台灣自從1987 年解嚴之後，隨之而來的是政黨的開放，使人民
選舉權的擴大，政黨在政治體系中所扮演的關鍵角色，也越來越受
到重視。換言之，民眾對政黨的信任與否，將是學界及實務界必須
探討的一個議題。
本文具體的研究問題為：(1) 台灣民眾十年來 (2001 年到2011
年)政黨信任的分布狀況為何？(2) 影響台灣民眾政黨信任的因素為
何？(3) 政黨信任所產生的政治後果為何？此處的政治後果特別意
指投票參與、對民主的滿意程度。並以「台灣政黨體系的制度化：
大眾政治態度面向的探討」國科會計畫所進行之電話訪問資料，為
本研究之資料來源。
研究結果發現，台灣民眾政黨信任相當低落。政黨信任的來源
可以用「終生學習模型」來解釋。至於民眾的政黨信任則對投票參
與、民主滿意度皆有其正面的助益。

Since 1987, after the lifting of the martial law in Taiwan, followed by the opening
party, so that the expansion of people’s right to vote, political parties in the political
system played a key role in more and more attention. In other words, whether or not the
public trust in political parties, academics and practitioners will be one of the topics to be
discussed.
This study is intended to explore the following research questions as: (1) What is the
distribution of party trust in Taiwan? (2) What are the origins of party trust? (3) What
are the political consequences of party trust? The data come from the
“Institutionalization of Party System in Taiwan: An Analysis on the Mass Political
Attitudes.”
This study reveals that the party trust in Taiwan is not in the high level. The origins
of party trust can use lifetime learning model to explanation. And the political
consequences of party trust is include the vote and satisfaction with democracy.

第一章 研究動機與目的………………………………..……………………………….……………….…...…....1
第二章 文獻檢閱………………….………….…………………….………...………....….4
第一節 政治態度的涵義…………………………………………….………..…..……4
第二節 政治信任…………………………………….………………..……..…………5
第三節 權威機構信任與政黨信任…………………………………….………………7
一、民眾信不信任政黨之影響因素………………..……….…………..……..…..9
二、民眾信不信任政黨之政治後果…………………..………………...….…..…13
第四節 研究設計……………………………………....…………………………..…..16
一、研究問題………………………………..……………………..….……...……16
二、研究方法與資料來……………..……………..…………………….………...16
三、研究架構……………………..…………………………………………..……17
第三章 政黨信任與社會信任、政黨短期表現、政黨長期認知之評價…….…......…19
第四章 政黨信任之影響因素與政治後果….……………..……….….………..………27
第一節 政黨信任之影響因素………...….……..…………..……..……………..…..28
第二節 政黨信任之政治後果……………..……..…………………………...….…..33
第五章 結論…………………..………………………..………………...…….…......…..39
第一節 研究發現…………….………..….………………..……..……………..……40
第二節 研究限制與建議……………….…………………………………….......…..41
附錄一 台灣民眾對權威機構的信任(2001-2009)…………..….…………….….……..42
附錄二 四地區民眾權威機構信任度之平均值………….………...…………………...43
附錄三 變項測量與處理方式……………………….…………………………….…….44
附錄四 民眾對政黨長期評價之因素分析…………….….……….…………...….……50
參考文獻…………………………………….…………………………….………....……52

圖表目次
圖1-1 研究架構圖…………………………………………………..17
表3-1 政黨信任與社會信任之交叉分析…………….…………20
表3-2 政黨信任與政黨短期表現之交叉分析……………21
表3-3 政黨信任與政黨長期認知之交叉分析……………….…25
表4-1 影響台灣民眾政黨信任之因素………………..…...32
表4-2 灣民眾政黨信任之政治後果……………….……37

中文部分
王中天，2010，〈當社會信任遇見政治信任─對政治文化觀點的整合與檢驗〉，《台
灣民主季刊》，7(4)：47-83。
王靖興、孫天龍，2005，〈台灣民眾民主政治評價影響因素之分析〉，《台灣民主
季刊》，2(3)：55-79。
林瓊珠、蔡佳泓，2010，〈政黨信任、機構信任與民主滿意度〉，《政治與社
會哲學評論》，35：147-194。
林聰吉，2007，〈解析台灣民主政治：以民主支持度與滿意度為觀察指標〉，
《選舉研究》，14(1)：61-84。
林聰吉，2009。《台灣民眾的政治疏離感》，國科會研究計畫(計畫編號
97-2410-H-032-021-SSS)。
林聰吉，2011，《台灣政黨體系的制度化：大眾政治態度面向的探討》，國
科會研究計畫(計畫編號98-2410-H-032-027-MY2)。
胡佛、朱雲漢，2001。《第一波「亞洲民主動態調查」》（95R0064-AH02-00）。台
北：國立臺灣大學東亞民主研究中心。
胡佛、朱雲漢，2006。《第二波「亞洲民主動態調查」》（95R0064-AH02-00）。台
北：國立臺灣大學東亞民主研究中心。
胡佛、游盈隆，1983。〈選民的投票取向:結構與類型分析〉，《政治學報》，11：
223-79。
陳陸輝，2003，〈政治信任、施政表現與民眾對台灣民主的展望〉，《台灣政治學
刊》，7(2)：149-188。
陳陸輝，2006，〈政治信任的政治後果─以2004 年立法委員選舉為例〉，《台灣
民主季刊》，3(2)：39-63。
陳陸輝，2007，〈台灣民眾政治支持的初探〉，「2007 年台灣政治學會年會暨台灣
民主的挑戰與前景學術研討會」論文，(11 月17-18 日)，台北：政治大學。
盛杏湲、黃士豪，2006，〈台灣民眾為甚麼討厭立法院？〉，《台灣民主季刊》，3
(3)：85-128。
盛治仁，2003，〈台灣民眾民主價值及政治信任感研究─政黨輪替前後的比較〉，
《選舉研究》，10(1)：115-169。
莊天憐，2001，〈我國獨立選民的發展與變遷(1989~1999)〉，《選舉研究》，8(1)：
71-115。
彭芸，2002，〈2001 年台灣選民的媒介行為與政治信任〉，《選舉研究》，9(2)：1-36。
52
英文部分
Abramson, Paul R. 1983. Political Attitudes in American: Formation and Change.
San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Company Press.
Almond, Gabriel A., and Sidney Verba. 1963. The Civil Culture: Political Attitudes
and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Bianco, William. 1994. Trust: Representatives and Constituents. Ann Arbor:
University of Michigan Press.
Bratton, Michael, Yun-han Chu, Marta Lagos, and Richard Rose. 2005. “The People’s
Voice: Trust in Political Institutions.” In Ten Years of Support Democracy
Worldwide. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral
Assistance, pp 61-71.
Clarke, Harold D., Nitish Dutt, and Allan Kornberg. 1993. “The Political Economy
of Attitudes toward Polity and Society in Western European Democracies.”
Journal of Politics 55(4): 998-1021.
Dalton, Russell J., and Martin P. Wattenberg, ed. 2000. Parties Without Partisans:
Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Dalton, Russell J. and Steven Weldon. 2005. “Public Images of Political Parties: A
Necessary Evil？” West European Politics 28: 931-951.
Dalton, Russell J. 2007. Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices: The Erosion
of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Diamond, Larry, and Richard Gunther, ed. 2001. Political Parties and Democracy.
Ballimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Easton, David. 1975. “A Re-assessment of the Concept of Political Support.” British
Journal of Political Science 5: 435-457.
Gidengil, E., A. Blais, N. Nevitte and R. Nadeau. 2001. “The Correlates and
Consequences of Anti-partyism in the 1997 Canadian Election.” Party Politics
7(4): 491-451.
Hall, Peter. 1999. “Social Capital in Britain.” British Journal of Political Science
29:417-61.
Hetherington, Marc J. 1999. “The Effect of Political Trust on the Presidential Vote,
1968-96.” American Political Science Review 93(2): 311-326.
Hetherington, Marc J. 2005. Why Trust Matters: Declining Political Trust and
Demise of American Liberalism. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University
Press.
Huntington, Samuel P. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth
53
Century. Norman and Lond: University of Oklahoma Press.
Job, Jenny. 2005. “How is Trust in Government Created? It Begins at Home, but
Ends in the Parliament.” Australian Review of Public Affairs 6(1):1-23.
Key, V.O., Jr. 1964. Politics, Parties, and Pressure Groups, 5th ed. New York:
Crowell.
Linde, Jonas, and Joakim Ekman. 2003. “Satisfaction with Democracy: A Note on a
Frequently Used Indicator in Comparative Politics.” European Journal of
Political Research 42(3): 391-408.
Lipset, Seymour M. 1981. Political Man. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Mair, P. 2005. “Democracy beyond Parties” paper presented at the annual sessions of
the European Consortium for Political Research, Grenada, Spain.
Merkl, Peter H. 1988. “Comparing Legitimacy and Values among Advanced
Democratic Countries.” In Comparing Pluralist Democracies: Strains in
Legitimacy, Mattei Dogan, ed. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
Millbrath, Lester, and M.L. Goel. 1977. Political Participation. Chicago: Rand
McNally.
Miller, Arthur H. 1974. “Political Issues and Trust in Government, 1964-1970.”
American Political Science Review 68: 951-972.
Miller, Arthur, and Ola Listhaug. 1990. “Political Parties and Confidence in
Government.” British Journal of Political Science 29: 357-386.
Miller, Arthur, and Ola Listhaug. 1999. “Political Performance and Institutional
Trust.” In Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government, ed.
Pippa Norris. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mishler, William, and Richard Rose. 1997. “Trust, Distrust, and Skepticism: Popular
Evaluations of Civil of Political Institutions in post-Communist Societies.”
Joural of Political 59(2): 418-451.
Mishler, William, and Richard Rose. 2001. “What are the Origins of Political Trust？
Testing Institutional and Cultural Theories in Post-Communist Societies.”
Comparative Political Studies 34(1): 30-62.
Newton, Kenneth, and Pippa Norris. 2000. “Confidence in public institutions: Faith,
Culture, or Performance?” In Disaffected Democracies: What's Troubling the
Trilateral Democracies?, eds. Susan J. Pharr and Robert D. Putnam. Princeton,
NJ: Princeton University Press.
Norris, Pippa. 1999a. “Introduction: The Growth of Critical Citizens？” In Critical
Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government, ed. Pippa Norris. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Norris, Pippa. 1999b. “Institutional Explanations for Political Support.” In Critical
Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government, ed. Pippa Norris. Oxford:
54
Oxford University Press.
Ostrom, Charles W., Jr., and Dennis M. Simon. 1985. “Promise and Performance: A
Dynamic Model of Presidential Popularity.” American Political Science Review
79(2): 334-58.
Patterson, T. E. 1993. Out of Order. New York: Vintage Press.
Patterson, Orlando. 1999. “Liberty against the Democratic Sate: on the Historical
and Contemporary Sources of American Distrust.” In Democracy and Trust, ed.
Mark Warren. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Przeworski, Adam, Michael Alvarez, Jose A. Cheibub & Fernando Limongi. 1996.
“What Makes Democracies Endure?” Journal of Democracy 7(1): 39-55.
Putnam, Robert D. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Tradition in Modern Italy.
Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Putnam, Robert D. 1995. “Tuning In, Tuning Out: The Strange Disappearance of
Social Capital in America.” Political Science and Politics 28: 664-683.
Schmitt, Hermann. 1983. “Party Government in Public Opinion: A European
Cross-National Comparison.” European Journal of Political Research
11(4):353-76.
Seligman, Adam. 1997. The Problems of Trust. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University
Press.
Shively, W. Philips. 1972. “Party Identification, Party Choice, and Voting Democracies:
Results From Eight Panel Surveys.” Comparative Political Studies 30: 450-483.
Stokes, Donald E. 1962. “Popular Evaluations of Government: An Empirical
Assessment.” In Ethics and Bigness: Scientific, Academic, Religious, Political,
and Military, ed. Harlan Cleveland and Harold D. Lasswell. NewYork: Harper
and Brothers.
Warren, Mark E. 1999. Democracy and Trust. New York: Cambridge University
Press.
Wattenberg, M. 2003. Where Have all the Voters Gone？ Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press.
Williams, B. 1985. “Systematic Influences on Political Trust: the Importance of
Perceived Institutional Performance.” Political Methodology 11(2): 125-142.