§ 瀏覽學位論文書目資料
  
系統識別號 U0002-1101201214284900
DOI 10.6846/TKU.2012.00391
論文名稱(中文) 電子金流與匯兌管理對公司價值影響之研究
論文名稱(英文) TWO ESSAYS RELATED TO THE INFLUENCES OF ELECTRONIC MONEY AND CURRENCY MANAGEMENT ON FIRM VALUE
第三語言論文名稱
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中文) 管理科學學系博士班
系所名稱(英文) Doctoral Program, Department of Management Sciences
外國學位學校名稱
外國學位學院名稱
外國學位研究所名稱
學年度 100
學期 1
出版年 101
研究生(中文) 黃寶玉
研究生(英文) Pao-Yu Huang
學號 897620026
學位類別 博士
語言別 英文
第二語言別
口試日期 2012-01-03
論文頁數 68頁
口試委員 指導教授 - 倪衍森(ysni@mail.tku.edu.tw)
委員 - 邱永和
委員 - 詹乾隆
委員 - 陳勝源
委員 - 張琬喻
委員 - 邱建良
委員 - 黃振豊
委員 - 倪衍森
關鍵字(中) 公司價值
電子金流C計劃
存貨週轉率
營運資金管理
匯兌管理
公司治理
關鍵字(英) Firm Value
Electronic Money C Plan
Inventory Turnover Ratio
Working Capital Management
Foreign Exchange Management
Corporate Governance
第三語言關鍵字
學科別分類
中文摘要
台灣許多企業的活動與進出口有關,近年來,由於國際企業的激烈競爭,使企業的毛利日漸萎縮,是以如何降低成本避免損失,以在競爭激烈的國際市場中生存,成為企業強調的重點。第一篇文章探討企業導入B2B電子金流C計畫與公司價值之關係,結果顯示短期融資有壓力的電子公司比較有導入電子金流的動機,此外發現,企業導入電子金流可改善存貨週轉率進而增加其公司價值。
第二篇文章探討匯兌管理與公司價值之關係,由於如何從會計科目中找尋代表匯兌管理之變數有其困難,因此本研究採用匯兌損益占營業利益之絕對值,取代傳統避險變數作為匯兌管理之代理變數,研究顯示企業維持此比率於較低水準可增進公司價值。
綜合言之,第一篇文章揭示電子金流C計畫可透過財務報表上之存貨周轉率的提升以改善公司價值,第二篇文章說明降低匯率變動之負面衝擊,有助於公司價值的提高。因此,公司應對其財務報表詳細地加以審視,此將有裨益公司財務管理能力的增進,進而提升公司的價值。
英文摘要
Most of business activities have connections with imports and export in Taiwan. Nowadays, the profit margin is shirking gradually due to serious competition of international business. Thus, how to reduce the cost and avoid the loss should be emphasized for enterprises in order to survive in the competitively international markets. Essay one examines the relation between the implementing B2B electronic money C plan and firm value. The results show that companies with trouble in short-term financing would incline to implement electronic money.  Moreover, companies with implementing electronic money would improve turnover ratio of inventory, and then possibly enhance the firm value. 
 Essay two investigates the relation between currency management and firm value. Due to the difficulty of finding accounts representing currency management variables, therefore, we use the absolute value of the exchange gain (loss) over operating income instead of traditional hedging variables as currency management proxy. The empirical results show enterprises with maintaining this ratio at a low level would enhance the firm value.  
In sum, Essay one discloses that implementing electronic C plan might improve the firm value by lifting up inventory turnover ratio. Essay two shows that reducing the risk caused by the fluctuation of exchange rate changes would have negative impact on firm value. Thus, financial statements reviewed carefully would benefit for enhancing the ability of financial management, which might promote the firm value.
第三語言摘要
論文目次
Contents
Contents.......……….........………...........…………..........…………...………….......I
List of Tables……….......……….........………...........………..........……..……......III
List of Figures……….....…………………...……………….….….…….….............IV
Chapter 1  Introduction…………………….............….………...……....................1
Chapter 2  Do B2B Electronic Money C Plans Affect Firm Value? ….….…….4
   2.1  Introduction………………………………………………...…………......4
2.2  Literature Review………………………………………..……………..…9
2.2.1  Brief Introduction of the C Plan…………….….…………….....9
2.2.2  Performance Evaluation………………………………….……11
2.2.3  Performance Evaluation of E-Commerce……………………..13
2.3  Data Collection and Variables Employed.…….………………………..16
2.3.1  Data Collection…………………..……………………………...16
2.3.2  Variables Employed…………………………………………....17
2.3.3  Methodologies……..………..…………………………………..20
2.4  Empirical Results and Analyses…………………………………………21
2.4.1  Descriptive Statistics…………………………….……………..22
2.4.2  Financial Characteristics related to Implementing Electronic
      Money………………..……………………………………….....23
2.4.3  The Effect of Electronic Money Implemented and Financial 
Characteristics on Firm Value……………………....................25
2.4.4  The Effect of Electronic Money Implemented on Turnover
 Ratios related to Cash Conversion Cycle……………..…..…..27
2.5  Summary Remarks…..…………………………………………………..30

Chapter 3  Does Currency Management Matter for Firm Value?……………..33
    3.1  Introduction………………………………………………………..….…33
 3.2  Data Collection and Variable Employed……...............………….…….37
3.2.1  Data Collection…………………………………………….........37
3.2.2  Variable Employed……………………………………………..37
 3.3  Empirical Results and Analysis…………….…………...….……….…..44
3.3.1  Descriptive Statistics………………….…………………….…..44
3.3.2  Financial Characteristics and Currency Management for
      Firm Value…………………………………….…….….….……45
  3.4  Summary Remarks……………………………………....…….….....…54

Chapter 4  Conclusions and Suggestions…………..………………….……….…57
References……………………………………………………………….…..………62
List of Tables

Table 2-1  Descriptive statistics………………………………………………..…...23
Table 2-2  Empirical results for logit regression models…………...…………...….24
Table 2-3  Empirical results for panel data models………………………….…..….26
Table 2-4  Multiple regression analysis of A/R turnover ratio………….…...….......28
Table 2-5  Multiple regression analysis of Inventory turnover ratio…...….……......29
Table 2-6  Multiple regression analysis of A/P turnover ratio………..……….........30
Table 3-1  Summary statistics…………………………………………………...….44
Table 3-2  Model I….……..………………………………….…………...………...47
Table 3-3  Model II…….……………….…………………………………………..49
Table 3-4  Model III……………….……………….…………………….…………52
List of Figures

Figure 2-1  The operating cycle and the cash cycle…………………….... ……….…7
參考文獻
Adams R, H. Almeida, and D. Ferreira. 2005. Powerful CEOs and their impact on corporate performance. Review of Financial Studies 18(4): 1403-1432. 
Allayannis, G. and J. Weston. 2001. The use of foreign currency derivatives and firm market value. Review of Financial Studies 14: 243-276.
Barton, J. 2001. Does the use of financial derivatives affect earnings management decisions? The Accounting Review 76: 1-26.
Bartram, S. M., G. W. Brown, and F. R. Fehle. 2009. International evidence on financial derivatives usage. Financial Management 38: 185–206.
Bauer, R., B. Frijns, R. Otten, and A. Tourani-Rad. 2008. The impact of corporate governance on corporate performance: Evidence from Japan. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 16(3): 236-251.
Bebchuk, L. A., Y. Grinstein, and U. Peyer. 2010. Lucky CEOs and lucky directors. Journal of Finance 65: 2363–2401.
Berkman, H. and M. E. Bradbury. 1996. Empirical evidence on the corporate use of derivatives. Financial Management 25: 5-13.
Bhagat, S., D. C. Carey, and C. M. Elson. 1999. Director ownership, corporate performance, and management turnover. Business Lawyer 54: 885-919.
Black, B., I. Love, and A. Rachinsky. 2006. Corporate governance indices and firms’ market value: Time series evidence from Russia. Emerging Markets Review 7: 361-379. 
Block, S. B. and T. J. Gallagher. 1986. The use of interest rate futures and options by corporate financial managers. Financial Management 15: 73-78.
Bondar, G. M. and W. H. Centry. 1993. Exchange rate exposure and industry characteristics: Evidence from Canada, Japan and USA. Journal of International Money and Finance 12: 29-45.
Borokhovich, K. A., K. R. Brunarski, C. E. Crutchley, and B. J. Simkins. 2004. Board composition and corporate use of interest rate derivatives. Journal of Financial Research 27(2): 199-216.
Bris A., Y. Koskinen, and M. Nilsson. 2009. The euro and corporate valuations. Review of Financial Studies 22(8): 3171-3209.
Carter, D., D. Rogers, and B. Simkins. 2003. Does fuel hedging make economics sense? The case of the US airline industry. Working paper, Oklahoma State University.
Cheng, M. S., H. Y. Chen, and C. H. Lin. 2004. A study of the firms’ internal factors that influence the performance of the business use of e-commerce. Chung Hua Journal of Management 5: 1-22.
Campello, M., C. Lin, Y. Ma, and H. Zou. 2011. The real and financial implications of corporate hedging. Journal of Finance 66: 1615–1647.
Chiu, B. G. 2003. A Study on the Affect of IPOs After-Market Price Performance. Graduate Institute of Banking and Finance, Tamkang University, Master Thesis.
Chopra, S. and J. A. Van Mieghem. 2000. Which e-business is right for your supply chain? Supply Chain Management Review 4(3): 32-40.
Claessens, S., S. Djankov, J. Fan and H. P. Lang. 2002. Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. Journal of Finance 57: 2741-2742.
Clark, B. H. 1999. Marketing performance measures: History and interrelationships. Journal of Marketing Management 15(8): 711-732.
Clemons, E. K., P. R. Sashidhap, and R. Michael. 1993. The impact of information technology on the organization of economic activity: The “move to the middle” hypothesis. Journal of Management Information Systems 10(2): 9-35.
Coles J. L., N. Daniel, and L. Naveen. 2008. Boards: Does one size fit all? Journal of Financial Economics 87: 329–2001. 
David, E. 2003. Measuring e-procurement benefits. Summit 6(1): 17.
Delaney, J. T. and M. A. Huselid. 1996. The impact of human resource management practices on perceptions of organization performance. Academy of Management Journal 40(1): 88-171.
Demsetz, H. 1983. The structure of corporate ownership and the theory of the firm. Journal of Law and Economics 26(1): 375-390.
Demsetz, H. and B. Villalonga. 2001. Ownership structure and corporate performance. Journal of Corporate Finance 7: 209-233.
Dess, G. C. and R. B. Robinson. 1989. Measuring organizational performance in the absence of object measures. Strategic Management Journal 5: 667-695.
Dugrette, D. J. and A. M. Stowe. 1993. A performance measurement model for the office of inspector general. Government Accounts 42(2): 27-50.
Dyer, L. and T. Reeves. 1995. Human resource strategies and firm performance: What do we know and where do we need to go? The 10th World congress of the International Industrial Relation Association.
Eisenberg T, S. Sundgren and T. W. Wells. 1998. Larger board size and decreasing firm value in small firms. Journal of Financial Economics 48: 35-54.
El-Sway, O. A., A. Malhotra, S. Gosain and K. M. Young. 1999. IT-intensive value innovation in the electronic economy: Insights from Marshall industries. MIS Quarterly 23(3): 305-335.
Fauver, L. and A. Naranjo. 2010. Derivative usage and firm value: The influence of agency costs and monitoring problems. Journal of Corporate Finance 16(5): 719-735.
Fairchild, A. 2005. Integrating efficiencies in the financial supply chain. Supply Chain Management 10: 244-248.
Franks, J. and C. Mayer. 1994. The Ownership and Control of German Corporations, London Business School, London.
Geczy, C. B., A. Minton, and C. Schrand. 1997. Why firms use currency derivatives? Journal of Finance 52: 1323-1354.
Germain, R. and K. N. S. Iyer. 2006. The interaction of internal and downstream integration and its association with performance. Journal of Business Logistics 27(2): 29-52.
Gompers, P., J. Ishii, and A. Metrick. 2003. Corporate governance and equity prices. Quarterly Journal of Economics 118(1): 107-155. 
Gorton, G. and F. Schmid. 1999. Corporate governance, ownership dispersion and efficiency: Empirical evidence from the Austrian cooperative banking. Journal of Corporate Finance 5: 199-40.
Graham, J. R. and D. A. Rogers. 2002. Do firms hedge in response to tax incentives? Journal of Finance 57: 815–839.
Guay, W. R. 1999. The impact of derivatives on firm risk: An empirical examination of new derivative users, Journal of Accounting and Economics 26: 319-351.
Guay, W. and S. P. Kothari. 2003. How much do firms hedge with derivatives? Journal of Financial Economics 70: 423-461.
He, J. and L. K. Ng. 1998. The foreign exchange exposure of Japanese multinational corporations. Journal of Finance 53: 733-753.
Hill, M. D., G. W. Kelly, and M. J. Highfield. 2010. Net operating working capital behavior: A first look. Financial Management 39: 783-805.
Huang, B. 2006. A Study on the Performance Measurement of E-Cash in Supply Chain- A Case of Hua Nan Commercial Bank, Executive Management Business Administration Program of National Cheng Kung University, Master Thesis.
Huang, P., Y. Zhang, D. R. Deis, and J. S. Moffitt. 2009. Do artificial income smoothing and real income smoothing contribute to firm value equivalently? Journal of Banking and Finance 33(2): 224-233
Jeffrey L. C., M. L. Lemmon, and J. F. Meschke. 2012. Structural models and endogeneity in corporate finance: The link between managerial ownership and corporate performance. Journal of Financial Economics 103(1): 149-168.
Jensen, M. C. and W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency cost and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3(4): 305-360.
Jensen, M. C. and R. S. Ruback. 1983. Market for corporate control: The scientific evidence. Journal of Financial Economics 11(4): 5-50.
Jih, W. J. 2002. Effects of electronic commerce implementation in Taiwan. Journal of Computer Information Systems 42(3): 68-76.
Jin, Y. and P. Jorion. 2006. Firm value and hedging: Evidence from U.S. oil and gas producers. Journal of Finance 61: 893-919.
Jorion, P. 1991. The pricing of exchange rate risk in the stock market. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 26: 363-376.
Kale, J. R., E. Reis, and A. Venkateswaran. 2009. Rank-order tournaments and incentive alignment: The effect on firm performance. Journal of Finance 64: 1479-1512.
Kim, S. W. 2006. Effects of supply chain management practices, integration and competition capability on performance. Supply chain Management 11(3): 241-248.
Knill, B. 2000. How to make e-commerce work for you? Material Handling Management 55(5): 48-51.
Lai, V. S. and B. K. Wong. 2005. Business types, e-strategies, and performance. Communications of the ACM 48(5): 80-85.
La Porta, R., F. Lopez-deSilances, and A. Shleifer. 1999. Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance 54: 471-517.
Lee, T. S. and Y. H. Yeh. 2004. Corporate governance and financial distress: Evidence from Taiwan. Corporate Governance: An International Review 12: 378–388.
Lee, W. C. 2005. Evaluation of the Benefits of Bank and Electronic Industry Participating into Government “C” Plan, Graduate School of Business Administration, Chung Yuan Christian University, Master Thesis.
Lehn, K., J. Netter, and A. Poulsen. 1990. Consolidating corporate control: Dual-class recapitalizations versus leveraged buyouts. Journal of Financial Economics 27: 557-580.
Linsa, K. V., H. Servaes, and P. Tufano. 2010. What drives corporate liquidity? An international survey of cash holdings and lines of credit, Journal of Financial Economics 98(1): 160-176. 
Masulis, R. W. and S. Mobbs. 2011. Are all inside directors the same? Evidence from the external directorship market. Journal of Finance 66: 823–872.
McConnel, J. and C. Muscarella. 1985. Corporate capital expenditure decisions and the market value of the firm. Journal of Financial Economics 14: 399-422.
McConnell J. and H. Servaes. 1990. Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value. Journal of Financial Economics 27: 595-612.
Meng R., X. Ning, X. Zhou, and H. Zhu. 2011. Do ESOPs enhance firm performance? Evidence from China’s reform experiment. Journal of Banking & Finance 35(6): 1541-1551
Mian, S. L. 1996. Evidence on corporate hedging policy. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 31: 419-439.
Miller, M. and F. Modigliani. 1958. The cost of capital, corporate finance and the theory of investment. American Economic Review 53: 261-297.
Morck, R., A. Shleifer, and R. W. Vishny. 1988. Management ownership and market valuation. Journal of Financial Economics 20: 293-315.
Morck, R. and B. Yeung. 1991. Why investors value multinationality? Journal of Business 64(2): 165-187.
Murphy, G. B., J. W. Trailer, and R. C. Hill. 1996. Measuring performance in entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Research 36(1): 15-23.
Nance, D. R., C. W. Smith, and C. W. Smithson. 1993. On the determinants of corporate hedging. Journal of Finance 48: 267-281.
Oswald, S. L. and J. Jahera. 1991. The influence of ownership on performance: An empirical study. Strategic Management Journal 12: 218-228.
Petersen, M. A. 2009. Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. Review of Financial Studies 22: 435-480.
Porter, M. E. 1997. Company and industry financial performance. [Online]. Available: http://www.people.hbs.edu/mporter/firm- financperform.htm.
Power, D. 2004. The comparative importance of human resource management practices in the context of business to business electronic commerce. Information Technology and People 17(4): 380-406.
Power, D. 2005. Determinants of business-to-business e-commerce implementation and performance: A structural model. Supply Chain Management 10(2): 96-113.
Prevost, A., R. Rao, and M. Hossain. 2002. Determinants of board composition in New Zealand: A simultaneous equations approach. Journal of Empirical Finance 9: 373-397. 
Ross, S. A., R. W. Westerfield, J. F. Jaffe, and B. D. Jordan. 2009. Corporate Finance: Core Principles and Applications, 2nd edition, McGraw Hill, New York.
Shleifer, A. and R. Vishny. 1997. A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics 52: 737-785.
Smith, C. and R. Stulz. 1985. The determinants of firms’ hedging policies. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 20: 391-405.
Stock, G. N., N. P. Greis, and J. D. Kasarda. 2000. Enterprise logistics and supply chain structure: The role of fit. Journal of Operations Management 18: 531-547.
Subramani, M. and E. Walden. 2001. The impact of e-commerce announcements on the market value of firms. Information Systems Research 12(2): 135-154.
Tobin, J. 1969. A general equilibrium approach to monetary theory. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 1(1): 15-29.
Tsou, Y. H. 2003. The Study on Financial Performance Changes Associated with Strategic Alliances: A Case of Taiwanese Semiconductor Industry, Graduate School of Business Administration, Chung Yuan Christian University, Master Thesis.
Varshney, U. and R. Vetter. 2002. Mobile commerce: Framework, applications and networking support. Mobile Networks and Applications 7(3): 185-198.
Venkatraman, N. and V. Ramanujam. 1986. Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches. Academy of Management Review 11(4): 801-814.
Vickery, S. K. 1991. A theory of production competence revisited. Decision Sciences 22(3): 635-643.
Wong, M. H. F. 2000. The association between SFAS No. 119 derivatives discloses and the foreign exchange risk exposure of manufacturing firms. Journal of Accounting Research 38: 387-417.
Yang, M. H. and H. L. Chen. 2001. A study on the relationship among adoption factors, implementation strategies, and performance of enterprise’s electronic commerce application. Journal of Information Management 8(2): 23-44. 
Yermack, D. 1996. Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics 40: 185-211.
論文全文使用權限
校內
校內紙本論文立即公開
同意電子論文全文授權校園內公開
校內電子論文於授權書繳交後5年公開
校外
同意授權
校外電子論文於授權書繳交後5年公開

如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信