§ 瀏覽學位論文書目資料
系統識別號 U0002-0507200714282000
DOI 10.6846/TKU.2007.01084
論文名稱(中文) 環境資訊揭露與利害關係人關聯性之研究
論文名稱(英文) The Relationship Between Stakeholder and Environmental Information Disclosure
第三語言論文名稱
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中文) 會計學系碩士班
系所名稱(英文) Department of Accounting
外國學位學校名稱
外國學位學院名稱
外國學位研究所名稱
學年度 95
學期 2
出版年 96
研究生(中文) 許志豪
研究生(英文) Chih-Hao Hsu
學號 694470484
學位類別 碩士
語言別 繁體中文
第二語言別
口試日期 2007-06-21
論文頁數 87頁
口試委員 指導教授 - 黃振豊
委員 - 洪世章
委員 - 張琬喻
委員 - 黃振豊
關鍵字(中) 環境資訊揭露程度
利害關係人
關鍵字(英) Stakeholder
Environmental information disclosure
第三語言關鍵字
學科別分類
中文摘要
本研究旨在探討台灣上市企業環境資訊揭露程度與不同利害關係人群體間之關聯性,研究以2003年至2005年間上市公司為樣本。實證結果顯示,當年度之罰款與賠償、公司規模、負債程度、顧客關聯性則皆與公司之環境資訊揭露程度呈顯著正相關,顯示公司環保揭露策略受到政府、債權人、及顧客等外部利害關係群體所影響,意味著企業不只是對股東負責,做決策時也須滿足外在各利害關係群體,符合利害關係人理論之論點。其次環境支出預算數、員工人數與環境資訊揭露程度為顯著正相關,大股東持股比和環境資訊揭露程度呈負顯著相關。顯示管理者重視企業環境績效,也樂於將此訊息透露給大眾所知,而公司員工人數越多,員工也傾向關心自身企業環境揭露程度,且當股權越分散,股東人數越多也越關注企業環境資訊之揭露。從中介利害關係人角度觀之,ISO14001認證、高環境敏感度產業與受大型會計事務所查核之公司,皆與環境資訊揭露程度為顯著正相關,意味著ISO認證組織、環保團體及會計事務所與公司無直接利害關係,因此中介利害團體能以大眾利益為出發點,發揮監督力量,對企業環境資訊揭露策略也具有影響力。
英文摘要
This paper aims to investigate the relationship of environmental information disclosure and among stakeholders. 759 samples have been chosen from publicly listed companies. The empirical results reveal the variables of external stakeholders, including annual fines, the scale of a company, debts, and advertisement fees have significantly positive correlation with environmental information disclosure. It suggests that environmental information disclosure has been affected by external stakeholders - government, debtee, and customer. Companies are not only responsible for their stockholders but also responsible for the external stakeholders. The companies with more environmental expenditure budgets and the number of employees have better environmental disclosure, while those companies with more centralized of stocks has the less disclosure of environmental information. Moreover regarding the intermediate stakeholders, companies with higher environmental pollution industries having ISO14001 or auditing under large accounting professional firms show better environmental disclosure. It means that although intermediate stakeholders such as ISO organizations, environmental protection groups, and accounting professional firms have no direct influence on the companies. They will bear the interest of the public in mind to supervise these companies, having to improve their environmental information disclosure.
第三語言摘要
論文目次
壹、緒論	- 1 -
第一節 研究背景與動機	- 1 -
第二節 研究目的	- 3 -
第三節 研究貢獻	- 3 -
第四節 研究流程	- 4 -
貳、文獻探討	- 5 -
第ㄧ節 企業社會責任報告與理論發展	- 6 -
第二節 環境資訊揭露文獻與相關規範	- 11 -
第三節 利害關係人理論之發展與探討	- 17 -
第四節 環境資訊揭露與利害關係人理論結合之文獻	- 22 -
参、第參章 研究方法	- 24 -
第一節 觀念性架構	- 24 -
第二節 研究假說	- 25 -
第三節 變數定義與衡量	- 30 -
第四節 資料來源與分析方法	- 34 -
肆、實證結果與分析	- 38 -
第一節 上市公司財務報表之環境資訊揭露程度	- 38 -
第二節 產業環境之後續深入分析	- 49 -
第三節 企業財務績效之後續深入分析	- 52 -
第四節 採用因素分析與結構方程式之後續分析	- 55 -
伍、研究結論、限制與建議	- 66 -
第一節 研究結論	- 66 -
第二節 研究限制	- 69 -
第三節 研究建議	- 69 -
参考文獻	- 70 -
附錄	- 77 -
表2-1  2007年台灣企業社會責任排名	- 6 -
表2-2  利害關係人之分類	- 21 -
表3-1  各利害關係人之代理變數	- 30 -
表3-2  樣本篩選過程	- 34 -
表3-3  各變數之定義	- 36 -
表4-1  環境資訊揭露程度(759樣本)	- 39 -
表4-2  敘述性統計分析(759家樣本)	- 41 -
表4-3  整體環境揭露程度與自變數間PEARSON相關係數矩陣	- 42 -
表4-4  自願性環境揭露程度與自變數間PEARSON相關係數矩陣	- 43 -
表4-5  非自願性環境揭露程度與自變數間PEARSON相關係數矩陣	- 43 -
表4-6  不同應變數與利害關係群體變數進行迴歸分析結果整理表	- 46 -
表4-7  敏感性分析	- 48 -
表4-8  台灣四大行業各年之防治污染設備投資比例及其分群基值	- 49 -
表4-9  產業環境之分群方式	- 49 -
表4-10 產業環境對照表	- 49 -
表4-11 不同環境敏感群之迴歸結果彙總	- 52 -
表4-12 不同財務績效下利害關係群體與整體資訊揭露關聯性之彙總	- 53 -
表4-13 因素分析檢定結果	- 55 -
表4-14 利害關係群體構面因素分析表	- 56 -
表4-15 模式配適度結果	- 58 -
表4-16 五大因素對不同資訊揭露程度之路徑係數	- 59 -
表4-17 研究量表(史雅男,2004)	- 61 -
表4-18 模式配適度結果	- 62 -
表4-19 各因素與四項環境指標之路徑係數	- 63 -
表5-1  不同環境資訊揭露程度與利害關係群體間之關聯性	- 67 -
表5-2  不同環境敏感產業下整體環境揭露程度與利害關係人關聯性	- 68 -
表5-3 不同財務狀況下,整體環境資訊揭露程度與利害關係群體之關係	- 69 -
圖1-1  研究流程圖	- 4 -
圖2-1  文獻結構圖	- 5 -
圖2-2  社會責任報告與其相關理論之關聯圖	- 8 -
圖3-1  觀念性架構圖	- 24 -
圖4-1  五大因素群體與各環境資訊揭露之關聯圖	- 57 -
圖4-2  五大因素對不同環境資訊揭露程度之路徑圖	- 60 -
圖4-3  五大因素對各環境資訊指標之關聯圖	- 60 -
圖4-4  五大因素對各環境資訊指標之路徑圖	- 64 -
參考文獻
國內文獻:
王佩如,2003,年報環境揭露與合理性理論之研究-以上市公司為例,國立政治大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
王雪慧,2001,企業環境成本會計制度建置之研究,國立交通大學管理科學研
史雅男,2004,環境資訊揭露與環境聲譽關聯性之研究,淡江大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文
白馥禎,1997,環保績效與揭露行為之實證研究:管理當局與會計師之認知差異,文化大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。
吳靜怡,1994,污染防治設備投資與公司經營績效之實證研究,成功大學會計學研究所未出版之碩士論文。
呂宜峰,2004,資訊揭露程度與公司特徵之關聯性研究-以國內IC相關產業為例,文化大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。
汪怡娟,2003,環保支出資訊揭露及揭露品質決定因素之研究,國立成功大學會計學碩士班未出版碩士論文。
周玲臺,1997,我國上市公司財務報告環保資訊之內容研究,行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計劃成果報告。
林嬋娟、劉嘉雯、薛敏正,2001,綠色會計之國際現況與相關指引-兼論改進國 內綠色會計之道,會計研究月刊,第199期:68-82頁。
林慧文,2001,環境會計建構與發展歷程探討,南華大學環境管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
高明瑞、黃俊義,2000,綠色創新的採行與利害相關人關係之實證研究-以台灣製造業為例,科技管理學刊,第五卷第二期:193-220。
涂玉燕,2004,影響台灣上市公司環境資訊揭露因素之探討,輔仁大學會計學碩士班未出版碩士論文。
陳可欣,2005,環境資訊揭露與公司治理關聯性之研究,淡江大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。
黃正忠,2000,邁向新世紀的契機— 全球企業永續發展之現況與趨勢,工業污染防治,第七十五期:111- 130。
黃靖萱,2007,天下公民TOP50,天下雜誌三月號:118-128
趙沛俊,2003,企業環境績效與環境揭露程度關連性之研究,東吳大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。
歐用生,1993,「內容分析法」,教育研究法。
潘景華,2004,新觀念:企業永續發展與社會責任型投資,證交資料月刊。
廖以雯,2005,企業揭露環境資訊動機之研究,東吳大學會計研究所未出版論文。

國外文獻:
Abrams, F. 1951. Management's Responsibilities in a Complex World. Harvard Business Review. 24(3): 29-34.
Ahmed, K. 1995. The Effect of Corporate Characteristics on Disclosure Quality in Corporate Annual Reports. Working paper. Victoria University of Wellington: New Zealand.
Alnajjar, F. K. 2000. Determinants of Social Responsibility Disclosure of U.S.Fortune 500 Firms: An Application of Content Analysis. Advances in Environmental Accounting and Management. 1: 163-200.
Ansoff, I. 1965. Corporate Strategy. McGraw-Hill: New York.
Baron, D. P. 1993. Business and Its Environmental. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs,New Jersey.
Carmines, E. and McIver, J. 1981. Analyzing Models with Unobservd Variables:Analysis of Covariance Structures. In G. Bohmstedt and E. Borgatta, Social measurement. Beverly Hills: Calif.
Carroll, A. B. 1996. Business and Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management. South western College Publishing: Cincinnati.
CCPA. 2000. Corporate Community Involvement: Establishing a Business Case. Centre for Corporate Public Affairs: Melbourne.
Clarke, J. and M. Gibson-Sweet .1999. The Use of Corporate Social Disclosures in the Management of Reputation and Legitimacy: A Cross Sectoral Analysis of UK Top 100 Companies. Business Ethics: A European Review.8(1): 5-14.
Clarkson, M.B.E. 1995. A stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance. Academy of Management Review 20 : 92-117.
Clarkson, M.B.E. 1998. The Corporation and its Stakeholders:Classic and Contemporary Readings. University of Toronto Press:Toronto.
Cormier, D., and M. Magnan. 1999. Corporate Environmental Disclosures Strategies: Determinants, Costs and Benefits. Journal of Accounting Auditing and Finance. 14(4): 429-451.
Cowenl, S. L. Ferrei, and L. Parker. 1987. The Impact of Corporate Characteristics on Social Responsibility Disclosure: A Typology and Frequency-based Analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society 12(2): 111-122.
Cullen, L. and T. Christopher. 2002. Governance Disclosures and Firm Characteristics of Listed Australian Mining Companies. International Journal of Business Studies.10(1): 37-58.
Deegan, C., and B. Gordon. 1996. A Study of The Environmental Disclosure Practices of Australian Corporations. Accounting and Business Research. 26(3): 187-199.
Deegan, C., and M. Rankin. 1996. Do Australian Companies Report Environmental News Ojectively? An analysis of Evironmental Dsclosures by Frms Posecuted Sccessfully by Te Evironmental Potection Athority. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 9(2): 50-67.
Deegan, C., M. Rankin and P. Voght. 2000. Firms Disclosure Reactions to Major Social Incidents: Australian Evidence. Accounting Forum.24(1): 101-130.
Donaldson, T. and Dunfee, T.W.1999. Ties That Bind: A Social Contracts Approach to Business Ethics,Cambridge,Mass.Harvard Business School Press. Harvard Business School Press: Boston.
Donaldson, T., and Preston, L. E. 1995. The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concept, Evidence, and Implications. Academy of Management Review.20: 65-91.
Eng, L. L., and Y. T. Mak. 2003. Corporate Governance and Voluntary Disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 22 : 325-345.
Evans, J.H. III, and S.S. Sridhar. 2002. Disclosure Disciplining Mechanisms: Capital Markets,Product Markets and Shareholder Litigation. The Accounting Review. 77(3): 595-626.
Frederick, W.C., Post, J.E. and Davis, K. 1992. Business and Society:Corporate Strategy, Public Policy, Ethics. McGraw Hill: Maidenhead.
Freeman, M., and Jaggi, B. 1992. An Examination of the Impact of Pollution Performance on Economic and Market Performance: Pulp and Paper. Journal of Business Financial and Accounting. 19(5) : 697-713.
Freeman, M., and Jaggi, B. 2005. Global warming, commitment to the Kyoto protocol,and accounting disclosures by the largest globalpublic firms from polluting industries. The International Journal of Accounting. 40: 215- 232
Freeman, R. E. 1983. Strategic Management A Stakeholder Approach. Advances in Strategic Management 1 : 31-60.
Freeman, R. E. 1984. Strategic Management: A stakeholder Approach. Pitman Publishing: Boston.
Freeman, R. E. 1998. A Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation, in M. B. E. Clarkson (ed.), The Corporation and its Stakeholders: Classic and contemporary Readings. University of Toronto Press: Toronto. 125-138.
Gale, B.T. 1972. Market Share and Rate of Return. The Review of Economics and Statistic. 54(4) :.412-423.
Gioia, D.A. 1999.Practicability, paradigms, and problems in stakeholder theorizing. Academy of Management Review.24: 228-32.
Gray, R., Owen, D. and Adams, C. 1996. Accounting and Accountability; Changes and Challenges in Corporate Social and Environmental Reporting. Prentice-Hall Europe: Harlow.
Gray, R., R. Kouhy, and S. Lavers. 1995. Corporate Social and Environmental Reporting: A Review of The Literature and A Longitudinal Study of UK Disclosure. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal.8(2): 47-77.
Gronhaug, K., and Fredriksen. 1988. Concentration Ratios, Strategy and Performance: The Case of The Norwegian Telecommunications. Managerial and Decision Economics. l9(4): 257-263
Guthrie, J. and L.D. Parker. 1989. Corporate Social Reporting: A Rebuttal of Legitimacy Theory. Accounting and Business Research.19: 343-352.
Hackston, D. and M.J. Milne. 1996. Some Determinants of Social and Environmental Disclosures in New Zealand Companies. Accounting, Auditing, and Accountability Journal.9(1): 77-108.
Hackston, D., and M. J. Milne. 1996. Some Determinants of Social and Environmental Disclosures in New Zealand Companies. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal. 9(1) 77-108.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L. and Black, W. C. 1998. Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings. Prentice-Hall,Englewood Cliffs.NJ.
Halme, M., and M. Huse. 1997. The Influence of Corporate Governance, Industry and Country Factors on Environmental Reporting. Scandinavian Journal of Management. 13(2): 137-157.
Henriques, I, and P. Sadorsky. 1999. The Relationship Between Environmental Commitment and Managerial Perceptions of Stakeholder Importance. Academy of Management Journal 42(1) : 87-99.
Hill, C. W. L. and G. R. Jones 1998. Strategic Management-An Integrated Approach. NY: Houghton Mifflin Company. 
Hill, C.W.L. and Jones T. M. 1992. Stakeholder-Agency Theory. Journal of Management Studies. 29 : 131-154. 
Ho, S. M., and S. W. Kar. 2001. A study of the relationship between corporate governance structures and the extent of voluntary disclosure. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation.10 : 139-156.
Hossian, M., L. M. Tan, and M. Adams. 1994. Voluntary Disclosure in an Emerging Capital Market: Some Empirical Evidence from Companies Listed on the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange. International Journal of Accounting 29: 334-351.
Hughes, P.J. and M.R. Sankar. 1997. The Impact of Litigation Risk on Discretionary Disclosure. Working Paper (University of California, Los Angeles).
Hughes, S. B., A. Anderson, and S. Golden. 2001. Corporate Environmental Disclosures: Are They Useful in Determining Environmental Performance. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy. 20 : 217-240.
Hutton, A.P., G.S. Miller and D.J. Skinner. 2003. The Role of Supplementary Statements with Management Forecasts. Journal of Accounting Research. 41(5): 867-890.
Ingram, R.W. and K.B. Frazier. 1980. Environmental Performance and Corporate Disclosure. Journal of Accounting Research 18 : 614-624.
Jones, T.M. and Wicks, A.C. 1999. Convergent stakeholder theory, Academy of Management Review. 24: 206-21.
Keim, G.. D. 1978. Managerial Behavior and The Social Responsibilities Debate: Goals Versus. Constraints. Academy of Management Journal. 21 : 57-68.
Lang, M. and R. Lundholm. 1993. Cross-Sectional Determinants of Analyst Ratings of Corporate Disclosures. Journal of Accounting Research.31: 246-271.
Lehman, G. 1999. Disclosing new Words: A Role for Social and Environmental  Accounting and Auditing. Accounting, Organizations and Society 24: 217-241.
Lindblom, C. K. 1994. The Implications of Organizational Legitimacy for Corporate Social Performance and Disclosure. Paper Presented at The Critical Perspectives on Accounting Conference: New York.
Miller, G.S. 2002. Earnings Performance and Discretionary Disclosure. Journal of Accounting Research. 40(1): 173-204.
Newman, J.A. and K.M. Breeden, 1992.  Managing in The Environmental Era: Lesson from Environmental Leaders. The Columbia Journal of World Business 27 : 210-221.
Park, O. 1999. Japanese Corporate Environmental Disclosure. Keizai-Kagaku. 47(3) : 21-37
Patten, D. M. 2002. The Relation Between Environmental Performance and Environmental Disclosure: A Research Note. Accounting, Organizations and society 27(8): 763-773.
Richardson ,J., Schlachter, P. and Rockness, H. O. 1986. Hazardous Waste Disposal, Coporate Disclosure, and Financial Performance in the Chemical Industry. Advances in public interest accounting. 1: 167-194.
Roberts, RW. 1992. Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: An Application of Stakeholder Theory. Accounting. Organizations and Society 17(6) : 595-612.
Rogene, A. and  Sandra B. 2004. Stakeholders, Theory, Public policy. Journal of Business Ethics. 51(2): 143-153.
Rubenstein, D. B. 1992. Bridging the Gap Between Green Accounting and Black Ink. Accounting, Organizations and Society 17(5): 201-208.
Ruf, B. M.,. K. Muralidhar, RM. Brown,. JJ Janney, and K. Paul. 2001. An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship Between Change in Corporate Social Performance and Financial Performance: A Stakeholder Theory Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics. 32(2)143-156.
Savage, G.T., T.W. Nix, C.J. Whitehead, and J.D. Blair. 1991. Strategies for Assessing and Managing Organizational Stakeholder. Academy of Management Executive. 5(2) : 61-75.
Shane, P.B. and B.H. Spicer.1983. Market Response to Environmental Information Produced Outside the Firm. The Accounting Review.58(3):521-538.
Sinclair-Desgagn´e, B. and E. Gozlan. 2003. A Theory of Environmental Risk Disclosure. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 45(2): 377-393.
Simon S.M. Ho and Kar Shun Wong. 2001. A study of the relationship between corporate governance structures and the extent of voluntary disclosure. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing & Taxation.10: 139-156..
Skinner, D.J. 1994. Why Firms Voluntarily Disclose Bad News. Journal of Accounting Research. 3238-60.
Soffer, L.C., S.R. Thiagarajan and B.R. Walther.2000. Earnings Preannouncement Strategies.Review of Accounting Studie.5: 5-26.
Stephen, B. and Stephen P. 2006. Voluntary Environmental Disclosures by Large UK   Companies. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting.33(7/8). 1168–1188.
Suchman, M.C. 1995. Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. Academy of Management Review. 20 : 571-610.
Toms, J. S. 2002. Firm Resources, Quality Signals and The Determinants of Corporate Environmental Reputation: Some UK Evidence. British Accounting Review. 34 : 257-282.
Trevin, A. and Weaver, G.R.1999. The stakeholder research tradition: convergent theorists not convergent theory. Academy of Management Review.24: 222-7.
Trueman, B. 1997. Managerial Disclosures and Shareholder Litigation. Review of Accounting Studies. 1: 181-199.
Ullmann AE. 1985. Corporate social reporting: political interests and conflicts in Germany. Accounting Organizations and Society 4(1/2): 123-133.
Ullmann, AE. 1985. Data in Search of A Theory: A Critical Examination of The Relationships Among. Social Performance, Social Disclosure, and Economic Performance of US Firms. Academy of. Management Review. 10(3) : 540-557.
Verrecchia, R.E. 1983. Discretionary Disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 5: 179-194.
Walden, D. W., and B. N. Schwarts. 1997. Environmental Disclosures and Public Policy Pressure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy.16: 125-154.
Watts, R.I. and J.L. Zimmermann. 1978. Towards a Positive Theory of the Determination of Accounting Standards. The Accounting Review.53:112-134.
Watts, RL., and JL. Zimmerman, 1986, Positive Accounting Theory. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Weiss, J.W. 1994 A Stakeholder Approach and Business Ethics. Wadsworth Publishing Co, Belmont: California.
Wiseman, J. 1982. An Evaluation of Environmental Disclosures Made in Corporate Annual Reports Accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society 7(1): 53-64.
Wood, D.J. 1991. Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review. 16: 691-718.
論文全文使用權限
校內
紙本論文於授權書繳交後5年公開
校內書目立即公開
校外
不同意授權

如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信