淡江大學覺生紀念圖書館 (TKU Library)
進階搜尋


  查詢圖書館館藏目錄
系統識別號 U0002-0807200821153100
中文論文名稱 半導體電子零組件通路商與供應商間夥伴關係之研究
英文論文名稱 The Research of Partner Relationship of Supply Chain in Semiconductor Industry:The acer’s case
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中) 會計學系碩士在職專班
系所名稱(英) Department of Accounting
學年度 96
學期 2
出版年 97
研究生中文姓名 王秀華
研究生英文姓名 Shiu-Hua Wang
學號 792470352
學位類別 碩士
語文別 中文
口試日期 2008-06-16
論文頁數 110頁
口試委員 指導教授-黃振豊
委員-王維康
委員-張財源
中文關鍵字 供應鏈管理  夥伴關係  資訊分享  專屬性投資 
英文關鍵字 Supply chain management  Partnership  Information share  Specific Investments. 
學科別分類 學科別社會科學商學
中文摘要 供應鏈是通路型態中緊密程度最高的一種,因為企業與企業間的關係不再只是傳統的合作方式,而是一種相互依賴很深的商業模式,其緊密互動的模式稱之為「夥伴關係」(partnership)。21世紀,隨製造業、高科技產業等生產技術普遍提升與成熟,市場價格愈趨向自由競爭,企業組織的競爭優勢不再是以依賴下降空間有限的“降低成本”為主要策略。要能在通路上獲得競爭優勢,則其與供應鏈上的通路成員建立合作夥伴關係是必要的途徑。本研究探討半導體零組件通路商與上游不同供應商之間的夥伴關係,為日後發展後續供應商夥伴關係之改善依據,使夥伴關係管理在供應鏈作業發揮最大的績效。
本研究發現如下:
1.因供應商的背景、市場地位及產品屬性等結構上之差異,是造成代理合約主要差異的原因。
2.資訊分享會與供應鏈績效有正相關,而專屬性投資與供應鏈績效有相關但較不明顯。
3.夥伴關係在供應鏈管理有其影響,同時也與供應鏈績效有正相關。
英文摘要 It is the highest one of degree in an thorough fare type attitude to supply the chain, because the relation between the enterprises is no longer only traditional cooperative way, but one kind interdepends in very deep commercial way, its close and interdynamic way is called “the partnership”. In the 21st century, the developments are up to production technologics, such as the manufacturing industry, Hi-Tech industry to generally improve and ripe, the market price tends to the free competition, the competition advantage that enterprises organize is no longer to regard relying on dropping space limited “ lowering costs” as the main tactics. If a company can obtain the competition advantage on the thorough fare, it is an essential way that it establishes partnership relation with thorough fare members that supply with on the chain. We probe into the partnership between trader's suppliers different from the upper reaches of thorough fare of spare part of the semiconductor in this research, in order to develop the improvement basis of follow-up supplier's partnership in the future, and make the partnership managed and supplied the chain homework and producing the greatest performance.
The major findings in the research as follows:
1.As the suppliers exit in the difference between the market position and product attributes, there are major differences in there agent's contracts.
2.There is a positive correlation between chain performance and information sharing, and special attribute investment has some relevant to chain performance, but not too obvious.
3.The partnership has a significant influence on chain performance, and has a positive correlation to supply chain performance.
論文目次 目錄 I
表目錄 III
圖目錄 IV
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 6
第三節 研究流程 7
第二章 文獻探討 8
第一節 供應鏈管理 8
第二節 夥伴關係 12
第三節 選擇及維持夥伴關係的方法 22
第四節 資訊分享 26
第五節 專屬性投資 30
第三章 研究方法 34
第一節 個案研究法 34
第二節 觀念性研究架構及變數衡量 37
第三節 研究對象 42
第四節 資料收集 46
第四章 半導體零件通路產業及個案介紹 51
第一節 半導體通路商產業現況與發展 51
第二節 半導體通路商產業特性 53
第三節 半導體通路商發展趨勢 55
第四節 個案介紹 56
第五章 實證資料分析 63
第一節 主要供應商比較分析 64
第二節 夥伴關係的影響程度 76
第三節 供應鏈績效之分析 88
第四節 夥伴關係與績效整合分析 91
第六章 結論與建議 93
第一節 結論 93
第二節 研究建議 96
第三節 研究限制 97
參考文獻 98
附錄-問卷 107

表目錄
表2-1 夥伴關係之定義 13
表2-2 合約的特徵 15
表2-3 企業間的關係型態 17
表2-4 夥伴關係特徵 20
表2-5 資訊種類與資訊內容 27
表2-6 供應商與製造商之間交換的資訊 28
表3-1 不同研究策略的相關狀況 34
表3-2 個案研究處理四個研究設計測試問題的作法 36
表3-3 資訊分享要素衡量表 40
表3-4 各供應商銷售額佔建智集團銷售額百分比 44
表3-5 主要資料來源的優點和缺點 46
表3-6 訪談對象彙整 50
表4-1 建智集團歷年銷售額及成長率 59
表4-2 各供應商銷售額佔建智集團銷售額百分比 60
表5-1 建智與主要三家供應商代理合約差異整理彙總表 66
表5-2 採購作業系統流程代號說明 78
表5-3 建智主要供應商使用資訊系統及資訊交換種類 81
表5-4 建智主要供應商資訊交換數量統計表─3A4採購訂單發出及確認 82
表5-5 建智主要供應商資訊交換數量統計表─3A7採購訂單中項目變更通知 83
表5-6 建智與主要供應商資訊分享衡量表 84
表5-7 建智與主要供應商專屬性投資衡量表 86
表5-8 建智與主要供應商2003年至2007年連續五年成長率 91
表5-9 建智與主要供應商夥伴關係強度與供應鏈績效關聯圖 91

圖目錄
圖1-1 半導體產業關聯圖 5
圖1-2 研究流程圖 7
圖2-1 供應鏈流程的演進 9
圖2-2 夥伴關係的型態 19
圖2-3 管理與資訊系統階層圖 29
圖3-1 觀念性研究架構 38
圖3-2 各供應商銷售額佔建智集團銷售額百分比 43
圖3-3 建智集團主要供應商佔全公司銷售額百分比 44
圖4-1 半導體產業的領域 52
圖4-2 建智股份有限公司營運據點 57
圖4-3 建智組織架構之應用 58
圖4-4 建智集團歷年銷售額 59
圖4-5 各供應商銷售額佔建智集團銷售額百分比 60
圖4-6 建智集團主要供應商佔全公司銷售額百分比 61
圖4-7 建智與上下游供應鏈之關係圖 61
圖5-1 主要供應商產品結構圖 73
圖5-2 代理合約差異因素 74
圖5-3 採購作業系統流程圖 78
圖5-4 建智與主要供應商2003年至2007年連續五年銷售額 89
圖5-5 建智與主要供應商2003年至2007年連續五年毛利 90
圖6-1 通路商與供應商之夥伴關係圖 93

參考文獻 一、中文部份:(以筆劃排序)
古永嘉,2003,企業研究方法,第八版,台北市:華泰文化。
何欣怡,2007,供應鏈上下游廠商競合賽局,國立成功大學交通管理科學研究所碩士論文。
吳思華,2000,策略九說,台北市:臉譜文化。
李昭賢,1999,供應鍊管理分析模式之研究,國立中興大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
尚榮安 譯,2001,個案研究法,台北市:弘智文化。(Robert K. Yin, 1994. Case study research:design and methods(2nd ed.) Sage Publications, Inc.)
林煌基,2000,資訊共享以強化時間競爭力之研究:台灣半導體產業供應鏈資訊整合之實證分析,國立中山大學資訊管理學系研究所碩士論文。
林董祥,2000,影響供應鏈夥伴關係相關因素之研究-以半導體供應鏈為例,國立中央大學資訊管理學系碩士論文。
林鉦棽、王政智,2005,從社會交換理論與交易成本理論分析組織內之知識分享行為,人力資源管理學報,5(2):95-119。
施振榮,1996,再造宏痋A天下文化。
陳建南,2003,電子商務、夥伴關係、供應鏈管理與競爭優勢關係之研究-以台灣高科技產業為例,長榮大學經營管理研究所碩士論文。
陳朝志,2000,企業整合間整合篇─網際網路開創整合式商務新紀元,電子時報。
陳昱芬,2007,企業供應鏈管理績效之影響因素研究─跨組織資訊分享與夥伴關係的角色,國立中央大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。
陳娟娟,2004,美國產學合作標準化合約之比較研究,中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
陳悅琴,2000,跨國製造合作廠商間競合關係與策略發展研究─NIKE、豐泰、寶成間的三角關係,國立東華大學國際企業管理研究所碩士論文。
陳萬淇,1995,個案研究法,華泰書局。
游象傳,2004,供應商夥伴關係與e化程度對供應商績效之影響-以某顯示器製造商之供應商為例,元智大學管理研究所碩士論文。
黃珊倚,2005,夥伴供應商關係管理對物流績效影響之研究,淡江人文社會學刊,第30期:99-101。
黃珊倚,2005,夥伴供應商關係管理對物流績效影響之研究,淡江大學會計學系碩士班碩士論文。
葉勇助,2001,信任在網絡(雙方)統制結構之角色,元智大學資訊社會學研究所碩士論文。
盧娜 譯,2001,企業外包模式:如何利用外部資源提升競爭力,商周出版社,台北。
藍仁昌,1999,從物流角度建置供應鏈管理,資訊與電腦,第229期:73-78。
蘇雄義,1999,供應鏈整合-觀念性分析架構、整合程序與個案,東吳經濟商學學報,1-24。
二、英文部份:(以字母排序)
Akacum, A. and Dale, B.G. 1995. Supplier Partnering: Case study experiences. Journal of Supply Chain Management 31(1): 38-44.
Alam. A. 1996. Supply Chain Management. Journal of Strategic Management 13(3): 80-86.
Anderson, E., G.S., Day, and Rangan, V.K. 1997. Strategy Channels Design, Sloan Management Review, Cambridge. 138(4): 59-69.
Angulo, A., Nachtmann, H. and Waller, M. A. 2004. Supply chain information sharing in a vendor managed inventory partnership. Journal of Business Logistics 25(1): 101-120.
Barret, S. B. and Konsynsk. 1982. Inter-Organizationsl Information System, MIS Quarterly 93-105.
Beamon Benita M, 1998. Supply Chain Design and Analysis: Models and Methods, International Journal of Production Economics 55: 281-194.
Bensaou, M. 1999. Portfolios of Buyer-Supplier Relationships, Sloan Management Review, 40(4): 35-44.
Bock, G. W. and Kim, Y. 2002. Breaking the myths of rewards: An exploratory study of attitudes about knowledge sharing. Information Resources Management Journal 15(2): 14-21.
Boddy, D., Cahill, C., Charles, M., Fraser-Kraus, H. and Macbeth, D.K. 1998.Success and failure in implementing supply chain partnering: an empirical study, European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 4: 143-151.
Bowersox, D. J. and Closs, D. J. 1996. Logistical Management: The integrated supply chain process. McGraw Hill, New York.
Cai, S. Jun, M. and Yang, Z. 2006. The impact of interorganizational internet communication on purchasing performance: A Study of Chinese manufacturing firms. The Journal of Supply Chain Management 42(3): 16-29.
Carr. A. S. and Smeltzer. L. R. 1999. The relationship among purchasing benchmarking, strategic purchasing, firm performance, and firm size. The Journal of Supply Chain Management 35(4): 51-60.
Cash, J. I. and B. R. Konsynski. 1985. IS Redraws Competitive Boundaries. Harvard Business Review, 199-228.
Christopher, M. & Uta Juttner. 2000. Developing strategic partnerships in the supply chain: a practitioner perspective, European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management 6: 117-127.
Chung, S. Singh H., Lee K, 2000. Complementarity, status similarity and social capital as drivers of alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal 21(1): 1-22.
Claro, D. P., de Oliver Claro, P. B. and Hagelaar, G. 2006. Coordinating collaborative joint efforts with suppliers: The effects of trust, transaction specific investment and information network in the Dutch flower industry. Supply Chain Management 11(3): 216-224.
Daugherty, P. J. and Germain, R. and Droge, C. 1995. Predicting EDI technology adoption in logistics management: The influence of context and structure. Logistics and Transportation Review 31(4): 309-324.
Dyer, J. H., 1994. Dedicated assets: Japan’s manufacturing edge, Harvard Business Review 72(6): 174-178.
Dubois, A. and Gadde, L. E, 1997. Information technology and distribution strategy. Oxford, UK: Pergam on Press.
Dyer, J. H. and Nobeoka, H. 2000. Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: The Toyota Case. Strategic Management Journal 21: 345-367.
Ellram, L. M. & Hendrick, T. E, 1995. Partnering characteristics: a dyadic perspective, Journal of Business Logistics 16(1): 41-64.
Ellram, L. M. and Edis, O. R. V. 1996. A Case Study of Successful Partnering Implementation, Journal of Supply Chain Management 32(4).
Eng, T. Y. 2005. The influence of a firm’s cross-functional orientation on supply chain performance. The Journal of Supply Chain Management 41(4): 4-16.
Fisher, M. L. 1997. What Is The Right Supply Chain for Your Product? Harvard Business Review 92-106.
Ford, I. D. 1990. Understanding Business Markets: Interaction, Relationships, Networks, Academic Press, London.
Frankel, R. and Judith Schmitz Whipple, 1996. Alliance Formation Motives: A Comparison of International Perspectives, The International Journal of Logistics Management 7(7): 19-31.
Ganesan, S, 1994. Determinants of long-term orientation in buyer-sellerrelationships, Journal of Marketing 58(2): 1-19.
Gentry, J. J. 1996. The Role of Carriers in Buyer-Supplier Stragtegic Partnerships: A Supply Chain Management Approach, Journal of Business Logistics 17(2): 35-55.
Geringer, J. M. 1988. Selection of Partners for International Joint Ventures, Business Quarterly, 53(2): 31-36.
Griffith, D. A, Harvey, M. G. and Lusch, R. F., 2006. Social exchange in supply chain relationships: The resulting benefits of procedural and distributive justice. Journal of Operations Management 24(2): 85-98.
Handifield. and Nichols. 1999. Introduction to Supply Chain. Prentice-Hall.
Hippel, E., 1994. Sticky information and the locus of problem sloving: Implications for innovation, Management Science 40: 429-439.
Jap, S. D. 1999. Pie-Expansion Efforts: Collaboration Processes in Buyer-Supplier Relationships, Journal of Marketing Research 36: 461-475.
Jap, S. D. and Ganesan, S. 2000. Control mechanisms and the relationship life cycle: Implications for safeguarding specific investments and developing commitment. Journal of Marketing Research 37: 227-245.
Kahn, K. B., Maltz, E. N. and Mentzer, J. 2006. Demand collaboration: Effects on Knowledge creation, relationships, and supply chain performance. Journal of Business Logistics 27(2): 191-222.
Kogut, B. and Zander, U. 1992. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilitites, and the replication of technology, Organization Science 3: 383-397.
Kotzab, H., Skjoldager, N. and Vinum, T. 2003. The development and empirical validation of an e_based supply chain strategy optimization model. Industrial Management and Data Systems 103(5/6): 347-360.
Kwon I. G. and Suh, T. 2004. Factors affecting the level of trust and commitment in Supply Chain Relationships. Journal of Supply Chain Management 40(2): 4-14.
Kwon I. G. and Suh, T. 2005. Trust, commitment and relationships in supply chain management: A path analysis. Supply Chain Management 10(1): 26-33.
Larson, P. D. and Kulchitsky, J. D. 2000. The use and impact of communication media in purchasing and supply management. The Journal of Supply Chain Management 36(3): 29-39.
Lee, Hau. L. and Seungjin Whang. 2000. Information Sharing in a Supply Chain, International Journal of Technology Management 20(3/4): 373-387.
Lewis, J. D. 1990. Partnerships for Profit-Structuring And Managing Strategic Alliance, The Free Press. New York.
Lambert, D. M., Emmelhainz, M. A. and Gardner, J. T. 1996. Developing and Implementing Supply chain Partnerships, The International Journal of Logistics Management 2: 1-17.
Lambert, Douglas M. and Martha C. Cooper. 2000. Issuse in Supply Chain Management, Industrial Marketing Management 29: 65-83.
Maloni, Michael J. and W. C. Benton. 1997. Supply Chain Partnership:Opportunities for Operations Research, European Journal of Operational Research 419-429.
McCutcheon, D. and Stuart, F. I. 2000. Issues in the Choice of Supplier Alliance Partners, Journal of Operations Management 18: 279-301.
Medcof, J. W. 1997. “Why Too Many Alliances End in Divorce,” Long Range Planning, 30(5): 718-732.
Mentzer, DeWitt, Keebler, Min, Nix, Smith & Zacharia, 2001. Defining Supply Chain Management, Journal of Business Logistics 22(2): 1-25.
Mohr, J. and Nevin, J. R. 1990. Communication Strategies in Marketing Channels:A Theoretical Perspective, Journal of Marketing 34: 36-41.
Mohr, J. and Speak, R. 1994. Characteristics of Partnership Success: Partner Attributes, Communication Behavior, and Conflict Resolution Techniques, Strategic Management Journal 15(2): 393-416.
Mohr, J. and Sohi, R. S. 1995. Communication Flows in Distribution Channels: Impact on Assessments of Communication Quality and Satisfaction, Journal of Retailing 71(4): 393-416.
Morris, M. and Carter, C. R. 2005. Relationship marketing and supplier logistics performance: An extension of the key mediating variables model. The Journal of Supply Chain Management 41(4): 32-43.
Neves, P. and Caetanon, A. 2006. Social exchange processes in organizational change: The role of trust and control. Journal of Change Management 6(4): 351-364.
Palevich, Robert F. 1999. Supply Chain Management, Hosp Material Manage Q, reprinted with permission from APICS.
Pelton, L. E., D. Strutton, and J. R. Lumpkin. 1997. Marketing Channel: A Relationship Management Approach. Irwin: McGraw-Hill Companies.
Pelton, L. E., Strutton D. and Lumpkin J. R. 2001. Marketing Channel: A Relationship Management Approach. NY McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Rackham Neil, Lawerence Frifdman. & Richard Ruff. 1995. Getting Partnering Right: How Market Leaders Are Creating Long-term Competitive Advantage, N.Y. McGraw-Hill Press.
Rindfleisch, A. and Heide, J.B. 1997. Transaction cost analysis: Past, present and future applications, Journal of Marketing 61(4): 30-54.
Robey, Daniel. and Leo R. Vijayasarathy, 1997. The effect of EDI on market channel relationships in retailing, Information and Management 33: 73-86.
Seidmann, A., Sundararajan. 1998. Sharing Logistics information across organizations:technology, competition and contracting, in C.F. Kemerer(Edit), Information Technology and Industrial Competitiveness: How IT Shapes Competition, Kluwer Academic Pubilishers, 107-136.
Simon, H. A. 1996. Bounded rationality and organizational learning, In M. D. Cohen & L.S. Sproull (Ed.), Organization earning: 175-187. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Sriram, Ven. and Venkatapparao, Mummalaneni. 1990. Determinants of Source Loyalty in Buyer-Seller Relationships, National Association of Purchasing Management, October, 21-26.
Subramani, N. 2004. How do suppliers benefit from information technology use in supply chain relationships? MIS Quarterly, 28(1): 45-73.
Suh, T. and Kwon I.G. 2006. Matter over mind: When specific asset investment affects calculative trust in supply chain partnership. Industrial Marketing Management 35(2): 191-209.
Tan, Keah Choon., Vijay R. Kannan. and Robert, B. Handfield. 1998. Supply Chain Management: Supplier Performance and Firm Performance, International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, Summer, 2-9.
Tan, K. C. 2002. Supply chain management: Practices, concerns, and performance issues. The Journal of Supply Chain Management 38(1): 42-53.
Thomas, Douglas, J. and Paul, M. Griffin. 1996. Coordinated supply chain management, European Journal of Operational Research 94: 1-15.
Tuten, T. L. and Urban, D. J. 2001. An Expanded Model of Business-to-Business Partnership Formation and Success, Industrial Marketing Management 130(2): 149-164.
Yin, R. 1994. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Newburry Park., Sage Publications.
Wagner. B. A., Macbeth, D. K. and Boddy, D. 2002. Improving supply chain relations:an empirical case study, Supply Chain Management 7(3/4): 253-264.
Walton. L. W. 1996. Partnership satisfaction: Using the underlying dimensions of supply chain partnership to measure current and expected levels of satisfaction, Journal of Business Logistics 17(3): 57-75.
Williamson, O. E. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, Free Press, New York.
Williamson, O. E. 1995, Transaction cost economics and organization theory, In O. E. Williamson (Ed.), Organization theory: Erom Chester Barnard to the present and beyond: 207-256. New York: Oxford University Press.
Wilson, E. J. and Vlosky, R. P, 1995. An Integrated Model of Buyer-Seller Relationships, Journal of the Academy of Marking Science 23(4): 335-345.
Zack, M. H. 1999. Developing a knowledge strategy, California Management Revies, 41(3): 125-145.
論文使用權限
  • 同意紙本無償授權給館內讀者為學術之目的重製使用,於2008-07-17公開。
  • 不同意授權瀏覽/列印電子全文服務。


  • 若您有任何疑問,請與我們聯絡!
    圖書館: 請來電 (02)2621-5656 轉 2281 或 來信