淡江大學覺生紀念圖書館 (TKU Library)
進階搜尋


下載電子全文限經由淡江IP使用) 
系統識別號 U0002-0507202111540200
中文論文名稱 商業生態系統與併購績效之研究:生命週期與永續性平衡計分卡觀點
英文論文名稱 The Study of Business Ecosystem and Post-M&A Integration Performance: The Life Cycle and Sustainability Balanced Scorecard Perspectives
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中) 企業管理學系碩士班
系所名稱(英) Department of Business Administration
學年度 109
學期 2
出版年 110
研究生中文姓名 曾羿勳
研究生英文姓名 Yi-Hsun Tseng
學號 608610191
學位類別 碩士
語文別 中文
口試日期 2021-06-08
論文頁數 72頁
口試委員 指導教授-陳基祥
委員-賴明政
委員-洪英正
委員-陳基祥
中文關鍵字 併購  商業生態系統  企業生命週期  平衡計分卡  永續性平衡計分卡 
英文關鍵字 Mergers and Acquisitions  Business Ecosystem  Corporate Life Cycle  Balance Scorecards  Sustainability Balanced Scorecard 
學科別分類
中文摘要 全球化的競爭趨勢下產業架構與經營型態已時過境遷,企業透過併購(Mergers and Acquisitions, M&A)來創造成長能力與維持競爭優勢是近幾年來不可或缺的一環。面對新科技網絡與知識經濟時代,商業生態系統(Business Ecosystem)已成為企業競爭環境中的主軸,必須了解身處在商業生態系統中能夠創造出的最佳價值;此外企業生命週期(Corporate Life Cycle)的每個階段都會面臨到不同的生存問題與挑戰使企業價值也隨之改變,為了能適時因應經營策略,使企業能夠提升績效達到永續發展的機會與開創出新的循環,然而環境生態保護與社會倫理責任乃是企業永續發展的重點,因此將「永續性」及「利害關係人」加入平衡計分卡(BSC)當中,成為永續性平衡計分卡(Sustainability BSC)以利企業永續發展之目的。綜合上述,本研究以台灣的併購個案與次級資料的收集再進行分析研究,透過商業生態系統、企業生命週期與永續性平衡計分卡的觀點結合作為併購績效之評估依據,以利未來達成企業併購目的之參考。
英文摘要 Under the trend of global competition, the situation of industrial structure and business model have been changed. Therefore, it is an indispensable part that enterprises adopt Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A) to create growth capabilities and maintain competitive advantage. Facing the new technology network and the era of knowledge economy, the Business Ecosystem has become the main axis in the corporate competitive environment. It is an important issue that companies must understand the best value they can create in the Business Ecosystem. In addition, each stage of the Corporate Life Cycle will face different survival problems and challenges, which will change the value of the company. In order to respond to the business strategy in a timely manner, so that the company can improve performance to achieve sustainable development opportunities and create a new cycle. As the environmental protection and social ethical responsibility are the focus of sustainable development of enterprises, so "sustainability" and "interested parties" are added to the Balance Scorecards. Therefore, it becomes the Sustainability Balanced Scorecard to facilitate the sustainable development of the enterprise. Based on the above, the researcher collects of Taiwanese M&A cases and secondary data to conduct the research. The combination of business ecosystem, corporate life cycle and sustainability balanced scorecards is used as the basis for evaluating M&A performance to facilitate the future achievement of corporate mergers and acquisitions.
論文目次 目錄
目錄 I
圖目錄 II
表目錄 III
第一章、 緒論 1
第一節 、研究背景 1
第二節 、研究動機 4
第三節 、研究目的 5
第四節 、研究流程 6
第二章、 文獻探討 7
第一節 、併購(Mergers and Acquisitions, M&A) 7
第二節 、商業生態系統(Business Ecosystem) 12
第三節 、企業生命週期(Corporate Life Cycle) 15
第四節 、績效評估 21
第三章、 研究方法 29
第一節 、研究架構 29
第二節 、資料分析方法 30
第三節 、研究對象 35
第四章、 個案分析 36
第一節 、個案之介紹 36
第二節 、個案績效之分析 43
第五章、 結論與建議 55
第一節 、研究結論 55
第二節 、管理意涵 62
第三節 、研究限制與未來研究建議 63
參考文獻 64
中文文獻 64
英文文獻 65
網路文獻 71

圖目錄
圖 1-1 全球併購交易數量與金額 2
圖 1-2 台灣併購交易數量與金額 3
圖 1-3 個案產業鏈 4
圖 1-4 研究流程 6
圖 2-1 程序的觀點與公司存續狀態之分類 7
圖 2-2 企業價值鏈 10
圖 2-3 商業模式 13
圖 2-4 現有與預期之價值網絡 13
圖 2-5 商業生態系統 14
圖 2-6 企業生命週期 18
圖 2-7 生命週期之類型 20
圖 2-8 永續性平衡計分卡之因果關係連結 22
圖 2-9 平衡計分卡之四大構面 24
圖 2-10 平衡計分卡與永續性平衡計分卡之整合架構 26
圖 3-1 研究架構 29
圖 3-2 台灣經濟新報三大特色 33
圖 3-3 台灣企業資料之架構 34
圖 4-1 大大網數位平台服務之架構 37
圖 4-2 A公司之關係企業(1) 38
圖 4-3 A公司之關係企業(2) 39
圖 4-4 客戶需求的通路服務商業生態系統 44
圖 4-5 A公司之企業生命週期 45
圖 4-6 B公司之企業生命週期 46
圖 5-1 B公司歷史股價日線圖 56
圖 5-2 B公司歷史股價年線圖 56
圖 5-3 全球半導體主要應用市場銷售數量 58
圖 5-4 A公司全球市佔率與排名 59
圖 5-5 A公司中國銷售淨額 59
圖 5-6 A公司年營收 60

表目錄
表 2-1 生命週期發展階段之分析 19
表 2-2 永續性平衡計分卡之落後指標與領先指標 26
表 2-3 永續性平衡計分卡之指標範例 27
表 3-1 A公司歷年之併購事件 35
表 4-1 A公司之產品結構 40
表 4-2 A公司計畫開發之新產品與服務 41
表 4-3 B公司之產品結構 42
表 4-4 A公司之財務指標 48
表 4-5 A公司之永續性財務指標 48
表 4-6 A公司投資控股股份有限公司之顧客指標 50
表 4-7 A公司投資控股股份有限公司之內部流程指標 51
表 4-8 A公司投資控股股份有限公司之永續性內部流程指標 52
表 4-9 A公司之學習與成長指標 53
表 4-10 A公司之永續性學習與成長指標 54
表 5-1 永續績效重點 61
參考文獻 參考文獻
中文文獻
王貳瑞(2014),學術論文寫作,臺北市:台灣東華書局股份有限公司。
余尚武、江玉柏(1998),影響企業購併成敗之因素與策略探討,經濟情勢暨評論,第四卷,第二期,125-144頁。
呂侃霓(2019),製藥產業的併購-以健喬集團為例,國家實驗研究院科技政策研究與資訊中心。
李馨蘋、林苡雯、程心瑤(2017),以企業生命週期觀點探討智慧資本的價值攸關性, 評價學報,第十一期,21-48頁。
吳芳銘(2006),併購成長:面對中國高速經濟成長的策略,臺北市:時英出版社。
邱垂昌、洪福讚(2008),在不同企業生命週期下智慧資本與企業價值關聯性之研究,當代會計,第九卷,第二期, 201-236頁。
章法筑(2015),產業分工、靈活應變-大聯大與捷元結合案,公平交易電子報,第三十四期
張永煬、陳基祥(2011),兩岸企業購併後整合與產品開發績效之探討:外部及內部整合之觀點, 遠景基金會季刊,第十二卷,第二期,135-182頁。
陳則銘(2004),企業併購之相關智慧財產管理策略與法律規劃研究-以併購美國高科技公司時之專利查核評估探微,國立政治大學,智慧財產研究所,碩士論文。
鈕文英(2019),質性研究方法與論文寫作。臺北市:雙葉書廊有限公司。
鈕文英、吳裕益(2015),單一個案研究法:研究設計與後設分析,新北市:心理出版社股份有限公司。

英文文獻
Adizes, I. (1988). Corporate Life Cycle: How and Why Corporations Grow and Die and What Do about It. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Aharony, J., Falk, H. & Yehuda, N. (2006). Corporate Life Cycle and the Relative Value-Relevance of Cash Flow Versus Accrual Financial Information. Working Paper, Citeseer.
Barney, J. B. (1995). Looking inside for competitive advantage. Journal of Management, (17), 99-120.
Bena, J., & Li, K. (2014). Corporate innovations and mergers and acquisitions. The Journal of Finance, 69 (5), 1923-1960.
Bender, R. (2013). Corporate financial strategy. Routledge.
Bick, P., Crook, M. D., Lynch, A. A., & Walkup, B. R. (2017). Dose Distance Matter in Mergers and Acquisitions? The Journal of Financial Research, 40(1), 33-54.
Bieker, T., & Waxenberger, B. (2002). Sustainability balanced scorecard and business ethics-developing a balanced scorecard for integrity management.
Collins, J. D., Holcomb, T. R., Certo, S. T., Hitt, M. A., & Lester, R. H. (2009). Learning by Doing: Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions. Journal of Business Research, 62(12), 1329-1334.
Crompton, J. L., Reid, I. S., & Uysal, M. (1987). Empirical Identification of Product Life-Cycle Patterns in the Delivery of Municipal Park and Recreation Services. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 5(1).
Damodaran, A. (2017). Narrative and numbers: the value of stories in business. Columbia University Press.
Danchev, A. (2006). Social capital and sustainable behaviour of the firm, Industrial management & Data systems. 106(7), 953-965.
DePamphilis, D. (2019). Mergers, acquisitions, and other restructuring activities: An integrated approach to process, tools, cases, and solutions. Academic Press.
Dias-Sardinha, I., Reijnders, L., & Antunes, P. (2002). From environmental performance evaluation to eco-efficiency and sustainability balanced scorecards. Environmental Quality Management, 12(2), 51-51.
Eilon, S. (2012). Management strategies: A critique of theories and practices. Springer Science and Business Media.
Epstein, M. J., & Wisner, P. S. (2001). Using a balanced scorecard to implement sustainability. Environmental Quality Management, 11(2), 1-10.
Figge, F., Hahn, T., Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2002). The sustainability balanced scorecard–linking sustainability management to business strategy. Business Strategy and The Environment, 11(5), 269-284.
Fridolfsson, S. O., & Stennek, J. (2005). Why mergers reduce profits and raise share prices: A theory of preemptive mergers. Journal of the European Economic Association, 3(5), 1083-1104.
Graebner, M. E., Heimeriks, K., Huy, Q. N., & Vaara, E. (2017). The process of post-merger integration: A review and agenda for future research. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 1–32.
Gudmundsson, S. V., Merkert, R., & Redondi, R. (2020). Cost structure effects of horizontal airline mergers and acquisitions. Transport Policy, 99, 136-144.
Gulec, O. F., & Karacaer, S. (2017). Corporate life cycle methods in emerging markets: Evidence from Turkey. Journal of Economics Finance and Accounting, 4(3), 224-236.
Hannabarger, C., Buchman, F., & Economy, P. (2011). Balanced scorecard strategy for dummies. John Wiley & Sons.
Hsieh, C. E. (2004). Strengths and weaknesses of qualitative case study research. University of Leicester Publishing, 86-116.
Hsu, Y. L., & Liu, C. C. (2010). Environmental performance evaluation and strategy management using balanced scorecard. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 170(1-4), 599-607.
Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004a), Strategy as ecology. Harvard Business Review, 82(3), 68-78.
Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004b). The Keystone advantage: What the new dynamics of business ecosystems mean or strategy, innovation, and sustainability. Harvard Business Press.
Kalender, Z. T., & Vayvay, Ö. (2016). The fifth pillar of the balanced scorecard: sustainability. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235, 76-83.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The Balanced Scorecard-Measures that Driver Performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action, Harvard Business Press.
Karami, G., & Omrani, H. (2010). The Impact of Firm Life Cycle on the Company's Performance and Risk Measures. Research in Financial Accounting, 2 (5), 49-64.
King, D.R., Covin, J.G. & W. H.Hegarty (2003). Complementary Resources and theExploitation of Technological Innovations, Journal of Management, 29(4),pp.589-608.
Leviäkangas, P., & Öörni, R. (2020). From business models to value networks and business ecosystems-What does it mean for the economics and governance of the transport system? Utilities Policy, 64, 101046.
Lusch, R. F., (2010). Reframing supply chain management: A service-dominant logic perspective. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 47(1), 14-18.
Marr, B., & Adams, C. (2004). The Balanced Scorecard and Intangible Assets: Similar Ideas, Unaligned Concepts. Measuring Business Excellence, 8(3), 18-27.
Maksimovic, V., & Phillips, G. (2008). The Industry Life Cycle, Acquisitions and Investemnt: Does Firm Organization Matter?. The Journal of Finance, 63(2), 673-708.
McGrath, R. (2019). Seeing around corners: How to spot in ection points in business before they happen. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Möller, K., Nenonen, S., & Storbacka, K. (2020). Networks, ecosystems, fields, market systems? Making sense of the business environment. Industrial Marketing Management, 90, 380-399.
Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and Prey: A New Ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 71(3), 75-86.
Niven, P. R. (2002). Balanced scorecard step-by-step: Maximizing performance and maintaining results. John Wiley and Sons.
Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York, Free Press.
Rabbani, A., Zamani, M., Yazdani-Chamzini, A., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2014). Proposing a new integrated model based on sustainability balanced scorecard (SBSC) and MCDM approaches by using linguistic variables for the performance evaluation of oil producing companies. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(16), 7316-7327.
Rahmani, A., Mousavi, M. M., & Qytasy, R. (2011). The Relationship between Profitability and Return in Regard to Firm Size and the Life Cycle. Accounting Research, 3(9), 104-115.
Rothaermel, F.T. (2001). Incumbent's Advantage through Exploiting Complementary Assets via Interfirm Cooperation. Strategic Management Journal, 22 (6-7), 687-699.
Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. (2002). Edith Penrose's Contribution to the Resource-based View of Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 23(8), 769-780.
Sarala, R., Vaara, E., & Junni, P. (2019). Beyond merger syndrome and cultural differ-ences: New avenues for research on the “human side” of global mergers and acqui- sitions (M&As). Journal of World Business, 54(4), 307–321.
Stanley, F. R., Alexandra, R. L., & Nesvold Peter, H. (1999). The art of M&A: A Merger Acquisition Buyout Guide.
Seth, A., Song, K. P., & Pettit, R. R. (2002). Value Creation and Destruction inCross-border Acquisitions: An Empirical Analysis of Foreign Acquisitions of U.S. Firms. Strategic Management Journal, 23(10), 921-940.
Wang, L., & Zajac, E. J. (2007). Acquisition or alliance? A dyadic perspective on interfirm resource combinations. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1291-1317.
Wu, J. L, & Hua, Y. H. (2018). Key Risk Factors of Financial Holding Companies in Taiwan: An Integrated Approach of DEMATEL-Based ANP and Risk Management Balanced Scorecard. Tai Da Guan Li Lun Cong, 28(2), 205.
Wynn, D. E. (2003). Organizational structure of open source projects: A life cycle approach. In Abstract for 7th Annual Conference of the Southern Association for Information Systems, Georgia.
Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage publications.
Yu, Y., Umashankar, N., & Rao, V. R., (2016). Choosing the right target: Relative preferences for resource similarity and complementarity in acquisition choice. Strategic Management Journal, 37(8), 1808-1825.

網路文獻
Institute for Mergers, Acquisitions and Alliances, Number and Value of M&A Worldwide,
搜尋日期:2020/09/14
https://imaa-institute.org/mergers-and-acquisitions-statistics/
經濟部商業司,企業併購資料查詢,搜尋日期:2020/09/14
https://gcis.nat.gov.tw/mainNew/subclassNAction.do?method=list&pk=126
徐郁婷(2015),TEJ台灣經濟新報企業簡介,搜尋日期:2020/11/10
http://www.lib.tku.edu.tw/uploads/archive_file_multiple/file/5683a2e24eae354dc10108f9/TEJ_2015.pdf
大聯大控股官網,搜尋日期:2020/09/30
https://www.wpgholdings.com/about/info/zhtw/about-group
MoneyDJ理財網-理財、財經綜合資訊網,大聯大投資控股股份有限公司,搜尋日期:2020/09/24
https://www.moneydj.com/KMDJ/Wiki/WikiViewer.aspx?KeyID=07eb25e4-1a4e-4206-b19a-ae3ba1cf2144
DIGITIMES(2019),大聯大推出數位平台「大大網」協助客戶全面數位轉型,搜尋日期:2020/09/24
https://www.digitimes.com.tw/tech/dt/n/shwnws.asp?cnlid=13&id=0000572863_OFQ7LGK97JCWID2BXYJK8
捷元官網,搜尋日期:2020/09/24
https://www.genuine.com.tw/
MoneyDJ理財網-理財、財經綜合資訊網,捷元股份有限公司,搜尋日期:2020/09/24
https://www.moneydj.com/kmdj/wiki/wikiviewer.aspx?keyid=76367765-f149-4a52-802e-46b902c55276
Goodinfo!台灣股市資訊網,捷元財務報表,搜尋日期:2020/09/24
https://goodinfo.tw/StockInfo/StockFinDetail.asp?RPT_CAT=IS_M_QUAR_ACC&STOCK_ID=5384
論文使用權限
  • 同意紙本無償授權給館內讀者為學術之目的重製使用,於2021-07-07公開。
  • 同意授權瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2021-07-07起公開。


  • 若您有任何疑問,請與我們聯絡!
    圖書館: 請來電 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信 dss@mail.tku.edu.tw