系統識別號 | U0002-1208201910582200 |
---|---|
DOI | 10.6846/TKU.2019.00288 |
論文名稱(中文) | 環保法規對產業出口競爭力的影響 |
論文名稱(英文) | The Impact of Environmental Regulations on Industrial Exports |
第三語言論文名稱 | |
校院名稱 | 淡江大學 |
系所名稱(中文) | 產業經濟學系碩士班 |
系所名稱(英文) | Department of Industrial Economics |
外國學位學校名稱 | |
外國學位學院名稱 | |
外國學位研究所名稱 | |
學年度 | 107 |
學期 | 2 |
出版年 | 108 |
研究生(中文) | 張筑翔 |
研究生(英文) | Chu-Hsiang Chang |
學號 | 607540019 |
學位類別 | 碩士 |
語言別 | 繁體中文 |
第二語言別 | |
口試日期 | 2019-06-21 |
論文頁數 | 46頁 |
口試委員 |
指導教授
-
林佩蒨(pclin@mail.tku.edu.tw)
委員 - 劉德芝(steveliu@mail.ntpu.edu.tw) 委員 - 洪鳴丰(eureka@mail.tku.edu.tw) |
關鍵字(中) |
環保法規 產業出口競爭力 避風港效應 波特假說 |
關鍵字(英) |
Environmental Regulations Industrial Exports Pollution Haven Hypothesis Porter Hypothesis |
第三語言關鍵字 | |
學科別分類 | |
中文摘要 |
本篇論文主要探討環保法規對於產業出口競爭力的影響,並以實證結果提出政策建議供施政者參考。本文的研究方法是奠基於Rajan and Zingales (1998) 的模型並額外加上一衡量國家別環保法規鬆緊程度與產業別汙染密集度的交乘項,再利用共84國2000年至2004年的相關數據進行實證研究,以判斷環保法規對於產業出口競爭力的影響方向與程度以及其所代表的經濟意涵。本文的研究結果可證實,當一國的整體環保法規趨於嚴格時,會顯著降低該國高汙染性產業的出口競爭力,且嚴格環保法規的國家(第75分位)與寬鬆環保法規的國家(第25分位)之間的貿易差異效果為34%至52%左右。即使在考量不同面向的環保法規以及國家發展程度等因素的情況下,本研究之實證結果仍舊可以支持避風港效應之假說,亦即實施環保法規會造成汙染密度高的產業之出口競爭力降低。 |
英文摘要 |
The purpose of this paper is to investigate the impact of environmental stringency on industrial exports and to provide statistical evidence for policy makers. Based on the model proposed by Rajan and Zingales (1998), we construct an interaction term of environmental stringency (at country level) and pollution intensity (at industrial level). By applying the data of 84 countries over the 2000-2004 period to this empirical model, we can examine whether the negative correlation of environmental stringency and export activity exists. According to our OLS estimation results, the environmental stringency does have a negative effect on industrial exports, and this finding supports the pollution haven hypothesis. In addition, this negative relationship between environmental stringency and export activity still sturdily holds no matter in developed or developing countries. Furthermore, the statistical results of this paper also show that for the pollution intensive industries there exists a difference in the loss in terms of the export share lying in a range from 34% to 52% between two countries with a degree of environmental regulation stringency at the 75th percentile and the 25th percentile. |
第三語言摘要 | |
論文目次 |
目錄 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機與目的 1 第二節 研究架構 2 第二章 文獻回顧 4 第一節 避風港效應 4 第二節 波特假說 6 第三章 研究方法與實證資料 9 第一節 模型架構 9 第二節 樣本範圍 10 第三節 變數定義 11 第四章 實證結果與分析 25 第一節 主要結果 25 第二節 產業汙染特性與法規面向 31 第三節 國家差異性問題 39 第五章 結論與建議 42 參考文獻 44 圖表目錄 圖1-1研究流程圖 3 圖3-1各國環境績效指數 15 表3-1產業汙染排行表 16 表3-2產業技術特性表 17 表3-3環境績效指數組成表 18 表3-4各國環境績效指數表 19 表3-5各變數定義表 23 表4-1主要結果 29 表4-2工具變數主要結果 30 表4-3空氣汙染對人類的影響 35 表4-4空氣汙染對生態系的影響 36 表4-5水對人類的影響 37 表4-6水對生態系的影響 38 表4-7國家發展程度 41 |
參考文獻 |
參考文獻 Barro, R. J. and Lee, J. W. (2013), “A New Data Set of Educational Attainment in the World, 1950-2010”, Journal of Development Economics 104(C), 184-198. Berlemann, M. and Wesselhöft, J. E. (2014), “Estimating Aggregate Capital Stocks Using the Perpetual Inventory Method: A Survey of Previous Implementations and New Empirical Evidence for 103 Countries”, Review of Economics 65(1), 1-34. Braun, M. (2003), “Financial Contractibility and Asset Hardness”, mimeo, Harvard University. Cole, M. A. and Fredriksson, P. G. (2009), “Institutionalized Pollution Havens”, Ecological Economics 68(4), 1239-1256. Costantini, V. and Crespi, F. (2008), “Environmental Regulation and the Export Dynamics of Energy Technologies”, Ecological Economics 66(2-3), 447-460. Costantini, V. and Mazzanti, M. (2012), “On the Green and Innovative Side of Trade Competitiveness? The Impact of Environmental Policies and Innovation on EU Exports”, Research Policy 41(1), 132-153. Dean, J. M. (1992), “Trade and the Environment: A Survey of the Literature”, in P. Low, ed., International Trade and the Environment, World Bank Discussion Papers, no. 159. Dufour, C., Lanoie, P. and Patry, M. (1998), “Regulation and Productivity”, Journal of Productivity Analysis 9(3), 233-247. Ederington, J. and Minier, J. (2003), “Is Environmental Policy a Secondary Trade Barrier? An Empirical Analysis”, Canadian Journal of Economics 36(1), 137-154. Feix, R.D., Miranda, S.H.G. and Barros, G.S.A.C. (2008), “Environmental Regulation and International Trade Patterns for Agro-Industrial under a South-North Perspective”, Presented at the 12th Congress of the European Association of Agricultural, August 2008, Ghent, Belgium. Grossman, G. M. and Krueger, A. B. (1993), “Environment Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement”, in Garber, Peter M., ed., The Mexico-U.S. Free Trade Agreement, Cambridge and London: MIT Press, 13-56 Jaffe, A. B. and Palmer, K. (1997), “Environmental Regulation and Innovation: A Panel Data Study”, Review of Economics and Statistics 79(4), 610-619. Jorgenson, D. W. and Wilcoxen, P. J. (1990), “Environmental Regulation and U.S. Economic Growth”, The RAND Journal of Economics 21(2), 314-340. Lanoie, P., Patry, M. and Lajeunesse R. (2008), “Environmental Regulation and Productivity: Testing the Porter Hypothesis”, Journal of Productivity Analysis 30(2), 121-128. Levinson, A. and Taylor, M. S. (2008), “Unmasking the Pollution Haven Effect”, International Economic Review 49(1), 223-254. Mani, M. and Wheeler, D. (1998), “In Search of Pollution Havens? Dirty Industry in the World Economy, 1960 to 1995”, Journal of Environment & Development 7(3), 215- 247. Nicita, A. and Olarreaga, M. (2007), “Trade, Production, and Protection Database, 1976-2004”, World Bank Economic Review 21(1), 165-171. Porter, M. E. and van der Linde, C. (1995), “Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship”, Journal of Economic Perspectives 9(4), 97-118. Rajan, R. G. and Zingales, L. (1998), “Financial Dependence and Growth”, American Economic Review 88(3), 559-586. Samimi, A. J., Erami, N. E. and Mehnatfar, Y. (2010), “Environmental Performance Index and Economic Growth: Evidence from Some Developing Countries”, Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 4(8), 3098-3102. Tobey, J. A. (1990), “The Effects of Domestic Environmental Policies on Patterns of World Trade: An Empirical Test”, Kyklos 43(2), 191-209. |
論文全文使用權限 |
如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信