§ 瀏覽學位論文書目資料
  
系統識別號 U0002-0807201400295100
DOI 10.6846/TKU.2014.00210
論文名稱(中文) 產品組合策略形成與核心能力之關聯研究-設計取向 VS 浮現取向
論文名稱(英文) The relatedness study between the strategy formation of product portfolio and core competence- Design approach vs. Emergency approach.
第三語言論文名稱
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中文) 國際商學碩士在職專班
系所名稱(英文) Executive Master's Program of Business Administration (EMBA) in International Commerce
外國學位學校名稱
外國學位學院名稱
外國學位研究所名稱
學年度 102
學期 2
出版年 103
研究生(中文) 吳昀潔
研究生(英文) Yun-Jie Wu
學號 701520388
學位類別 碩士
語言別 繁體中文
第二語言別
口試日期 2014-06-23
論文頁數 56頁
口試委員 指導教授 - 黃哲盛
委員 - 郭國泰
委員 - 歐素華
關鍵字(中) 產品組合
核心能力
策略形成
關鍵字(英) Product portfolio
Core competence
Strategy formation
第三語言關鍵字
學科別分類
中文摘要
隨著科技產業變遷,電子產品生命週期快速縮短,尤其在消費性產品上產品技術規格不斷在創新下,不論企業規模大小,都會面對從草創期、成長期到穩定期,最後可能還會面臨衰退期,無論是環境的改變或技術的變革,如果企業能提早應變市場變化,就有可能再找出下一波成長的機會,而有效評估公司發展策略,拓展公司業務組合,便有機會突破公司瓶頸。

    產品開發策略在整個企業的操作和執行上有很多的變數,企業透過產品組合策略來建議公司未來新產品開發方向,經理人依外在環境的變化不斷的調適策略,使其產品組合拓展方式更具完整性、延續性以及創新性,使企業在評估產品組合時能更精確切中市場需求,同時更有效利用公司資源和發揮企業核心能力。

    本研究從產品組合與核心能力互動發展的關聯性探討中,以實證角度證實企的策略形成方式是設計取向或浮現取向,而且,也從產品組合核與心能力的動態關聯中發現核心能力較僵固的廠商其策略形成方式多為設計取向,反之則為浮現取向。
英文摘要
With the advancement of the technology industry, life cycles of electronic products have been shortened rapidly. It is especially true with consumer products. As product technologies and specs have been innovated continuously, enterprises, no matter the scale, sooner or later would have to face an initial stage, a growing stage, a stable stage, and probably a decline stage eventually. No matter in the aspect of change in environment or technology, if an enterprise can response to the market change in advance, it is likely that the enterprise can find another chance for growth. And efficiently evaluate development strategies and expanding business portfolios can help a company to break its current bottleneck.

In the aspects of overall operations and executions of enterprises, there can be a lot of uncertainty and changes in product development strategies. Enterprises try to suggest directions for new product development based on product portfolio strategies. Managers keep on adjusting their strategies according to changes in external environments, so that their expansion of product portfolios can be more complete, sustainable, and innovative. This way, when their enterprises evaluate product portfolios, the change to meet market demands would be higher. In the meantime, companies’ resources can be used more efficiently and their core competence can be well applied.

This study explored the relationship of interactive development between product portfolios and core competence and proved an enterprise’s strategy formation approach is either the design approach or the emergency approach from the empirical perspective. Also, through the dynamic relationship between product portfolios and core competence, this study found that the strategy formation approach of companies with core rigidity is usually the design approach, while that of others is the emergency approach.
第三語言摘要
論文目次
第一章	緒論...................	1
1.1 研究背景與動機.............	1
1.2 研究目的與問題..............2
1.3 研究範圍....................3
1.4 研究流程....................4
第二章	文獻探討................5
2.1 產品組合....................5
2.2 核心能力....................9
2.3策略形成....................16
第三章	研究方法...............19
3.1 質性研究...................19
3.2 研究設計...................22
3.3 個案選擇...................23
第四章	研究結果與分析.........25
4.1 個案一:A科技股份有限公司..25
4.2 個案二:B科技股份有限公司..37
第五章	研究結論與建議.........48
5.1 研究結論...................48
5.2 研究貢獻...................50
5.3 研究限制...................51
5.4 研究建議...................51
參考文獻.......................52


表2-1甲公司產品組合的廣度與產品線長度......6
表2-2 國內外學者核心能力的定義.............9
表2-3 組織能力的功能性區分................12
表4-1 A個案公司簡介.......................25
表4-2 A個案公司受訪者資料.................26
表4-3 A個案公司產品組合策略形成方式.......29
表4-4 A個案公司2004~2012營業收入..........33
表4-5 B個案公司簡介.......................37
表4-6 B個案公司受訪者資料.................38
表4-7 B個案公司之產品組合策略形成方式.....40

圖 1-1 研究流程圖..........................4
圖 2-1 麥克波特的價值鏈...................13
圖 4-1 手機演變歷程.......................27
圖 4-2 全球衛星導航市場規模...............42
參考文獻
中文部分:
1.王旭統(2002),「型塑新行政文化之方向與策略」,台灣大學國家發展研究所碩士論文。
2.王旭統(2003),「公務人員核心職能之形成途徑與評選面向」,公務人員月刊,第81期。
3.王銘新 (2011),「國藥廠核心能力與成長軌跡之研究」,國立臺灣大學國際企業管理組碩士論文。
4.司徒達賢 (2001),「策略管理個案集」,貝塔/智勝,2000-10-01 出版 。
5.何連國,(1982),「專利法規及實務」,自行出版。
6.余文生 (2011),「企業經營藍海策略之個案研究」,國立臺灣科技大學理研究所碩士論文。
7.林怡君 (2011),「高階領導者的策略領導對企業構學習型組織的影響」,國立台北大學企業研究所碩士論文。
8.林品妤 (2012),「新產品開發的協同合作之研究」清雲科技大學經營管理研究所碩士論文。
9.孫本初 (2002),「知識管理與公務人力資源發展」,知識管理與政府績效學術研討會,世新大學行政管理學系、公務人力發展中心主辦。
10.徐世同綿譯 (2008) ,「策略品牌管理(3版)」,台北市:華泰文化事業股份有限公。
11.徐裕敏 (2012),「IPTV競爭策略研究-以中華電信MOD為例」,雲林科技大學商管專業學院碩士論文。
12.張育寧 (2012),「產品多角化、組織資源與創新關係之研究」,國立東華大學國際企業學系碩士論文。
13.張偲怡 (2006),「中小企業成功因素探討-鴻茂工業之個案研究」,雲林科技大學企業管理系碩士論文。
14.陳基財 (1994),「產品組合策略之研究-以電信總局為例」,國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
15.陳彩繁 (1995),「策略雄心與資源槓桿運用之研究─以長谷公司為例」,國立中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
16.陳斐 (2009),「深度訪談的障礙及其引導原則、對策」,新聞愛好者,2009卷2B 期
17.賀力行、林少斌 (2003),「從公司治理角度看尊重利害關係人的權益」,中華公司治理協會,檢索日期2011年2月25日,取自http://www.cga.org.tw/。
18.潘淑滿 (2003) ,「質性研究 : 理論與應用」,台北,心理出版。
19.蔡文河 (2010),「小型電子公司持續成長模式的研究」,國立臺灣大學國際企業管理組碩士論文。
20.蔡志青 (2011),「企業以既有產品尋求成長機會之決策發展歷程—以文件管理軟體為例」,國立台北大學企業研究所碩士論文。

網站部份:
1.中時電子報 http://www.chinatimes.com
2.經理人 http://www.managertoday.com.tw
3.mobile01網站 http://www.mobile01.com
4.MBA 智庫百科 http://wiki.mbalib.com
5.Yahoo 智識 https://tw.knowledge.yahoo.com

英文部分:
1.Aaker, D. A. (1991), Managing Brand Equity, New York, NY: The Free Press.
2.Alfred Chandler (1962),Strategy and Structure
3.Barney, J.B. (1991), “Firm resources and sustained competitive ad-vantage,” Journal of Management..
4.Bearden, William O, Thomas N. Ingram and Raymond W. LaForge (2001), Marketing:Principles & Perspectives,3rd ed., Von Hoffmann Press.Business Review, 68(3), pp. 79–91
5.Chan, Kensinger, Keown, Martin .(1997), “ Do strategic alliance create value?” Journal of Financial Economics , 46(2), pp. 199-221.
6.Charles W. Lamb, Joseph F. Hair, Carl McDaniel, (2003), Essentials of Marketing, 3e.
7.Collis &; Montgomery.( 1995),"Competing on Resource: Strategy in The 1990s", Harvard Business Review, 73(4), pp.118-12
8.David Teece. (1982), Towards and Economic Theory of the Multiproduct Firm. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 
9.Dorothy Leonard-Barton. (1995), Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation. Harvard Business School Press.
10.Guiltinan, Joseph P.,( 1993), A Strategic Framework for Assessing Product Line Additions, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 10: 136-147
11.Henry Mintzberg (1979), The structure of Organization ( Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prenttice - Hall)
12.Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hoskisson, R. E. (1999), Strategic management: Competitiveness and globalization.
13.Jauch & Glueck. (1989), Strategic Management and Business Policy, 5 th Edition, McGraw-Hill.
14.Johnson and Jones(1957), “How to Organize for New Product,”Harvard Business Review,vol35.
15.Khalid Hafeez,Yan Bing Zhang (2002). Naila Malak.Determing key capabilities of a firm using analytic hierarchy process.International Journal of production economics, 76.
16.Koler, Philip (2002), Marketing Management, 11th ed., Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs,NJ.
17.Kotler, Philip (2003), Marketing Management, 11th ed., Prentice Hall.
18.Kotler, Philip and Gary Armstrong (1996), Principles of Marketing, Published by Prentice-Hall International
19.Kotler, Philip, Siew Meng L, Swee Hoon Ang and Chin Tiong Ta (1996), Marketing management: an Asian perspective, Singapore: Prentice Hall Press.
20.Mahen Tampoe (1994), Exploiting The Core Competence Of Your Organization, Long Rang Planning, 27, 4, 66-77.
21.Michael Porter (1985),  Porter, Michael E. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York.: Simon and Schuster. Retrieved 9 September 2013.
22.Minichiello et al. (1995),In-Depth Interviewing: Principles, Techniques, Analysis (2nd Ed.) South Melbourne: Longman
23.Prahalad, CK and G. Hamel (1990), 'The core competence of the corporation', Harvard
24.Quelch, John A. and David Kenny (1994), Extend Profits, Not Product Lines. Harvard Business Review, 72(5), 153-160.
25.Reddy, S. K. Susan L. H. and Subodh B. (1994),  To Extend o Not to Extend:Success Determinants of Line Extensions. Journal of Marketing Research, 31(May), 243-262.
26.Robert M. Grant (2009), Contemporary Strategy Analysis 6e 
27.Robert M. Grant, Contemporary Strategy Analysis, Copyright( 2013), Publish by John Willey & Sons Ltd.
28.Schendel, D, Hofer, C, (1979),  Strategic management:
29.Schramm. (1971), Notes on case studies of instructional media projects. Working paper, the Academy for Educational Development, Washington, DC.
30.Strauss & Corbin(1997),質性研究概論(徐宗國譯)。台北:巨流圖書
31.Tauber(1981), Edward M. “Brand franchise extensions: New products benefit from existing brand names,” Business Horizons, 24(2), pp.36-41.
32.Thomas A, Stewart (1999), Knowledge management at work: telling tales at BP Amoco , FORTUNE, JUNE.
33.William F. Glueck ,(1976),  Business Policy : Strategy Formation and Management Action ,2nd ed. , McGraw-Hill, N.Y.,
34.Wilson, L. O. & Norton, J. A. (1989), Optimal Entry Timing for a Product Line Extension. Marketing Science, 8(1), 1-17. 
35.	Wright, P. M., McMahan, G. C., McCormick, B., & Sherman, W. S. (1998), Strategy, core competence, and HR involvement as determinants of HR effectiveness and refinery performance. Human Resource Management, 37(1).
36.Yin,R.(1994), Case Study Research : Design and Methods.(2ed).Thousand Oaks, CA:sage.
37.Zack, M. H. (1999), Managing codified knowledge. Sloan Management Review, 40(4).
論文全文使用權限
校內
紙本論文於授權書繳交後5年公開
同意電子論文全文授權校園內公開
校內電子論文於授權書繳交後5年公開
校外
同意授權
校外電子論文於授權書繳交後5年公開

如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信