淡江大學覺生紀念圖書館 (TKU Library)
進階搜尋


下載電子全文限經由淡江IP使用) 
系統識別號 U0002-1007201313343700
中文論文名稱 企業社會責任的保險功能-實驗法的應用
英文論文名稱 A Study on Insurance Function of Corporate Social Responsibility-Experimental Approach
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中) 財務金融學系碩士班
系所名稱(英) Department of Banking and Finance
學年度 101
學期 2
出版年 102
研究生中文姓名 張佩芬
研究生英文姓名 Pei-Feng Chang
學號 697621182
學位類別 碩士
語文別 中文
口試日期 2013-06-22
論文頁數 65頁
口試委員 指導教授-張元
共同指導教授-李命志
委員-李命志
委員-鄭婉秀
委員-李彥賢
中文關鍵字 企業社會責任  實驗法 
英文關鍵字 corporate social responsibility  insurance function for performance  experimental method 
學科別分類
中文摘要 以往關於社會責任與績效關聯性的的研究鮮少討論公司承擔社會責任「何時」對公司績效產生價值。Peloza (2006)提到企業的社會責任行為可以作為公司在經濟不景氣或負面突發事件時的保險,也就是透過日常善行所累積的好形象與好聲譽,當面對經濟不景氣或公司自身產品與營運危機時,相對於平時為從事社會責任的公司而言,消費者或投資人有可能會給予相對較少的負面評價,使得企業的社會責任行為就像是在為其財務績效購買保險一樣,這解釋了為什麼公司的社會行為沒有辦法帶來正面的帳面上財務績效時,許多公司仍然會積極從事該行為。
本論文利用實驗法,設計一個兩因子之受試者間之實驗設計,依公司從事社會責任的三種狀態-即積極從事社會責任、社會責任行為中立、違反社會責任以及公司有無遭遇負面事件-遭遇負面事件、未遭遇負面事件之一般營運狀況,設計六種公司營運狀態類型腳本,並要求受試者在特定腳本所述之模擬情境中回答有關投資該公司股票之意願。本論文的統計分析結果是,投資人對於從事社會責任的公司將有較高的持股意願;投資人對於營運狀況出現負面事件的公司,將出現較低的持股意願;給定公司負面事件發生時,相較於未從事或違反社會責任的公司而言,投資人對於積極從事社會的公司會有相較高的持股意願。
英文摘要 Past performance on social responsibility and correlation studies rarely discuss corporate social responsibility 'when' value on corporate performance. Peloza (2006) mentioned behavior of corporate social responsibility as a company in a recession or adverse emergencies insurance, which is accumulated through daily good deeds good image and good reputation, when faced with the economic downturn, or the company itself products and operating crisis, as opposed to the usual engaged in socially responsible companies, consumers or investors may be given relatively few negative comments, making the behavior of corporate social responsibility is like insurance for its financial performance , this explains why the company is no way to bring positive social behavior carrying on financial performance, many companies are still actively engaged in the behavior.
In this thesis, experimental method, the design of a two-factor between subjects experimental design, the company engaged in social responsibility by three states - that is actively engaged in social responsibility, social responsibility behavior neutrality, social responsibility, and whether the company violated encounter negative events-encounter adverse events, adverse events did not encounter the general working conditions, designed six kinds of companies operating status type script and asked the subjects mentioned in a particular simulation scenario scripts to answer questions about the willingness to invest in the company's stock. Statistical analysis of the results of this thesis is that investors are engaged in socially responsible companies will have higher holdings wishes; investors trading position of negative events for companies, there will be less willingness weak holdings; given company Negative event occurs, compared to not engage in or breach of socially responsible company, the investor for the company will be actively engaged in community with higher holdings will.
論文目次 目 錄

第一章 緒論………………………………………………………………………....1
第一節 研究動機………………………………………………………….1
第二節 研究目的………………………………………………………….5
第三節 研究流程………………………………………………………….8
第四節 研究架構............................................9
第二章 文獻回顧..........................................10
第一節 社會責任的定義與發展……………………………………….10
第二節 社會責任對公司績效的影響………………………………….12
第三節 社會責任的保險效果.................................17
第三章 研究方法.........................................25
第一節 研究設計與程序……………………………………………….25
第二節 研究樣本……………………………………………………….28
第三節 問卷題項與操弄檢核………………………………………….30
第四章 統計分析結果與討論……………………………………………………..32
第一節 敘述統計與相關係數矩陣…………………………………….32
第二節 變異數分析與迴歸分析結果………………………………….35
第三節 操弄檢核……………………………………………………….42
第五章 結論……………………………………………………………………......45
第一節 結論及管理意涵……………………………………………….45
第二節 研究限制與後續研究建議…………………………………….47
中文參考文獻……………………………………………………………………….48
英文參考文獻……………………………………………………………………….49
附錄………………………………………………………………………………….53

表 次
【表1】樣本組成之背景狀況………………………………………………………29
【表2】敘述統計量與相關係數矩陣………………………………………………34
【表3】社會責任對投資意願總分的主要效果……………………………………35
【表4】有無發生負面事件對投資意願總分的主要效果…………………………36
【表5】社會責任與有無發生負面事件對投資意願總分的交互效果……………37
【表6】變異數分析結果……………………………………………………………38
【表7】事後比較結果(Scheffe法)……………………………………………….39
【表8】投資意願總分與社會責任關聯的簡單迴歸結果…………………………40
【表9】投資意願總分與有無發生負面事件的簡單迴歸結果……………………40
【表10】投資意願總分、社會責任與有無發生負面事件的複迴歸結果…………41
【表11】投資意願總分、社會責任與有無發生負面事件以及交乘項的複迴歸
結果……………………………………………………….............41
【表12】社會責任與操弄檢核總分關聯性的簡單迴歸結果…………………….43
【表13】投資意願總分與性別、年齡及有無投資經驗的複迴歸結果………….43

圖 次
【圖1】研究架構圖...................................................8
【圖2】問卷施測之流程圖………………………………………………………….28
參考文獻 中文參考文獻

池祥麟、林怡君(2007),企業社會績效與企業財務績效關聯性之分析—以道瓊STOXX永續性指數為例,國立台北大學合作經濟學系碩士論文。

沈中華 、張元(2008),企業的社會責任行為可以改善財務績效嗎?-以英國FTSE社會責任指數為例,經濟論文,第36卷第3期,頁339-385。

沈中華、張元、王宗政(2010),新聞曝光可以增進企業社會責任對財務績效的影響嗎?-台灣的實證研究,臺灣經濟學會2010年年會,國立臺灣大學。

紀婉儀(2009),企業倫理與企業社會責任對組織績效影響之研究,逢甲大學企業管理學研究所碩士論文。

邱毅 (2009),現代危機管理,台北市偉碩文化,第四版。

洪春吉、蔡佩君(1974),組織文化與企業社會責任之關係─以金融產業、生技產業實證比較,臺灣銀行季刊,第63卷第1期,頁70-99。

郭方昇(2001),企業社會責任對企業財務績效與投資組合績效之影響性分析,中原大學企業管理學系碩士論文。

涂秋汝(2007),定期海運業企業社會責任、企業形象與組織績效之關係,國立成功大學交通管理科學系碩士班。

陳木聯 (2002),電業服務品質、社會責任、企業形象與顧客滿意度之相關性研究,南華大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。

陳宜民、鍾道詮(2002),「醫師的社會責任養成教育之我見」,應用倫理研究通訊,,第二十一卷。

鄧美貞、王琬青(2012),企業社會責任與財務績效:以經營效率為中介效果,朝陽商管評論,第11卷第2期,頁77-104。

劉昱菁(2009),台灣企業社會責任得獎公司之財務績效探討,國立成功大學財務金融研究所碩士在職專班論文。

盧建成(2006),企業社會責任調查暨實證性研究-以台灣資訊產業為例,國立高雄大學經濟管理研究所碩士論文。


英文參考文獻

Alexander, G. and Buchholz, A. (1982) “Exploringthe Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance and Employer Attractiveness”, Business Society, Vol. 41, No. 3, Page 292-318.

Aupperle, K. E., Carroll, A.B., and J. D. Hatfield. (1985).“Board members, corporate social responsiveness and profitability: Are tradeoffs necessary?”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 8, Page 353-357.

Barnett, L. and Robert M. “Corporate social responsibility in a comparative perspective”, Vol.6, Page 1-12.

Becchetti, L., Ciciretti, R. and Hasan, I. (2007) “Corporate social responsibility and shareholder's value: an event study analysis”, Lally School of Management, Page 50.

Bhattacharya, C. B., and Sankar, S. (2004) “The effect of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) initiatives on consumers’ identification with companies”, African Journal of Business Management, Vol. 5(5), Page 1642-1649.

Bowen, E. G. (1953) “Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a Definitional Construct”, Page 269-270.

Bowman, E. H. and Haire, M. (1975) “Corporate Social Responsibility Evolution of a Definitional Construct”, Business Society, Vol. 38, No. 3, Page 268-295.

Brammer, S., Millington, A. and Rayton, B. (2005) “Corporate Social Performance and Stock Returns: UK Evidence from Disaggregate Measures”, Corresponding author. Faculty of Finance, Cass Business School, Page 20.

Brockett, P. L., and Golany, B. (1996) “Using Rank Statistics for Determining Programmatic Efficiency Differences in Data Envelopment Analysis”, Management Science, Vol.42, No.3, Page 466-472.

Carhart, M. (1997) “On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance”, The Journal of Finance, Vol.52, No.1, Page 57-82.
Carroll, B. (1979) “A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance”,

Cornell, B., and Alan C. (1987) “Corporate Stakeholders and Corporate Finance”, Page 1-20.

Goodman, D. W., and Marcus, P. M. (1986) “Victims and Shareholders: The Dilemmas of Presenting Corporate Policy During A Crisis”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 34, No. 2, Page 281-305.

Friedman, M. (1970) “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits”, The New York Times Magazine, Page 1-21.

Griffin, J. and Mahon, F. (1997)‎ “The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate Twenty-Five Years of Incomparable Research”, Business Society, Vol. 36, No. 1, Page 5-31.

Hammond, C. S., (1955) “A Correlation of Reaction Rates”, Vol. 77, Page 334-338.

Klaas, W. (1990) “Managerial Decision Making About Employee Discipline: A policy-capturing approach”, Vol. 43, No. 1, Page 117–134.

Lerner, L. D., and G. D. Fryxell (1988) “An empirical study of the predictors of corporate social performance: a multi-dimensional analysis”, Journal of Business Ethics (JBE), Vol. 7, Page 951-959.

Margolis, J. D.,and Walsh, J. P. (2003) “Managing corporate social responsibility in action:Talking, Doing and measuring”, Page 77-78.

Morf, D.A., Michael G.S.,and Scott J.V. (1999).“Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance, Academy of Management ”, Journal, Vol. 31,
Page 854-872.

Moskowitz, M. (1972) “Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance”, The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 27, No. 1, Page 42-56.

Newgren, R. (1985) “The Relationship between Social and Financial Performance Repainting a Portrait”, Business Society, Vol. 38, No. 1, Page 109-125.

Orlitzky, M., and Frank.L., (2003) “Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-analysis”, Organization Studies, Vol.24, No.3, Page 403–441.

Parker, R. and Eibert, H. (1975) “The Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profitability: The Case of Royal Dutch Shell Plc”, Corporate Reputation Review, Vol. 14, No. 4, Page 249-261.

Peloza, J. (2006) “The Marketing of Employee Volunteerism”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 64(4), Page 357-379.

Preston, E., and D. P. O'Bannon. (1997) “The corporate social-financial performance relationship”, Business and Society, Vol. 36, No. 4, Page 419-429.

Ronald, M., and Hayibor, S. and Bradley R. (1999)‎ “The relationship between social and financial performance”, Business and Society, Vol. 38, No. 1, Page 109-130.

Rubin, B. and Rosenbaum, P. R. (1983, 1985a, 1985b)“Using Propensity Scores to Help Design Observational Studies: Application to the Tobacco Litigation”, Health Services & Outcomes Research Methodology, Vol. 2, Page 169–188.

Rubin, Z. (1973) “The Use of Matched Sampling and Regression Adjustment to Remove Bias in Observational Studies”, International Biometric Society, Vol. 29, No. 1, Page 185-203.

Sherer, P. D.,and Schwab, D. P.,and Hememan, H. C.(1987).“Managerial salary-raise decision: A Policy-capturing approach.”Personnel Psychology, Vol. 77, Page 27-38.

Steiner, R. (1980) “Business, government, and society: A managerial perspective”, Business and society, Vol. 3, No. 1, Page 583-610.

Sundgren, M. (1998) “Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance”, The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 31, No. 4, Page 854-872.
Tsoutsoura, A. (2004) “Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance”, Working Paper Series, Vol. 3, No. 1, Page 1-21.

Turban, D.B. and Greening, D.W.(1997) “Corporate Social Perforniance and Attractiveness as an Employer to Different Job Seeking Populations”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 28, Page 243-253.

Ullmann, J. D., (1985) “Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-analysis”, Organization Studies, Page 403–441.

Vance, D. E. (1975) “Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance”, Page 1-3.

Waddock, A., and Graves, B. (1997) “The Corporate Social Performance-Financial Performance Link”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18, No. 4, Page 303–319.

Wokutch, R.E. and Spencer, B.A. (1987) “The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: Understanding and measuring economic impacts of corporate social performance”, Page 70

Wood, D. J. (1991) “Corporate Social Performance Revisited”, Academy of Management, Vol. 16, No. 4, Page 691-718.
論文使用權限
  • 同意紙本無償授權給館內讀者為學術之目的重製使用,於2013-07-23公開。
  • 同意授權瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2013-07-23起公開。


  • 若您有任何疑問,請與我們聯絡!
    圖書館: 請來電 (02)2621-5656 轉 2281 或 來信