系統識別號 | U0002-0607201615004600 |
---|---|
DOI | 10.6846/TKU.2016.00198 |
論文名稱(中文) | 歐盟外交與安全政策高級代表之角色研究 |
論文名稱(英文) | The Role Study of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy |
第三語言論文名稱 | |
校院名稱 | 淡江大學 |
系所名稱(中文) | 歐洲研究所碩士班 |
系所名稱(英文) | Graduate Institute of European Studies |
外國學位學校名稱 | |
外國學位學院名稱 | |
外國學位研究所名稱 | |
學年度 | 104 |
學期 | 2 |
出版年 | 105 |
研究生(中文) | 黃彧璿 |
研究生(英文) | Yu-Hsuan Huang |
學號 | 602290321 |
學位類別 | 碩士 |
語言別 | 繁體中文 |
第二語言別 | |
口試日期 | 2016-06-25 |
論文頁數 | 129頁 |
口試委員 |
指導教授
-
張福昌(chang010806@mail.tku.edu.tw)
委員 - 郭武平(wpkwo@mail.nhu.edu.tw) 委員 - 苑倚曼(yuan_tku@yahoo.com.tw) |
關鍵字(中) |
歐洲聯盟 共同外交與安全政策 共同安全與防衛政策 高級代表 |
關鍵字(英) |
EU CFSP CSDP High Representative |
第三語言關鍵字 | |
學科別分類 | |
中文摘要 |
1993年歐盟於馬斯垂克條約中建立了共同外交與安全政策,而後於1999年在阿姆斯特丹條約中創設了共同外交與安全政策高級代表的角色,2005年憲法條約改革中提出歐盟外交部長一職,遭到法國與荷蘭否決,2009年里斯本條約承襲了憲法條約中的重大改革,將高級代表重新命名為歐盟外交與安全政策高級代表,賦予他/她擔任歐洲執委會副主席與外交理事會主席的權利,並得以提案推行共同外交與安全政策以及共同安全與防衛政策,對外於國際上代表歐盟發聲,其底下也設置歐洲對外行動處來協助高級代表完成任務,形成里斯本條約後歐盟共同外交與安全政策的新局面,藉由擴大高級代表的權限與資源,提升歐盟外交政策的效率與對外行動的一致性,並增強歐盟作為國際行為者的影響力。 本文以制度主義為基礎,首先,敘述高級代表一職的發展沿革;接著,分析第一與第二代高級代表的職權,以及索拉納與艾希頓在共同外交與安全政策中的表現,並比較第一與第二代高級代表的差異,做進一步的剖析;最後,界定高級代表在歐盟扮演的角色,說明是否對共同外交與安全政策帶來正面的影響。 |
英文摘要 |
In 1993, the European Union (EU) gave birth to the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) in the Maastricht Treaty. And the High Representative (HR) of the CFSP was first established by the Amsterdam Treaty in 1999. In 2005, the Convention on the Future of Europe proposed the revolutionary post “The Union Minister for Foreign Affairs”. However, the Constitutional Treaty was rejected by France and the Netherlands. After all, in 2009, the Lisbon Treaty inherited the significant reformation and renamed it High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy. They attributed the important tasks to the HR to be one of the Vice-President of the European Commission and presiding over the Foreign Affairs Council. The HR also has the right of initiative in the CFSP and the Common Security and Defense Policy. He/she shall represent the Union and express the Union’s position in the international conferences and organizations. In addition, the European External Action Service was created to assist the HR to accomplish his/her tasks. It had become a new era of the EU foreign policy. The EU gave the HR wider power and more resources to enhance the effectiveness and consistency of the foreign policy and external action and to empower the EU to become an influential global actor. This paper will aim at the post of the HR and use Institutionalism as its theoretical basis. First, it will describe the course of change and development of the HR. Second, it will analyze the authority of the HR, the performance of Javier Solana and Catherine Ashton, and the differences between them. Finally, it will define the role of the HR and conclude that whether the HR bring positive effect to the CFSP. |
第三語言摘要 | |
論文目次 |
目錄 第一章 緒論 第一節 研究動機與研究目的…………………………………………… 1 第二節 研究範圍與研究限制…………………………………………… 4 第三節 問題意識與研究理論…………………………………………… 5 第四節 文獻探討……………………………………………………………………18 第五節 研究架構……………………………………………………………………31 第二章 高級代表的沿革 第一節 馬斯垂克條約時期…………………………………………………34 第二節 阿姆斯特丹條約時期……………………………………………37 第三節 憲法條約至里斯本條約時期………………………………41 第三章 高級代表的職權 第一節 第一代高級代表:索拉納(Javier Solana)…………………………46 第二節 第二代高級代表:艾希頓(Catherine Ashton)…………………56 第三節 第一與第二代高級代表比較………………………………………………74 第四章 高級代表的角色 第一節 歐盟對外代表………………………………………………………………82 第二節 歐洲外交政策提案者…………………………………………………87 第三節 歐盟外交行動指揮官…………………………………………………89 第四節 歐盟外交理事會主席…………………………………………………96 第五章 結論 ………………………………………………………………………102 參考文獻 ……………………………………………………………………………106 附錄 …………………………………………………………………………………111 圖目錄 〈圖一〉研究架構圖…………………………………………………32 〈圖二〉里約後歐盟對外代表新三駕馬車圖………………………85 〈圖三〉歐洲對外行動處組織結構圖………………………………91 〈圖四〉里斯本條約後「共同外交與安全政策」運作體系………97 表目錄 〈表一〉 第一與第二代高級代表職權與角色比較表………………75 〈表二〉 第一與第二代高級代表經歷與特質比較表………………80 |
參考文獻 |
參考文獻 一、 中文文獻 (一)專書論文 宋學文:新自由制度主義之過去、現在與未來,刊載於:包宗和(編):國際關係理論,台北:五南書局,2013年,頁143-158。 徐斯勤:新自由主義與新自由制度主義,刊載於:包宗和(編):國際關係理論,台北:五南書局,2013年,頁119-133。 (二)期刊論文 胡至沛:新制度主義的檢視與反思,刊載於:中國行政評論,第11卷,第1期,2001年,頁148-149。 張福昌:歐洲政治一體化的發展與前瞻,刊載於:歐洲研究(北京),第2期,2012年,頁117-118。 黃宗昊:歷史制度論的方法立場與理論建構,刊載於:問題與研究,第49卷,第3期,2010年,頁149-150。 蔡相庭:歷史制度主義的興起與研究取向─政治學研究途徑的探討,刊載於:臺北市立教育大學學報,第41卷,第2期,2010年,頁55-56。 鄭耀瑞:國際關係「新自由制度主義」理論之評析,刊載於:問題與研究,第32卷,第12期,1997年,頁10-14。 盧業中:論國際關係理論之新自由制度主義,刊載於:問題與研究,第41卷,第2期,2002年,頁50-51。 二、 西文文獻 (一)專書 Becker-Alon, Shira: The communitarian dimension of the european union's common foreign and security policy, Baden-Baden: Nomos Publishers, 2011. Müller-Brandeck-Bocquet, Gisela /Rüger, Carolin (eds.): The High Representative for the EU Foreign and Security Policy: Review and Prospects, Baden-Baden: Nomos publishers, 2011. (二)專書論文 Denza, Eileen: The Role of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, in: Blanke, Hermann-Josef/Mangiameli, Stelio (eds.): The European Union after Lisbon-Constitutional Basis, Economic Order and External Action, Heidelberg: Springer, 2012, pp. 482-486. Dijkstra, Hylke: Solana and his Civil Servants: An Overview of Political-Administrative Relations, in: Müller-Brandeck-Bocquet, Gisela/Rüger, Carolin (eds.): The High Representative for the EU Foreign and Security Policy: Review and Prospects, Baden-Baden: Nomos publishers, 2011, pp. 4-10. Kaddous, Christine: Role and position of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy under the Lisbon Treaty, in: Griller, Stefan/Ziller, Jacques (eds.): The Lisbon Treaty-EU Constitutionalism without a Constitutional Treaty? Wien: Springer-Verlag, 2008, pp. 170-171. Morillas, Pol: Institutionalization or Intergovernmental Decision-Taking in Foreign Policy: The Implementation of the Lisbon Treaty, in: Cardwell, Paul James (ed.): EU External Relations Law and Policy in the Post-Lisbon Era, The Hague: T.M.C.ASSER PRESS, 2012, pp. 121-122. Schmidt, Julia: The High Representative, the President and the Commission—Competing Players in the EU’s External Relations: The Case of Crisis Management, in: Cardwell, Paul James (ed.): EU External Relations Law and Policy in the Post-Lisbon Era, The Hague: T.M.C.ASSER PRESS, 2012, pp. 170-171. A. Wessel, Ramses: Initiative and Voting in Common Foreign and Security Policy: The New Lisbon Rules in Historical Perspective, in: Blanke, Hermann-Josef/Mangiameli, Stelio (eds.): The European Union after Lisbon-Constitutional Basis, Economic Order and External Action, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2012, pp. 155-156. Wouters, Jan/Coppens, Dominic/De Meester, Bart: The European Union’s External Relations after the Lisbon Treaty, in: Griller, Stefan/Ziller, Jacques (eds.): The Lisbon Treaty-EU Constitutionalism without a Constitutional Treaty? Horn: SpringerWienNewYork, 2008, pp. 155-156. (三)期刊論文/學位論文 Dehousse, Franklin: After Amsterdam A Report on the Common Foreign and Security Policy of the European Union, in: European Journal of International Law, Vol. 9, 1998, pp. 526-529. Dijkstra, Hylke: EU External Representation in Conflict Resolution: When does the Presidency or the High Representative Speak for Europe? In: European Integration online Papers, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2011, pp. 4-6. European Union Center of North Carolina: The EU’s High Representative for Foreign and Security Policy, in: EU Briefings, 2010, pp. 1-2. Gaspers, Jan: The Quest for European Foreign Policy Consistency and the Treaty of Lisbon, in: University of Cambridge, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2012, pp. 26-27. Helwig, Niklas: EU Foreign Policy and the High Representative’s Capability-Expectations Gap: A question of Political Will, in: European Foreign Affairs Review, Vol. 18, No. 2, 2013, pp. 237-242. Howorth, Jolyon: Catherine Ashton’s five-year term: a Difficult Assessment, in: Les Cahiers européens de Sciences Po, Vol. 1, No. 3, 2011, pp. 6-18. Keohane, Robert: International Institutions: Two Approaches, in: International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 32, No. 4, 1988, pp. 382-383. Koehler, Kateryna: European Foreign Policy after Lisbon: Strengthening the EU as an International Actor, in: Caucasian Review of International Affairs, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2010, pp. 58-67. Krasner, Stephen: Structural causes and regime consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables, in: International Organization, Vol. 36, No. 2, 1982, p. 186. Lehne, Stefan: A Window of Opportunity to Upgrade EU Foreign Policy, in: Carnegie Europe, 2013, pp. 6-11. Marangoni, Anne-Claire: One Hat Too Many for the High Representative-Vice President? The Coherence of EU’s External Policies after Lisbon, in: EU External Affairs Review, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2012, pp. 7-10. ONDEJČIKOVÁ, Barbora: High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy: an Unconventional Minister of Foreign Affairs? University of Leuven Master’s thesis, Leuven, 2013, pp. 37-50. Paul, Jonas: EU Foreign Policy After Lisbon Will the New High Representative and the External Action Service Make a Difference? In: Center for Applied Policy Research, Vol. 1, No. 2, 2008, pp. 9-12. Płeszka, Maciej: High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy – Analysis of the Lisbon Treaty Provisions, in: Yearbook of Polish European Studies, Vol. 13, No. 1, 2010, pp. 84-105. Schack, Patrick/Blankenburg, Mads: The European Union: A Changing Global Role? In: University of Roskilde EU-studies projects, 2013, pp. 12-16. Schmid, Martin: The Deputisation of the High Representative/Vice-President of the Commission: Making the Impossible Job Work, in: EU Diplomacy Papers, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2012, pp. 8-9. The House of Commons: Foreign Policy Aspects of the Lisbon Treat-Third Report of Session 2007–08, in: Foreign Affairs Committee, 2008, pp. 50-56. Weichert, Thomas: Lisbon Treaty and CFSP: Will there be Increased Integration? University of Twente Master’s thesis, Enschede, 2010, pp. 28-29. Wessels, Wolfgang/Bopp, Franziska: The Institutional Architecture of CFSP after the Lisbon Treaty-Constitutional breakthrough or challenges ahead? In: Challenge Liberty & Security, Vol. 1, No. 10, 2008, pp. 19-23. Wouters, Jan/Bijlmakers, Stephanie/Meuwissen, Katrien: The EU as a Multilateral Security Actor after Lisbon: Constitutional and Institutional Aspects, in: Leuven Centre for Global Governance Studies, No. 80, 2012, pp. 18-21. Zanon, Flavia: The High Representative for the CFSP and EU security culture: mediator or policy entrepreneur? University of Trento Ph.D. dissertation, Trento, 2012, pp. 1-49. |
論文全文使用權限 |
如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信