為了因應全球經濟環境變化迅速，近年來高科技產業的公司都開始使用專案組織或專案團隊來回應全球化與顧客的多元化，以達成企業目標。
  但由於專案的特性下，易導致團隊成員變動頻繁與知識的流失；因此，對於組織而言，建立專案團隊流暢的運作與做好知識管理就變得相當重要；而這兩者之間的關係將如何影響到專案績效，則成為本研究的動機與目的。
  本研究從McGrath(1964)的團隊效能模型開始著手，藉此探討團隊運作流程在知識管理成效與專案績效之間是否存在中介作用。抽樣方式採用滾雪球抽樣法，抽取國內曾在高科技產業從事過專案之人員為研究樣本。針對回收的有效樣本151份資料，進行敘述性統計、信度分析、因素分析、相關分析、階層迴歸分析和二因子變異數分析。經實證分析之後，獲致結論如下：
 (1).知識管理成效對團隊運作流程有顯著的正向影響效果
 (2).團隊運作流程對專案績效有顯著的正向影響效果
 (3) 團隊運作流程在知識管理成效和專案績效之間有完全中介作用
 (4).專案特徵在知識管理成效和團隊運作流程之間具有干擾作用
 (5).專案特徵在團隊運作流程和專案績效之間具有干擾作用
  最後，依據研究結果，對高科技產業之專案團隊及未來研究提出具體建議，以供參考。

Under the pressure of globalization, high-tech industries use project organization or project teams to respond quickly to the environmental changes and customer demand and reach the enterprise goals.
  However, the loss of a member of project team can cause a loss of knowledge. Thus, Knowledge management is becoming an important strategic issue in project management.
  This research adopts team effectiveness model developed by McGrath (1964) and investigates whether team process may play a mediating role on the associations between knowledge management and project performance.
  This study uses snowball sampling to collect data. A total 151 project responses in the Taiwanese high-tech industries were collected. Descriptive statistics, validity analysis, factor analysis, correlation analysis, hierarchical regression analysis and two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were employed in this study. The research findings are presented as below:
 1.Knowledge management has positive impacts on team  
   process.
 2.Team process has positive impacts on project  
   performance.
 3.The relationship between knowledge management and 
   project performance is fully mediated by team process.
 4.The relationship between knowledge management and team 
   process is moderated by project characteristics.
 5.The relationship between team process and project 
   performance is moderated by project characteristics.
  Finally, research limit, recommendations for future research, and research implications were also discussed.

目錄
表目錄	III
圖目錄	VI
第一章 緒論	1
第一節 研究背景與動機	1
第二節 研究目的	2
第三節 研究貢獻	3
第四節 研究流程與架構	3
第二章 文獻回顧	6
第一節 知識管理	6
第二節 團隊運作流程	14
第三節 專案績效	18
第四節 專案特徵	22
第五節 研究假設發展	24
第三章 研究方法和研究設計	27
第一節 研究模型	27
第二節 研究假設	27
第三節 變數定義與問卷設計	28
第四節 樣本選取及來源	33
第五節 資料分析方法	34
第四章 資料分析與研究成果	36
第一節 樣本資料統計分析	36
第二節 因素分析與信度分析	37
第三節 相關性分析	44
第四節 專案績效之影響分析	46
第五節 團隊運作流程之中介效果分析	53
第六節 專案特徵對於知識管理成效與團隊運作流程關係之干擾效果分析	56
第七節 專案特徵對於團隊運作流程與專案績效關係之干擾效果分析	61
第八節 假設驗證結果	68
第五章 結論與建議	70
第一節 研究結論	70
第二節 管理意涵	72
第三節 研究建議與限制	73
參考文獻	75
中文文獻	75
英文文獻	75
附錄 問卷	86

表目錄
表 1-3-1 團隊效能模型研究結果一覽表                     4
表 2-1-1知識的觀點和知識管理的執行                      7
表 2-1-2知識的形式                                      8
表 2-1-3知識管理成效的評估準則                         12
表 2-1-3知識管理成效的評估準則(續)                     13
表 2-1-3知識管理成效的評估準則(續)                     14
表 2-2-1各學者對團隊定義一覽表                         14
表 2-2-2團隊運作流程的評估準則                         16
表 2-2-2團隊運作流程的評估準則(續)                     17
表 2-3-1專案績效構面(衡量指標)                         20
表 2-3-1專案績效構面(衡量指標)(續)                     21
表 2-3-1專案績效構面(衡量指標)(續)                     22
表 3-3-1各學者衡量知識管理一覽表                       28
表 3-3-2本研究使用知識管理成效之問項表                 29
表 3-3-3各學者衡量團隊運作流程一覽表                   30
表 3-3-4本研究使用團隊運作流程之問項表                 30
表 3-3-5各學者衡量專案績效一覽表                       31
表 3-3-6本研究使用專案績效之問項表                     32
表 3-3-7各學者衡量專案特徵一覽表                       33
表 4-1-1敘述統計表                                     36
表 4-1-1敘述統計表(續)                                 37
表 4-2-1知識管理成效之KMO與Bartlett檢定表              38
表 4-2-2知識管理成效構面之因素分析表                   39
表 4-2-3團隊運作流程之KMO與Bartlett檢定表              40
表 4-2-4團隊運作流程構面之因素分析表                   41
表 4-2-5專案績效之KMO與Bartlett檢定表                  42
表 4-2-6專案績效構面之因素分析表                       42
表 4-2-6專案績效構面之因素分析表(續)                   43
表 4-2-7問卷信度分析表                                 43
表 4-3-1主構面之相關性分析表                           44
表 4-3-2次構面之相關性分析                             45
表 4-4-1知識管理成效對團隊運作流程之迴歸分析表         47
表 4-4-2團隊運作流程對專案績效之迴歸分析表             47
表 4-4-3知識管理成效對專案績效之迴歸分析表             48
表 4-4-4知識管理成效之次構面對問題解決能力之迴歸分析表 48
表 4-4-5知識管理成效之次構面對團隊決策能力之迴歸分析表 49
表 4-4-6團隊運作流程之次構面對專案整體成功之迴歸分析表 50
表 4-4-7團隊運作流程之次構面對專案時程之迴歸分析表     50
表 4-4-8團隊運作流程之次構面對專案成本之迴歸分析表     51
表 4-4-9知識管理成效之次構面對專案整體成功之迴歸分析表 52
表 4-4-10知識管理成效之次構面對專案時程之迴歸分析表    52
表 4-4-11知識管理成效之次構面對專案成本之迴歸分析表    53
表 4-5-1團隊運作流程對知識管理成效與專案績效之層級迴歸分析表                                                     54
表 4-5-2問題解決能力對知識文件化之分享與專案績效之層級迴歸分析表                                                 55
表 4-5-3團隊決策能力對知識文件化之分享與專案績效之層級迴歸分析表                                                 55
表 4-6-1知識管理成效集群分析結果表                     56
表 4-6-2知識管理成效與支持度對團隊運作流程之二因子變異數分析表                                                   57
表 4-6-3知識管理成效與團隊運作流程之相關係數表，以支持度為分類變數                                               58
表 4-6-4知識管理成效與支持度對團隊決策能力之二因子變異數分析表                                                   59
表 4-6-5知識管理成效與團隊決策能力之相關係數表，以支持度為分類變數                                               60
表 4-6-6知識管理成效與委託者對團隊決策能力之二因子變異數分析表                                                   60
表 4-6-7知識管理成效與團隊決策能力之相關係數表，以委託者為分類變數                                               61
表 4-7-1團隊運作流程集群分析結果表                     62
表 4-7-2團隊運作流程與團隊人數對專案績效之二因子變異數分析表                                                     63
表 4-7-3團隊運作流程與專案績效的相關係數表，以團隊人數分類變數                                                   64
表 4-7-4團隊運作流程與團隊人數對專案時程之二因子變異數分析表                                                     65
表 4-7-5團隊運作流程與專案時程的相關係數表，以團隊人數分類變數                                                   65
表 4-7-6團隊運作流程與團隊人數對專案整體成功之二因子變異數分析表                                                 66
表 4-7-7團隊運作流程與專案整體成功的相關係數表，以產業類型分類變數                                               67
表 4-8-1假設驗證結果一覽表                             69

圖目錄
圖 1-4-1研究流程圖5
圖 2-1-1知識管理的概念9
圖 2-1-2知識管理重要元素架構圖9
圖 2-1-3知識的價值鏈理論10
圖 2-1-4知識管理價值鏈模式11
圖 2-2-1 McGrath(1964)的描述性模型15
圖 2-4-1建築專案成功的層級模型23
圖 3-1-1本研究之模型圖27
圖 4-2-1修改後研究架構圖44
圖 4-6-1組織支持度對知識管理成效與團隊運作流程之交互作用圖58
圖 4-6-2組織支持度對知識管理成效與團隊決策能力之交互作用圖59
圖 4-6-3專案委託者對知識管理成效與團隊決策能力之交互作用圖61
圖 4-7-1團隊人數對團隊運作流程與專案績效之交互作用圖64
圖 4-7-2團隊人數對團隊運作流程與專案時程之交互作用圖65
圖 4-7-3產業類型對團隊運作流程與專案時程之交互作用圖67

中文文獻
1.玉井智子(2001)。團隊組織特徵、運作過程、團隊績效之關係研究-台日學生之差異比較。國立中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
2.陳彥如(2009)。專案經理領導能力、團隊承諾與專案績效之關聯性研究：以高科技產業為例。淡江大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
3.翁麗雀，戴玉慈，黃秀梨和陳淑齡(2007)。問題解決的涵義、測量與影響之概述。護理雜誌，第54卷第4期。
4.野中郁次郎，羅耀宗譯(2008)。企業的知識生產線。哈佛商業評論全球繁體中文版，Vol.11，頁1-11。
5.Arthur Andersen Business Consulting 著，劉京偉 譯(2000)。知識管理的第一本書。商周出版。
6.Housel, T. and Bell, A. H.著，李書政 譯(2002)。知識管理：理論‧評估‧應用。美商麥格羅‧希爾國際股份有限公司 台灣分公司。
7.Khalil, T. H. 著，姜禮輝 譯(2005)。科技管理(修訂版)。美商麥格羅‧希爾國際股份有限公司 台灣分公司。
8.Wysocki, R. K. and McGary, R.著，劉育銘 和 顏怡宏 譯(2005)。專案管理。學貫行銷股份有限公司。
英文文獻
1.	Afolabi, O.A. and Ehigie, B.O. (2005), “Psychological diversity and team interaction processes：A study of oil-drilling work teams in Nigeria”, Team Performance Management, Vol. 11, No.7/8,pp. 280-301.
2.	Ahn, J.H. and Chang, S.G. (2004), “Assessing the contribution of knowledge to business performance: the KP3 methodology”, Decision Support Systems, Vol. 36, pp. 403-16.
3.	Akgün, A.E. , Byrne, J.C. , Lynn, G.S. and Keskin, H. (2007), “Team stressors, management support, and project and process outcomes in new product development projects”, Technovation,Vol.27,pp.628–639.
4.	Alavi, M. and Leidner, D. E. (2001), “Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues”, MIS Quarterly, Vol.25, No.1, pp.107-136
5.	Armbrecht, F. M. R ., Chapas, R. B., Chappelow, C. C., Farris, G. F., Friga, P. N., Hartz, C. A., McIlvaine, M. E., Postle, S. R. and Whitwell, G. E. (2001), “Knowledge management in research and development”, Research Technology Management, Vol. 44 No. 4, pp.28-48.
6.	Arthur Andersen Business Consulting, “Zukai Knowledge Management”, Tokyo Keizar Inc., Japan, 1999
7.	Atkinson, R., (1999), “Project management: cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, it’s time to accept other success criteria”, International Journal of Project Management, Vol.17, No.6, pp.337-342.
8.	Babbington-Smith, B. (1979), Training in Small Groups, Pergammon Press, Oxford.
9.	Baldwin, T.T., Bedell, M.D. and Johnson, J.L. (1997), “The social fabric of a team-based MBA program: network effects on student satisfaction and  performance”,  Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 40 No. 6, pp. 1369-97.
10.	Barad, M. and Raz, T. (2000), “Contribution of quality management tools  and practices to project management performance” , International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol.17,No.4/5,pp.571-583.
11.	Barki, H. and Hartwick, J. (2001), “Interpersonal conflict and its management in information system development”, Mis Quarterly, Vol.25, No.2, pp.195-228.
12.	Baron, R. M. and Kenny, D. A. (1986). “The Moderator-Mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategy, and statistical considerations”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.51, No.6, pp.1173-1182.
13.	Beck, P. , Jiang, J. J. , Klein, G. (2006), “Prototyping mediators to project performance: Learning and interaction”, The Journal of Systems and Software, Vol.79, pp.1025-1035.
14.	Brachos, D. , Kostopoulos, K. , Soderquist, K. E. and Prastacos, G. (2007), “Knowledge effectiveness, social context and innovation”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 11, No. 5, pp.31-44,
15.	Brown, M. G., and Svenson, R. A.(1988), “Measuring R&D Productivity,” Research Technology Management, Vol.31, No.4, pp. 11-15.
16.	Bryde, D. J. (2003), “Modelling project management Performance”, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp.229-254.
17.	Chan, A. P.C. and Tam, C. M. (2000) , “Factors affecting the quality of building projects in Hong Kong”, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 17, No.4/5, pp. 423-441.
18.	Chase, R. (1997), “Knowledge management benchmarks”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol.1, No.1, pp.83-92.
19.	Chatzoglou, P. D. (1997), “Factors affecting completion of the requirements capture stage of projects with different characteristics”, Information and Software Technology, Vol.39, No.9, pp.627-640
20.	Chen, C. J. and Huang, J. W.,(2007), “How organizational climate and structure affect knowledge management - The social interaction perspective”, International Journal of Information Management ,Vol.27, pp.104-118.
21.	Chen, C. J. and Huang, J. W. (2009), “Strategic human resource practices and innovation performance - The mediating role of knowledge management capacity“, Journal of Business Research , Vol.62,pp.104-114.
22.	Cho, K. M. , Hong, T. H. and Hyun, C. T.(2009), “Effect of project characteristics on project performance in construction projects based on structural equation model”, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol.36, pp.10461-10470.
23.	Choi, B. and Lee, H.(2003), “An empirical investigation of KM styles and their effect on corporate performance”, Information & Management, Vol.40, pp.403–417.
24.	Chua, D. K. H., Kog, Y. C. and Loh, P. K. (1999), “Critical success factors for different project objectives”, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 125, No. 3, pp. 142-50.
25.	Chua, A.(1999), “The influence of social interaction on knowledge creation”, Journal of Intellection Capital, Vol.3, No.4, pp.375-392.
26.	Cramton, C. D. and Webber, S. S. (2005), “Relationships among geographic dispersion, team processes, and effectiveness in software development work teams”, Journal of Business Research, Vol.58, pp.758-765.
27.	Cronbach, L .J. (1951), “Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests” , Psycholometrika,Vol.16, pp.297-334.
28.	Deephouse, C., Mukhopadhyay, T., Goldenson, D. R., and Kellner, M. I. (1995-96), “Software Processes and Project Performance”, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.12, No.6 ,pp. 187-205.
29.	Deeter-Schmelz, D.R., Kennedy, K.N., and Ramsey, R.P. (2002), “Enriching Our Understanding of Student Team Effectiveness,” Journal of Marketing Education, Vol.23, No.2, pp.114-124.
30.	Disterer, G. (2002), “Management of Project Knowledge and Experiences”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol.6, No.5, pp.512-520.
31.	Drucker, P. F. (1993), Post-capitalist Society, Harper Business, New York, NY.
32.	Gelbard, R. and Carmeli, A. (2009) “The interactive effect of team dynamics and organizational support on ICT project success”, International Journal of Project Management,Vol.27, No.5, pp.464–470
33.	Gladstein, D. L(1984), “Groups in Context: A Model of Task Group Effectiveness”, Administrative Science Quarterly,Vol.29,No.4, pp.499-517
34.	Gold, A. H. , Malhotra, A. and Segars, A. H. (2001) , “Knowledge Management：An Organizational Capabilities Perspective.”, Journal of Management Information Systems,Vol.18, No.1, pp.185-214.
35.	Grugle, N. L. and Kleiner, B. M. (2007), “Effects of chemical protective equipment on team process performance in small unit rescue operations”, Applied Ergonomics , Vol.38, pp.591-600.    
36.	Hall, R. I. , Aitchison, P. W. and Kocay, W. L.(1994), “Causal policy maps of managers: Formal methods for elicitation and analysis”, System Dynamics Review, Vol.10, pp.337-360.
37.	Hanisch, B. , Lindner, F. , Mueller, A. and Wald, A. (2009), “Knowledge management in project environments”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol.13,No.4,pp.148-160.
38.	Higgs, M. and Dulewicz, V. (1998), “Top team processes: does 6 + 2 = 10?”, Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 13 No. 1/2, pp. 47-62.
39.	Higgs, M. (1999), “Teams and team working: what do we know?”, Henley Management College Report, No. HWP 9911.
40.	Ho, L. A. (2008), “What affects organizational performance?：The linking of learning and knowledge management”, Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 108, No. 9, pp. 1234-1254.
41.	Ho, C. T. (2009), “The relationship between knowledge management enablers and performance”, Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol.109, No.1, pp. 98-117.
42.	Hong, H. K. , Kim, J. S. , Kim, T. , Leem, B. H. (2008), “The effect of knowledge on system integration project performance”, Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 108 No. 3, pp. 385-404.
43.	Hu, M. L. M. , Horng, J. S. and Sun, Y. H. C. (2009), “Hospitality teams: Knowledge sharing and service innovation performance”, Tourism Management, Vol.30, pp. 41-50.
44.	Huang, J. W. and Li, Y. H. (2009), “The mediating effect of knowledge management on social interaction and innovation performance” International Journal of Manpower, Vol. 30 No. 3, 2009, pp. 285-301.
45.	Hyväri, I. (2006), “Project management effectiveness in project-oriented business organizations”, International Journal of Project Management, Vol.24, pp.216-225.
46.	International Organization for Standardization (ISO), (2003). ISO 10006:2003 standard: Quality management systems - Guidelines for quality management in projects, 32
47.	Jiang, J. J. , Klein, G. and Pick, R. A. (2003), “The impact of IS department organizational environments upon project team performances”,  Information & Management , Vol.40, pp.213-220.
48.	Jin, X. H. and Ling, F. Y. Y. (2006), “Key relationship-based determinants of project performance in China”, Building and Environment, Vol.41, pp. 915-925.
49.	Kaiser, H. F. (1970), “Little Jiffy, Mark IV”, Psychological, Vol.35 , pp.401-405
50.	Kalling, T. (2003), “Knowledge management and the occasional links with performance”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 7,No. 3, pp. 67-81
51.	Katzenbach, J. R. and Smith, D.K. (1993), The Wisdom of Teams, McGraw Hill, Maidenhead.
52.	Keller, R. T. (1994) ,“Technology-information processing fit and the performance of R&D project groups: A test of contingency theory ” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 37,No1, pp.167-179.
53.	Kiessling, T. S. , Richey, R. G. , Meng, J. and Dabic, M. (2009) , “Exploring knowledge management to organizational performance outcomes in a transitional economy”, Journal of World Business, Vol.44, No.4, pp.421-433
54.	Kwak, E. J. L. (2004), “Team Effectiveness and Characteristics: Apparel Product Development Teams”, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Florida State University College of Human Sciences.
55.	Lauras, M. , Marques, G. , Gourc, D.(2010) , “Towards a multi - dimensional project performance measurement system”, Decision Support Systems, Vol.48, No.2, pp.342-353
56.	Lee, C. C. and Yang, J. (2000), “Knowledge Value Chain”, The Journal of Management Development, Vol.19, No.9, pp.783-794 
57.	Lee, H. and Choi, B. (2003), “Knowledge Management Enablers, Processes, and Organizational Performance: An Integrative View and Empirical Examination”, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.20, No.1, pp.179-228.
58.	Lee, J. C. , Lee, S. and Kang, I. W. (2005), “KMPI: measuring knowledge management performance”, Information & Management , Vol.42 , pp.469-482.
59.	Lee, H. Y. , Lee, Y. K. and Kwon, D. (2005), “The intention to use computerized reservation systems: the moderating effects of organizational support and supplier incentive”, Journal of Business Research,Vol.58, pp. 1552-1561.
60.	Leonard, D. and Sensiper, S. (1998), “The role of tacit knowledge in group innovation”, California Management Review, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp.112-31.
61.	Leseure, M. J. and Brookes, N. J.( 2004), “knowledge management benchmarks for project management” ,Journal of Knowledge management, Vol.8, No1, pp.103-116.
62.	Levett, G. P. and Guenov, M. D. (2000), “A methodology for knowledge management implementation”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol.4,  No.3, pp. 258-269.
63.	Liang, T. P. , Liu, C. C. , Lin, T. M. and Lin, B. (2007), “Effect of team diversity on software project performance”, Industrial Management & Data Systems,Vol.107, No.5, pp.636-653.
64.	Lin, H. F. and Lee, G. G. (2005), “Impact of organizational learning and knowledge management factors on e-business adoption”, Management Decision, Vol.43, No.2, pp.171-188.
65.	Lin, B. W. (2007), “Information technology capability and value creation: Evidence from the US banking industry”, Technology in Society, Vol. 29, pp.93-106.
66.	Ling, F. Y. Y. and Liu, M. (2004) , “Using neural network to predict performance of design-build projects in Singapore”, Building and Environment, Vol.39, pp.1263-1274.
67.	Ling, F. Y. Y. , Low, S. P. , Wang, S. Q. and Lim, H. H. (2009), “Key project management practices affecting Singaporean firms’ project performance in China”, International Journal of Project Management, Vol.27, pp.59-71.
68.	Lingham, T. , Richley, B. A. and Serlavos, R. S. (2009), “Measuring and mapping team interaction：A cross-cultural comparison of US and Spanish MBA teams”, Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 5-27.
69.	Low, S. P. and Chuan, Q. T. (2006), “Environmental factors and work performance of project managers” , International Journal of Project Management, Vol.21,No.1, pp. 24-37.
70.	Mathieu, J., Gilson, L. and Ruddy, T. (2006), “Empowerment and team effectiveness: an empirical test of an integrated model”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 91 No. 1, pp. 97-108.
71.	McGrath, J. E., (1964). Social Psychology: a Brief Introduction. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York
72.	Muller, R. and Turner, J. R. (2007), “Matching the project manager’s leadership style to project type”, International Journal of Project Management, Vol.25, No.1, pp. 21-32.
73.	Na, K. S. , Li, X. , Simpson, J. T. and Kim, K. Y. (2004), “Uncertainty profile and software project performance: A cross-national comparison” , The Journal of Systems and Software, Vol.70, pp. 155-163.
74.	Na, K. S. , Simpson, J. T. , Li, X. , Singh, T. and Kim, K. Y. (2007),  “Software development risk and project performance measurement: Evidence in Korea” ,The Journal of Systems and Software, Vol.80, pp. 596-605.
75.	Nieva, V.F., Fleishman, E.A., Rieck, A., (1978). “Team dimensions: their identity, their measurement, and their relationships”. Final Technical report, ARI Contract DAHC 19078-C-001. Advanced Research Resources Organization, Washington, DC.
76.	Oberty, C. Z. and Saá-Pérez, P. D.,(2006) “Work teams to favor knowledge management: towards communities of practice” European Business Review, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 60-76.
77.	Parolia, N. , Goodman, S. , Li, Y. and Jiang, J. J. (2007), “Mediators between coordination and IS project performance” , Information & Management, Vol.44, pp.635-645.
78.	Pattikawa, L. H , Verwaal, E. and Commandeur, H. R. (2006) , “Understanding new product project performance”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 40,No. 11/12, pp. 1178-1193.
79.	Peslak, A. and Stanton, M. (2007), “Information technology team achievement： An analysis of success factors and development of a team success model (TSM)”, Team Performance Management, Vol. 13 No. 1/2, pp. 21-33.
80.	Pillai, A. S. , Joshi, A. and Rao, K. S. (2002), “Performance measurement of R&D projects in a multi-project, concurrent engineering environment”, International Journal of Project Management, Vol.20, No.2, pp.165-177
81.	Porter, T. W. and Lilly, B. S. (1996), “The effects of conflict, trust and task commitment on project team performance”, International Journal of Conflict Management, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 361-76.
82.	Qu, G. , Ji, S. and Min, Q. (2008), “Inter-Organizational Coordination, IT Support, and Environment”, Tsinghua Science and Technology, Vol.13, No.3, pp. 374-382.
83.	Qureshi, T. M. , Warraich, A. S. and Hijazi, S. T. (2009), “Significance of project management performance assessment (PMPA) model”, International Journal of Project Management, Vol.27, pp. 378–388.
84.	Sheard, A. G. and Kakabadse, A. P. (2004), “A process perspective on leadership and team development”, Journal of Management Development , Vol. 23, No.1, pp.7-106.
85.	Stewart, G. L. and Barrick, M. R. (2000), “Team structure and performance: Assessing the mediating role of intrateam process and the moderating role of task type”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol.43, No.2, pp.135-148.
86.	Suh, T. , Bae, M. , Zhao, H. , Kim, S. H. and Arnold, M. J. (2010), “ A multi-level investigation of international marketing projects: The roles of experiential knowledge and creativity on performance”, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol.39, No.2, pp.211-220.
87.	Swink, M. (2000), “Technological Innovativeness as a Moderator of New Product Design Integration and Top Management Support”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol.17, pp.208-220
88.	Tampoe, M. (1993), “Motivating knowledge workers-The challenge for the 1990s” , Long Range Planning, Vol.26, No.3, pp.49-55
89.	Toor, S. R., Ogunlana, S. O., (2008), “Critical COMs of success in large-scale construction projects: evidence from Thailand construction industry. International Journal of Project Management, Vol.26, No.4, pp.420-430.
90.	Toor, S. R., Ogunlana, S. O., (2009), “Construction professionals’ perception of critical success factors for large-scale construction projects in Thailand” Construction innovation: Information, Process, Management, Vol.9, No.2, pp.133-150.
91.	Wang, Eric. T. G , Wei, H. L. , Jiang, J. J. , Klein, G. (2006), “User diversity impact on project performance in an environment with organizational technology learning and management review processes”, International Journal of Project Management, Vol.24,No.5, pp.405-411.
92.	Wang, C. H. , Lee, Y. D. , Lin, W. I. and Zhuo, L. T. (2007), “Effects of Personal Qualities and Team Processes on Willingness to Share Knowledge：An Empirical Study”, International Journal of Management, Vol.24, No.2, pp.250-256.
93.	Wang, M. L., Chen, W. U., Lin, Y. Y., and Hsu, B. F. (2010), “Structural characteristics, process, and effectiveness of cross-functional teams in hospitals: Testing the I-P-O model” Journal of High Technology Management Research, Vol.21, pp.14-22
94.	Watson, W. E , Ponthieu, L. D. and Critelli, J. W. (1995), “Team Interpersonal Process Effectiveness in Venture Partnerships And Its Connection to Perceived Success”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol.10, pp.393-411.
95.	Wateridge, J. (1995), “IT projects: a basis for success”, International of Journal Project Management, Vol.13, No.3, pp.169-172.
96.	Watson, W. E. , BarNir, A. and Pavur, R. (2005), “Cultural diversity and learning teams: The impact on desired academic team processes” , International Journal of Intercultural Relations, Vol.29, pp. 449–467.
97.	Weggeman, M. (1997), “Kennismanagement, inrichting en besturing van kennisintensieve organisaties”, Scriptum Management, Schiedam
98.	Wen, Y. F. (2009), “An effectiveness measurement model for knowledge management”, Knowledge-Based Systems, Vol.22, pp.363–367.
99.	Werner, J. M. and Lester, S.W. (2001) , “Applying a team effectiveness framework to the performance of student case teams”, Human Resource Development Quarterly, Vol.12, No. 4, pp.385-402.
100.	Yang, L. R., Hung, C. F., Wu, K. S. (2010), “The association among project manager's leadership style, teamwork and project success”. International Journal of Project Management, In Press, Corrected Proof, Available online 14 May 2010
101.	Yu, S. H. , Kim, Y. G. and Kim, M. Y. (2007) , “Do we know what really drives KM performance?” Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 11, No.6, pp. 39-53.
102.	Zack, H. M.(1999), “Managing Codified Knowledge”, Sloan Management Review, Vol. 40, No.4, pp. 45-58.
103.	Zárraga, C. and Garcia-Falcon, J. M. (2003), “Factors favoring knowledge management in work teams”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vo7, No2, pp.81-96.