系統識別號 | U0002-1008201814001700 |
---|---|
DOI | 10.6846/TKU.2018.00289 |
論文名稱(中文) | 在登盛政府執政下緬甸之發展 (2011 – 2015) |
論文名稱(英文) | EU - Myanmar Relations Development During Thein Sein Presidency (2011-2015) |
第三語言論文名稱 | |
校院名稱 | 淡江大學 |
系所名稱(中文) | 臺灣與亞太研究全英語碩士學位學程 |
系所名稱(英文) | Master's Program in Taiwan and Asia-Pacific Studies, College of International Studies (English-Taught Program) |
外國學位學校名稱 | |
外國學位學院名稱 | |
外國學位研究所名稱 | |
學年度 | 106 |
學期 | 2 |
出版年 | 107 |
研究生(中文) | 大衛 |
研究生(英文) | David Slawinski |
學號 | 605245041 |
學位類別 | 碩士 |
語言別 | 英文 |
第二語言別 | |
口試日期 | 2018-06-25 |
論文頁數 | 112頁 |
口試委員 |
指導教授
-
林若雩
委員 - 卓忠宏 委員 - 左正東 |
關鍵字(中) |
東南亞 緬甸 民主化 非民主政權 歐盟 聯繫 槓桿 |
關鍵字(英) |
South East Asia Myanmar Democratization Undemocratic regimes European Union linkage leverage |
第三語言關鍵字 | |
學科別分類 | |
中文摘要 |
本篇論文研究論述登盛政府成立後緬甸的發展,這項研究主要著重於分析緬甸在2011 - 2015年間發生的國內變化。理論上,定義非民主政體和民主化進程有關之用語,並將用來說明現任政府的相關作為。 在登盛政府執政期間,該政府進行了許多改革以幫助緬甸重新與國際社會接軌,透過分析進而探討緬甸國內生產總值,通貨膨脹和外國直接投資指數,分析改革和進入國際社會所帶來之影響。 歐盟於二零一二年解除了二十世紀九十年代的經濟制裁後,歐盟及緬甸雙邊關係進入了新階段。緬甸主要著重在體現歐盟與政府和社會的整合。此外,本研究使用了史蒂文˙ 萊維莰基的聯繫和槓桿理論進而描述並評估歐盟的社會、經濟間交流與政府間關係。 此外,本篇研究將討論緬甸對歐盟的立場,進一步探討論述。 |
英文摘要 |
The diploma thesis deals with the development of Myanmar after the establishment of Thein Sein’s civilian government. The study focuses on the analysis of domestic changes that occurred during the period of 2011-2015. In the theoretical part the terms connected with non-democratic regimes and democratization processes are defined and will be used to describe Sein’s government. During Sein’s presidency, numerous reforms have been introduced which led Myanmar to re-connect with the international community. An analysis on the impact of the reforms and entrance to the international community will be made by analysing and discussing Myanmar’s Gross Domestic Product, inflation and foreign direct investment indexes. The European Union entered a new phase of EU – Myanmar bilateral relations when the 1990’s economic sanctions were lifted in 2012. It’s behaviour pivot towards Myanmar its primarily visible in EU’s integration with the government and society. Therefore, EU’s social, economic, communication and intergovernmental ties will be described and evaluated with the Linkage and Leverage model of Levitsky & Way. Moreover, Myanmar’s position towards the EU will be discussed. |
第三語言摘要 | |
論文目次 |
1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 PERSONAL MOTIVATION 3 1.2 RESEARCH QUESTIONS 4 1.3 RESEARCH OBJECTIVES 5 1.4 STRUCTURE OF THE THESIS 6 2.RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 6 2.3 LITERATURE REVIEW 8 2.4 RESEARCH DESIGN FRAMEWORK 10 2.4.1 THE (NEO) CLASSICAL INTEGRATION THEORY 11 2.3.3 DEMOCRACY 18 2.3.4. LINKAGE & LEVERAGE 25 3.HISTORIC BACKGROUND IN THE EUROPE – MYANMAR RELATIONS (1962 – 1988) 27 4. EU – ASEAN (MYANMAR) RELATIONS DEVELOPMENT 29 4.1 DIALOGE STRUCTURE 33 4.2 MYANMAR ACCEPTANCE IN TO ASEAN 35 4.3 EU INFLUENCE ON MYANMARS 2006 ASEAN CHAIRMANSHIP 38 4.4 HUMAN RIGHTS, THE SLOW RESOLUTION OF THE CORE DISPUTE 41 5. MYANMARS PATH TOWARDS DEMOCRACY – SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC BACKGROUND 46 5.1 PARLAMENT ELECTIONS 2010 48 5.2. THEIN SEIN INAUGURATION 51 4.3 MYANMAR'S INTERNAL CHANGES 54 5.4 FREEDOM IN THE WORLD INDEX 56 5.5 CORRUPTION INDEX 58 5.6. ETHNIC CLASHES 60 5.7 ECONOMIC CHANGES 62 5.8. ECONOMIC INDICATORS 64 5.8.1. FDI 64 5.8.2 GDP 69 5.8.3. INFLATION AND UNEMPLOYMENT RATE 70 5.8.4 EXPORT & IMPORT 71 5.8.5 CORRUPTION 72 6. EU’S ROLE IN MYANMAR 74 6.1 BACKGROUND 74 6.2. MYANMAR'S POSITION TOWARDS EU 76 6.3 EU PROJECTS IN MYANMAR 79 6.4. SOCIAL PROJECTS 81 6.4.1. FREEDOM OF NEWS 81 6.4.2. UNIVERSITIES 82 6.4.3. PEACE PROCESS 83 6.4.4. POLICE TRAININGS 85 6.5 EU’S POSITION IN MYANMAR’S ECONOMY 86 6.5.1 EXPORT & IMPORT 88 6.6 EU’s POSITION TO THE ROHINGYA CRISIS 91 7. LEVERAGE AND LINKAGE ANALYSIS 92 7.1 MYANMARS LEVERAGE 92 7.1.1 LEVERAGE SCORE 93 7.2. EU – MYANMAR LINKAGE 93 7.2.1 ECONOMIC LINKAGE 93 7.2.2 SOCIAL LINKAGE 95 7.2.3 COMMUNICATION LINKAGE 96 7.2.4. INTERGOVERMENTAL LINKAGE 97 7.2.5 LINKAGE SCORE 98 8. CONCLUSION 99 Bibliography 103 APPENDIX I 111 APPENDIX II 112 List of Figures Figure 1 Research Design Framework 10 Figure 2 Economic Integration Stages 13 Figure 3 Chart of Developments in FDI Received 16 Figure 4 EU FDI in ASEAN 46 Figure 5 Figure Freedom in Myanmar 58 Figure 6 Figure Freedom Index 59 Figure 7 Foreign Investment in Myanmar 66 Figure 8 Distribution of Foreign Investment 67 Figure 9 Development of FDI in Myanmar 68 Figure 10 Myanmar GDP Development 69 Figure 11 Inflation and Unemployment Rate 70 Figure 12 Development of Foreign Trade in Burma 2003 – 2014 71 Figure 13 EU Foreign Direct Investment in Myanmar (000) in USD 90 Figure 14 Total Leverage Score between EU and Myanmar 93 Figure 15 EU - Myanmar Export - Import 94 Figure 16 Linkage Score EU 98 List of Table Table 1 Economic Integration Stages 12 Table 2 Diamonds Democratic State Criteria's 19 |
參考文獻 |
ADB (2015): “Civil Society Briefs: Myanmar” Asian Development Bank. Myanmar Resident Mission, Myanmar office. February 2015. Accessed 17.02.2018: http://www.adb.org/publications/civil-society-briefsmyanmar Amnesty International (2015): “Caught between state censorship and self-censorship: Prosecution and intimidation of media workers in Myanmar”. Published by Amnesty International Ltd. Accessed 06.05.18: https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/asa16/1743/2015/en/ ASEAN – EU Ministerial Meeting,1994. Joint Declaration of the 11th ASEAN – EU Ministerial Meeting in Karlsruhe, Germany. Aseansec.org [online]. Accessed. 01.22.2018 URL: http://asean.org/?static_post=joint- declaration-the-eleventh-asean-eu-ministerial-meeting-karlsruhe-22-23-september-1994 Asian Legal Resource Centre, Myanmar at Risk of Land-Grabbing Epidemic. [online]. 2012. cit. 2018 – 06- 01]. Accessed :http://Barma.burmapartnership.org/2012/06/myanmar- myanmar-atrisk-of-land-grabbing-epidemic/ Aung, H.., Hundreds protest restart of China backed copper mine in Myanmar. [online]. Reuters. 2016 [cit. 2018- 03-25]. : Available: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-myanmar-mine-protests/hundreds-protest-restart-of- china-backed-copper-mine-in-myanmar-idUSKCN0XX15A Balassa, B. 1961. The Theory of Economic Integration [first edition]. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd. Beke, Laura, and Nicolas Hachez. "The EU GSP: A Preference for Human Rights and Good Governance? The Case of Myanmar." Global Governance through Trade: 185-213. doi:10.4337/9781783477760.00015. "Belgium,Myanmar : EU COMMISSION and MYANMAR Ink a New International Arbitration Agreement." Mena Report, March 10, 2014. Accessed April 19, 2018. http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-361032687.html?refid=easy_hf. "Belgium,Myanmar : The European Union and Myanmar: A Special Partnership for Democracy, Peace and Prosperity." Mena Report, June 2, 2016. Accessed 01.19. 2018. http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-456872527.html?refid=easy_hf. BERTELSMANN Foundation. Myanmar Country Report [online]. 2012. Accessed: 13.03.2018.: http://Barma.bti-project.org/countryreports/aso/mmr Caves, R. E. 1971. ““International Corporations: The Industrial Economics of Foreign Investment”.” Economica 38.149 1-27. "China,Myanmar : CHINA to Resets Ties with MYANMAR with US $8 Billion Deals." Mena Report, November 18, 2014. Accessed May 19, 2018. http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-390583752.html?refid=easy_hf. Cohen, ‘’China’s Myanmar Problem’’, Available: https://thediplomat.com/2013/01/chinas- myanmar-problem/ Dahl, Robert A. 1971. Polyarchy; participation and opposition. New York: Yale University Dunning, John H. 1988. “The Eclectic Paradigm of International Production: A Restatement and Some Possible Extension.” Journal of International Business Studies 19.1 1-31. Dicken, P. 2011. Global Shift. Mapping the Changing Contours of the World Economy, 6th Edition. London: SAGE Publication. Dimitri Vanoverbeke and Michael Reiterer, “ASEAN’s Regional Approach to Human Rights: The Limits of the European Model?”, in Wolfgang Benedek et al. (eds.), European Yearbook on Human Rights 2014, Antwerp et al.: NWV: 185-196: 186; EU (2014) Regional Programming for Asia Multiannual Indicative Programme, 2014- 2020, http://eeas.europa.eu/archives/docs/asia/docs/rsp/regional-asia-mip-2014-2020_en.pdf p. 8. DOBBS, Richard, Heang Chor a Doan Nguyen Hansen. Myanmar’s moment: Unique opportunities, major challenges [online]. McKinsey Global Institute. 2013 [cit. 2015-11-25]. URL: http://charltonsmyanmar.com/wpcontent/uploads/2013/10/CHARLTONS-93756-v1- Myanmar_Mining_Conference_DICA_Presentation.pdf Ebbighausen, R. 2014. 60 Years of Germany Myanmar Relations. 03 09. Accessed 05 10, 2018. http://www.dw.com/en/60-years-of-germany-myanmar-relations/a-17897617. Eurostat. 2018. International Trade. 06 05. Accessed 06 10, 2018. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics- explained/index.php/International_trade_in_goods#A_surplus_for_extra- EU_trade_for_the_fifth_year_in_a_row. EUtoday: News from the EC Delegation to Cambodia, Lao PDR, Malaysia, Myanmar and Thailand. Bangkok, Thailand: Delegation of the European Commission to Cambodia, Lao PDR, Malaysia, Myanmar and Thailand. "EU/ASEAN: MINISTERS PILE PRESSURE ON BURMA." European Union., Asylum statistics [online].. 2018 [cit. 2018-03-25]. : Available: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Asylum_statistics Eleven Media, EU offer 13 million Kyat to train Myanmar Police,. [online] Nationmultimedia. 2014. [cit. 2018-03-25], Available: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/aec/EU-offers-13-billion-kyat-to-train- Myanmar-police-30227615.html Gravers, M. 2014. Burma/Myanmar - Where Now. Edited by F. Ytzen. NIAS Press. Steinberg, D. I. 2013. Burma/Myanmar, What Everyone Needs to Know. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Human Rights Watch, 2017 Report [online]. Reuters. 2017 [cit. 2018-03-25]. : Available: https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2017/country-chapters/burma Haacke, J. 2003. ASEAN’s diplomatic culture. Origins, development and prospects. London and New York: RoutledgeCurzon. Hill, J.n.c. "Levitsky and Way and Competitive Authoritarianism: Leverage, Linkage and Organisational Power." Edinburgh University Press, 2017. doi:10.3366/edinburgh/9781474408974.003.0002 "Imf Executive Board Concludes 2014 Article IV Consultation with Myanmar." States News Service, October 6, 2014. Accessed May 10, 2018. http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1- 384705462.html?refid=easy_hf. Ironman. 2018. “Here’s Why The Dot Com Bubble Began And Why It Popped. Ed. ZEVELOFF.” Julie, 10 05. "Introduction : Myanmar, Law Reform and Asian Legal Studies." Law, Society and Transition in Myanmar. doi:10.5040/9781474201650.ch-001. KATANYUU, Ruukun. Beyond Non-Interference in ASEAN: The Association's Role in Myanmar's National Reconciliation and Democratization. Asian Survey [online]. 2006, vol. 46, n. 6, p. 827-830 URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/as.2006.46.6.825 Egreteau, Renaud. Caretaking Democratization: The Military and Political Change in Myanmar. London: Hurst & Company, 2016. Engvall, Anders, and Soe Nandar Linn. "9. Myanmar Economic Update: Macro-Economy, Fiscal Reform, and Development Options." Debating Democratization in Myanmar, 2014. doi:10.1355/9789814519151-015. Kramer, T. 2011. Civil Society Gaining Ground, Opportunities for change and development in Burma. Amsterdam: Transnational Intitute. Lall, M. C. Understanding Reform in Myanmar: People and Society in the Wake of Military Rule. Chiang Mai: Silkworm Books, 2016. Linz, J. J. 2000. Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers. Moeller, J. O. 2007. “ASEAN’s Relations with the European Union: Obstacles and Opportunities.” Contemporary Southeast Asia 466-467. Lindberg, L. 2007b. The Regionalisation Process in Southeast Asia and the Economic Integration of Cambodia and Laos into ASEAN. . G teborg: G teborg University, Department of Human and Economic Geography. Levitsky, Steven & Lucan A. Way (2006): “Linkage versus Leverage. Rethinking the International Dimension of Regime Change”. Comparative Politics. Volume 38, No. 4. Ph.D. Programs in Political Science, City University of New York. Accessed 01.02.18: http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/20434008.pdf?acceptTC=true Levitsky, Steven & Lucan A. Way (2007): “Linkage, Leverage and the Post-Communist Divide”. East European Politics and Societies. Volume 21, No. 48. Sage Publications. Accessed 15.02.18: https://alexvisotzky.files.wordpress.com/2010/04/linkage-leverage-post- comm-divide.pdf Levitsky, Steven, and Lucan A. Way (2010): “Competitive authoritarianism: Hybrid regimes after the Cold War”. Cambridge University Press, New York. Manea, M. G. 2008. “uman rights and the interregional dialogue between Asia and Europe: ASEAN–EU relations and ASEM, vol. 21.” The Pacific Review 369-396. Montlake, Simon, Burma Opens for Business, Forbes [online]. In: Forbes, 2009 [cit. 05-11-18]. Available: https://www.forbes.com/global/2011/0926/focus- entrepreneur-burma-opens-modified-montlake.html#59c587985492 Morgan, A. 2015. “'A hopeful moment for civil society in Myanmar'.” New Mandala, 30 03. Mieno, Fumiharu, and Koji Kubo. "Growth Structure and Macroeconomy Under Twenty Years of Junta Regime in Myanmar." The Myanmar Economy, 2016, 51-78. doi:10.1007/978- 4-431-55735-7_3. M ller-Brandeck, Gisela, and Carolin R ger. Die Aussenpolitik Der EU. Berlin: De Gruyter Oldenbourg, 2015. Myanmar : EU and Myanmar/Burma to Negotiate an Investment Protection Agreement." Mena Report, March 21, 2014. Accessed May 19, 2018. http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-362292295.html?refid=easy_hf. Nuttin, Xavier. "EU-ASEAN Relations in the 21st Century: In Search for Common Values to Forge a Partnership." EU-ASEAN Relations in the 21st Century, 2012, 166-78. doi:10.1057/9781137007506_11. Nye, J. 1971. Peace in Parts: Integration and Conflict in Regional Organization. Boston: Little, Brown and Company. OECD. 2008. “OECD.” Benchmark Definition of Foreign Direct Investment FOURTH EDITION 2008. //www.oecd.org/daf/inv/investmentstatisticsandanalysis/40193734.pdf. Petersson, M. 2006. “Myanmar in EU–ASEAN relations.” Asia Europe Journal 4 563-581. "Readout of the Presidents Call to President Thein Sein of Burma." States News Service, October 31, 2014. Accessed March 09, 2018. http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1- 388179000.html?refid=easy_hf. Richardson, A., China’s $10 billion strategic project in Myanmar sparks local ire. [online]. Reuters. 2017 [cit. 2018-03-25]. : Available: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-silkroad-myanmar-sez/chinas-10-billion- strategic-project-in-myanmar-sparks-local-ire-idUSKBN18Z327 Rodion Ebbighausen, 60 Years of Germany-Myanmar Relations, Deutsche Welle [online]. In: . Asia Research Institute, 2009 [cit. 05-11-18]. Available z: http://www.dw.com/en/60-years-of- germany-myanmar-relations/a-17897617 Staff, Ed. 2018. 9/11 Attacks. 10 05. http://www.history.com/topics/9-11-attacks. Huwart , Jean-Yves , and Loïc Verdier. 2013. Economic Globalisation: origins and consequences. OECD: OECD. Slater, Dan (2014): “The Elements of Surprise: Assessing Burma s Double-Edged Détente”. South East Asia Research, Volume 22. No. 2. Pp. 171-182. Accessed 10.03.16: https://alumniandfriends.uchicago.edu/sites/default/files/slater_sear_burma_2014.pdf Smith, Martin, General Ne Win, The Guardian [online]. In: Forbes, 2002 [cit. 05-11-18]. Available: https://www.theguardian.com/news/2002/dec/06/guardianobituaries Steinberg, David I. (2002): “Burma: The State of Myanmar”. Georgetown University Press. Accessed 09.05.2018: https://books.google.dk/books?id=CSTuWZ0BMmMC&hl=da&source=gbs_navlinks_s Steinberg, David I. (2013): “Burma/Myanmar: What everybody needs to know” Oxford University Press. New York. 2nd ed. THU, KYAW. 2010. Myanmar Times. 29 03. Accessed 04 10, 2018. https://www.mmtimes.com/national-news/5466-political-parties-begin-registration- process.html. Teorell, Jan. "Determinants of Democratization." 2010. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511762727. Tolstrup, Jakob (2013): “When can external actors influence democratization? Leverage, linkages, and gatekeeper elites”. Democratization. Volume 20, No. 4. Pp. 716-742. Accessed 19.03.2018: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13510347.2012.666066#.Vv5XAMfUlE4 TrustLaw, Steeped in poverty, Myanmar targets natural resources. [online]. 2012. [cit. 2018- 01-10]. Accessed: http://Barma.trust.org/trustlaw/news/steeped-in- poverty-myanmartargets- natural-resources UK Gov. (2015): “Opportunities for British companies in Burma’s oil and gas sector”. UK Trade & Investment. Published January 2015. Accessed 13.04.18: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/opportunities-for-british-companies-in-burmas- oil-and-gassector UNDP (2015): “Work for human development: Brief note for countries on the 2015 Human Development Report: Myanmar”. Human Development Report 2015. Accessed 12.02.18: http://hdr.undp.org/sites/all/themes/hdr_theme/country-notes/MMR.pdf UNDP (2015a): “About Myanmar”, Human Development Report statistics. Accessed 25.02.18: http://www.mm.undp.org/content/myanmar/en/home/countryinfo.html UNHCR (2015): “2015 UNESCAP. MYANMAR: OPENING UP TO ITS TRADE AND FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT POTENTIAL [online]. Yangon, Myanmar, 2012 [. 2018-04.-25]. Accessed: http://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/TIDwp01_12.pdf UNHCR regional operations profile – Asia and the Pacific”. UNHCR – The UN Refugee Agency. Accessed 01.04.16: http://www.unhcr.org/pages/4a02d8ec6.html United Nations (2015): “Situation of human rights in Myanmar.” The General Assembly. Seventieth Session, Third Committee. Agenda item 72 (c). Promotion and protecting of human rights: Human rights situations and reports of special rapporteurs and representatives. Accessed 03.04.18: Vernon, R. 1966. “International investment and international trade in the product cycle .” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 190-207. Wilson, Trevor. "2. Debating Democratization in Myanmar." Debating Democratization in Myanmar, 2014. doi:10.1355/9789814519151-008. World Bank (2016): “Mobile Cellular subscriptions (per 100 people)”. World Bank World Development Indicators. Accessed 02.04.18: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IT.CEL.SETS.P2 World Bank (2016a): “Internet users (per 100 people)”. World Bank World Development Indicators. Accessed 02.04.18: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IT.NET.USER.P2 World Bank (2016b): “Myanmar – Country Profile”. World Bank Online Data Bank. Accessed 13.04.18: http://data.worldbank.org/country/myanmar World Bank (2016c): “GDP per capita, current US$”. The World Bank Data Bank. Development Indicators. Accessed 15.04.16: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD World Bank, The (2014): World Development Indicators. Population, total, 2014. Accessed 15.02.16: http://databank.worldbank.org/data/reports.aspx?source=2&country=MMR&series=&period = Zakaria, Fareed (1997): “The Rise of Illiberal Democracy”. The Council of Foreign Affairs Zenisek, M. 2006. Transitions towards democracy in practice . Plzen: Ales Cenek. Finer, Samuel E. 1988. The Man on Horseback: The Role of the Military in Politics. London: Westview Press. |
論文全文使用權限 |
如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信