淡江大學覺生紀念圖書館 (TKU Library)
進階搜尋


下載電子全文限經由淡江IP使用) 
系統識別號 U0002-1207200517135800
中文論文名稱 寡佔市場第三級差別取價與統一遞送訂價之效果
英文論文名稱 Third-degree Price Discrimination and Uniform Delivered Pricing in Duopoly
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中) 產業經濟學系碩士班
系所名稱(英) Department of Industrial Economics
學年度 93
學期 2
出版年 94
研究生中文姓名 鍾文弘
研究生英文姓名 Wen-Hong Zhong
學號 692510240
學位類別 碩士
語文別 中文
口試日期 2005-06-17
論文頁數 46頁
口試委員 指導教授-梁文榮
委員-黃鴻
委員-麥朝成
中文關鍵字 市場規模效果  競爭效果  水平差異化產品 
英文關鍵字 Market-size effect  Competition effect  Horizontal Product Differentiation 
學科別分類 學科別社會科學經濟學
中文摘要 在反托拉斯法(anti-trust laws)或公平交易法(fair trade laws)中,均明文禁止廠商採取價格歧視政策。為研究這項禁令是否恰當,本篇論文建立一個水平差異模型,存在二個不同性質的隔絕市場,一個市場的消費者視所有商品為同質產品,另一個市場的消費者視所有商品為異質產品。在非空間與空間模型的設定下,分別探討在雙佔Bertrand價格競爭下,統一訂價的均衡價格大於差別訂價的兩個均衡價格的條件。我們發現在非空間與空間模型下,均存在某些特定條件使統一訂價的均衡價格大於差別訂價的兩個均衡價格。因此,在這些特定條件下,禁止廠商採取價格歧視政策反而會使得消費者面對較高的價格,這對消費者是不利的。
英文摘要 It is prohibitive for firms to take price discrimination under anti-trust laws or fair trade laws. In order to study the suitability of this prohibition, this thesis constructs a horizontal product differentiation model in which there are two distinct markets: consumers in one market care the difference of products, while consumers in the other do not. We use this model to examine under which conditions that the uniform delivered prices would be higher than the discriminatory prices with spatial and non-spatial models considered, respectively. We show that under certain conditions, the uniform delivered prices could be higher than the discriminatory prices in spatial and non-spatial models. Thus, the probation under anti-trust and fair trade laws would lead to higher prices faced by consumers in these circumstances, which is detrimental to consumers.
論文目次 第一章 簡介………………..……………………….....……….1
第二章 文獻回顧…………………………………...…….…...4
第三章 非空間模型下的均衡價格分析……………...……....8
3.1 廠商採取差別訂價…………….………………………....…10
3.2 廠商採取統一訂價……….…………....................................12
3.3 兩種訂價政策下均衡價格的比較……………………….....14
第四章 空間模型下的均衡價格分析……………...…….….20
4.1 廠商採取差別訂價…………………………………….……21
4.1.1 第二階段 廠商選擇價格………………......................……....…21
4.1.2 第一階段 廠商選擇區位…………………………………..…....23
4.2 廠商採取統一遞送價格………….………………..…..…....27
4.2.1 第二階段 廠商選擇價格………………………….....………….27
4.2.2 第一階段 廠商選擇區位………………………………..…....…28
4.3 兩種訂價政策下均衡價格的比較….................................…32
第五章 結論………………………...………………….…….38
參考文獻…………………………………………………………...…...40
附錄……………………………………………………………..………43
參考文獻 林燕淑,黃鴻,麥朝成, "套利內生化下各種空間訂價之最適廠址與社會福利," 經濟論文30: 2, 2002, p. 153-181.
Anderson, Simon. P., De Palma Andre, and Jacques-Francois. Thisse, “Social Surplus and Profitability under Different Spatial Pricing Policies”, Southern Economic Journal, 1992, 934-49.
Borenstein, S., 1985, “Price Discrimination in Free-Entry Markets,” RAND Journal of Economics, pp. 380-397.
Corts, K.S., 1998, ”Third-degree Price Discrimination in Oligopoly: all-out Competition and Strategic Commitment,” RAND Journal of Economics, Vol.29, No.2, pp. 306-323.
Dixit, A.K., 1979, “A Model of Duopoly Suggesting a theory of Entry Barriers,” Bell Journal of Economics, Vol.10, pp 20-32.
Edwards, E.O., 1950, “The Analysis of Output Under Discrimination,” Econometrica, pp. 163-172.
Hobb, Benjamin F., “Mill-Pricing versus Spatial Price Discrimination under Bertrand and Cournot Spatial Competition”, Journal of Industrial Economics, 1986,173-91.
Holahan, W.L., 1975, “The Welfare Effects of Spatial Price Discrimination,” American Economic Review, pp. 498-503.
Holmes T.J., 1989, “The Effects of Third-Degree Price discrimination in Oligopoly,” American Economic Review, Vol.79, pp. 244-250.
Hwang, H. and Mai, C.C. 1990, “Effect of Spatial Price Discrimination on Output, Welfare, and Location,” American Economic Review, Vol.80, No.3, pp. 567-575.
Kat’z, M.L., “Price Discrimination and Monopolistic Competition,” Econometrica, Vol.52 (1984), pp. 1453-1471.
Ledereer, P.J. and Hurter, A.P., 1986, “Competition of Firms: Discriminatory Pricing and Location,” Econometrica, Vol.54, pp. 623-640.
Liang, W.J., Hwang, H. and Mai, C.C., 2004, “Spatial Discrimination: Bertrand vs. Cournot with Asymmetric Demand,” Working Paper, Tamkang University.
Motta, M., 1993, “Endogenous Quality Choice: Price vs. Quantity Competition,” Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol.41, No.2, pp. 113-131.
Pigou, A., 1920, “The Economics of Welfare,” London: Macmillan.
Robinson, J., 1933, The Economics of Imperfect Competition, London: Macmillan.
Silbergerg, E., 1970, “Output Under Discriminatory Monopoly,” Southern Economic Journal, pp. 84-87.
Singh, N. and Vives, X., 1984, ”Price and Quantity Competition in a Differentiated Duopoly”, RAND Journal of Economics, Vol.15, No.4, pp. 546-554.
Stole’s, L., “Nonlinear Pricing and Oligopoly,” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, Vol.4 (1995), pp. 529-562.
Varian, H.R., 1985, “Price Discrimination and Social Welfare,” American Economic Review, pp. 870-875.
論文使用權限
  • 同意紙本無償授權給館內讀者為學術之目的重製使用,於2005-07-13公開。
  • 同意授權瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2005-07-13起公開。


  • 若您有任何疑問,請與我們聯絡!
    圖書館: 請來電 (02)2621-5656 轉 2281 或 來信