§ 瀏覽學位論文書目資料
系統識別號 U0002-1106200922373100
DOI 10.6846/TKU.2009.01263
論文名稱(中文) 營收動能策略:以台灣股市為例
論文名稱(英文) Sales Momentum Strategies in Taiwan Stock Market
第三語言論文名稱
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中文) 財務金融學系碩士班
系所名稱(英文) Department of Banking and Finance
外國學位學校名稱
外國學位學院名稱
外國學位研究所名稱
學年度 97
學期 2
出版年 98
研究生(中文) 黃怡姿
研究生(英文) Yi-Tzu Huang
學號 696530798
學位類別 碩士
語言別 繁體中文
第二語言別
口試日期 2009-05-27
論文頁數 76頁
口試委員 指導教授 - 林蒼祥
指導教授 - 顧廣平
委員 - 丁予嘉
委員 - 邱靖博
委員 - 段昌文
關鍵字(中) 平均報酬
營收動能效應
標準化未預期營收
關鍵字(英) abnormal return
sales momentum
momentum profits
第三語言關鍵字
學科別分類
中文摘要
本研究主要以台灣證券交易所上市及中華民國證券櫃檯買賣中心上櫃之普通股為研究對象,以個股標準化未預期營收(standardized unexpected sales, SUS)為建構投資策略之依據,針對1993年7月至2008年6月間,股票之每月營收及每月報酬資料進行分析。研究結果顯示,使用全部樣本之營收動能策略,可形成使投資人獲利之贏家組合及動能組合,其中以單月營收(1M)建構之動能策略,較能得到穩定且顯著大於零之平均報酬。另外,經由敏感度分析發現,市場別(上市及上櫃樣本)及產業別(電子股及非電子股樣本)皆存在動能效應,且獲利之來源主要為贏家投資組合,故動能效應對其皆不具敏感度。但若將樣本期間分割為前半段及後半段,則營收動能效應似乎會受到期間不同之影響。另外,不論將樣本分割及期間分割之動能組合之平均報酬,皆隨著持有期間(K)越長,呈現逐漸遞減的趨勢。
為探討動能平均報酬存在可能之因,透過Jensen’s α績效指標,發現風險似乎無法解釋為何存在營收動能效應。另外,以行為財務理論角度來看,發現投資人的反應不足是導致營收動能效應的主要原因。最後,考慮市場摩擦後,台灣股市仍存在可獲利之營收動能效應。
英文摘要
This study uses sales information each calendar month and calculates standardize unexpected sales to establish investment strategies in Taiwan stock exchange market from July 1993 to August 2008. The results reveal that sales momentum strategies could make significant positive returns, especially the strategies established by formation period in recent month(1M)sales. The sensitive analysis find the market exist sales momentum, except the research period division. Besides, the average returns of sales momentum portfolios would be decline by longer holding period.
In order to explain the average returns of sales momentum portfolios, we find market risks seem could not explain why the sales momentum effects exist. If we consider the finance behavior, we find average returns of sales momentum portfolios are due to the market's underreaction to information. However, when we consider market friction, the average returns of sales momentum portfolios still exist in the market.
第三語言摘要
論文目次
目錄
誌謝辭...................................................Ⅰ
中文摘要.................................................Ⅱ
英文摘要.......................................................Ⅲ
目錄.................................................... Ⅳ
表目錄...................................................Ⅴ
圖目錄...................................................Ⅵ
第一章 緒論...............................................1
  第一節
    研究動機與背景........................................1
 第二節
  研究目的..............................................3
 第三節
  研究架構..............................................4
第二章 文獻探討...........................................6
 第一節
  動能投資策略相關文獻探討..............................6
 第二節 
  反向投資策略相關文獻探討.............................12
 第三節 
  影響動量、反向策略投資利潤的重要因素.................18
第三章 研究方法..........................................26
 第一節
  研究資料.............................................26
 第二節
  標準化未預期營收衡量方法.............................27
 第三節
  動能投資策略之形成...................................30
 第四節 
  動能策略績效之計算...................................31
第四章 營收動能策略之績效分析............................33
 第一節
  營收動能策略之績效分析...............................33
 第二節
  敏感性分析...........................................39
第五章 營收動能效應之成因................................50
 第一節
  風險.................................................50
 第二節
  行為財務理論.........................................55
 第三節
  市場摩擦.............................................63
第六章 結論..............................................67
參考文獻.................................................70

表目錄
表3-1 1993/07~2008/06年,本研究所使用之樣本數統計表.........................27
表4-1 營收動能投資策略之平均報酬(%):全部樣本....................................37
表4-2 營收動能投資策略之平均報酬(%):上市、上櫃別..............................41
表4-3 營收動能投資策略之平均報酬(%):產業別…....................................44
表4-4 營收動能投資策略之平均報酬(%):期間分割....................................48
表5-1 營收動能投資策略之Jensen’s α值(%):全部樣本..............................53
表5-2 營收動能組合持有1至60個月之平均報酬及累積平均報酬............58
表5-3 營收動能投資策略之平均報酬(%):考慮交易成本與交易限制........65

圖目錄
圖1-1  研究架構..........................................................................................................5
圖2-1  不同假說下的動能利潤................................................................................10
圖2-2  動能生命週期................................................................................................21
圖5-1  營收動能組合累積平均報酬:隨機漫步模式..............................................60
圖5-2  營收動能組合累積平均報酬:AR(1)模式....................................................61
圖5-3  J=RW(1M)/K=1~60之輸家(R1)、贏家(R5)、動能(R5-R1)組合之平均報酬
       ........................................................................................................................62
參考文獻
中文部份
1.丁碧惠、曾家齊(2005),市場狀態與動能投資策略績效關聯性之研究,台灣金融財務季刊,第6輯第4期,頁1-19。
2.甘逸偉(2001),台灣股市動能策略與過度反應之整合研究,國立成功大學企業管理學研究所碩士論文。
3.李春安、羅進水、蘇永裕(2006),動能策略報酬、投資人情緒與景氣循環之研究,財務金融學刊,第14卷第2期,頁73-109。
4.洪胤傑(2000),台灣股票市場個股與產業動量投資策略之實證研究,國立政治大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
5.許勝吉(1999),台灣股市追漲殺跌策略與反向策略之實證分析比較,輔仁大學管理學研究所未出版碩士論文。
6.陳鴻崑(2000),動量週期與成交量之研究,淡江大學財務金融學系未出版碩士論文。
7.陳正佑(2002),台股動量策略與反向策略投資績效之研究,國立中山大學財務管理研究所未出版博士論文。
8.絲文銘(1994),股票市場過度反應與風險變化關係之探討,證券市場發展季刊,第24期,頁2-37。
9.程淑美(1999),台灣股票市場過度反應現象之實證研究,輔仁大學管理學研究所未出版碩士論文。
10.游奕琪(2000),台灣股市產業與價格動能策略關聯性之實證研究,國立政治大學財務管理學系未出版碩士論文。
11.鄭雅如(2001),動能策略與股票風格在臺灣股市的實證研究,國立政治大學財管研究所碩士論文。
12.謝朝顯(1994),追漲殺跌投資組合策略之實證研究---台灣股市效率性之再檢定,國立台灣大學財務金融研究所未出版碩士論文。
13.鍾豐駿(2001),以產業動量生命週期模型解析日本證券市場超常報酬之來源,銘傳大學金融研究所未出版碩士論文。
14.顧廣平、吳壽山、許和鈞(1995),漲跌幅與公司規模對股票報酬之影響-台灣股票市場之實證研究,證券市場發展季刊,第7期,頁1-28。

英文部份
1. Barberis, N., A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny, (1998), “A model of investor sentiment”, Journal of Financial Economics 49, 307-343.
2. Bacmann, J. F., M. Dubois, and D. Isakov, (2001), “Industries, business cycle and profitability of momentum strategies: An international perspectives,"EFMA 2001 Lugano Meetings.
3. Berk, J. B., R. C. Green, and V. Naik, (1999), “Optimal investment, growth options and security returns,” Journal of Finance 54, 1553-1608.
4. Bernard, V., and J. Thomas, (1989), “Post Earnings Announcement Drift: Delayed Price Response or Risk Premium?” Journal of Accounting Research 27, 1-36.
5. Bernard, V., and J. Thomas, (1990), “Evidence that stock prices do not fully reflect the implications of current earnings for future earnings,” Journal of Accounting and Economics 13, 305-340.
6. Chan, L. K. C., (1988), “On the contrarian investment strategies,” Journal of Business 61, 147-163.
7. Chan, L. K. C., N. Jegadeesh, and J. Lakonishok, (1996), “Momentum Strategies,” Journal of Finance 51, 1681-1713.
8. Chan, K., A. Hameed, and W. Tong, (2000), “Profitability of Momentum Strategies in the International Equity Markets,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 35, 153–172.
9. Chopra, N., J. Lakonishok, and J. Ritter, (1992), “Measuring abnormal returns: Do stocks overreact?” Journal of Financial Economics, 31, 235-268.
10. Chordia, T., and L. Shivakumar, (2002), “Momentum, business cycle and time-varying expected return,” Journal of Finance 57, 985-1019.
11. Chordia, T., and B. Swaminathan, (2000), “Trading Volume and Cross-Autocorrelations in Stock Returns,” Journal of Finance, 55, 913-935.
12. Conrad, J., and G. Kaul, (1993), “Long-term market overreaction or biases in computed returns?,” Journal of Finance 48, 39-63.
13. Conrad, J., and G. Kaul, (1998), “An anatomy of trading strategies,” Review of Financial studies 11, 489-519.
14. Chou, P. H., and H. Chung, (1999), “Formulation versus holding horizons, time series predictability and the performance of contrarian strategies,” Journal of Financial Studies 7, 1 - 27.
15. Chou, P. H., K. C. Wei, and H. Chung, (2007), “Sources of Contrarian Profits in the Japanese Stock Market,” Journal of Empirical Finance 14, 261-286.
16. Cooper, M. J., R. C. Gutierrez Jr., and A. Hameed, (2004), “Market states and momentum,” Journal of Finance 59, 1345-1366.
17. Daniel, K., D. Hirshleifer, and A. Subrahmanyam, (1998), “A theory of overconfidence, self-attribution, and security market under- and overreactions,” Journal of Finance 53, 1839-1886.
18. DeBondt, W. F. M., and R. H. Thaler, (1985), “Does the stock market overreact,” Journal of Finance 40, 793-805.
19. DeBondt, W. F. M., and R. H. Thaler, (1987), “Further evidence on investor overreaction and stock market seasonality,” Journal of Finance 42, 557-581.
20. De Long, J. B., A. Shleifer, L. Summers, and R. J. Waldmann, (1990), “Positive feedback investment strategies and destabilizing rational speculation, ”Journal of Finance 45, 375-395.
21. Edwards, W., (1968), “Conservatism in human information processing,” in B. Kleimutz, ed.: Representation of Human Judgement (John Wiley and Sons, New York)
22. Fama, E. F., and J. MacBeth, (1973), “Risk, return, and, equilibrium: Empirical tests,” Journal of Political Economy 81, 607-636.
23. Foster, G., (1977), “Quarterly Accounting Date: Time-Series Properties and Predictive-Ability Results,” The Accounting Review 52, 1-21.
24. Foster, G., C. Olsen, and T. Shevlin, (1984), “Earnings releases, anomalies, and the behavior of security returns,” The Accounting Review 59, 574-603.
25. Gautam K., and M. Nimalendran, (1990), “Price reversal bid-ask errors or market overreaction?” Journal of Financial Economics 28, 67-93
26. Hong, H., and J. C. Stein, (1999), “A unified theory of underreactiom, momentum trading and overreaction in asset markets,” Journal of Finance 54, 2143-2184.
27. Jegadeesh, N., (1990), “Evidence of predictable behavior of security returns,” Journal of Finance, 45, 881-898.
28. Jegadeesh, N., and S. Titman, (1993), ”Return to buying winners and selling losers: Implications for stock market efficiency,” Journal of Finance 48, 65-91.
29. Jegadeesh, N., and S. Titman, (1995), “Overreaction, delayed reaction and contrarian profits,” Review of Financial studies 8, 973-993.
30. Jegadeesh, N., and S. Titman, (2001), “Profitability of Momentum Strategies: An Evaluation of Alternative Explanations,” Journal of Finance 56, 699-720.
31. Lakonishok, J., A. Shleifer, and R.W. Vishny, (1994), “Contrarian Investment, Extrapolation, and Risk,” Journal of Finance 49, 1541-1578.
32. Lee, C. M. C., and B. Swaminathan, (2000), “Price Momentum and Trading volume,” Journal of Finance 55, 2017-2069.
33. Lehmann, B., (1990), “Fads, Martingales and Market Efficiency,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 105, 1-28.
34. Lo, A. W., and A. C. MacKinlay, (1990), “When are Contrarian Profits due to Overreaction?” Review of Financial Studies 3, 175-205.
35. Moskowitz, T.J., and M. Grinblatt, (1999), “Do Industries Explain Momentum?” Journal of Finance 54, 1249-1290.
36. Richards, A. J., (1997), “Winner-loser reversals in national stock market indices: can they be explained?” Journal of Finance 52, 2129-2144.
37. Rouwenhorst, G. K., (1998), “International momentum strategies,” Journal of Finance 53, 267-284.
38. Rouwenhorst, G. K., (1999), “Local return factors and turnover in emerging stock markets,” Journal of Finance 54, 1439-1464.
39. Schiereck, D., W. F. M. DeBondt, and M. Weber, (1999), “Contrarian and Momentum Strategies in Germany,” Financial Analysts Journal 55, 104-116.
40. Zarwin, P., (1990), “Size, Seasonality, and Stock Market Overreaction”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 25, 113-125.
論文全文使用權限
校內
紙本論文於授權書繳交後5年公開
校內書目立即公開
校外
不同意授權

如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信