§ 瀏覽學位論文書目資料
  
系統識別號 U0002-0707202117092700
DOI 10.6846/TKU.2021.00180
論文名稱(中文) 選擇權平均價性之長短期資訊意涵
論文名稱(英文) The Informativeness of Options Moneyness
第三語言論文名稱
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中文) 財務金融學系碩士班
系所名稱(英文) Department of Banking and Finance
外國學位學校名稱
外國學位學院名稱
外國學位研究所名稱
學年度 109
學期 2
出版年 110
研究生(中文) 許雅筑
研究生(英文) Ya-Chu Hsu
學號 608530597
學位類別 碩士
語言別 繁體中文
第二語言別
口試日期 2021-06-20
論文頁數 63頁
口試委員 指導教授 - 林蒼祥
共同指導教授 - 孫效孔
委員 - 吳中書
委員 - 蔡蒔銓
委員 - 林蒼祥
關鍵字(中) 選擇權平均價性
時間價值
資訊意涵
可預測性
關鍵字(英) AveMoney
Time Value
Informativeness
Predictability
第三語言關鍵字
學科別分類
中文摘要
由於台灣選擇權市場已具有相當之市場深度,本文使用台灣股價指數選擇權市場的詳細數據,對於台指選擇權的成交量及未平倉量的資訊意涵進行實證研究。本文依循Bergsma et al. (2020)提出之選擇權平均價性AveMoney為基礎,計算出台指選擇權平均價性長短期之資訊意涵,並分成三類:買賣權平均價性(All AveMoney)、買權平均價性(Call AveMoney)、賣權平均價性(Put AveMoney),其次將三種價性指標分別對近月、次近月及第一季月三種合約檢驗其長短期之資訊意涵,並定義短期為1至15天、中期為16至45天以及長期為46至60天。
AveMoney特別能夠反映槓桿使用的以及所衍生的獲利機會,選擇權交易的槓桿優勢,可以在短時間吸引較大的交易量及未平倉量,這些資訊使AveMoney對報酬產生預測能力。經過我們的實證研究發現越偏價外(OTM)的選擇權,越能吸引長期資訊交易者,從長遠來看,指數選擇權比指數期貨更好地預測了股價指數,而我們預測報酬率的結果則是買權比賣權有更顯著的預測能力,而以未平倉量計算之價性指標,也更能顯現對現貨指數報酬的長期預測能力。
本文與Pan and Poteshman (2006)使用賣買權未平倉比率(PCR)預測報酬率的不同之處在於,我們是以最直接的證據顯示OTM具有槓桿的優勢,此方法上的突破是我們最大的貢獻,才能深入探討長天期的預測能力。
英文摘要
Studies in literature have shown that informed traders are more inclined to trade in the options market than in the stock market because the former allows the use of higher leverage. As Taiwan’s options market has exhibited adequate market depth, this article employs daily data from the Taiwan’s index option market to investigate its informational implications of moneyness based on trading volume and open interest. According to the average moneyness (AveMoney) definition proposed by (Bergsma et al., 2020), this study analyzes the Informativeness of options moneyness. The analysis is conducted moneyness separately for the entire market (All AveMoney), call options only  (Call AveMoney) and put options only(Put AveMoney). The analysis for each category is further applied separately on expiration in the nearest month, the next nearest month, and the first quarter monthly contracts to test their long- and short-term informational implications. We define 1 to 15 days as short-term, 16 to 45 days as medium-term, and 46 to 60 days as long-term.
The leverage advantage and potential profits of options trading, which can be reflected by AveMoney, can attract a larger amount of volume and open interest. The amount of information coming out of trading and positions makes AveMoney possessing predictive power for returns. In the study I found that the more an option is out of the money, the more it can attractive long-term information traders. In the long run, index options predicts stock indices better than index futures. Furthermore, I found that call options have significantly more predictive power than put options. Also, open-interest-based AveMoney often predicts better than its volume-based counterparts.
The difference between this article and Pan and Poteshman (2006) using Put-Call Ratio to predict return is that we use the most direct evidence to show that OTM has the advantage of leverage. The breakthrough in this method is our greatest contribution. Long-term forecasting ability.
第三語言摘要
論文目次
目錄
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 5
第三節 研究架構 6
第四節 研究流程 7
第二章 文獻探討 8
第一節 指數與衍生性商品之相關文獻 8
第二節 預測報酬率之相關研究 11
第三節 選擇權價性之相關研究 13
第三章 研究方法 16
第一節 選擇權市場結構概述 16
第二節 研究樣本資料篩選 18
第三節 迴歸模型 22
第四節 變數說明 24
第四章 實證結果與分析 28
第一節 敘述統計分析 28
第二節 未消除自我相關迴歸結果分析 34
第三節 消除自我相關迴歸結果分析 42
第四節 穩健性檢定 51
第五章 結論與建議 58
參考文獻	60

表目錄
【表3-1】2007年至2017年各類選擇權商品年成交量統計表	17
【表3-2】台灣證券交易所股價指數選擇權合約規格表 18
【表3-3】台指選擇權各種合約之成交量占比表 21
【表4-1】高波動下選擇權平均價性成交量之敘述統計表 29
【表4-2】非高波動下選擇權平均價性成交量之敘述統計表 29
【表4-3】高波動下選擇權平均價性未平倉量之敘述統計表 30
【表4-4】非高波動下選擇權平均價性未平倉量之敘述統計表 30
【表4-5】樣本期間vix高波動與非高波動占比 31
【表4-6】選擇權價性之成交量敘述統計表 32
【表4-7】選擇權價性之未平倉量表敘述統計表 33
【表4-8】變數之敘述統計表 33
【表4-9】選擇權成交量平均價性之長短期資訊意涵 36
【表4-10】選擇權未平倉量平均價性之長短期資訊意涵 41
【表4-11】選擇權成交量平均價性之長短期資訊意涵 45
【表4-12】選擇權未平倉量平均價性之長短期資訊意涵 50
【表4-13】選擇權成交量平均價性之長短期資訊意涵 54
【表4-14】選擇權成交量平均價性之長短期資訊意涵 57

圖目錄
【圖1-1】研究流程圖 7
【圖4-1】樣本期間內的vix分布圖 31
【圖4-2】近月合約選擇權成交量平均價性之長短期資訊意涵t值圖 34
【圖4-3】次近月合約選擇權成交量平均價性之長短期資訊意涵t值圖 35
【圖4-4】遠月合約選擇權成交量平均價性之長短期資訊意涵t值圖 35
【圖4-5】近月合約選擇權未平倉量平均價性之長短期資訊意涵t值圖 38
【圖4-6】次近月合約選擇權未平倉量平均價性之長短期資訊意涵t值圖 	38
【圖4-7】遠月合約選擇權未平倉量平均價性之長短期資訊意涵t值圖 39
【圖4-8】近月合約選擇權成交量平均價性之長短期資訊意涵t值圖 42
【圖4-9】次近月合約選擇權成交量平均價性之長短期資訊意涵t值圖 43
【圖4-10】遠月合約選擇權成交量平均價性之長短期資訊意涵t值圖 43
【圖4-11】近月合約選擇權未平倉量平均價性之長短期資訊意涵t值圖 	46
【圖4-12】次近月合約選擇權未平倉量平均價性之長短期資訊意涵t值圖 	47
【圖4-13】遠月合約選擇權未平倉量平均價性之長短期資訊意涵t值圖 	48
【圖4-14】近月合約選擇權成交量平均價性之長短期資訊意涵t值圖 51
【圖4-15】次近月合約選擇權成交量平均價性之長短期資訊意涵t值圖 	52
【圖4-16】遠月合約選擇權成交量平均價性之長短期資訊意涵t值圖 52
【圖4-17】近月合約選擇權成交量平均價性之長短期資訊意涵t值圖 55
【圖4-18】次近月合約選擇權成交量平均價性之長短期資訊意涵t值圖	55
【圖4-19】遠月合約選擇權成交量平均價性之長短期資訊意涵t值圖 56
參考文獻
1.Admati, A. R., &Pfleiderer, P. (1988). A Theory of Intraday Patterns: Volume and Price Variability. Review of Financial Studies. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/1.1.3
2.Anthony, J. H. (1988). The Interrelation of Stock and Options Market Trading-Volume Data. The Journal of Finance. https://doi.org/10.2307/2328145
3.Bergsma, K., Csapi, V., Diavatopoulos, D., &Fodor, A. (2020). Show me the money: Option moneyness concentration and future stock returns. Journal of Futures Markets. https://doi.org/10.1002/fut.22071
4.Bhattacharya, M. (1987). Price Changes of Related Securities: The Case of Call Options and Stocks. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. https://doi.org/10.2307/2330866
5.Biais, B., &Hillion, P. (1994). Insider and Liquidity Trading in Stock and Options Markets. Review of Financial Studies. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/7.4.743
6.Black, F. (1975). Fact and Fantasy in the Use of Options. Financial Analysts Journal. https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v31.n4.36
7.Booth, G. G., So, R. W., &Tse, Y. (1999). Price discovery in the german equity index derivatives markets. Journal of Futures Markets. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9934(199909)19:6<619::AID-FUT1>3.0.CO;2-M
8.Çaǧli, E. Ç., &Evrim Mandaci, P. (2013). The long-run relationship between the spot and futures markets under multiple regime-shifts: Evidence from Turkish derivatives exchange. Expert Systems with Applications. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.01.026
9.Cao, C., Chen, Z., &Griffin, J. M. (2005). Informational content of option volume prior to takeovers. Journal of Business. https://doi.org/10.1086/429654
10.Chakravarty, S., Gulen, H., &Mayhew, S. (2004). Informed trading in stock and option markets. Journal of Finance. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00661.x
11.Chiang, R., &Fong, W. M. (2001). Relative informational efficiency of cash, futures, and options markets: The case of an emerging market. Journal of Banking and Finance. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4266(99)00127-2
12.Chung, S. L., Tsai, W. C., Wang, Y. H., &Weng, P. S. (2011). The information content of the S and P 500 index and VIX options on the dynamics of the S and P 500 index. Journal of Futures Markets. https://doi.org/10.1002/fut.20532
13.Diltz, J. D., &Kim, S. (1996). The relationship between stock and option price changes. Financial Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6288.1996.tb00883.x
14.Easley, D., O’Hara, M., &Srinivas, P. S. (1998). Option volume and stock prices: Evidence on where informed traders trade. Journal of Finance. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.194060
15.Figlewski, S. (1981). Futures Trading and Volatility in the GNMA Market. The Journal of Finance. https://doi.org/10.2307/2327030
16.Fleming, J., Ostdiek, B., &Whaley, R. E. (1996). Trading costs and the relative rates of price discovery in stock, futures, and option markets. Journal of Futures Markets. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9934(199606)16:4<353::AID-FUT1>3.0.CO;2-H
17.Fodor, A., Krieger, K., &Doran, J. S. (2011). Do option open-interest changes foreshadow future equity returns? Financial Markets and Portfolio Management. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11408-011-0164-z
18.Gang, J., Zhao, Y., &Ma, X. (2019). Put-call ratio predictability of the 50ETF option. Economic and Political Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/20954816.2019.1633823
19.Ge, L., Lin, T. C., &Pearson, N. D. (2016). Why does the option to stock volume ratio predict stock returns? Journal of Financial Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.08.019
20.Hasbrouck, J. (1995). One Security, Many Markets: Determining the Contributions to Price Discovery. The Journal of Finance. https://doi.org/10.2307/2329348
21.Hasbrouck, J. (2003). Intraday Price Formation in U.S. Equity Index Markets. In Journal of Finance. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1540-6261.2003.00609.x
22.Hu, J. (2014). Does option trading convey stock price informationα. Journal of Financial Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.12.004
23.Jong, F.De, &Donders, M. W. M. (1998). Intraday Lead-Lag Relationships Between the Futures-, Options and Stock Market *. Review of Finance. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1009765322522
24.Judge, A., &Reancharoen, T. (2014). An empirical examination of the lead-lag relationship between spot and futures markets: Evidence from Thailand. Pacific Basin Finance Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2014.05.003
25.Kang, J., Lee, C. J., &Lee, S. (2006). An Empirical Investigation of the Lead-Lag Relations of Returns and Volatilities among the KOSPI200 Spot, Futures and Options Markets and their Explanations. Journal of Emerging Market Finance. https://doi.org/10.1177/097265270600500303
26.Kaul, G., Nimalendran, M., &Zhang, D. (2011). Informed Trading and Option Spreads. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.547462
27.KAWALLER, I. G., KOCH, P. D., &KOCH, T. W. (1987). The Temporal Price Relationship between S&P 500 Futures and the S&P 500 Index. The Journal of Finance. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1987.tb04368.x
28.Lee, J., &Yi, C. H. (2001). Trade Size and Information-Motivated Trading in the Options and Stock Markets. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. https://doi.org/10.2307/2676221
29.Li, M. Y. L. (2009). The dynamics of the relationship between spot and futures markets under high and low variance regimes. Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry. https://doi.org/10.1002/asmb.753
30.Lin, W. T., Tsai, S. C., Zheng, Z., &Qiao, S. (2017). Does options trading convey information on futures prices? North American Journal of Economics and Finance. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2016.10.005
31.Lin, W. T., Tsai, S. C., Zheng, Z., &Qiao, S. (2018). Retrieving aggregate information from option volume. International Review of Economics and Finance, 55, 220–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2017.07.018
32.Manaster, S., &Rendleman, R. J. (1982). Option Prices as Predictors of Equilibrium Stock Prices. The Journal of Finance. https://doi.org/10.2307/2327766
33.Mayhew, S., Sarin, A., &Shastri, K. (1995). The Allocation of Informed Trading Across Related Markets: An Analysis of the Impact of Changes in Equity-Option Margin Requirements. The Journal of Finance. https://doi.org/10.2307/2329329
34.O’Connor, M. L. (1999). The cross-sectional relationship between trading costs and lead/lag effects in stock & option markets. Financial Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6288.1999.tb00471.x
35.Pan, J., &Poteshman, A. M. (2006). The information in option volume for future stock prices. Review of Financial Studies. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhj024
36.Roll, R., Schwartz, E., &Subrahmanyam, A. (2010). O/S: The relative trading activity in options and stock. Journal of Financial Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2009.11.004
37.Ryoo, H. J., &Smith, G. (2004). The impact of stock index futures on the Korean stock market. Applied Financial Economics. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960310042000201183
38.Ryu, D. (2015). The information content of trades: An analysis of KOSPI 200 index derivatives. Journal of Futures Markets. https://doi.org/10.1002/fut.21637
39.Zhong, M., Darrat, A. F., &Otero, R. (2004). Price discovery and volatility spillovers in index futures markets: Some evidence from Mexico. Journal of Banking and Finance. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2004.05.001
論文全文使用權限
校內
校內紙本論文立即公開
同意電子論文全文授權校園內公開
校內電子論文立即公開
校外
同意授權
校外電子論文立即公開

如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信