§ 瀏覽學位論文書目資料
  
系統識別號 U0002-1307200512233400
DOI 10.6846/TKU.2005.00224
論文名稱(中文) 品牌權益和製造來源國影響力之研究-以FCB模式分析
論文名稱(英文) The Effect of Brand and Country of Manufacture -An Analysis Based on FCB Model
第三語言論文名稱
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中文) 國際貿易學系國際企業學碩士班
系所名稱(英文) Department of International Trade
外國學位學校名稱
外國學位學院名稱
外國學位研究所名稱
學年度 93
學期 2
出版年 94
研究生(中文) 楊爵光
研究生(英文) Chueh-Kuang Yang
學號 692481459
學位類別 碩士
語言別 繁體中文
第二語言別
口試日期 2005-05-12
論文頁數 95頁
口試委員 指導教授 - 張俊惠
委員 - 梁文貴
委員 - 蔡政言
關鍵字(中) 品牌權益
製造來源國
FCB模式
關鍵字(英) Brand Equity
Country of Manufacture
FCB Model
第三語言關鍵字
學科別分類
中文摘要
由於品牌權益和製造來源國皆為消費者在進行購買決策時的重要變數,因此本研究輔以FCB模式作為分類性的干擾變數,將產品分類至FCB模式的四個象限下,探討消費者在進行購買決策時,是以品牌權益為主,亦或以製造來源國為重,會不會因為在不同象限下而有所差異?
本研究以淡江大學商學院日間部學生為研究對象,採用問卷調查方式蒐集資料,共計742份有效問卷。分析客體為大學生常用之產品,分別為筆記型電腦、手機、洗髮精、啤酒和速食麵。在干擾變數(FCB模式)方面是以單因子多變量變異數分析將不同產品分類至FCB模式象限下,其結果為:高涉入/理性產品為筆記型電腦、手機,高涉入/感性產品為洗髮精,低涉入/感性產品為啤酒、速食麵;主要變數(品牌權益和製造來源國)的權重方面,是以平均權重來進行比較。本研究在不同FCB模式象限下,得出研究分析結果與發現描述如下:
1.高涉入/理性的產品:品牌權益方面,消費者最在意產品的知覺品質,其次是品牌在消費者心目中的良好形象;製造來源國方面,消費者會選擇售後服務和品質穩定良好的國家。
2.高涉入/感性的產品:品牌權益方面,消費者最在意產品的知覺品質,其次是品牌在消費者心目中的良好形象;製造來源國方面,消費者在意的是製造來源國的品質穩定外,製造來源國的聲譽亦是考量因素。
3.低涉入/感性的產品:品牌權益方面,消費者除了在意知覺品質和對品牌感到信賴外,品牌知名度亦是消費者的考量因素;製造來源國方面,消費者會考量生產品質穩定並享富盛名的國家。
英文摘要
Brand equity and country of manufacture are critical variables when consumers making purchase decision. Therefore, this study regards FCB model as categorical moderator. Products are classed as four quadrants in FCB model. This study discusses which one is more important between Brand equity and country of manufacture to effect purchase decision.
    742 valid response data were collected from the students of College of Business in Tamkang University and we employed questionnaire to collect data. Analysis objectives are notebook, mobile phone, shampoo, beer and instant noodle which are popular products to college students. This study use 1-way MANOVA to classify notebook and mobile phone as high involvement/rationality, shampoo as high involvement/affectivity, beer and instant noodle as low/affectivity. Finally, we compare the weight between brand equity and country of manufacture in different quadrants of FCB model. The results summarized as follows:
    1. The product of high involvement/rationality: In the aspect of brand equity, consumers mostly concern perceived quality, secondly concern brand association; In the aspect of country of manufacture, consumers could be choose the country having a good sale service and stable quality.
    2. The product of high involvement/affectivity: In the aspect of brand equity, consumers mostly concern perceived quality, secondly concern brand association; In the aspect of country of manufacture, consumers care about the country having an excellent reputation and stable quality.
    3. The product of low involvement/affectivity: In the aspect of brand equity, consumers mostly concern perceived quality and brand association, secondly concern brand awareness; In the aspect of country of manufacture, consumers could be choose well-known country which having ability to product steadily.
第三語言摘要
論文目次
第一章  緒論	 1
第一節  研究動機 	1
第二節	研究目的 	3
第三節	研究範圍及對象 	4
第四節	研究流程 	5
本章註釋	6
第二章  文獻探討	 7
第一節	品牌權益之相關文獻 	7
第二節	製造來源國之相關文獻 	22
第三節  FCB模式之相關文獻 	26
第三章  研究設計與方法 	32
苐一節  觀念性架構 	32
第二節	研究變數操作性定義	33
第三節 分析性架構 	37
第四節  研究流程和分析方法 	38
第五節 問卷設計與抽樣設計 	42
第六節	信度分析 	45
第四章	資料分析與結果	 47
第一節 樣本資料分析 	47
第二節  「涉入」和「理性/感性」構面強度指標之構建 	49
第三節  產品定位分析 	54
第四節  FCB模型下品牌權益和製造來源國權重之實証分析 	59
第五章  結論與策略意涵 	68
第一節  研究發現與結論 	68
第二節 策略意涵 	71
第三節	後續研究建議 	73
本章註釋	74
參考文獻	 75
附錄  正式問卷   81

表1-3-1  研究範疇	4
表2-1-1  品牌權益之定義	8
表2-1-2  Aaker品牌權益十項衡量指標	20
表2-2-1  來源國之定義	22
表2-2-2  來源國之衡量構面	24
表3-2-1  製造來源國屬性之操作性定義	33
表3-2-2  品牌權益構面之操作性定義	34
表3-2-3  FCB模型之操作性定義	35
表3-6-1  問卷之信度分析	46
表4-1-1  實際抽樣結果	47
表4-1-2  樣本特微描述	48
表4-2-1  涉入均值	49
表4-2-2  理性/感性之驗証性因素分析模式配適度指標	52
表4-2-3  理性/感性驗證性因素分析參數估計表	53
表4-3-1 涉入及理性/感性均值排序	54
表4-3-2 涉入及理性/感性之假說檢定結果	55
表4-3-3  涉入成偶檢定	56
表4-3-4  涉入對比檢定	56
表4-3-5  理性/感性成偶檢定	57
表4-3-6  理性/感性對比檢定	58
表4-4-1  品牌權益和製造來源國權重加總	59
表4-4-2  產品別之品牌權益和製造來源國權重	60
表4-4-3  FCB模型之品牌權益和製造來源國權重	61
表4-4-4  品牌權益平均權重和製造來源國平均權重	62
表4-4-5  FCB構面和品牌權益構面之平均權重	63
表4-4-6  FCB構面和製造來源國屬性之平均權重	65

圖1-4-1  本研究流程與步驟	5
圖2-1-1  品牌知識構面	13
圖2-1-2  品牌權益之架構	17
圖2-3-1  FCB 模型之基本架構	26
圖3-1-1  觀念性架構	32
圖3-3-1  分析性架構	37
圖3-4-1  1-Way MANOVA 之檢定流程	40
圖4-2-1  理性/感性量表二階驗證性因素分析模式	51
圖4-3-1  涉入成偶檢定	56
圖4-3-2  理性/感性成偶檢定	57
圖4-3-3  FCB模型之產品定位圖	58
圖4-4-1  品牌權益和製造來源國權重連續帶-產品別	61
圖4-4-2  品牌權益和製造來源國權重連續帶-FCB構面別	62
圖4-4-3  FCB構面和品牌權益構面之平均權重	65
圖4-4-4  FCB構面和製造來源國屬性之平均權重	67
參考文獻
一、	中文部份
尤浚豪(2003),「FCB模式對廣告溝通效果之研究」,淡江大學國際企業學研究所碩士論文。
李奇勳(2001),「價格、保證及來源國形象對產品評價與購買意願的影響」,成功大學企業管理研究所博士論文。
呂錦棠(2003),「品牌形象與來源國形象關係之研究-產品屬性效果之探討」,元智大學管理研究所碩士論文。
沈雲驄、湯宗勳(1998),品牌行銷法則,商周。
周文賢(2002),多變量統計分析,智勝。
吳克振譯(1998),品牌管理,台北:華泰。
邱琦閔(2002),「品牌來源國變更效應之研究-製造國形象及品牌與國家聯結程度之干擾影響」,元智大學管理研究所碩士論文。
邱皓政(2003),結構方程模式:LISREL的理論、技術與應用,台北:雙葉。
高登第譯(2001),品牌管理,台北:天下。
高登第譯(2002),品牌領導,台北:天下。
馬繼康(2000),廣告學Q&A,風雲論壇。
陳秋雲(2002),「廣告代言人與FCB模型之廣告效果研究」,淡江大學國際企業學研究所碩士論文。
陳順宇(2000),多變量分析,台北:華泰。
張俊惠(1987),「產品涉入剖面之研究」,淡江大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
游純瑜(2002),「混合產品來源國資訊組合效果之研究-產品種類之干擾影響」,元智大學管理研究所碩士論文。
曾瑞媛(2001),「品牌來源國及品牌權益影響消費者購買產品及服務意願之研究」,真理大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
趙琪(1988),「FCB模式之研究-『涉入』與『理性/感性』二構面之整合性探討」,淡江大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。

二、	英文部份
Aaker, David A. (1991), “Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name,” The Free Press, N.Y.
Aaker, David A. (1992), “Managing Brand Equity,” Journal of Business Strategy, 131-145.
Aaker, David A. (1992), “The Value of Brand Equity,” Journal of Business Strategy, 13(4), 27-32.
Aaker, David A. (1996), “Measuring Brand Equity across Products and Markets,” California Management Review, 38(3), 102-120.
Aaker, David A. and K. L. Keller (1990), “Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extensions,” Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 27-41.
Ashill, J. N. and A. Sinha (2004), “An Exploratory Study into the Impact of Components of Brand Equity and Country of Origin Effects on Purchase Intention,” Journal of Asia - Pacific Business, 5(3), 27-32.
Barney, J. (1991), “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage,” Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
Barwise, P. (1993), “Brand Equity: Snark or Boojum,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 10(1), 93-104.
Berger, D. (1981), “A Retrospective: FCB Recall Study,” Advertising Age, 52(45), 1-3.
Berger, D. (1985), “The FCB Grid,” Proceedings of The Advertising Research Foundation 31st Annual Conferences, 1-16.
Biel, A. L. (1992), “How Brand Image Drive Brand Equity,” Journal of Advertising Research, 32(6), 6-12.
Bilkey, W. J. and E. Nes (1982), “Country-of-Origin Effects on Products Evaluations,” Journal of International Business Studies, 13(1), 89-99.
Bloch, P. H. and M. L. Richins (1983), “A Theoretical Model for the Study of Product Importance Perceptions,” Journal of Marketing, 47(3), 69-81.
Bloch, P. H. and M. L. Richins (1986), “After the New Wears Off: The Temporal Context of Product Involvement,” Journal of Consumer Research, 13(2), 280-285.
Brasco, T. C. (1988), “How Brand Name are Valued for Acquisitions,” Marketing Science Institute, 88-104.
Chao, P. (1993), “Partitioning Country of Origin Effects: Consumer Evaluations of a Hybrid Product,” Journal of International Business Studies, 24(2), 291-304.
Dunn, M. and S. Davis (2003), “Building Brands from the Inside,” Marketing Management, 12(3), 32-37.
Farquhar, P. H. (1990), “Managing Brand Equity,” Journal of Advertising Research, 30(4), 7-12.
Han, C. M. (1989), “Country Image: Halo or Summary Construct?” Journal of Marketing Research, 26(2), 222-229.
Han, C. M. and V. Terpstra (1988), “Country-of-Origin Effects for Uni-National and Bi-National Products,” Journal of International Business Studies, 19(2), 235-255. 
Hirschman, E. C. and Holbrook M. B. (1982), “Hedonic Consumption: Emerging Concepts, Methods and Propositions,” Journal of Marketing, 46(3), 92-101.
Houston, M. J. and M. L. Rothschild (1977), “A Paradigm for Research on Consumer Involvement,” Unpublished Working Paper, 11(77), 46-49.
Insch, G. S. and B. J. McBride (1998), “Decomposing the Country-of-Origin Construct: An Empirical Test of Country of Design, Country of Parts and Country of Assembly,” Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 10(4), 69-91.
Iyer, G. R., and J. K. Kalita(1997), “The Impact of Country-of-Origin and Country-of-Manufacture Clues on Consumer Perceptions of Quality and Value,” Journal of Global Marketing, 11(1), 7-28.
Johansson, J. K. and I. D. Nebenzahl (1986), “Multinational Production: Effect on Brand Value,” Journal of International Business Studies, 17(3), 101-126.
Kamakura, W. and G. Russell (1993), “Measuring Brand Value with Scanner Data,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 10(9), 9-22.
Keller, K. L. (1998), Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring and Managing Brand Equity, Prentice-Hall.
Keller, K. L. and F. E. Webster (2004), “A Roadmap for Branding in Industrial Markets,” Journal of Brand Management, 11(5), 388-402.
Kim, P.(1990), “A Perspective on Brands,” Journal of Consumer Marketing, 7(4), 20-30.
Kolter, P. (1996), Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation and Control, Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall Inc.
Krugman, H. E. (1965), “The Impact of Television Advertising: Learning Without Involvement,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 29(1), 349-356.
Lassar, W., Mittal B. and A. Sharma (1995), “Measuring Customer-Based Brand Equity,” Journal of Consumer Marketing, 12(4), 11-19.
Leuthesser, L., C. Kohli and K. R. Harich (1995), “Brand Equity: The Halo Effect Measure,” European Journal of Marketing, 12(4), 11- 20.
Li, Zhan G. & Dant, Rajiv P.(1997), “Dimension of Product Quality and Country-of-Origin Effects Research,” Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 10(1), 93-112.
Lin, Chien-Huang and Danny T. Kao (2004), “The Impacts of Country-of-Origin on Brand Equity,” Journal of American Academy of Business, 5(1/2), 37-40.
Martin, Ingrid M, Eroglu, Sevgin (1993), “Measuring a Multi-dimensional construct: Country Image,” Journal of Business Research, 28(3), 191-210.
Mortimer, K. (2002), “Intergrating Advertising Theories with Conceptual Models of Services Advertising,” The Journal of Services Marketing, 16(5), 460-476.
Mullen, M. and A. Mainz (1989), “Brands, Bids and Balance Sheet: Putting a Price on Protected Products,” Acquisitions Monthly, 24(4), 26-27.
Nagashima, Akira (1970), “A Comparison of Japanese Business,” Journal of Marketing, 34(1), 68-74.
Nagashima, Akira(1977), “A Comparative 'MADE IN' Product Image Survey among Japanese Businessmen,” Journal of Marketing, 41(3), 95-108.
Park, C. S. and V. Srinivasan(1994), “A Survey-Based Method for Measuring and Understanding Brand Equity and its Extendibility,” Journal of Marketing Research, 31(5), 271-288.
Roth, M. S. and J. B. Romeo (1992), “Matching Product Category and Country Image Perceptions: A Framework for Managing Country-of-Origin Effects,” Journal of 
International Business Studies, 23(3), 477-497.
Rothschild, M. L. (1979), “Advertising Strategies ofr High and Low Involvement Situations,” Attitude Research Plays for High Stakes, 74-93.
Samiee, Saeed (1994), “Customer Evaluation of Product in a Global Market,” Journal of International Business Studies , 25(3), 579-604.
Schooler (1965), “Product Bias in the Central American Common Market,” Journal of Marketing Research, 2(1), 94-397
Schooler, R. D. and A. R. Wildt (1968), “Elasticity of Products Bias,” Journal of Marketing Research, 5(2), 78-81.
Simon, C. J. and M. W. Sullivan (1993), “The Measurement and Determinants of Brand Equity:A Financial Approach,” Marketing Science, 4(1), 66-71.
Stobart, Paul (1989), “Brand Valuation: A True and Fair View,” Accountancy, 104(1154), 27-28.
Tauber, E. M.(1988), “Brand Leverage: Strategy for Growth in a Cost-Control World,” Journal of Advertising Research, 28(4), 26-30.
Taylor, S. A., K. Celuch and S. Goodwin (2004), “The Importance of Brand Equity to Customer Loyalty,” The Journal of Product and Brand Management, 13(4/5), 217-220.
Teas, R. Kenneth and Sanjeev Agarwal (2000), “The Effect of Extrinsic Product Cues on Consumers’ Perceptions of Quality, Sacrifice, and Value,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science , 28(2), 278-90.
Vaughn, R. (1980), “How Advertising Works: A Planning Model,” Journal of Advertising Research, 20(5), 27-33.
Vaughn, R. (1986), “How Advertising Works: A Planning Model Revisited,” Journal of Advertising Research, 26(1), 57-63.
White, J. Dennis and Elise L. Truly (1989), “Price-Quality Integration in Warranty Evaluation,” Journal of Business Research , 19(1), 109-125.
Wood, W. A. (1960), “Psychological Dimensions of Consumer Decision,” Journal of Marketing, 24(1), 15-19.
Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1985), “Measuring the Involvement Construct,” Journal of Consumer Research, 12(3), 341-352.
Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1994), “The Personal Involvement Inventory: Reduction, Revision, and Application to Advertising,” Journal of Consumer Research, 23(4), 341-352.
Zeithaml, Valarie A. (1988), “Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence,” Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2-22.
論文全文使用權限
校內
紙本論文於授權書繳交後2年公開
同意電子論文全文授權校園內公開
校內電子論文立即公開
校外
同意授權
校外電子論文立即公開

如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信