淡江大學覺生紀念圖書館 (TKU Library)
進階搜尋


下載電子全文限經由淡江IP使用) 
系統識別號 U0002-1206202000204100
中文論文名稱 運用多感官教學法於國中七年級英語補救教學之行動研究
英文論文名稱 An Action Research of Multisensory Teaching on Seventh Graders’ English Remedial Instruction
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中) 教育科技學系數位學習碩士在職專班
系所名稱(英) E-Learning Executive Master’s Program in Educational Technology
學年度 108
學期 2
出版年 109
研究生中文姓名 劉芳妏
研究生英文姓名 Fang-Wen Liu
學號 707740188
學位類別 碩士
語文別 中文
口試日期 2020-06-08
論文頁數 191頁
口試委員 指導教授-何俐安
委員-蔡森暉
委員-趙貞怡
中文關鍵字 多感官教學法  低成就學習者  英語補救教學  英語字彙學習 
英文關鍵字 multi-sensory teaching method  low-achieving learners  English remedial instruction  English vocabulary learning 
學科別分類
中文摘要 國中英語補救教學的現況為現職英語教師不堪英語補救教學的繁重工作量,加上外聘教師經驗不足,導致英語補救教學成效有限。因此,本研究旨在探討運用多感官教學法於國中七年級英語補救教學對學生之影響。期許低成就學習者能透過視覺、聽覺、觸覺和動覺等多感官教學活動的參與,學會應用字彙學習策略,進而建立基本的字彙量。
本研究採行動研究法,研究對象為宜蘭縣市某國中七年級英語補救教學之六位學生,進行6週共6節課之英語補救教學課程。課程內容為「國民中學英語科補救教學基本內容」的七年級英語基本字彙,針對英語字彙教學作多感官的教學活動設計。教學流程分為四部份,包含認識字彙、精熟字彙、延伸發展字彙以及應用字彙。研究中所應用的工具為:學生英語學習背景問卷、課堂學習單與課後評量、教師教學日誌、心得學習單、英語字彙能力測驗 (前後測)、及學習滿意度問卷等。主要的研究結論如下:
一、教師運用多感官教學法於字彙教學對低成就學習者的字彙學習有正面的影響。
二、教師運用多感官教學法有助於英語補救教學學生的課堂表現。
三、學生對運用多感官教學法設計的課程持正向的態度。
四、教師透過行動研究的歷程可促進教師之專業知能。
本研究者進一步根據研究結果提出建議,以供未來相關教師與研究者作為參考。
英文摘要 The current status of English remedial instruction in junior high school is that the internal English teachers are unable to bear the heavy workload of English remedial instruction, coupled with the lack of the external teachers’ teaching experience, resulting in the limited effects of English remedial instruction. Therefore, this study aimed was to explore the effects of implementing multisensory teaching on a group of seventh graders of English remedial instruction. It was expected that low-achieving learners could learn to apply vocabulary learning strategies by participating in multi-sensory teaching activities, involving sight, hearing, touch, and kinesthetics, to acquire basic vocabulary.
This study adopted the action research method. The research participants were six seventh-grade students of English remedial instruction in a rural school in Yilan. A total of six English remedial instruction courses was conducted in 6 weeks. The participants were guided to learn the basic vocabulary of seventh grade in "Basic Contents of Remedial Instruction of English Courses in Junior High School". A series of multi-sensory teaching activities were designed for English vocabulary teaching. The teaching process was divided into four parts, including recognizing vocabulary, practicing vocabulary, extending vocabulary, and using vocabulary. The instruments employed in this study were student English learning background questionnaires, worksheets and after-class tests, teachers’ teaching logs, feedback worksheets, English vocabulary ability tests (pretest and posttest), and learning satisfaction questionnaires.
The result of the research showed that (1) implementing multi-sensory teaching on vocabulary teaching brought positive impacts on vocabulary learning for low-achieving learners, (2) implementing multi-sensory teaching contributed to the classroom performance of low-achieving learners, (3) students had a positive attitude towards courses designed according to multi-sensory teaching methods, and (4) the process of implementing the action research could promote teachers' professional knowledge. Based on the findings of the research, further suggestions for future teachers and researchers were provided as a reference.
論文目次 目錄
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的與研究問題 5
第三節 名詞釋義 6
第四節 研究範圍與限制 8
第二章 文獻探討 10
第一節 英語補救教學 10
第二節 英語字彙教學 27
第三節 多感官教學法 35
第三章 研究方法 51
第一節 研究設計與架構 51
第二節 研究對象與環境 55
第三節 教學設計 58
第四節 研究流程 64
第五節 研究工具 68
第六節 資料處理與分析 71
第四章 結果與討論 74
第一節 教學歷程與困難解決 74
第二節 補救教學學生之學習成果 101
第三節 教師之專業成長 118
第五章 結論與建議 123
第一節 結論 123
第二節 建議 127
參考文獻 129
附錄一 教案 145
附錄二 學生英語學習背景問卷 153
附錄三 課堂學習單與課後評量卷 155
附錄四 教師教學日誌 175
附錄五 心得學習單 178
附錄六 英語字彙能力測驗(前後測) 181
附錄七 學習滿意度問卷 185
附錄八 家長同意書 187
附錄九 認識字彙教材 188











表次

表2-1- 1臺灣補救教學相關政策一覽表 11
表2-1- 2調整式教學之調整向度與實例 18
表3-2- 1研究對象英語學習背景簡述表 55
表3-3- 1英語字彙教學目標 58
表3-3- 2本研究之英語補救教學內容 59
表3-5- 1本研究問題與研究工具對照表 70
表3-6- 1資料類別與資料編碼說明 72
表4-1- 1本行動研究的教學省思與修正 99
表 4-2- 1英語字彙能力測驗前後測成對樣本t檢定摘要 108
表 4-2- 2整體學習滿意度量化結果 112
表4-2- 3學習滿意度問卷細項得分表 113













圖次

圖2-3- 1教學經驗的連續性 36
圖2-3- 2語意圖 47
圖2-3- 3 語意特徵分析 48
圖3-1- 1研究概念架構圖 54
圖3-4- 1研究流程圖 67
圖4-1- 1 單元二回家作業 96
圖4-2- 1 單元二數字心智圖 104
圖4-2- 2教學現場之學生實際運用字彙 105
圖4-2- 3 單元二學習單之家族表繪製 107
圖4-2- 4 英語字彙能力測驗前後測平均數 108
圖4-2- 5教學現場之學生積極參與課堂活動 109

參考文獻 參考文獻

壹、中文部分
丁凡 (譯) (2001)。多感官學習 (原作者:Carolyn Olivier & Rosemary F. Bowler)。臺北市:遠流出版社。(原著出版年:1996)
王憶菁(2005)。多感官教學活動。取自http://blog.xuite.net/topnet32/stwotp
王麗卿(2002)。提昇學習困難的學生之學習能力個案問題的探討及個別化教學之規劃。臺中師院特教論文集,26-48。臺中:國立臺中師範學院特殊教育中心。
王藝霖 (2016)。通用學習設計融入英語自然發音補救教學之行動研究 (未出版之碩士論文)。淡江大學,臺北市。
江淑怡 (2009)。直接教學法對提升國小四年級數學低成就學生乘法演算能力之行動研究 (未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
李怡嫻 (2013)。提升英語字彙認讀能力之補助教學行動研究-以新埔國中為例。新竹縣教育研究發展暨網路中心,新竹縣。
朱慧君 (2001)。國小閱讀補救教學方法之分析研究 (未出版之碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學,嘉義縣。
李漢文 (2002)。臺東年縣九一貫課程英語科教學實施現況與意見調查之研究 (未出版之碩士論文)。臺東師範學院,臺東。
何珮菁 (2007)。直接教學模式應用在國中資源班學生數學學習成效之研究 (未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北。
杜正治 (1993)。補救教學的實施。刊於李永吟 (1993)。學習輔導:學習心理學的應用。臺北市:心理。

余民寧、李昭鋆 (2018)。補救教學中個別化教學對學生學習成效之影響分析。教育科學研究期刊,63(1),247-271。
邱上真 (2001)。特殊教育導論:帶好班上每位學生。臺北市:心理。
林于雯(2003)。屏東縣國民小學英語教學實施現況及其遭遇問題之研究 (未出版之碩士論文)。屏東師範學院,屏東。
林良齊 (2018年6月11日)。學校教育亮警訊 英聽雙峰化國小就開始。倡議。取自https://ubrand.udn.com/ubrand/index
林侃逸(2009)。基於建構主義與社群的英語字彙學習流程於平臺 (未出版之碩士論文)。國立中央大學資訊管理研究所,臺北。
林政逸(2016)。影響國中小學補救教學實施方案成效因素之探究。臺灣教育評論月刊,5(11),32-37。
林素貞、朱思穎、陳佩玉、王秋鈴、黃湘玲、蔡曉楓、葉靖雲、詹孟琦(譯) (2013)。特殊需求學生的教材教法(原作者:E. A. Polloway, J. R. Patton, L. Serna, & J. W. Bailey)。臺北市:華騰文化。
林素卿 (2002)。教師行動研究導論。高雄:復文。
吳明柱、柯彥廷 (2016)。宜蘭縣國中英語、數學適性與補救教學實驗計畫實施報導。中等教育,67(3),75-84。
吳清山、林天祐 (2005)。教育新辭書。臺北市:高等。
周欣 (譯) (1996)。蒙特梭利教學法 (原作者:M. Montessori)。臺北市:桂冠。(原出版年:1912)
周慧心 (2014年3月12日)。研究:多感官教學增強記憶 學習效率事半功倍。大紀元。取自https://www.epochtimes.com/b5/
馬芳婷(1989)。社教機構短期研習班教師教學行為與學生學習滿意度之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學社會教育研究所,臺北。

洪儷瑜 (2005)。學習輔導。載於鄔佩麗(編著),輔導與諮商心理學 (頁377-409)。臺北市:東華。
洪儷瑜 (2012)。由補救教學到三層級學習支援。教育研究月刊,221,13-24。
孫敏芝(2008)。增進低成就學生學習成效的教學設計。教育研究月刊,172,86-94。
郭生玉 (1995)。臺北市國民中小學實施補救教學相關問題之研究。臺北市政建設專題研究報告,第255號。
郭玉霞 (2000)。教育大辭書。取自http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1313894/
陳伯璋(1990)。教育研究方法的新取向-質的研究方法。臺北市: 南宏圖書公司。
陳宜莉(2016)。補救教學政策內涵之論述與實踐。發表於2016提升中小學補救教學成效之理論與實務研討論壇。臺北市,臺灣。
陳柏旬、王雅珊 (2010)。多感官教學在智能障礙學生的應用。雲嘉特教,12, 25-32。
陳恒毅、薛雅芳 (2015)。以補救教學觀點探討提升國中學生英語能力之因應管理之道評估之研究。危機管理學刊,12(1),45-54。
陳淑麗、宣崇慧(2014)。帶好每一位學生:有效的補救教學。臺北市:心理出版社。
陳惠邦(1998)。教育行動研究。臺北:師大書苑。
陳漪真、佘永吉 (2018)。直接教學法結合繪本教材對提升國中學習障礙學生英語字彙學習之成效。身心障礙研究,16(3-4),201-219。
陳曉萱、陳璧清 (2011)。運用平衡閱讀教學活動於英文電子繪本閱讀對英語學習者的字彙能力及閱讀理解影響之研究。長榮大學學報,15(2),49-75。
張文哲(譯) (2005)。教育心理學:理論與實務 (原作者:R. E. Slavin)。臺北市:學富文化。(原出版年:2003)
張明彥(2018)。幼兒園進行引導式科學探究教學之行動研究-以幼兒浮沉概念為例 (未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東大學,屏東。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/3ya829
張春興 (1996)。教育心理學。臺北市:東華。
張新仁 (1995)。教學原理與策略。載於王家通主編之教育導論。臺北市:五南。
張新仁、邱上真、李素慧 (1999)。國中學習困難學生之補救教學方案研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告 (NSC 88-2614-H-017-011)。
張新仁(2001)。實施補救教學之課程與教學設計。教育學刊,17,85-106。
張嘉寧 (2007)。國民中學實施「攜手計畫-課後扶助」方案成效之研究 (未出版之碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學,嘉義。
張綾峰 (2012)。RT教學運用於國中英語補救教學的行動研究。洪儷瑜 (主持人),補救教學實施之行動研究成果及其他。2012提升補救教學成效之理論與實務研討論壇,國立臺南大學。
張馨文、劉唯玉 (2013) 。強勢智能搭橋英語補救教學方案對國中英語低成就學生學習成效影響之個案實驗研究。慈濟大學教育研究學刊,9,139-163。
教育部 (2004)。國民小學英語教學向下延伸至三年級之課程綱要。取自http://teach.eje.edu.tw/9CC/detail.php?Item=&ID=3084
教育部(2014)。國民小學及國民中學補教學實施方案。中華民國103年1月24日臺教國署國字第1030004427號函。
教育部 (2015)。教育部國民及學前教育署補助直轄市、縣市政府辦理補救教學作業要點。臺北: 教育部。
教育部 (2016)。國民小學及國民中學學生學習扶助資源平臺。基本學習內容。取自 https://priori.moe.gov.tw/index.php?mod=resource/index/content/basic_con
教育部 (2017)。國民小學及國民中學補救教學標準作業流程手冊。國中教育會考。取自 https://priori.moe.gov.tw/index.php?mod=rdm/index/content/sop
教育部 (2019)。國民小學及國民中學補救教學資源平臺。取自https://priori.moe.gov.tw/index.php?mod=about/index/content/plan
許文敏 (2001)。實用技能班學生學習滿意度之研究 (未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北。
許有德 (2010)。國中英語拼字遊戲系統的設計與評估 (未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
曾世杰、陳瑋婷、陳淑麗 (2013)。大學生以瞬識字及字母拼讀直接教學法對國中英語低成就學生的補救教學成效研究。課程與教學季刊,16(1),1-34。
黃宜茹 (2011)。國小學生英語詞彙學習策略與學習風格之研究-以桃園某國小為例 (未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北。
黃聖慧(2007)。給他們魚吃,不如給他們釣竿。英文新天地,15,5-13。
黃聖慧(2007)。把「背單字」變成一件有趣又有成就感的事。英文新天地,16,4-12。
游美如(2009)。社區大學英語教學應用多感官教學策略對學習表現影響之研究(未出版之碩士論文),國立中正大學,嘉義縣。
游俊遠 (2008)。多感官學習應用於互動裝置之研究-以孩童音感遊戲為例 (未出版之碩士論文)。國立雲林科技大學,雲林縣。
楊逸雲 (2013)。運用後設認知學習策略融入遊戲式教學提升國中英語補救教學成效之行動研究 (未出版之碩士論文)。淡江大學,臺北市。
監察院 (2011)。補救教學調查報告。臺北: 監察院。
趙曉美 (2015)。補救教學 vs. 有效教學。臺灣教育評論月刊,4(4),21-25。
蔡清田 (2000a)。行動研究及其在教育研究上的應用。中正大學教育研究所主編:質的研究方法。高雄:麗文。
蔡清田(2000b)。教育行動研究。臺北:五南。
蔡清田 (2011)。行動研究的理論與實踐。T&D飛訊,118,1-20。
蔡清田 (2008)。DeSeCo能力三維論對我國十二年一貫課程改革的啟示。課程與教學季刊,11(3),1-16。
蔡鎮宇 (2012)。國中英語字彙補救教學教材設計與發展方式初探。「2012提升補救教學成效之理論與實務研討論壇」發表之論文,國立臺南大學。
鄭麗玉 (2007)。認知心理學:理論與應用 (第三版)。臺北市:五南。
廖曉清(2010)。英語教學法。臺北市:五南圖書出版社。
謝一謙(2002)。國民小學英語教學實施現況及其遭遇問題之研究-以臺中市為例 (未出版之碩士論文)。臺中師範學院,臺中。
簡梅瑩 (2008)。促進反思教學發展與實施之行動研究。中等教育,59(1),22-35。
魏式琦、陳淑珠、盧慧真、曾豐仁 (2013)。多感官學習之字母拼讀補救教學對低成就學生的成效探討。教師專業研究期刊,6,63-102。
羅引宏 (2008)。學習策略:串連法記憶術。取自http://www.chash.chc.edu.tw/chash2008/chashlib2008/studies01.html
羅寶鳳 (2015)。補救教學問題何在?。師友月刊,580,1-4。







貳、西文部分
Adams, M. J., Treiman, R., & Pressley, M. (1998). Reading, writing and literacy. In I. Sigel & A. Renninger (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 4. Child psychology in practice (5th ed., pp. 275-355). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Adeniyi, F. O. & Lawal, R. A. (2012). Comparative effects of multisensory and metacognitive instructional approaches on English vocabulary achievement of underachieving Nigerian secondary school students. International Education Studies, 5(1), 18-27. ISSN: 1913-9020.
Ali, S. (2012). Teaching reading and spelling to adult learners: The multisensory structural language approach. English Language Teaching, 5(3), 40-45. ISSN: 1916-4742.
Anders, P. L., & Bos, C. S. (1986). Semantic feature analysis; an interactive strategy for vocabulary development and text comprehension. Journal of Reading, 29(7), 610-16. Retrieved from https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.lib.tku.edu.tw/docview/63322978?accountid=14237
Applebee, A. N., Langer, J. A., Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (2003). Discussion-based approaches to developing understanding: Classroom instruction and student performance in middle and high school english. American Educational Research Journal, 40(3), 685-730. doi:http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.lib.tku.edu.tw/10.3102/00028312040003685
Arnheim, R. (1997). Visual thinking. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Baines, L. (2008). A teacher’s guide to multisensory learning: improving literacy by engaging the senses. Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Birsh, J. R. (2005). Multisensory teaching of basic language skills. London: Paul H. Brookes.


Bos, C. S., & Anders, P. L. (1990). Effects of interactive vocabulary instruction on the vocabulary learning and reading comprehension of junior-high learning disabled students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 13(1), 31-42. Retrieved from https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.lib.tku.edu.tw/docview/63066290?accountid=14237
Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education Harvard University Press, 79 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138. Retrieved from https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.lib.tku.edu.tw/docview/62574186?accountid=14237
Calhoun, E. F. (1993). Action research: Three approaches. Retrieved from ERIC Retrieved from https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.lib.tku.edu.tw/docview/62790036?accountid=14237
Cameron, J. (2001). Negative effects of reward on intrinsic motivation - A limited phenomenon: Comment on Deci, Koestner, and Ryan (2001). Review of Educational Research, 71, 29-42.
Campbell, M. L., Helf, S., & Cooke, N. L. (2008). Effects of adding multisensory components to a supplemental reading program on the decoding skills of treatment resisters. Education and Treatment of Children, 31(3), 267-295. Retrieved from https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.lib.tku.edu.tw/docview/61969734?accountid=14237
Carlisle, J. F., & Katz, L. A. (2005). Word learning and vocabulary instruction. In Judith R. Birsh (Eds.), Multisensory Teaching of Basic Language skills (2nd ed., pp. 23-37). London: Paul H. Brookes.
Chin-Wen, C. (2016). Pre-service English teacher’s professional identity construction through lesson design and delivery of English remedial education. 師資培育與教師專業發展期刊, 9(1), 1-26. doi: 10.3966/207136492016040901001
Coady, J., & Huckin, T. (Eds.). (1997). Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy. Cambridge University Press.


Dale, E. (1946). The cone of experience. In Audio-visual methods in teaching. (pp. 37-51). New York: Dryden Press. In D. P. Ely & T. Plomp (Eds.), Classic Writings on Instructional Technology (Vol. 1, pp. 169 -180). Englewood: Libraries Unlimited, Inc.
Dale, E. (1969). Audiovisual methods in teaching. New York: Dryden Press.
DeCarrico, J. S. (2001). Vocabulary learning and teaching. In M. Cele-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3rd ed.) (p. 285-299). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
Dunn, R., Griggs, Olson, Gorman & Beasley (1995). A meta-analytical validation of the Dunn and Dunn learning styles model. Journal of Educational Research, 88 (6), 353-361.
Elliott, J. (1981). Action research: A framework for self-evaluation in schools. Norwich: Centre for Applied Research in Education, University of East Anglia.
Elliott, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Ellis, E., Deshler, D., Lenz, B., Schumaker, J., & Clark, F. (1991). An instructional model for teaching strategies. Focus on Exceptional Children, 23(6), 11.
Ellis, N. C. (1996). Sequencing in SLA: Phonological memory, chunking, and points of order. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 91–126.
Farrell, M. L. & Matthews, F. M. (2010). Ready to read: A multisensory approach to language-based comprehension instruction. London, England: Paul H. Brookes.
Feldman, A. (1994). Erzberger's dilemma: Validity in action research and science teachers' need to know. Retrieved from ERIC Retrieved from https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.lib.tku.edu.tw/docview/62719998?accountid=14237
Gairns, R., & Redman, S. (1986). Working with words: A guide to teaching and learning vocabulary. New York: Cambridge.
Gersten, R., Woodward, J., & Darch, G. (1985). Direct instruction: A research-based approach to curriculum design and teaching. Exceptional Children, 53, 17-31.

Gersten, R., & Baker, S. (2003). English-language learners with learning disabilities. In H. L. Swanson, K.R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (p. 94-109). New York: Guilford Press.
Ghazal, L. (2007). Learning vocabulary in EFL contexts through vocabulary learning
strategies. Novitas-Royal, 1(2), 84-91.
Ghoneim, N. M. Ma. & Elghotmy, H. E. Ab. (2015). The effect of a suggested multisensory phonics program on developing kindergarten pre-service teacher’s EFL reading accuracy and phonemic awareness. English Language Teaching, 8(12), 124-143. ISSN: 1916-4742.
Giess, S., Rivers, K. O., Kennedy, K., & Lombardino, L. J. (2012). Effects of multisensory phonics-based training on the word recognition and spelling skills of adolescents with reading disabilities. International Journal of Special Education, 27(1), 60-73. Retrieved from https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.lib.tku.edu.tw/docview/1140136581?accountid=14237
Grandin, T. (2006a). Thinking in pictures. New York: Vintage.
Haager, D., Gersten, R., Baker, S., & Graves, A. (2003). The English-language
learner classroom observation instrument: observations of beginning reading
instruction in urban schools. In S.R. Vaughn & K.L. Briggs (Eds.), Reading in the classroom: Systems for observing teaching and learning. Baltimore MD: Brookes Publishing.
Hamzah, M. S., Kafipour, R., & Abdullah, S. K. (2009). Vocabulary learning strategies of Iranian undergraduate EFL students and its relation to their vocabulary size. European Journal of Social Sciences, 11(1), 39-50.
Harley, B. (1996). Vocabulary learning and teaching in a second language. The
Canadian Modern Language Review, 53 (1).
Hazoury, K. H., Oweini, A. A., & Bahous, R. (2009). A multisensory approach to teach arabic decoding to students with dyslexia. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 7(1), 1-20. Retrieved from https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.lib.tku.edu.tw/docview/61819854?accountid=14237
Hebert, B. M., & Murdock, J. (1994). Comparing three computer-aided instruction ouput modes to teach vocabulary to students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 9, 136-141.
H’Doubler, M. (2002). Education through dance. in A. Mertz (Ed.), The body can speak (pp. 10-14). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Johnson, G., Gersten, R., & Carnine, D. (1987). Effects of instructional design variables on vocabulary acquisition of LD students: A study of computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 206-213.
Joshi, R. M., Dahlgren, M., & Boulware-Gooden, R. (2002). Teaching reading in an inner city school through a multisensory teaching approach. Annals of Dyslexia, 52, 229-42. Retrieved from https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.lib.tku.edu.tw/docview/62215389?accountid=14237
Juan, L., & Cheng, C. (2008). Using extensive reading to improve the learning performance and attitude of elementary school remedial students. 英語教學期刊, 32(4), 42-82. doi: 10.6330/ETL.2008.32.4.02
Katai, Z., & Toth, L. (2010). Technologically and artistically enhanced multi-sensory computer-programming education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 244-251.
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988 ). The action research planner. Geelong: Deakin University Press.
Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2007). Implementing the four levels : A practical guide for effective evaluation of training programs. Retrieved from https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.lib.tku.edu.tw
Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2, 34-46. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1946.tb02295.x
Lewin, K. (1952). Field theory in social science. New York: Harper &Row.
Lyons, D. (2017, July). How many people speak English, and where is it spoken? Babbel Magazine. Retrieved from https://www.babbel.com/en/magazine/how-many-people-speak-english-and-where-is-it-spoken
McLaughlin, T. F., & Vacha, E. F. (1992). The at-risk student: A proposal for action. Journal of instructional psychology, 19, 66-68.
McNiff, J. (1988). Action research: Principles and practice. Lodon: Macmillan .
McTaggart, R. (1988). Action Research: A prologue to praxis. Geelong: Deakin University Press.
McTaggart, R. (1997). Participatory action research. New York: State University of New York Press.
Medina, M. S. (2008). Assessing student performance during experiential rotations. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy : AJHP : Official Journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, 65(16), 1502-1506. doi:http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.lib.tku.edu.tw/10.2146/ajhp080007
Mercer, C. D., & Mercer, A. R. (1998). Teaching students with learning problems (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
Metcalf, D., Evans, C., Flynn, H. K., & Williams, J. B. (2009). Direct instruction +UDL=Access for diverse learners: How to plan and implement an effective multisensory spelling lesson. TEACHING Exceptional Children Plus, 5(6) Article: 2. Retrieved from http://escholarship.bc.edu/education/tecplus/vo15/iss6/art2
Moats, L. C., & Farrell, M. (2005). Multisensory structured language education. In Judith R. Birsh (Eds.), Multisensory Teaching of Basic Language skills (2nd ed., pp. 23-37). London: Paul H. Brookes.
Montessori, M. (1995). The Montessori method. Wiltshire: Thoemmes Press.
Mousavi, S. Y., Low, R., & Sweller, J. (1995). Reducing cognitive load by mixing auditory and visual presentation modes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 319-334.
Nation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.


National Reading Panel (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
Nation, P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Norton, T., & Land, B. L. (1992). A multisensory approach to teaching spelling in remedial English. Teaching English in the Two-Year College, 19(3), 192-95. Retrieved from https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.lib.tku.edu.tw/docview/62847696?accountid=14237
Oakland, T., Black, J. L., Stanford, G., Nussbaum, N. L., & Balise, R. R. (1998). An evaluation of the dyslexia training program: A multisensory method for promoting reading in students with reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31(2), 140-47. Retrieved from https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.lib.tku.edu.tw/docview/62558665?accountid=14237
Pierce, R. D. (2006). Vocabulary size and general English proficiency- Taiwan Egnlish majors. SPECTRUM: NCUE Studies in Language, Literature, T, (1), 35-53.
Pfeiffer, J. (1999). Long-term retention of novel information learned via the keyword mnemonic method. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education-theory, research, and applications (2nd Ed.). New Jersey: Merrill Prentice Hall.
Quinney, K. A. (2018). The effects of teaching phonemic awareness and phonics skills to preschool-aged children with autism spectrum disorder (Order No. 10937278). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses A&I. (2125081203). Retrieved from https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.lib.tku.edu.tw/docview/2125081203?accountid=14237

Roskos, K., Burstein, K., & Sullivan S. (2013). A small-scale study of the effects of supplemental vocabulary instruction on preschoolers with vocabulary delays. Creative Education, 14(7A1), 15-22.
Reuter, H. B. (2006). Phonological awareness instruction for middle school students with disabilities: A scripted multisensory intervention (Order No. 3251867). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses A&I. (305252965). Retrieved from https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.lib.tku.edu.tw/docview/305252965?accountid=14237
Schlesinger, N. W., & Gray, S. (2017). The impact of multisensory instruction on learning letter names and sounds, word reading, and spelling. Annals of Dyslexia, 67(3), 219-258. doi:http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.lib.tku.edu.tw/10.1007/s11881-017-0140-z
Schmitt, N. (1997). Vocabulary learning strategies. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (p. 199-227). Cambridge: Press.
Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shams, L., & Seitz, A. R. (2008). Benefits of multisensory learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 411-417.
Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2003). Neurobiologic basis for reading disability. In P. McCardle & V. Chhabra (Eds.), The voice of evidence in reading research (pp. 417-442). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
Slavin, R. E. (1989). Student at –risk for school failure. In R. E. Slavin, N. L. Karweit, & N. E. Madden (Eds), Effective programs for students at-risk (3-19). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Somekh, B. (2005). Action research: A methodology for change and development Open University Press, The McGraw-Hill companies, Order Services, P.O. Box 182605, Columbus, OH 43218-2605. Retrieved from https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.lib.tku.edu.tw/docview/62087576?accountid=14237
Sökmen, A. J. (1997). Current trends in teaching second language vocabulary. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (p.237-257). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Spiegel, D. P., T, L., B, T., Petoe, M. A., K, K., Stinear, C. M., & Searchfield, G. D. (2015). Multisensory attention training for treatment of tinnitus. Scientific Reports (Nature Publisher Group), 5, 10802. doi:http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.lib.tku.edu.tw/10.1038/srep10802
Stahl, S. A., & Fairbanks, M. M. (1986). The effects of vocabulary instruction: A model-based meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 56(1), 72-110. Retrieved from https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.lib.tku.edu.tw/docview/85479247?accountid=14237
Staley, L. (1997). What does purple smell like?. Childhood Education, 73, 240-242.
Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew Effects in Reading: Some Consequences of Individual Differences in the Acquisition of Literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360-405.
Strichart, S. S., & Gottlieb, J. (1982). Characteristics of mild mental retardation. In T. L. Miller & E. E. Davis (Eds), The mildly handicapped student (pp.37-65). New York: Grune & Stratton.
Stringer, E.T. (1996). Action research: A handbook for practitioners. CA: Sage.
Su-Yueh, W. (2012). The effect of multiple instruction activities on college EFL students’ English vocabulary retention. 人文與社會研究學報, 46(2), 51-74. doi:10.7029/JHSSS.201210.0051
Taljaard, J. (2016). A review of multi-sensory technologies in a science, technology, engineering, arts and mathematics (STEAM) classroom. Journal of Learning Design, 9(2), 46-55. Retrieved from https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.lib.tku.edu.tw/docview/1969021780?accountid=14237
Torris, R. M. (2000). Literacy for all: A united nations literacy decade. Paris, France: UNESCO. Retrieved from
http://www.fronesis.org/immagen/rmt/documentosrmt/UN_Literacy_Decade.pdf
Vickery, K. S., & Others, A. (1987). Multisensory teaching approach for reading, spelling, and handwriting, Orton-Gillingham based curriculum, in a public school setting. Annals of Dyslexia, 37, 189-200. Retrieved from https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.lib.tku.edu.tw/docview/63165330?accountid=14237
Wagner, R. (1996). From simple structure to complex function: Major trends in the development of theories, models, and measurements of memory. In G. R. Lyon & N. A. Krasnegor (Eds.), Attention, memory, and executive function (pp. 139-156). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
Warnick, K., & Caldarella, P. (2016). Using multisensory phonics to foster reading skills of adolescent delinquents. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 32(4), 317-335. doi:http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.lib.tku.edu.tw/10.1080/10573569.2014.962199
Weiner, B. (1986). An attribution theory of motivation and emotion. New York, NY: Springer.
Williams, A. (2017). The effects of multisensory phonics instruction on the fluency and decoding skills of students with learning disabilities in a middle school resource classroom (Master’s thesis, Theses and Dissertations). Retrieved from
http: //rdw.rowan.edu/etd/2425
Wilkins, D. A. (1972). Linguistics in language teaching. Cambridge: MFT Press.
Wittrock, M. C. (1992). Generative learning processes of the brain. Educational Psychologist, 27, 531-541.
Ying-Chun, L. (2013). Integrating vocabulary learning strategy instruction into EFL classrooms. Taiwan Journal of TESOL, 10(1), 37-76.
Yung-Chi, H. (2014). Formal vocabulary instruction in EFL context. 國立虎尾科技大學學報, 32(2), 37-50.
論文使用權限
  • 同意紙本無償授權給館內讀者為學術之目的重製使用,於2020-07-03公開。
  • 同意授權瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2020-07-03起公開。


  • 若您有任何疑問,請與我們聯絡!
    圖書館: 請來電 (02)2621-5656 轉 2486 或 來信