淡江大學覺生紀念圖書館 (TKU Library)
進階搜尋


下載電子全文限經由淡江IP使用) 
系統識別號 U0002-0901201219405700
中文論文名稱 銀行業的環境揭露與綠色信貸-以中國為例
英文論文名稱 Environmental Disclosure and Green Credit-Evidence from China
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中) 會計學系碩士在職專班
系所名稱(英) Department of Accounting
學年度 100
學期 1
出版年 101
研究生中文姓名 黃馨誼
研究生英文姓名 Hsin-Yi Huang
學號 798600317
學位類別 碩士
語文別 中文
口試日期 2012-01-06
論文頁數 57頁
口試委員 指導教授-郭樂平
委員-李光廷
委員-徐志順
委員-郭樂平
中文關鍵字 銀行業  環境揭露  綠色信貸  清潔能源產業  污染產業 
英文關鍵字 Banking  Environmental disclosure  Green credit  Clean energy industry  Dirty industry 
學科別分類 學科別社會科學商學
中文摘要 本文的主要研究目的是檢視銀行的環境揭露與清潔能源產業和污染產業的綠色信貸之間關聯性。
本研究蒐集2009和2010中國銀行業的企業社會責任報告書和年報,採用獨立樣本t檢定之統計推論方法進行分析。
結果顯示,在綠色信貸佔總負債比重之結果發現,清潔能源產業大於污染產業,但未達統計上的顯著水準。在分析清潔能源產業和污染產業的國有與私有企業在獲得樣本銀行的綠色信貸佔總負債比重上,發現他們有一個共同的現象,不論是清潔能源產業還是污染產業的私有企業所獲得的綠色信貸金額較多,意味著其背後可能存在某些利益(例如銀行獲得較高的利率)。
本研究管理意涵:樣本銀行的管理者可能為了本身的經營績效,願意把綠色信貸的資金給私有企業較多,以獲得較高的利率,來換取承擔私有企業比國有企業更可能倒債或倒閉之風險,這樣的結果就是一個高風險高報酬呈現。
本研究實證分析中國政府利用金融手段來管制產業的環境治理問題,這樣的研究是過去的研究較少探討的議題,將有助建立綠色信貸相關的實證性研究領域文獻。
英文摘要 Purpose: This study intends to examine the relevance between the environmental disclosure of banks and green credit of clean energy industry and dirty industry.
Design/methodology/approach:This study collects corporate social responsibility report and annual report of the banking industry in China of 2009 and 2010 and conducts the analysis by applying statistical inference method of independent sample t test.
Findings: It is found in the proportion of the green credit to total debt that clean energy industry is higher than that of dirty industry, but has not reached the statistically significant level. In the analysis of state-owned (SOEs) and private-owned (POEs) enterprises in clean energy industry and dirty industry in obtaining the proportion of the sample green credit bank to the total debt, it was discovered that they have a common phenomenon, both private-owned enterprise in clean energy industry and dirty industry obtain more green credit amount, which means that there may be some benefit behind (for example banks get a higher interest rate).
Practical implications: Sample bank managers are likely to put more green credit funds to private-owned enterprises for their performance, in order to get a higher interest rate, to assume more risks than state-owned enterprises in debt or bankruptcy. The result is as the manifestation of high risk and high returns.
Originality/value: The study conducts an empirical analysis to the Chinese government by the financial means to control industry environmental governance, which is less discussed in the past and will help to establish the empirical research literature related to green credit.
論文目次 目錄
中文摘要.................................................i
英文摘要................................................ii
目錄....................................................iv
表目錄..................................................vi
圖目錄.................................................vii

第一章 緒論.............................................1
第一節 研究背景與動機...................................1
第二節 研究目的.........................................2
第三節 研究限制.........................................3
第四節 論文架構.........................................4
第二章 文獻探討.........................................5
第一節 綠色信貸政策.....................................5
第二節 赤道原則.........................................7
第三節 中國綠色信貸政策發展............................16
第四節 國際上綠色信貸政策發展..........................19
第五節 環境揭露........................................26
第三章 研究方法........................................31
第一節 研究架構........................................31
第二節 研究假說........................................32
第四節 內容分析法......................................33
第四章 研究結果及分析..................................39
第一節 敘述性統計分析..............................39
第二節 相關分析....................................41
第二節 差異性分析......................................42
第五章 研究結果論與建議................................46
第一節 研究結論....................................46
第二節 未來的研究建議..............................48
參考文獻................................................49

表目錄

表 2-1 銀行環境資訊揭露評分表...........................9
表 4-1 敘述性統計......................................12
表 4-2 相關係數........................................13
表 4-3 綠色信貸之差異分析..............................15
表 4-4 清潔能源產業的綠色信貸之差異分析................16
表 4-5 污染產業的綠色信貸之差異分析....................17

圖目錄

圖1 研究流程架構圖................................. ....4
圖2 研究架構圖..................................... ...10
圖3 銀行執行綠色信貸的趨勢圖...................... ....14
圖4 清潔能源產業各行業取得綠色信貸之比例...............16
圖5 污染產業各行業取得綠色信貸之比例...................18
參考文獻 參考文獻
一、中文部份
1.于曉剛,2009,中國銀行業環境記錄,雲南出版集團
2.孔令紅、智慧,2009,NGO參與和推動綠色金融的啟迪意義,經濟
研究月刊,第十一期:125-126
3.王帥,2011,國內商業銀行綠色信貸分析,中國市場,第二十六
期:64-66
4.古小東,2010,綠色信貸的國際經驗與啟示,金融與經濟,第七
期:19-21
5.左瑞娟,2010,我國商業銀行發展綠色信貸的SWOT分析,金融發展
研究,第七期:69-72
6.左瑞娟、郭凱軍,2010,我國商業銀行發展綠色信貸的SWOT分析,金融發展研究,第七期:69-72
7.何德旭、張雪蘭,2007,對我國商業銀行推行綠色信貸若干問題的思考,上海金融,第十二期:4-9
8.李東衛,2009,綠色信貸:基於赤道原則顯現的缺陷及矯正,環境經濟,第一期:41-46
9.李東衛,2011,銀行業推行綠色信貸的困境與對策,環境經濟,第五期:48-51
10.阮芳,2011,論綠色信貸立法化研究-以銀行業監管為視角,經濟與法,第二期:95
11.周倪波,2010,綠色信貸促進經濟增長方式轉型,環境保護,第十二期:40-41
12.林可全、呂堅明,2010,商業銀行綠色信貸的國際比較研究及對我國的啟示,經濟與管理,第四期:51-53
13.林醇,2010,低碳銀行業的貼金標簽,環境經濟,第七期:10-12
14.俞海,2011,中國“十二五”綠色發展路線圖,環境保護部环境與經濟政策研究中心
15.胡乃武、曹大偉,2011,綠色信貸與商業銀行環境風險管理,經濟問題,第三期:203-107
16.高亞寧,2010,赤道原則及對我國綠色信貸的啟示,產權導刊,第十期:41-43
17.婁志捷,2010,鞏固推進綠色信貸-基於商業銀行長期發展角度的思考,經濟論談,第七期:120
18.郭麗,2009,商業銀行的企業社會責任與可持續發戰略關係探析,南方金融,第八期:67-68
19.陳柳欽,2010,國內外綠色信貸的實踐路徑,環境經濟,第十二期:26-28
20.陳柳欽,2010,國內外綠色信貸發展動態分析,決策資詢通訊,第六期:4-5
21.陳柳欽,2010,國內外綠色信貸發展動態分析,經濟研究,第六期:1-10
22.陳海若,2010,綠色信貸研究綜述與展望,金融理論與實踐,第八期:90-93
23.陽露昭、姜淵,2009,論我國綠色信貸法律制度的構建,江西財經大學學報,第四期:112-116
24.翟豐,2010,淺析商業銀行的社會責任,西部財會,第六期:50-52
25.銀聯信,2010,借鑒國際經驗完善綠色信貸,金融博覽,第五期:6-7
26.劉杰,2011,工信部首次提出“十二五”减碳目標,中國聯合商報
27.潭小波、符森,2010,產業結構調整背景下推行綠色信貸政策的思考,經濟研究導刊,第二十九期:94-97
28.關霖,2010,綠色信貸政策的淵源,環境教育,第四期:49-52
二、英文部份
1.Amalric,F,2005,The Equator Principles: a step towards sustainability?, Working Paper Series,Center for Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability (CCRS),University of Zurich, Zurich,1-23.
2.Argandoña,A,2009,Can Corporate Social Responsibility help us understand the credit crisis?" (Working Paper, IESE Business School, University of Navarra), Available:
3.Ashforth,B.E.and Gibbs,B.W,1990,The double-edge of organizational legitimation,Organization Science,1(2), 177-94.
4.BankTrack,2005,Unproven Equator Principles: A BankTrack Statement, BankTrack, Utrecht.
5.BankTrack,2006a,Statement on the New Version of the Equator Principles, BankTrack,Utrecht.
6.BankTrack,2006b,The Do's and Don'ts of Sustainable Banking: A BankTrack Manual,BankTrack, Utrecht.
7.Callado-Muñoz,F.J.and Utrero-Gonzalez,N,2010,Does It Pay to Be Socially Responsible? Evidence from Spain's Retail Banking Sector, Forthcoming in European Financial Management.
8.Cohen,J,1960,A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20,37− 46.
9.Collevecchio Declaration ,2003, available at: www.banktrack.org/doc/File/BankTrack%20publications/Collevecchio%20Declaration/030401%20Collevecchio%20Declaration.pdf.
10.Cormier,D.and Magnan,M,2003,Environmental reporting management: a European perspective. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 22,43–62.
11.Decker,S.and Sale,C,2009,An Analysis of Corporate Social Responsibility, Trust and Reputation in the Banking Profession.In Professionals′ Perspectives of Corporate Social Responsibility, eds. S. O. Idowu and W. Leal Filho, 135-156.
12.Deegan,C.and Gordon,B,1996,A study of the environmental disclosure practices of Australian corporations. Accounting and Business Research 26(3),187–199.
13.Dennis,M.P,1992,Intra‐industry environmental disclosures in response to the Alaskan oil spill. Accounting, Organizations and Society 17(5),471–475.
14.Dennis,M.P,1995,Variability in social disclosure: a legitimacy based analysis. Advances in Public Interest Accounting 6,273–285.
15.Gray,R.,Kouhy,R.,and Lavers,S,1995,Corporate social and environmental reporting: a review of the literatire and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting Auditing and Accountability Journal 8(2),47–77.
16.Guthrie,J.and Parker,L,1989,Corporate social reporting: a rebuttal of legitimacy theory. Accounting and Business Research 19(76),343–352.
17.Haney,W.,Russell,M.,Gulek,C., and Fierros,E,1998,Drawing on education: Using student drawings to promote middle school improvement. Schools in the Middle, 7(3),38− 43.
18.Haney,W.,Russell,M.,Gulek,C.and Fierros,E,1998,Drawing on education: Using student drawings to promote middle school improvement. Schools in the Middle,7(3), 38− 43.
19.Hoepner,A.and Wilson,J,forthcoming, Social,Environmental, Ethical and Trust (SEET) Issures in Banking :An Overview, in James Barth, Clas Wihlborg, Chen Lin,(Eds), International Research Handbook for Banking and Governance, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
20.Holsti,O.R,1969,Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
http://www.iese.edu/research/pdfs/DI-0790-E.pdf.
http://www.unepfi.org/about/background/index.html.
21.Jeucken,M,2001,Sustainable Finance and Banking: The Financial Sector and the Future of the Planet, The Earth scan Publication Ltd,1,318.
22.Kelly,M.and Huhtala,A,2001,The role of the United Nations Environment Programme and the financial services sector,In Sustainable Banking,The Greening of Finance, eds. Bouma J.J, Jeucken M and Klinkers L,390-400.
23.Kerlinger,F.N,1986,Foundations of behavioral research, 3rd edition. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, Winston.
24.Krippendorff,K,1980,Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
25.Kuo, L., Yeh, C-C and Yu, H-C, 2011, Disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management-Evidence from China, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. (Accepted, Forthcoming)
26.Lobe,2003,Citigroup yields to pressure from environmentalists, available at: www.globalpolicy.org/socecon/tncs/2003/0417citigroup.htm.
27.Missbach,A,2004,The Equator Principles: drawing the line for socially responsible banks? An interim review from an NGO perspective, Society for International Development,47(3), 78-84.
28.Nelthrope,T,2003,Principled finance?, available at: www.equator-principles.com/pfm.shtml.
29.Nelthrope,T,2003,Principled finance?, available at: www.equator-principles.com/pfm.shtml.
30.OʼSullivan,N.and OʼDwyer,B,2009, Stakeholder perspectives on a financial sector legitimation process: The case of NGOs and the Equator Principles, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal,22(4),553-587.
31.Peters,H,2003,Sustainable Development and the Role of the Financial World,In The World Summit on Sustainable Development, eds. L. Hens and B. Nath,241-274.
32.Robert,W.I.and Katherine,B.F,1980,Environmental performance and corporate disclosure. Journal of Accounting Research 18,612–622.
33.Scholtens,B,2009,Corporate Social Responsibility in the International Banking Industry." Journal of Business Ethics, 86(2),159-175.
34.Stemler,S,2011,An overview of content analysis,Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation,7(17).
35.Stephanou,C,2010,Rethinking market discipline in banking: lessons from the financial crisis,World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 5227.
36.Stern,N,2006,The Economics of Climate Change,The Stern Review,Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.Stigler,J.W.,Gonzales,P.,Kawanaka,T.,Knoll,S.and Serrano, A,1999.
38.Suchman,M.C,1995,Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches,The Academy of Management Review, 20(3),571-610.
The TIMSS Videotape Classroom Study: Methods and Findings from an Exploratory Research Project on Eighth-Grade Mathematics Instruction in Germany, Japan, and the United States. U.S. Department of Education National Center for Educational Statistics: NCES 99-074.Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
39.U.S. General Accounting Office,1996,Content Analysis: A Methodology for Structuring and Analyzing Written Material. GAO/PEMD-10.3.1. Washington, D.C. (This book can be ordered free from the GAO).
40.UNEP FI,1997,UNEP Statement by Financial Institutions on the Environment & Sustainable Development,(UNEP FI), Available:http://www.unepfi.org/fileadmin/statements/fi/fi_statement_en.pdf.
41.UNEP FI,2010b,Background,(UNEP FI), Available:
42.Wackernagel,M.,Schulz,N.B.,Deumling,D.,Callejas Linares, A.,Jenkins,M., Kapos,V.,Monfreda,C.,Loh,J.,Myers,N., Norgaard,R., and Randers,J,2002,Tracking the ecological overshoot of the human economy,Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,99(14), 9266-9271.
43.Watchman,P,2006, Banks,business and human rights, available at: www.equatorprinciples.com/documents/IB_02.2006_Paul%20Watchman.pdf.
44.Weber,R.P,1990, Basic Content Analysis, 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA.
45.Weitzner,D.and Darroch,J,2009,Why moral failures precede financial crises,Critical Perspectives on International Business, 5(1/2), 6-13.
46.Wheelock,A.,Haney,W.and Bebell,D,2000,What can student drawings tell us about high-stakes testing in Massachusetts? TCRecord.org. Available: http://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentID=10634.
47.Wiseman,J,1982,An evaluation of environmental disclosures made in corporate annual reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society 7(1),53–63.
48.Wright,C.and Rwabizambuga,A,2006,Institutional Pressures, Corporate Reputation,and Voluntary Codes of Conduct: An Examination of Equator Principles." Business & Society Review, 111(1),89-117.
49.Wright,C.and Rwabizambuga,A,2006,Institutional pressures, corporate reputation, and voluntary codes of conduct: an examination of the Equator Principles, Business and Society Review, 111(1), 89-117.
50.Zeghal,D.and Ahmed,S,1990,Comparison of social responsibility information disclosure media by Canadian firms. Accounting, Auditing, and Accountability Journal 3(1),38–53.
論文使用權限
  • 同意紙本無償授權給館內讀者為學術之目的重製使用,於2012-01-11公開。
  • 同意授權瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2017-01-11起公開。


  • 若您有任何疑問,請與我們聯絡!
    圖書館: 請來電 (02)2621-5656 轉 2281 或 來信