§ 瀏覽學位論文書目資料
系統識別號 U0002-1306201723054800
DOI 10.6846/TKU.2017.00415
論文名稱(中文) 碳排放、環境認證與環境管理對企業價值的影響:台灣之實證
論文名稱(英文) The Effect of Carbon Emissions, Environmental Certification and Environmental Management on Firm Value: An Empirical Study of Taiwan
第三語言論文名稱
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中文) 會計學系碩士班
系所名稱(英文) Department of Accounting
外國學位學校名稱
外國學位學院名稱
外國學位研究所名稱
學年度 105
學期 2
出版年 106
研究生(中文) 張家恩
研究生(英文) Chia-En Chang
學號 603600023
學位類別 碩士
語言別 繁體中文
第二語言別
口試日期 2017-06-03
論文頁數 39頁
口試委員 指導教授 - 郭樂平(lopinkuo@gmail.com)
委員 - 楊志豪
委員 - 黃仕斌
關鍵字(中) 碳排放
環境管理
環境認證
資源寬裕理論
關鍵字(英) carbon emission
environmental management
environmental certification
Slack Resource Theory
第三語言關鍵字
學科別分類
中文摘要
跨政府氣候變遷小組(Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC))指出,全球暖化為人類行為累計的後果,且企業營運需為溫室氣體排放負很大的責任。從1990年至2013年統計可見,台灣人口只佔全球的0.6%,排出的二氧化碳(CO2)卻占全球排放量的3.6%,然而面對追求股東利益極大化的資本市場,企業所揭露之碳資訊、環境管理和環境認證是否會增進企業價值?本研究以2014年至2015年間,台灣上市之企業為研究對象,並使用全球報告倡議組織(Global Reporting Initiative,GRI),於2013年5月發布強調「重大性」議題揭露,且更相關、更可靠、更易使用之第四版(GRI G4)永續性報告指南作為環境管理評分的衡量,同時採用Tobit迴歸之縱橫資料模型分析。就整體樣本來看,不論企業財務表現,碳排放量資訊會負向顯著影響次期企業價值(ROE),此結果呼應國際研究,顯示碳排放資訊是不好的訊息。本研究發現一個有趣的現象,當企業財務表現較好(營收正成長)時,其碳排放、環境管理與環境認證資訊皆正向顯著影響次期之企業價值(Tobin’s Q和ROE),此結果符合資源寬裕理論(Slack Resource Theory),顯示財務表現好的企業,越能分配資源提升環境表現,當經理人達成股東託付的經濟永續目標時,揭露碳排放、環境管理和環境認證資訊,會顯著提升企業價值。本研究以台灣企業做為研究樣本,呼應國際研究,並採用全球主流使用之GRI G4指南,作為環境管理衡量之依據,並特別針對財務表現較佳的企業進行分析,以實務意涵來說,並非企業所有投入的綠色成本都會被肯定,唯有在經濟永續達成的基礎上,企業經理人若致力於同時揭露碳排量(非意欲產出的結果資訊)、環境管理(環境改善的過程面資訊)和外部環境認證(第三方公正客觀的保證確信資訊),將有助於降低資訊的不對稱,提升企業價值。
英文摘要
Statistics from 1990 to 2013 show that Taiwan accounts for only 0.6% of the world's population, but its carbon dioxide (CO2) emitted accounts for 3.6% of the global emissions. However, in the face of the capital market in which the maximization of shareholder interests is pursued, will the disclosure of carbon information, environmental management and environmental certification by an enterprise enhance its firm value? The research objects of this study are the Taiwanese listed companies from 2014 to 2015. To access and measure the environmental management, this study employs the issue by the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) in May 2013 along with the fourth edition (GRI G4) of Sustainability Report Guidelines which is more relevant and more reliable. At the same time, the Tobit Regression with Panel Data Model Analysis is adopted. Judging from the samples as a whole, the information of carbon emission will negatively affect the firm value (ROE). This result echoes the international studies and shows that carbon-emitting information is a bad message. An interesting phenomenon found in this study is that when the financial performance of an enterprise (with revenue growing) is better, then its information of carbon emission, environmental management and environmental certification will positively and significantly affect the firm value (Tobin's Q and ROE) more. This result conforms to the Slack Resource Theory and indicates that the enterprise with good financial performance is more capable of allocating the resources and enhancing the environmental performance. When a manager achieves the sustainable economic objectives entrusted by shareholders, the disclosure of carbon emission, environmental management and environmental certification will significantly enhance the firm value.
第三語言摘要
論文目次
中文摘要	I
英文摘要	II
目錄	III
表目錄	IV
圖目錄	V
第壹章	緒論	1
第一節 研究背景	1
第二節 研究動機與目的	2
第三節 研究架構流程	4
第貳章	文獻探討	7
第一節 碳排放資訊揭露與企業價值	7
第二節 環境管理揭露與企業價值	9
第三節 環境認證與企業價值	11
第參章	研究方法	14
第一節	觀念性架構	14
第二節	變數衡量及實證模型	15
第三節	樣本及資料來源	22
第四節	研究方法	23
第肆章	實證結果分析	24
第一節 敘述性統計	24
第二節 相關性分析	24
第三節 實證結果與額外分析	26
第伍章	結論與建議	31
第一節 研究結論	31
第二節研究貢獻	31
第三節 研究限制級建議	32
第四節 研究建議	32
第陸章	參考文獻	33

表目錄
表1:環境管理揭露評分表	16
表2:各變數之定義	21
表3:樣本數分布及產業別	23
表4:敘述性統計表	24
表5:相關性分析表(Tobin’s Q)	25
表6:相關性分析表(ROE)	25
表7:碳排放、環境認證以及環境管理對企業價值(Tobin’s Q)之迴歸分析表	26
表8:碳排放、環境認證以及環境管理對企業價值(ROE)之迴歸分析表	28
表9:假說結果彙整表	30

圖目錄
圖1:研究流程圖	6
圖2:觀念性架構	14
參考文獻
中文文獻
王茂昌,2015,環境資訊揭露具價值攸關性嗎?—以臺灣50 指數企業為例,東吳經濟商學學報,89,35-60。
申永順,2008,因應全球暖化國際調適案例之探討,引用自http://www.ctci.org.tw/public/Attachment/911914858307.pdf
張育琳,2016,碳排放量、綠化投資策略與公司績效,管理系統,23-2,197-222。
祝道松、盧正宗、洪晨桓與楊秀萍,2008,環境績效對環境揭露與經濟績效的影響,當代會計,9-2,237-270。
黃正忠,2013,【聯合國最新氣候變遷評估報告】發表後,企業該做什麼?,安侯建業通訊電子報,84,16。
黃正忠,2013,加速氣候治理及碳管理揭露的腳步,安侯建業通訊電子報,80,17-18。
翁霓與蕭運炎,2008,財務報表環境資訊揭露品質影響因素之探討-以國內上市公司為例,東吳經濟商學報,61,1-30。

英文文獻
Aerts, W., and D. Cormier. 2009. Media legitimacy and corporate environmental communication. Accounting, Organizations and Society 34 (1): 1-27.
Andrew, J., and C. Cortese. 2010. Greenhouse gas reporting and the Carbon Disclosure Project, Paper Presented at the Sixth Asia Pacific Interdisciplinary Research in Accounting (APIRA) Conference, Sydney, Australia, available from: http://apira2010.econ.usyd.edu.au/conference_proceedings/APIRA-2010-080-Andrew-Greenhouse-gas-reporting-and-the-carbon-disclosure-project.pdf
Bewley, K., and Y. Li. 2000. Disclosure of Environmental Information by Canadian Manufacturing Companies: A Voluntary Disclosure Perspective. Advances in Environmental Accounting and Management 1: 201-226.
CDP. 2010. Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Global 500 Report. Available from:https://www.cdproject.net/CDPResults/CDP-2010-G500.pdf
Chapple, L., P. M. Clarkson, and D. L. Gold. 2013. The cost of carbon: capital market effects of the proposed emission trading scheme. A Journal of Accounting, Finance, and Business Studies 49 (1): 1-33.
Clarkson, P. M., Y. Li, G. D. Richardson, and F. P. Vasvari. 2008. Revisiting the Relation between Environmental Performance and Environmental Disclosure: An Empirical Analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society 33 (4-5): 303-327.
Cohen, M., S. Fenn, and J. Naimon. 1995. Environmental and Financial Performance: Are They Related? Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
Cormier, D., and M. Magnan. 2003. Environmental Reporting Management: A Continental European Perspective. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 22 (1): 43-62.
Cormier, D., I. M. Gordon, and M. Magnan. 2004. Corporate environmental disclosure: contrasting management’s perceptions with reality. Journal of Business Ethics 49 (2): 143-165.
Dowell, G., S. Hart, and B. Yeung. 2000. Do corporate global environmental standards create or destroy market value? Management Science 46 (8): 1059-1074.
Dye, R. A. 1985. Disclosure of Nonproprietary Information. Journal of Accounting Research 23 (1): 123-145. 
Eccles, R. G., M. P. Krzus, and G. Serafeim. 2011. Market interest in nonfinancial information. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 23 (4): 113-127.
Escobar, L. F., and H. Vredenburg. 2011. Multinational oil companies and the adoption of sustainable development: a resource-based and institutional theory interpretation of adoption heterogeneity. Journal of Business Ethics 98 (1): 39-65.
Fornaro, J. M., K. A. Winkelman, and D. Glodstein. 2009. Accounting for emissions: Emerging issues and the need for global accounting standards. Journal of Accountancy 208 (1): 40-45.
Frias-Aceituno, J. V., L. Rodríguez-Ariza, and I. M. Garcia-Sánchez. 2012. Explanatory Factors of Integrated Sustainability and Financial Reporting. Business Strategy and the Environmen 23 (1): 56-72.
Frost, G., S. Jones, J. Loftus, and S. V. D. Laan. 2005. A survey of sustainability reporting practices of Australian reporting entities. Australian Accounting Review 15 (35): 89-96.
Gray, R., R. Kouhy, and S. Lavers. 1995. Corporate social and environmental reporting: a review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 8 (2): 47-77.
Griffin, P. A., and E. Sun. 2012. Going green: Market reaction to CSR newswire releases. University of California, Davis, Boston University. Working paper. Available from: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1995132
Hart, S. L. 1995. A natural-resource-based view of the firm. The Academy of Management Review 20 (4): 986-1014.
Healy, P. M., and K. G. Palepu. 2001. Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics 31 (1-3): 405-440.
Hoffman, A. J. 2005. Climate Change Strategy: The Business Logic Behind Voluntary Greenhouse Gas Reductions. California Management Review 47 (3): 21-46.
Hoffmann, V. H., and T. Busch. 2008. Corporate carbon performance indicators. J. Ind. Ecol. 12 (4): 505–520.
Holland, L., and Y. E. Foo. 2003. Differences in environmental reporting practices in the UK and the US: the legal and regulatory context. The British Accounting Review 35 (1): 1-18.
Hsu, A., and T. Wang. 2013. Does the market value corporate response to climate change? Omega 41 (2): 195-206.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change(IPCC). 2007. Fourth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2007. Available from:http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/syr/ar4_syr_full_report.pdf
International Energy Agency. 2015. 2015 CO2 emissions from fuel combustion. Available from: https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/CO2EmissionsFromFuelCombustionHighlights2015.pdf
Jingshan, C., and Q. Ying. 2007. Empirical research on drive mechanism of firms' environmental management. Ecological Economy 3 (1).
Kim, E., and T. Lyon. 2011. When does institutional investor activism increase shareholder value? The Carbon Disclosure Project. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy 11 (1): 1682-1935.
King, A., and M. Lenox. 2002. Exploring the Locus of Profitable Pollution Reduction. Management Science 48 (2): 289-299.
Kolk, A., and J. Pinkse. 2005. Business Responses to Climate Change: Identifying Emergent Strategies. California Management Review 47 (3): 6-20.
Kolk, A., D. Levy, and J. Pinkse. 2008. Corporate responses in an emerging climate regime: the institutionalization and commensuration of carbon disclosure. European Accounting Review 17 (4): 719-745.
Konar, S., and M. A. Cohen. 2001. Does the market value environmental performance? The Review of Economics and Statistics 83 (2): 281-289.
KPMG. 2005. International International Survey of Corporate Sustainability. 
Kuo, L., H. C. Yu, and B. G. Chang. 2015. The signals of green governance on mitigation of climate change - evidence from Chinese firms. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management 7 (2): 154-171.
Lash. J., and F. Wellington. 2007. Competitive advantage on a warming planet. Harvard Business Review 85 (3): 94-102. 
Lee, S.-Y., Y.-S Park, and R. D. Klassen. 2015. Market responses to firms’ voluntary climate change information disclosure and carbon communication. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 22 (1): 1–12.
Liao, L., L. Luo, and Q. Tang. 2015. Gender diversity, board independence, environmental committee and greenhouse gas disclosure. The British Accounting Review 47 (4): 409-424.
Liu, Y. S., X. Zhou, J. H. Yang, and A. Hoepner. 2016. Corporate carbon emission and financial performance: Does carbon disclosure mediate the relationship in the UK. Discussion Paper. ICMA Center, Henley Business School. Available from: https://www.henley.ac.uk/files/pdf/research/papers-publications/ICM-2016-03_Liu_et_al.pdf
Lo, S. F., and H. J. Sheu. 2007. Is Corporate Sustainability a Value-Increasing Strategy for Business? Corporate Governance: An International Review 15 (2): 345-358.
Matsumura, E. M., R. Prakash, and S. C. Vera-Muñoz. 2011. Voluntary Disclosures and the Firm-Value Effects of Carbon Emissions. Working Paper. University of Wisconsin-Madison, Georgetown University, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN.
Matsumura, E. M., R. Prakash, and S. C. Vera-Muñoz. 2014. Firm-Value Effects of Carbon Emissions and Carbon Disclosures. The Accounting Review 89 (2): 695-724.
Nakao, Y., A. Amano, K. Matsumara, K. Genba, and M. Nakano. 2007. Relationship between environmental performance and financial performance: an empirical analysis of Japanese corporations. Business Strategy Environment 16 (2): 116-118.
Neu, D., H. Warsame, and K. Pedwell. 1998. Managing public impressions: environmental disclosures in annual reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society 23 (3): 265-282.
Newell, R. G. 2010. The role of markets and policies in delivering innovation for climate change mitigation. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 26 (2): 253-269.
Noronha, C., S. Tou, M. I. Cynthia, and J. J. Guan. 2012. Corporate social responsibility reporting in China: An overview and comparison with major trends. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 20 (1): 29-42.
OECD. 2010. Transition to a low-carbon economy: public goals and corporate practices, OECD Publishing. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264090231-en(accessed 20.08.2011).
Patten, D. M. 2002. The relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: a research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society 27 (8): 763-773.
Pinkse, J., and A. Kolk. 2010. Challenges and trade‐offs in corporate innovation for climate change. Business Strategy and the Environment 19 (4): 261-272.
Porter, M. E. 1991. Towards a dynamic theory of strategy. Strategic Management 12 (S2): 95-117.
Prajogo, D., P. Castka, D. Yiu, C. L. Yeung, and K. H. Lai. 2016. Environmental Audits and Third Party Certification of Management Practices: Firms’ Motives, Audit Orientations, and Satisfaction with Certification. International Journal of Auditing 20 (2): 202-210.
Price water house Coopers (PWC). 2012. Do Investors Care About Sustainability? Seven Trends Provide Clues. (March). New York, NY: PwC.
Robyn, M., C. Windsor, and Y. T. Aw. 2011. Evidence of assurance enhancing the quality of voluntary environmental disclosures: an empirical analysis. Accounting and Finance 52 (3): 903-939.
Roche. 2007. Our SHE performance—greenhouse gas emissions. Available from: http://www.roche.com/dam/jcr:dc27004f-72b3-41b6-8de3-1145626aac38/en/she_greenhouse_gas_emissions.pdf
Ross, C., E. Mills, and S. B. Hecht. 2007. Limiting liability in the greenhouse: insurance risk-management strategies in the context of global climate change. Stanford journal of international law 26A/43A (1): 251-334.
Russo, M. V., and P. A. Fouts. 1997. A Resource-Based Perspective On Corporate Environmental Performance And Profitability. The Academy of Management Journal 40 (3): 534-559.
Scholtens, B., and L. Dam. 2007. Cultural values and international differences in business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 75 (3): 273-284.
Simnett, R., A. Vanstraelen, and W. F. Chua. 2009. Assurance on sustainability reports: an international comparison. The Accounting Review 84 (3): 937-967.
Stern, N. 2007. The Economics of Climate Change (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge).
Stern, N. 2008. The economics of climate change: Richard T. Ely Lecture. American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings 98 (2): 1-37.
Sustain, G. S. 2009. Change is coming: A framework for climate change: A defining issue of the 21st century. Available from: http://www.goldmansachs.com/our-thinking/topics/environment-and-energy/change-is-coming-a-framework-for-climate-change.pdf [June 27, 2012].
Sutantoputra, A. W., M. Lindorff, and E. P. Johnson. 2012. The relationship between environmental performance and environmental disclosure. Austral. J. Environ. Manage. 19 (1): 51-65.
Tang, Q., and L. Luo. 2011. Transparency of Corporate Carbon Disclosure: International Evidence. Working Paper Series. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1885230 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1885230
Thaler, R. H., and C. R. Sunstein. 2009. Saving the planet. In Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health. Wealth and Happiness 185-198. 
Toyota. 2006. Sustainability report 2006. Tokyo: Toyota.
U.S. EPA/OAP (United States Environmental Protection Agency, Ofce of Atmospheric Programs). 2013. Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990–2011. EPA 430-R- 13-001. Washington, DC. April. Available from: http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/219038.pdf
United Nations. 2015. 17 United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Available from:http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/
Waddock, S. A., and S. B. Graves. 1997. The corporate social performance. Strategic Management Journal 18 (4): 303-319.
Wiseman, J. 1982. An Evaluation of Environmental Disclosures made in Corporate Annual Reports. Journal of Accounting, Organizations and Society 7 (1): 53-63.
論文全文使用權限
校內
校內紙本論文延後至2022-06-03公開
電子論文全文不同意授權
校內書目立即公開
校外
不同意授權
校外書目立即公開

如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信