淡江大學覺生紀念圖書館 (TKU Library)

系統識別號 U0002-1106201414353900
中文論文名稱 雙佔市場結構下的政府協助與違約風險:強銀行與弱銀行
英文論文名稱 Government bailouts and default risks of a duopoly: strong bank vs. weak bank
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中) 國際企業學系碩士班
系所名稱(英) Master's Program, Department Of International Business
學年度 102
學期 2
出版年 103
研究生中文姓名 鄭筑芸
研究生英文姓名 Chu-Yun Cheng
學號 602550203
學位類別 碩士
語文別 英文
口試日期 2014-05-02
論文頁數 43頁
口試委員 指導教授-林志鴻
中文關鍵字 銀行利差  違約風險  政府不良資產購買  政府直接資本注入  雙佔市場結構 
英文關鍵字 Bank Interest Margin  Default RisDistressed Asset Purchases  Direct Equity Injections  Duopoly 
中文摘要   本篇論文試圖從比較強勢銀行與弱勢銀行等雙寡頭假設銀行在面對政府提供弱銀行救助的情況下違約風險的變動之論點,應用Hoshi and Kashyap (2010)針對政府介入銀行市場並且提供救助有利於弱銀行的觀點以及Merton (1973、1974)分別針對弱銀行與強銀行在面對政府救助的情況下的股權變動的觀點,導入具有能夠評估市場價值(market value)之Black and Scholes (1973)選擇評價模式,利於比較靜態分析來解釋強銀行與弱銀行在面對政府藉由採購不良貸款和直接注資等措施救助弱銀行下,銀行利差、銀行體系穩定性的變動,將如何影響強銀行與弱銀行的違約風險的變動。

英文摘要   A duopolistic loan market includes a strong bank without the problem of early closure that opts out of government bailouts and a weak bank with the problem that participates in the bailout programs of distressed loan purchases and direct equity injections. A direct implication of our framework is that the strong bank’s equity will be priced as a standard call option and the weak bank’s equity will be priced as a down-and-out call option. We find that an increase in either the bailout directly decreases the weak bank’s default risk, but indirectly increases the strong bank’s default risk. Accordingly, either the bailout contributes banking stability since the indirect positive effect insufficiently offsets the direct negative effect to give an overall negative response of default risks to an increase in either the bailout. Higher competition by shifting to quasi-competition from collusion increases banking stability under either the bailout.
論文目次 目錄

謝辭 Ⅰ
中文摘要 Ⅱ
英文摘要 Ⅲ
目錄 Ⅳ
圖表目錄 Ⅴ

Chapter 1 Introduction 1
Chapter 2 Related literature 6
Chapter 3 The model 9
Chapter 4 Solutions and comparative static results 17
Chapter 5 Numerical exercises 23
Chapter 6 Conclusions 38
References 39


Table 1: Values , , and at various levels of and 25

Table 2: Impact on and from changes in when 26

Table 3: Impact on and from changes in when 29

Table 4: Impact on and from changes in when 31

Table 5: Impact on and from changes in when 35

Figure 1: Impact on and from changes in when
Total effect = + 32

Figure 2: Impact on and from changes in when
Total effect = + 32

Figure 3: Impact on and from changes in when
Incremental effect = total effect total effect 33

Figure 4: Impact on and from changes in when
Total effect = + 36

Figure 5: Impact on and from changes in when
Total effect = + 36

Figure 6: Impact on and from changes in when
Incremental effect = total effect total effect 37
參考文獻 Allen, F., Gale, D., 2004. Competition and financial stability. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 36, 453-480.
Bayazitova, D., Shivdasani, A., 2011. Assessing TARP. Review of Financial Studies 25, 377-402.
Bebchuk, L.A., 2008. A plan for addressing the financial crisis, Working Paper, Harvard University.
Berger, A.N., Bouwman, C.H.S., Kick, T., Schaeck, K., 2010. Bank liquidity creation and risk taking during distress. Deutsche Bundesbank Discussion Paper Series 2, No. 0512010, Deutsche Bundesbank, Frankfurt am Main.
Black, F., Scholes, M., 1973. The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. Journal of Political Economy 81, 637-659.
Black, L.K., Hazelwood, L.N., 2012. The effect of TARP on bank risk-taking. Journal of Financial Stability 196, 1-14.
Boyd, J.H., De Nicolo, G., 2005. The theory of bank risk taking and competition revisited. Journal of Finance 60, 1329-1343.
Brockman, P., Turtle, H., 2003. A barrier option framework for corporate security valuation. Journal of Financial Economics 67, 511-529.
Bulow, J.I., Geanakoplos, J.D., Klemperer, P.D., 1985. Multimarket oligopoly: strategic substitutes and complements. Journal of Political Economy 93, 488-511.
Calderon, C., Schaeck, K., 2013. Bank bailouts, competition, and the disparate effects for borrower and depositor welfare. Policy Research Working Paper Series 6410, World Bank.
Coccorese, P., 2005. Competition in markets with dominant firms: a note on the evidence from the Italian banking industry. Journal of Banking and Finance 29, 1083-1093.
Dam, L., Koetter, M., 2012. Bank bailouts and moral hazard: evidence from Germany. Review of Financial Studies 25, 2343-2380.
Duchin, R., Sosyura, D., 2012. Safer ratios, riskier portfolios: banks’ response to government aid, Working paper, University of Michigan.
Episcopos, A., 2004. The implied reserves of bank insurance fund. Journal of Banking and Finance 28, 1617-1635.
Episcopos, A., 2008. Bank capital regulation in a barrier option framework. Journal of Banking and Finance 32, 1677-1686.
Gropp, R., Hakenes, H., Schnabel, I., 2011. Competition, risk-shifting, and public bail-out policies. Review of Financial Studies 24, 2084-2120.
Hakenes, H., Schnabel, I., 2011. Capital regulation, bank competition, and financial stability. Economics Letters, forthcoming.
Hawtrey, K., Liang, H., 2008. Bank interest margins in OECD countries. North American Journal of Economics and Finance 19, 249-260.
Ho, T., Saunders, A., 1981. The determinants of bank interest margins: theory and empirical evidence. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analyses 16, 581-600.
Hoshi, T., Kashyap, A.K., 2010. Will the U.S. bank recapitalization succeed? eight lessons from Japan. Journal of Financial Economics 97, 398-417.
Kashyap, A.K., Rajan, R., Stein, J.C., 2002. Banks as liquidity providers: an explanation for the coexistence of lending and deposit-taking. Journal of Finance 57, 33-73.
Keeley, M., 1990. Deposit insurance, risk, and market power in banking. American Economic Review 80, 1183-1200.
Klomp, J., 2013. Government interventions and default risk: does one size fit all? Journal of Financial Stability 9, 641-653.
Lin, J.H., Chang, C.P., Lin, H.N., 2013. A note on bank default risk under government capital injection coinciding with high future loss expectation. Applied Economics Letters 20, 1368-1373.
Lin, J.H., Tsai, J.Y., Cheng, C.Y., 2014. Government bailouts and default risks of a duopoly: strong bank vs. weak bank. Working Paper, Department of International Business, Tamkang University, 02/18.
Martinez-Miera, D., Repullo, R., 2010. Does Competition reduce the risk of bank failure? Review of Financial Studies 23, 3638-3664.
Maudos, J., de Guevara, F.J., 2004. Factors explaining the interest margin in the banking sectors of the European Union. Journal of Banking and Finance 28, 2259-2281.
Merton, R.C., 1973. Theory of rational option pricing. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 4, 141-183.
Merton, R.C., 1974. On the pricing of corporate debt: the risk structure of interest rates. Journal of Finance 29, 449-470.
Poitevin, M., 1989. Collusion and the banking structure of a duopoly. Canadian Journal of Economics 22, 263-277.
Ronn, E., Verma, A., 1986. Pricing risk-adjusted deposit insurance: an option-based model. Journal of Finance 41, 871-895.
Repullo, R., 2004. Capital requirements, market power, and risk-taking in banking. Journal of Financial Intermediation 13, 156-182.
Saunders, A., Schumacher, L., 2000. The determinants of bank interest rate margins: an international study. Journal of International Money and Finance 19, 813-832.
Tsai, J.Y., Lin, J.H., 2013. Optimal bank interest margin and default risk in equity returns under the return to domestic retail with structural breaks. Applied Economics 45, 753-764.
VanHoose, D., 2007. Theories of bank behavior under capital regulation. Journal of Banking and Finance 31, 3680-3697.
Vassalou, M., Xing, Y., 2004. Default risk in equity returns. Journal of Finance 59, 831-868.
Wong, K.P., 1997. On the determinants of bank interest margins under credit and interest rate risks. Journal of Banking and Finance 21, 251-271.
  • 同意紙本無償授權給館內讀者為學術之目的重製使用,於2014-07-01公開。
  • 同意授權瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2014-07-01起公開。

  • 若您有任何疑問,請與我們聯絡!
    圖書館: 請來電 (02)2621-5656 轉 2281 或 來信