淡江大學覺生紀念圖書館 (TKU Library)
進階搜尋


  查詢圖書館館藏目錄
系統識別號 U0002-1008201111490500
中文論文名稱 從權力平衡理論分析歐洲聯盟對俄格戰爭之因應作為
英文論文名稱 A Study on Responses of European Union toward the Russo-Georgian War under the Balance of Power Theory
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中) 歐洲研究所碩士班
系所名稱(英) Graduate Institute of European Studies
學年度 99
學期 2
出版年 100
研究生中文姓名 王朧慶
研究生英文姓名 Lung-Ching Wang
學號 696290500
學位類別 碩士
語文別 中文
口試日期 2011-06-17
論文頁數 100頁
口試委員 指導教授-鄭欽模
委員-郭秋慶
委員-魏百谷
中文關鍵字 歐洲聯盟  俄格戰爭  權力平衡理論  柔性權力 
英文關鍵字 EU  Russo-Georgian War  Balance-of-Power Theory  Soft Power 
學科別分類 學科別社會科學區域研究
中文摘要 後冷戰時期,國際間充斥著區域或國與國之間的衝突,包括種族、宗教、政治、準軍事部隊相互爭奪權力、領土、資源、獨立或尋求承認等問題。衝突的多元化對安全政策的制定造成可觀的影響,加上全球化使得國家疆界失去過去的重要性,因此建立與維持鄰近與其他地區的和平與穩定成為外交政策制定首要且必要的目標。除此之外,為因應新型態的衝突,不只需要有軍事力量的支持,也須要發展出「非軍事」工具因應之。
為此,歐洲聯盟結合長期的重建與發展協助計劃,以及短期的軍事與非軍事能力,以因應衝突發生前與發生後的狀況與情勢。「共同外交暨安全政策」與「歐洲安全暨防衛政策」的出現可謂是歐盟在此方面的努力與結果。
本文試圖以後冷戰時期的權力平衡理論瞭解俄格戰爭的發生,並解釋歐盟對俄格戰爭因應作為之意義。此外俄格戰爭的發生,為歐盟開啟了機會之窗,使歐盟能藉由歐洲安全暨防衛政策中的軍事與非軍事危機處理工具,證明其為歐洲安全環境中重要的行為者,以及其對安全事務的影響力。以權力平衡的理論而言,假使歐盟能成功地處理俄格之間的衝突,便能夠證明並提升其在歐洲安全結構中的地位與影響力,藉此制衡俄羅斯與美國,維持權力的均衡分配。
從俄格戰爭中不難發現,美國極力推動北約東擴是導致該地區緊張局勢的導火線,而歐盟在格魯吉亞問題上,表現出的態度明顯與美國有極大的出入,這是因為歐美的國際關係理念存在原則差異。冷戰後,美國憑藉其超優勢地位,於國際舞台進行單邊主義與強權政治,推行「非友即敵」的外交政策,處理國際爭端方式不是動用武力,即是實施制裁。但相反地,歐盟重視多極發展與集體安全,其強調解決爭端時,應以對話與合作替代武力制裁。另外,歐盟深知,若要擺脫美國霸權控制,就必須在國際舞臺上展現歐洲國家之外交獨立性,突顯出「歐洲區域價值」。
歐盟的歐洲安全暨防衛政策為以一系列合適的政策工具,執行危機處理任務。然而必須瞭解的是,政策所指的危機處理不只是面對政治危機的發生或軍事衝突的爆發的因應作為,更重要的是處理在歐盟的戰略空間內所發生的危機。危機處理的因應作為包括外交人員的部署、經濟政策工具、治安或行政人員的派遣、甚至於戰鬥部隊的運用,但這些政策工具通常是同時並用。以此觀點而言,面對俄格戰爭的發生,歐盟之因應作為包括衝突預防、危機處理與穩定措施等三個階段。
以歐盟對於俄格戰爭的因應作為而言,不論是在衝突預防、危機處理、或是衝突後的穩定措施等方面,雖然有詳密的計劃與快速實施的能力,然而就成效而言,卻只能算是差強人意。由此能夠瞭解國家在軍事與外交方面的力量及手段雖然不一定能夠達成安全政策所設定之目標,但仍具重要地位。經濟力量與經濟政策工具必須配合軍事力量與軍事政策工具的補足,才能夠達成既定之目標,也就是軟權力尚需要硬權力的輔助。
英文摘要 In the post-Cold War era, the international environment is filled with conflicts between regions or states. Diversification of the conflict has significant influence on the making of security policies, coupled with the globalization, the importance of state and its boundary have lost. Consequently, to construct and to maintain the peace and stability of neighbouring and other area becomes the first and necessary goal for security policies. In addition, in response to new types of conflicts, it is not enough to use military support alone to cope with, the "non-military" tools are needed as well.
To this end, the European Union combines with long-term reconstruction and development assistance programs, and short-term military and civilian capabilities to cope with the situations before and after conflicts. The emergence of "Common Foreign and Security Policy" and "European Security and Defense Policy" can be described as the EU's effort and result in this regarding field.
This article attempts to understand the occurrence of the Russo-Georgian War under the Balance-of-Power theory in the post-Cold War era, and to observe the EU’s response and its meaning. Furthermore, the Russo-Georgian War has opened a window of opportunity for EU to prove its capacity as a important security actor. In the view of Balance of Power, if the EU can successfully deal with the Russo-Georgian War, EU will be able to prove and improve its position in the European security environment, and to balance Russia and the United States, in order to maintain a balanced distribution of power.
As EU’s response toward the Russo-Georgian War, no matter in the regard of conflict prevention, crisis management, or post-conflict stabilization measures, although the meticulous planning and rapid implementation capabilities are proved, but it can only be regarded as unsatisfactory. Thus, it can be understood that the military power and diplomatic measures of state may not always attain to the goals of security policies, but its substance endure. Economic power and economic policy tools must complement the military power and military policy tools to be able to reach the established goal, which represent the soft power still need hard power’s assistance.
論文目次 第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機與目的 1
第二節 研究途徑 9
第三節 文獻探討 13
第四節 研究架構 18

第二章 後冷戰時期的權力平衡理論 21
第一節 權力平衡理論的形成與解釋 22
第二節 權力平衡理論在後冷戰時期的挑戰 34
第三節 權力平衡功能在後冷戰時期的的發展 40

第三章 俄格戰爭之過程、影響與意義 45
第一節 戰爭的緣起與過程 45
第二節 戰爭所造成的影響 55
第三節 戰爭對歐盟的意義 60

第四章 歐洲聯盟對俄格戰爭之因應作為 69
第一節 歐洲安全環境的轉變 70
第二節 歐盟安全政策的發展 74
第三節 歐盟對戰爭之作為 80

第五章 結論 87
第一節 研究發現 87
第二節 後續研究建議 90

參考文獻 91
參考文獻 參考文獻
中文專書
李正中,國際政治學上冊,(台北:三民,2009年)。
李邁先,西洋現代史,(台北:三民,2008年)。
周世雄,國際關係-權力與制度,(台北:五南,2000年)。
周繼祥,政治學,(台北:威仕曼文化,2005年)。
倪世雄,當代國際關係理論,(台北:五南,2003年)。
郭秋慶,歐洲國家的外交與安全政策,(台北:台灣國際研究學會,2006年)。
翁明賢、吳建德、江春琦編,國際關係,(台北:五南,2006年)。
張錫模,中亞安全淨評估,(台北:兩岸交流遠景基金會,2004年)。
Claude, Inis L. Jr.著,張保民譯,權力與國際關係Power and International Relations,(台北:幼獅文化,1986年)。
Holsti, K. J.著,李偉成、譚溯澄合譯,國際政治分析架構International Politics: A Framework for Analysis,(台北:幼獅,1988年)。
Hughes, Barry B.著,歐信宏、陳尚懋譯,最新國際政治新論Continuity and Change in World Politics,(台北:韋伯文化,2002年)。
Morgenthau, Hans J.著,張自學譯,國際政治學Politics Among Nations,(台北:幼獅文化,1986年)。

中文期刊
甘逸驊,「冷戰結束後的北約與國際關係理論」,問題與研究,第42卷第5期,
(2003年9,10月),頁1-17。
甘逸驊,「歐洲安全與防衛政策的軍事層面:歐盟的全球戰略地位」,問題與研
究,第45卷第5期,(2006年9、10月),頁111-136。
甘逸驊,「歐盟與美國的權力關係:「柔性平衡」的適用性」,問題與研究,第47
卷第2期,(2008年6月),頁1-19。
李玉珍,「北約東擴與俄國的反應」,問題與研究,第36卷第3期,(1997年3
月),頁100-101。
吳玉山,「顏色革命的許諾與侷限」,臺灣民主季刊,第4卷第2期,(2007年6
月),頁67-112。
鄭端耀,「國際關係攻勢與守勢現實主義理論爭辨之評析」,問題與研究,第42卷
第2期,(2003年3、4月),頁1-22。
龍舒甲,「從石油利益論九一一事件後的中亞地區與其周邊情勢」,問題與研究,
第41卷 第6期,(2002年11、12月),頁109-123。
龍舒甲,「論裡海能源與外高加索地區安全之關係」,問題與研究,第42卷第2期,
(2003年3、4月),頁95-113。
龍舒甲,「美國對格魯吉亞的外交政策」,問題與研究,第44卷第5期,(2005年
9、10月),頁85-101。

外文專書
Aldred, Ken and Martin A. Smith, Superpowers in the Post-
Cold War Era,(London: Macmillan Press Ltd., 1999).
Babali, Tuncay, Caspian Energy Diplomacy: Since the End of
the Cold-War, (Ankara: Harizan, 2006).
Baylis, John and Steve Smith, The Globalization of World
Politics, (New York: Oxford University Press, 2001).
Brzezinski, Zbigniew, The Grand Chessboard, (New York: Basic
Books, 1997).
Buzan, Barry, Ole Waever and Jaap de Wilde, Security: A New
Framework for Analysis, (Colorado, U. S.: Lynne Rienner
Publishers, Inc., 1998).
Freedman, Lawrence (ed.), Military Intervention in European
Conflicts, (Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers, 1994).
Ganzle, Stefan and Allen G. Sens, (eds.), The Changing
Politics of European Security, (New York: Palgrave
Macmillian, 2007).
Howorth, Jolyon, Security and Defence Policy in the European
Union, (New York, N. Y.: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007).
Keukeleire, Stephan and Jennifer MacNaughtan, The Foreign
Policy of the European Union, (New York: Palgrave
Macmillan, 2008).
Merlingen, Michael and Rasa Ostrauskaite, European Union
Peacebuilding and Policing, (London and New York:
Routledge, 2006)
Paul, T. V., James J. Wirtz and Michel Fortmann (eds.),
Balance of Power: Theory and Practice in the 21st Century,
(Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2004).
Rosen, Steven J., Walter S. Jones, The Logic of
International Relations, (Cambridge: Winthrop Publishers,
Inc., 1980).
Sheehan, Michael, The Balance of Power: History and Theory,
(London and New York: Routledge, 1996).
Sheehan, Michael, International Security: an analytical
survey, (London: Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc., 2005).
Streissguth, Thomas, The Transcaucasus, (San Diego,
California: Lucent Books, 2001).
Waltz, Kenneth N., Realism and International Politics, (New
York and London: Routledge, 2008).
Waltz, Kenneth N., Theory of International Politics,
(Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1979).

外文期刊
Allison, Roy, “ Russia resurgent? Moscow’s campaign to
‘coerce Georgia to peace’,” International Affairs, Vol. 84,
No. 6 (2008), pp. 1145-1171.
Boonstra, Jos, “Georgia and Russia: a short war with a long
aftermath,” Fundacion para las Relaciones Internacionales y
el Dialogo Exterior, (August 2008), pp. 1-7.
Emerson, Michael, “Post-mortem on Europe’s first war of the
21st century,” CEPS Policy Brief, No. 167, (Aug. 2008), pp.
1-7.
Haas, Ernst B., “The Balance of Power: Prescription, Concept
or Propaganda?” World Politics, Vol. 5 No. 4, (Jul., 1953),
pp. 442-477.
Haas, Ernst B., “The Balance of Power as a Guide to Policy-
Making,” The Journal of Politics, Vol. 5 No. 3, (Aug.
1953), pp. 370-398.
Huntington, Samuel, “The Lonely Superpower,” Foreign
Affairs, Vol. 78 No. 2, (March/April 1999), pp. 35-49.
Kaplan, Morton A., “Balance of Power, Bipolarity and Other
Models of International Systems,” The American Political
Science Review, Vol. 51 No. 3, (Sep. 1957), pp. 684-695.
Konig, Marietta S.,“Not Frozen but Red Hot: Conflict
Resolution in Georgia Following the Change of Government,”
OSCE Yearbook,(2006), pp. 85-96.
Pape, Robert A.,“Soft Balancing against the United States,”
International Security, Vol. 30, No. 1 (Summer 2005), pp.
7-45.
Priego, Alberto, “NATO cooperation towards South Caucasus,”
Caucasian Review of International Affairs, Vol. 2 (1),
(Winter 2008), pp. 50-57.
Wohlforth, William C., “Realism and the End of the Cold
War,” International Security, Vol. 19 No. 3, (Winter, 1994-
1995), pp. 91-129.

官方文件
Commission of the European Communities, “European
Neighbourhood Policy Country Report: Georgia,”
http://ec.europa.eu/world/enp/pdf/country/georgia_country_r
eport_2005_en.pdf, (4, November, 2010).
Council of the European Union, “General Affairs and External
Relations Extraordinary Meeting Press Release 13 August
2008,”
http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressda
ta/en/gena/102338.pdf, (8, October, 2010).
Council of the European Union, Working for Peace, Security
and Stability: Europe in the World, (Luxemberg: Office for
Official Publications of the European Communities, 2007).
European Union – EEAS (European External Action Service),
“Summary on EU-Georgia Relations,”
http://eeas.europa.eu/georgia/eu_georgia_summary/index_en.h
tm,(28, October, 2010).
Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on the
Conflict in Georgia, “Report Volume I,”
http://www.ceiig.ch/pdf/IIFFMCG_Volume_I.pdf, (21,
September, 2010).
Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on the
Conflict in Georgia, “Report Volume II,”
http://www.ceiig.ch/pdf/IIFFMCG_Volume_II.pdf, (28,
September, 2010).
Market Observatory for Energy, Report 2008: Europe’s Energy
Position Present & Future, (Luxemberg: Office for Official
Publications of the European Communities, 2008).
Ministere des Affaires etrangeres, “Declarations de
politique etrangere,”
https://pastel.diplomatie.gouv.fr/editorial/actual/ael2/bul
letin.asp?liste=20080909.html#Chapitre1, (22, Octobre,
2010).
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation,
“Statement by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the
Russian Federation,’’
http://www.mid.ru/brp_4.nsf/e78a48070f128a7b43256999005bcbb
3/ff61e0682d1506e1c3257523003f9dd6?OpenDocument, (4 ,
November, 2010).
Nichol, Jim, “Russia-Georgia Conflict in South Ossetia:
Context and Implications for U.S. Interests,” CRS Report
for Congress, Order Code RL34618, (Updated 22 Sep.
2008).
The Official Website of EUMM, “About EUMM,”
http://www.eumm.eu/en/about_eumm, (22 , October, 2010).
President of Russia Official Web Portal, “Statements
following Signing of the Treaties on Friendship,
Cooperation and Mutual Assistance with the Republics of
Abkhazia and South Ossetia,”
http://archive.kremlin.ru/eng/speeches/2008/09/17/1948_type
82912type82914type82915_206565.shtml, (15, September,
2010).

網路資料
國際線上,「歐盟今日就喬治亞局勢舉行緊急首腦會議」,
http://59.42.241.184:82/gate/big5/news.dayoo.com/world///59
997/60001/200809/01/60001_4025308.htm,(2008年9月1日)。
聯合新聞網,「布希力挺烏克蘭、喬治亞入北約」,
http://udn.com/NEWS/WORLD/WOR3/4283394.shtml,(2008年10月1
日)。
AFP, “Georgia, Russia meet for peace talks amid anger and
uncertainty,”
http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5gxNMfcM7rfdrU-
vkGWbYHCkMv80A, (15, September, 2010).
CONSILIUM – Council of the European Union, “The Common
Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP),”
http://www.consilium.europa.eu/showPage.aspx?
id=248〈=en, (4, November, 2010).
BBC News, “Ceasefire bid amid Georgia crisis,”
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7553144.stm, (15,
September, 2010).
BBC News, “Day-by-Day: Georgia-Russia crisis,”
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7551576.stm, (15,
September, 2010).
BBC News, “Georgia and Russia agree on truce,”
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7557457.stm, (15
September. 2010).
BBC News, “Georgia-Russia talks move fails,”
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7670897.stm, (15,
September, 2010).
BBC News, “Heavy Fighting in South Ossetia,”
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7546639.stm, (15,
September, 2010).
BBC News, “Q&A: Georgia conflict a year on,”
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8186356.stm, (24,
September, 2010).
BBC News, “Regions and territories: Abkhazia,”
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3261059.stm#facts, (17,
September, 2010).
BBC News, “Russia says withdrawal complete,”
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7576556.stm, (15,
September, 2010).
BBC News, “Russian jets attack Georgian town,”
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7550804.stm, (15,
September, 2010).
BBC News, “Russian tanks enter South Ossetia,”
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7548715.stm, (15,
September, 2010).
BBC News, “ Russia to keep forces at key port ,”
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7578250.stm, (4,
November, 2010).
BBC News, “Uncomfortable conclusions for Georgia,”
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8284046.stm, (2,
November, 2010).
Bloomberg, “Bush Aides Weighed Attack to Halt Russia-Georgia
War: Books,” http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?
pid=newsarchive&sid=anp.wBWKJBGY, (11, July, 2011).
DEMOKRATIZATSIYA The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization,
“Georgian Politics since the August 2008 War,”
http://www.demokratizatsiya.org/issues/summer%202009/cornel
l.html, (22, June, 2011).
EurActiv, “Russia seeks EU recognition of Georgia’s
breakaway regions,” http://www.euractiv.com/en/foreign-
affairs/russia-seeks-eu-recognition-georgia-breakaway-
regions/article-175987, (15, September, 2010).
EURASIANET, “Current Geostrategy in the South Caucasus,”
http://www.eurasianet.org/departments/insight/articles/pp01
0707.shtml, (22, June, 2011).
EUROPA – Glossary, “European Security and Defence Policy
(ESDP),”
http://europa.eu/scadplus/glossary/european_security_defenc
e_policy_en.htm, (4, November, 2010).
Global Security, “South Ossetia – Background,”
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/war/south-
ossetia-3.htm, (29, October, 2010).
Los Angeles Times, “Bush to Russia: Bullying and
intimidation are not acceptable,”
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/presidentbush/2008/08/georg
ia-russi-1.html, (11, July, 2011).
RIA Novosti, “Abkhazia, S. Ossetia may soon open embassies
in Nicaragua,”
http://en.rian.ru/world/20100603/159280095.html, (15,
September, 2010).
RIA Novosti, “U.S., Georgia start joint drills near
Tbilisi,”
http://en.rian.ru/world/20080715/114022994.html,
(11, July, 2011).
Self-Determination in Focus, “Georgia/Abkhazia,”
http://selfdetermine.irc-online.org/conflicts/abkhaz.html,
(17, September, 2010).
Self-Determination in Focus, “Tskhinvali (South Ossetia),
Georgia,” http://selfdetermine.irc-
online.org/conflicts/ossetia.html, (17, September, 2010).
STRATFOR, “Georgia and Kosovo: A Single Intertwined Crisis,”
http://www.stratfor.com/weekly/georgia_and_kosovo_si
ngle_intertwined_crisis, (6, July, 2011).
STRATFOR, “The Russo-Georgian War and the Balance of Power,”
http://www.stratfor.com/weekly/russo_georgian_war_and_balan
ce_power, (1, October, 2010).

論文使用權限
  • 同意紙本無償授權給館內讀者為學術之目的重製使用,於2016-08-15公開。
  • 不同意授權瀏覽/列印電子全文服務。


  • 若您有任何疑問,請與我們聯絡!
    圖書館: 請來電 (02)2621-5656 轉 2281 或 來信