§ 瀏覽學位論文書目資料
  
系統識別號 U0002-1406200523165600
DOI 10.6846/TKU.2005.00261
論文名稱(中文) 不確定環境下台灣半導體產業知識移轉與競爭優勢之研究
論文名稱(英文) A study on the relationships of knowledge transfer and competitive advantage under uncertainty environment on Taiwan semiconductors industry.
第三語言論文名稱
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中文) 管理科學研究所碩士班
系所名稱(英文) Graduate Institute of Management Science
外國學位學校名稱
外國學位學院名稱
外國學位研究所名稱
學年度 93
學期 2
出版年 94
研究生(中文) 胡大謙
研究生(英文) Ta-Chien Hu
學號 692561359
學位類別 碩士
語言別 繁體中文
第二語言別
口試日期 2005-05-13
論文頁數 75頁
口試委員 指導教授 - 廖述賢
委員 - 費吳琛
委員 - 楊維楨
關鍵字(中) 知識移轉
競爭優勢
不確定環境
知識管理
結構方程模式
關鍵字(英) knowledge transfer
competitive advantage
uncertainty environment
knowledge management
SEM
第三語言關鍵字
學科別分類
中文摘要
知識在未來的競爭環境中扮演了一個不可或缺的元素,企業若想獲得持久的競爭優勢,就必須強化本身的智慧資本,提升核心能力。但知識的取得無法完全依靠組織內部發展,必須適時從外在的供應商、合作夥伴、協同廠商移轉到企業內部。因此,知識移轉為企業間分享、傳遞知識的一種過程,若能成功將知識從某一方移轉至另一方且接收者能有效吸收時,方為成功的知識移轉,進而為企業帶來競爭力。

    本研究旨在探討不確定環境、知識移轉與競爭優勢間的關係。我們以台灣半導體產業為調查對象共回收176份有效問卷,並利用結構方程模式來驗證知識移轉、不確定環境對競爭優勢的影響。研究發現,不確定環境、知識移轉與競爭優勢間的關係,在部份中介效果的模型中具有良好的配適,即不確定環境的確會對妨礙知識移轉,而知識移轉對於組織建立持久性的競爭優勢又有正向的效果。另外,知識移轉和競爭優勢具有正向關係;不確定環境和知識移轉具有負向的關係、不確定環境與競爭優勢也具有關聯性。最後,在產業的干擾效果上,知識提供者保護程度對降低依賴,移轉分享組織知識對降低依賴會因為產業的差異性而產生改變。
英文摘要
In the highly competitive business environment, knowledge is recognized as a critical resource. In order to acquire sustain competitive advantage, Organizations must reinforce its intellectual capital and develop core capability. Knowledge are not able to create within their boundaries, they must transfer from suppliers and collaborative partners. Therefore, knowledge transfer is a process of sharing knowledge within organizations. Successful knowledge transfer regarded as the receiver can be absorbed knowledge outside the company effectively, and its will establish competitive advantage.

    This research proposes and tests the relationship between uncertainty environment, knowledge transfer and competitive advantage. Based on a cross-sectional sample of 176 Taiwan semiconductors and a structural equation methodology, this study investigates the effect of knowledge transfer and competitive advantage on uncertainty environment. Our results indicate that in the partial mediated model have a good model fit. It means uncertainty environment hinder knowledge transfer and lead to organizations develop knowledge by themselves to establish competitive advantage. Further, the relationship between uncertainty environment and knowledge transfer is negative. Knowledge transfer and competitive advantage has positive relationship. The more uncertainty environment is related to competitive advantage.
第三語言摘要
論文目次
目錄

第一章 緒論	1
1.1 研究動機	1
1.2 研究問題與目的	2
1.3 研究流程	3
第二章 文獻探討	4
2.1 不確定環境	4
2.2 知識移轉	11
2.3 競爭優勢	19
2.4 不確定環境、知識移轉與競爭優勢	21
第三章 研究方法	24
3.1 概念性架構	24
3.2 研究架構	24
3.3 研究變項操作性定義與測量	25
3.4 研究設計	29
3.5 預試信效度分析	32
3.6 資料分析方法	36
第四章 資料分析與結果	38
4.1 描述性統計分析	38
4.2 測量模型分析	39
4.3 相關分析	47
4.4 結構模型分析	47
4.5 干擾效果檢定	52
第五章 結論與建議	54
5.1 研究結論	54
5.2 研究貢獻	55
5.3 研究限制與後續研究建議	57
參考文獻	60
一、中文部份	60
二、英文部分	60
附錄一:研究問卷	70
附錄二 不確定環境變項調整分析	73

表目錄
表2-1 模糊性前因變項整理	4
表2-2 不確定環境相關研究整理	6
表2-3 知識移轉定義整理	11
表2-4 知識移轉相關研究整理	12
表2-5 知識移轉績效衡量	20
表3-1 研究變項操作性定義及衡量表	26
表3-2 問卷調查對象及回收情形	30
表3-3 預試信度表	33
表3-4 預試收斂效度表	34
表3-5 預試區別效度表	35
表4-1 受測公司基本資料分析表	38
表4-2 正式問卷各構面題項分配與Cronbach α值	40
表4-3 各構面之收斂效度分析結果	40
表4-4 各構面之區別效度分析結果	41
表4-5 各構面驗證性因素分析配適度指標	44
表4-6 測量模型之二階因素模型配適度指標	46
表4-7 相關分析矩陣表	47
表4-8 假設模型與競爭模型支配適度指標比較	48
表4-9 假設路徑驗證結果	48
表4-10產業別干擾效果檢定	52
表5-1 研究假設與驗證結果彙整表	55
 
圖目錄
 
圖1-1研究流程圖	3
圖2-1知識為基礎理論與交易成本關係圖	9
圖3-1概念性架構圖	24
圖3-2研究架構圖	24
圖4-1不確定環境之一階因素模型	42
圖4-2知識移轉之一階因素模型	43
圖4-3競爭優勢之一階因素模型	43
圖4-4不確定環境之二階因素模型	45
圖4-5知識移轉之二階因素模型	45
圖4-6競爭優勢之二階因素模型	46
圖4-7最適化路徑圖	51
參考文獻
一、中文部份
毛倩文(民80)。我國廠商國際技術引進成關鍵因素之研究。國立政治大學國際貿易研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
方世杰(民88)。產研研發聯盟之產商特質、技術移轉特性、互動機制與績效之研究。管理學報,16,633-659。
朱倍瑩(民89)。知識整合機制與創新策略配合類型對知識移轉績效影響之研究-高科技與服務業之比較。中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,桃園縣。
陳定國與徐金水(民67)。中外技術合作之有效途徑(條件與程序)。台北,工業技術研究院金屬研究所。
黃家齊(民79)。技術引進成效影響因素之研究,中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,桃園縣。
楊君琦(民89)。技術移轉互動模式失靈及重塑之研究---以研究機構與中小企業技術合作為例。台灣大學商學研究所博士論文,未出版,台北市。
賴士葆(民81)。如何提高新產品研發績效。中衛簡訊, 10,70-74。
鄭世傑(民92)。知識競爭力之探勘-以台灣IC設計業為例。國防管理學院資源管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北縣。
鄭仁偉、黎世群(民90)。組織公平、信任與人員知識分享行為之關係性研究,人力資源管理學報,2,69-33。
簡俊才(民86)。互動機制、吸收能力與訓練對技術移轉績效之影響—以工研院主導之共同研發聯盟為例。國立暨南大學國際企業學系碩士論文,未出版,南投縣。

二、英文部分
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structure equation model in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.
Arthur, W. B. (1996). Increasing returns and the new world of business. Harvard Business Review, 74(4), 100-110.
Almeida, P., & Kogut, B. (1999). Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Science, 45(7), 905–917.
Argote, L., & Ingram, P. (2000). Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 150–169.
Argote, L., McEvily, B., & Reagans, R. (2003). Managing knowledge in organizations:An integrative framework and review of emerging themes,  Magagement Science, 49(4), 571-582.
Assael, H., & Keon, J. (1982). Nonsampling vs. sampling errors in survey research. Journal of Marketing, 46, 114-123.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Y. Yi. (1998). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Academy of Marketing Science, 27(4), 411-427 
Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage.  Journal of Management. 17, 99-120.
Barney J. B. (1992). Integrating organizational behavior and strategy formulation research: a resource based analysis. In Advances in Strategic Management, Shrivastava P, Huff A, Dutton J (eds.).  8: JAI Press: Greenwich, CT. 
Baughn, C., Denekamp, J., Stevens, J., & Osborn, R. (1997). Protecting intellectual capital in international alliances. Journal of World Business, 2(2), 103-117. 
Baum, J. A. C., & Ingram, P. (1998). Survival-enhancing learning in the Manhattan hotel industry, 1898–1980. Management Science, 44(7), 996–1016.
Bjorkman I., Barner-Rasmussen W., & Li L. (2004). Managing knowledge transfer in MNCs: the impact of headquarters control mechanisms. Journal Of International Business Studies, 35 (5), 443-455.
Boeker, W. (1997). Executive migration and strategic change: The effect of top manager movement on product-market entry.  Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(2), 213–236.
Bresman, H., Birkinshaw, J., & Nobel, R. (1999). Knowledge transfer in international acquisitions. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(3), 439-462.
Cavusgil, S. T, Calantone, R. J., & Zhao, Y. (2003). Tacit knowledge transfer and firm innovation capability. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 18(1),  6-21.
Chamberlin, E. (1939). The theory of monopolistic competition.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 
Chen, C., & Lin, B. (2004). The effects of environment, knowledge attribute, organizational climate, and firm characteristics on knowledge sourcing decisions.  R & D Management , 34 (2), 137-146.
Chen, C. J. (2004). The effects of knowledge attribute, alliance characteristics, and absorptive capacity on knowledge transfer performance. R & D Manegement, 34 (3), 311-321. 
Cohen, W., & Levinthal, D. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128-52.

Crossan, M. M., & A. C. Inkpen. (1994). Commentary promise and reality of learning through alliances. The International Executive, 36(3), 263-273.
Crossan, M. M., & A. C. Inkpen. (1995). The subtle art of learning through alliances. Business Quarterly,  60(2), 69–78. 
Cummings, J. N. (2004). Work groups, structural diversity and knowledge sgaring in a global organization. Management Science, 50(3), 352-364.
Davenport, T. H. & L. Prusak. (1998). Working Knowledge:How Organizations Manage What They Know. Harvard Business School Press.
Day, G. S., & Wensley. R. (1998). Assessing advantage a framework for diagnosing competitive superiority. Journal of Marketing. 52(2), 1-20. 
Day, G. S. (1994). The capability pf market-driven organization. Journal of Marketing. 58, 37-52.
Darr, E., Argote, L., & Epple, D. (1995). The acquisition, transfer and depreciation of knowledge in service organizations: Productivity in franchises. Management Science,  41(11), 1750–1762.
Denrell, J. Arvidsson, N., & Zander, U. (2004). Managing knowledge in the dark: An empirical study of the reliability of capability evaluations. Management Science, 50 (11), 1491-1503.
Dhanaraj, C., Lyles, M. A., Steensma, H. K., & Tihanyi, L. (2004). Managing tacit and explicit knowledge transfer in IJVs: the role of relational embeddedness and the impact on performance. Journal Of International Business Studies, 35 (5),  428-442.
Ding, L. W.,  Velicer, & L. Harlow. (1995). Effects of estimation methods, number of indicators per factor and improper solutions on structural equation modeling fit indices.  Structural Equation Modeling, 2, 119-143.
Doz, Y. L. (1996). The evolution of cooperation in strategic alliances:Initial conditions or learning processes?. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 55-83.
Emory, W. C. (1980). Business Research Methods, Revised Edition, Richard D. Irwin Inc., Illionis.
Epple, D., Argote, L., & Murphy, K. (1996). An empirical investigation of the micro structure of knowledge acquisition and transfer through learning by doing.  Operations Research,  44(1), 77–86.
Foss, N. J., C. Knudsen & C. A. Montgomery. (1995). An exploration of common ground: Integrating evolutionary and strategic theories of the firm. . In C. A. Montgomery (ed.), Resource-Based and Evolutionary Theories of the Firm. Kluwer, London, 1–17. 
Galbraith, C. S. (1990). Transferring core manufacturing technologies in high technology firms. California Management Review, 32(4), 56–70.
Ghoshal, S., & Bartlett, C. (1988). Creation, adoption, and diffusion of innovations by subsidiaries. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3), 365-88.
Gilbert, R. M., & Gordey-Hays, M. (1996). Understanding the process of Knowledge transfer to achieve successful technological innovation, Technovation, 16(6), 301-312
Glazer, R. (1991). Marketing in an information-intensive environment: strategic implications of knowledge as an asset. Journal of Marketing, 55(4), 1-19.
Godfrey P. C, & Hill C. W. L. (1995). The problem of unobservables in strategic management research. Strategic Management Journal, 16(7), 519–533.
Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A., & Segars, A. H. (2001). knowledge management: an organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of management information systems, 18(1), 185-214.
Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal,  17(NSI), 109-122.
Gupta, A., & Govindarajan, V. (2000). Knowledge flows within MNCs. Strategic Management Journal, 21(4), 473-96.
Hamel, G. (1991). Competition for competence and inter-partner learning within international strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 83–103.
Hamel, G. (1998). Strategic Flexibility: Managing in a Turbulent Economy, Wiley, Chichester, UK.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1995). Multivariate Data Analysis, Prentice-Hall: New Jersey.
Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4),  986–1014.
Hedlund. (1994). A model of Knowledge management and the N-form corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 15,  73-90.
Hedlund, G., & U. Zander. (1993). Architectonic and list-like knowledge structuring: A critique of modern concepts of knowledge management, working paper, Stockholm School of Economics.
Heiman, B. A., & Nickerson, J. A. (2004). Empirical evidence regarding the tension between knowledge sharing and knowledge expropriation in collaborations. Managerial and Decision Economics, 25, 401-420.
Hofer, C. W., & Schendel, D. (1978). Strategy formulation:Analytical concepts. St. Paul. MN:West.
Inkpen, A. C., & P. W., Beamish. (1997). Knowledge, bargaining power, and the instability of international joint ventures. Academy of Management Review , 22(1) , 177–202.
Inkpen, A. C., & Dinur A. (1998.). Knowledge management processes and international joint ventures. Organization Science,  9(4),  454–468.
Inkpen, A. C. (2002). learning, knowledge management, and strategic alliances:so many studies, so many unanswered questions, in F.J. Contractor and P. Lorange(eds) Cooperative Strategies and Alliances, Elsevier Science: Amsterdam.
Inkpen, A. C. (2000). Learning through joint ventures: A framework of knowledge acquisition. Journal Of Management Studies,  37 (7),  1019-1043.
Jaccard, J. & Wan C. K. (1996). LISREL Approachs to Interaction Effects in Multiple
Regression. Sage University Papers Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 7-114, Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
 
Jensen, R., & Szulanski, G. (2004). Stickiness and the adaptation of organizational practices in cross-border knowledge transfers. Journal Of International Business Sudies, 35(6), 508-523. 
Kane, A. A., Argote, L. & Levine, J. M. (2005). Knowledge transfer between groups via personnel rotation:Effects of social identity and knowledge quality. Organizational Behavior and Decision Processes, 96, 56-71.
Katz, R., Rebentisch, E. S. & Allen, T. J. (1996). A study of technology transfer in multinational cooperative joint venture. IEEE Transaction on Engineering Management, 43(1), 97-105. 
King, A. W., & Zeithaml. (2001). CPCompetencies and firm performance: Examining the causal ambiguity paradox. Strategic Management Journal, 22(1), 75-99.
Kogut, B., & U. Zander. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science,  3(3), 383–397.
Kogut, B., & U. Zander. (1993). Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation . Journal of International Business Studies ,  24(4), 625–646. 
Kostova, T. (1999). Transnational transfer of strategic organizational practices: A contextual perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24, 308-324.
Lambe, C. J., & Spekman, R. E. (1997). Alliances, external technology acquisition, and discontinuous technological change. Journal of Production Innovation Management, 14, 102-116.
Lane, P. J., Salk J. E., & Lyles, M. A. (2001). Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 22 (12), 1139-1161 .
Leonard-Barton, D., & Sinha, D. K. (1993). Developer-user Interaction And User Satisfaction in Internal Technology Transfer. Academy of Management Journal,  36(5), 1125-1139
Leonard-Barton, D. (1995). Wellsprings of knowledge: building and sustaining the source of innovation. Boston MA. Harvard Business School Press.
Levin, D.Z., & Cross, R. (2004). The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Mamagegent Science, 50 (11), 1477-1490.
Lin, B. W. (2003). Technology transfer as technological learning: a source of competitive advantage for firms with limited R&D resources. R & D Management, 33(3), 327-341.
Lippman, S., & R. Rumelt. (1982). Uncertain imitability: An analysis of interfirm differences in efficiency under competition. Bell Journal of Economics. 13(2),  418–438. 
Lyles, M., & Salk, J. (1996). Knowledge acquisition from foreign parents in international joint ventures: an empirical examination in the Hungarian context. Journal of International Business Studies,  January,  877-903. 
Major, E. & Cordey-Hayes, M. (2000). Knowledge translation: a new perspective on knowledge transfer and foresight. Foresight, 2(4), 411-23.
Mansfield, E. (1982). Technology Transfer, Productivity, and Economic Policy. W.W. Norton and Company, Inc. 
Martin, X., & Salomon, R. (2003). Knowledge transfer capacity and its implications for the theory of the multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies, 34 (4), 356-373. 
Martin, X., & Salomon, R. (2003). Tacitness, learning, and international expansion: A study of foreign direct investment in a knowledge-intensive industry.  Organization Science, 14 (3), 297-311. 
Minbeava, D., Pedersen, T., Bjorkman, I., F. C. F. & Park, H. J. (2003). MNC knowledge transfer, sybsidiary absorptive capacity and HRM. Journal of International Business Studies, 34, 586-599.  
Minbaeva, D. (2005). HRM practices and MNC knowledge transfer. Personnel Review, 34(1), 125-144.
Mosakowski, E. (1997). Strategy making under causal ambiguity: Conceptual issues and empirical evidence. Organization Science,  8(4), 414–442.
Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organization knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14-37. 
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge Creating Company:How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory , 2nd edition .New York: McGraw-Hall
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory, New York, NY:McGraw Hill.
Pak, Y. S., & Park, Y. R. (2004). A framework of knowledge transfer in cross-border joint ventures: An empirical test of the Korean context .Management International Review,  44(4), 417-434. 
Phan, P. H., & Peridis, T. (2000). Knowledge creation in strategic alliances: another look at organizational learning. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 17(2) , 201-222.
Pisano, G. (1988). Innovation through market hierarchies, and joint ventures: Technology, strategy and collaborative arrangements in the biotechnology industry.unpublished PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley. 
Polanyi, M. (1967). The Tacit Dimension. New York:Dubleday
Porter, M. (1994). Toward a dynamic theory of strategy. In R. P. Rumlt, D. E. Schendel and D. J. Teece (eds.), Fundamental Issues in Strategy: A Research Agenda. Harvard Business School Press , Boston, MA, 423–461.
Powell, W. W. (1990). Neither Market nor Hierarchy:Network Forms of  Organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12,  295-336.
Quinn, J. B. (1992). Intelligent Enterprise : a knowledge and service based paradigm for industry. New York:Free
Reed, R., & DeFillippi, R. J. (1990). Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review,  15(1) , 88–102.
Richter, F. J., & K., Vettel. (1995). Successful Joint Venture in Japan: Transfering Knowledge through Organizational Learning. Long Range Planning. 28(3),  37-45.
Riusala, K., & Suutari, V. (2004). International knowledge transfers through expatriates. Thunderbird International Business Review, 46(6), 743-770.
Sakakibara, M. (1997). Heterogeneity of firm capabilities and cooperative research and development: An empirical examination of motives. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 143-64.
Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in administration. New York: Harper & Row. 
Senge, P. (1997). sharing knowledge, Executive Excellence..
Simonin, B. L. (1997). Transfer of Marketing Know-How In International Strategic Alliances: An Empirical Investigation Of The Role And Antecedents Of Knowledge Ambiguity. Journal Of International Business Studies , 30(3) , 463-490. 
Simonin, B. L. (1999). Ambiguity And The Process Of Knowledge Transfer In Strategic Alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 20(7),  595-623. 
Simonin, B. L. (2004). An empirical investigation of the process of knowledge transfer in international strategic alliances. Journal Of International Business Studies,  35(5),  407-427.
Souder, W. E. (1987). Management New Product Innovations. Lexington Books, 217-220.
Stern, P. C. (1979). Evaluating Social Science Research. Oxford University Press,Oxford.
Sveiby, K. E. (1997). The new organizational wealth:managing and knowledge-based assets. San Francisco CA:Berrett-Koehler.
Syed-Lkhsan, S. O. S., & Rowland, F. (2004). Knowledge management in a public organization: a study on the relationship between organizational elements and the performance of knowledge transfer. Journal of management, 8(2),  95-111.
Szulanski, G., Cappetta, R., & Jensen, R. J. (2004). When and how trustworthiness matters: Knowledge transfer and the moderating effect of causal ambiguity. Organization Science,  15 (5),  600-613.
Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring Internal Stickiness: Impediments To The Transfer Of Best Practice Within The Firm. Strategic Management Journal,  17(WIS), 27-43. 
Szulanski G. (2000). The process of knowledge transfer: A diachronic analysis of stickiness. Orgazational Behavior And Human Decision Processes , 82 (1), 9-27.
Tan, R. R. (1996). Success Criteria and Success Factors for External Technology Transfer Projects. Project Management Journal, 45-56.
Teece, J. D. (1976). The Multinational Corporation and Resource Cost of International Technology Transfer. Cambridge, Mass: Ballinger.
Teece, D. J. (1998). Capturing value from knowledge assets: the new economy , markets for know-how , and intangible assets. California Management Review,  40(3) ,  55-79.
Tiemessen, I. H. W., Lane, M. M., Crossan & A. C. Inkpen. (1997). Knowledge management in international joint ventures” . In P. Beamish and J. Killings  (eds.), Cooperative Strategies, North American Perspectives. New Lexington Press, San Francisco, CA, 370–399.
von Hippel, E. (1994). Sticky information and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation. Management Science, 40(4), 429–439.
Wang, P., Tong, T. W.,  & Koh, C. P. (2004). An integrated model of knowledge transfer from MNC parent to China subsidiary. Journal of World Business, 39,  168-182.
Williams, L. J., & J. T. Hazer. (1986). Antecedents and Consequences of satisfaction and commitment in turnover model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(2),  219-231.
Zack, H. (1999). Managing codified knowledge. Sloan Management Review, 40(4),  45-58.
Zander, U. (1991). Exploiting a Technological Edge: Voluntary and Involuntary Dissemination of Technology. Institute of International Business, Stockholm.
論文全文使用權限
校內
校內紙本論文立即公開
同意電子論文全文授權校園內公開
校內電子論文立即公開
校外
同意授權
校外電子論文立即公開

如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信