributing to the success of cross-functional teams. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 17, 221-235.
37.	McShane, S. L., & Glinow, M. A. V. (2003). Organizational Behavior: Emerging Realities for the Workplace Revolution (2nd ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill.
38.	Millett, S. M. (1990). The strategic management of technological R&D: An ideal process for the 1990's. International Journal of Technology Management, 5(2), 153-163.
39.	Nelson, K. M., & Cooprider, J. G. (1996). The contribution of shared knowledge to IS group performance. MIS Quarterly, 20(4), 409-432.
40.	Peter, G. D., Richard, R. R., & Jack, W. M. (1997). The effects of peer feedback on team member behavior. Group and Organization Management, 22, 508-520.
41.	Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader satisfactional and organizational citizenship behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, 1(2), 107-142.
42.	Potter R. E., & Balthazard, P. A. (2002). Understanding human interactions and performance in the virtual team. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 4, 1-23.
43.	Quick, T. L. (1992). Successful Team Building. New York: American Management Association.
44.	Reddin, W. J. (1970). Managerial Effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill.
45.	Robbins, S. P. (2001). Organizational Behavior (9th ed.). N.J.: Prentice Hall inc.
46.	Sauer, C. (1993). Why Information Systems Fail: A Case Study Approach. Oxford, UK: Alfred Waller Ltd.
47.	Shonk, J. H. (1982). Working in Teams: A Practical Manual for Improving Work groups. New York: Amacom.
48.	Solomom, C. (2001). Managing virtual teams. Workforce, 80(6), 60-65.
49.	Stevenson, W. J. (2006). Operations Management (9th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
50.	Stewart, G. L., & Barrick, M. R. (2000). Team structure and performance: Assessing the mediating role of intrateam process and the moderating role of task type. Journal of Management, 43, 135-148.
51.	Thanhain, H. J. (2004). Leading technology-based project teams. Engineering Management Journal, 16(2), 35-42.
52.	Turner, J. R., & Müller, R. (2005). The project manager's leadership style as a success factor on projects: A literature review. International Journal of Project Management, 36, 49-61.
53.	Ulrich, K. T., & Eppinger, S. D. (2000). Product Design and Development (2nd ed.). New York: Irwin/McGraw Hill.
54.	Vroom, V. H., & Yetton, P. W. (1973). Leadership and Decision-making. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
55.	Wang, C. H., & Huang, Y. C. (2000). A new approach to calculating project cost variance. International Journal of Project Management, 18, 131-138.
56.	Yukl, G. A. (1998). Leadership in Organizations. NJ: Prentice Hall.

三、	網站部份
1.	中華專案管理學會網站: http://www.npma.org.tw
2.	美國專案管理學會網站: http://www.pmi.org
3.	資策會資訊市場情報中心: http://mic.iii.org.tw