淡江大學覺生紀念圖書館 (TKU Library)
進階搜尋


下載電子全文限經由淡江IP使用) 
系統識別號 U0002-1308201215110700
中文論文名稱 瑪格麗特.愛特伍《使女的故事》與《末世男女》對人類理性主義畸形發展之諷刺
英文論文名稱 The Satire of the Maldevelopment of Human Rationalism in Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale and Oryx and Crake
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中) 英文學系博士班
系所名稱(英) Department of English
學年度 100
學期 2
出版年 101
研究生中文姓名 蔡曉晴
研究生英文姓名 Sincere Hsiao-Ching Tsai
學號 895110152
學位類別 博士
語文別 英文
口試日期 2012-07-03
論文頁數 218頁
口試委員 指導教授-黃逸民
委員-海柏
委員-黃心雅
委員-楊銘塗
委員-蔡振興
中文關鍵字 畸形發展  理性主義  生態女性主義  不可預測性  諷刺 
英文關鍵字 satire  maldevelopment  rationalism  ecofeminism  randomness 
學科別分類
中文摘要 本論文旨在探討瑪格麗特.愛特伍小說《使女的故事》與《末世男女》對人類理性主義畸形發展之諷刺與批判。透過諷刺筆法,作者呈現出畸形發展的人性導致畸形發展的人類理性主義,並因此造成人類對自然環境、生態系統、和人類社會的畸形發展,導致地球環境和人文社會的破壞。本論文使用生態女性觀點,分析比較這兩本小說所呈現的諷刺批判意涵,顯示人類濫用理性主義所引起的生態危機。
引言的部分解釋本人撰寫論文的動機和相關議題。第一章簡介論文的主題,包括諷刺小說的運用和目的,並解釋人類理性主義和生態女性主義的發展與脈絡。首先探討愛特伍如何使用諷刺筆法嘲弄當代現象,並藉此呈現出人類理性的畸形發展。之後本論文使用生態女性主義觀點分析這兩本小說,批判當代政治、社會、經濟、科技等相關議題,並提出人類和自然環境和諧共處、共存共榮的方法。第三部份著重在不可預測性的顛覆力量。這股長久以來被忽視的力量,往往在破壞與重建人類社會和世界時扮演著關鍵的角色。藉由這兩本小說的開放結局,作者在不可預測性當中仍然指出了希望。
第二章探討《使女的故事》裡人類理性主義的畸形發展和批判。小說裡的統治階級,也就是大主教們,建立一個神權統治的軍政府,致力控制女性和自然的生育力,並且企圖整治人類社會和生態環境的破壞,結果卻是徒勞無功。小說以諷刺筆法揭露那些大主教偽善的外衣,描繪他們濫用宗教、政治、法律等力量來懸置人權、物化女性,實則為了滿足私欲,並呈現出人類理性主義的畸形發展將導致功用取向的反烏托邦社會,並帶來更深的毀滅。
第三章探討《末世男女》裡人類理性主義的畸形發展和批判。小說呈現的當代社會中,人們盲目崇拜科學科技,過度重視資本積累,卻忽視人文思想和生態危機,導致人類社會的不平衡發展。這種科學和資本主義的畸形發展帶來利益取向的社會,並且在全球化的推波助瀾之下,最終導致世界末日的毀滅。作者諧擬聖經故事,重新講述末日和創世紀,帶給讀者警語與想像。
結論的部分批判比較兩本小說中人類理性主義的畸形發展,並指出不可預測性的顛覆力量。無論是《使女的故事》中的大主教,還是《末世男女》中的瘋狂科學家,他們畸形發展與濫用理性主義來滿足私欲,卻缺少人文思想;而向來被忽略的女性和自然的力量卻可以顛覆瓦解他們縝密的計劃。除此之外,當代生態環境和人類社會屢遭破壞,而生態女性主義觀點卻可幫助人類和自然建立和諧共榮的永續關係。藉由發展更寬廣多元的思維,並且節制欲望,人們就可以建立一個更美好的社會。
英文摘要 The focus of this dissertation is an analysis of Margaret Atwood’s criticism of rationalism through the use of satire, showing that the maldevelopment of human nature results in the maldevelopment of natural environments, ecosystems, and human societies leading to the degradation of the earth and causing many social problems in the world. In this dissertation, I use an eco-feminist perspective to analyze and compare the satiric messages and meanings in the two novels of Atwood, The Handmaid’s Tale and Oryx and Crake. Using such a critique, it becomes clear that Atwood’s novels satirically reveal how ecological problems derive mainly from the excesses of human nature manifested in the very institutions human beings have developed in the exercise of their excessive rationalism.
I explain my motivation and concerns of this dissertation in the Introduction. Chapter One is an introduction of my focuses, including satire, human rationalism, ecofeminism, and theoretical background. Firstly, I would like to analyze how Atwood uses a satirical approach to ridicule modern phenomena and important issues, thereby revealing the maldevelopment of human rationalism. Secondly, I would like to analyze the two novels using an eco-feminist perspective, which provides insight into socio-political, economical, scientific, and technological problems, as well as indicates a way to restore a harmonious relationship between human beings and nature. The third point of analysis is the power of randomness and its subversive power in the deconstruction and reconstruction of the world and human society. With the open endings of the two novels, Atwood suggests hope for people in random possibilities instead of in rationalism.
Chapter Two provides an analysis of the maldevelopment of human rationalism in Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale. The novel portrays the failed efforts of the Commanders, the ruling class, to set up a theocratic military government in order to fix the problems of infertility in women and nature, as well as to reverse the social ecological degradations of the world. In this part, I would like to analyze the maldevelopment of the religion of the Commanders first, and then discuss how they pervert politics and laws to suspend human rights and objectify the female body. Atwood shows how the maldevelopment of human rationalism can lead to a function-oriented dystopia and bring further destruction.
Chapter Three is an analysis of the maldevelopment of human rationalism in Oryx and Crake. In this part, I analyze how the maldevelopment of science and capitalism (human rationalism) brings forth an unbalanced profit-oriented society and eventually leads to the extreme catastrophe of the Red Death. As a modern satire of biblical stories, Atwood’s novel parodies the stories of Genesis and provides prophetic warnings to its readers.
In my conclusion, I criticize the maldevelopments that ensue from human rationalism in the two novels, and highlight the power of randomness. Furthermore, I suggest some ways that the eco-feminist perspective can help human beings forge a more harmonious relationship between themselves and nature in order to deal with the social ecological degradations of the world in modern societies. With moral pluralism and limited human desires, people can set up a more well-rounded society.
論文目次 Table of Contents
Introduction 1
Chapter One
Satire, Human Rationalism, and Ecofeminism 8
Chapter Two
The Maldevelopment of Human Rationalism in Margaret
Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale 34
The Suspension of Human Rights 48
The Objectification of the Female Body 78
The Subversive Power of Randomness 92
Chapter Three
The Maldevelopment of Human Rationalism in Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake 120
The Dominant Power of the Science/Technology Compounds 131
The Manipulation of Nature 156
Problems of New Commodities: Human Desire and Maldevelopment 172
The Power of Randomness 189
Conclusion 202
Works Cited 209
參考文獻 Works Cited

Adamson, Joni. American Indian Literature, Environmental Justice, and Ecocriticism: The Middle Place. Tucson: U of Arizona P, 2001. Print.
Adamson, Joni, Mei Mei Evans, and Rachel Stein, ed. The Environmental Justice Reader: Politics, Poetics, and Pedagogy. Tucson: U of Arizona P, 2002. Print.
Agamben, Giorgio. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Trans. Daniel Heller-Roazen. Stanford, California: Stanford UP, 1998. Print.
---. State of Exception. Trans. Kevin Attell. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2005. Print.
Althusser, Louis. “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses (Notes towards an Investigation).” Lenin and Philosophy, and Other Essays. Intro. Frederic Jameson. Trans. Ben Brewster. New York: Monthly Review, 2001, c1971. 127-186. Print.
Amin, Samir. Capitalism in the Age of Globalization: The Management of Contemporary Society. New Jersey: Zed, 1997. Print.
---. Maldevelopment: Anatomy of a Global Failure. Trans. Michael Wolfers. New Jersey: Zed, 1990. Print.
Appadurai, Arjun. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis, Minn.: U of Minnesota P, c1996. Print.
---. “Grassroots Globalization and the Research Imagination.” Globalization. Ed. Arjun Appadurai. London: Duke UP, 2001. 1-21. Print.
Atwood, Margaret. The Handmaid’s Tale. New York: Anchor, 1998. Print.
---. Oryx and Crake. New York: Anchor, 2004. Print.
“Baptists.” Religion Facts. Web. 6 February 2012.
Barry, John. Environment and Social Theory. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge, 2007. Print.
Barry, Peter. “Ecocriticism.” Beginning Theory: An Introduction to Literary and Cultural Theory. Manchester: Manchester UP, 2002. Print.
Baudrillard, Jean. The Consumer Society: Myths and Structures. London: Sage, 1998. Print.
Bates, Karen Grigsby. “Bibi Aisha, Disfigured Afghan Woman Featured On ‘Time’Cover, Visits U.S.” The Two-Way: NPR Blog. 13 October 2010. Web. 2 March 2012.
Beck, Ulrich. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage, 1992. Print.
Benjamin, Walter. “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction.” Illuminations. Ed. and intro. Hannah Arendt. Trans. Harry Zohn. London: Fontana, 1992. 211-244. Print.
Buell, Frederick. From Apocalypse to Way of Life: Environmental Crisis in the American Century. New York: Routledge, 2003. Print.
Buell, Lawrence. The Environmental Imagination: Thoreau, Nature Writing, and the Formation of American Culture. Cambridge: Belknap of Harvard UP, 1995. Print.
---. The Future of Environmental Criticism: Environmental Crisis and Literary Imagination. Oxford: Blackwell, 2005. Print.
Calinescu, Matei. “The Idea of Modernity.” Five Faces of Modernity: Modernism, Avant-Garde, Decadence, Kitsch, Postmodernism. Durham: U of Duke P, 1987. 15-92. Print.
Campbell, Sueellen. “The Land and Language of Desire: Where Deep Ecology and Post-Structuralism Meet.” Glotfelty and Fromm. 124-136.
Carlson, Allen and Sheila Lintott, ed. Nature, Aesthetics, and Environmentalism: From Beauty to Dudy. New York: Columbia U.P., 2007. Print.
Chen, Shih-Ying. “Fluidity of Power in Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale: A Foucauldian Perspective.” MA thesis. National Chengchi University, 2003. Print.
Cirlot, J. E. A Dictionary of Symbols. Trans. Jack Sage. Taipei: Bookman, 1962. Print.
“Citing Rising Death Toll, UN Urges Better Protection of Afghan Civilians.” UN News Center. 9 March 2011. Web. 12 March 2012.
Cixous, Hélène. “Sorties.” Marks and de Courtivron. 90-98.
---. “The Laugh of the Medusa.” Marks and de Courtivron. 245-264.
Diamanti-Kandarakis E, et al. “Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals: An Endocrine Society Scientific Statement.” Endocrine Reviews 30(4): 293-342, 2009. Web. 15 April 2012.
DiMarco, Danette. “Paradice Lost, Paradise Regained: Homo Faber and the Makings of a New Beginning in Oryx and Crake.” Papers on Language & Literature 41.2 (2005): 170. Academic OneFile. Web. 10 July 2012.
Dobson, Andrew. Green Political Thought. London: Routledge, 1995. Print.
Duncan, Nancy. “Renegotiating Gender and Sexuality in Public and Private Spaces.” Bodyspace: Destablizing Geographies of Gender and Sexuality. Ed. Nancy Duncan. New York: Routledge, 1996. 127-145. Print.
Easthope, Antony and Kate McGowan, ed. A Critical and Cultural Theory Reader. Buckingham: U of Open P, 1992. Print.
Eaton, Marcia Muelder. “The Beauty That Requires Health.” Carlson and Lintott. 339-362.
Elliott, Robert C. “Satire.” Encyclopædia Britannica Online. Encyclopædia Britannica Inc., 2012. Web. 11 March 2012.
Emerson, Ralph Waldo. “The Nature of Beauty.” Carlson and Lintott. 49-53.
The End of Poverty? Dir. and writer. Philippe Diaz. Perf. Beth Portello. [Canoga Park, Calif.]; Taipei: Cinema Libre Studio for the Blu-ray; Hui Hong, c2011. DVD.
Fisher, Andy. “Beginning with Experience.” Radical Ecopsychology: Psychology in the Service of Life. New York: U of New York P, 2002. 51-89. Print.
Food, Inc. Dir. Robert Kenner. [Australia]; Taipei: Roadshow Entertainment [distributor]; Wei Sheng, 2009. DVD.
Foster, Hal, ed. The Anti-Aesthetic: Essays on Postmodern Culture. Port Townsend, WA: Bay, 1983. Print.
Foucault, Michel. Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason. Trans. Richard Howard. New York: Vintage, 1988. Print.
---. “What Is Enlightenment?” The Foucault Reader. Ed. Paul Rabinow. London: Penguin, 1991, c1984. 32-50. Print.
Francioni, Francesco, ed. Environment, Human Rights and International Trade. Oregon: Hart, 2001. Print.
Gaard, Greta, ed. Ecofeminism: Women, Animals, Nature. Philadelphia: Temple UP, 1993. Print.
Gaard, Greta and Lori Gruen. “Ecofeminism: Toward Global Justice and Planetary Health.” Zimmerman et al. 155-177.
Gaard, Greta and Patrick D. Murphy, ed. Ecofeminist Literary Criticism: Theory, Interpretation, Pedagogy. Chicago: U of Illinois P, 1998. Print.
Garrad, Greg. Ecocriticism. London: Routledge, 2004. Print.
Giddens, Anthony. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Stanford, Calif.: U of Stanford P, 1991. Print.
Glotfelty, Cheryll and Harold Fromm, ed. The Ecocriticism Reader: Landmarks in Literary Ecology. London: U of Georgia P, 1996. Print.
Gramsci, Antonio. “Hegemony, Intellectuals and the State.” Storey. 215-221.
Greenblatt, Stephen, general editor. The Norton Anthology of English Literature. Vol. 1. 8th ed. New York: Norton, c2006. Print.
Habermas, Jurgen. “Modernity—An Incomplete Project.” Foster. 3-15.
Haraway, Donna Jeanne. “A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology and Socialist-Feminism in the Last Twentieth Century.” Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: the Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge, 1991. 147-181. Print.
---. “The Promises of Monsters: a Regenerative Politics for Inappropriate/d Other.” The Haraway Reader. New York: Routledge, 2004. 63-124. Print.
Hardt, Michael and Antonio Negri. Empire. Cambridge: U of Harvard P, 2001, c2000. Print.
Harvey, David. Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference. Oxford: Blackwell, 1996. Print.
---. The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Oxford: Blackwell, 1990, c1989. Print.
---. “The Environment of Justice.” In Living with Nature: Environmental Politics As Cultural Discourse. Ed. Frank Fischer and Marrten A. Hajer. New York: Oxford UP, 1999. 153-185. Print.
Hutcheon, Linda. “Telling Stories: Fiction and History.”Modernism/Postmodernism. Ed. and Intro. Peter Brooker. New York: Longman, 1992. Print.
“Jezebel.” 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica. Wikisource. Web. 10 March 2012.
Kellert, Stephen H. In the Wake of Chaos: Unpredictable Order in Dynamical Systems. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1993.
Kristeva, Julia. Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. Ed. Leon S. Roudiez. Trans. Thomas Gora, Alice Jardine, and Leon Roudiez. New York: Columbia UP, 1980. Print.
---. Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection. Trans. Leon S. Roudiez. New York: Columbia UP, 1982. Print.
---. “Woman Can Never Be Defined.” Marks and de Courtivron. 137-141.
Kryder, Rowena Pattee. Sacred Ground to Sacred Space: Visionary Ecology, Perennial Wisdom, Environmental Ritual and Art. Santa Fe: Bear and Company, 1994. Print.
Lacey, A.R. A Dictionary of Philosophy. 2nd ed. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1986. Print.
Lash, Scott. Another Modernity, A Different Rationality. Malden, Mass: Blackwell 1999. Print.
Latour, Bruno. Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Trans. Catherine Porter. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 2004. Print.
Lestienne, Rémy. The Creative Power of Chance. Trans. E.C. Neher. Urbana: U of Illinois P, c1998. Print.
Lin, Yi-jun. “A Generic Study of Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale: From a Feminist Utopian Perspective.” MA thesis. Soochow University, 2005. Print.
Lindberg, David C. and Ronald L. Numbers. God and Nature: Historical Essays on the Encounter between Christianity and Science. Berkeley: U of California P, 1986. Print.
Lukacs, Georg. “Reification and the Consciousness of the Proletariat.” History and Class Consciousness: Studies in Marxist Dialectics. Trans. Rodney Livingstone. Boston: MIT, 2000, c1971. 83-222. Print.
---. The Theory of the Novel: A Historical-Philosophical Essay on the Forms of Great Epic Literature. Trans. Anna Bostock. United States: MIT, 1996. Print.
“Maldevelopment.” Miller-Keane Encyclopedia and Dictionary of Medicine, Nursing, and Allied Health, Seventh Edition. The Free Dictionary. Web. 2 March 2012.
Manes, Christopher. “Nature and Silence.” Glotfelty and Fromm. 15-29.
Marks, Elaine and Isabelle de Courtivron, ed. and intro. New French Feminisms: An Anthology. New York: Schocken, 1981. Print.
Marx, Karl. “The German Ideology.” The Marx-Engels Reader. 2nd edition. Ed. Robert C Tucker. New York: Norton, 1978. 146-200. Print.
---. “Ruling Class and Ruling Ideas.” Storey. 196-197.
Marx, Karl and Friedrich Engels. Capital. Chicago: Encyclopdia Britannica, 1986, c1952. Print.
Merchant, Carolyn. The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution. New York: Harper Collins, 1989. Print.
---. Reinventing Eden: The Fate of Nature in Western Culture. New York: Routledge, 2004. Print.
Mies, Maria. “The Myth of Catching-up Development.” Mies and Shiva. 55-69.
Mies, Maria and Vandana Shiva. Ecofeminism. London: Zed, 1993. Print.
Nast, Heidi J. and Steve Pile, ed. Placed Through the Body. London: Routledge, 1998. Print.
Nietzsche, Friedrich. Thus Spoke Zarathustra: a Book for Everyone and No One. Trans. and intro. R.J. Hollingdale. Baltimore: Penguin, 1969. Print.
Oelschlaeger, Max, ed. Postmodern Environmental Ethics. Albany: U of New York P, 1995. Print.
Partridge, Ernest. “With Liberty for Some: A Liberal Critique of Libertarian Environmental Policy.” Zimmerman et al. 430-449.
Pepper, David. Eco-Socialsim: From Deep Ecology to Social Justice. London: Routledge, 1993. Print.
Plumwood, Val. Environmental Culture: The Ecological Crisis of Reason. London: Routledge, 2002. Print.
---. Feminism and the Mastery of Nature. London: Routledge, 1993. Print.
Postman, Neil. Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business. New York: Penguin, 1985. Print.
“Randomness.” The Free Online Dictionary, Thesaurus and Encyclopedia. Web. 2 March 2012.
Reich, John. Culture and Values. New York: Harcourt Brace, 1998. Print.
Room, Adrian. Who’s Who in Classical Mythology. New York: Gramercy, 2003. Print.
Rueckert, William. “Literature and Ecology: An Experiment in Ecocriticism.” Glotfelty and Fromm. 105-123.
Sachs, Jeffrey D. The End of Poverty: Economic Possibilities for Our Time. New York: Penguin, 2005. Print.
Schopenhauer, Arthur. The World As Will and Representation. Vol. 1 and 2. Trans. E. F. J. Payne. New York: Dover, c1969. Print.
Shiva, Vandana. Earth Democracy: Justice, Sustainability, and Peace. Cambridge: South End, 2005. Print.
---. “The Impoverishment of the Environment: Women and Children Last.” Mies and Shiva. 70-90.
---. Monocultures of the Mind: Perspectives on Biodiversity and Biotechnology. London: Zed, 1993. Print.
---. Staying Alive: Women, Ecology, and Development. London: Zed, 1990. Print.
Smith, Andy. “Ecofeminism Through an Anticolonial Framework.” Warren ed. 21-37.
Smith, Mick. An Ethics of Place: Radical Ecology, Postmodernity, and Social Theory. Albany: U of New York P, 2001. Print.
Smith, Philip. Cultural Theory: an Introduction. Malden: Blackwell, 2001. Print.
Soper, Kate. What Is Nature? Culture, Politics, and Non-Human. Oxford: Blackwell, 1995. Print.
Soule, Michael E. and Gary Lease, ed. Reinventing Nature? Responses to Postmodern Deconstruction. Washington, D.C.: Island, 1995. Print.
Storey, John, ed. and intro. Cultural Theory and Popular Culture: A Reader. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1994. Print.
Svendsen, Lars Fr. H. A Philosophy of Fear. Trans. John Irons. London: Reaktion, 2008. Print.
Sylvan (Routley), Richard. “Is There a Need for a New, an Environmental, Ethic?”Zimmerman et al. 16-24.
Taleb, Nassim Nicholas. The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable. New York: Random, c2007. Print.
---. Fooled by Randomness: The Hidden Role of Chance in Life and in the Markets. 2nd Ed., updated. New York: Random, 2005.
Tsao, Chun-Ning. “Dystopia and Ecocriticism in Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake.” MA thesis. Chinese Culture University, 2009. Print.
Taso, Yen Luang. “The Idea of Mode Production and Irigarian Female Body: On Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale.” MA thesis. National Changhua University of Education, 2008. Print.
Tong, Rosemarie. Feminist Thought: A Comprehensive Introduction. London: Routledge, 1993. Print.
Vico, Giambattista. The New Science of Giambattista Vico. Ithaca: U of Cornell P, 1984. Print.
Voltaire. Candide. Trans. and ed. Peter Gay. New York : St. Martin’s, c1963. Print.
Warren, Karen J., ed. Ecofeminism: Women, Culture, Nature. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1997. Print.
---. Ecofeminist Philosophy: A Western Perspective on What It Is and Why It Matters. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2000. Print.
---. Ecological Feminism. London: Routledge, 1994. Print.
---. “The Power and the Promise of Ecofeminism, Revisited.” Zimmerman et al. 252-79.
Watts, Duncan J. Small Worlds: The Dynamics of Networks Between Order and Randomness. Princeton, NJ.: Princeton UP, c1999. Print.
Williams, Raymond. “The Analysis of Culture.” Storey. 56-64.
---. Marxism and Literature. Oxford: U of Oxford P, 1977. Print.
Woolf, Virginia. A Room of One’s Own. Middlesex: Penguin, 1945. Print.
Yen, Shu-Chun. “Are Humans ‘Monkeys?’ Margaret Atwood’s Satirical Criticism of Biological Reductionism in Oryx and Crake.” MA thesis. Tamkang University, 2004. Print.
Zarrilli, Simonetta. “International Trade in Genetically Modified Organisms and Multilateral Negotiations: a New Dilemma for Developing Countries.”Francioni. 39-86.
Zimmerman, Michael E., et al. Environmental Philosophy: From Animal Rights to Radical Ecology. Fourth edition. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2005. Print.

論文使用權限
  • 同意紙本無償授權給館內讀者為學術之目的重製使用,於2012-08-20公開。
  • 同意授權瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2012-08-20起公開。


  • 若您有任何疑問,請與我們聯絡!
    圖書館: 請來電 (02)2621-5656 轉 2281 或 來信